This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hope, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hope, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hope, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2005, p. 1114-1116, Vol. 71, No. 2
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.71.2.1114-1116.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

SHORT REPORT

Efficacy of Removal of Sucrose-Supplemented Interproximal Plaque by Electric Toothbrushes in an In Vitro Model

C. K. Hope,1 A. Petrie,2 and M. Wilson1*

Division of Microbial Diseases,1 Biostatistics Unit, Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom2

Received 12 January 2004/ Accepted 7 September 2004

ABSTRACT

Electric toothbrushes were evaluated using a model of plaque removal by fluid shear forces. Sucrose supplementation during plaque development did not affect the removal of bacteria from biofilm exposed to low-energy shear but did increase their resistance to high-energy shear. The toothbrush supplying high-energy shear forces removed significantly more viable bacteria.

Dental plaque is a microbial biofilm that develops on nonshedding oral surfaces (24), and its composition and structure are strongly influenced by the amount of fermentable carbohydrates available (2, 3, 14, 17). The breakdown of these carbohydrates to acids by the oral microbiota (16) is a major factor in the etiology of dental caries. Constant-depth film fermentors (CDFFs) (23) can produce oral biofilms in vitro which closely model those found in vivo. This is true in terms of both the composition of the microbial population (10, 19, 20) and the plaque architecture (13). Using an established system which models the action of electric toothbrushes upon CDFF-grown biofilms (5, 6), we previously showed that a Sonicare Plus toothbrush (SP) removed a significantly (P = 0.017) greater median percentage (51.12%) of viable biofilm bacteria than did a Braun Oral B 3D (D17) toothbrush (BO) (17.49%) (7) when the CDFF was supplied with a mucin-containing artificial saliva (18).

These brushing experiments were repeated under identical conditions by using oral biofilms grown in the presence of sucrose to determine if supplementing dental plaques with excess fermentable carbohydrate during growth affected the efficacy of plaque removal by electric toothbrushes.

The protocol for growing oral biofilms in a CDFF on a hydroxyapatite (HA) substratum and the brushing methodologies have been described previously (7). However, in this study sucrose was added to the CDFF 24 h after inoculation as 330-ml pulses of a 10% (wt/vol) aqueous sucrose (Sigma, Poole, United Kingdom) solution which was pumped into the CDFF three times a day, each pulse lasting 30 min. This level of sucrose supplementation equates to the total mean daily sucrose intake of adults in the United Kingdom (1).

A pair of HA disks containing biofilms were inserted into recesses located in plastic teeth (Fig. 1), which were in turn placed into a typodont model (SM-PVR-660; Columbia Dentoform, Long Island City, N.Y.) itself located in an exposure chamber containing 7 ml of a brushing solution (5). After a brushing time of 5 s, the number of bacteria removed from the biofilms was ascertained by removing an aliquot of brushing solution and determining the number of CFU on blood agar after 48 h of anaerobic incubation at 37°C. The number of bacteria remaining upon the disks after brushing was similarly determined following their removal by vortex mixing with phosphate-buffered saline and glass beads and plating as described above. The percentages of bacteria (in terms of CFU) removed from the biofilm by brushing were calculated by assuming the total number of bacteria initially present upon the HA disks to be the sum of the number of bacteria removed and the number of bacteria remaining.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Spatial arrangement of the teeth, toothbrush, and biofilm-covered HA discs (plan view). The bristles of the toothbrushes were separated from the HA disks by a minimum distance of 2 mm, and the brushing solution did not submerge the disks. The thickness of the biofilm was 200 µm.

A Mann-Whitney U test (a nonparametric comparison of the medians of two independent groups) showed that the median percentage of sucrose-supplemented plaque bacteria removed by the SP (32.00%, n = 7) after 5 s of exposure was significantly (P = 0.003) greater than that removed by the BO (15.31%, n = 5). The interquartile range of the data was calculated from the weighted averages (Table 1). The actual number of bacteria removed and remaining upon the HA disks after brushing is shown in Fig. 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Median percentage of sucrose-supplemented oral biofilm removed from HA disks by two different electric toothbrushes, enumerated as CFU



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Number of bacteria removed or remaining upon HA disks after brushing for 5 s. Error bars show 95% confidence intervals.

