Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2005, p. 8301-8304, Vol. 71, No. 12
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.71.12.8301-8304.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
A Broad-Host-Range, Generalized Transducing Phage (SN-T) Acquires 16S rRNA Genes from Different Genera of Bacteria
Amy Beumer* and
Jayne B. Robinson
University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Dayton, Ohio
Received 23 May 2005/
Accepted 10 August 2005

ABSTRACT
Genomic analysis has revealed heterogeneity among bacterial
16S rRNA gene sequences within a single species; yet the cause(s)
remains uncertain. Generalized transducing bacteriophages have
recently gained recognition for their abundance as well as their
ability to affect lateral gene transfer and to harbor bacterial
16S rRNA gene sequences. Here, we demonstrate the ability of
broad-host-range, generalized transducing phages to acquire
16S rRNA genes and gene sequences. Using PCR and primers specific
to conserved regions of the 16S rRNA gene, we have found that
generalized transducing phages (D3112, UT1, and SN-T), but not
specialized transducing phages (D3), acquired entire bacterial
16S rRNA genes. Furthermore, we show that the broad-host-range,
generalized transducing phage SN-T is capable of acquiring the
16S rRNA gene from two different genera:
Sphaerotilus natans,
the host from which SN-T was originally isolated, and
Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In sequential infections, SN-T harbored only 16S
rRNA gene sequences of the final host as determined by restriction
fragment length polymorphism analysis. The frequency of 16S
rRNA gene sequences in SN-T populations was determined to be
1
x 10
9 transductants/PFU. Our findings further implicate
transduction in the horizontal transfer of 16S rRNA genes between
different species or genera of bacteria.

INTRODUCTION
16S rRNA gene sequences are used extensively to construct phylogenetic
trees as well as in the study of microbial communities (
6).
These uses of the 16S rRNA gene have been based upon three assumptions.
First, most bacteria contain either a single 16S rRNA gene or
multiple genes that are highly similar. Second, there has been
no horizontal gene transfer (HGT) of these genes. Third, 16S
rRNA genes are unique to prokaryotes and mitochondria. Comparative
nucleotide sequence analysis has shown the first assumption
to be untrue. This was first reported as intraspecific variation
in small-subunit rRNA (
3). It is now recognized that many bacteria
possess more than one and up to 15 copies of the 16S rRNA gene
(
1,
9). Comparisons of 16S rRNA gene operons from strains belonging
to the same species have shown nucleotide differences ranging
from a single nucleotide difference in
Pseudomonas aeruginosa to 188 nucleotide differences in
Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis (
1). The causes of 16S rRNA gene heterogeneity are suggested
to be twofold: (i) misincorporation of nucleotides into DNA
during replication and (ii) horizontal gene transfer (
15). HGT
has been implicated in the transfer of an entire rRNA gene in
Thermomonospora chromogena (
18). Although HGT of 16S rRNA gene
sequences is accepted as a probable cause of 16S rRNA gene heterogeneity,
it is believed to occur at a low frequency. According to the
complexity hypothesis, because 16S rRNA genes interact with
several other gene products, they have a low probability of
successfully undergoing a transfer event (
7,
11). It has also
been suggested that even if 16S rRNA genes had a high frequency
of HGT, processes that normalize genes could mask this (
1).
Concerning the third assumption, bacteria are not the only organisms
in the environment harboring 16S rRNA gene sequences; phages
in soil have also been shown to contain 16S rRNA gene sequences
that are assumed to be of bacterial origin (
12). The presence
of 16S rRNA gene sequences in phages would likely add to the
overestimation of bacterial cells in microbial communities.
Broad-host-range, generalized transducing phages are a possible vector for the transfer of genes between strains, species, and even genera. In the past, it was thought that phages rarely, if at all, crossed species boundaries. However, it has recently been shown that cyanophages are capable of infecting across species (13). Because of their prevalence, it has been suggested that phages may play an important role in gene transfer in the environment. For example, in one study, 9 of 10 phages isolated from sewage were found to display a broad host range (8). One such broad-host-range phage is SN-T, a phage with a hexagonal head and a long flexible tail. SN-T was isolated from sewage and enriched on Sphaerotilus natans (16). In addition to S. natans, SN-T is capable of infecting Rhodospirillum rubrum, Shigella flexneri, Proteus vulgaris, P. aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli (8). While all the bacterial hosts of SN-T belong to the phylum Proteobacteria, they differ in classes, which include Gammaproteobacteria (S. flexneri, P. vulgaris, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa), Alphaproteobacteria (R. rubrum), and Betaproteobacteria (S. natans). Here, we report that the broad-host-range, generalized transducing phage SN-T can acquire 16S rRNA gene sequences from P. aeruginosa and S. natans. We have also determined the frequency of 16S rRNA gene acquisition by this phage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and bacteriophages.
To detect the presence of 16S rRNA gene sequences in phages,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and phages known to infect this
bacterium (D3112, UT1, SN-T, and D3) were used (Table
1).
P. aeruginosa was grown in LB medium or on LB 1.5% agar plates.
The broad-host-range, generalized transducing phage SN-T was
chosen and used in all sequential infection experiments because
it is capable of infecting both
P. aeruginosa and
Sphaerotilus natans ATCC 133388 (Table
1).
S. natans was cultivated on tryptone-yeast
(TY) 1.5% agar plates.
Phage preparation.
Phages were prepared using the top agar technique: 100 µl
of a known dilution of phage was mixed with an equal volume
of a culture of
P. aeruginosa grown in broth overnight or resuspended,
plate-grown cells of
S. natans. The mixture of bacterial host
and phage was immediately added to 4 ml of 0.7% top agar (LB
for
P. aeruginosa or TY for
S. natans). The top agars were poured
onto LB or TY 1.5% agar plates, and the plates were incubated
for 24 h at 37°C in the case of
P. aeruginosa or for 2 days
at room temperature for
S. natans. Control plates which contained
bacterial cells that had not been infected with phage were also
prepared; these will henceforth be referred to as "phage-free,
cell-only" controls. These phage-free, cell-only controls were
processed in parallel through the phage isolation protocol with
cells that had received phage. Phages were harvested by resuspending
the soft agar in 4 ml of LB or TY broth and vortexing to release
phage, followed by incubation on ice for 30 min. Bacterial cells
were then removed by room temperature centrifugation at 10,000
x g for 10 min. The supernatant was then filtered through a
0.2-µm filter and stored at 4°C. Sterility of phage
preparations was determined by plating 100 µl onto an
LB or TY plate and incubating at the appropriate temperature
and time. Phage preparations that were shown to be free of bacterial
host cells were used in subsequent infections and DNA preparations.
Sequential infection.
In order to determine whether a phage could acquire 16S rRNA gene sequences from two different genera, we used the broad-host-range, generalized transducing phage SN-T. Several different series of sequential infections were performed (Fig. 1). The phages harvested from these sequential infections were given designations based on the order of the bacterial host(s) used in the infection: SN-T
PP (P. aeruginosa infection twice in sequence), SN-T
SS (S. natans infection twice in sequence), SN-T
SP (S. natans infection followed by P. aeruginosa infection), and SN-T
PS (P. aeruginosa infection followed by S. natans infection). DNA was then extracted from all SN-T phage preparations as well as from the uninfected, cell-only controls.
DNA preparation and amplification by PCR.
Genomic DNA was isolated from
E. coli,
P. aeruginosa, and
S. natans cells according to the procedure described previously
by Woo et al. (
17).
To ensure that only phage DNA was obtained, SN-T lysates were treated with DNase I prior to lysis of phage particles and DNA extraction (2). Phage-free, cell-only controls were run in parallel. To test for the presence the entire 16S rRNA gene, the universal sequence primers 8F (5'-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3') and 1525R (5'-AAGGAGGTGATCCAGCC-3') were used (4; N. Pace, personal communication). This set of primers amplifies a 1,517-bp sequence. Taq DNA polymerase was used for the PCR amplifications to determine the presence of 16S rRNA gene sequences in phages; however, Accuprime Pfx DNA polymerase was used for amplification from SN-T for restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis because of its high fidelity. Thermocycler conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation step (94°C for 12 min) followed by 33 cycles of denaturation (94°C for 1 min), annealing (54°C for 45 s), and extension (72°C for 2 min). Finally, the tubes were incubated at 72°C for 12 min to ensure complete synthesis of the entire sequence.
P. aeruginosa or E. coli purified genomic DNA was used as a positive control in all PCRs. A negative control consisting of PCR mix with no DNA added was run to ensure that there were no contaminating 16S rRNA gene sequences in the reagents. Also, phage-free, cell-only controls were run in parallel with the phage-containing samples to again make certain that the DNase step was effective and that there were no contaminating bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences in the phage preparations.
RFLP analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences.
To determine the source of the bacterial donor 16S rRNA genes acquired by SN-T, the 1,517-bp PCR products were recovered from agarose gels and purified using a QIAEX II gel extraction kit. RFLP analysis was performed on the purified DNA fragments. The known 16S rRNA gene sequences from P. aeruginosa PAO1 (GenBank accession number NC_002516) and S. natans (accession number Z18534) were analyzed for restriction cut sites using NEB Cutter version 2.0 (http://tools.neb.com/NEBcutter2/index.php). A single unique enzyme that would result in two unique bands upon digestion of either P. aeruginosa or S. natans 16S rRNA gene sequences was identified (see Fig. 5). BamHI was predicted to cut the P. aeruginosa sequence once, producing two bands of 600 and 900 bp. AgeI was predicted to cut the S. natans sequence once, producing two bands of 1,300 and 200 bp. 16S rRNA gene sequences amplified from the genomic DNA of each bacterial donor were digested and analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. In both cases, the predicted bands were present. This allowed us to then analyze PCR-amplified 16S rRNA gene sequences acquired by SN-T to determine their bacterial origin.
Detection of frequency of 16S rRNA gene sequences in phage populations using PCR.
Viable phages of both SN-T

PP and SN-T

SS were enumerated using
standard PFU plate counts. Serial dilutions were then prepared,
and the DNA was extracted from 1 ml of lysates of each dilution
as described above. The highest dilution of phage to contain
16S rRNA gene sequences was determined by PCR.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Generalized transducing phages acquire 16S rRNA gene sequences.
16S rRNA gene PCR products of 1,517 bp, representing >99%
of the 16S rRNA gene, were amplified from the bacteriophage
genomic DNA of all generalized transducing phages: D3112, UT1,
and SN-T. In contrast, no PCR product was amplified from the
DNA of the specialized transducing phage D3 (Fig.
2 and
3).
That generalized transducing phage and not specialized transducing
phage carried 16S rRNA gene sequences was to be expected; this
further establishes the absence of contaminating 16S rRNA gene
sequences. Additionally, 16S rRNA gene PCR products were absent
in all phage-free, cell-only controls (Fig.
4) and in control
16S rRNA gene PCRs containing no DNA. The latter was important,
as we had found some commercial polymerases to be contaminated
with 16S sequences resulting in PCR products in the negative
PCR controls. This is not unusual, as Tanner et al. (
14) amplified
several different bacterial 16S rRNA genes from PCRs lacking
template DNA. Furthermore, Sander and Schmeiger (
12), who previously
showed that generalized transducing phages in activated sludge
contain 16S rRNA genes, found contaminating 16S rRNA gene sequences
to be a problem. We too detected 16S rRNA gene sequences in
phages isolated from wetland soil samples (data not shown) and
experienced problems with contaminating 16S rRNA gene sequences.
We did not detect 16S rRNA gene PCR products in our phage-free,
cell-only DNase-treated controls. Thus, we concluded that the
DNase treatment was effective at degrading exogenous DNA, which
would include any 16S rRNA gene sequences.
Source and frequency of 16S rRNA genes in SN-T phage populations.
Using RFLP analysis, we were able to determine the source of
the 16S rRNA gene sequence. We found that SN-T was able to acquire
either
P. aeruginosa or
S. natans 16S rRNA genes (Fig.
3). Therefore,
it is possible for a broad-host-range, generalized transducing
phage to acquire and carry 16S rRNA gene sequences from different
bacterial genera. Interestingly, in all sequential infections,
SN-T was found to contain the 16S rRNA gene sequence from the
bacterial host it had last infected and not more than one detectable
16S rRNA gene sequence (Fig.
5). However, the 16S rRNA gene
(8 to 1,525 bp) was detected only in SN-T populations containing
greater than or equal to 10
11 PFU/ml (Fig.
6). This was true
regardless of which host was used. Assuming that one copy of
the 16S rRNA gene sequence led to amplification and because
only 1/100 of the total DNA extracted from 1 ml of phage lysate
was used, the frequency of SN-T acquiring the 16S rRNA gene
is no less than 1 in 10
9 phages. This is comparable to the transduction
rate of 3
x 10
9 transductants/PFU for SN-T as determined
through auxotrophic conversion (
16). Since the PCR is not sensitive
enough to detect a single copy of a sequence, it is likely that
the actual frequency is actually higher and thus comparable
to transduction frequencies of 10
8 to 10
10 transductants/PFU
that have previously been reported for UT1 transduction of chromosomal
alleles in freshwater environments in
P. aeruginosa (
10). Thus,
our finding that SN-T contained 16S rRNA gene sequences only
from the final bacterial host was not surprising, given the
low frequency of 16S rRNA gene sequence acquisition by SN-T.
These results indicate that the mechanism of acquisition of
16S rRNA genes by SN-T is likely mistaken packaging of the bacterial
16S rRNA gene instead of phage genomic DNA.
Transduction frequency is also known to change with environmental
parameters and multiplicity of infection. To further understand
the frequency of broad-host-range phages acquiring 16S rRNA
gene sequences, various natural environmental conditions and
multiplicities of infection need to be studied.
Evolutionary and ecological implications.
We have demonstrated that a broad-host-range, generalized transducing phage can acquire and carry 16S rRNA gene sequences from bacteria belonging to different genera. We believe that SN-T is a good model phage and that P. aeruginosa and S. natans are good model hosts for the study of HGT for the following reasons. First, SN-T was isolated from sewage, and S. natans is also found in sewage and grows well in fully aerated and low-oxygen environments (5). Second, P. aeruginosa is ubiquitous in the environment, including sewage. Therefore, all of these organisms could be expected to cohabitate. Finally, P. aeruginosa and S. natans are from different classes of the phylum Proteobacteria; P. aeruginosa is classified as Gammaproteobacteria, while S. natans is classified as Betaproteobacteria. Thus, our model could be extended to study transduction under a variety of environmental conditions as well as to probe the ecological significance of 16S rRNA gene horizontal transfer via phages.
It has been suggested that HGT may contribute to the presence of heterogeneous 16S rRNA gene sequences in bacteria. Our results support this possibility, although the frequency of such events appears to be low. Furthermore, the presence of broad-host-range, generalized transducing phage carrying 16S rRNA gene sequences from more than one genera of bacteria could lead to a misrepresentation of microbial diversity in the environment. Sander and Schmeiger (12) found that phages isolated from sewage carry 16S rRNA gene sequences, and we have seen the same results in samples from wetland soils. Furthermore, our experiments show that phages can acquire 16S rRNA gene sequences from more than one genera of bacteria. Thus, assessment of a microbial community based on 16S rRNA gene sequences must take into account the presence of generalized transducing phages, especially those that are broad host range, in that community.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH 45469-1644. Phone: (937) 229-3630. Fax: (937) 229-2021. E-mail:
beumerae{at}notes.udayton.edu.


REFERENCES
1 - Acinas, S. G., L. A. Marcelino, V. Klepac-Ceraj, and M. F. Polz. 2004. Divergence and redundancy of 16S rRNA sequences in genomes with multiple rrn operons. J. Bacteriol. 186:2629-2635.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Ashelford, K. E., M. J. Day, M. J. Bailey, A. K. Lilley, and J. C. Fry. 1999. In situ population dynamics of bacterial viruses in a terrestrial environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:169-174.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Clayton, R. A., G. Sutton, P. S. Hinkle, Jr., C. Bult, and C. Field. 1995. Intraspecific variation in small-subunit rRNA sequences in GenBank: why single sequences may not adequately represent prokaryotic taxa. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45:595-599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - de la Torre, J. R., B. M. Goebel, E. I. Friedman, and N. R. Pace. 2003. Microbial diversity of cryptoendolythic communities from McMurdo Dry Valleys, Antarctica. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:3858-3867.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Dias, F. F., N. C. Dondero, and M. S. Finstein. 1968. Attached growth of Sphaerotilus and mixed population in continuous-flow apparatus. Appl. Microbiol. 16:1191-1199.[Medline]
6 - Head, I. M., J. R. Saunders, and R. W. Pickup. 1998. Microbial evolution, diversity, and ecology: a decade of ribosomal RNA analysis of uncultivated microorganisms. Microb. Ecol. 35:1-21.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 - Jain, R., M. C. Rivera, and J. A. Lake. 1999. Horizontal gene transfer among genomes: the complexity hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:3801-3806.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Jensen, E. C., H. S. Schrader, B. Rieland, T. L. Thompson, K. W. Lee, K. W. Nickerson, and T. A. Kokjohn. 1998. Prevalence of broad-host-range lytic bacteriophages of Sphaerotilus natans, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:575-580.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Rainey, F. A., N. L. Ward-Rainey, P. H. Janssen, H. Hippe, and E. Stackebrandt. 1996. Clostridium paradoxum DSM 7308T contains multiple 16S rRNA genes with heterogeneous intervening sequences. Microbiology 142:2087-2095.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Ripp, S., O. A. Ogunseitan, and R. V. Miller. 1994. Transduction of a freshwater microbial community by a new Pseudomonas aeruginosa generalized transducing phage, UT1. Mol. Ecol. 3(2):121-126.[Medline]
11 - Rivera, M. C., R. Jain, J. E. Moore, and J. A. Lake. 1998. Genomic evidence for two functionally distinct gene classes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:6239-6244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Sander, M., and H. Schmeiger. 2001. Method for host-independent detection of generalized transducing bacteriophages in natural habitats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:1490-1493.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Sullivan, M. B., J. B. Waterbury, and S. W. Chisholm. 2003. Cyanophages infecting the oceanic cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus. Nature 424:1047-1050.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 - Tanner, M. A., B. M. Goebel, M. A. Dojka, and N. R. Pace. 1998. Specific ribosomal DNA sequences from diverse environmental settings correlate with experimental contaminants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:3110-3113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Ueda, K., T. Seki, T. Kudo, T. Yoshida, and M. Kataoka. 1999. Two distinct mechanisms cause heterogeneity of 16S rRNA. J. Bacteriol. 181:78-82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16 - Winston V., and T. L. Thompson. 1979. Isolation and characterization of a bacteriophage specific for Sphaerotilus natans which contains an unusual base in its deoxyribonucleic acid. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 37:1025-1030.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Woo, T. H., A. F. Cheng, and J. M. Ling. 1992. An application of a simple method for the preparation of bacterial DNA. BioTechniques 13:696-698.[Medline]
18 - Yap, W. H., Z. Zhang, and Y. Wueng. 1999. Distinct types of rRNA operons exist in the genome of the actinomycete Thermomonospora chromogena and evidence for horizontal transfer of an entire rRNA operon. J. Bacteriol. 181:5201-5209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2005, p. 8301-8304, Vol. 71, No. 12
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.71.12.8301-8304.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Ghosh, D., Roy, K., Williamson, K. E., Srinivasiah, S., Wommack, K. E., Radosevich, M.
(2009). Acyl-Homoserine Lactones Can Induce Virus Production in Lysogenic Bacteria: an Alternative Paradigm for Prophage Induction. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
75: 7142-7152
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ghosh, D., Roy, K., Williamson, K. E., White, D. C., Wommack, K. E., Sublette, K. L., Radosevich, M.
(2008). Prevalence of Lysogeny among Soil Bacteria and Presence of 16S rRNA and trzN Genes in Viral-Community DNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 495-502
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Harth, E., Romero, J., Torres, R., Espejo, R. T.
(2007). Intragenomic heterogeneity and intergenomic recombination among Vibrio parahaemolyticus 16S rRNA genes. Microbiology
153: 2640-2647
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Simmon, K. E., Croft, A. C., Petti, C. A.
(2006). Application of SmartGene IDNS Software to Partial 16S rRNA Gene Sequences for a Diverse Group of Bacteria in a Clinical Laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 4400-4406
[Abstract]
[Full Text]