Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2005, p. 6423-6426, Vol. 71, No. 10
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.71.10.6423-6426.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Reduction of Uranium(VI) Phosphate during Growth of the Thermophilic Bacterium Thermoterrabacterium ferrireducens
T. V. Khijniak,1
A. I. Slobodkin,1
V. Coker,2
J. C. Renshaw,2
F. R. Livens,2
E. A. Bonch-Osmolovskaya,1
N.-K. Birkeland,3
N. N. Medvedeva-Lyalikova,1 and
J. R. Lloyd2*
Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 7/2 Prospect 60-letiya Oktyabrya, Moscow 117312, Russia,1
The Williamson Research Centre for Molecular Environmental Science and The School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom,2
Department of Biology, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7800, N-5020 Bergen, Norway3
Received 14 March 2005/
Accepted 30 April 2005

ABSTRACT
The thermophilic, gram-positive bacterium
Thermoterrabacterium ferrireducens coupled organotrophic growth to the reduction
of sparingly soluble U(VI) phosphate. X-ray powder diffraction
and X-ray absorption spectroscopy analysis identified the electron
acceptor in a defined medium as U(VI) phosphate [uramphite;
(NH
4)(UO
2)(PO
4) · 3H
2O], while the U(IV)-containing precipitate
formed during bacterial growth was identified as ningyoite [CaU(PO
4)
2 · H
2O]. This is the first report of microbial reduction
of a largely insoluble U(VI) compound.

INTRODUCTION
The capacity to enzymatically reduce U(VI) has been demonstrated
for a range of Fe(III)-reducing and sulfate-reducing bacteria
(
8,
9). Mesophilic representatives of the genera
Geobacter,
Shewanella, and
Desulfotomaculum are known to couple U(VI) reduction
to growth, while
Desulfovibrio species reduce U(VI) but do not
obtain energy to support growth from this process (
10,
14,
17,
18). Only a few thermophilic microorganisms have been shown
to reduce U(VI) enzymatically, including
Thermus scotoductus,
Pyrobaculum islandicum, and
Thermoanaerobacter sp. (
5,
6,
15),
but conservation of energy for growth during U(VI) reduction
has not been demonstrated for any of these model organisms.
In all of the studies mentioned above U(VI) was supplied in
the form of soluble uranyl acetate, uranyl nitrate, or uranyl
chloride, which form soluble U(VI)-carbonate complexes in bicarbonate-buffered
medium.
Thermoterrabacterium ferrireducens is a thermophilic, gram-positive, anaerobic bacterium that is capable of organotrophic or lithoautotrophic growth with reduction of various electron acceptors, including Fe(III) (1, 2, 16). In order to determine the capacity of T. ferrireducens to reduce U(VI), fumarate-grown cultures (5%, vol/vol) were inoculated into anaerobic bicarbonate-buffered medium (pH 7.0) with glycerol (3 ml/liter) and yeast extract (0.2 g/liter; Sigma) as potential electron donors and uranyl acetate (2.5 mM; Aldrich-Sigma) as a potential electron acceptor. The medium composition and preparation protocols used were those described previously (16), except that Fe(III) oxide was omitted. No reducing agent was added to the medium. Uranyl acetate was added by syringe to sterilized medium from a 50 mM stock solution. All experiments were performed in 27-ml Balch tubes with 10 ml of the medium incubated at 65°C in the dark without agitation. For uranium determination, 1-ml samples were withdrawn at regular intervals, and 0.5-ml aliquots were used for analysis. Cell pellets and precipitates were separated from supernatants by centrifugation (10,000 x g, 5 min) and dissolved in 1 M HCl. U(VI) was quantified with 2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-diethylaminophenol at 578 nm (4). Samples were prepared in duplicate. Cells were counted by epifluorescence microscopy after acridine orange staining (3).
