AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Audisio, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Apella, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Audisio, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Apella, M. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Audisio, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Apella, M. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2005, p. 3373-3375, Vol. 71, No. 6
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.71.6.3373-3375.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

SHORT REPORT

Bacteriocin from Honeybee Beebread Enterococcus avium, Active against Listeria monocytogenes

M. Carina Audisio,1* Horacio R. Terzolo,2 and María C. Apella3,4

Instituto de Investigaciones para la Industria Química (INIQUI), A4402FDC-Salta, Salta,1 EEA Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria de Balcarce (EEA Balcarce), CC 276, 7620-Balcarce, Buenos Aires,2 Centro de Referencia para Lactobacilos (CERELA),3 Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Chacabuco 145, 4000-San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina4

Received 20 May 2004/ Accepted 30 December 2004


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 References
 
Enterococcus avium isolated from Apis mellifera beebread produces a thermoresistant bacteriocin with a strain-dependent inhibitory effect on Listeria and without effect on gram-negative bacteria. The bacteriocin appeared to be a polypeptide of about 6 kDa. Genetic analyses revealed no extrachromosomal material in E. avium.


   INTRODUCTION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
References
 
Our general objective is to characterize and select lactic acid bacteria (LAB) that may be of probiotic relevance (1-3). Beebread is processed pollen stored with the addition of various enzymes and honey, which is subjected to lactic acid fermentation (11) by LAB present in flowers, silage, and the environment. Enterococci have been isolated from vegetable matter, reptiles, and insects, but there are no references to these microorganisms associated with honeybees (9, 17). Since no previous studies of LAB associated with the common honeybee were found, we screened the Apis mellifera intestinal tract and beebread samples for these microorganisms.

Enterococcus avium PA1 was isolated from Streptococcus selective medium (1) incubated at 37°C for 24 to 48 h and characterized by biochemical tests (8), by carbohydrate fermentation pattern (APICH50), and on the basis of its 16S rRNA sequences.

Inhibition assays performed with E. avium PA1 cell-free supernatant (CFS) from brain heart infusion (BHI) broth were studied with the well diffusion assay (18). Twenty-three microliters of CFS was placed in wells cut in BHI agar plates previously seeded with the indicator strains (final concentration, ca. 1 x 109 CFU ml–1). The plates were incubated at 25 to 30°C for 12 to 24 h and examined for inhibition halos. The inhibitory substance suspension titer was determined by serial twofold dilution and expressed in arbitrary units (AU) per milliliter (7). Indicator strains and their sensitivities to E. avium PA1 CFS at pH 5.5 are indicated in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Indicator strains and their sensitivities to E. avium PA1 CFS at pH 5.5

 
The physicochemical nature of the antagonistic substance was determined by studying the anti-Listeria activity of the CFS at pH 5.5 heated to 121°C for 15 min in an autoclave and treated with proteolytic enzymes (trypsin, papain, {alpha}-chymotrypsin, and pepsin), catalase, and lysozyme. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis was performed with 20 µl CFS mixed with 7 µl of running buffer and heated at 100°C for 5 min (16). After 3 h electrophoresis at 65 V, gel was removed and assayed for molecular weight estimation and biological assay (4). Extrachromosomal material was also determined in E. avium PA1 cells (5).

The mode of action of bacteriocin on nonproliferating L. monocytogenes cells was studied. An overnight culture of L. monocytogenes 01/198 in BHI broth was harvested by centrifugation, and cells were resuspended in phosphate buffer (0.05 M, pH 7.00) to a final concentration of ca. 109 CFU ml–1. A bacteriocin solution was mixed in equal amounts with the cell suspension and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Counts of listeriae were determined on BHI agar (1.5%, wt/vol) incubated at 30°C for 24 h.

The assays were performed in triplicate. Data were analyzed by Tukey's test, and differences were considered significant at the P < 0.05 level.

The metabolite synthesized by E. avium PA1 did not inhibit Lactobacillus or gram-negative pathogens like Salmonella and Klebsiella spp. However, all Listeria sp. strains tested were inhibited. The effect was strain dependent, as shown in Table 1. The antimicrobial activity of E. avium PA1 CFS at pH 5.5 completely disappeared with the proteolytic enzyme treatment, but its action was unaffected by catalase or lysozyme. It was highly resistant to heat since its anti-Listeria activity persisted after 15 min at 121°C. The sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis of different CFS revealed only one band with biological activity against L. monocytogenes Scott A. Its molecular mass was around 6 kDa (data not shown). These results demonstrate the presence of a bacteriocin-like molecule (6, 10, 12, 13).

Listeria strains 01/01, 00-3/364, 01/155, and 99/267 were more resistant to the bacteriocin, while 01/2000, 99/625, and 99/128 were the most sensitive. Strains 00/270, 01/155, 01/01, 99/267, and 01/198 showed a double inhibition halo with well-defined colonies growing between both limits. The remaining Listeria strains presented lesser growth halos without detection of individual colonies, suggesting a bacteriostatic effect of the bacteriocin. This bacteriocin was bactericidal against L. monocytogenes 01/198 since the log number of viable cells fell from 9.08 ± 0.03 to 6.60 ± 0.04 after 2 h of contact with 11,130 AU ml–1 at 25°C. In contrast, the bacteriocin showed a bacteriostatic effect against those strains (L. monocytogenes 99/287; Listeria spp. 00-3/364 and 99/316) with a halo of lesser growth and no individual colonies. Therefore, caution should be exercised when generalizing about the bactericidal effect of bacteriocins synthesized by enterococci. We do not know yet whether the colonies growing in the halo are spontaneous bacteriocin-resistant cells or recovered cells after sublethal injury. Almost all enterococci tested were inhibited by bacteriocin, but E. faecium CRL1385 was totally resistant.

No bacteriocin synthesis was found at 4 or 10°C, and its production was not dependent on the growth medium. It was generated even in the presence of 1% (wt/vol) honey as the sole carbon source. In all cases, bacteriocin production started after 3 h of incubation at 37°C, as observed in E. faecium CRL1385 (15). The titer (22,260 AU ml–1) remained unchanged after 6 h of incubation and 24 h of culture. Besides, E. avium PA1 produced its bacteriocin in a high-ionic-strength medium (4.5% [wt/vol] NaCl) and after 24 h at 45°C (11,130 and 20,480 AU ml–1, respectively). The substance's stability in storage at diverse temperatures (–20°C, 4°C, and 25°C) and for several months was remarkable. It could thus be used in high-temperature industrial processes or as a promising natural alternative to control food-borne infection.

No plasmids were shown in E. avium PA1 with the techniques employed. Further experiments are being performed to confirm where the bacteriocin production information is encoded and thus determine the stability of this property. In previous assays with E. avium whole cells as the template, several PCRs were done using known enterocin primers such as ent A, ent B, ent P, ent L50 AB, ent AS-48, and bac 31 (10) but no products were obtained. Other experiments are being performed to determine if this is a new bacteriocin molecule.

Until now there has been no evidence of any bacteriocin produced by an E. avium strain (14). This bacterium's ability to inhibit honeybee pathogens would be used for honey preservation.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This paper was supported by PICT'2000 grants 08-09603 and 09-09645 and by CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina). M. C. Audisio and M. C. Apella are members of the Research Career of CONICET.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: INIQUI (Instituto de Investigaciones para la Industria Química), Universidad Nacional de Salta (UNSa), Buenos Aires 177, A4402FDC Salta, Argentina. Phone: 54 381 431 0465. Fax: 54 381 400 5600. E-mail: audisio{at}unsa.edu.ar. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 References
 

  1. Audisio, M. C. 1999. Estudios de bacterias lácticas con actividad antipatógena para el diseño de suplementos probióticos para aves. Ph.D. thesis. Universidad Nacional de Salta, Salta, Argentina.
  2. Audisio, M. C., G. Oliver, and M. C. Apella. 1999. Antagonistic effect of Enterococcus faecium J96 against human and poultry pathogenic salmonellae species. J. Food Prot. 62:751-755.[Medline]
  3. Audisio, M. C., G. Oliver, and M. C. Apella. 2001. Effect of different complex carbon sources on the growth of Enterococcus faecium CRL1385 and on its bacteriocin synthesis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 63:235-241.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Bhunia, A. K., M. C. Johnson, and B. Ray. 1987. Direct detection of an antimicrobial peptide of Pediococcus acidilactici in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J. Ind. Microbiol. 2:319-322.[CrossRef]
  5. Bruno-Bárcena, J. M., M. A. Azcárate-Peril, A. Ragout, F. de Váldez, R. Raya, and F. Siñeriz. 1998. Fragile cells of Lactobacillus casei suitable for plasmid DNA isolation. Biotechnol. Tech. 12:97-99.
  6. Cleveland, J., T. J. Montville, I. F. Nes, and M. L. Chikindas. 2001. Bacteriocins: safe, natural antimicrobials for food preservation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 71:1-20.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Daba, H., S. Pandian, J. F. Gosselin, R. E. Simard, J. Huang, and C. Lacroix. 1991. Detection and activity of a bacteriocin produced by Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:3450-3455.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Devriese, L. A., A. Van der Kerchove, R. Kilpper-Bälz, and K. H. Schleifer. 1987. Characterization and identification of Enterococcus species isolated from animals. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 37:257-259.[CrossRef]
  9. Egorova, A. L. 1971. Preservative microflora in stored pollen. Veterinariya 8:40-41.
  10. Ennahar, S., Y. Asou, T. Zendo, K. Sonomoto, and A. Ishizaki. 2001. Biochemical and genetic evidence for production of enterocins A and B by Enterococcus faecium WHE81. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 70:291-301.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Gilliam, M. 1979. Microbiology of pollen and bee bread: the yeasts. Apidologie 10:45-53.
  12. Giraffa, G. 1995. Enterococcal bacteriocins: their potential as anti-Listeria factors in dairy technology. Food Microbiol. 12:291-299.
  13. Jack, R., H. Tagg, and B. Ray. 1995. Bacteriocins of gram-positive bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 59:171-200.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Laukova, A., S. Czikkova, Z. Vasilkova, P. Juris, and M. Marekova. 1998. Occurrence of bacteriocin production among environmental enterococci. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 27:178-182.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Leroy, F., and L. De Vuyst. 2002. Bacteriocin production by Enterococcus faecium RZS C5 is cell density limited and occurs in the very early growth phase. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 72:155-164.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Schägger, H., and G. Von Jagow. 1987. Tricine SDS-PAGE for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal. Biochem. 166:368-379.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Snowdon, J. A., and D. O. Cliver. 1996. Microorganisms in honey. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 31:1-26.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Tagg, J. R., and A. R. McGiven. 1971. Assay system for bacteriocins. Appl. Microbiol. 21:943.[Medline]

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2005, p. 3373-3375, Vol. 71, No. 6
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.71.6.3373-3375.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Audisio, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Apella, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Audisio, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Apella, M. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Audisio, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Apella, M. C.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals