Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2005, p. 8402-8410, Vol. 71, No. 12
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.71.12.8402-8410.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Kathryn E. R. Davis,
Michelle Sait, and
Peter H. Janssen*
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
Received 21 June 2005/ Accepted 6 September 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hugenholtz et al. (20) divided the phylum Verrucomicrobia into five subdivisions on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence divergence. There are also some lineages that are only poorly represented by 16S rRNA gene sequences and have been given no uniform designations. Only very few cultured isolates and recognized species of the phylum Verrucomicrobia are known (7, 8, 12, 19, 21, 23, 34, 36, 38, 41, 45). Based on their detection in libraries of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA genes, members of the phylum Verrucomicrobia are very widely distributed and found in many different habitats (20, 31), including occurrences as symbionts (30, 45). 16S rRNA genes originating from members of the phylum Verrucomicrobia make up to 12% of all of the bacterial 16S rRNA genes detected in PCR-based surveys of soil bacterial communities (5). Most of the sequences originate from members of the class "Spartobacteria." One such 16S rRNA gene, designated EA25, was estimated to originate from a species with a population size of up to 2 x 108 cells per gram of soil (27) and therefore could represent 1 to 10% of all of the bacteria in that soil.
Members of the phylum Verrucomicrobia have been shown to make up 1 to 10% of the bacterial 16S rRNA in soils (4, 6). The member of the class "Spartobacteria" from which one 16S rRNA gene, designated DA101, originated, made up a significant part of bacterial 16S rRNA in another soil system (15, 16). It has been suggested that the amount of 16S rRNA, the product of the 16S rRNA gene, is indicative of bacterial activity (25). From estimates of the contribution of their 16S rRNA to the total 16S rRNA pool, it can be concluded that members of the phylum Verrucomicrobia are active members of the soil microbial community.
The evidence available therefore indicates that members of the phylum Verrucomicrobia are a globally distributed, abundant, and active group of soil bacteria. However, in the absence of cultivated isolates from soil, very little is known about the biology of members of this phylum. Although these bacteria are postulated to be important members of the soil microbial community (5), information on their roles and ecology is based only on correlations of their abundance, based on 16S rRNA, with environmental parameters (4). The complexity of soil microbial communities (9, 43) means that metagenomic approaches to studying soil bacteria and assembling genomes of uncultured bacteria to understand their physiologies seems impractical at present (44). To enable easier assessment of their roles, we have been attempting to isolate members of this phylum from soil. Here we report on a simple approach that generated a collection of new strains of the phylum Verrucomicrobia.
|
|
|---|
DNA extraction and PCR.
Soil cores were divided into 2-cm sections by depth (32). DNA was extracted from 1-g aliquots of sieved and mixed soil from each section as described by O'Farrell and Janssen (28) and 4 to 9 ng used per PCR. 16S rRNA genes of verrucomicrobia were amplified from this DNA by PCR using the primer pair VMB537f and VMB1295r (Table 1) as described by O'Farrell and Janssen (28). 16S rRNA genes from most bacteria were amplified by using the primer pair BAC27f and BAC1492r (Table 1). For this amplification, the PCR mixture contained PCR buffer (QIAGEN Pty., Ltd., Clifton Hill, Victoria, Australia), 1 µl of the template DNA, 1.25 mM MgCl2, 100 pmol of each primer, 1 M betaine, and 6.25% (vol/vol) dimethyl sulfoxide in a total volume of 40 µl overlaid with 2 drops of mineral oil (Promega Corp., Annandale, New South Wales, Australia). After heating at 94°C for 2 min, 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (QIAGEN) and 100 nmol of each deoxyribonucleoside phosphate were added to each reaction in a volume of 10 µl. Amplification occurred during 42 cycles consisting of annealing at 48°C for 15 s, extension at 72°C for 60 s, and denaturation at 94°C for 15 s. After 42 cycles, there was a final annealing step at 48°C for 90 s and a extension step at 72°C for 6 min.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Oligonucleotides used as probes for DNA-DNA hybridization or as primers for PCR-mediated amplification of 16S rRNA genes
|
Cultivation experiments.
Plate count experiments were prepared as described by Davis et al. (11). Four or six replicate experiments were set up with each medium, and each experiment consisted of three different inoculum levels, each with three or five replicate plates (11). The plates were incubated in sealed polyethylene bags at 25°C in the dark for up to 6 months. Some experiments were incubated at 25°C under an air atmosphere enriched with 5% (vol/vol) CO2 in a model 3157 CO2 incubator (Forma Scientific, Marietta, Ohio) that had been calibrated at 25°C by using a Fyrite CO2 analyzer (Bacharach, Pittsburgh, Pa.).
