Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2005, p. 480-486, Vol. 71, No. 1
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.71.1.480-486.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Departments of Earth and Ocean Sciences,1 Microbiology and Immunology,2 Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada3
Received 12 May 2004/ Accepted 18 August 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Viruses are the most abundant biological entities in fresh and marine waters and are typically 5- to 10-fold more abundant than prokaryotes (1, 19, 29). As mortality agents of heterotrophic and photosynthetic microbes (8, 25, 37), they affect the abundance and diversity of host cell communities (13, 18) as well as the cycling of carbon and nutrients (37).
The proportion of primary producers lost to viral lysis is uncertain; however, viruses infecting a single strain of the marine cyanobacterium Synechococcus are widespread and can reach levels of abundance of >105 ml1 (16, 27, 36). Estimates from the proportions of visibly infected cells and viral decay rates suggest that approximately 3 to 10% of Synechococcus spp. are destroyed daily by viral lysis (19, 26, 37).
The impact of viruses on host communities can be inferred from viral community diversity, as viral taxonomy can provide insights into the hosts that they infect. For example, phylogenetic analyses of algal virus DNA polymerase genes revealed that phycoviruses are monophyletic relative to other viral families and that genetically distinct groups are clearly resolved and correspond to the host taxon infected (3, 4). Subsequently, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) was combined with PCR (22) to "fingerprint" and compare spatial (23) and temporal (24) differences among algal virus communities.
The power of combining PCR with DGGE persuaded us to adopt this approach to examine the diversity of cyanophages in a wide range of natural environments. Previously, primers specific for conserved regions of g20 (a structural gene) in three cyanophages (S-PM2, S-BnM1, and S-WHM1) were developed to amplify a 165-bp fragment (9, 40). DGGE fingerprints of PCR-amplified g20 gene fragments showed that cyanophage communities differed over spatial scales from meters (7) to thousands of kilometers (39). Because the size of the fragment was small for phylogenetic analysis, other primers were developed to amplify a 592-bp region of cyanophage g20 genes (41). With these primers, cyanophage gene fragments were amplified from estuarine and coastal locations in the Atlantic Ocean (17, 35, 41) and from one freshwater lake (5) and were compared phylogenetically.
Our study characterized the richness of cyanophage g20 genes in a much wider range of environments than was previously examined. Although distinct sequence clusters occurred in distinct environments, some sequences with >99% sequence identity were also amplified from vastly different environments. This suggests that similar hosts and their viruses are found in freshwater and marine environments or that high sequence homology in this gene may not be indicative of viruses that infect closely related hosts. In addition, g20 sequences were amplified from samples from a depth of 3,246 m in the Chuckchi Sea, consistent with the possibility of CPS primers not being specific for cyanophages.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Details of samples used for this study
|
For other samples, organisms and particles that were larger than viruses were removed by filtration through a 142-mm-diameter, 1.2-µm-pore-size (GC50; Advantec MFS, Dublin, Calif.) or 0.6-µm-pore-size (GFF; Whatman, Clifton, N.J.) glass-fiber filter followed by a 0.45-µm-pore-size (GVWP; Millipore) or 0.2-µm-pore-size (Gelman, East Hills, N.Y.) filter. Virus-sized particles in the filtrate were concentrated ca. 50- to 500-fold by ultrafiltration (30) with a 10- or 30-kDa-cutoff Amicon (S1Y10/S1Y30/S10Y30) cartridge. Subsamples (100 ml) from the Arctic Ocean were further concentrated to ca. 500 µl by the use of Centricon Plus-20 centrifugal filters (Millipore) and then stored at 20°C. Other concentrates were stored at 4°C in the dark until used for analysis. DGGE g20 profiles of virus communities stored in this way for >18 months were invariant (7).
