AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, K. G.
Right arrow Articles by Teske, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, K. G.
Right arrow Articles by Teske, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, K. G.
Right arrow Articles by Teske, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2005, p. 6383-6387, Vol. 71, No. 10
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.71.10.6383-6387.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

SHORT REPORT

Effects of Dissolved Sulfide, pH, and Temperature on Growth and Survival of Marine Hyperthermophilic Archaea

Karen G. Lloyd,1* Virginia P. Edgcomb,2 Stephen J. Molyneaux,2 Simone Böer,3 Carl O. Wirsen,2 Michael S. Atkins,2 and Andreas Teske1

Department of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599,1 Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543,2 Institute for Biology and Chemistry of the Ocean (ICBM), Department of Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany 283593

Received 1 November 2004/ Accepted 25 April 2005


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Media.
 Growth experiments.
 Survival experiments.
 pH experiments.
 Sulfide experiments.
 Conclusions.
 References
 
The ability of metabolically diverse hyperthermophilic archaea to withstand high temperatures, low pHs, high sulfide concentrations, and the absence of carbon and energy sources was investigated. Close relatives of our study organisms, Methanocaldococcus jannaschii, Archaeoglobus profundus, Thermococcus fumicolans, and Pyrococcus sp. strain GB-D, are commonly found in hydrothermal vent chimney walls and hot sediments and possibly deeper in the subsurface, where highly dynamic hydrothermal flow patterns and steep chemical and temperature gradients provide an ever-changing mosaic of microhabitats. These organisms (with the possible exception of Pyrococcus strain GB-D) tolerated greater extremes of low pH, high sulfide concentration, and high temperature when actively growing and metabolizing than when starved of carbon sources and electron donors/acceptors. Therefore these organisms must be actively metabolizing in the hydrothermal vent chimneys, sediments, and subsurface in order to withstand at least 24 h of exposure to extremes of pH, sulfide, and temperature that occur in these environments.


   INTRODUCTION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Media.
 Growth experiments.
 Survival experiments.
 pH experiments.
 Sulfide experiments.
 Conclusions.
 References
 
Laboratory-based physiological studies of hyperthermophilic archaea often take place under specific cultivation and growth conditions, with empirically optimized electron acceptors and donors, pH, temperature, and carbon sources (28). However, conditions in and around hydrothermal vents and hot springs are often dynamic, with steep chemical and temperature gradients and highly variable fluid flow (14). Hyperthermophilic archaea living in vent chimneys, basement basalt, or overlying seafloor sediments are exposed in various degrees to the combined effects of high temperature, low pH, high concentrations of sulfide, and fluctuating levels of carbon and energy sources. Understanding the tolerance limits of known vent microorganisms under in situ chemical and physical stresses allows a more detailed definition of the environmental niches they are capable of occupying. This may also help inform investigations of the putative deep subsurface biosphere. The existence of such a microbial ecosystem is indicated by the diverse communities flushed out in various hydrothermal fluids (9, 31, 32).

We examined growth and nongrowth survival of four species of anaerobic hyperthermophilic archaea with combinations of high sulfide concentrations, low pHs, and high temperatures. Methanocaldococcus jannaschii, a methanogen, Archaeoglobus profundus, a sulfate reducer, and Thermococcus fumicolans and Pyrococcus sp. strain GB-D, both sulfur reducers, represent some of the dominant anaerobic physiological types in hydrothermal vent environments (7, 33).

M. jannaschii, an obligate H2-CO2 autotroph, was first isolated from hydrothermal vent sediments at 21°N East Pacific Rise (13). Close relatives of this type strain have also been obtained from hydrothermal vents in Guaymas Basin (38) and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (12). In addition, small subunit 16S rRNA sequences closely related to that of M. jannaschii have been found in hydrothermal vent fluids and a sulfide chimney from the Juan de Fuca Ridge (10) and the Kairei hydrothermal vent field (32). M. jannaschii has an optimal doubling time of 26 min at 85°C, with a maximum growth temperature of 88°C (13). A. profundus, an acetate-utilizing mixotroph, has been isolated from hydrothermal vent chimney material and sediments at Guaymas Basin (2) and from deep North Sea oil reservoirs (29). Cultures and 16S rRNA sequences from the genus Archaeoglobus have been retrieved from hydrothermal vent environments at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (26), the Juan de Fuca Ridge (27), the Guaymas Basin (35), and the Kairei hydrothermal vent field (32). A. profundus has an optimal doubling time of 4 h at 82°C and pH 6.5, with a maximum growth temperature of 90°C (2). T. fumicolans and Pyrococcus strain GB-D were originally isolated from chimney fragments in the North Fiji Basin (6) and Guaymas Basin (11), respectively. Pyrococcus strain GB-D has a maximum doubling time of 36 min at 95°C and has a maximum growth temperature of 103°C (11). T. fumicolans has a maximum doubling time of 86 min at 85°C and can grow in temperatures up to 103°C (6). Closely related organisms have also been found via culturing and molecular methods in nearly all of the well-studied marine hydrothermal vents (25). Members of the genus Thermococcus are among the most frequently recovered archaea in hydrothermal vent chimneys and subsurface areas (33).

Since M. jannaschii and A. profundus grow well at 82°C and T. fumicolans and Pyrococcus strain GB-D grow well at 90°C, we used these as control growth temperatures in our experiments. Cultures were incubated at 88°C (for M. jannaschii and A. profundus) and 100°C (for T. fumicolans and Pyrococcus strain GB-D) to determine the effect of heat shock on their tolerance to various pH values and/or sulfide concentrations. Growth and survival for M. jannaschii and A. profundus were tested at a pH range of 4.5 to 6.5 and a sulfide range of 0 mM to 80 mM, similar to the observed ranges for hydrothermal vent fluid discharges (37). Sulfide refers to H2S, HS–, and S2–, although at low pH values, H2S is expected to be the dominant form, with a pKa (H2S-HS–) of 7.1 (30). Growth and survival of T. fumicolans and Pyrococcus strain GB-D were tested at a pH range of 4.5 to 7.5. Growth and survival experiments were conducted over periods of 12 to 24 h, since control experiments showed that all strains grew by 2 orders of magnitude within this time period under optimized culture conditions.


   Media.
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Media.
Growth experiments.
 Survival experiments.
 pH experiments.
 Sulfide experiments.
 Conclusions.
 References
 
M. jannaschii, A. profundus, and T. fumicolans were obtained from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSMZ) (Braunschweig, Germany). Pyrococcus strain GB-D was isolated and maintained in our laboratory (11). For M. jannaschii and A. profundus, growth medium consisted of DSMZ medium 282 (http://www.dsmz.de/media/med282.htm) modified with 25 g/liter NaCl, 4.0 g/liter MgCl2 · 6H2O, and 3.3 mM (final concentration) citrate buffer, with both 1.0 g/liter sodium acetate and 0.5 g/liter yeast extract (Difco) added for A. profundus. Anoxic growth media were pressurized to 3 atm with 4:1 (vol/vol) H2-CO2. For T. fumicolans and Pyrococcus strain GB-D, growth media consisted of half-strength marine broth 2216 (Difco) diluted into Turk's Island artificial seawater (11) and supplemented with ~1% (wt/vol) elemental sulfur. For media at pH 7.5, 6.93 g/liter PIPES [piperazine-N,N'-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid)] buffer was used; all lower pH values were buffered with 0.82 g/liter CH3COONa. Anoxic survival media consisted of DSMZ medium 282 seawater, for M. jannaschii and A. profundus, or Turk's Island artificial seawater, for T. fumicolans and Pyrococcus strain GB-D, containing no carbon or energy sources, under an N2 atmosphere. All growth and survival media were prepared under N2, with 1 mg/ml of the redox indicator resazurin, and were reduced with 96 mg/liter Na2S · 9H2O. This minimal concentration of sulfide (0.4 mM) was required to keep the media reduced.