At 1-month intervals, the plates were viewed on a light box under a magnifying lens (up to x1.5 magnification), and visible colonies were counted. The significance of differences in viable counts was tested by using analysis of variance and two-tailed Student t tests.
Where required, colonies were subcultured onto the medium on which they first appeared but solidified with agar (11). Cultures were grown in liquid media as described by Sangwan et al. (36). Cell sizes were determined from phase-contrast photomicrographs (36).
Media.
Media were prepared as described by Joseph et al. (23). The media used were as follows: VL55 plus 0.05% (wt/vol) xylan; VL55 plus amino acid mix (23); VL55 plus 2 mM N-acetylglucosamine; VL55 plus a mix of D-glucose, D-galactose, D-xylose, and L-arabinose (0.5 mM [each]) (GGXA); and dilute nutrient broth (DNB). Media were solidified with 0.8% (wt/vol) gellan when used in plates (23). Cyclic AMP (Sigma, Castle Hill, New South Wales, Australia) was added as required to the cooled medium from a filter-sterilized (0.2-µm pore size) stock solution just prior to dispensing the medium into plates. "C. flavus" was grown to late exponential phase in liquid culture by using medium VL55 with 4 mM glucose (36). Culture supernatant from these liquid cultures was prepared by centrifugation to remove cells, followed by filter sterilization (0.2-µm pore size). The supernatant was added as required to the cooled medium just prior to dispensing the completed medium into plates. Medium stocks were adjusted so that the final concentrations of VL55 medium base, gellan, and substrate (xylan or amino acids) were the same as in parallel control experiments without the addition of culture supernatant.
Controls for hybridization.
To prepare some of the plasmid controls to act as hybridization controls, almost-complete 16S rRNA genes were PCR amplified (32) from pure cultures, A-tailed, ligated into the vector pGEM T-Easy (Promega, Annandale, New South Wales, Australia), and transformed into chemically competent E. coli JM109 (Promega) as recommended by the supplier. The pure cultures used were Verrucomicrobium spinosum DSM 4136, Planctomyces limnophilus DSM 3776, Haloferax volcanii NCIMB 2012, Opitutus terrae DSM 11246, Bradyrhizobium sp. strain Ellin153, Arthrobacter sp. strain Ellin159, and isolate Ellin202, which is a member of the phylum Bacteroidetes. The identity of the inserts was confirmed after amplification with the primers GEM189r (5'-AGCGGATAACAATTTCACACAGG-3') and GEM2987f (5'-CCCAGTCACGACGTTGTAAAACG-3'), which target regions of the vector flanking the cloning site. These products were then purified by using the UltraClean PCR Clean-up DNA Purification kit (MoBio Laboratories, Solana Beach, Calif.) according to the manufacturer's instructions and sequenced (32). Other controls were almost-complete 16S rRNA genes in the pGEM T-Easy vector (Table 2). These genes had been amplified by PCR from a sample of DNA extracted from soil from the Ellinbank sample site (L. Schoenborn and P. H. Janssen, unpublished data).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Plasmids bearing 16S rRNA genes used as positive and negative controls for testing the specificity of oligonucleotide probe hybridization, with the phylogenetic affiliations of the source organism of each gene, and whether it contains a target site for probes used in this studya
|
Oligonucleotide probe preparation.
Probes for DNA-DNA hybridization (Table 1) were purchased as high-pressure liquid chromatography-purified oligonucleotides from GeneWorks (Thebarton, South Australia, Australia) and labeled with a single digoxigenin molecule at the 3' terminus by using the DIG Oligonucleotide 3'-End Labeling Kit (Roche Diagnostics Australia, Castle Hill, New South Wales, Australia) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Hybridization methods to screen isolates.
