Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2006, p. 437-442, Vol. 72, No. 1
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.72.1.437-442.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Departamento de Producción Agraria, Universidad Pública de Navarra, 31006 Pamplona, Spain,1 Departamento de Genética, Universitat de Valencia, 46100 Burjassot, Spain2
Received 21 July 2005/ Accepted 12 October 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The primary pests targeted by Bt cotton technology in North America are the tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens, the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa zea, and the pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella. Throughout the rest of the world, Helicoverpa armigera is a primary pest with high resistance to organophosphate and pyrethroid insecticides that causes crop losses comparable to those caused by H. virescens in North America (29). According to the susceptibility of the above-described species to different lepidopteran-specific B. thuringiensis toxins, Cry1Ac cotton was selected as the best choice for commercial release. The second generation of Bt cotton combines Cry1Ac with a second B. thuringiensis toxin (Cry2Ab) and provides growers with a product that offers a broader spectrum of pest control and reduced chances of insects developing B. thuringiensis resistance (12, 45). Therefore, most commercially planted insect-resistant cotton contains Cry1Ac (in China, Bt cotton has been transformed to express a Cry1Ab-Cry1Ac hybrid toxin), which undoubtedly will pose an important selection pressure on the lepidopteran populations in the cotton ecosystem.
The genus Earias is widely distributed in the Old World and Australasia, and some are pests of considerable importance in many of cotton-growing countries of Africa and Asia. The spiny bollworm, Earias insulana (Boisduval), has an extremely wide range and is found throughout most of Africa and the Mediterranean region and eastwards to India, China, and Southeast Asia (38).
This species is an important component of the lepidopteran pest complex of cotton in some regions in Spain (7), Egypt (18), Israel (21), India, and Pakistan (25). Although it is a pest of cotton, it can also grow on other alternative host plants (2). Spiny bollworm causes damage by attacking terminal shoots, flower buds, and green bolls. The most serious damage to cotton is caused when larvae bore into the bolls, destroying the fiber, consuming seeds, and producing putrefaction due to the accumulation of feces and fungus. In some regions, if the attack is not controlled, E. insulana larvae can destroy all the cotton bolls in the field.
Virtually no quantitative data are available on the efficacy of single purified B. thuringiensis Cry proteins against E. insulana. In the present study, the insecticidal activity of 13 of the most common lepidopteran-specific Cry proteins was determined in terms of 50% lethal concentration (LC50) for neonate larvae of E. insulana. Assessment of the relative potency of these individual B. thuringiensis proteins is an important step in the determination of their insecticidal potential for control of this pest in cotton. Furthermore, since continuous exposure to Cry1Ac may result in the development of resistance to this toxin, we have addressed the possibility of Cry1Ac-resistant insects becoming resistant to other B. thuringiensis toxins. Considering that most cases of high levels of resistance to Cry proteins have been due to the alteration of a midgut membrane receptor (12), competition experiments between Cry1Ac and other active Cry proteins were performed to determine which toxins share a target site and therefore which toxins could lose their insecticidal properties if populations of E. insulana with an altered Cry1Ac binding site become common.
|
|
|---|
Bacillus thuringiensis Cry proteins.
The following Cry proteins were produced in recombinant B. thuringiensis strains (strain names are given in parentheses) expressing just one type of Cry protein: Cry1Aa3 (EG1273), Cry1Ab3 (EG7077), Cry1Ac4 (EG11070), Cry1Ba (EG19916), Cry1Ca2 (EG1081), Cry1Da (EG7300), Cry1Ea (EG11901), Cry1Fa1 (EG11096), and Cry1Ja1 (EG7279) (all obtained from Ecogen Inc., Langhorne, Pa.) Cry2Aa1 (EG7543) and Cry2Ab2 (EG7699) (supplied by Monsanto Co., Chesterfield, Mo.). Protoxin solubilization, trypsin activation, and toxin chromatography purification were performed as previously described (10). Cry1Ia7 was produced in recombinant Escherichia coli cultures in 2x tryptone yeast extract medium at 37°C and with constant shaking until exponential growth was achieved. The expression of the protein was induced by adding IPTG (isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside) and was purified by nickel columns. Cry1Ia7 was not trypsin activated, because this resulted in a loss of toxic activity for E. insulana larvae. Purified and activated Cry9Ca toxin (Lys mutant) was obtained from Bayer BioScience (N.V. Gent, Belgium). Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method (5) using bovine serum albumin as a standard.
Insect bioassays.
Insect bioassays involved incorporating the toxin protein into the insect artificial diet (30). First, the susceptibility of E. insulana larvae to each Cry toxin tested was determined at a high protein concentration (100 µg/ml) by incorporating the toxin into the diet that was fed to 25 neonate larvae. A second experiment involved determining the LC50 for active Cry proteins. The concentration range used for each Cry protein was determined in preliminary bioassays. The toxin was mixed with the artificial diet of the insect when it reached 50°C and then dispensed into 24-multiwell plates. A total of 30 neonate larvae were treated with each protein concentration, and a range of five concentrations (ranging from 40 µg/ml to 0.10 µg/ml) was used for each toxin. The bioassay was performed three times. Control insects were fed artificial diet without toxin. The multiwell plates were incubated at 25°C and 60% relative humidity with a 14-h light/10-h dark photoperiod. Mortality was recorded after 6 days. Concentration-mortality data were subjected to probit regression analysis (13) in the POLO-PC program (27). To assure that Cry proteins which showed no toxicity to E. insulana were not degraded, several of these proteins were also bioassayed against larvae of known susceptible species, namely, Spodoptera exigua, Plutella xylostella, and Lobesia botrana.
Toxin purification and labeling.
For binding assays, trypsin-activated toxins (except Cry1Ia) were further purified by anion-exchange chromatography with the Mono Q HR 5/5 column using a fast protein liquid chromatograph (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac were labeled with 125I by the chloramine-T method (47). Specific activities of the radio-iodinated toxins were analyzed by a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (47). The specific activities for 125I-labeled Cry1Ab (125I-Cry1Ab) and 125I-Cry1Ac were 2.9 mCi/mg and 1.8 mCi/mg, respectively. Cry1Ba, Cry1Ia, and Cry9Ca labeling was performed by biotinylation (Amersham Biosciences, N.J.) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Midgut isolation and BBMV preparation.
Final-instar larvae (L5) were dissected to obtain the whole insect midguts, which were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at 80°C until required. Brush border membrane vesicles (BBMV) were prepared by the MgCl2 precipitation method (48).
Binding experiments with 125I-Cry1Ac and 125I-Cry1Ab.
Binding experiments with E. insulana BBMV and 125I-Cry1Ac were performed as previously described (10) using the following conditions adapted for the spiny bollworm: 0.14 ng of 125I-Cry1Ac, 0.05 mg/ml BBMV, and a 1-h incubation time at room temperature in a final volume of 0.1 ml binding buffer (1 mM KH2PO4, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, pH 7.4, 0.1% bovine serum albumin). Competition experiments were carried out with increasing concentrations of unlabeled Cry1Ab, Cry1Ac, Cry1Ba, Cry1Ia, and Cry9Ca. Radioactivity incorporated into the BBMV after washing twice with cold binding buffer was measured directly in the microtubes in which the assays were performed by using a gamma counter (Compugamma 1282; LKB).
125I-Cry1Ab binding and competition assays with unlabeled Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac were performed as described above for 125I-Cry1Ac under the appropriate conditions (1 ng of 125I-Cry1Ab and 0.15-mg/ml BBMV concentration).
Binding data analyses to obtain the dissociation constants (Kd) and the concentrations of binding sites (Rt) were performed from the homologous competition experiments using the LIGAND program (31). Graphic representations and curve fitting were performed using the Graphpad Prism v.4.0 for Windows package (Graphpad Software, San Diego, Calif.).
Binding experiments with biotinylated toxins.
Binding experiments with the biotinylated toxins were carried out by incubating 25 µg of BBMV with the appropriate amount of labeled toxin (10 ng for Cry1Ba, 14 ng for Cry1Ia, and 20 ng for Cry9Ca). An excess of at least 400-fold of unlabeled toxin was added in the homologous and heterologous competition experiments. After centrifuging the binding mixture, the pellet in the microtube containing the toxin bound to the BBMV was suspended with 10 µl electrophoresis buffer and subjected to 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proteins were then electrotransferred onto a Hybond nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham) and blocked with 3% ECL blocking agent (Amersham) in TPBS buffer (1 mM KH2PO4, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, pH 7.4, 0.1% Tween 20). Biotinylated toxin bound to the BBMV was detected by incubating the membrane with streptavidin conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (Roche Diagnostics, Ind.) in TPBS according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The membrane was developed with an NBT/BCIP solution (Roche) in Genius 3 color buffer (100 mM NaCl, 50 mM MgCl2, 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9.5).
|
|
|---|
2 values generated in goodness-of-fit tests indicated that the probit model was appropriate for each toxin and insect colony tested (Tables 1 and 2). Probit regression lines could not be fitted in parallel, and so the relative potencies (RP) were expressed as the ratio of the LC50 values for each active Cry protein to the LC50 value for the Cry1Ac standard (39). The LC50 value of Cry1Ac toxin for E. insulana was selected as a reference because it is the usual toxin produced in transgenic cotton. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Toxicity of the active Cry proteins to neonate larvae of E. insulana from the Egyptian insect colonya
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Toxicity of the active Cry proteins to neonate larvae of E. insulana from the Spanish insect colonya
|
In the population from Spain, the RP values indicated that Cry9Ca was significantly more toxic than Cry1Ac by a factor of 1.33, whereas Cry1Ba and Cry1Da were 1.53 and 15.69 times less toxic than Cry1Ac. The concentration-mortality relationship and the relative potencies for Cry1Ab and Cry1Ia toxins could not be determined because the Spanish colony succumbed due to a bacterial infection. The toxins assayed showed different activities for the two experimental insect populations. The estimated RP values for Cry1Ac, Cry1Ba, and Cry9Ca toxins were 3.97, 2.54, and 1.97 times significantly more toxic in the population from Spain than in the population from Egypt, respectively. However, the RP of the Cry1Da toxin was similar in both populations.
Binding of Cry proteins to BBMV of E. insulana from Egypt.
To determine if binding sites were shared by more than one toxin, competition binding assays among the active toxins were performed. Using 125I-labeled Cry1Ac, competition assays indicated that Cry1Ab was the only toxin that competed for Cry1Ac binding sites (Fig. 1). The fact that there was some 125I-Cry1Ac binding that could not be competitively displaced by unlabeled Cry1Ab (even at the highest concentration used) suggests that there is a second binding site which is specific for Cry1Ac and to which Cry1Ab does not bind. The homologous competition curve (125I-Cry1Ac versus unlabeled Cry1Ac) fitted a one-site model, which indicates that the affinities of the two proposed binding sites for Cry1Ac must be similar. Quantitative estimates gave a Kd of 1.9 ± 1.2 nM and an Rt of 19 ± 3 pmol/mg for Cry1Ac binding sites. The other toxins tested (Cry1Ba, Cry1Ia, and Cry9Ca) did not compete for the Cry1Ac binding sites.
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. 125I-Cry1Ac binding to E. insulana BBMV at increasing concentrations of the following unlabeled competitors: Cry1Ab ( ), Cry1Ac (), Cry1Ba ( ), Cry1Ia ( ), and Cry9C ( ). Data for the competing toxins represent the means of three experiments, and error bars are the standard errors of the means. Data for the noncompeting toxins were replicated twice, and error bars are not shown for clarity.
|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. 125I-Cry1Ab binding to E. insulana BBMV at increasing concentrations of unlabeled Cry1Ab ( ) and Cry1Ac (). Data are the means of three experiments, and error bars represent the standard errors of the means.
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Binding of biotinylated toxins to E. insulana BBMV. (A) Binding of biotin-labeled Cry1Ba alone (lane 1) and in the presence of an excess of unlabeled Cry1Ba (lane 2) or unlabeled Cry1Ac (lane 3). (B) Binding of biotin-labeled Cry9Ca alone (lane 1) or in the presence of an excess of unlabeled Cry9Ca (lane 2) or unlabeled Cry1Ac (lane 3). (C) Binding of biotin-labeled Cry1Ia alone (lane 1) and in the presence of an excess of unlabeled Cry1Ia (lane 2) or Cry1Ac (lane 3).
|
|
|
|---|
Information on the insecticidal spectrum, potency, and mode of action of individual Cry proteins is critical to identify the most appropriate gene(s) for use in the development of B. thuringiensis-based control agents and insect-resistant transgenic plants. Among the Cry proteins known, only a limited number were included in this study. These Cry proteins were chosen because their activity towards species of the order Lepidoptera is well established. In our study, only 6 of the 13 Cry proteins assayed were toxic for E. insulana larvae. Cry9Ca was the most potent toxin for both colonies of E. insulana. For the colony from Egypt, Cry1Ab showed similar toxicity to Cry9Ca, followed jointly by Cry1Ba and Cry1Ac and finally by Cry1Da and Cry1Ia. In the population from Spain, the most active toxin was Cry9Ca, followed in decreasing order by Cry1Ac, Cry1Ba, and Cry1Da (Cry1Ab and Cry1Ia were not tested).
The occurrence of differential susceptibility to B. thuringiensis toxins has been demonstrated for numerous other insect pests, including other species of the genus Earias. A report on the related species Earias vitella indicated that Cry1Ab was more toxic than Cry1Aa and Cry1Ac (25). Our results with E. insulana showed that for the population from Egypt, Cry1Ab was also the most toxic among the assayed Cry1A proteins, with a relative potency 2.41 times higher than that of Cry1Ac. In contrast, the Cry1Aa toxin caused no mortality in our assays but resulted in larval growth inhibition, probably due to reduced feeding rates on toxin-contaminated diet, in both populations.
Variation in susceptibility to B. thuringiensis toxins has been reported among geographically distinct populations of a given species (15). In studies of 15 species of insects, only P. xylostella populations exhibited major differences in susceptibility that can be attributed to previous exposure to B. thuringiensis in the field (44). However, it is sometimes difficult to distinguish natural variation among susceptible populations from low to moderate resistance (12, 24). The present study did not address resistance per se because the relationship between the history of exposure and susceptibility was not examined. However, we report here on the baseline susceptibility to different individual Cry proteins in two different geographical populations of E. insulana, which might be a useful reference to measure changes in susceptibility given possible future exposure to Bt cotton crops.
Some of the proteins that showed activity against E. insulana (Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac) are present in strain HD1 of B. thuringiensis var. kurstaki (which contains Cry1Aa, Cry1Ab, Cry1Ac, and Cry2Aa), which is the active ingredient of many formulated bioinsecticides for the control of cotton pests including E. insulana (11). Evidently, the activity of the strain HD1 against E. insulana must be due to the presence of one or all of these proteins. A field population systematically treated with HD1-based insecticides may eventually result in the appearance of insects resistant to these Cry1A toxins.
The protection against E. insulana conferred by Cry1Ac in Bollgard cotton has been proven in field trials in southern Spain (35). Cry1Ac expressed in cotton provided better protection against E. insulana feeding damage than the conventional chemical insecticides. In transgenic plants, the efficacy of a determined Cry protein on a susceptible target insect is determined by the expression level required for effective control. Cry1Ac levels in Bollgard cotton declined steadily as the growing season progressed, ranging from 57.1 µg/g (dry weight) at 53 days after planting to 6.7 µg/g at 116 days after planting in fruit and from 163.4 µg/g at 53 days after planting to 34.5 µg/g at 116 days after planting in terminal foliage (17). If the results of our study are extrapolated for comparison with the expression level of Cry1Ac in transgenic plants, 1 µg of protein/ml of diet is equivalent to 6.23 µg of protein/g (dry weight) of diet (1 ml of diet had a dry weight of 160.4 mg). Therefore, the LC50 of Cry1Ac would be equivalent to 6.8 µg/g in the E. insulana population from Egypt and 1.7 µg/g in the population from Spain. The levels of Cry1Ac are sufficient to control E. insulana during the entire growing season; however, the relationship between Cry1Ac and its activity in the plant will likely be influenced by non-B. thuringiensis plant factors which, along with Cry1Ac, may be affected by the type and age of the plant tissue in question (17).
A possible risk in the use of transgenic plants is the potential development of pest resistance. One strategy to delay the development of resistance is the use of transgenic crops simultaneously expressing two or more insecticidal proteins with different modes of action (40). For this strategy to work, the two insecticidal proteins must not share key steps in the mode of action. Since the alteration of binding to midgut receptors seems to be the most important mechanism of resistance to B. thuringiensis toxins, determination of the binding sites of the active toxins can give us information on the possible risk of insects becoming resistant to more than one toxin by a change in a single receptor. Our results with labeled toxins show that among the toxins tested, Cry1Ab was the only one that shared common binding sites with Cry1Ac. This is a feature observed in all lepidopterans (3, 8, 9, 14, 19, 20), and it explains the basis of many cases of resistance to more than one B. thuringiensis toxin (12). It is interesting that Cry1Ac, in addition to the shared sites, also seems to have binding sites not shared with Cry1Ab in E. insulana, a feature not particularly common among lepidopteran species. To our knowledge, this model of Cry1Ac having binding sites shared with Cry1Ab and binding sites not shared with this toxin has only been proposed in two other insect species, H. virescens (47) and H. armigera (10).
In conclusion, the results obtained in this work show that E. insulana is susceptible to Cry1Ab, Cry1Ac, Cry1Ba, Cry1Da, Cry1Ia, and Cry9Ca. Cry1Ab and Cry9Ca were significantly more active than Cry1Ac, the toxin currently used in Bt cotton. From a resistance management standpoint, the most active proteins are good candidates for use in the control of this pest in addition to, or combination with, Cry1Ac, except for Cry1Ab, which shares binding sites with Cry1Ac. Cry9Ca is of particular interest since besides being the most active protein, it has a wide spectrum of toxicity that includes other important cotton pests, such as H. armigera, H. virescens, and Spodoptera littoralis (26, 37, 46).
This study was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology (grants AGL2000-0840 and AGL2003-09282) and the Generalitat Valenciana (grant GRUPOS2004-21). M.A.I. and A.E. received support from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Culture (grants FP2000-4923 and FP2000-5497).
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»