Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2004, p. 4512-4521, Vol. 70, No. 8
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.8.4512-4521.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Centre for Limnology, Nieuwersluis,1 Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu, Bilthoven,2 Department of Aquatic Ecology and Ecotoxicology (AEE), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,3 Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic4
Received 25 November 2003/ Accepted 14 April 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we investigated both the phototrophic and the heterotrophic microorganisms in a biofilm exposed to copper. The questions we posed were whether physiological and structural changes would occur within a biofilm exposed to an increasing range of Cu concentrations and whether there was a clear relation between the effects on phototrophs and those on heterotrophs. In order to assess changes in species composition, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) (29) was used to generate genetic community structure fingerprints of the eukaryotic, cyanobacterial, and bacterial biofilm compartments. We chose the community-level physiological profile (CLPP) technique (31), to assess variations in the metabolic capacity of the heterotrophic bacterial community in relation to Cu exposure. The pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) fluorescence technique is based on the measurement of the fluorescent emission of light-stimulated pigments (21). The PAM technique allowed a direct assessment of the toxicant effect on the photosynthetic capacity of the algal community, where Cu interacts directly with photosystem II (PSII). Combining these techniques, we found significant differences at the genetic and physiological levels among bacterial communities and differences between unexposed and exposed phototrophic communities at the physiological level.
|
|
|---|
Transplant experiment setup.
Polyethylene racks containing approximately 200 smooth glass disks (1.5 cm2) and smooth rectangular glass plates (
360 cm2) were suspended vertically under a floater in a ditch (approximately 1.20 m deep), perpendicular to the water flow at a depth of 20 cm, and left to be colonized by epiphytic microorganisms (for technical details, see reference 19). The small glass disks were used to collect suitable samples for PAM analysis, while the large glass plates were used to collect enough material for CLPP and DGGE fingerprints. Four aquaria were prepared to receive biofilms by an acid rinsing treatment and were preloaded for 24 h with tap water to which Cu (CuCl2, Tritisol [Merck, Darmstadt, Germany] Cu standard) at the treatment concentration (0, 1, 3, or 10 µM) was added. After a 4-week colonization in April 2002, the biofilms were removed from the ditch, transported to the laboratory in a cooler filled with ditch water to prevent desiccation, and placed in aquaria (three large glass plates and three racks of disks per aquarium) containing 28 liters of filtered (pore size, 15 µm), freshly added ditch water. No significant difference between biofilms from the glass disks and those from the plates could be detected by eye. Cu was added to the aquaria at the expected concentrations. Aquaria are referred to below as control (0 µM) and 1, 3, and 10 µM aquaria. The temperature of all four aquaria was established at 21 ± 1°C and was verified daily directly in the aquarium water. Light was set at an intensity of 100 µmol · m2 · s1 at the water surface during a light-dark cycle of 16 and 8 h, respectively, by using a table light system consisting of one row of 10 30-W fluorescent light tubes. The water was constantly bubbled with air to avoid stratification and CO2 limitation and was totally replaced every 6 to 7 days with filtered site water. Cu concentrations were measured and corrected upon each renewal of the water. The pH increased slightly, on average, from 8.3 to 8.6 in all aquaria, without any significant differences between treatments. The phosphate concentration was measured once a week by following the protocol described by Murphy and Riley (27). Total phosphorus concentrations were consistently higher than 0.1 µM. Therefore, phosphate was probably not a limiting factor.
Copper analyses.
The copper concentration was monitored both in the water and in the biofilm by using atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) according to the method of Barranguet et al. (1). Briefly, on every sampling day, water samples were taken from each aquarium before and after water renewal. The importance of particles in copper speciation in the water, e.g., in case of complex formation with humic substances (26), was evaluated by comparing a 1-ml unfiltered water sample to a filtered sample. Weekly, three biofilm samples per treatment were scraped off by using a sterile razor blade and freeze-dried at 20°C prior to AAS or Flame AAS analysis (for concentrations above 0.1 mg of Cu/liter).
Chlorophyll a content analysis.
Four small glass disks per aquarium were harvested for chlorophyll a content analysis. Chlorophyll a was extracted overnight by using 90% acetone and was measured with a UV-1601 UV-visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Duisburg, Germany) at a wavelength of 665 nm before and after acidification with 0.4 N HCl (25).
PAM fluorescent technique measurements.
In order to assess the response of the phototrophic community to the toxic stress, we used the PAM fluorescence technique. Two chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were investigated: the maximum quantum yield (
0) and photosynthetic efficiency (
PSII) (for further details, see reference 32). The parameter
0 represents the yield of dark-adapted cells, while
PSII reflects the relative electron transport rate of PSII (2). To measure
0, samples were left in the dark for at least 20 min.