Almost-complete 16S rRNA genes were amplified from isolates by PCR (32). Plasmids (ca. 3 ng) and PCR products (1 µl) were applied to 63-by-228-mm positively charged nylon membranes with a 0.45-µm pore size (Roche) and immobilized by cross-linking three times at the "optimal cross-link" setting in a XL-1000 Spectrolinker (Spectronics Corp., Westbury, N.Y.). Membranes were treated prior to hybridization in 40 ml of hybridization buffer (0.1% [wt/vol] N-lauroylsarcosine, 0.02% [wt/vol] sodium dodecyl sulfate, 1% [wt/vol] Blocking Reagent [Roche], 750 mM NaCl, and 75 mM citric acid [pH 7.0] with NaOH) at the hybridization temperature in a glass tube in a Shake'n'Stack hybridization oven (Hybaid). After at least 1 h, the hybridization buffer was replaced with fresh hybridization buffer containing the appropriate labeled oligonucleotide probe or probe suite at a total concentration of 5 pmol/ml, which was boiled for 10 min and then placed on ice for 5 min just before use. After overnight hybridization, the membrane was washed twice with concentrated wash solution (0.1% [wt/vol] sodium dodecyl sulfate, 300 mM NaCl, and 30 mM citric acid [pH 7.0] with NaOH) for 15 min each time on a rocking platform at room temperature. The membrane was then washed twice for 15 min each at the hybridization temperature in dilute wash solution (0.1% [wt/vol] sodium dodecyl sulfate, 75 mM NaCl, and 7.5 mM citric acid [pH 7.0] with NaOH) in a glass tube in a hybridization oven before being washed in blocking solution (1% [wt/vol] skim milk powder, 150 mM NaCl, and 100 mM maleic acid [pH 7.5] with NaOH) on a rocking platform for at least 1 h at room temperature. The blocking solution was replaced by fresh blocking solution containing 0.075 U of anti-digoxigenin-alkaline phosphatase Fab fragments (Roche) per milliliter and then incubated on a rocking platform for 30 min at room temperature. The membrane was then washed twice for 15 min each at room temperature in predetection washing buffer (0.3% [wt/vol] Tween 20, 150 mM NaCl, and 100 mM maleic acid [pH 7.5] with NaOH) before being incubated for 2 min at room temperature in detection buffer (100 mM NaCl and 100 mM Tris [pH 9.5] with HCl) and then placed between two sheets of polyethylene film. Chemiluminescent substrate solution, consisting of 250 µM disodium 3-(4- methoxyspiro{1,2-dioxetane-3,2'-(5'-chloro)tricyclo[3.3.1.13,7]decan}-4-yl)phenyl phosphate (CSPD; Roche) in detection buffer or 250 µM disodium 2-chloro-5-(4-methoxyspiro{1,2-dioxetane-3,2'-(5'-chloro)tricyclo[3.3.1.13,7]decan}-4-yl)-1-phenyl phosphate (CDP-Star; Roche) in detection buffer was added at 0.5 ml per 100 cm2 of membrane. The membrane was first incubated at room temperature for 5 min, after which it was placed between two fresh sheets of polyethylene film and, if CSPD was being used, incubated at 37°C for 15 min. The membrane was then exposed to Lumi-Film Chemiluminescent Detection Film (Roche) at room temperature overnight for CSPD or 20 to 40 min for CDP-Star.
Quantitative hybridization.
Plasmid controls were quantified by using the PicoGreen dsDNA Quantitation Kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oreg.). From the known plasmid and insert sizes, the number of targets in the standards was calculated. A series of four standards of between 108 and 109 target copies was prepared by dilution in water, and each was blotted in triplicate on each membrane. PCR products in which target copy number was to be estimated were purified by using the Ultraclean PCR Clean-up DNA Purification Kit (MoBio Laboratories, Inc., Solana Beach, Calif.) and diluted in water to yield four different dilutions that would yield hybridization signals comparable to those produced by the standards, and each was blotted onto the membrane in triplicate. Hybridization was carried out as described above.
Each PCR product was quantified by using the EUB338 probe, the VER727 probe, and the VER1112 probe, with a different membrane for each probe. The standards (Table 2) were pEllin153 for EUB338, pEB1106 for VER727, and pEB1116 for VER1112. The signal intensities were measured from scanned images of the exposed film by using NIH Image (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.), and the number of copies in the PCR product calculated from the standards. The number of targets detected using each of the latter two probes was expressed as a proportion of the target number estimated by using the EUB338 probe.
Phylogenetic analysis.
