Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2005, p. 8618-8626, Vol. 71, No. 12
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.71.12.8618-8626.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Institut für Molekulare Mikrobiologie und Biotechnologie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Corrensstraße 3, D-48149 Münster, Germany
Received 24 May 2005/ Accepted 4 August 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pseudomonas putida 86 has the ability to grow on quinoline as a sole source of carbon and energy. Quinoline 2-oxidoreductase (Qor), which in the first step of the catabolic pathway catalyzes the hydroxylation at position 2 of the quinoline ring, belongs to the xanthine oxidase family of molybdenum enzymes; it contains the molybdopterin cytosine dinucleotide form of the molybdenum pyranopterin cofactor (MCD), two [2Fe2S] clusters, and FAD (2, 37). The crystal structure of Qor, as well as that of the oxygenase component of the second enzyme, 2(1H)-quinolinone 8-monooxygenase (OxoOR), was solved recently (2, 31).
A gene cluster of P. putida 86 (EMBL/GenBank accession number AJ583091) contains, besides genes coding for the first two enzymes of the degradation pathway (qorMSL, oxoO, and oxoR), open reading frames 1 and 2 (ORF1 and -2), presumed to code for an
/ß-hydrolase fold protein and an amidase, and genes coding for accessory proteins presumed to be involved in the maturation of Qor (Fig. 1A). By analogy to XdhC from Rhodobacter capsulatus, the protein encoded by ORF3 might be a chaperone facilitating the insertion of the MCD cofactor into the apoprotein, or it might be involved indirectly in sulfuration of the cofactor, or both (27, 28). The deduced ORF4 protein contains an N-terminal region which resembles MoeC from Clostridium perfringens and contains a predicted molybdopterin binding domain and a C-terminal region similar to that of MobA, which catalyzes molybdopterin guanine dinucleotide formation from Mo-molybdopterin and GTP (46). ORF4 thus may code for a bifunctional molybdopterin-binding protein/nucleotidyltransferase, which forms the cytosine dinucleotide form of the molybdenum cofactor. Apart from a possible role in the maturation of Qor, the IscS- and IscU-like proteins encoded by ORF5 and -6 may additionally or alternatively be involved in the assembly of other iron-sulfur proteins, e.g., OxoOR. Putative ORF7, -8, and -9, located downstream of qorMSL, code for homologues of CoxG, CoxD, and CoxE, respectively; their gene products have been hypothesized to also take part in the maturation of the molybdenum enzyme Qor (3). Expression of all these genes was shown to be induced in the presence of quinoline and to require oxoS, which codes for an AraC/XylS-type transcriptional regulator (EMBL/GenBank accession number AJ617683). In contrast to ORF1 to -6, qorMSL, and the oxoO and oxoR genes, weak transcription of ORF7 to -9 was also observed in the absence of quinoline and independently of oxoS (3).
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. The qor region of Pseudomonas putida 86, presumed promoters, and transcriptional start sites. (A) Genetic map of the qor region. The gene oxoS, marked black, codes for a putative XylS-type transcriptional regulator; qorMSL codes for the subunits of Qor; oxoO and oxoR encode the oxygenase and reductase component, respectively, of OxoOR. For a description of ORF3 to -9, see the introduction. Potential quinoline-dependent promoters of oxoO, ORF3, qorM, and oxoR are designated PoxoO, Porf3, PqorM, and PoxoR, respectively; promoters of oxoS and ORF7 which are not influenced by quinoline are marked PoxoS and Porf7. (B) Nucleotide sequence of the oxoS promoter region. The transcriptional initiation site is shown in boldface, and putative 10 and 35 elements of the 70 recognition site are underlined. (C) Nucleotide sequences of the regions of the quinoline-dependent promoters of oxoO, ORF3, qorM, and oxoR. Putative binding sites for an XylS-like transcriptional activator as deduced from sequence similarity to the XylS binding sites (17) are boxed and designated I and II. Another apparently conserved motif is shown in boldface italics. Transcriptional start sites (3) are shown in boldface type, and putative 10 elements of 38 recognition sites are indicated. (D) Nucleotide sequence of the promoter region of ORF7. Putative transcriptional initiation sites as suggested by primer extension analysis are shown in boldface. For the start site that is proximal to ORF7, a putative extended 10 element (22, 33) of a 70 recognition site is indicated by its consensus sequence above Porf7. Sequences similar to the osmotic shock 38 recognition site (26) and to another possible 70 recognition site are marked by their consensus sequences below the Porf7 sequence.
|
-helix-turn-
-helix DNA binding motif and shows 34% identity and 48% similarity to the corresponding region of XylS (aa 214 to 315). The N-terminal part of OxoS (aa 1 to 142), which may carry effector-binding and regulatory functions, is shorter than that of XylS (aa 1 to 213), and the sequences share only 19% identity and 30% similarity. XylS in the presence of (alkyl)benzoate acts as transcriptional activator of the meta-cleavage operon of the TOL plasmid pWW0 (14). The target site for XylS binding has been described as two imperfect 5'-TGCA-N6-GGNTA-3' direct repeats, separated by 6 bp and located between 70 and 35 in the Pm promoter (17). Upstream of qorM of P. putida 86, a DNA region that resembles the consensus sequence of this XylS tandem motif was identified; however, the two half-sites are separated by only 5 instead of 6 bp (3). Remarkably, conserved 5'-TGCPu-N6-GGATA-3' single motifs are located upstream of oxoO, ORF3, and oxoR (Fig. 1C). The positions of these single motifs roughly correspond to the position of the distal half-site of the XylS tandem motif.
In this work, the requirement for oxoS in quinoline-dependent transcription of PoxoO, Porf3, PqorM, and PoxoR was verified, and additional quinoline-independent promoters were detected for oxoS and ORF7. The activities of all promoters of the gene cluster were determined, and the TGCPu-N6-GGATA-like motif of PoxoO and the corresponding distal motif of the PqorM promoter were shown to be essential for quinoline-dependent transcriptional activation by OxoS. Additionally, we compared the specificities of OxoS and XylS as regulators of PoxoO, PqorM, and Pm and determined whether these regulators in the presence of their specific effectors are able to cross-activate each other's promoters.
|
|
|---|
(50) and E. coli S17-1 (45) were grown at 37°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (41). When necessary, ampicillin (100 µg/ml for E. coli strains, 500 µg/ml for P. putida strains), chloramphenicol (50 µg/ml), kanamycin (50 µg/ml), or gentamicin (10 µg/ml) was added to the cultures.
DNA techniques.
Genomic DNA of P. putida 86 was isolated according to the method of Davis et al. (8). Plasmid DNA was prepared with the E.Z.N.A. Plasmid Mini Kit I (peqLab, Erlangen, Germany). Gel extraction of DNA fragments was performed with the Perfectprep Gel cleanup kit from Eppendorf (Hamburg, Germany). Digestion with restriction endonucleases, ligation, and agarose gel electrophoresis were carried out using standard protocols (41). The sequences of the constructed hybrid plasmids were confirmed by DNA sequencing (MWG-Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany); in-house sequencing according to the didesoxy chain termination method was performed using a Li-Cor model 4000L sequencer. Competent cells of E. coli were prepared and transformed using the CaCl2 procedure as described by Hanahan (18). Conjugations of E. coli S17-1 (donor) harboring hybrid plasmids and P. putida 86 (44) or P. putida 86-1 (13) were performed by filter mating as described previously (13).
Construction of plasmids.
All primers used for PCR are listed in Table S2 in the supplemental material. To study the activity of PoxoO, a 400-bp PCR fragment that includes 144 bp of oxoS, the intergenic region between oxoS and oxoO, and the first seven triplets of oxoO was cloned into the HindIII/XhoI sites of pPR9TT (42) in frame with the lacZ gene, generating pPR9TT::PoxoO. To generate pPR9TT::Porf3, a 523-bp PCR fragment comprising 303 bp of ORF2, the intergenic region between ORF2 and ORF3, and the first seven triplets of ORF3 was cloned as described for PoxoO. For the construction of pPR9TT::PqorM, a 637-bp PCR fragment that included 399 bp of ORF6, the intergenic region between ORF6 and qorM, and the first eight triplets of qorM was cloned into the PstI/SalI sites of pPR9TT in frame with the lacZ gene. A 587-bp PCR fragment comprising 270 bp of ORF9, the intergenic region between ORF9 and oxoR, and seven triplets of oxoR was cloned as described for PoxoO to generate pPR9TT::PoxoR. To generate pPR9TT::Porf7, a 462-bp PCR fragment comprising 259 bp of the qorL gene, the intergenic region between qorL and ORF7, and the first nine triplets of ORF7 was cloned as described for PoxoO. For the construction of pPR9TT::PoxoS, a 475-bp PCR fragment that included the upstream region of oxoS and the first 11 triplets of oxoS was cloned as described for PoxoO. To study the Pm promoter, a 143-bp PCR fragment that included the XylS binding region (17, 23) and the first five triplets of the xylX gene was amplified using pJB653 (1) as a template. The PCR fragment was cloned as described for PoxoO, generating pPR9TT::Pm.
The PoxoO deletion series (see Fig. 4A) was constructed as follows. PoxoO promoter fragments were amplified by PCR using appropriate 5' primers and the 3' primer PToxoOr1 to construct pPR9TT::PoxoO2 and pPR9TT:PoxoO3. PToxoOr2 was the 3' primer for PCR to construct pPR9TT::PoxoO4 and pPR9TT::PoxoO5. The PCR products were cloned into the HindIII/XhoI sites of pPR9TT in frame with the lacZ gene. PqorM promoter fragments (see Fig. 4B) for the construction of pPR9TT::PqorM2, pPR9TT::PqorM3, and pPR9TT::PqorM4 were amplified by PCR using the 3' primer PTqorMr1 and appropriate 5' primers. For amplification of promoter fragments to generate pPR9TT::PqorM5 and pPR9TT::PqorM6, PTqorMr2 was used as a 3' primer. The products were cloned into the PstI/SalI sites of pPR9TT in frame with the lacZ gene.
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Deletion analysis of the 5' region upstream of the (A) PoxoO promoter and (B) PqorM promoter. The DNA region fused to the lacZ gene is shown at the left of each panel (black bars). The numbers indicate the positions of the 5' termini of the transcriptional fusions relative to the transcription start points (+1) of oxoO and qorM. Filled boxes in the intergenic regions between oxoS and oxoO (A) and ORF6 and qorM (B) indicate "box I" as defined in the legend to Fig. 1C. P. putida 86-1 was transformed by the pPR9TT-based reporter plasmids. Growth of cells and addition of quinoline were performed as described in the legend to Fig. 3. ß-Galactosidase activities of the cells grown on succinate and induced with 1 mM quinoline are shown at the right of each panel. ß-Galactosidase activities were assayed after 5 hours of incubation with quinoline. The error bars indicate standard deviations.
|
Isolation of RNA, primer extension, and reverse transcription (RT)-PCR analysis.
P. putida 86 was grown on quinoline, succinate, or benzoate and harvested in the exponential growth phase (optical density at 600 nm [OD600], about 1.5). Total RNA was isolated using the Nucleo Spin RNAII kit from Macherey-Nagel (Düren, Germany). Residual DNA was removed by digestion with 10 U RNase-free DNase (Promega, Madison, WI) in the presence of RNase inhibitor (20 U; MBI Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania) for 30 min at 37°C; afterward, the RNA was repurified. The primers were 5' end labeled with the fluorescent dye IRD800 (MWG-Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany), and extension reactions were carried out as previously described (3), using 5 µg and 10 µg of RNA as templates for amplification of the transcripts of ORF7 and oxoS, respectively. The samples were analyzed on a polyacrylamide gel (SequaGel XR; National Diagnostics, Atlanta, GA) on a Li-Cor DNA sequencer (model 4000L). A sample of a sequencing reaction that used the same labeled primer and the CycleReader Auto Sequencing Kit (MBI Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania) was run alongside to determine the size of the primer extension product.
RT-PCR analyses were carried out as previously described (3) with 2 or 5 µg RNA as a template. cDNA products were amplified by PCR using 1 U Taq DNA polymerase (Promega), 20 pmol of the respective forward and reverse primers, and 1 µl of the product of the RT reaction as templates.
ß-Galactosidase assays.
For all P. putida or E. coli clones, 1 ml of each cell suspension was harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 800 µl of Z buffer (60 mM Na2HPO4, 40 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4, 50 mM 2-mercaptoethanol). The cells were permeabilized using one drop each of chloroform and 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate. ß-Galactosidase activity was measured as described by Miller (32) and was expressed in Miller units (MU). Three to five independently grown cultures were assayed in triplicate, and the values were averaged.
Enzyme assays.