In this study, a series of sucrose pulses, followed by rinsing with artificial saliva, was used to model the situation which occurs in vivo during the consumption of sucrose-rich drinks (11, 12), an approach which has been previously used to expose dental plaque to a cariogenic challenge (8, 9). Sucrose availability affects the composition and structure of oral biofilms (17, 19). It has also been shown that different species of bacteria have different responses to shear stress (21). This suggests that, since oral biofilms grown in the presence of sucrose have a different composition from that of biofilms grown in the absence of sucrose, their resistance to shear stress should also be different. Biofilm structure is also dependent upon nutrient availability (17): broadly speaking, excess nutrients tend to yield flat biofilms while nutrient-limited conditions result in finger-like projections attached to the bulk of the biofilm by narrow isthmi.

Oral bacteria store excess carbohydrates as intracellular and extracellular polysaccharide (EPS). Insoluble EPS with branched glucan or fructan chains contributes to the structural integrity of the biofilm matrix by the formation of a network of cross-linked linear macromolecules (22). An increase in the production of EPS will, in turn, increase the physical stability of the plaque as a whole (15).

A comparison between the percentage of bacteria removed from sucrose-supplemented oral biofilms and a similar study using biofilms grown without available sucrose (5) showed an interesting disparity in the percentages of biofilm bacteria removed. There was almost no difference in the median percentage of plaque bacteria removed by the BO in biofilms grown with and without available sucrose: with sucrose, 15.31%; without sucrose, 15.86%. However, supplementation of CDFF-grown plaques with sucrose did appear to affect the percentage of plaque removed by the SP (with sucrose, 32.00%; without sucrose, 48.45%).

The reason why sucrose supplementation of plaque biofilms did not affect the efficacy of the BO toothbrush may be due to the relatively low-level fluid shear that it produced through the interproximal space (i.e., between the teeth), shear which was capable of removing bacteria associated with surface protrusions whether or not sucrose was available to the developing biofilm but was unable to remove the underlying bulk of the plaque. In a model similar to the one used in this study, the mean interproximal fluid flow velocity produced by a BO was 18 cm s–1, while an SP produced a flow velocity of 31 cm s–1 along with entrained air bubbles (4). Bacteria associated with surface protrusions will be preferentially removed from biofilm by these external forces since their attachment to the bulk of the biofilm-substratum is over a smaller area. The SP toothbrush, however, removes both the surface protrusions and deeper layers of the plaque biofilm (7).

Changes in the robustness of oral biofilms in response to dietary carbohydrate in the form of sucrose may be responsible for the observed differences, but further work is needed to ascertain if this is the case.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Funding for this project was provided by Philips Oral Healthcare Inc.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Microbiology Unit, Division of Microbial Diseases, Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, 256 Gray's Inn Rd., London WC1X 8LD, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 (0)207 915 1050. Fax: 44 (0)207 915 1127. E-mail: m.wilson{at}eastman.ucl.ac.uk. Back