The primary sequences of 16S rRNA genes of cultured bacteria were determined as described by Sait et al. (32). The phylogenetic affiliations of these bacteria and of cloned 16S rRNA genes were deduced by using BLAST in GenBank (1). The 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained in the present study have been deposited in the GenBank databases under accession numbers AY960764 to AY960781 and DQ087988 to DQ088032. For more detailed phylogenetic analyses, 16S rRNA gene sequences were aligned against selected sequences extracted from GenBank, using the program ClustalX version 1.81 (42). This alignment was then manually checked and corrected, and regions of uncertain alignment eliminated, using the software SeAl version 1.d1 (A. Rimbaut, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom). Analyses of the isolates were restricted to the unambiguously aligned regions totaling 1,158 positions of the 16S rRNA gene. Evolutionary analyses were carried out with the PHYLIP package version 3.573c (J. Felsenstein, Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle [14]). Evolutionary distances between pairs of microorganisms were determined by the Jukes and Cantor method (24) and the maximum-likelihood method implemented in the Dnadist program, and dendrograms were derived with the Fitch and Neighbor programs, using the Fitch-Margoliash method (17) and a neighbor-joining algorithm (33), respectively. The significance of the nodes was tested by bootstrap analysis generating Jukes-Cantor evolutionary distances, using the least-squares and neighbor-joining algorithms to produce 1,000 dendrograms, and then compiling consensus dendrograms, using the programs Seqboot, Dnadist, Fitch, Neighbor, and Consense. Maximum-likelihood and maximum-parsimony analyses of the sequence data used the programs Dnaml and Dnapars, respectively. Dendrograms were represented graphically with the software TreeViewPPCversion 1.4 (R. D. M. Page, Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom). The topologies and bootstrap values of dendrograms produced by using different methods were not significantly different.
Identities between 16S rRNA genes were calculated from uncorrected distances by using ClustalX, after alignment of smaller sets of unedited sequences.
|
|
|---|
The single probe EUB338, which targets most bacteria (10), bound specifically to DNA containing an appropriate target at a hybridization temperature of 55°C, which was used for quantitative work. Attempts to quantify bacterial 16S rRNA genes using the EUB338 suite of three probes (10) that target a wider range of bacteria proved to be problematic (data not shown). The three probes target the same region of the gene (10) (Table 1), and we suspect that imperfectly matching probes bound in the initial hybridization and were subsequently lost in the wash steps, reducing signal intensity relative to the intensity using EUB338 alone.
Abundance of verrucomicrobia in soil.
The abundance of members of the different classes (subdivisions) of the phylum Verrucomicrobia in the Ellinbank soil was assessed by analyzing libraries of PCR-amplified and cloned 16S rRNA genes prepared by using a primer pair that amplifies these genes from members of the phylum Verrucomicrobia (38). Members of the class "Spartobacteria" were the dominant verrucomicrobia (Table 3), as judged by the relative abundance of genes in these libraries. Members of the class Verrucomicrobiae (subdivision 1) and of subdivisions 3 and 4 and of a new lineage within the phylum Verrucomicrobia were all rarer (Table 3). The sequence that represented the new lineage, EVS233 (GenBank accession DQ088008) did not group with any of the recognized subdivisions (20, 36) of the phylum in phylogenetic analyses of the 16S rRNA gene sequences (not shown). Some 16S rRNA genes from members of the phylum Planctomycetes were also amplified, but it is not known whether this is because they are more abundant in absolute or in relative terms in the upper sections of the soil. The primer pair used therefore did not exclusively amplify verrucomicrobial DNA but did indicate that members of the class "Spartobacteria" were the most numerous verrucomicrobia.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Cloned 16S rRNA genes amplified from soil DNA by using the VMB537f-VMB1295r primer pair targeting verrucomicrobia
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Distribution of bacteria in the Ellinbank soil. Each point represents the results for a pooled 2-cm section (0 to 2, 2 to 4, 4 to 6, 6 to 8, and 8 to 10 cm). (A) The total cell count ( ), determined by microscopy, decreased with depth, whereas soil moisture ( ) was relatively constant. (B) The oligonucleotide probe VER1112 that targets 16S rRNA gene sequences of members of the class "Spartobacteria" () indicated that 16S rRNA genes from members of this class were more numerous than homologs from subdivision 3 ( ) in PCR products generated by using a bacterium-specific primer pair. The errors bars represent SDs when they are larger than the symbol.
|
Screening of isolates.
A total of 1,208 isolates yielded PCR products that bound probes in the EUB338 suite (Table 4), indicating the presence of 16S rRNA genes of members of the domain Bacteria. These isolates were then screened in a separate hybridization experiment for the ability to bind the probe VER47, complementary to a region of the 16S rRNA gene of most members of the phylum Verrucomicrobia (4). Of the 1,208 products 19 bound the VER47 probe, and the 16S rRNA genes amplified from these cultures were sequenced. The PCR product from one of these appeared to have resulted from a mixed culture, based on the multiple base identifications in the sequencing chromatographs. This culture was not able to be subcultured further and was not analyzed in any more detail. Between 1,327 and 1,480 nucleotides of the sequences of the 16S rRNA genes of the remaining 18 cultures were determined (Table 5).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Screening of isolates to identify members of the phylum Verrucomicrobia
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Identity of VER47-positive isolates and their phylogenetic affiliations as determined by BLAST analysis in GenBank databases (1)a
|
Characteristics of new isolates.
Nine of the new isolates clearly grouped within the newly proposed class "Spartobacteria" (36), equivalent to subdivision 2 (20), of the phylum Verrucomicrobia (Fig. 2). They clustered into two lineages that were supported by bootstrap values of >97%. One group, consisting of six of the isolates, grouped with the cultured species "Chthoniobacter flavus" (36), and had 16S rRNA gene sequences that were 96.9 to 99.9% identical to that of "C. flavus." Three other isolates were more distantly related to "C. flavus" and had 16S rRNA genes that were only 89.9 to 93.2% identical to that of "C. flavus" and 88.5 to 93.2% identical to those of the other six isolates. The 16S rRNA gene sequences of "C. flavus" and the six related isolates were 96.4 to 99.9% identical to each other, while the other three isolates had gene sequences that were 91.2 to 99.4% identical to each other. Sequence identities of <96% have been used to define the genus level separation of bacteria (13). On this basis, the degree of sequence identity between the different isolates of "Spartobacteria" obtained in the present study suggests that they belong to least two genera, one of which is "Chthoniobacter." The other is probably a new genus.
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Evolutionary-distance dendrogram showing the relationships of newly isolated bacteria (in boldface) and other members of the class "Spartobacteria" and of subdivision 3 within the phylum Verrucomicrobia, based on comparisons of their 16S rRNA gene sequences. Also shown are two cultured members of the class Verrucomicrobiae. The dendrogram was constructed by using the Fitch-Margoliash (17) method from Jukes-Cantor (24) distances. The sequences of the 16S rRNA genes of Opitutus terrae (GenBank accession no. AJ229235) and Victivallis vadensis (GenBank accession AY049713) were used as outgroups and to root the tree; they are not shown in the figure. The GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequences are given after each bacterium or clone name. Analyses using different algorithms resulted in very similar dendrograms. The number of times each branch point was recovered in dendrograms constructed from 1,000 bootstrapped datasets is indicated by symbols: , recovered in >90%; , recovered in 75 to 89%. Nodes with no symbol were recovered in <75% of the bootstrapped datasets. The scale bar indicates 0.05 changes per nucleotide position.
|
![]() View larger version (88K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Phase contrast photomicrographs, showing cells of isolate Ellin502, a member of the class "Spartobacteria" (A), and isolate Ellin514, a member of subdivision 3 (B). The scale bar represents 5 µm for both panels.
|
Evaluation of approach.
All but two of the verrucomicrobial isolates initially formed colonies that first became visible more than 1 month after inoculation of the plates with diluted soil. Extended incubation time has been shown to be a significant factor in the isolation of members of many rarely isolated but abundant groups of soil bacteria (11), and this also seems to be true for members of "Spartobacteria" and subdivision 3 of Verrucomicrobia.
All of the isolates affiliated with the class "Spartobacteria" originated from plates inoculated with the equivalent of 2 x 107 g of dry soil, which yielded a mean of 4.8 colonies per plate (SD = 2.5). Only 12% of the colonies screened originated from such plates. No members of the class "Spartobacteria" were found among the 88% of colonies that were found on plates that received a 10-fold-denser inoculum. In contrast, all of the isolates belonging to subdivision 3 originated from plates inoculated with the equivalent of 2 x 106 g of dry soil, which yielded a mean of 28.8 colonies per plate (SD = 5.6), and none were detected among the colonies that were formed on plates with a less-dense inoculum. Members of subdivision 3 of Verrucomicrobia were estimated to be rarer in the soil under investigation, making up <1% of the bacterial community. It is likely that this is why they were only detected on plates with more concentrated inocula. Members of "Spartobacteria" were more common in this soil, making up ca. 4 to 9% of the bacterial community. This is why they appeared on plates with more dilute inocula. They were only detectable on plates with lower total colony numbers (<12 per plate), and may be inhibited by other bacteria on plates with denser inocula.
This study was supported by a grant from the Australian Research Council.
Present address: Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»