Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2005, p. 5888-5892, Vol. 71, No. 10
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.71.10.5888-5892.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Improvement of NaNO2-Oxidizing Activity in Nitrobacter vulgaris by Coentrapment in Polyacrylamide Containing Polydimethylsiloxane Copolymer and DEAE-Sephadex
Songping Zhang,1,3
Olof Norrlöw,2 and
Estera Szwajcer Dey1*
Pure and Applied Biochemistry, Lund University, Box 124, 221 00 Lund, Sweden,1
Recycling Competence Centre, Kemira Kemi AB, Box 902, 251 09 Helsinborg, Sweden,2
National Key Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 353, Beijing 100080, People's Republic of China3
Received 26 February 2005/
Accepted 29 April 2005

ABSTRACT
Removal of nitrite and nitrate from drinking water has attracted
great attention in recent years because of the human health
risk induced by the exposure to contaminated groundwater and
surface water. We have therefore tested a model nitrite oxidation
system by coentrapping the NaNO
2 oxidizer
Nitrobacter vulgaris with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) copolymer and DEAE-Sephadex
in a polyacrylamide gel. The copolymer and the anion exchanger
facilitate the diffusion of oxygen and NaNO
2, respectively,
into the gel matrix. To test the nitrite-oxidizing activity,
the entrapped cells were coupled to a thermal sensor. Coentrapment
of 5% (wt/vol) DEAE-Sephadex with
Nitrobacter vulgaris increased
the nitrite-oxidizing activity by a factor of 3.7 compared to
entrapped cells alone, and by the addition of 0.86% (wt/vol)
artificial oxygen carrier PDMS copolymer increased the activity
further to 4.3 times higher. Operational and storage stability
of the coentrapped
N.
vulgaris also improved. This suggests that
this enhanced immobilized cell system can also be used for nitrite
oxidation to nitrate in drinking water as an on-line thermally
monitored bioreactor.

INTRODUCTION
The removal of nitrate (NO
3) and nitrite (NO
2)
from drinking water has attracted great attention in recent
years because of the human health risk caused by the exposure
to groundwater and surface water contaminated with these anions.
This risk is due to NaNO
2's direct toxicity by causing methemoglobinemia
and cancer (
18). The NaNO
2 concentration permitted in drinking
water is 0.2 mg liter
1 (
30). Biological ammonia removal
occurs by the process of nitrification to nitrate. Nitrate can
subsequently be denitrified to nitrogen. Chemo-litho-autotrophic
bacteria oxidize ammonia to nitrate in two separate steps. The
oxidation of ammonia to nitrite is carried out by
Nitrosomonas,
Nitrosospira,
Nitrosovibrio, and
Nitrosococcus, while nitrite
oxidizers include
Nitrobacter,
Nitrospira,
Nitrococcus, and
Nitrospina gracilis species (
2,
4). In denitrification after
NaNO
2 oxidation, nitrate is converted by denitrifying bacteria
under anaerobic conditions to nitrogen gas. The nitrification
steps often become rate limited by oxygen availability. The
oxidation of NaNO
2 is catalyzed by nitrite oxidoreductase, which
is located at the inner side of the cytoplasmic and intracytoplasmic
membranes of
Nitrobacter cells (
29,
36). NaNO
2 oxidizers are
slow-growing organisms with generation times of up to 140 h
(
3), which makes them easily washed out from treatment plants
(
23). They are therefore rarely responsible for nitrite oxidation
in wastewater treatment. Nitrifiers can be immobilized in a
polymer matrix (
1,
10,
15,
19,
32-
35,
38,
39) or attached to
a membrane with a micro- or macroscale (
27). The immobilized
nitrifiers (
28) are already used in continuously operating pilot
units for nitrogen removal from different wastewater sources
in the Czech Republic, Chemopetrol a.s. Litvinov. The main advantage
of immobilized cells is the high concentration of active biocatalyst
attainable in the solid phase (
10). The disadvantage is that
in such high-density reactors the conversion rate can be limited
by the diffusion of substrates, i.e., oxygen and NaNO
2 (
38).
To solve the problem of oxygen limitation, pure oxygen can be used instead of air, leading to better oxygen mass transfer and saturation. The drawback of using pure oxygen is that it is expensive. Another option is to increase the oxygen-carrying capacity of the aerobic reaction system by using oxygen carriers. So far, a variety of oxygen carriers have been employed in biological systems, such as hemoglobin (26), perfluorochemicals (12), dodecane (17), and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) or PDMS copolymer (11, 20). PDMS oil and PDMS copolymer successfully increased the solubility of oxygen in the tested biological systems (11, 37). Apart from oxygen carriers, catalase was also used as an oxygen generator in the presence of H2O2 (7, 14) by catalyzing the reaction (24) shown in equation 1:
Biological reactions are always associated with heat gain or loss. Even though microbial metabolism is composed of many individual reactions, the net conversion process can be thermodynamically treated as a simple chemical reaction. Therefore, the net metabolic activity of living cells can be evaluated by calorimetry. The conversion of NaNO2 to nitrate carried out by nitrite oxidoreductase can be described by equation 2 (9):
The heat production rate (electrical signal) upon the injection of NaNO2 substrate solution to the immobilized N. vulgaris-based microbial thermosensor system (6) measures NaNO2 oxidoreductase activity of the N. vulgaris cells. Of three Nitrobacter sp. strains used for nitrite analysis (without enhancer), Nitrobacter vulgaris was shown to be most suitable for the construction of microbial biosensor (25).
The objective of these studies was to show that an improved NaNO2-oxidizing activity of a laboratory strain of N. vulgaris could be attained when cells were coimmobilized with an anion exchanger and an oxygen carrier. This suggests that an analogous bioreactor can easily be constructed to remove NO2 from drinking water. We also show that the microbial thermosensor can be used for quantitative determination of nitrite conversion to nitrate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials.
Acrylamide/bis-acrylamide (19:1 [wt/wt]) from Sigma (St. Louis,
MO) was prepared as a 40% stock solution.
N,
N,
N',
N'-tetramethyethylenediamine
(TEMED) and ammonium persulfate [(NH
4)
2S
2O
8] were from Fluka
(Buch, Switzerland). DEAE-Sephadex A-25 was purchased from Amersham
Biosciences AB (Uppsala, Sweden). PDMS copolymer Q2-5247 fluid,
composed of 18% dimethylsiloxane, 35% ethylene oxide, and 46%
propylene oxide, was a gift from Dow Corning (Midland, MI).
Catalase (catazyme 25L; 25,000 U/ml) from
Aspergillus niger was provided by Novo Nordisk (Bagsvaerd, Denmark). Trisoperl
controlled-pore glass beads (CPG; particle diameter, 125 to
140 µm; pore diameter, 49.6 nm) with free amino groups
were from Schuller GmbH (Steinach, Germany).
All other chemicals were of analytical grade and purchased from various commercial sources.
Bacterial strain and culture maintenance.
Nitrobacter vulgaris (DSM 10236) was obtained from Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH (Braunschweig, Germany) as an actively growing culture. Propagation was carried out by inoculating 2 ml of the received culture to 200 ml mixotrophic medium and incubating the mixture on a rotary shaker (150 rpm) in the dark at 28°C until the attenuance at 450 nm (D450) had reached about 0.4. Nitrobacter vulgaris was grown in a modification of the mixotrophic medium described by Bock et al. (3). Two grams of NaNO2 instead of 1.0 g was used, and 1.0 ml of trace element solution per liter was included. The trace element solution had the following composition (per liter): 33.8 mg MnSO4·H2O, 49.4 mg H3BO3, 43.1 mg ZnSO4·7H2O, 37.1 mg (NH4)6Mo7O24, 97.3 mg FeSO4·7H2O, 25.0 mg CuSO4·5H2O. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH. The mixotrophic medium was selected instead of the heterotrophic because cells cultured in the former medium grow better, according to Bock et al. (3).
The growth of the cells was monitored by measuring the D450 using a HITACHI U-3200 spectrophotometer and the NaNO2 consumption rate using a Merck nitrite Spectroquant test kit (no. 1.14547.0001). When NaNO2 in the medium was depleted, concentrated NaNO2 solution (100 g liter1) was added to a final concentration of 2.0 g liter1. For preparation of frozen inoculates, 180ml of cell suspension (D450 = 0.37) was harvested by centrifugation at +4°C for 15 min at 10,000 x g and then resuspended in 60 ml mixotrophic medium supplemented with 5% dimethyl sulfoxide as cryoprotectant. The cell suspension was distributed to 1.5-ml cryovials, frozen in liquid nitrogen for 30 min, and then stored in a 80°C freezer until use. For inoculation, one or two vials of inocula were used.
Entrapment of N. vulgaris in polyacrylamide gel.
Phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.0) was used through the entrapment procedure. A 20% (wt/vol) acrylamide/bis-acrylamide stock solution (19:1 [wt/wt]) in phosphate buffer was prepared and stored at +4°C. One hundred milliliters of cell suspension at a D450 of 0.74 was harvested by centrifugation as above. After subsequent washing with 60 ml 0.9% NaCl solution, the pellet was resuspended in 2.5 ml cold phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.0) and used for entrapment.
Four kinds of additives were coentrapped with N. vulgaris cells in polyacrylamide gel (Table 1). A cell suspension (2.5 ml) of N. vulgaris was entrapped by stirring at low speed with acrylamide/bis-acrylamide (5 ml, 20%) and different additives (Table 1). Ammonium persulfate and TEMED were then added under stirring to initiate the polymerization of acrylamide. Ten milliliters of each gel mixture was poured into a petri dish (8.5 cm diameter) and kept at room temperature for 1 h and then stored at +4°C overnight. The thickness of the gel was measured as 1.7 mm. The gel was then pressed through a stainless steel sieve of 1-mm mesh. This procedure results in rod-shaped gel particles with a smooth surface. The gel particles were washed with 130 ml phosphate buffer by filtration through a funnel and kept in phosphate buffer at +4°C.
Four kinds of polyacrylamide gel beads were prepared (Table
1): (i) gel with entrapped
N. vulgaris cells only (G-1); (ii)
gel with cells coentrapped with CPG-catalase (G-2); (iii) gel
with cells coentrapped with 5% (wt/vol) anion exchanger DEAE-Sephadex
(G-3); and (iv) gel with cells coentrapped with 5% (wt/vol)
DEAE-Sephadex and 5% (wt/vol) PDMS copolymer Q2-5247 (G-4).
Determination of the entrapped amount of PDMS copolymer.
During the washing procedure, part of the PDMS copolymer was washed out from the gel matrix of G-4. To make a reference sample, 0.5 ml of PDMS copolymer (the same amount as used for entrapment) was mixed with 129.5 ml phosphate buffer to get the same volume of washing buffer. Si elemental concentration was analyzed by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy with an ICP-OES Optima 4300V apparatus from Perkin-Elmer. The results showed that Si elemental concentrations in the reference sample and washing buffer solutions were 580 and 480 mg Si kg1 solution, respectively. The initial PDMS copolymer concentration in the mixture before polymerization was 5% (wt/vol) (Table 1). Therefore, the actual concentration of PDMS copolymer entrapped in G-4 was calculated from the equation % PDMS = (1 480/580) x 5%, or 0.86%.
MT testing.
The polyacrylamide gel beads G-1, G-2, G-3, and G-4 were transferred into a column (0.7 ml; dimensions of 2.5 by 0.7 cm) and assembled with the thermometric system to construct a microbial thermosensor (MT). The MT unit was maintained at 30°C by an outer jacket (8). The nitrite-oxidizing activity of the immobilized N. vulgaris was tested under the following experimental conditions: (i) phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.8) as running buffer (except when indicated) at a constant flow rate of 0.7 ml min1. (ii) NaNO2 solutions of defined concentration were prepared in running buffer, and 0.5 ml was injected into the MT unit. The reaction velocity was determined from the peak height representing heat produced during the enzymatic oxidation of NaNO2 (6).
(i) Testing of coentrapped CPG-catalase as oxygen supplier.
A series of MT testing was done on a biosensor consisting of coentrapped N. vulgaris and CPG-catalase (G-2). The signals from injection of 0.5-ml samples containing either NaNO2 (145 mM) or H2O2 (2.94 mM) or a mixture were recorded and compared. In another experimental procedure, H2O2 (2.94 mM) was continuously pumped through the MT unit. After 10 min, when a constant signal from the enzymatic reaction between CPG-catalase and H2O2 was obtained, NaNO2 (0.5ml, 145 mM) was then injected. The injection of NaNO2 was repeated when the electrical signal returned to a constant value.
(ii) Calibration curves for NaNO2.
NaNO2 solutions (0.5 ml) with concentrations ranging from 0 to 261 mM were used to calibrate the NaNO2 MT, consisting of G-1, G-3, or G-4 (Table 1). Calibration curves for each MT were obtained by plotting the electrical signal (peak height) against various NaNO2 concentrations.
(iii) Preparation of solutions for measurement of the effect of aeration conditions on nitrite-oxidizing activity.
The running buffer and NaNO2 solutions used were degassed by sonication under vacuum for 30 min. The MT unit was equilibrated with the degassed buffer for 20 min followed by injection of the degassed substrate. Oxygen-saturated buffer and NaNO2 solutions were made with oxygen by bubbling with pure oxygen for 20 min. For each condition, the experiment was carried out in triplicate.
To determine if the observed nitrifying activities were of statistical significance under degassed and oxygen-aerated conditions, a standard t test was performed, proper for small population samples (22). The null hypothesis was assumed, i.e., that there is no difference under diverse aeration conditions. From the average signal values, the standard error, and the degrees of freedom, which was 4, the t values and the probability P values were calculated. The P values were estimated by applying the software SigmaStat (version 3.01 A; SYSTAT). When P is less than 0.05, it can be concluded that there are significant differences.
(iv) Effect of pH on nitrite-oxidizing activity.
Nitrite-oxidizing activity assays with MTs G-1, G-3, and G-4 were carried out over a pH range of 6 to 9. Phosphate (50 mM) and Tris-HCl (50 mM) buffers were used for pH ranges of 6.0 to 8.0 and 8.5 to 9.0, respectively. For each new pH, the MT unit was equilibrated with the new running buffer for at least 30 min at the flow rate of 0.7 ml min1 before NaNO2 sample injection.
(v) Operational and storage stability.
The operational stability of MT was tested with G-4 as an example. Within 1 day, 20 successive injections were carried out. The storage stabilities of G-1, G-3, and G-4 were tested by measuring the nitrite-oxidizing activity for a period of 60 days. The columns were stored in phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.8) at +4°C.

RESULTS
Testing of coentrapped catalase as oxygen supplier.
Figure
1 illustrates the thermosensor testing of an MT consisting
of coentrapped
N. vulgaris cells with CPG-catalase (G-2). Peak
a shows the signal from injection of NaNO
2 alone. H
2O
2 gave
a 4-times-higher signal (peak b), while the signal from solution
containing both NaNO
2 and H
2O
2 was 2.5 times higher than control
(c). This was unexpected, since a larger signal is supposed
to result from the combined two enzymatic reactions, hydrogen
peroxide oxido-reduction and nitrification. Continuous supply
of H
2O
2 resulted in a constant signal similar to that of b (d).
