Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hilpertshauser, H. Articles by Mathis, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hilpertshauser, H. Articles by Mathis, A. Agricola Articles by Hilpertshauser, H. Articles by Mathis, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2006, p. 6503-6507, Vol. 72, No. 10
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.00823-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Babesia spp. Identified by PCR in Ticks Collected from Domestic and Wild Ruminants in Southern Switzerland

Heidi Hilpertshauser,¹ Peter Deplazes,¹ Manuela Schnyder,¹ Lise Gern,² and Alexander Mathis^1*

Institute of Parasitology, Medical and Vetsuisse Faculty of the University of Zürich, Winterthurerstr. 266a, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland,¹ Institut de Zoologie, Université de Neuchâtel, Emile-Argand 11, CH-2007 Neuchâtel, Switzerland²

Received 7 April 2006/ Accepted 23 July 2006

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Concurrent infections with vector-borne pathogens affected a cattle herd in Switzerland, and one of the pathogens was identified as Babesia bigemina, which had never been observed in this country before. Therefore, a survey of the occurrence of ruminant Babesia spp. and their tick vectors in Switzerland was conducted. A total of 2,017 ticks were collected from sheep, goats, cattle, and wild ruminants (deer, roe deer, and chamois) in southern parts of Switzerland and identified morphologically. The vast majority of the ticks (99.2%) were Ixodes ricinus, but 14 ticks from sheep and goats were identified as Dermacentor marginatus and two ticks from wild ruminants were identified as Hemaphysalis punctata. PCR analyses of 700 ticks revealed the presence of Babesia divergens (n = 6), Babesia sp. genotype EU1 (n = 14), and B. major (n = 2), whose suggested occurrence was confirmed in this study by molecular analysis, and the presence of novel Babesia sp. genotype CH1 (n = 4), which is closely related to B. odocoilei and to Babesia sp. genotype RD61 reported from North America. The identification of B. divergens and B. major in ticks collected from wild ruminants cast doubt on the postulated strict host specificity of these bovine Babesia species. Furthermore, the zoonotic Babesia sp. genotype EU1 was detected in ticks collected from domestic animals but was obtained predominantly from ticks collected from wild ruminants. More than one tick containing DNA of different Babesia spp. were collected from two red deer. Hence, the role of these game animals as reservoir hosts of Babesia spp. seems to be important but requires further investigation.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
A fatal disease outbreak of anaplasmosis affected a cattle herd in Chur, the capital city of the Grisons canton in eastern Switzerland (18). Together with Anaplasma spp. and Mycoplasma sp., concurrent infections with piroplasms were detected, which were identified by PCR and sequencing as Babesia bigemina, a large Babesia species, and Theileria belonging to the Theileria buffeli complex (H. Hilpertshauser, P. Deplazes, M. L. Meli, R. Hofmann-Lehmann, H. Lutz, and A. Mathis, submitted for publication). Both these piroplasm species are common bovine parasites in warmer climates in Europe but had never been observed in Switzerland before.

The occurrence of a large bovine Babesia sp. in Switzerland has been reported only once before. An infection with B. major, which is considered a species with low virulence, was suggested based on diagnosis by light microscopy of blood smears of a cow (7). In contrast, B. divergens, a small Babesia species, is sporadically observed as an organism causing clinical infections in several places in Switzerland, especially in the southern and western parts of the country (16).

The transmission of Babesia is thought to be strictly associated with ticks (15). By far the most common tick species in Switzerland is Ixodes ricinus (3), a proven vector of B. divergens, and DNA of this parasite has recently been detected by PCR in ticks collected in southern and western regions of Switzerland (9). Additional ticks that are found in Switzerland include other species in the genus Ixodes, Dermacentor marginatus, Dermacentor reticulatus, Hemaphysalis punctata, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus (3). The presence of Rhipicephalus bursa and Hemaphysalis sulcata on goats and cattle in southern parts of Switzerland was reported once (2), but these two species were not found in several subsequent investigations (3). H. punctata is a proven vector of B. major (27). However, none of the indigenous tick species of Switzerland is considered a vector of B. bigemina.

The aim of this study was to investigate further the epidemiology of B. bigemina in Switzerland. A survey was conducted of Babesia spp. in ticks collected from domestic ruminants and also from wild ruminants in Ticino and Poschiavo, two regions in southern Switzerland (south of the Alps).

(This work was part of the veterinary thesis of Heidi Hilpertshauser.)

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Collection of ticks.
In spring and/or summer 2004, ticks were collected from animals in two distinct southern alpine regions (Poschiavo Valley in Grisons canton and in Ticino canton) bordering northern Italy. A total of 916 ticks were collected from cattle, goats, and sheep from 14 farms in Poschiavo, and 1,101 ticks were collected from shot deer, roe deer, and chamois from the two areas in autumn 2004. Ticks were stored in 70% ethanol at 4°C. The species, stage, and gender of each tick were determined with a stereo microscope using the key of the University of Neuchâtel (11).

DNA extraction.
Ticks were processed individually or pooled in groups. Generally, three ticks from each animal were examined in one pooled sample, and, if the sample was positive for a Babesia sp., additional ticks from the same animal were analyzed individually. First, each tick was washed three times in sterile phosphate-buffered saline and then stored at –20°C. The frozen ticks were cut into pieces with ethanol-flamed scissors in 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes. DNA from fully engorged females was isolated from only the apical part, 400 µl of 25% Chelex (Bio-Rad) was added, and the samples were subjected to three cycles of freezing and thawing. Digestion with proteinase K (200 µg/ml; Roche, Mannheim, Germany) was performed by incubation at 56°C overnight. After centrifugation at maximum speed for 10 min, the supernatant was transferred into a fresh tube. DNA was isolated by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. DNA pellets were washed once with ice-cold 70% ethanol, air dried, and resuspended in 200 µl of Tris-HCl (10 mM, pH 8.4).

PCR.
Primers and cycling conditions used in this study are listed in Table 1. Primers with different specificities for Babesia spp. were deduced from the aligned GenBank entries for species of the genera Babesia and Theileria, as well as unspecified members of the Piroplasmida (see Fig. 1 for accession numbers), and the specificities were confirmed by BLAST searches. Each 100-µl PCR mixture contained 5 µl extracted DNA, buffer (50 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.4], 2.5 mM MgCl₂, 0.5% Tween 20), each deoxynucleoside triphosphate at a concentration of 0.2 mM (with dUTP replacing dTTP) (Sigma-Aldrich, Buchs, Switzerland), each primer (Table 1) at a concentration of 1 µM, and 0.5 U uracil DNA glycosylase (Sigma-Aldrich, Buchs, Switzerland); the uracil DNA glycosylase was used to control for PCR carryover contamination (24). An initial step at 37°C for 10 min was performed in an automatic thermal cycler. After 10 min of heat inactivation of the uracil DNA glycosylase, 2.5 U Taq polymerase (Sigma-Aldrich, Buchs, Switzerland) was added for a hot start, followed by 45 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 94°C, annealing for 30 s at the temperatures shown in Table 1, and extension for the times shown in Table 1 at 72°C and then a final incubation for 10 min at 72°C. Amplicons were visualized with ethidium bromide after electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gels.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Features of PCR primers used in this study and reaction conditions

View larger version (34K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Dendrogram of partial 18S rRNA gene sequences of Babesia spp. detected in ticks by PCR/sequencing and of selected piroplasmids (neighbor-joining analysis). The numbers at the nodes are bootstrap values based on 100 replicates. Bar = 0.1 mutation per site. Isolate designations (d, isolate from ticks collected from deer in Ticino; p, isolate from sheep and goats in the Poschiavo Valley) and GenBank accession numbers (in parentheses) are given. Isolates d86 (B. divergens), pd14 (isolate from ticks collected from deer from the Poschiavo Valley), and d49 (Babesia sp. genotype EU1) were omitted because of ambiguous sequence positions.

DNA sequencing was done by a private company (Microsynth, Balgach, Switzerland) either directly with the amplicons after DNA purification with a QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) or after another PCR with deoxynucleoside triphosphates containing dTTP and cloning into a TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) used according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Sequences were subjected to BLAST searches in GenBank, and a neighbor-joining tree was constructed in combination with the bootstrap method (26), using the aligned sequences (MultiAlin) (10).

To check whether amplifiable DNA was extracted, PCR (40 cycles) employing tick-specific primers was performed (Table 1).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The accession numbers for 11 sequences determined in this study that have been deposited in the GenBank database are shown in Fig. 1.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Tick species.
The vast majority of the 2,017 ticks collected both from domesticated ruminants and from wild ruminants were identified as I. ricinus (n = 2,001) (Table 2). Collection from sheep and goats in the spring and summer also yielded a few nymphs and larvae of I. ricinus. The ticks collected from sheep and goats in the spring included 14 D. marginatus adults. Two adult H. punctata ticks were collected from a roe deer and a red deer in Ticino.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Identification of ticks collected in southern Switzerland from animals in spring, summer, and autumn 2004 and Babesia spp. detected in ticks by PCR and sequencing or specific PCRa

Sequence analysis of Babesia DNA detected in ticks.
First, PCR with primers detecting a broad range of Babesia spp. (Table 1) was performed. Hence, for 700 ticks analyzed, DNA of Babesia spp. was detected in 26 samples, and 21 amplicons were sequenced, revealing four different species or genotypes (Fig. 1). Isolates d13, d19, d86, and p12a clustered together with B. divergens. The sequences of 11 isolates (d7, d10, d15, d18, d27, d31, d49, d98, p3, p12b, and pd14) formed a group with Babesia sp. genotype EU1 (accession no. AY046575) amplified from blood samples from two human patients (17). Isolates d22 and d85 showed the highest level of identity (98%) with the single sequence of B. major that is available for this part of the 18S rRNA gene. A novel sequence more distantly related to known sequences and therefore designated Babesia sp. genotype CH1 (d6, d79, d81, and d104) was most closely related to sequences reported from North America, namely sequences of B. odocoilei and Babesia sp. (RD61).

DNA of Babesia spp. was detected in 26 samples employing PCR with broad specificity. PCR using specific primers revealed the presence of B. divergens and Babesia sp. genotype EU1 in two and three samples, respectively. Twenty-one amplicons were sequenced, revealing four different species or genotypes; these amplicons included 4 B. divergens amplicons, 11 Babesia sp. genotype EU1 amplicons, 4 Babesia sp. CH1 amplicons, and 2 B. major amplicons.

Detection of DNA of Babesia spp. in ticks.
Six I. ricinus females, one collected from a goat in Poschiavo, one collected from a chamois, and four collected from three red deer in Ticino, were infected with B. divergens (Table 3). Babesia sp. genotype EU1 was found not only in I. ricinus females from domesticated and wild ruminants in both Poschiavo and Ticino but also in two I. ricinus males and one H. punctata female. Analysis of I. ricinus collected from red deer revealed the presence of B. major in two female ticks. The novel sequence designated Babesia sp. genotype CH1 was obtained from four I. ricinus females picked from red deer in Ticino. More than one of the ticks collected from four red deer shot in Ticino contained DNA of Babesia spp. (Table 3). One male and one female I. ricinus from red deer 17 tested positive for Babesia sp. genotype EU1. Two B. divergens-positive ticks from red deer 39 were sampled. Both B. major-positive sample d22 and one sample (d75) which was PCR positive specifically for Babesia sp. genotype EU1 were obtained from ticks from another red deer (red deer 48). Finally, all 16 ticks recovered from red deer 30 were analyzed by PCR individually or in pools (a total of 13 samples), which revealed the presence of B. divergens and B. major in one sample each, the presence of Babesia sp. genotype EU1 in two samples, and the presence of the novel Babesia sp. genotype CH1 in three samples. All sheep and goats in the Poschiavo Valley from which the Babesia-positive ticks were collected were on the same farm.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 3. Babesia spp. identified by PCR based on DNA isolated from ticks collected from domestic and wild ungulates from two locations

Control of the efficiency of DNA extraction.
A total of 74 DNA samples were tested with the primers for amplification of tick DNA to check DNA extraction. A fragment of the expected size (approximately 450 bp) was obtained from 60 samples. In most of the other 14 cases, DNA extraction was attempted using fully engorged females.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The unexpected identification of B. bigemina in Switzerland caused concern that this parasite from warmer regions of southern Europe had extended its range. However, this preliminary survey indicates that B. bigemina is probably not established in Switzerland as this parasite could not be detected in more than 2,000 ticks collected from domestic and wild ruminants in two regions in southern Switzerland (Poschiavo Valley and Ticino). These locations were chosen as study areas because of their warm climate (Ticino) and because a group of 31 animals, which had been added to the cattle herd that experienced the anaplasmosis outbreak in Chur shortly before the onset of the disease, originated from one of these places (Poschiavo Valley) and were suspected to have introduced the pathogens (8). Furthermore, of the ticks identified during this study, only H. punctata has been implicated as a vector for B. bigemina, but this was not confirmed in recent experiments (27). Finally, no clinical cases of babesiosis caused by a large Babesia sp. have been observed in Switzerland since the outbreak in the cattle herd in Chur occurred (unpublished data). Despite a thorough epidemiological investigation of this outbreak (8) and genetic characterizations of the B. bigemina isolate (Hilpertshauser et al., submitted), the origin and the manner of introduction of B. bigemina into Switzerland remain unclear.

The spectrum of ticks identified in this study (I. ricinus, D. marginatus, and H. punctata) was the expected spectrum as these species have been described in previous reports from these regions (3). In contrast, the diversity of Babesia spp. (B. divergens, B. major, Babesia sp. genotype EU1, new Babesia sp. genotype CH1) found in these ticks collected from domestic and wild ruminants was quite surprising. B. divergens is known to occur sporadically in the study area in cattle (7), and DNA of this parasite has recently been detected in 2 of 294 I. ricinus ticks examined from this region (9). Also, the presence of the zoonotic Babesia sp. genotype EU1, which was first identified in two splenectomized patients from Italy and Austria (17), was confirmed in 3 of the 294 ticks examined in that study (9). It has been suggested that I. ricinus is a vector for Babesia sp. genotype EU1 (13). This suggestion is strongly supported by our findings as we detected this parasite not just in this tick species but, importantly, in I. ricinus males, which do not feed, suggesting that there is transstadial transmission of Babesia sp. genotype EU1 in I. ricinus. PCR analysis of one H. punctata tick collected from wild ruminants, which have been identified as hosts of Babesia sp. genotype EU1 (13), also revealed the presence of this piroplasm genotype, but whether this tick species acts as a vector or whether Babesia sp. genotype EU1 was just taken up by the blood meal without further development in this tick remains to be elucidated. The suggested occurrence of B. major in Switzerland (7) was confirmed by molecular analysis by testing DNA extracted from I. ricinus, although H. punctata is considered a tick vector of B. major. The fourth babesial sequence, that of Babesia sp. genotype CH1, has not been described before, and this organism is closely related to B. odocoilei, which was isolated for the first time from a white-tailed deer in North America and which is transmitted by Ixodes scapularis (19, 20). It seems obvious that wild ruminants could act as hosts for the Babesia sp. genotype CH1 detected in ticks from Ticino.

Interestingly, more than one tick containing DNA of Babesia sp. was collected from four red deer, and all four Babesia species or genotypes identified in this study were found in the ticks from a single red deer (red deer 30). The role of wild ruminants as reservoir hosts of these Babesia spp. has to be investigated further. In previous surveys, small Babesia species have been detected in wild ruminants. A single report described the presence of a small Babesia sp. in Switzerland, as revealed by microscopic examination of blood smears of a chamois, and the parasite was considered a bovine piroplasm (6). In several European countries another Babesia sp. was found in game animals and named B. capreoli, which is morphologically and serologically similar to B. divergens (1, 5, 12, 14, 22). A very recently released 18S rRNA gene sequence of an isolate described as B. capreoli which was obtained from European roe deer (S. B. Slemanda, A. Chauvin, A. T. Camacho, L. Malandrin, M. L’Hostis, B. L. Herwaldt, and N. J. Pieniazek, unpublished data) (GenBank accession no. AY726009) indeed revealed that this species is not a separate species from B. divergens from cattle (Fig. 1).

In addition, B. divergens has been identified by molecular means in reindeer in Scotland (21) and in roe and red deer in Slovenia (13).

Taken together, these observations cast doubt on the postulated strict host specificity of bovine Babesia. Accordingly, a wide range of hosts has been reported for B. odocoilei (19), which has been detected in white-tailed deer, elk, zoo-reared caribou, and reindeer in North America.

Finally, wildlife, especially game animals, is important for maintenance of the tick population (23). Because of changes in land use and farming systems, more interaction between domestic and wild ruminants can be expected, resulting in spillover situations for parasite life cycles (23, 25).

 
We thank veterinarians H. Russi, R. Perl, P. Bonnemain, and D. Boillat and collaborators at the Clinique du Vieux-Château (Delémont, Jura, Switzerland) and at the veterinary offices for hunting and fisheries of Ticino and Grisons cantons for helping us collect ticks.

This project was supported by the Swiss Federal Veterinary Office in Berne.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Parasitology, Medical and Vetsuisse Faculty of the University of Zürich, Winterthurerstr. 266a, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland. Phone: 41 44 635 85 36. Fax: 41 44 635 89 07. E-mail: alexander.mathis{at}access.unizh.ch.

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1
1. Adam, K. M., D. A. Blewett, D. W. Brocklesby, and G. A. Sharman. 1976. The isolation and characterization of a Babesia from red deer (Cervus elaphus). Parasitology 73:1-11.[Medline]
2
2. Aeschlimann, A., P. A. Diehl, G. Eichenberger, R. Immler, and N. Weiss. 1968. Les tiques (Ixodoidea) des animaux domestiques au Tessin. Rev. Suisse Zool. 75:1039-1050.
3
3. Aeschlimann, A., and B. Papadopoulos. 1998. Einheimische und importierte Zecken der Schweiz. Swiss Vet. 12:21-24.
4
4. Black, W. C., and J. Piesman. 1994. Phylogeny of hard- and soft-tick taxa (Acari: Ixodida) based on mitochondrial 16S rDNA sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:10034-10038.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Blancou, J. 1983. Serologic testing of wild roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) from the Trois Fontaines forest region of eastern France. J. Wildl. Dis. 19:271-273.[Medline]
6
6. Bouvier, G. 1965. Observations sur les maladies du gibier et des animaux sauvages faites en 1963 et 1964. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilkd. 107:634-647.[Medline]
7
7. Brossard, M., and A. Aeschlimann. 1975. Piroplasmoses bovines en Suisse italienne. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilkd. 117:287-292.[Medline]
8
8. Brülisauer, F., R. Thoma, A. Cagienard, R. Hofmann-Lehmann, H. Lutz, M. L. Meli, G. Regula, K. Jorger, R. Perl, U. M. Dreher, U. Braun, and K. D. Stark. 2004. Anaplasmose in einem Milchviehbetrieb in Graubünden: Epidemiologische Ausbruchsuntersuchungen. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilkd. 146:451-459.[CrossRef][Medline]
9
9. Casati, S. 2005. Etude sur la diversité génétique des tiques Rhipicephalus sanguineus et Ixodes ricinus, et des agents pathogènes Rickettsia sp., Coxiella sp., Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Babesia sp. et le virus de l'encéphalite à tique en Suisse. Ph.D. thesis. University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
10
10. Corpet, F. 1988. Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:10881-10890.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11
11. Cotty, A. 1985. Clé de determination des Ixodidae et Amblyommidae de Suisse. Insitut de Zoologie, Université de Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
12
12. Dorrestein, G. M., F. Jongejan, and S. Rijpkema. 1996. Survey of tick related problems in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in The Netherlands. Vet. Q. 18:148.
13
13. Duh, D., M. Petrovec, A. Bidovec, and T. Avsic-Zupanc. 2005. Cervids as babesiae hosts, Slovenia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11:1121-1123.[Medline]
14
14. Enigk, K., and K. T. Friedhoff. 1962. Babesia capreoli n. sp. beim Reh (Capreolus capreolus L). Tropenmed. Parasitol. 13:8-20.
15
15. Friedhoff, K. T. 1988. Transmission of Babesia, p. 23-52. In M. Ristic (ed.). Babesiosis of domestic animals and man. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
16
16. Gern, L., M. Brossard, A. Aeschlimann, C.-A. Broquet, G. Quenet, J.-P. Stucki, and J. Ackermann. 1982. Piroplasmose bovine dans le Clos-du-Doubs (Jura, Suisse): observations préliminaires. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilkd. 124:549-556.[Medline]
17
17. Herwaldt, B. L., S. Caccio, F. Gherlinzoni, H. Aspock, S. B. Slemenda, P. Piccaluga, G. Martinelli, R. Edelhofer, U. Hollenstein, G. Poletti, S. Pampiglione, K. Loschenberger, S. Tura, and N. J. Pieniazek. 2003. Molecular characterization of a non-Babesia divergens organism causing zoonotic babesiosis in Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 9:942-948.[Medline]
18
18. Hofmann-Lehmann, R., M. L. Meli, U. M. Dreher, E. Gonczi, P. Deplazes, U. Braun, M. Engels, J. Schupbach, K. Jorger, R. Thoma, C. Griot, K. D. Stark, B. Willi, J. Schmidt, K. M. Kocan, and H. Lutz. 2004. Concurrent infections with vector-borne pathogens associated with fatal hemolytic anemia in a cattle herd in Switzerland. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:3775-3780.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19
19. Holman, P. J., K. G. Bendele, L. Schoelkopf, R. L. Jones-Witthuhn, and S. O. Jones. 2003. Ribosomal RNA analysis of Babesia odocoilei isolates from farmed reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) and elk (Cervus elaphus canadensis) in Wisconsin. Parasitol. Res. 91:378-383.[CrossRef][Medline]
20
20. Holman, P. J., J. Madeley, T. M. Craig, B. A. Allsopp, M. T. Allsopp, K. R. Petrini, S. D. Waghela, and G. G. Wagner. 2000. Antigenic, phenotypic and molecular characterization confirms Babesia odocoilei isolated from three cervids. J. Wildl. Dis. 36:518-530.[Abstract]
21
21. Langton, C., J. S. Gray, P. F. Waters, and P. J. Holman. 2003. Naturally acquired babesiosis in a reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) herd in Great Britain. Parasitol. Res. 89:194-198.[CrossRef][Medline]
22
22. Latif, B. M., and K. M. Adam. 1973. Antibody to Babesia in Scottish red deer (Cervus elaphus). Nature 241:476-477.[CrossRef][Medline]
23
23. L'Hostis, M., and H. Seegers. 2002. Tick-borne parasitic diseases in cattle: current knowledge and prospective risk analysis related to the ongoing evolution in French cattle farming systems. Vet. Res. 33:599-611.[CrossRef][Medline]
24
24. Longo, M. C., M. S. Berninger, and J. L. Hartley. 1990. Use of uracil DNA glycosylase to control carry-over contamination in polymerase chain reactions. Gene 93:125-128.[CrossRef][Medline]
25
25. Thompson, R. C. A. 2001. The future impact of societal and cultural factors on parasitic disease—some emerging issues. Int. J. Parasitol. 31:949-959.[CrossRef][Medline]
26
26. van de Peer, Y., and R. de Wachter. 1993. TREECON: a software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees. Comput. Applic. Biosci. 9:177-182.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27
27. Yin, H., W. Lu, J. Luo, Q. Zhang, and H. Dou. 1996. Experiments on the transmission of Babesia major and Babesia bigemina by Haemaphysalis punctata. Vet. Parasitol. 67:89-98.[CrossRef][Medline]

---

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2006, p. 6503-6507, Vol. 72, No. 10
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.00823-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Hoby, S., Mathis, A., Doherr, M. G., Robert, N., Ryser-Degiorgis, M.-P. (2009). BABESIA CAPREOLI INFECTIONS IN ALPINE CHAMOIS (RUPICAPRA R. RUPICAPRA), ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS C. CAPREOLUS) AND RED DEER (CERVUS ELAPHUS) FROM SWITZERLAND. J Wildl Dis 45: 748-763 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Blaschitz, M., Narodoslavsky-Gfoller, M., Kanzler, M., Stanek, G., Walochnik, J. (2008). Babesia Species Occurring in Austrian Ixodes ricinus Ticks. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 4841-4846 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hilpertshauser, H. Articles by Mathis, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hilpertshauser, H. Articles by Mathis, A. Agricola Articles by Hilpertshauser, H. Articles by Mathis, A.