Cells were suspended in 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.5, and disrupted by sonication at 4°C. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation. The activity of Qor was determined spectrophotometrically by measuring the substrate-dependent reduction of the artificial electron acceptor iodonitrotetrazolium chloride as described previously (48). One unit of Qor activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that reduces 1 µmol iodonitrotetrazolium chloride per minute at 25°C. Protein concentrations were estimated by the method of Bradford as modified by Zor and Selinger (52), using bovine serum albumin as a standard protein.
|
|
|---|
70-dependent promoter (Fig. 1B); however, homologies to recognition sites of other
factors were not found in the region upstream of the transcriptional start site of oxoS. To determine the activity of the postulated promoter of oxoS, transcriptional fusion analysis was performed using P. putida 86-1(pPR9TT::PoxoS). The ß-galactosidase activities (1.8 to 1.5 MU) were somewhat higher than those observed for P. putida 86-1(pPR9TT) (1 MU) and were not influenced by the presence of quinoline in the growth medium. The poor conservation of the 10 and 35 elements, especially the 10 hexamer (Fig. 1B), may account for the failure to detect significant promoter activity, since a general rule holds that the greater the similarity of these regions to their consensus sequence, the better the promoter functions (9). Taken together, the results tentatively suggest that oxoS is transcribed from a very weak
70-dependent promoter and that transcription might be constitutive, analogous to the expression at a low level of xylS from the Ps2 promoter (15).
![]() View larger version (62K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. RT-PCR analysis of oxoS and qorMSL. As a template, total RNA from P. putida 86 grown on benzoate (lanes 2 and 3), quinoline (lanes 4 and 5), or succinate (lanes 6 and 7) was used. In lanes 1, PCR was performed with DNA as a template (positive control). RNA (5 µg and 2 µg) was used in the RT reaction for analysis of the transcripts of oxoS and qorMSL, respectively. Lanes 3, 5, and 7 are negative controls, where reverse transcriptase was omitted in the RT reaction. Lane M, size marker (1.031, 0.9, 0.8, 0.7, 0.6, 0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, and 0.1 kb).
|
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. ß-Galactosidase activities and growth of P. putida 86-1 containing (A) pPR9TT::PoxoO, (B) pPR9TT::Porf3, (C) pPR9TT::PqorM, or (D) pPR9TT::PoxoR. Cells were grown in mineral salts medium with (NH4)2SO4 and succinate. At an OD600 of 0.2, the cultures were split and quinoline (1 mM) was added to one sample of each set. ß-Galactosidase activities were assayed as described in Materials and Methods for cells grown on succinate (white bars) or succinate plus 1 mM quinoline (hatched bars). Growth on succinate ( ), or on succinate plus 1 mM quinoline ( ) is shown as OD600. The error bars indicate standard deviations.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. ß-Galactosidase activities expressed from promoter-lacZ fusions in the OxoS mutant of P. putida 86-1a
|
Transcriptional activation of PqorM, but not PoxoO, by XylS and benzoate and activity of Qor in P. putida 86-1 OxoS complemented with oxoS or xylS.
To determine whether the similarity of the proposed cis-acting sequences of quinoline-dependent promoters and Pm is sufficient to effect cross-activation by XylS, the activities of PqorM and PoxoO in response to XylS and benzoate were monitored using lacZ reporter systems. Complementation of the OxoS mutant of P. putida 86-1 with oxoS expressed from its own promoter on pBBR1MCS-4::oxoSa restored quinoline-dependent transcriptional activation of PoxoO (Table 2). However, transcription of PoxoO in the absence of quinoline was about 19% of quinoline-induced transcription, again suggesting that OxoS, even in the absence of effector, acts as a weak transcriptional activator. The gene product of archetypal xylS, expressed on pBBR1MCS-4::xylSa from its own promoter(s), is not able to mediate noticeable effector-dependent transcriptional activation of PoxoO (Table 2). This observation suggests that despite conservation of the distal TGCA-N6-GGNTA sequence ("box I" in Fig. 1C), absence of the proximal sequence of the archetypal XylS target site in PoxoO prevents productive binding of effector-activated XylS. However, note that the ß-galactosidase activities in benzoate- and quinoline-treated cells, as well as in cells grown on succinate, were higher than the observed activity of about 4 MU in P. putida 86-1 OxoS(pPR9TT::PoxoO) (Table 1). As this effector-independent increase in reporter gene expression is correlated with the presence of pBBR1MCS-4::xylSa, we may hypothesize that XylS protein weakly stimulates transcription from PoxoO.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. ß-Galactosidase activities expressed from promoter-lacZ fusions in the OxoS mutant of P. putida 86-1 complemented with oxoS or xylSa
|
It is remarkable that in the absence of the XylS effector benzoate, the PqorM promoter appears to be less responsive to XylS than the PoxoO promoter. Construction and analysis of a series of PqorM mutant promoters would be required to analyze whether this is due to the imperfect conservation of the distal submotif (TGCG instead of the TGCA of the XylS binding site) or other features of the promoter sequence, such as the distance of the presumed 10 element from the transcriptional start site, or both.
Consistent with the results from analysis of transcriptional activation, the specific activity of Qor observed in crude extracts of the OxoS mutant of P. putida 86-1 was very low and independent of the presence of quinoline (Table 3). Complementation with oxoS, expressed from its own promoter on pBBR1MCS4, restored the inducibility of enzyme synthesis by quinoline; however, Qor activity was lower than in extracts of wild-type cells. Complementation of the oxoS knockout mutant with xylS, likewise transcribed from its own promoter(s), led to significant Qor activity in benzoate-grown cells (Table 3). Thus, as a physiological consequence of the replacement of oxoS by xylS, quinoline conversion became responsive to benzoate instead of quinoline.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Activities of Qor in crude extracts of wild-type P. putida 86, the P. putida 86-1 OxoS mutant, and P. putida 86-1 OxoS complemented with oxoS or xylSa
|
(pPR9TT::Pm) grown in LB showed considerable ß-galactosidase activities, independently of the presence of benzoate or quinoline (Table 4). Additional presence of xylS (on pBBR1MCS-4::xylSb) increased the activity; however, activation of XylS by benzoate clearly resulted in further transcriptional activation (Table 4). Cross-activation of Pm by the oxoS gene product was monitored in E. coli DH5
(pPR9TT::Pm, pBBR1MCS-4::oxoSb). Transcription from Pm indeed was somewhat stimulated by quinoline (Table 4), indicating that effector-activated OxoS weakly complements the active form of XylS. Taken together, our data tentatively suggest that the effects of ligand binding on the properties of the regulators, and the mechanisms of transcriptional activation from the cognate promoters, are similar for OxoS and XylS. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. ß-Galactosidase activities expressed from Pm-lacZ fusion in E. coli DH5 in the presence of xylS or oxoSa
|
70 recognition site was identified upstream of the start site proximal to ORF7; the sequence of the 35 region, however, is quite different from the 35 consensus sequence. Since an extended 10 element characterized by T and G at positions 15 and 14, respectively, was reported to significantly contribute to promoter strength (22, 33), the sequence TGT preceding the presumed 10 hexamer of the minor transcriptional start site might compensate for its nonconsensus 35 region (Fig. 1D). Remarkably, a sequence that is more similar to the "osmotic shock consensus sequence" GCGG-(15 to 16 bp)-CTAcacTt of the
38 recognition site (26) than to the 10 and 35 elements of the
70 binding site is located upstream of the putative major transcriptional initiation site (Fig. 1D). However, the distance of these elements from the presumed distal transcriptional start site is much larger than in known
38-dependent promoters (26). Promoter activities of a Porf7-lacZ fusion in P. putida 86-1(pPR9TT::Porf7) were low (ß-galactosidase activities of 9 to 13.5 MU) and independent of the presence of quinoline. Such quinoline-independent transcription from Porf7 might be a remnant of evolution if these genes were recruited from another background into this gene cluster, or it might be a necessity if the gene products are additionally involved in reactions other than quinoline catabolism.
|
|
|---|
While polycistronic transcripts originating from PoxoO, or from the internal Porf3 or PqorM promoter, account for quinoline-dependent expression of ORF7 to -9, additional quinoline-independent promoters were detected upstream of ORF7. The proteins encoded by ORF7 to -9 have been hypothesized to be involved in the assembly or maturation of molybdenum hydroxylases (3). As P. putida 86 contains at least one other molybdenum enzyme, namely, xanthine dehydrogenase (35), a low level of expression of ORF7 to -9 independent of quinoline might be essential for housekeeping functions. Alternatively, quinoline-independent transcription from Porf7 might simply result from recruitment of ORF7 to -9 and their upstream sequence from another genetic background into this gene cluster.