Determination of phototrophic community structure by microscopy.
The relative abundance of the phototrophic organisms was estimated by microscopy. Each sampling day, six disks per aquarium were harvested and fixed with formaldehyde for further microscopic investigations. The percentage of a defined area covered by the algal species was used to estimate the proportion of individual algal species in the biofilms. Counting of cells proved impossible, since the algae grew mainly in colonies. Proportions of diatoms could not be estimated due to the fixation method and the biofilms' thickness. Biofilm thickness was not measured per se, but differences could easily be noticed by eye.
Physiological structures of heterotrophic communities.
Bacterial communities were harvested from the biofilms on days 0, 3, 5, 12, 19, and 26 in order to create CLPPs according to a method described elsewhere (M. E. Y. Boivin, B. Massieux, A. M. Breure, F. P. van den Ende, G. Greve, M. Rutgers, and W. Admiraal, submitted for publication). For this purpose, bacterial communities were incubated and monitored in Biolog ECO-plates. The Biolog ECO-plates contain a set of 31 different carbon compounds, and the degradation rates of these compounds are used as substrate utilization capacity measurements of the microorganism or microbial community studied. The inoculated biomass was standardized to an optical density of 0.068 at 750 nm. Plates were incubated in the dark (to prevent any phototrophic growth) at 20°C and 85% ± 5% air humidity. CLPPs were calculated according to the method of Boivin et al. (submitted) from absorbance data measured every 8 h for each well at 590 nm by using a microplate Expert 96 reader spectrophotometer (Asys Hitech, Eugendorf, Austria).
DGGE profiles.
Eukaryotic, cyanobacterial, and bacterial community samples, corresponding approximately to 1/10 of the surface of a large plate, were scraped off by using sterile razor blades and collected on days 0, 3, 5, 10, 17, and 24. Communities were monitored by DGGE between day 3 and day 24 of the Cu exposure period. Separately, bacterial communities were compared in duplicate between days 0 and 3 to determine the natural heterogeneity. All profiles were obtained after DNA extraction using the protocol described by van Hannen et al. (35). PCR was performed using eukaryotic 18S rRNA gene primers (35), cyanobacterial 16S rRNA gene primers (20), and bacterial 16S rRNA gene primers for DGGE (29) (Table 1). PCR amplifications were performed in 50-µl volumes containing template DNA, Taq DNA polymerase buffer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.), 0.5 µM each primer, 200 µM each deoxynucleotide, 400 ng of bovine serum albumin, 1.5 mM MgCl2, and 1.3 U of Taq DNA polymerase. PCR cycling was performed using a Thermo Hybaid thermocycler (Hybaid, Ashford, United Kingdom). The temperature program of the eukaryotic PCR was as follows: 5 min at 94°C; 30 cycles with an annealing temperature of 60°C (30 s) for the first 5 cycles and a touchdown step (in which the annealing temperature was decreased from 60 to 55°C) for 25 cycles, and extension at 68°C for 90 s. The final extension step lasted 10 min. PCR product concentrations were estimated by separation on 1% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide and digital gel image analysis using Phoretix 1D software (Nonlinear Dynamics, Newcastle, United Kingdom).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Primer sequences and target sites
|
DGGE gel picture analysis.
DGGE gel pictures were analyzed by using Phoretix 1D as follows. Lanes were created manually, with a fixed width of 5% of the standard lane width. Each lane represents one sample. Background noise was subtracted by using the rolling ball algorithm with a radius of 50 pixels. First, automatic band detection was performed with a minimum slope of 75 to 100 and a noise reduction of 5, and peaks smaller than 2% of the maximum peak were discarded. The edge detection method was fixed to a width of 1. Then bands were assessed and corrected by eye, one by one. Bands were then matched to create a matrix containing band percentage values of each sample. The band percentage matrix was subjected to nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis using Primer software (version 5; Primer-E, Ltd., Plymouth, United Kingdom) (12).
Statistical analyses.
Differences in Cu accumulation in the biofilms, the ash-free dry weight/dry weight ratio (
), chlorophyll a content,
0, and
PSII were statistically tested by using a parametric factorial ANOVA (analysis of variance) design. This design allows the analysis of two factors and their interaction term. In our case, one factor is copper (Cu), the second is the incubation time (T), and their interaction term (Cu · T) corresponds to the duration of exposure to Cu. Prior to assessment by the factorial ANOVA, estimated values for the parameters listed above were tested for normality (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) and homoscedasticity (Fmax test). All data followed a normal distribution, and based on the Fmax test (P < 0.05), all variances were homogeneous, except for the chlorophyll a measurements. If the factorial ANOVA revealed significant effects, a Tukey honestly significant difference post hoc test (P < 0.05) was performed to group homogeneous means (13). CLPP fingerprint data were compared in a nonparametric multivariate analysis, principal component analysis, to investigate a possible correlation between toxic stress and changes in the substrate utilization capacity of the heterotrophic compartment. The significant influences of the variables (Cu and days of incubation) were tested in a redundancy analysis using a Monte Carlo permutation test (with 9,999 permutations). The NMDS ordination analysis endeavors to position data on a plot of 2 dimensions representing the matching similarities calculated in a triangular matrix of similarity coefficients computed between every pair of samples (8). In this study, the triangular similarity matrix calculation was based on band percentage data retrieved from the gel image analysis using Phoretix 1D and was performed using a Bray-Curtis model, with square root transformation, in the Primer package. NMDS representations were assessed by using the analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) function within the Primer 5 software package.
|
|
|---|
0.0001 for all). This indicates a synergic effect of T and Cu; the longer a biofilm was exposed to Cu, the more the biofilm accumulated Cu.
Biofilm biomass.
The equilibrium between the organic and inorganic matter contents of the biofilm was estimated as the ratio between the ash-free dry weight (estimate of the organic-matter content) and the dry weight (estimate of total [organic plus inorganic matter] content) of the samples (
). The ratio
correlated negatively with Cu, T, and Cu · T (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.004, respectively) (Fig. 1). Most of the variance was supported by results from the last 2 sampling days of the 1 and 3 µM treatments, indicating a decrease in their biofilms' organic matter production. Cu, T, and Cu · T all correlated negatively with the biofilms' chlorophyll a content (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.003, respectively). The chlorophyll a content of the control did not change significantly over time (Fig. 1). The chlorophyll a content of the biofilms from the 10 µM aquarium generated most of the variance, indicating a decrease in the photosynthetic potential of these biofilms.
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Chlorophyll a content (bars) and organic matter content ( ) (lines) of the biofilms from the four aquaria. A letter or an asterisk (for chlorophyll a content or , respectively) indicates a significant difference. a, significantly different from day-3 control; b, significantly different from day-3 control and day-3 1 µM treatment; c, significantly different from day-10 1 µM treatment; *, significantly different from the control and the 10 µM treatment.
|
0 was observed in the 10 µM aquarium: 22% between day 7 and day 24. In 3 weeks' time, the decrease was approximately 10% in control, 1 µM, and 3 µM aquaria, indicating a relatively stable metabolic capacity of their algal consortia. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Cu concentrations and Cu effects on phototrophic parametersa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
PSII, in all aquaria (P < 0.001) (Table 2
PSII between day 7 and day 24 of the experiment (17 and 13%, respectively). The
PSII of 10 µM biofilms was most strongly affected, with a value on day 24 representing only 25.5% of the value on day 7. The pattern of 1 µM
PSII values revealed first a decrease (18% between day 7 and day 17) and then an increase, such that the
PSII on day 24 was only 6% lower than that on day 7. At the beginning of the experiment (day 0), all aquaria were dominated by Chlorophyceae (90% of the total). In the control and 1 µM aquaria, the area covered by cyanobacteria did not represent more than 2% on day 25 (Fig. 2). In contrast, the cyanobacterial area represented 11% of the biofilms, at the end of the experiment, in 3 and 10 µM aquaria. The physiognomy of the biofilms was also affected by the growth of the chain-forming diatom Melosira varians, changing from long filaments to short tufts.
![]() View larger version (44K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Area covered (expressed as a percentage of a defined area) by Chlorophyceae, Xanthophyceae, Conjugatophyceae, Cyanobacteria, and others in the biofilms, determined by microscopy. Numbers above columns indicate the initial micromolar concentration of Cu in the aquarium.
|
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Two-dimensional representations of NMDS of a time series of genetic profiles of the phototrophic communities exposed to a Cu gradient ranging from 0 to 10 µM. NMDS analyses of DGGE profiles of the eukaryotic community (A) and the cyanobacterial community (B) are shown. Days are given next to symbols.
|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Principal-component analysis of the CLPPs of the four aquaria on days 3, 5, 12, 19, and 24. Triangles, natural communities; circles, control; squares, 1 µM Cu; diamonds, 3 µM Cu; crosses, 10 µM Cu. The horizontal axis explains 19.4% of the variance observed, while 15.1% can be explained by the vertical axis. Redundancy analysis was performed by using a Monte Carlo permutation test (9,999 permutations). The first axis was highly significant (P = 0.0001), and the variables, Cu concentration in the biofilm and days of incubation, significantly influenced the observed variance (P = 0.0013 and P = 0.0016, respectively).
