Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2005, p. 1964-1970, Vol. 71, No. 4
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.71.4.1964-1970.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Efficient Production of L-Lactic Acid by Metabolically Engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a Genome-Integrated L-Lactate Dehydrogenase Gene
Nobuhiro Ishida,
,1*
Satoshi Saitoh,2,
Kenro Tokuhiro,1
Eiji Nagamori,1
Takashi Matsuyama,1
Katsuhiko Kitamoto,3 and
Haruo Takahashi1
Biotechnology Laboratory, Toyota Central R&D Labs Inc.,1
Toyota Biotechnology & Afforestation Laboratory, Toyota Motor Co., Aichi,2
Department of Biotechnology, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan3
Received 26 July 2004/
Accepted 6 November 2004

ABSTRACT
We developed a metabolically engineered yeast which produces
lactic acid efficiently. In this recombinant strain, the coding
region for pyruvate decarboxylase 1 (
PDC1) on chromosome XII
is substituted for that of the
L-lactate dehydrogenase gene
(
LDH) through homologous recombination. The expression of mRNA
for the genome-integrated
LDH is regulated under the control
of the native
PDC1 promoter, while
PDC1 is completely disrupted.
Using this method, we constructed a diploid yeast transformant,
with each haploid genome having a single insertion of bovine
LDH. Yeast cells expressing
LDH were observed to convert glucose
to both lactate (55.6 g/liter) and ethanol (16.9 g/liter), with
up to 62.2% of the glucose being transformed into lactic acid
under neutralizing conditions. This transgenic strain, which
expresses bovine
LDH under the control of the
PDC1 promoter,
also showed high lactic acid production (50.2 g/liter) under
nonneutralizing conditions. The differences in lactic acid production
were compared among four different recombinants expressing a
heterologous
LDH gene (i.e., either the bovine
LDH gene or the
Bifidobacterium longum LDH gene): two transgenic strains with
2µm plasmid-based vectors and two genome-integrated strains.

INTRODUCTION
Plant- and crop-based renewable plastics (
23), including polylactic
acid, are polymeric materials that could be produced with a
fermentation process and would be biodegraded to H
2O and CO
2 finally (
25). In the sustainable society to come, renewable
plastics should be available at a lower price than petroleum-based
plastics currently in use. Lactic acid, which is used as a monomer
for polymerization into polylactic acid, has a global market
in excess of 100,000 tons per year (
11), and further increased
demand is predicted. Lactic acid is generally produced with
lactic acid bacteria (
22), such as
Lactobacillus species, which
are hard to cultivate at high density and show high auxotrophy
regarding growth (
13). During lactic acid fermentation, a low
pH has inhibitory effects on cell growth and lactic acid production.
While chemicals (CaCO
3, NaOH, or NH
4OH) are added to neutralize
lactic acid, the processes are limited by the difficulty in
the regeneration of precipitated lactates. With the potential
demand for an increase in lactic acid production comes a greater
interest in finding another approach to producing lactic acid.
Yeasts, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, are more tolerant to low pHs than lactic acid bacteria. Recently, new methods for producing lactic acid with genetically engineered yeast have been developed and applied for large-scale production on a trial basis. In ethanol fermentation, pyruvic acid is converted into acetaldehyde by pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC; EC 4.1.1.1), and then the acetaldehyde is converted into ethanol by alcohol dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.1) (29). A transgenic yeast expressing exogenous L-lactate dehydrogenase (L-LDH; EC 1.1.1.27) could produce lactic acid from pyruvic acid. Such metabolically engineered yeasts were first reported by Dequin and Barre (7) and Porro et al. (4, 27), who showed that the recombinants yielded about 10 to 20 g of lactate/liter. In both cases, a considerable amount of ethanol was produced concurrently because S. cerevisiae predominantly produces ethanol under anaerobic conditions. The by-product ethanol has become a problem in lactic acid fermentation with a transgenic yeast.
There are three structural PDC genes, PDC1, PDC5 (33, 34), and PDC6 (15), in the S. cerevisiae genome. To increase the metabolic flow from pyruvic acid to lactic acid, a mutant strain, such as the pdc1, pdc5 (1), or adh1 (35) mutant strain, was utilized as the genetic background for obtaining an L-LDH gene-expressing yeast. However, a remarkable improvement in L-lactic acid production has not been observed. In addition to the fact that the PDC activity in yeast is due mainly to PDC1, PDC5 was observed to compensate for a PDC1 deficit, because PDC1 deletion led to a great increase in PDC5 promoter-driven mRNA expression (14). A double mutant strain with pdc1 and pdc5 exhibited significantly impaired growth on glucose medium (9, 10). The other approach for lactic acid production involved the use of a Crabtree-negative yeast, such as Kluyveromyces lactis (28). K. lactis has a single PDC1 gene, KlPDC1, expressing PDC activity (2). Bianchi et al. used K. lactis strains lacking either PDC activity or PDC and PDH activities, transformed with the LDH gene placed under the control of the promoter of KlPDC1 gene and cloned into stable multicopy vector. Transgenic K. lactis strains showed remarkable improvement under the fed-batch condition (3).
To achieve mass production of lactic acid by using S. cerevisiae, we have developed a recombinant strain that produces lactic acid efficiently. In this study, we found, firstly, genome-integrated LDH was regulated under the control of the PDC1 promoter. Secondly, PDC1 was completely inactive. Also, two LDHs, i.e., bovine and Bifidobacterium longum LDHs, were compared, and they were compared with lactic acid-producing yeasts reported so far.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains and media.
The
Escherichia coli strain used for molecular cloning was JM109
(TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan).
E. coli cultivation and medium were
as described previously (
32). The
S. cerevisiae OC-2T (
a/
trp1/trp1)
was derived from the wine yeast strain IFO2260 (
30). The culture
medium used for
S. cerevisiae was YPD medium (1% Bacto yeast
extract, 2% Bacto peptone, 2% glucose, wt/vol).
Synthesis of an L-LDH gene.
Bovine (GenBank accession number D90141) (17) and B. longum (GenBank accession number M33585) (24) LDH sequences were designed based on major codon usage according to the database on S. cerevisiae (Codon Usage Database [http://www.kazusa.or.jp/codon/]). The amino acids sequences encoded by these sequences were the same as those in the database. The experimental method was that of Horton et al. (16). Each oligonucleotide primer was synthesized at 100-mer intervals (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany) and then fused with the overlapping region by PCR. In the PCR, KOD DNA polymerase (TOYOBO) was used for amplification. Each fragment was subcloned into the pBluescript II SK(+) vector (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.) according to a previous report (32). The ligase reaction was performed with a Lig Fast rapid DNA ligation system (Promega, Madison, Wis.), and the competent cells used for transformation were of the E. coli JM109 strain. To confirm the subcloning of the vector, the nucleotide sequence was determined with an ABI PRISM 310 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). The resulting fragments were named LDHKCB (bovine LDH) and LDHKCL (B. longum LDH).
Construction of plasmid vectors.
Maps of the plasmids used in this study are shown in Fig. 1, and the vectors in which the L-LDH gene was replaced were pBTRP-PDC1P-LDHKCB and pBTRP-PDC1P-LDHKCL. 2µm-based multicopy plasmid vectors, including pESC-LDHKCB (Fig. 1A) and pESC-LDHKCY, consisted of the PDC1 promoter and LDH within the pESC-TRP vector (Stratagene). Also, the pBBLE-
pdc1 vector consisted of the PDC1 promoter, the Tn5 BLE gene cassette, and a PDC1 downstream fragment. The phleomycin resistance gene was the bleomycin gene (Tn5 BLE) of bacterial transposon Tn5 (11), which was fused downstream from the S. cerevisiae TDH3 (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 3) promoter. Integration vectors, including pBTRP-PDC1-LDHKCB (Fig. 1B) and pBTRP-PDC1-LDHKCY, consisted of the PDC1 promoter, LDH, TRP1 (tryptophan requiring 1), and the PDC1 downstream fragment. TRP1 was obtained by treating pRS404 (Stratagene) with AatII and SspI and ligating it to the pBluescript II SK(+) vector treatment with T4 DNA polymerase. Each fragment was isolated by PCR using the genomic DNA of the S. cerevisiae OC-2T strain as a template. Genomic DNA was prepared using a Fast DNA kit (Qbiogene, Carlsbad, Calif.), and the concentration was determined with an Ultrospec 300 spectral photometer (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). KOD DNA polymerase was used for PCR amplification, and the primers and their oligonucleotide sequences were as follows. For the PDC1 promoter fragment, PDC1P-U had the sequence 5'-ATATATGGATCCGCGTTTATTTACCTATCTC-3', containing a BamHI restriction site (underlined), and PDC1P-D had the sequence 5'-ATATATGAATTCTTTGATTGATTTGACTGTG-3', containing an EcoRI restriction site (underlined). For the PDC1 downstream fragment, PDC1D-U had the sequence 5'-ATATATCTCGAGGCCAGCTAACTTCTTGGTCGAC-3', containing a XhoI restriction site (underlined). This fragment was upstream 705 bp from the PDC1 open reading frame (ORF) start codon. PDC1D-D had the sequence 5'-ATATATGGGCCCCTCGTCAGCAATAGTGGTCAAC-3', containing an ApaI restriction site (underlined). For the PDC1 3' end, the PDC1 downstream fragment of 518 bp in length was between +501 and +1,018 from the PDC1 ORF start codon. The amplification fragments were treated with each restriction enzyme (TaKaRa BIO, Otsu, Japan) and were ligated to a vector, and all plasmids constructed in this work were obtained by using standard techniques (32).
Yeast transformation.
S. cerevisiae transformation was performed by the lithium acetate
procedure of Ito et al. (
18). Host strain OC-2T is a diploid
and homothallic strain (
30). Spore formation was performed on
sporulation plates (1% acetate, 0.1%
D-glucose, 0.1% yeast extract,
and 2% agar, wt/vol). Diploid formation was performed using
the homothallic property, and tetrads were dissected under an
optical microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and a micromanipulator
(Narishige Science, Tokyo, Japan). After the colonies had been
isolated, the target gene introduction was confirmed by PCR.
Construction of YEp multicopy control strains.
Recombinant strains, such as YEBL-8A and YEBO-1B, were constructed in the following way. By use of the pBBLE-
pdc1 vector, a PDC1 deletion strain was constructed. After the colonies had been isolated, the PDC1 deletion was confirmed by PCR. Next, the pESC-LDHKCY and pESC-LDHKCB vectors were introduced into these strains, and the recombinants were named YEBL-8A and YEBO-1B, respectively.
Construction of PDC1 integration strains.
Recombinant strains, such as YIBL-2D and YEBO-7A, were constructed in the following way (Fig. 2A). By use of the pBTRP-PDC1-LDHKCB vector, the heterozygous integrated strain was constructed. But the PDC1 gene in this transformant was not completely deleted, because the OC-2T strain is a homothallic yeast. The LDH gene on one side of the chromosome could be amplified, and the PDC1 gene was completely deleted upon spore formation (Fig. 2B).
Enzyme-specific activity in cell extracts.
Cell extracts were prepared with a SONIFIER 250 (Branson) as
described previously (
29). PDC-specific activity in freshly
prepared extracts, as described by Pronk et al. (
29), was determined
by using 6a Ubest-55 spectrophotometer at 340 nm (Japan Spectroscopic,
Tokyo, Japan). LDH-specific activity was determined in freshly
prepared extracts as described by Minowa et al. (
24). Protein
concentrations in cell extracts were determined with a DC protein
assay kit (Bio-Rad, Richmond, Calif.) by using bovine serum
albumin (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) as a standard.
Fermentation.
Fermentation experiments were performed at 30°C in 100-ml flasks with working volumes of 40 ml in YPD10 medium (1% Bacto yeast extract, 2% Bacto peptone, 10% D-glucose) containing 3% sterilized calcium carbonate. The inoculum was prepared by transferring strains from stock cultures to flasks containing 5 ml of YPD medium. Each culture was incubated for 72 h at 30°C on a shaker and then transferred to the fermentation medium of 0.1% packed cell volume at the inoculum size. The glucose, lactic acid, and ethanol concentrations were measured with a biosensor BF-4 S instrument (Oji Keisoku Kiki, Hyogo, Japan).

RESULTS
Lactate production with multicopy plasmids.
We constructed two kinds of recombinant yeasts expressing a
heterologous
LDH gene, bovine
LDH or
B. longum LDH (Table
1),
under the control of the
PDC1 promoter using a 2µm plasmid-based
vector (Fig.
1A). The recombinants with the
PDC1 deletion showed
no significant differences in either PDC or LDH activities,
and the level of PDC activity was one-third of that in the case
in which OC-2T was used as the host strain (Table
2). The YEBO-1B
strain, which expresses bovine
LDH, was cultivated for 72 h,
and the yields of lactate and ethanol were 16.3 g/liter and
34.3 g/liter, respectively (Fig.
3A). The yield of lactate for
YEBL-2D, which expresses
B. longum LDH, was almost the same
as that for YEBO-1B (Fig.
3B), with no difference in yield being
seen between the two kinds of LDH.
Lactate production with PDC1 integration.
We constructed two other lactate-producing yeast recombinants,
YIBL-2D (
B. longum LDH) and YIBO-7A (bovine
LDH), with integration
in the
PDC1 locus (Table
1). For the initial physiological characterization,
the growth rates of these
PDC1-disrupted recombinants were determined
in shake flask cultures on YPD medium. On analysis of the absorbency
at an optical density at 600 nm, both transgenic strains were
found to grow exponentially, with a growth rate of 1.73/h, while
that of OC-2T was 1.85/h. Compared to the host strain, suppression
of the growth rate was not observed, although the
PDC1 gene
was disrupted. The LDH-specific activities of both YIBL-2D and
YIBO-7A were clearly higher than those of the transgenic strains
including a multicopy plasmid, although these recombinants have
only two copies of the
LDH genes (Table
2). The PDC-specific
activities of the four recombinant strains were one-third of
that of the OC-2T host strain and seemed to be the same. The
YIBO-7A strain expressing bovine
LDH under the control of the
PDC1 promoter was observed to produce both lactate (55.6 g/liter)
and ethanol (16.9 g/liter), with up to 62.2% of the glucose
being transformed into lactic acid (Fig.
4B). YIBL-2D, the other
strain which expresses the
B. longum L-LDH gene, produced 25.7
g of
L-lactate/liter and 31.1 g of ethanol/liter (Fig.
4A).
Two genome integration recombinants, YIBL-2D and YIBO-7A, exhibited
high levels of production of lactate compared with those of
the YEBO-1B and YEBL-8A strains including a multicopy plasmid,
although the genome-integrated strains maintained only two
LDH genes. However, the yield of lactate with YEBO-7A expressing
bovine
LDH was almost twice that with YEBO-1B, and an effect
of bovine
LDH and
B. longum LDH was observed clearly for the
two genome-integrated strains. This difference in production
on account of the different
LDH genes was not observed for the
multicopy strain.
Lactic acid production under nonneutralizing conditions.
The production of lactic acid was examined by cultivation under
nonneutralizing conditions without CaCO
3. The accumulations
of lactic acid and ethanol are shown in Fig.
5. The YIBO-7A
strain, which had integrated the bovine
LDH gene, gave yields
of 50.2 g of lactic acid/liter and 16.7 g of ethanol/liter.
The glucose was completely consumed in 72 h in the case of neutralizing
conditions. The final pH was 2.8. The effect of changing the
initial glucose concentration from 100 to 150 g/liter on the
yield of the lactic acid production was examined. However, as
judged by fermentation analysis, under the nonneutralizing conditions,
an improvement of the lactic acid production was not observed;
it did not reach 50 g/liter or more (data not shown).

DISCUSSION
In this study, we developed a recombinant yeast exhibiting efficient
lactate production by substituting the coding region of
PDC1 on chromosome XII for that of
LDH through homologous recombination
(Fig.
2). This method allowed robust gene expression under the
control of the native
PDC1 promoter. Steady lactate production
was also maintained with the recombinant strain that was subcultured
two times in nonselective medium (data not shown). For
LDH expression
in yeast, a YEp multicopy plasmid is generally used, but remarkable
improvement of lactate production was not observed in this study
(Table
3). In the case of multicopy strains, it was expected
that unstable
LDH expression would decrease the number of intracellular
plasmids in nonselective medium. However, genome integration
does not affect the number of
LDH genes during fermentation;
therefore, steady expression according to the promoter occurs.
The comparison with transgenic yeast is shown in Table
4. In
the batch culture condition, it can be confirmed that the strain
of this report shows a high yield of lactic acid. A transgenic
strain in which the
Lactobacillus plantarum LDH gene was integrated
into the genome was developed recently by Colombié et
al.; this recombinant yields about 58 g of lactate/liter (
6).
The
ADH1 promoter was used for the expression of the heterogeneous
gene. In this study, we used the native
PDC1 promoter on chromosome
XII.
PDC1 encoded pyruvate decarboxylase, which converts pyruvic
acid to acetaldehyde and plays an important role in the production
of ethanol. In general, host strain OC-2T was able to produce
a high level of ethanol, even with a high glucose concentration;
besides, only
PDC1 usually worked for the production of ethanol.
The choice to use this promoter was based on the fact that the
expression of
PDC1 is strongly induced by glucose (
20), and
glucose-responding elements in
S. cerevisiae have already been
reported (
5,
21). It is advantageous to use the
PDC1 promoter
for fermentation with a high initial glucose level. Similarly,
Bianchi et al. used
KlPDC1 promoter for bovine
LDH expression.
Transgenic
K. lactis strains showed 60 g of lactic acid/liter
under the fed-batch condition, but it expended 500 h (
28). Our
S. cerevisiae strain disrupted only
PDC1 and not
PDC5, and genome-integrated
LDH was regulated under the control of the native
PDC1 promoter.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 3. L-Lactic acid and ethanol productions from wild-type and transgenic strains during batch growth on 10% (wt/vol) glucose-based YPD medium
|
In the experiment using
B. longum and bovine LDH, an improvement
in lactate production was observed in the case of the integrated
bovine LDH recombinant; however, a remarkable change was not
observed in the case of a YEp-based multicopy plasmid (Table
4). The two LDHs were found to differ in amino acid level (40.3%
identity; the calculation was performed with genetic analysis
software GENETYX version 7.0.2). In order to determine the substrate
affinity for pyruvic acid, bovine LDH was examined (
Km, 0.13
mM;
Vmax, 3,333 U/mg of protein) (data not shown). Also, the
Km value for pyruvate of
B. longum LDH has already been reported
(
Km, 1.05 mM;
Vmax, 1,670 U/mg of protein) (
19). The two LDHs
are different in substrate affinities and enzyme activity levels.
Because steady gene expression can be expected in the genome-integrated
strain compared with a recombinant constructed with the YEp
vector, it is considered that the differences in enzyme characteristics
between the two LDHs were reflected by the lactic acid production.
The combination of bovine
LDH and the native
PDC1 promoter on
the genome is important for the efficient production of lactic
acid.
The maximal concentration of lactate with YIBO-7A, which expresses bovine LDH under the control of the PDC1 promoter, was 58.8 g/liter under neutralizing conditions (Table 4). This recombinant, including two copies of the LDH gene on the genome, showed higher production than the transgenic strain, which had integrated one copy of the LDH gene on the genome (data not shown). It will be possible to improve the lactate production by increasing the number of LDH genes through genome integration. An analysis of a recombinant with an increased copy number of LDH is described elsewhere (31). On the other hand, if lactic acid is obtained directly under nonneutralizing conditions without a desalination process, lowering the cost on a manufacturing scale is possible. It has been pointed out that for a conventional method involving lactic acid bacteria, the process of desalination of lactate is a factor that increases the cost. In the case of lactic acid bacteria, it has been reported that the use of the genome-shuffling method improves the low pH tolerance (26). S. cerevisiae is well known to grow and survive at low pHs compared with lactic acid bacteria. Lactic acid production under nonneutralizing conditions was attempted by using a transgenic yeast (1, 7, 28, 35), but this production has not been reported so far. The present strain, which expresses bovine LDH under the control of the PDC1 promoter, exhibited high lactic acid production (50.2 g/liter) without pH control (Table 4). This result might lead to lactic acid fermentation that does not need the desalination process. But the level of lactic acid production did not become 50 g/liter or more. The final pH was 2.8, and it was expected that the low pH suppressed the lactic acid production. To improve the production under nonneutralizing conditions, it is important to make more progress regarding the low pH tolerance of intracellular LDH or host cells. S. cerevisiae is a suitable microorganism for an industrial scale. This strategy could be useful for applications for lactic acid production other than the use of lactic acid bacteria.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Masana Hirai, Toru Onishi, Osamu Saotome, and Noriko
Yasutani for valuable discussions and Takao Imaeda and Chikara
Miyazaki for the synthesis of an
L-LDH gene. We also thank Rie
Yamaguchi, Miyoko Imoto, Wakana Takase, Junko Akimoto, and Keiko
Uemura for technical assistance.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Biotechnology Laboratory, Toyota Central R&D Labs Inc., Nagakute-cho, Aichi 480-1192, Japan. Phone: 81-561-63-5375. Fax: 81-561-63-6498. E-mail:
e1168{at}mosk.tytlabs.co.jp.

N.I. and S.S. contributed equally to this work. 

REFERENCES
1 - Adachi, E., M. Torigoe, S. Sugiyama, J. Nikawa, and K. Shimizu. 1998. Modification of metabolic pathways of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by the expression of lactate dehydrogenase and deletion of pyruvate decarboxylase genes for the lactic acid fermentation at low pH value. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 86:284-289.[CrossRef]
2 - Bianchi, M. M., L. Tizzani, M. Destruelle, L. Frontali, and M. Wesolowski-Louvel. 1996. The "petite-negative" yeast Kluyveromyces lactis has a single gene expression pyruvate decarboxylase activity. Mol. Microbiol. 19:27-36.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Bianchi, M. M., L. Brambilla, F. Protani, C. L. Liu, J. Lievense, and D. Porro. 2001. Efficient homolactic fermentation by Kluyveromyces lactis strains defective in pyruvate utilization and transformed with the heterologous LDH gene. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:5621-5625.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Brambilla, L., D. Bolzani, C. Compagno, V. Carrera, J. P. van Dijken, J. T. Pronk, B. M. Ranzi, L. Alberghina, and D. Porro. 1999. NADH reoxidation does not control glycolytic flux during exposure of respiring Saccharomyces cerevisiae cultures to glucose excess. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 171:133-140.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 - Butler, G., and D. J. McConnell. 1988. Identification of an upstream activation site in the pyruvate decarboxylase structural gene (PDC1) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 14:405-412.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - Colombié, S., S. Dequin, and J. M. Sablayrolles. 2003. Control of lactate production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing a bacterial LDH gene. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 33:38-46.[CrossRef]
7 - Dequin, S., and P. Barre. 1994. Mixed lactic-alcoholic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing the Lactobacillus casei L(+)-LDH. Bio/Technology 12:173-177.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 - Dequin, S., E. Baptista, and P. Barre. 1999. Acidification of grape mutants by Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains genetically engineered to produce lactic acid. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 50:45-50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Flikweert, M. T., L. Van Der Zanden, W. M. Janssen, H. Y. Steensma, J. P. Van Dijken, and J. T. Pronk. 1996. Pyruvate decarboxylase: an indispensable enzyme for growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on glucose. Yeast 12:247-257.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Flikweert, M. T., M. Swaaf, J. P. Van Dijken, and J. T. Pronk. 1999. Growth requirements of pyruvate-decarboxylase-negative Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 174:73-79.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Gatignol, A., M. Baron, and G. Tiraby. 1987. Phleomycin resistance encoded by ble gene from transposon Tn5 as a dominant selective marker in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 207:342-348.[CrossRef][Medline]
12 - Hester, A. 2000. IB market forecast. Ind. Bioprocess 22:4-5.
13 - Hofvendahl, K., and B. Hahn-Hagerdal. 2000. Factors affecting the fermentative lactic acid production from renewable resources (1). Enzyme Microb. Technol. 26:87-107.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 - Hohmann, S., and H. Cederberg. 1990. Autoregulation may control the expression of yeast pyruvate decarboxylase structural genes PDC1 and PDC5. Eur. J. Biochem. 188:615-621.[Medline]
15 - Hohmann, S. 1991. Characterization of PDC6, a third structural gene for pyruvate decarboxylase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 173:7963-7969.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16 - Horton, R. M., H. D. Hunt, S. N. Ho, J. K. Pullen, and L. R. Pease. 1989. Engineering hybrid genes without the use of restriction enzymes: gene splicing by overlap extension. Gene 77:61-68.[CrossRef][Medline]
17 - Ishiguro, N., S. Osame, R. Kagiya, S. Ichijo, and M. Shinagawa. 1990. Primary structure of bovine lactate dehydrogenase-A isozyme and its synthesis in Escherichia coli. Gene 91:281-285.[CrossRef][Medline]
18 - Ito, H., Y. Fukuda, K. Murata, and H. Kimura. 1983. Transformation of intact yeast cells with treated with alkalications. J. Bacteriol. 153:163-168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19 - Iwata, S., T. Minowa, H. Saeki, and T. Ohta. 1989. Amino acid residues in the allosteric site of L-lactate dehydrogenase from Bifidobacterium longum. Agric. Biol. Chem. 53:3365-3366.
