Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2005, p. 1659-1661, Vol. 71, No. 3
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.71.3.1659-1661.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling,1 Plymouth Marine Laboratory, West Hoe, Plymouth,2 Southampton Oceanography Centre, School of Ocean and Earth Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom3
Received 25 June 2004/ Accepted 9 October 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Observations were made in subpolar waters to the south of Iceland within an anticyclonic eddy with a cold surface temperature anomaly (6, 12). A patch of the tracer SF6 was deployed at the eddy center (5), and the research vessel operated in Lagrangian mode by analyzing surface SF6 concentrations continuously (4). Seawater samples were obtained during conductivity-temperature-depth hydrocasts, and the abundance of C. pelagicus cells was determined by flow cytometry (13). For RNA, near-surface (
2.5-m depth) seawater samples (10 to 20 liters) were rapidly filtered (<10 min) onto 90-mm-diameter Whatman GF/C filters, and the filters were stored at 70°C in extraction buffer (15) following snap-freezing in a propan-2-ol cooling bath. RNA was isolated and prepared for Northern analysis (16) under the hybridization conditions described below.
An internal region of rbcL was amplified from DNA isolated from C. pelagicus cells collected at the study site (16) and from laboratory cultures of the haptophytes Emiliania huxleyi and Pavlova salina. The identity of the products was confirmed by comparison to previously published sequences (2, 3), and sense strand in vitro transcription products were synthesized as previously described (16). Northern slot blots were hybridized at 55°C in Easy-Hyb solution (Roche) amended with 25 ng of C. pelagicus rbcL probe DNA (labeled with digoxigenin-dUTP) ml1. Stringency washes were performed on the following day with 0.05x SSPE (1x SSPE is 150 µM NaCl, 10 µM Na2HPO4, 1 µM EDTA)-0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate at 68°C, and hybrids were detected with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antidigoxigenin in conjunction with the chemiluminescent substrate CDP-Star (Roche). This hybridization protocol enables the specific detection of C. pelagicus rbcL mRNA and was optimized empirically by testing in vitro transcription products under conditions of increasing stringency (Fig. 1). Like the rbcL genes of the other coccolithophorids that have been characterized to date, the nucleotide sequence of the fragment from E. huxleyi is 88 to 89% identical to that of C. pelagicus whereas rbcL from noncalcifying P. salina is less closely related (86% identical).
![]() View larger version (62K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Northern slot blot assays of sense strand in vitro rbcL transcription products probed with a digoxigenin-labeled fragment of rbcL from C. pelagicus. The upper luminograph shows the results obtained under suboptimal posthybridization wash conditions (0.2x rather than 0.05x SSPE in the stringency washes), while the lower luminograph shows the high specificity of the probe once the optimal hybridization protocol (see text) had been established.
|
20 m that extended to a depth of 40 to 50 m (Fig. 2).
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Depth profiles of temperature ( ), chlorophyll concentrations (), and beam attenuation ( ) through the upper 100 m of the water column at the eddy center on 20, 21, and 22 June 1996. The histograms show the vertical distribution of C. pelagicus biomass observed at discrete depths sampled during the midday (gray bars) and midnight (black bars) hydrocasts. Greenwich mean times are shown.
|
40% of the daily maximum, was found to be 4:48 a.m. (r = 0.812, 0.002 < P < 0.005), indicating that there was significant clustering around the daily peak in gene expression during both diel cycles. The excellent reproducibility of the rhythm between days was confirmed also by nonlinear regression analysis (r2 = 0.805, P < 0.0001).
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Diel variability in the abundance of C. pelagicus rbcL mRNA normalized to the maximum hybridization signal recorded during each diel cycle (top panel). The bottom panel shows a three-parameter Gaussian regression (SigmaPlot for Windows, version 8.02) of the combined data set from both diel cycles and the temporal variability in photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in the 24-h period between 2100 on 19 June and 2100 on 20 June (light gray) and the 24-h period between 2100 on 21 June and 2100 on 22 June (dark gray). The temporal resolution of the irradiance data is 1 min and was logged with a 4 collector mounted on the unshaded upper deck of the research vessel. GMT, Greenwich mean time.
|
Evidently, there is considerable heterogeneity in the diel regulation of RubisCO gene expression between and within different taxonomic classes of marine chromophytic algae. To what extent this reflects differences in genetic controls, the life cycle of individual species, or environmental variability is worthy of further investigation to establish its ecological significance. It has been proposed, for instance, that differences in the diel pattern of RubisCO expression between chromophytes and the picocyanobacteria indicate that they occupy different temporal niches (8). This study has shown that this may not always be the case since the diel rhythm in C. pelagicus RubisCO expression reported here is very similar to that of natural populations of Synechococcus spp. from the same oceanic region (15).
We thank the officers, crew, and technicians of RRS Discovery for logistical support and outstanding service during cruise D221. Kirsty Park (University of Stirling) gave valuable advice and assistance with the statistical analyses.
Dedicated to the memory of contributing author John T. Davies, who tragically passed away in 2003 after years of struggle in an imperfect world. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»