Nevertheless, a large decrease in the signal (shown as a negative
peak) subsequently appeared after injection of NaNO
2 (e). Continued
supply of H
2O
2 increased the electrical signal but to a lower
constant value. Repeated injection of NaNO
2 resulted in a new
negative peak, which again returned to another even-lower constant
signal (f).
Calibration curves for NaNO2 from MT testing.
Figure
2 shows the typical recording from NaNO
2 with MTs G-1,
G-3, and G-4. With MTs G-3 and G-4, a symmetric positive peak
followed by a negative peak was recorded (Fig.
2).
Figure
3 compares calibration plots for NaNO
2 obtained with
MT G-1, G-3, and G-4 gels. A good linear relationship between
electrical signal and NaNO
2 concentration up to 200 mM was observed.
For the MTs G-1, G-3, and G-4, the slopes of the calibration
curves are 0.183, 0.671, and 0.790. The slope is thus a measure
of their nitrite-oxidizing activity. Compared to the nitrite-oxidizing
activity of gel with cells alone (G-1), the activity of G-3
is 3.7 times higher. When 0.86% PDMS copolymer and DEAE-Sephadex
(G-4) were coentrapped, the nitrite-oxidizing activity was 4.3
times higher.
Effect of oxygen saturation on nitrite-oxidizing activity.
The effects of oxygen on nitrite-oxidizing activity of the MTs
G-3 and G-4 are illustrated in Table
2. The significance test
results shown in Table
2 suggest that for the MT G-4, the electrical
signal from oxygen-saturated NaNO
2 and running buffer increased
20 to

23% compared to the signal in the degassed system with
the tested NaNO
2 concentrations, and the difference between
them was statistically significant (
P values are 0.0154 and
0.0009 under NaNO
2 concentrations of 7.22 mM and 14.5 mM, respectively).
The biosensor consisting of G-3 without PDMS showed no significant
increase (
P values are 0.656 and 0.223 under NaNO
2 concentrations
of 7.22 mM and 14.5 mM, respectively) under oxygen-saturated
conditions.
Effect of pH on nitrite-oxidizing activity.
The NaNO
2 biosensors were also characterized with respect to
pH. For G-3 and G-4, the highest nitrite-oxidizing activity
was obtained at pH 8.0, which is in agreement with results obtained
with free
Nitrobacter cells (
13).
Operational reproducibility and storage stability.
The MT G-4 biosensor was used for a repeated run of experiments. During 20 successive runs, very little fluctuation in activity relative to the first run was observed. The average peak height was 12.12 cm, and the standard deviation was 0.014. After 60 days refrigeration at 4°C, the MT G-4 retained nitrite-oxidizing activity as high as 80%. MTs G-1 and G-3, however, retained 64% and 63%, respectively (data not shown).

DISCUSSION
We have enhanced the nitrite-oxidizing activity of entrapped
N. vulgaris cells by coentrapping oxygen-providing materials
and promoting NaNO
2 diffusion to the cells. In previous experiments,
catalase was used to provide oxygen from H
2O
2 (
14). Earlier
reports have shown that coimmobilized enzyme systems give a
higher efficiency and sensitivity and faster response time than
immobilized enzymes alone (
21). To provide oxygen for nitrite
oxidation, we have coentrapped CPG-catalase and
N. vulgaris.
Injection of H
2O
2 and NaNO
2 gave a lower response than that
from H
2O
2 alone (Fig.
1, peaks b and c). Therefore, NaNO
2 may
have an inhibitory effect on catalase activity. This was confirmed
by the large negative signal induced by injection of NaNO
2 with
continuous H
2O
2. The subsequent recovery from inhibition suggests
a reversible NaNO
2-catalase inhibition (Fig.
1, e and f). Previous
researches also showed that catalase (
31) and other ferriheme-containing
enzymes (
40) were inhibited by millimolar NaNO
2. Consequently,
catalase or hemoglobin (data not shown) was not as efficient
as an oxygen source. We therefore selected the PDMS copolymer
Q2-5247 (
11). With immobilized cells, the gel matrix becomes
a barrier to the mass transfer of both oxygen and NaNO
2. Coentrapment
of the anion exchanger shown here is to facilitate the permeation
of NaNO
2 into the gel. Thus, with the G-3 gel the signal was
3.7 times more than from gel G-1 (Fig.