   Growth experiments.
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Media.
 Growth experiments.
Survival experiments.
 pH experiments.
 Sulfide experiments.
 Conclusions.
 References
 
For growth experiments, freshly grown cells were diluted to between 105 and 106 cells/ml into Hungate tubes containing growth media. For sulfide experiments, the growth media were adjusted to a sulfide concentration of 0.4, 20, 40, 60, or 80 mM at a pH of 6.0 for M. jannaschii and 6.5 for A. profundus. Sulfide concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically (3). For growth experiments at a range of pH values, the pH of the growth media was adjusted to 4.5, 5.0, or 6.0 for M. jannaschii and A. profundus, as well as pH 6.5 for A. profundus and pH 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, or 7.5 for T. fumicolans and Pyrococcus strain GB-D. The pH was checked before and after growth at pH 5.0, 6.0, and 6.5 (for M. jannaschii and A. profundus) and at pH 4.5 and 5.0 (for T. fumicolans and Pyrococcus strain GB-D) by using a sulfide-resistant pH electrode (model MP 220; Mettler-Toledo GmbH, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland), to make sure the values changed by no more than 0.3. After strains were incubated in 82°C-, 88°C-, 90°C-, or 100°C-water baths for 24 h (sulfide experiments) or 12 to 22 h (pH experiments), growth was assessed by direct counts of cells stained with acridine orange (8).


   Survival experiments.
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Media.
 Growth experiments.
 Survival experiments.
pH experiments.
 Sulfide experiments.
 Conclusions.
 References
 
For survival experiments, freshly grown cells (density, 0.5 x 108 to 1 x 108 cells/ml) were diluted to 106 cells/ml into Hungate tubes containing survival media. In this way, the inoculum volume and carbon carryover into the survival medium were limited to 0.1 ml, or 1% of the test volume. In some cases, cultures with lower cell densities allowed only for concentrations of 105 cells/ml in the Hungate tubes with survival media; inoculum volume was no greater than 0.2 ml, or 2%, to limit carbon carryover.

In our survival experiments, cell counts could not distinguish dead cells from living cells, since the morphology remained largely intact. Therefore, survival was assessed after 24 h by using a six-step decimal dilution series method. After exposure to stress conditions, cell suspensions were diluted into six-step decimal dilution series into complete growth medium and incubated at optimal temperature for up to 5 days. Tubes were checked daily for regrowth, on the basis of visible turbidity and microscopic examination. Data are presented as the highest decimal dilution step out of six steps in each dilution series that produced regrowth after each survival experiment. Selected single dilution series were checked for repeatability in triplicate most-probable-number experiments (data not shown).

For sulfide survival experiments, the media were adjusted to sulfide concentrations of 0.4, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 75 mM, at a pH of 6.0 for M. jannaschii and a pH of 6.5 for A. profundus. The media for pH survival experiments covered a pH range similar to that of the growth experiments (pH 4.5 to 6.5 for M. jannaschii and A. profundus; pH 4.5 to 7.5 for T. fumicolans and Pyrococcus strain GB-D). pH values were checked for consistency (within 0.3) before and after each experiment.


   pH experiments.
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Media.
 Growth experiments.
 Survival experiments.
 pH experiments.
Sulfide experiments.
 Conclusions.
 References
 
The in situ pH in the matrix of vent chimneys and in hydrothermally flushed sediments is a function of mixing of hydrothermal vent end-member fluid (pH, ca. 3 to 4) with near-neutral seawater (pH 7.8) (21). M. jannaschii, T. fumicolans, and Pyrococcus strain GB-D were all capable of growth at a pH as low as 4.5 at both temperatures. The lower pH limits of growth were not reached in these experiments; thus, it is possible that these organisms can tolerate even lower pHs. A. profundus, on the other hand, grew only at pH 5.5, at both 82°C and 88°C. The ability of M. jannaschii, T. fumicolans, and Pyrococcus strain GB-D to grow at lower pH values than A. profundus may indicate a difference in these organisms' environmental adaptations. Based on mixing model calculations for seawater and hydrothermal vent end-member fluid in vent chimney walls, seawater in-mixing raises the pH from typical end-member fluid values (~4) to 5.5 to 6.0 over a wide range of mixing ratios (21). The sensitivity of A. profundus to low pH indicates that it is adapted to habitats with seawater in-mixing, characterized by moderate pH and elevated sulfate concentrations. M. jannaschii, T. fumicolans, and Pyrococcus strain GB-D, however, are not dependent on sulfate, and their growth at pH 5.0 and below may indicate that they are better equipped to deal with low-sulfate, low-pH environments where seawater in-mixing is limited.

In most cases, temperature tolerances were not greatly affected by low pH. Growth and survival were similar at the two temperatures tested for M. jannaschii, A. profundus, and Pyrococcus strain GB-D. The same was true for T. fumicolans in growth experiments (Table 1). The only exception to this trend is T. fumicolans in survival experiments, which lost its high temperature tolerance at every pH tested. With the exception of the T. fumicolans survival results, the stresses of low pH do not seem to greatly impair temperature tolerance.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Effect of pH on the growth and survival of M. jannaschii, A. profundus, T. fumicolans, and Pyrococcus strain GB-D at optimal (82°C or 90°C) and superoptimal (88°C or 100°C) temperatures with and without nutrients

 
When deprived of the energy and carbon sources necessary for growth (H2 and CO2 for M. jannaschii; H2, CO2, yeast extract, and acetate for A. profundus; and sulfur and yeast extract for T. fumicolans and Pyrococcus strain GB-D), M. jannaschii and T. fumicolans did not survive at pH 4.5 (Table 1), in contrast to having good growth under the same conditions in growth medium. M. jannaschii did not survive well at a pH of ≤6.0. In the absence of growth nutrients, T. fumicolans lost all temperature tolerance and could not survive at any of the pH values tested when at 100°C. A. profundus had variable survival below pH 5.5, in agreement with its poor growth at low pH. Pyrococcus strain GB-D was more resistant than the others to low pH, starvation, and high temperature. It survived and grew in the full range of temperatures and pH values tested. Apparently, Pyrococcus strain GB-D is more tolerant of harsh fluctuations in hydrothermal vent conditions than are the other test organisms.


   Sulfide experiments.
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Media.
 Growth experiments.
 Survival experiments.
 pH experiments.
 Sulfide experiments.
Conclusions.
 References
 
Sulfide in high concentrations is a characteristic feature of hydrothermal vents, where it contributes to alleviating the toxicity of metals by metal-sulfide complex formation (4). However, uncomplexed sulfide has been shown to be highly toxic to methanogenic archaea (19, 23, 24). At the control temperature (82°C), both M. jannaschii and A. profundus were able to grow over 24 h at very high sulfide levels, up to 80 mM and 60 mM, respectively (Table 2). These sulfide tolerances far exceed the 4- to 8-mmol/kg sulfide concentrations measured for vent end-member fluid from the sites where these archaea were originally isolated, at 21°N East Pacific Rise, and at Guaymas Basin, respectively (37). This high sulfide tolerance may favor wide dispersal and distribution of M. jannaschii and A. profundus, since sulfide concentrations as high as 110 mmol/kg have been measured at other hydrothermal vents (reviewed in reference 14).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Effect of sulfide on the growth and survival of M. jannaschii and A. profundus at optimal (82°C) and superoptimal (88°C) temperatures with and without nutrients

 
High-temperature stress (88°C) limited the range of sulfide concentrations in which M. jannaschii and A. profundus could grow over 24 h (Table 1). At 88°C, the maximum sulfide concentration at which M. jannaschii was capable of growth was reduced to 40 mM. Similarly, A. profundus responded to 88°C with a decrease in the growth limit to 20 mM sulfide. Although high temperatures decreased their sulfide tolerance limits, both organisms were capable of growth at sulfide concentrations much higher than those present at their vents of origin. High sulfide tolerances have also been noted for the hyperthermophiles Pyrococcus strain GB-D (44 mM) and Desulfurococcus sp. strain SY (90 mM) (11).

Without energy and carbon sources, M. jannaschii and A. profundus were less tolerant of sulfide over 24 h (Table 2). At 82°C, both strains lost viability at moderate sulfide concentrations. At 88°C, survival of both strains was more sensitive to high sulfide concentration exposure than at 82°C; 24-h exposure resulted in essentially complete mortality at sulfide concentrations above 10 mM for both species. Nongrowing cells of M. jannaschii and A. profundus were much less able to withstand high sulfide concentrations than cells that were well supplied with electron donors and carbon substrates. These effects were magnified when the temperature was increased to 88°C.

The growth of M. jannaschii and T. fumicolans under conditions of high temperature and low pH contrasts with lack of survival of the organisms under the same temperature and pH conditions but without nutrients. Similarly, growth of M. jannaschii and A. profundus under conditions of high temperature and high sulfide concentrations contrasts with the inability of the organisms to survive under the same conditions but without nutrients. As a caveat, the limits of pH tolerance for Pyrococcus strain GB-D were not reached in this experiment.

The ability of actively growing cells to withstand greater stresses than carbon- and energy-deprived cells indicates that essential stress adaptation mechanisms require a basic carbon and energy supply. The starved cells in our study could have been unable to adequately maintain essential enzymatic activities and structural components. This, in turn, weakens the cellular defenses against a wide range of physiological stress factors, such as pH, high sulfide concentrations, and high-temperature shocks.

When under heat stress, many hyperthermophilic archaea synthesize heat shock proteins, or chaperonins, which act as molecular chaperones stabilizing cellular components (17, 36). For example, Archaeoglobus fulgidus, a close relative to A. profundus, expresses two chaperonin subunits, cpn{alpha} and cpnß, at temperatures near 89°C (5). M. jannaschii has been found to express the chaperonin HSP16.5, which is activated at 85°C (15, 16). However, these adaptation mechanisms to high temperatures, as well as other physiological defenses against different stress factors (e.g., pH and sulfide), are likely to break down without a basic nutrient supply.


   Conclusions.
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Media.
 Growth experiments.
 Survival experiments.
 pH experiments.
 Sulfide experiments.
 Conclusions.
References
 
The physiological responses of A. profundus, M. jannaschii, T. fumicolans, and Pyrococcus strain GB-D were studied under combinations of extremes of pH, temperature, and sulfide concentrations, with and without carbon substrates and electron donors/acceptors. Previous studies have shown that some stress factors at hydrothermal vents alleviate each other. For example, high metal and sulfide concentrations can be tolerated by M. jannaschii, T. fumicolans, and Pyrococcus strain GB-D due to the formation of metal-sulfide complexes (4). Elevated seafloor and subseafloor hydrostatic pressures may also increase the tolerances of some archaea to hydrothermal vent conditions (1, 20, 22). In addition, biofilm formation and attachment to mineral surfaces may allow hydrothermal vent archaea to expand the range of tolerable temperature, pH, and sulfide stresses (18, 27).

Pyrococcus strain GB-D is more tolerant to acidic and high-temperature conditions than are the other organisms and therefore may be able to access areas in the hydrothermal vent subsurface or chimneys that are exposed to vent fluids less diluted by seawater. This finding agrees with clone libraries that retrieved members of the Thermococcales on the internal chimney walls nearest to the hydrothermal vent fluid conduit (27, 34). We found that the negative effects of high temperature and high sulfide concentrations tend to compound each other for M. jannaschii and A. profundus. The greatest decrease in tolerance to adverse conditions in our study occurred when the archaea were deprived of electron acceptors, electron donors, and carbon substrates. Without energy and carbon sources, nongrowing cells of M. jannaschii, A. profundus, and T. fumicolans could not survive the stress levels that they tolerated easily as growing cells. Thus, the responses of these archaea to stress factors depend primarily on active metabolism and the ability to synthesize new biomolecules; extended survival in a nongrowing, metabolically inactive, suspended state appears improbable in environmental extremes found in hydrothermal vent environments.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Lis Suefke for excellent technical assistance.

This study was supported by the NSF (Life in Extreme Environments grant OCE-0085534 to A.T., S.J.M., S.B., K.G.L., S.B., and C.O.W.), the MBL (Environmental Genomes, S/C NCC2-1054) and URI (Subsurface Biospheres) NASA Astrobiology Institute Teams (A.T. and S.J.M.), an NSF Postdoctoral Fellowship in Microbial Biology (M.S.A.), and an NRC Astrobiology postdoctoral fellowship (V.P.E.). We thank the Seaver Foundation for funding equipment and baseline experiments.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: CB# 3300, Department of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina—Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599. Phone: (919) 966-5965. Fax: (919) 962-1254. E-mail: klloyd{at}email.unc.edu. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Media.
 Growth experiments.
 Survival experiments.
 pH experiments.
 Sulfide experiments.
 Conclusions.
 References
 

  1. Bartlett, D. H. 2002. Pressure effects on in vivo microbial processes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1595:367-381.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Burggraf, S., H. W. Jannasch, B. Nicolaus, and K. O. Stetter. 1990. Archaeoglobus profundus sp. nov., represents a new species within the sulfate-reducing archaebacteria. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 13:24-28.
  3. Cline, J. D. 1969. Spectrophotometric determination of hydrogen sulfide in natural waters. Limnol. Oceanogr. 14:454-458.
  4. Edgcomb, V., S. J. Molyneaux, M. A. Saito, K. Lloyd, S. Böer, C. O. Wirsen, M. S. Atkins, and A. Teske. 2004. Sulfide ameliorates metal toxicity for deep-sea hydrothermal vent archaea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:2551-2555.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Emmerhoff, O. J., H.-P. Klenk, and N.-K. Birkeland. 1998. Characterization and sequence comparison of temperature-regulated chaperonins from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus. Gene 215:431-438.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Godfroy, A., J.-R. Meunier, J. Guezennec, F. Lesongeur, G. Raguénès, A. Rimbault, and G. Barbier. 1996. Thermococcus fumicolans sp. nov., a novel hyperthermophilic archaeon isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent in the North Fiji Basin. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 46:1113-1119.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Harmsen, H. J. M., D. Prieur, and C. Jeanthon. 1997. Distribution of microorganisms in deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimneys investigated by whole-cell hybridization and enrichment culture of thermophilic subpopulations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:2876-2883.[Abstract]
  8. Hobbie, J. E., R. J. Daley, and S. Jasper. 1977. Use of Nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33:1225-1228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Holden, J. F., M. Summit, and J. A. Baross. 1998. Thermophilic and hyperthermophilic microorganisms in 3-30°C hydrothermal fluids following a deep-sea volcanic eruption. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 25:33-41.[CrossRef]
  10. Huber, J. A., D. A. Butterfield, and J. A. Baross. 2002. Temporal changes in archaeal diversity and chemistry in a mid-ocean ridge subseafloor habitat. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:1585-1594.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Jannasch, H. W., C. O. Wirsen, S. J. Molyneaux, and T. A. Langworthy. 1992. Comparative physiological studies on hyperthermophilic archaea isolated from deep-sea hot vents with emphasis on Pyrococcus strain GB-D. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:3472-3481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Jeanthon, C., S. L'Haridon, N. Pradel, and D. Prieur. 1999. Rapid identification of hyperthermophilic methanococci isolated from deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 49:591-594.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Jones, W. J., J. A. Leigh, F. Mayer, C. R. Woese, and R. S. Wolfe. 1983. Methanococcus jannaschii sp. nov., an extremely thermophilic methanogen from a submarine hydrothermal vent. Arch. Microbiol. 136:254-261.[CrossRef]
  14. Kelley, D. S., J. A. Baross, and J. R. Delaney. 2002. Volcanoes, fluids, and life at mid-ocean ridge spreading centers. Annu. Rev. Earth Plant Sci. 30:385-491.[CrossRef]
  15. Kim, D. R., I. Lee, S. C. Ha, and K. K. Kim. 2003. Activation mechanism of HSP16.5 from Methanococcus jannaschii. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 307:991-998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Kim, R., K. K. Kim, H. Yokota, and S.-H. Kim. 1998. Small heat shock protein of Methanococcus jannaschii, a hyperthermophile. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:9129-9133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Laksanalamai, P., and F. T. Robb. 2004. Small heat shock proteins from extremophiles: a review. Extremophiles 8:1-11.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. LaPaglia, C., and P. L. Hartzell. 1997. Stress-induced production of biofilm in the hyperthermophile Archaeoglobus fulgidus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:3158-3163.[Abstract]
  19. Maillacheruvu, K. Y., and G. F. Parkin. 1996. Kinetics of growth, substrate utilization and sulfide toxicity for propionate, acetate, and hydrogen utilizers in anaerobic systems. Water Environ. Res. 68:1099-1106.[CrossRef]
  20. Marteinsson, V. T., P. Moulin, J.-L. Birrien, A. Gambacorta, M. Vernet, and D. Prieur. 1997. Physiological responses to stress conditions and barophilic behavior of the hyperthermophilic vent archaeon Pyrococcus abyssi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:1230-1236.[Abstract]