To examine the specificity, or lack of it, for the interactions of the XylS-type regulators with their cognate promoters, we have compared the activities of XylS and OxoS as regulators of PoxoO/PqorM and Pm, respectively. In P. putida 86-1 OxoS, the xylS gene product in the presence of its effector benzoate weakly stimulated the PqorM promoter, but not PoxoO, possibly due to closer similarity of PqorM to Pm, especially in the "box II" sequence in Fig. 1C. Very weak cross-activation of Pm by OxoS was observed in the presence of quinoline. Cross-activation has been studied intensely for XylR-type regulators and their
54-dependent promoters, which actually can be activated to various degrees by heterologous proteins. Cross-binding of DmpR of the phenol catabolic operon and XylR of the upper TOL (toluene) operon to each other's upstream activating sequences, or activation by XylR and HbpR of the promoters of 2-hydroxybiphenyl and the toluene operon, have been reported (11, 47). The promoters of gene clusters coding for two different toluene monooxygenases are both activated by the NtrC family regulators TbmR and TbuT (25). Cross-activation of two different pathways for toluene degradation can be mediated by the two-component signal transduction systems TmoS-TmoT and TodS-TodT in the presence of toluene (39). These examples illustrate that many upstream activating sequences within catabolic promoters are not strictly specific for their regulator, and many regulators show some promiscuity with respect to operator binding specificity. Such cross-binding of "low-specificity regulators" to "leaky" operator sequences has been proposed to play an important role in the evolution of new catabolic pathways, as it allows primitive regulation of genes acquired by horizontal gene transfer by preexisting regulators (4, 10).
The assembly and evolution of catabolic pathways is assumed to mainly result from a series of gene duplication events, followed by specialization. By concomitant duplication of the cis-acting elements, a duplicated gene should inherit the regulation from the original gene, and the existing promoter would evolve by adapting to another signal responsiveness (4). Regarding this hypothesis, the presence of a recognition site for an XylS-type transcriptional regulator upstream of the qorMSL genes is remarkable, as these transcriptional activators have not been previously described as being involved in transcriptional control of genes encoding molybdenum hydroxylases. In contrast, several other homologues of OxoS besides XylS are positive regulators of catabolic pathways that open up access to xenobiotic or aromatic carbon sources. Examples involve the ThcR protein presumed to be involved in regulation of S-ethyldipropylcarbamothioate (the herbicide EPTC) degradation by Rhodococcus erythropolis NI86/21 (34); the transcriptional regulator AntR of carbazole and anthranilate degradation by P. resinovorans CA10 (49); the EthR regulator of Rhodococcus ruber IFP2001, probably involved in ethyl tert-butyl ether degradation (6); AndR from Burkholderia cepacia DBO1, controlling expression of a three-component anthranilate 1,2-dioxygenase (5); IpbR, which might be involved in isopropylbenzene degradation by Pseudomonas sp. strain JR1 (TrEMBL accession number Q9KK00); and the BenR regulator of benzoate degradation by P. putida PRS2000 (7). Involvement of an XylS-type regulator in quinoline degradation might actually reflect the evolutionary origin of this pathway in the metabolism of aromatic carbon compounds. Aerobic bacterial degradation of aromatic compounds is typically initiated by hydroxylation reactions catalyzed by multicomponent oxygenases. Note that 2(1H)-quinolinone, the substrate of OxoOR, which is a member of the multicomponent aromatic-ring non-heme-iron oxygenases (40), also is an effector of OxoS (3). We may tentatively speculate that genes for the synthesis and maturation of the molybdenum enzyme Qor were assembled into an ancestral catabolic gene cluster (characterized by oxoS, oxoO, and oxoR) coding for the OxoS-controlled degradation of an aromatic compound. If indeed such patchwork assembly of a "molybdenum hydroxylase gene cluster" into an "aromatic-compound degradation gene cluster" occurred, the additional internal promoters Porf3 and PqorM might have evolved due to the necessity to ensure efficient substrate-controlled transcription of the large DNA region.
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FE 383/6-1) and a grant from the Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster to B.C.
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
qor pUF1 and analysis of the Qor proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 270:1567-1577.[Medline]
70-dependent promoter or from
70- and
54-dependent tandem promoter according to the compound used for growth. J. Bacteriol. 178:2356-2361.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»