REFERENCES

    1
  1. Burt, B. A. 1993. Relative consumption of sucrose and other sugars: has it been a factor in reduced caries experience? Caries Res. 27(Suppl. 1):56-63.
  2. 2
  3. Clarke, J. K. 1924. On the bacterial factor in the aetiology of dental caries. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 5:114-147.
  4. 3
  5. Cury, J. A., A. S. Marques, C. P. Tabchoury, and A. A. Bel Cury. 2003. Composition of dental plaque formed in the presence of sucrose and after its interruption. Braz. Dent. J. 14:147-152.[Medline]
  6. 4
  7. Gottenbos, B., J. Janssen, and C. Van Oijen. 2003. Comparison of the fluid flow through the interproximal space by two powered toothbrushes. J. Dent. Res. 82B:2187.
  8. 5
  9. Hope, C. K., A. Petrie, and M. Wilson. 2003. In vitro assessment of the plaque-removing ability of hydrodynamic shear forces produced beyond the bristles by two electric toothbrushes. J. Periodontol. 74:624-629.
  10. 6
  11. Hope, C. K., and M. Wilson. 2002. Comparison of the interproximal plaque removal efficacy of two powered toothbrushes using in vitro oral biofilms. Am. J. Dent. 15B:7B-11B.
  12. 7
  13. Hope, C. K., and M. Wilson. 2003. Effects of dynamic fluid activity from an electric toothbrush on in vitro oral biofilms. J. Clin. Periodontol. 30:624-629.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. 8
  15. Igarashi, K., I. K. Lee, and C. F. Schachtele. 1989. Comparison of in vivo human dental plaque pH changes within artificial fissures and at interproximal sites. Caries Res. 23:417-422.[Medline]
  16. 9
  17. Igarashi, K., I. K. Lee, and C. F. Schachtele. 1990. Effect of dental plaque age and bacterial composition on the pH of artificial fissures in human volunteers. Caries Res. 24:52-58.[Medline]
  18. 10
  19. Kinniment, S. L., J. W. Wimpenny, D. Adams, and P. D. Marsh. 1996. Development of a steady-state oral microbial biofilm community using the constant-depth film fermenter. Microbiology 142:631-638.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. 11
  21. Lagerlof, F., R. Dawes, and C. Dawes. 1984. Salivary clearance of sugar and its effects on pH changes by Streptococcus mitior in an artificial mouth. J. Dent. Res. 63:1266-1270.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. 12
  23. Lindfors, B., and F. Lagerlof. 1988. Effect of sucrose concentration in saliva after a sucrose rinse on the hydronium ion concentration in dental plaque. Caries Res. 22:7-10.[Medline]
  24. 13
  25. Listgarten, M. A., H. Mayo, and M. Amsterdam. 1973. Ultrastructure of the attachment device between coccal and filamentous microorganisms in "corn cob" formations of dental plaque. Arch. Oral Biol. 18:651-656.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. 14
  27. Marsh, P. D. 1991. Sugar, fluoride, pH and microbial homeostasis in dental plaque. Proc. Finn. Dent. Soc. 87:515-525.[Medline]
  28. 15
  29. Marsh, P. D., and M. V. Martin. 2000. Oral microbiology, p. 34-58. Wright, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  30. 16
  31. Miller, W. D. 1890. The microorganisms of the human mouth. The S. S. White Manufacturing Co., Philadelphia, Pa.
  32. 17
  33. Pratten, J., C. S. Andrews, D. Q. Craig, and M. Wilson. 2000. Structural studies of microcosm dental plaques grown under different nutritional conditions. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 189:215-218.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. 18
  35. Pratten, J., K. Wills, P. Barnett, and M. Wilson. 1998. In vitro studies of the effect of antiseptic-containing mouthwashes on the formation and viability of Streptococcus sanguis biofilms. J. Appl. Microbiol. 84:1149-1155.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. 19
  37. Pratten, J., and M. Wilson. 1999. Antimicrobial susceptibility and composition of microcosm dental plaques supplemented with sucrose. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1595-1599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. 20
  39. Roberts, A. P., G. Cheah, D. Ready, J. Pratten, M. Wilson, and P. Mullany. 2001. Transfer of Tn916-like elements in microcosm dental plaques. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:2943-2946.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. 21
  41. Saunders, K. A., and J. Greenman. 2000. The formation of mixed culture biofilms of oral species along a gradient of shear stress. J. Appl. Microbiol. 89:564-572.[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. 22
  43. Sutherland, I. W. 1999. Biofilm matrix polymers—role in adhesion, p. 49-62. In H. N. Newman and M. Wilson (ed.), Dental plaque revisited: oral biofilms in health and disease. BioLine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
  44. 23
  45. Wilson, M. 1999. Use of constant depth film fermentor in studies of biofilms of oral bacteria. Methods Enzymol. 310:264-279.[Medline]
  46. 24
  47. Wilson, M. 2001. Bacterial biofilms and human disease. Sci. Prog. 84:235-254.[Medline]


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2005, p. 1114-1116, Vol. 71, No. 2
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.71.2.1114-1116.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hope, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hope, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hope, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, M.