2 and
3). Based on our
results, we can speculate that the NO
3 formed by oxidation
competes with and replaces the adsorbed NO
2 from DEAE-Sephadex.
Ion exchangers have also been used for the removal of ammonia
from wastewater (
16). DEAE Sephadex has no oxygen carrier capacity,
while PDMS copolymer does (Table
2).
PDMS copolymer in the gel G-4 further increased nitrite-oxidizing activity. It was not feasible to use higher concentration of PDMS copolymer, because this inhibited the polymerization process used. Previous research in the lab showed that at least 15% copolymer was needed to improve glucose oxidase activity (11). Figure 3 showed the rate of catalysis rose linearly as NaNO2 increased up to 200 mM and then leveled off. This behavior is in agreement with Michaelis-Menten kinetics.
Coimmobilization of PDMS copolymer also improved the storage stability over a period of 60 days. A long operational and storage stability is a very important property for practical biosensor applications and in continuous wastewater treatment plants. The half time for the immobilized cell activity in Nitrosomonas europaea immobilized with calcium alginate was only
10 day at +4°C (33).
We have achieved the goal of this work, which was to enhance the nitrification by N. vulgaris coimmobilized in polyacrylamide with PDMS copolymer and DEAE-Sephadex. We demonstrated this by using the flow injection analytical scale system assisted by thermal measurements. Gel G-4 can now also be used in a scaled-up system in the form of a bioreactor for a continuous conversion of toxic NaNO2 to less-toxic nitrate, with on-line thermal monitoring. Of three Nitrobacter spp. strains used for nitrite analysis (without enhancer), Nitrobacter vulgaris was shown to be most suitable (25). Mixed populations of immobilized nitrifiers have been widely used for cleaning of different types of wastewaters, but nitrification was not found to be enhanced by any additional agents (28), in contrast to our present work. In the Czech Republic, Chemopetrol A.S. Litvinov operates pilot units for nitrogen removal with encapsulated nitrifiers using LentiKats technology, but also without additives, for improving their performance.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Kemira Kemi AB for financial support, Bengt Danielsson
for permission to use the enzyme thermistor, and Simon Gough
for critical reading of the manuscript. We are also grateful
to Dow Corning for providing us with the PDMS copolymer (Q2-5247
fluid).

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Pure and Applied Biochemistry, Lund University, Box 124, 221 00 Lund, Sweden. Phone: 46 46 2228258. Fax: 46 46 2224611. E-mail:
estera.dey{at}tbiokem.lth.se.


REFERENCES
1 - Bakker, W. A. M., K. Patrick, H. H. Beeftink, J. Tramper, and C. D. de Gooijer. 1996. Nitrite conversion by immobilized Nitrobacter agilis cells in an air-lift loop bioreactor cascade: effects of combined substrate and product inhibition. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 81:390-393.[CrossRef]
2 - Bock, E., H. P. Koops, and H. Harms. 1986. Cell biology of nitrifiying bacteria, p. 17-38. In J. I. Prosser (ed.), Nitrification. IRL Press, Oxford, England.
3 - Bock, E., H. P. Koops, U. C. Möller, and M. Rudert. 1990. A new facultatively nitrite oxidizing bacterium Nitrobacter vulgaris sp. nov. Arch. Microbiol. 153:105-110.[CrossRef]
4 - Burrell, P., J. Keller, and L. L. Blackall. 1999. Characterization of the bacterial consortium involved in nitrate oxidation in activated sludge. Water Sci. Technol. 39:45-52.
5 - Cetinus, S. A., and H. N. Öztop. 2003. Immobilization of catalase into chemically crosslinked chitosan beads. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 32: 889-894.
6 - Danielsson, B., and B. Mattiasson. 1996. Thermistor-based biosensors, p. 495-512. In R. F. Taylor and J. S. Schultz (ed.), Handbook of chemical and biological sensors. Institute of Physics Publishing Ltd., London, England.
7 - Danielsson, B., K. Gadd, B. Mattiasson, and K. Mosbach. 1977. Enzyme thermistor determination of glucose in serum using immobilized glucose oxidase. Clin. Chim. Acta 81:163-175.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 - Danielsson, B., and K. Mosbach. 1987. Theory and application of calorimetric sensors, p. 575-582. In A. P. F. Turner, I. Karube, and G. S. Wilson (ed.), Biosensors: fundamentals and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
9 - Daverio, E., F. Aulenta, J. Ligthart, C. Bassani, and A. Rozzi. 2003. Application of calorimetric measurements for biokinetic characterisation of nitrifying population in activated sludge. Water Res. 37:2723-2771.[Medline]
10 - de Gooijer, C. D., R. H. Wijffels, and J. Tramper. 1991. Growth and substrate consumption of Nitrobacter agilis cells immobilized in carrageenan. Part 1: dynamic modelling. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 38:224-231.[CrossRef]
11 - Dey, E. S., O. Norrlöw, and Y. Liu. 2003. Artificial carrier for oxygen supply in biological systems. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 64:187-191.
12 - Elibol, M. 2001. Improvement of antibiotic production by increased oxygen solubility through the addition of perflurodecalin. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 76:418-422.[CrossRef]
13 - Grunditz, C., and G. Dalhammar. 2001. Development of nitrification inhibition assays using pure cultures of Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter. Water Res. 35:433-440.[Medline]
14 - Holst, O., S. O. Enfors, and B. Mattiasson. 1982. Oxygenation of immobilized cells using hydrogen-peroxide; a model study of Gluconobacter oxydans converting glycerol to dihydroxyacetone. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 14:64-68.[CrossRef]
15 - Hunik, J. H., H. J. G. Meijer, and J. Tramper. 1993. Kinetics of Nitrobacter agilis at extreme substrate, product and salt concentrations. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 40:442-448.
16 - Jorgensen, T. C., and L. R. Weatherley. 2003. Ammonia removal from wastewater by ion exchange in the presence of organic contaminants. Water Res. 37:1723-1728.[Medline]
17 - Lai, L.-S. T., L. H. Tsai, and T. C. Wang. 2002. Application of oxygen vectors to Aspergillus terreus cultivation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 94:453-459.
18 - Leaf, C. D., and S. R. Tannenbaum. 1996. The role of dietary nitrate and nitrite in human cancer, p. 317-324. In R. W. Watson and S. I. Mufti (ed.), Nutrition and cancer prevention. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.
19 - Leenen, E. J. T. M., A. M. G. A. van Boxtel, G. Englund, J. Tramper, and R. H. Wijffels. 1997. Reduced temperature sensitivity of immobilized Nitrobacter agilis cells caused by diffusion limitation. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 20:573-580.[CrossRef]
20 - Leonhardt, A., E. Szwajcer, and K. Mosbach. 1985. The potential use of silicon compounds as oxygen carriers for free and immobilized cells containing L-amino acid oxidase: a model study using the bacteria Providencia sp. PCM 1298. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 21:162-166.[CrossRef]
21 - Mattiasson, B. 1977. Biochemical applications and perspectives of immobilized multistep enzyme systems, p. 253-269. In T. M. S. Chang (ed.), Biomedical applications of immobilized enzymes and proteins. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
22 - Miller, J. N., and J. C. Miller. 2000. Statistics and chemometrics for analytical chemistry, 4th ed., p. 252. Person Education Limited, London, England.
23 - Painter, H. A. 1997. Microbial transformations of inorganic nitrogen. Prog. Water Technol. 8:3-29.
24 - Rehak, N. N., and D. S. Young. 1978. Prospective applications of calorimetry in the clinical laboratory. Clin. Chem. 24:1414-1419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25 - Reshetilov, A. N., P. V. Iliasov, H. J. Knackmuss, and A. M. Boronin. 2000. The nitrite oxidizing activity of Nitrobacter strains as a base of microbial biosensor for nitrite detection. Anal. Lett. 33:29-41.
26 - Sakai, H., H. Horinouchi, Y. Masada, S. Takeika, E. Ikeda, M. Takaori, K.Kobayashi, and E. Tsuchida. 2004. Metabolism of hemoglobin-vesicles (artificial oxygen carriers) and their influence on organ functions in a rat model. Biomaterials 25:4317-4325.[CrossRef][Medline]
27 - Satoh, H., H. Ono, B. Rulin, J. Kamo, S. Okabe, and K. Fukushi. 2004. Macroscale and microscale analyses of nitrification and denitrification in biofilms attached on membrane aerated biofilm reactors. Water Res. 38:1633-1641.[Medline]
28 - Sievers, M., K.-D. Vorlop, J. Hahne, M. Schlieker, and S. Schaefer. 2003. Advanced nitrogen elimination by encapsulated nitrifiers. Water Sci. Technol. 48:19-26.
29 - Sundermeyer, H., and E. Bock. 1981. Characterization of the nitrite-oxidizing system in Nitrobacter, p. 317-324. In H. Bothe and A. Trebst (ed.), Biology of inorganic nitrogen and sulfur. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
30 - Thoeye, C., K. V. Eyck, D. Bixio, M. Weemaes, and G. D. Gueldre. 2003. Methods used for health risk assessment, p. 17-53. In R. Aertgeerts and A. Angelakis (ed.), State of the art report health risks in aquifer recharge using reclaimed water. World Health Organization, Copenhagen, Denmark.
31 - Titov, V. Y., and Y. M. Petrenko. 2003. Nitrite-catalase interaction as an important element of nitrite toxicity. Biochemistry (Moscow) 68:627-633.[CrossRef][Medline]
32 - Tramper, J., and A. W. A. DeMan. 1986. Characterization of Nitrobacter agilis immobilized in calcium alginate. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 8:472-476.[CrossRef]
33 - Tramper, J., G. Suwinska-Borowiec, and A. Klapwijk. 1985. Characterization of nitrifying bacteria immobilized in calcium alginate. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 7:155-160.[CrossRef]
34 - Tramper, J., and D. R. J. Grootjen. 1986. Operating performance of Nitrobacter agilis immobilized in carrageenan. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 8: 477-480.[CrossRef]
35 - Tsai, Y. L., S. M. Schlasner, and O. H. Tuovinen. 1986. Inhibitor evaluation with immobilized Nitrobacter agilis cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52:1231-1235.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36 - Tsien, H. C., R. Lambert, and H. Laudelout. 1968. Fine structure and the localization of the nitrite oxidizing system of Nitrobacter winogradskyi. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 34:483-494.
37 - Wang, J., S. Mo, J. W. Li, J. Porter, M. M. Musameh, and P. K. Dasgupta. 2002. Oxygen-independent poly(dimethylsiloxane)-based carbon-paste glucose biosensors. Biosensors Bioelectronics 17:999-1003.[CrossRef][Medline]
38 - Wijffels, R., and J. Tramper. 1995. Nitrification by immobilized cells. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 17:482-492.[CrossRef]
39 - Wijffels, R. H., D. C. D. Gooijer, S. Kortekaas, and J. Tramper. 1991. Growth and substrate consumption of Nitrobacter agilis cells immobilized in carrageenan. Part 2: model evaluation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 38:232-240.[CrossRef]
40 - Young, L. J., and L. M. Siegel. 1988. On the reaction of ferric heme proteins with nitrite and sulphite. Biochemistry 27:2790-2800.[CrossRef][Medline]
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2005, p. 5888-5892, Vol. 71, No. 10
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.71.10.5888-5892.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.