20 - Kellermann, E., and C. P. Hollenberg. 1988. The glucose- and ethanol-dependent regulation of PDC1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae are controlled by two distinct promoter regions. Curr. Genet. 14:337-344.[CrossRef][Medline]
21 - Liesen, T., C. P. Hollenberg, and J. J. Heinisch. 1996. ERA, a novel cis-acting element required for autoregulation and ethanol repression of PDC1 transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 21:621-632.[CrossRef][Medline]
22 - Marshall, V. M. 1987. Lactic acid bacteria: starters for flavor. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 46:327-336.[CrossRef]
23 - McLaren, J., and D. Faulkner. 1999. The technology roadmap for plant/crop-based renewable resources 2020. U.S. Department of Energy. [Online] http://www.eere.energy.gov/biomass/pdfs/ag_vision.pdf.
24 - Minowa, T., S. Iwata, H. Sakai, and T. Ohata. 1989. Sequence and characteristics of the Bifidobacterium longum gene encoding L-lactate dehydrogenase and primary structure of the enzyme; a new feature of the allosteric site. Gene 85:161-168.[CrossRef][Medline]
25 - Ozeki, E. 1996. Characteristics of poly (L-lactide) as biodegradable plastics. Shimadzu Rev. 53:1-8.
26 - Patnaik, R., S. Louie, V. Gavrilovic, K. Perry, W. P. C. Stemmer, C. M. Ryan, and S. del Cardayré. 2002. Genome shuffling of Lactobacillus for improved acid tolerance. Nat. Biotechnol. 20:707-712.[CrossRef][Medline]
27 - Porro, D., L. Barmbilla, B. M. Ranzi, E. Martegani, and L. Alberghina. 1995. Development of metabolically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells for the production of lactic acid. Biotechnol. Prog. 11:294-298.[CrossRef][Medline]
28 - Porro, D., M. M. Bianchi, L. Brambilla, R. Menghini, D. Bolzani, V. Carrera, J. Lievense, C. L. Liu, B. M. Ranzi, L. Frontali, and L. Alberghina. 1999. Replacement of a metabolic pathway for large scale production of lactic acid from engineered yeasts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:4211-4215.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29 - Pronk, J. T., H. Yde Steensma, and J. P. van Dijiken. 1996. Pyruvate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 12:1607-1633.[CrossRef][Medline]
30 - Saitoh, S., Y. Mieno, T. Nagashima, C. Kumagai, and K. Kitamoto. 1996. Breeding of a new type of baker's yeast by
-integration for overproduction of glucoamylase using a homothallic yeast. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 81:98-103.[CrossRef]
31 - Saitoh, S., N. Ishida, T. Onishi, K. Tokuhiro, E. Nagamori, K. Kitamoto, and H. Takahashi. Genetically engineered wine yeast produced a high concentration of L-lactic acid of extremely high optical purity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., in press.
32 - Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
33 - Schaalf, I., J. B. A. Green, D. Gozalbo, and S. Hohmann. 1989. A deletion of the PDC1 gene coding for pyruvate decarboxylase of yeast causes a different phenotype than previously isolated point mutations. Curr. Genet. 15:75-81.[CrossRef][Medline]
34 - Schmitt, H. D., M. Ciriacy, and F. K. Zimmermann. 1983. The synthesis of yeast pyruvate decarboxylase is regulated by large variations in the messenger RNA level. Mol. Gen. Genet. 192:247-252.[CrossRef][Medline]
35 - Skory, C. D. 2003. Lactic acid production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing a Rhizopus oryzae lactate dehydrogenase gene. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 67:22-27.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2005, p. 1964-1970, Vol. 71, No. 4
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.71.4.1964-1970.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Nevoigt, E.
(2008). Progress in Metabolic Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
72: 379-412
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ilmen, M., Koivuranta, K., Ruohonen, L., Suominen, P., Penttila, M.
(2007). Efficient Production of L-Lactic Acid from Xylose by Pichia stipitis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
73: 117-123
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Saitoh, S., Ishida, N., Onishi, T., Tokuhiro, K., Nagamori, E., Kitamoto, K., Takahashi, H.
(2005). Genetically Engineered Wine Yeast Produces a High Concentration of L-Lactic Acid of Extremely High Optical Purity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 2789-2792
[Abstract]
[Full Text]