Immediately after injection of uranyl acetate into a test tube containing growth medium, a yellow precipitate formed. After 48 to 72 h of incubation, the color of the precipitates in the cultures of T. ferrireducens changed to gray, the U(VI) concentrations decreased, and significant bacterial growth was observed. The same processes repeatedly occurred after four subsequent 5% (vol/vol) transfers. No changes in precipitate appearance or U(VI) concentration were observed in abiotic control experiments (noninoculated medium). The yellow precipitate [analyzed immediately after addition of U(VI) or after 68 h of incubation in noninoculated medium] was identified by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) analysis as uranium phosphate [uramphite; (NH4)(UO2)(PO4) · 3H2O] (characteristic lines at 5.557, 3.799, 3.509, 3.279, 2.780, 2.179, 2.160, and 1.698 Å, with 40% or more intensity) (Fig. 1A), and the gray precipitate formed during bacterial growth on this solid-phase mineral was identified as ningyoite [CaU(PO4)2 · H2O] (characteristic reflections corresponding to 4.333, 3.022, 2.809, 2.349, 2.128, 1.844, 1.736, and 1.691 Å) (Fig. 1B). X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy carried out on station 16.5 at the Daresbury Synchroton Radiation Source showed that the gray precipitate contained uranium in the tetravalent oxidation state, while extended X-ray absorption fine-structure spectroscopy (EXAFS) analysis confirmed the presence of coordinated phosphate (Fig. 1C). Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) of air-dried samples revealed that in noninoculated medium uranium phosphates and other elements formed a uniform mixture of crystals (Fig. 1D), while bacterial cultures contained round, uranium-containing particles (Fig. 1E). ESEM cryostage investigations performed to avoid possible artifacts during air drying confirmed the presence of round particles in the microbially formed precipitate (Fig. 1F).
Within 68 h, approximately 80 to 90% of the hexavalent uranium
was reduced by growing cultures of
T. ferrireducens when 1 or
2.5 mM U(VI) was added to the cultivation medium (Fig.
2). No
uranium reduction and no bacterial growth were detected with
5 or 10 mM U(VI), suggesting that there was toxicity at these
higher concentrations. As evident from data for the U(VI) distribution
between the liquid phase and precipitates, at a uranium concentration
of 1 or 2.5 mM, almost all of the hexavalent uranium was precipitated
by phosphate (2.4 mM PO
43 supplied in the medium) (Fig.
2). Thus,
T. ferrireducens reduced U(VI) that was predominantly
present as solid uramphite. Low concentrations of U(VI) present
in the liquid were also reduced (Fig.
2).
T. ferrireducens used U(VI) as an electron acceptor during growth
(Fig.
3). U(VI) reduction was coupled to an increase in the
cell number, and the final cell yield was about 2.5-fold higher
in the presence of U(VI) than it was in U(VI)-free controls.
The degree of stimulation of growth by uranium was the same
in basal medium and in medium prereduced with Na
2S ·
9H
2O (final concentration, 0.5 g/liter; E
h, <110 mV),
indicating that U(VI) reduction, and not the change in E
h due
to tetravalent uranium formation, was responsible for the increased
cell yields. Unlike the growth with other electron acceptors
utilized by
T. ferrireducens [Fe(III) and fumarate], growth
with U(VI) started after a lag phase of about 15 h.
In this work microbial reduction of a sparingly soluble uranium
compound was demonstrated. Extracellular reduction has been
established previously for transition metals [e.g., insoluble
Fe(III) or Mn(IV) oxides] but not for actinide elements. Indeed,
intensive studies of the mechanisms of electron transfer to
Fe(III) or Mn(IV) (
11,
12) have shown a range of mechanisms
for reduction of these substrates, and some of these mechanisms
may also be appropriate for U(VI) minerals. However, it has
been reported that at uranium-contaminated sites, solid-phase
U(VI) present in sediments is resistant to microbial reduction
(
13), although this form of U(VI) could be potentially bioavailable
based on the results of our experiments. Furthermore, to date,
the only product of microbial U(VI) reduction that has been
reported is uraninite (UO
2) (
7,
9), although our studies suggest
that U(IV) calcium phosphate (ningyoite) can also be an end
product of this form of microbial metabolism. In conclusion,
this is the first report of a thermophilic microorganism (
T. ferrireducens) conserving energy for growth via U(VI) reduction.
Thus, the results of this study extend the limited number of
known uranium-reducing microorganisms and demonstrate that there
are biogenic transformations of U phosphate minerals that may
take place in uranium ore deposits and uranium-contaminated
environments.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by INTAS grant 01-151, by CRDF grant
RB2-2379-MO-02, by the Russian Science Support Foundation, and
by the program "Molecular and Cell Biology" of the Russian Academy
of Sciences.
We are grateful to CLRC for XAS beamtime allocations.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: The Williamson Research Centre for Molecular Environmental Science and The School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 161 275 7155. Fax: 44 161 275 3947. E-mail:
jon.lloyd{at}manchester.ac.uk.


REFERENCES
1 - Gavrilov, S. N., E. A. Bonch-Osmolovskaya, and A. I. Slobodkin. 2003. Physiology of organotrophic and lithotrophic growth of the thermophilic iron-reducing bacteria Thermoterrabacterium ferrireducens and Thermoanaerobacter siderophilus. Microbiology (Engl. Transl. Mikrobiologiya) 72:132-137.
2 - Henstra, A. M., and A. J. M. Stams. 2004. Novel physiological features of Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans and Thermoterrabacterium ferrireducens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:7236-7240.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Hobbie, J. E., R. H. Daley, and S. Jasper. 1977. Use of Nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33:1225-1228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Johnson, D. A., and T. M. Florence. 1971. Spectrophotometric determination of uranium(VI) with 2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-diethylaminophenol. Anal. Chim. Acta 53:73-79.[CrossRef]
5 - Kashefi, K., and D. R. Lovley. 2000. Reduction of Fe(III), Mn(IV), and toxic metals at 100oC by Pyrobaculum islandicum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:1050-1056.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Kieft, T. L., J. K. Fredrickson, T. C. Onstott, Y. A. Gorby, H. M. Kostandarithes, T. J. Bailey, D. W. Kennedy, Li, S. W., A. E. Plymale, C. M. Spadoni, and M. S. Gray. 1999. Dissimilatory reduction of Fe(III) and other electron acceptors by a Thermus isolate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:1214-1221.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Lloyd, J. R., J. Chesnes, S. Glasauer, D. J. Bunker, F. R. Livens, and D. R. Lovley. 2002. Reduction of actinides and fission products by Fe(III)-reducing bacteria. Geomicrobiol. J. 19:103-120.
8 - Lovley, D. R., E. P. Phillips, Y. A. Gorby, and E. R. Landa. 1991. Microbial reduction of uranium. Nature 350:413-416.[CrossRef]
9 - Lovley, D. R., and E. J. Phillips. 1992. Reduction of uranium by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:850-856.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Lovley, D. R., E. E. Roden, E. J. P. Phillips, and J. C. Woodward. 1993. Enzymatic iron and uranium reduction by sulfate-reducing bacteria. Mar. Geol. 113:41-53.
11 - Nealson, K. H., A. Belz, and B. McKee. 2002. Breathing metals as a way of life: geobiology in action. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 81:215-222.
12 - Nevin, K. P., and D. R. Lovley. 2002. Mechanisms for Fe(III) oxide reduction in sedimentary environments. Geomicrobiol. J. 19:141-159.[CrossRef]
13 - Ortiz-Bernad, I., R. T. Anderson, H. A. Vrionis, and D. R. Lovley. 2004. Resistance of solid-phase U(VI) to microbial reduction during in-situ bioremediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:7558-7560.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Pietzsch, K., and W. Babael. 2003. A sulfate-reducing bacterium that can detoxify U(VI) and obtain energy via nitrate reduction. J. Basic Microbiol. 4:348-361.[CrossRef]
15 - Roh, Y., S. V. Liu, Li, G., H. Huang, T. J. Phelps, and J. Zhou. 2002. Isolation and characterization of metal-reducing Thermoanaerobacter strains from deep subsurface environments of the Piceance Basin, Colorado. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:6013-6020.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16 - Slobodkin, A. I., A.-L. Reysenbach, N. Strutz, M. Dreier, and J. Wiegel. 1997. Thermoterrabacterium ferrireducens gen. nov., sp. nov., a thermophilic anaerobic, dissimilatory Fe(III)-reducing bacterium from a continental hot spring. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47:541-547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Tebo, B. M., and A. Y. Obraztsova. 1998. U(VI) sulfate-reducing bacterium grows with Cr(VI), Mn(IV), and Fe(III) as electron acceptors. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 162:193-198.[CrossRef]
18 - Wade, R., and T. J. DiChristina. 2000. Isolation of U(VI) reduction-deficient mutants of Shewanella putrefaciens. FEMS Microbiol. Let. 184:143-148.[CrossRef][Medline]
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2005, p. 6423-6426, Vol. 71, No. 10
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.71.10.6423-6426.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Smeaton, C. M., Weisener, C. G., Burns, P. C., Fryer, B. J., Fowle, D. A.
(2008). Bacterially enhanced dissolution of meta-autunite. American Mineralogist
93: 1858-1864
[Abstract]
[Full Text]