Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 2005, p. 6545-6553, Vol. 71, No. 11
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.71.11.6545-6553.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control State Key Joint Laboratory, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, Peoples Republic of China
Received 19 February 2005/ Accepted 6 June 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The discovery of allelopathythe suppression of neighboring plant growth by the release of toxic compounds (7)hinted that the antialgal allelochemicals produced by macrophytes might be used as algal growth inhibitors in algal control (5, 14, 38, 41). Macrophytes and algae are known to have an antagonistic relationship in aquatic ecosystems (14, 15, 16, 34, 41, 42). Several experiments have been carried out to evaluate the algal inhibition activity of some macrophytes. The ethyl ether fraction of an extract from a culture solution of the well known troublesome floating macrophyte water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) inhibited Chlorella pyrenoidosa and three other species of algae (43). According to Nakai et al. (25) Cabomba caroliniana and Myriophyllum spicatum inhibited Selenastrum capricornutum and Microcystis aeruginosa coexisting in a culture. Further research studies showed that polyphenols were antialgal allelochemicals and the concentration of polyphenols in M. spicatum was much higher than those in other observed submersed macrophytes of other families (13, 15, 16, 27). Accordingly, a good possibility exists that the growth of noxious algae can be controlled by using antialgal allelopathic compounds extracted from macrophytes. Traditional approaches have focused on the isolation of allelopathic compounds from submerged plants (26, 28) and floating plants (43). There are few evaluations of the antialgal allelopathic potential of emerged macrophytes (18, 34).
Determination of the mode of action of allelochemicals is a challenging endeavor due to the multitude of potential molecular targets. There are no established protocols or standard methods to study the modes of the action of allelochemicals. Each research team develops their own approach that best addresses their needs, and teams often rely on methods with which they are most comfortable. Dehydrozaluzanin C, a natural sesquiterpene lactone, causes rapid plasma membrane leakage in cucumber cotyledon disks (9). The essential oil extracted from palmarosa (Cymbopogon martinii) causes the proportion of membrane fatty acids to change (33). Many kinds of allelochemicals are also known to affect the mitosis of plants (4, 31). The allelochemical fischerellin A, produced by a cyanobacterium of Fischerella muscicola, can inhibit the photosystem II of several plants (17, 39). The activities of enzymes were also affected by allelopathic compounds (8, 23). In photosynthetic organisms, environmental stress can create oxidative stress through increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), e.g., singlet oxygen (1O2), hydroxyl radical (HO·), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (2). Reactive oxygen species may cause lipid peroxidation (3), whereas superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) inhibit lipid peroxidation (36). There are no studies reporting whether or not allelochemicals increase the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). In oxidative conditions, plants and microalgae respond by increasing antioxidant defenses, notably enzymes such as SOD and POD. However, excessive ROS may cause a decrease of SOD and POD activities (25).
Our previous research (20, 21) revealed that Phragmites communis demonstrated a very high inhibition activity on the growth of C. pyrenoidosa and M. aeruginosa. Although the controlling of algal growth by adding biomass of P. communis directly to a water body is possible, much research must be carried out to make this a safe and effective method for aquatic ecosystem management. Essential tasks include (i) revealing the allelopathic compounds released from P. communis, (ii) demonstrating the different antialgal activity on different algae species of the compounds, and (iii) exploring the mechanism of the action of the allelochemicals. In the present study, a novel allelochemical was extracted from P. communis. The antialgal activity and the mode of action of the allelochemical were also investigated.
|
|
|---|
Extraction and separation of allelochemicals from P. communis.
Specimens of P. communis were dried at 60°C for 48 h. The specimens were ground up to fine powder and soaked in 8 liters of ethanol for 24 h at 25°C in the dark. The ethanol extract was separated by using filtration and further fractionated by the following procedure (Fig. 1).
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Flow chart of the isolation procedure used in the present study.
|
Bioassay.
The allelopathic potential of the crude extract and isolated fractions (fractions E, F, G, H, and I) was evaluated by algal bioassays with C. pyrenoidosa, C. vulgaris, and M. aeruginosa. Ethanol solutions (0, 0.2, and 1 ml) of crude extract or isolated fractions were added to Erlenmeyer flasks containing 5 ml of algal inoculant and 195 ml of culture medium. Three replicates were prepared for each treatment. The algae were cultured under 90 µmol of photons m2 s1 (light-dark = 14 h-10 h) at 25°C for 96 h.
Dose-response studies.
Effects of different concentrations of the isolated allelochemical and synthesized allelochemical on the growth of C. pyrenoidosa, C.vulgaris, and M. aeruginosa were studied. Different concentration allelochemical (0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 1, 2, 3, and 4 mg/liter) were added to Erlenmeyer flasks containing 5 ml of algal inoculant and 195 ml of culture medium. The algal density was 106 cell/liter level at the beginning of the growth cycle. The algae were cultured under 90 µmol of photons m2 s1 (light-dark = 14 h-10 h) at 25°C for96 h.
Mode of action of allelochemical.
In the present study, we investigated the changes of metal ion leakage, membrane fatty acids, and antioxidant enzyme activity caused by allelochemical.
The changes in metal ion leakage of C. pyrenoidosa caused by different concentrations of allelochemical with various contact time were studied. C. pyrenoidosa was cultured to log time (108 cells/liter) followed by the addition of different concentration allelochemical (0, 0.5, and 2 mg/liter). The contact times were 0, 30, 60, and 120 min, respectively. After the addition of the allelochemical, the algal cultures were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 min, and the concentration of K+ in the supernatant was measured. In a control experiment, the algal cells were heated for 10 min in boiling water to completely destroy the cell membrane absolutely and get the maximum sequestered ions in the algal cells (24). All of the experiments were carried out in triplicate.
In another set of experiments, the effects of different concentrations of allelochemical on the ion leakage of C. pyrenoidosa, C. vulgaris, and M. aeruginosa were studied. C. pyrenoidosa, C. vulgaris, and M. aeruginosa were cultured to log time (108 cells/liter) and then 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, or 4 mg of allelochemical/liter was added to the algal cultures, followed by a culture for 120 min in the dark. The cultures were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 min, and the concentrations of K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ in the supernatant were measured. In a control experiment, the algal cells were heated for 10 min in boiling water to completely destroy the cell membrane and get the maximum sequestered ions in the algal cells.
Effects of different concentrations of allelochemical on the activity of SOD and POD of C. pyrenoidosa, C. vulgaris, and M. aeruginosa were studied. The algae were precultured to log time (the algal density was ca. 108 cells/liter), and then the allelochemical was added. The allelochemical concentrations were 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 mg/liter. The contact time was 24 h in the dark. Then the cultures were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 min to obtain the algal cells for the POD and SOD activity analysis.
The changes in membrane fatty acids caused by the allelochemical were evaluated. The algae were precultured to ca. 108 cells/liter. The allelopathic fraction I was then added to the culture, followed by incubation for 24 h. The alga membrane fatty acids were extracted and measured. A control (without allelochemical) was run in parallel. Algal cells were harvested by centrifugation at 3,000 rpm for 5 min at 4°C and then washed in distilled water thrice. Three replicates were prepared for each treatment. Extraction of membrane fatty acids, preparation of their methyl esters, and final extraction with ether were conducted according to the method of Rose and Veazey (37) but modified by sonication of cells under nitrogen at 14 MHz for 10 min (Soniprep 150; MSE) prior to alkaline saponification. Totals of 2 ml of 2 M KOH in 95% (vol/vol) methanol and 2 ml of benzene were added to the sonicated cells. The headspace was filled with N2 gas, and the mixture was incubated at 80°C for 3 h. On cooling, an equal volume of methanol was added, and the nonsaponified fraction was extracted by shaking with three successive 5-ml aliquots of petroleum ether (60 to 80°C fraction). The lower methanol layer was acidified with 6 M HCl, and the saponified lipids were extracted with petroleum ether (three aliquots of 5 ml). The saponified lipid fraction was evaporated and then derivatized to methyl esters by the addition of 1 ml of 14% BF3 in methanol. The headspace was filled with N2 gas, sealed, and heated at 80°C for 1 h. The contents were added to 5 ml of distilled water and extracted thrice with 5 ml of petroleum ether. The pooled ether fractions were concentrated and analyzed.
Three replicates were given for each treatment in all of the experiments.
Analytical methods.
The algal numbers were counted by using a hemacytometer. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) were used in the identification of allelochemicals. The constituents of fraction I were analyzed by GC-MS. The GC apparatus used was a Perkin-Elmer 8600 fitted with flame ionization detector. An SE-54 quartz capillary column (30 m) was used. The column temperature was initially held at 60°C for 2 min and then programmed to increase to 300°C at a rate of 5°C/min. The injector temperature was maintained at 280°C, and the injection volume was 1 ml with the splitless mode. Constituents were identified by peak matching against standards in the NIST 95 Computer Library. The relative amounts of constituents were calculated by integrating all peaks with areas of >1%.
NMR analyses of the allelochemicals were carried out on a Pulse Fourier Transform Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscope (PFT-NMR; JOEL JNM-ECA300 spectrometer, 300 MHz 1H, CDCl3). 1H NMR was recorded on a 2.5-mm inverse detection microprobe head. All chemical shifts are reported as relative
values.
The concentrations of K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ in the supernatant were measured by using inductively coupled plasma-MSy (ICP-MS; VG Elemental PQ ExCell ICP-MS). A 500-µl sample of the supernatant was added to 100 µl of internal standard and diluted with 5 ml of 1% ultrapure double-distilled nitric acid. Metal concentrations were calculated by using the ion mass per 109 cells.
The POD activity was obtained by measuring the oxidation of ascorbate in the presence of H2O2 (29). The algal sample was ground in liquid nitrogen and extracted in 2.5 ml of 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 10% (wt/vol) polyvinylpyrrolidone-40, 0.25% Triton X-100, and 0.5 mM ascorbate. The extraction was then centrifuged for 5 min at 14,000 rpm at 4°C in order to eliminate debris (Sigma Laborzentrifugen). The oxidation of ascorbate was initiated by adding 50 µl supernatant to 950 µl potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0, 50 mM) containing 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM ascorbate, and 0.1 mM H2O2. After 30 s of the reaction, the decrease in absorbance at 290 nm was measured with a spectrophotometer. The assay was performed at 20°C. One unit of POD was defined as the variance of absorbance per 107 cells (
A470/107 cells).
SOD activity was measured according to the method of Paoletti et al. (32) based on the inhibitory action of the enzyme on the rate of NADH oxidation. The algal sample was ground in liquid nitrogen and extracted in 3 to 5 ml of 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 10% polyvinylpyrrolidone-40 and 0.25% Triton X-100. The extract was centrifuged for 5 min at 14,000 rpm at 4°C. The supernatant was used for the SOD analysis. For the measurement of SOD activity, the reaction buffer (700 µl) was prepared with 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 0.1 mM EDTA, 18 µM cytochrome c, and 0.1 mM xanthine. Xanthine oxidase was added to the reaction buffer to get an increase of absorbance at 550 nm of ca. 0.025 min1 at 25°C. Then, 15 to 100 µl of supernatant sample and H2O was added to the reaction buffer, including xanthine oxidase, to give a volume of 800 µl. The rate of cytochrome c was measured at 550 nm for an additional minute. One unit of SOD was defined as the variance of absorbance per min per 107 cells (
A550/min 107 cells).
Fatty acids were analyzed by GC-MS. The conditions of GC-MS were the same as those used for the identification of allelochemicals.
Data analysis.
Allelopathic activity on growth inhibition was estimated by inhibition ratio (IR), which is defined as follows: IR = [1 (N/N0)] x 100, where N0 and N are the numbers of cells in the control and extract-added cultures, respectively.
Origin7.0 software (OriginLab Corp.) was used in calculating the algal growth rate (r) and log time (t). Statistical analysis of data was performed by using the Kruskal-Wallis and/or Student t test.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (51K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Inhibitory effect on growth of C. pyrenoidosa in fractions. CK, control; Et, ethanol without extracted fractions; E to I, extracted fractions. All error bars correspond to the standard deviation.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Summary of inhibitory effects of fractions F and I on C. pyrenoidosa, C. vulgaris, and M. aeruginosa
|
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Effect of treatment time on potassium and calcium leakage from cells of C. pyrenoidosa for groups treated with 0.5 and 2 mg of fraction I/liter. B, cells were heated for 10 min in boiling water to completely destroy the cell membrane absolutely. The culture time was 120 min after fraction I added. All error bars correspond to the standard deviation.
|
![]() View larger version (42K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Effect of fraction I concentration on potassium leakage from cells of C. pyrenoidosa, C. vulgaris, and M. aeruginosa. B, cells were heated for 10 min in boiling water to completely destroy the cell membrane absolutely. Culture time was 120 min after fraction I added. All error bars correspond to the standard deviation.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Effect of fraction I on fatty acids extracted from C. pyrenoidosa, C. vulgaris, and M. aeruginosa
|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. POD and SOD activity changes caused by fraction I. All error bars correspond to the standard deviation.
|
4.2(m, 4H), 3.5(m, 2H), 2.24 (s, 1H), 1.35(m, 3H), and 1.28(m, 3H)]. The result of 1H and C NMR (Fig. 7B) revealed that the compound (80%) was EMA.
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. The results of GC-MS analysis of fraction I. (A) Gas chromatogram; (B) mass spectrum of compound with a retention time of 9.58 min; (C) mass spectrum of compound with a retention time of 11.56 min.
|
![]() ![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Result of 1H and 13C NMR analysis of allelopathic EMA in fraction I (PFT-NMR, JOEL JNM-ECA300 spectrometer, 300 MHz, CDCl3).
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Inhibitory effect on the growth of C. pyrenoidosa and M.aeruginosa by synthesized EMA. All error bars correspond to the standard deviation.
|
|
|
|---|
EMA significantly inhibited the growth of C. pyrenoidosa and M. aeruginosa. The EC50 of EMA was 0.49 mg/liter for C.pyrenoidosa and 0.65 mg/liter for M. aeruginosa (Table 3). The EC50 of other reported antialgal allelochemicals shown in Table 3 were higher than 0.5 mg/liter except for catechol. The antialgal activity of EMA was stronger than those of other allelochemicals.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Comparison of activities of EMA with other reported antialgal allelochemicals or algicidals
|
The fatty acid composition of microbial cell membranes affects their ability to survive in various environments (11). The ratio of saturated to unsaturated fatty acids can change in response to environmental conditions. An environment containing EMA increased the proportions of unsaturated fatty acids of the algal cell membrane, leading to increases in membrane fluidity and hence membrane channels.
Allelopathic EMA caused plasma membrane leakage in C.pyrenoidosa and M. aeruginosa. Previous research claimed that many kinds of allelochemicals may cause rapid plasma membrane leakage in cucumber cotyledon disks (4, 9). Palmarosa oil decreased the proportions of unsaturated fatty acids and decreased the membrane integrity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (33). In the present study, higher concentrations of EMA (>0.5 mg/liter) decreased SOD and POD activity in C. pyrenoidosa and M. aeruginosa. These results indicated that the added allelochemical, which act as an environmental stress, created oxidative stress through increased production of ROS. In oxidative conditions, the algae responded by increasing antioxidant defenses, including SOD and POD. However, higher concentrations of allelochemical and the excessive ROS it creates resulted in decreased SOD and POD activity. The excessive ROS may cause lipid peroxidation (3, 6). The addition of EMA increased the total concentration of unsaturated lipid fatty acids in cell membrane of C. pyrenoidosa and M. aeruginosa. This caused a change in plasma membrane integrity. The loss of plasma membrane integrity caused the leakage of ions in the protoplast.
We thank Cheng-Dui Yang and Hai-Jun Yang (Analysis Center, Tsinghua University) for their kind support.
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»