The upstream primer CPS4 was designed previously (40). To amplify a larger fragment for phylogenetic analysis, we aligned the available g20 sequences in GenBank (for the cyanomyoviruses S-PM2, S-BnM1, and S-WHM1; the coliphage T4; and the marine vibriophage KVP40) to design a new downstream primer (G20-2) that targeted cyanophages but not other phages. The primers were tested on four cyanomyoviruses (S-PWM1, S-PWM2, S-PWM3, and S-PWM4), a cyanopodovirus (S-BBP1), a cyanosiphovirus (S-BBS1) (28), and 20 uncharacterized cyanophages isolated from the Gulf of Mexico. Also, the primer specificity was tested against two myoviruses that infect Vibrio parahaemolyticus (VpV 360 and VpV HS1) and against the coliphages T4, RB33, RB69, and LZ4.
Subsamples (35 ml) of viral concentrates from the Gulf of Mexico, the Southern Ocean, and British Columbian lakes were centrifuged at 85,000 x g for 3.5 h; subsamples (38 ml) from the Southeast Pacific were centrifuged at 104,000 x g for 3 h. Either 100 or 500 µl of virus-free water was added to the virus pellets. An established hot-cold technique (4) was used to extract nucleic acids from the diluted virus pellets and from 100-µl subsamples of the viral concentrates from the Northeast Pacific inlets, Lake Constance, the Arctic Ocean, and filtered culture lysates. Three microliters of each template was added to a 47-µl PCR mixture containing Taq DNA polymerase assay buffer (50 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.4]), 1.5 mM MgCl2, a 0.20 mM concentration of each deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate, 40 pmol each of the primers CPS4 (40) and G20-2 [5'-(G/C)(A/T)(A/G)AAATA(C/T)TT(inosine)CC(A/G)AC(A/G)(A/T)A(G/T)GGATC-3'], and 1.0 U of Platinum Taq polymerase (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, Calif.). Negative controls contained all reagents and sterile water instead of a template. PCRs were performed with the following cycle parameters: denaturation at 94°C for 90 s, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 45 s, annealing at 50°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 45 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. PCR products were electrophoresed in 2% agarose in 0.5x TBE buffer (45 mM Tris-borate, 1 mM EDTA [pH 8.0]) at 100 V for 75 min. Gels were stained with ethidium bromide, visualized on a UV transilluminator, and photographed with a Nikon Coolpix 950 digital camera. Digital images were manipulated with Adobe Photoshop 5.0 LE. After the PCR products were purified from agarose gels, they were used as templates for a second round of PCRs. With a clean glass pipette, a plug of agarose containing amplified DNA was removed from each lane. One hundred microliters of 0.5x TBE was added to each plug in a sterile microcentrifuge tube and heated to 65°C to elute the DNA. Two microliters of the eluted DNA was added to a 98-µl PCR mixture, and the PCR was conducted as described above, except that the number of cycles of amplification was reduced to 25. Amplification in second-stage PCRs was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis as described above.
Second-stage PCR products (20 to 35 µl) were separated by DGGE. Gels with 20 to 40% linear denaturing gradients (100% denaturant is defined as 7 M urea and 40% deionized formamide) and 7 to 8% polyacrylamide were run for 15 h in 1x TAE buffer (40 mM Tris base, 20 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM EDTA [pH 8.5]) at 80 V and 60°C in a D-code electrophoresis system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.). The gels were stained in a 0.1x SYBR Gold (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oreg.) solution for 3 h, visualized, and photographed as described above.
Ninety-nine bands were excised from the gels, added to 100 µl of 1x TAE buffer in sterile microcentrifuge tubes, and heated to 95°C for 10 min. PCRs were conducted with 2 µl of the eluted DNA as a template under the same conditions as the first-stage PCRs, but with 28 cycles of amplification. PCR products were cloned by use of a pGEM-T Vector System I (Promega, Madison, Wis.) TA cloning kit, and the resulting reactions were used to transform competent Escherichia coli JM109 (Promega). Colonies were screened for correct inserts by PCRs with the primers CPS4 and G20-2. Plasmid DNAs were harvested from overnight cultures by the use of QIAprep spin miniprep kits (Qiagen, Valencia, Calif.). The clones were sequenced by use of an AmpliTaq FS BigDye terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.), and excess dye terminators were removed by the use of Centri-Sep spin columns (Princeton Separations, Adelphia, N.J.). Reactions were run in an ABI model 373 stretch or ABI Prism 377 automated sequencer.
