Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2005, p. 8978-8981, Vol. 71, No. 12
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.71.12.8978-8981.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
| SHORT REPORT |
Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, Hospital Jeroen Bosch, Nieuwstraat 34, 5211 NL 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands,1 PamGene International B.V., Nieuwstraat 30, 5211 NL 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands,2 Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Hesselink van Suchtelenweg 4, NL-6703 CT Wageningen, The Netherlands3
Received 15 July 2005/ Accepted 14 September 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anopore strips (8 by 36 mm; 60 µm thick; 0.2-µm-diameter pores; 3 x 109 pores cm2) were a gift from PamGene International ('s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands). A latex solution (masking fluid 052; Royal Talens, The Netherlands) was applied to one surface in 1-mm-thick lines using a mapping pen and allowed to polymerize at room temperature for 20 min. The strips were then washed with distilled water and twice with 96% (vol/vol) ethanol and air dried. The grid formed a surface barrier 0.5 mm wide and 0.4 mm high that delineated eight culture areas of 7 by 4 mm. The polymerized latex was not strongly autofluorescent: illumination in the 515- to 730-nm range required exposures of >5 seconds to saturate the charge-coupled device camera. Anopore strips were placed on an appropriate nutrient agar base (5), inoculated on the upper surface at a density of 100 to 2,000 CFU/mm2, and then incubated. Microcolonies were stained by transfer of these strips right-side up to a microscope slide covered with a 1-mm-thick film of 1% (wt/vol) solidified low-melting-point agarose (Sigma, The Netherlands) containing 10 µM Syto-9 dye plus 40 µM propidium iodide (PI) or 5 µM hexidium iodide (HI) for bacteria and 20 µM Fun-1 for yeasts (7) (all dyes were from Invitrogen, The Netherlands). Staining was for 20 min at room temperature for bacteria and 30°C for yeasts. These procedures allowed staining of the organisms on the Anopore surface through the pores without disruption of the microcolonies. Strips were then imaged directly (without coverslip, immersion oil, or fixative) using an Olympus BX-41 fluorescence microscope equipped with U-MWIBA filters (excitation spectrum of 460 to 490 nm, dichroic mirror splitting at 505 nm, and an emission spectrum of 515 to 550 nm, used for Syto9 and Fun-1 dyes), U-M41007 (530 to 560 nm excitation, 565 nm splitting, and 575 to 645 nm emission, used for PI and HI dyes), and U-M41008 (590 to 650 nm emission, 660 nm splitting, and 665 to 735 nm excitation) (Olympus, Japan). Scanning and examination of microcolonies were performed with 4x and 10x UMPlanF1 objective lenses, and observation of individual cells used a 50x UMPlanF1 objective (Olympus, Japan). Growth of a wide range of microorganisms was possible (Table 1), and all organisms tested grew. Growth was detected after one to two rounds of division by the formation of microcolonies (Fig. 1A and B). Formation of visible colonies on Anopore generally occurred in a similar time frame as directly on the same nutrient agar; for example, colonies of Escherichia coli 2613 were visible with an overnight incubation on Anopore on a variety of media (Table 1). The culturability of mid-log- and stationary-phase cultures of Escherichia coli 2613 and Staphylococcus aureus 1101711 was similar on Anopore placed on Mueller-Hinton or blood agar as on these media directly (assessed by viable count). Cell morphology and development were as expected; for example, Candida albicans formed germ tubes within 1.5 to 2.5 h after inoculation of the yeast form on Anopore on blood agar (Fig. 1D). Syto-9/PI staining (7) of the distribution of cells within compartments suggested that the latex barrier was neither toxic nor bacteriostatic for E. coli 2613, Enterobacter aerogenes 1499, or S. aureus 1101711.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial and yeast strains cultured on Anopore
|
![]() View larger version (73K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Examples of microorganisms grown and imaged on Anopore placed on agar plates. (A) Escherichia coli 2613 stained by Syto-9 and imaged by fluorescence microscopy. (B) Shigella sonnei 2627-1 imaged by scanning electron microscopy, showing the Anopore structure. (C) Candida tropicalis stained with Fun-1 dye. (D) Scanning electron microscopy of Candida albicans showing germ tube outgrowth on Anopore. Bars, 5 µm.
|
![]() View larger version (8K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Growth curve of E. coli 2613 after inoculation on Anopore and incubation on Mueller-Hinton ( ) or sheep's blood agar ( ); each time point sample was then stained with Syto-9 and imaged. A total of 160 microcolonies were analyzed per data point; error bars indicate standard deviations from the mean values.
|
To create a format capable of more highly multiplexed analysis, the number of compartments on an 8- by 36-mm strip of Anopore was increased to 336 (an 8-by-42 array). Printing of this fine grid was done using an automated syringe (I&J Fisnar) with a 100-µm-diameter needle moving at 18 mm/second. Gridlines were printed at a pitch of 0.7 mm with the latex dispensed under 1 bar of pressure. The rigidity of Anopore and flatness permitted precise and reproducible printing, with the needle operating 5 to 10 µm above the surface. The rate of latex polymerization was slowed by the addition of 10% (vol/vol) ethylene glycol (Sigma, The Netherlands) to facilitate dispensing. After delivery and partial polymerization of the latex, the chips were heated to 60°C (10 min) or washed in 96% ethanol to complete curing. The rigidity and limited expansion or contraction of Anopore (4, 6) allowed wetting and heating treatments to be made without distorting the grid. The result was a highly uniform barrier on the upper surface of the Anopore. The latex grid penetrated the pores of the Anopore where printed, anchoring it in place. The compartments were 0.3 by 0.4 mm, and the barrier was 0.3 mm wide and high (Fig. 3A). Attempts to reproduce this grid pattern on nylon and polycarbonate membranes failed. This was partly due to difficulties in maintaining these flexible membranes sufficiently flat during printing and processing (especially with wetting and temperature changes) and also due to poor anchoring of the grid. Inoculation of bacteria (<20 CFU) into a compartment with a needle and subsequent growth was demonstrated (Fig. 3B). Even after 48 h of growth there was no spread from the target compartment into adjacent compartments, indicating effective segregation. Spread-plating each of three chips with E. coli 2613 (10 µl, 104 CFU/ml) using a small sterile glass spreader resulted in growth in all compartments. Spread-plating each of 10 336-well chips with an average of 30.2 CFU of E. coli resulted in growth in 14.1 ± 3.4 compartments per chip (47% culturability). In order to test segregation and detection of different species, 10 chips (3,360 compartments) were spread-plated with a mixture of E. coli 2613 (1.1 CFU/compartment) and S. aureus 110117 (0.09 CFU/compartment). After incubation for 4 h on Muller-Hinton agar and staining with HI and Syto-9 (7), growth occurred in 38% of compartments (n = 1,277). Compartments containing bacteria that preferentially stained with HI (indicating they were likely to be gram positive) were detected in 3.0% of compartments (n = 99). Confirmation that S. aureus was being detected was done by imaging cell morphology; 56 compartments contained a mixed population, 42 contained S. aureus alone, and 1 was a false positive (no cocci).
![]() View larger version (119K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Detail of 336-compartment Anopore chips. (A) Transmission light microscopy image of uninoculated chip. c, Anopore compartment; g, grid barrier. Bar, 0.8 mm. (B) Fluorescence microscopy image of E. coli 2613 inoculated and cultured in four compartments and subsequently stained with Syto-9.
|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»