|
![]() View larger version (170K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Bacterial DGGE gel picture of biofilm samples exposed to 0, 1, 3, and 10 µM Cu and sampled on days 3, 5, 10, 17, and 24 of the exposure period. Gel image analysis was performed by using the Phoretix 1D software package. Background was subtracted, and bands were automatically detected and manually corrected. A band percentage matrix was generated, and sample similarities were analyzed by NMDS.
|
![]() View larger version (8K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Two-dimensional representation of NMDS of the bacterial communities of biofilms exposed to Cu concentrations ranging from 0 to 10 µM and sampled on days 3, 5, 10, 17, and 24 of the Cu exposure period.
|
![]() View larger version (6K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Two-dimensional representation of NMDS of the bacterial communities of biofilms exposed to Cu concentrations ranging from 0 to 10 µM and sampled on days 0 and 3.
|
|
|
|---|
The phototrophic compartment of the biofilms was dominated by chlorophytes and cyanobacteria. Heterotrophic eukaryotes were present at low abundance throughout the experiment, suggesting that changes in the eukaryotic DGGE profiles were mainly due to changes in the eukaryotic phototrophic community. The eukaryotic community exposed to 10 µM Cu changed over time, but the extent of this change did not exceed the change over time in the control aquarium. Consequently, no correlation between change and Cu treatment can be supported by analysis of DGGE patterns. The changes in cyanobacterial DGGE profiles did not show a consistent direction related to the Cu treatment. The organic matter contents of biofilms exposed to intermediate Cu concentrations decreased significantly. In addition, the chlorophyll a content decreased, indicating a possible decay of the biofilm as a whole. Intriguingly, at first glance, the ratio between the organic and inorganic matter contents of the biofilms from the 10 µM aquarium did not vary significantly during the experiment, indicating that the microorganisms were continuously producing biomass. However, the chlorophyll a contents of the biofilms from the 10 µM aquarium decreased significantly, and the corresponding decrease in photosynthetic efficiency,
PSII, indicates that phototrophic organisms were affected by the Cu stress. This could be explained in two ways. One explanation may be that the phototrophic community was initially dominated by green algae rich in chlorophyll a and later by phototrophic organisms with low chlorophyll a content. Another explanation may be that it was mainly the heterotrophic microorganisms that produced the biomass.
The DGGE analysis makes clear that bacterial communities in all aquaria changed over time. The extent of the change was proportional to the copper concentration, with dramatic changes occurring in biofilms exposed to the highest concentration after 10 days of exposure, when the Cu concentration in these 10 µM biofilms reached a plateau at 100 µmol/g. The proportionality of the change demonstrates that copper is indeed a strong driver of structural changes. The increasing divergence of the bacterial-community structures in the different treatments coincided with the development of differences in metabolic capacities as evidenced by CLPP analysis. The main explanatory variable for the metabolic capacity differences was the copper concentration in the biofilm. Thus, it appears that copper directly or indirectly causes both structural and physiological changes in the bacterial community. The proportional effect of Cu as observed here is in contrast to observations by Konstantinidis et al. (22), who used terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism to study bacteria along a depth profile in two copper-contaminated lake sediments. These authors did not detect large differences between bacterial communities growing at Cu concentrations ranging from 3 to 87 µM. Our results suggest that the complex and organized structure of the biofilm (10, 18, 30) would not protect the bacterial community in the same way that sediments do, even through the formation of extracellular polymeric substances was found to increase several resistance capacities of each encased organism (24) by reducing the bioavailability of heavy metals (33).
Short- and long-term toxicity tests of heavy metals on aquatic biofilms have focused either on the response of the phototrophic compartment (1, 2, 5, 17) or on that of the heterotrophic compartment (34), but toxic effect assessments based on physiological tests (3, 19) or studies considering the biofilm as a whole have not investigated the effect of Cu (6, 23). Possible interactions between phototrophic and heterotrophic compartments of a biofilm may be disturbed when one compartment is severely affected by a stress factor, e.g., an increase in toxicant concentration. In a recent publication, Barranguet et al. (4) reported preliminary results providing insights on the disturbance by Cu of the relationship between algae and bacteria of a biofilm. We extend the knowledge of this relationship by showing that Cu can affect the bacterial community both physiologically and structurally without an apparent link to disturbance of the phototrophic community. Further studies are needed both on the metabolic relationship between phototrophic and heterotrophic organisms and on the relationship between physiological community changes and structural changes.
This work is part of the Stimulation Programme System-Oriented Ecotoxicological Research (SSEO) project "Changing consortia of algae and bacteria in polluted rivers and lakes: discriminating between the roles of toxicants and natural variables" and is supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO).
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»