Bioedit (version 5.0.7) was used for sequence editing, translation, and the generation of pairwise DNA identity matrices (10). For sequences from a single location with >99% identical nucleotides, only one was used for phylogenetic analysis. Inferred amino acids of the unknown sequences were aligned with other g20 sequences from GenBank by the use of ClustalX (version 1.81) and the protein weight matrix Gonnet (32). The alignment was used to construct neighbor-joining trees with the Treecon program (33). Evolutionary distances were calculated by use of the correction of Tajima and Nei (31a), and the node reproducibility was estimated by a bootstrap analysis which included 1,000 replicates. Phylogenetic trees were drawn and visualized with Treecon (33).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The nucleotide sequences reported in this paper have been submitted to GenBank and assigned the accession numbers AY705091 to AY705146.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (46K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Negative images of denaturing gradient gels of PCR-amplified g20 gene fragments. Labeled bands were excised from the gels, cloned, and then sequenced. Bands in the same lane with the same letter beside them (a, b, or c) had >99% identical nucleotides. From within each lane, only one sequence with >99% identical nucleotides was included in further analyses. Bands with labels that have an asterisk and are shown in bold were included in the phylogenetic analysis.
|
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Neighbor-joining tree of g20 fragments. Bootstrap values are shown as percentages to the lower left of the appropriate nodes. Sequences of cyanophage isolates do not have a bar next to them, and sequences with a black, white, or gray bar to the right are environmental g20 sequences that were obtained from GenBank. Environmental sequences obtained during the present study are indicated by colored bars, and the sequences of the cyanophage isolates obtained during the present study are named S-PWM3 and S-PWM4. The three letters in the sequence name refer to the location and the two numbers refer to the year of collection. Clusters A to F and I to III were assigned by Zhong et al. (41), clusters N1 to N4 were assigned by Wang et al. (35), and clusters 1 to 6 were assigned by Dorigo et al. (5). We assigned clusters G, H, J, K, and CSP. All clusters were assigned on the basis of phylogenetic relatedness. The scale bar represents the number of amino acid substitutions per residue.
|
One of the most surprising results was that sequences with >99% identical nucleotides were recovered from environments that differed substantially in temperature, salinity, and location. For example, sequences GOM01-16, SPM02-28, LAC95A-1, and ANT98-20 shared 99% identity and were recovered from the Gulf of Mexico, the Arctic cyanobacterial mat, Lake Constance, and the Southern Ocean, respectively. Similarly, sequences COL00-36, LAC95B-10, and SPM02-27 had >99% identity and occurred in samples from the Southeast Pacific, Lake Constance, and the Arctic cyanobacterial mat, respectively, as did sequences BES02-27 and LAC95B-8, which were recovered from the Beaufort Sea and Lake Constance.
|
|
|---|
We designed a degenerate downstream primer (G20-2) that, when used with a previously designed (40) nondegenerate upstream primer (CPS4), amplifies a g20 fragment from myoviruses infecting Synechococcus spp. but not from T4 or other myoviruses infecting heterotrophic bacteria. Limited testing showed that these primers were specific to cyanomyoviruses, consistent with the results of other investigators who tested similar primers (CPS1 and CPS8) (41). G20-2 and CPS4 target the same location on g20 as primers (CPS1 and CPS8) used by other investigators to amplify g20 sequences from the Atlantic Ocean (41), Chesapeake Bay (35), and Lake Bourget (5). These two primer pairs amplified some nearly identical sequences, but there were also g20 sequence groups that were amplified by only one of the primer pairs. The differences may have been because of differences in primer degeneracy. CPS4 is nondegenerate, while CPS1 has fourfold degeneracy, CPS8 has 12-fold degeneracy, and G20-2 has 256-fold degeneracy and includes one inosine residue, which increases the degeneracy of this primer to 1,024-fold without increasing the number of different primers.
As found previously (41), a group (CSP) of three clades contained all of the g20 sequences from cyanophage isolates. In addition, 22 of 54 environmental sequences from our study fell into this group, including most sequences from the Northeast Pacific inlets and the Gulf of Mexico. This was consistent with the high levels of abundance of Synechococcus and infectious cyanophages at these locations (7, 27, 28). Because of the presence of cyanobacteria, it was also not surprising that many sequences from the Arctic cyanobacterial mat and the sequence from a catfish production pond fell within the CSP group.
The majority of g20 sequences (32 of 54) were not closely related to sequences in the CSP group or to sequences from other studies. Many sequences that clustered outside the CSP group were from the Arctic Ocean and lakes in British Columbia and Germany. They formed four new phylogenetic groups (G, H, J, and K), two of which were entirely composed of sequences from freshwater. It seems likely that sequences outside the CSP group were not from cyanophages. For example, three Arctic Ocean sequences were from a depth of >3,000 m. The picocyanobacterial abundance in the Arctic Ocean is <102 cells ml1 due to low growth rates and high losses from grazing, advection, and mixing (34). This is well below the abundance that would be expected to support significant lytic virus production (27). In addition, the half-life of virus particles in the sea is typically a few days due to adsorption to particles, solar radiation, and flagellate grazing (31). Given the low levels of abundance of cyanobacteria in Arctic surface waters, the inability of cyanobacteria to produce viruses below the photic zone, and the high turnover of viruses in the sea, it is most likely that these and other g20 sequences outside the CSP group are from bacteriophages that do not infect cyanobacteria. It is possible that infected cyanobacteria sink out of the photic zone or that particle-associated cyanophages were transported to these depths, but these should have been removed by prefiltration (0.2-µm-pore-size filter).
Three groups of indistinguishable sequences were recovered from environments that differed greatly in location, salinity, and temperature. The group with representatives from the widest range of environments included sequences from the Gulf of Mexico, the Southern Ocean, an Arctic ice-shelf meltwater pond, and Lake Constance. Nearly identical g20 gene sequences have also been obtained from cyanophage isolates from the Altamaha River estuary in Georgia (P77) (16) and Woods Hole, Mass. (S-WHM1) (38), and S-RIM1 from coastal Rhode Island (17) clusters close to S-PWM1 (28) from the Gulf of Mexico (17). The presence of almost identical sequences at the ends of long branches argues against genetic drift, which would be expected to produce a continuum of sequences with similar differences to each other. Similarly, >99% identical podophage DNA polymerase sequences occur in marine, freshwater, and terrestrial environments (2), and genetically related vibriophages are widely distributed in waters off Florida and Hawaii (14).
If closely related g20 genes are indicative of viruses that infect closely related hosts, as is the case for DNA polymerase genes of algal viruses (3, 23), then the results imply that closely related host cells and the viruses which infect them are distributed across a very broad range of environments. Alternatively, if these sequences are from phages that infect distantly related or unrelated hosts, it implies a broad horizontal exchange of g20 among phage communities (12). Evidence for the latter is provided by the coliphage T4 and the cyanophage S-PM2, which both contain a 10-kb genetic module that includes g20 (11). Alternatively, it was hypothesized that nearly identical T7-like DNA polymerase sequences in marine, freshwater, and terrestrial environments suggested that phages moved among these environments (2). Although the origin of identical gene sequences in different environments is open to speculation, evidence of broad mosaicism among tailed bacteriophages provides a compelling argument for horizontal exchange (12).
The present study provides the first data on the widespread distribution and sequence diversity of T4-like g20 genes in nature. The extent of this diversity is remarkable, as is the observation that nearly identical gene sequences can be found in very different environments. Our data strongly suggest that g20 sequences outside the CSP group are not from cyanophages, but confirmation of this awaits the isolation of representative phages from these groups. Further work will need to explore the mechanisms responsible for controlling the distribution and maintenance of specific g20 genotypes in nature.
This study was supported by an NSERC grant to C.A.S., by the Japan/Canada Western Arctic Climate Study (JWACS), and by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Strategic Fund.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»