  21. McCollom, T. M., and E. L. Shock. 1997. Geochemical constraints on chemolithoautotrophic metabolism by microorganisms in seafloor hydrothermal systems. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 61:4375-4391.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Miller, J. F., N. N. Shah, C. M. Nelson, J. M. Ludlow, and D. S. Clark. 1988. Pressure and temperature effects on growth and methane production of the extreme thermophile Methanococcus jannaschii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54:3039-3042.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. O'Flaherty, V., T. Mahony, R. O'Kennedy, and E. Colleran. 1998. Effect of pH on growth kinetics and sulphide toxicity thresholds of a range of methanogenic, syntrophic and sulphate-reducing bacteria. Process Biochem. 33:555-569.[CrossRef]
  24. Oleszkiewicz, J. A., T. Marstaller, and D. M. McCartney. 1989. Effects of pH on sulfide toxicity to anaerobic processes. Environ. Technol. Lett. 10:815-822.
  25. Reysenbach, A.-L., D. Götz, and D. Yernool. 2002. Microbial diversity of marine and terrestrial thermal springs, p. 345-421. In J. T. Staley and A.-L. Reysenbach (ed.), Biodiversity of microbial life: foundation of Earth's biosphere. Wiley-Liss, Inc., New York, N.Y.
  26. Reysenbach, A.-L., K. Longnecker, and J. Kirshtein. 2000. Novel bacterial and archaeal lineages from an in situ growth chamber deployed at a Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydrothermal vent. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:3798-3806.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Schrenk, M. O., D. S. Kelley, J. R. Delaney, and J. A. Baross. 2003. Incidence and diversity of microorganisms within the walls of an active deep-sea sulfide chimney. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:3580-3592.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Stetter, K. O. 1999. Extremophiles and their adaptation to hot environments. FEBS Lett. 452:22-25.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Stetter, K. O., R. Huber, E. Blochl, M. Kurr, R. D. Eden, M. Fielder, H. Cash, and I. Vance. 1993. Hyperthermophilic archaea are thriving in deep North Sea and Alaskan oil reservoirs. Nature 365:743-745.
  30. Stumm, W., and J. J. Morgan. 1981. Aquatic chemistry: an introduction emphasizing chemical equilibria in natural waters, 2nd ed, p. 129. John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
  31. Summit, M., and J. A. Baross. 2001. A novel microbial habitat in the mid-ocean ridge subseafloor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:2158-2163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Takai, K., T. Gamo, U. Tsunogai, N. Nakayama, H. Hirayama, K. H. Nealson, and K. Horikoshi. 2004. Geochemical and microbiological evidence for a hydrogen-based, hyperthermophilic subsurface lithoautotrophic microbial ecosystem (HyperSLiME) beneath an active deep-sea hydrothermal field. Extremophiles 8:269-282.[Medline]
  33. Takai, K., F. Inagaki, and K. Horikoshi. 2004. Distribution of unusual archaea in subsurface biosphere, p. 369-381. In W. S. D. Wilcock, E. F. DeLong, D. S. Kelley, J. A. Baross, and S. C. Cary (ed.), The subseafloor biosphere at mid-ocean ridges, geophysical monograph vol. 144. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.
  34. Takai, K., T. Komatsu, F. Inagaki, and K. Horikoshi. 2001. Distribution of archaea in a black smoker chimney structure. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:3618-3629.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Teske, A., K.-U. Hinrichs, V. Edgcomb, A. de Vera Gomez, D. Kysela, S. P. Sylva, M. L. Sogin, and H. W. Jannasch. 2002. Microbial diversity of hydrothermal sediments in the Guaymas Basin: evidence for anaerobic methanotrophic communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:1994-2007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Trent, J. D. 1996. A review of acquired thermotolerance, heat-shock proteins, and molecular chaperones in archaea. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 18:249-258.
  37. Von Damm, K. L. 1990. Seafloor hydrothermal activity: black smoker chemistry and chimneys. Annu. Rev. Earth Plant Sci. 18:173-204.[CrossRef]
  38. Zhao, H., A. G. Wood, F. Widdel, and M. P. Bryant. 1988. An extremely thermophilic Methanococcus from a deep sea hydrothermal vent and its plasmid. Arch. Microbiol. 150:178-183.[CrossRef]

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2005, p. 6383-6387, Vol. 71, No. 10
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.71.10.6383-6387.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, K. G.
Right arrow Articles by Teske, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, K. G.
Right arrow Articles by Teske, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, K. G.
Right arrow Articles by Teske, A.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals