Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2006, p. 1079-1085, Vol. 72, No. 2
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.72.2.1079-1085.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Molly C. Redmond,2 and
David L. Valentine3*
Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego,1 Graduate Program in Marine Science, University of California, Santa Barbara,2 Department of Earth Science and Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California3
Received 12 August 2005/ Accepted 8 November 2005
|
|
|---|
G) in response to changes in the concentrations of reactants and products, the purging rate, and the temperature. In each of these situations, H2 production changed such that
G remained nearly constant for each organism (11.1 ± 1.4 kJ mol butyrate1 for S. lipocalidus and 58.2 ± 1.0 kJ mol alanine1 for A. colombiense). The cellular maintenance energy, determined from the
G value and the hydrogen production rate at the point where the cell number was constant, was 4.6 x 1013 kJ cell1 day1 for S. lipocalidus at 55°C and 6.2 x 1013 kJ cell1 day1 for A. colombiense at 37°C. S. lipocalidus, in particular, seems adapted to thrive under conditions of low energy availability. |
|
|---|
Valentine et al. (29) designed a culture vessel that purges H2 as it is produced and then used this apparatus to grow an ethanol-oxidizing syntrophic organism in the absence of an H2-consuming partner. By decoupling the syntrophic association, it is possible to manipulate the single organism's growth environment, to quantify the concentrations of catabolic substrates and products, and to calculate the Gibbs free energy (
G) available to the fermentative organisms under these conditions. The
G of a reaction is dependent on both the temperature and the concentrations of the reactants and products, such that, for the reactions shown in Table 1,
G is defined by the following equations:
![]() | (1) |
![]() | (2) |
G°'(T) is the Gibbs free energy yield for the reaction under standard conditions, corrected for the entropy change caused by variation of the temperature (T
S); T is the temperature (kelvin); and R is the universal gas constant (0.008314 kJ K1 mol1). A more negative value indicates a more energetically favorable reaction. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Organisms and reactions studied, with their standard Gibbs free energy and entropy changes at pH 7 and a temperature of 298 K
|
G is maintained over time, despite changes in environmental conditions. This critical
G value should correspond to the minimum energy quantum that can be harnessed to support microbial metabolism. This has generally been considered to be equal to the amount of energy required for the synthesis of one-fourth to one-third a mole of ATP (
15 to 20 kJ mol1) (19), but a number of experimental (4, 6, 7, 10, 12, 21, 22) and theoretical (9, 14) studies point to microbial metabolism proceeding at
G values closer to thermodynamic equilibrium. In order to address these issues for pure cultures of H2-producing syntrophic organisms, we used the H2-purging culture vessel to study the energetics of butyrate and alanine consumption by pure cultures of Syntrophothermus lipocalidus and Aminobacterium colombiense (Table 1). We measured H2 production and calculated Gibbs free energy yields for various purging rates, concentrations of products and reactants, and temperatures. We also used cell counts to determine the cellular maintenance energy for each organism.
|
|
|---|
Cultures and growth conditions.
A pure culture of Syntrophothermus lipocalidus (24) was obtained from Yoichi Kamagata (National Institute of Bioscience and Human Technology, Agency of Industrial Science and Technology, Japan) and was grown on a medium containing the following reagents (per liter): 0.15 g KH2PO4, 0.5 g NH4Cl, 0.2 g MgCl2 · 6H2O, 0.15 g CaCl2 · 2H2O, 2.5 g NaOH, 0.3 g Na2S · 9H2O, 0.3 g cysteine HCl, 1 ml trace metal solution, and 1 ml vitamin solution. The trace metal solution contained the following reagents (per liter): 5.0 g sodium EDTA dihydrate, 1.5 g CoCl2 · 6H2O, 1.0 g MnCl2 · 4H2O, 1.0 g FeSO4 · 9H2O, 1.0 g ZnCl2, 0.4 g AlCl3 · 6H2O, 0.3 g Na2WO4 · 2H2O, 0.2 g CuCl2, 0.2 g NiSO4 · 6H2O, 0.1 g H2SeO3, 0.1 g H3BO3, and 0.1 g Na2MoO4 · 2H2O. The vitamin solution contained the following reagents (per liter): 2.0 mg biotin, 2.0 mg folic acid, 10.0 mg pyridoxine HCl, 5.0 mg thiamine HCl, 5.0 mg riboflavin, 5.0 mg calcium panthothenate, 0.1 mg vitamin B12, 5.0 mg p-aminobenzoate, and 5.0 mg lipoic acid. The pH was adjusted to 6.2.
For initial growth, the medium was supplemented with crotonate to a concentration of 10 mM, and 10 ml was inoculated with 1 ml of the S. lipocalidus stock culture. After dense growth was observed, 5 ml of the resulting culture was used to inoculate 141 ml of the original medium, amended with butyrate to a concentration of 15.5 mM. The medium had been sparged in the H2-purging culture vessel prior to inoculation. The culture was grown at 55°C, and the flow rate of the N2-CO2 gas mixture was 20 cm3 min1 (all flow rates were normalized to standard temperature and pressure). Butyrate was assumed to be the sole substrate supporting growth, as other organic amendments, namely, cysteine, do not support growth of this organism (24).
Aminobacterium colombiense (1) was obtained from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (DSM 12261). The medium for A. colombiense contained the following reagents (per liter): 0.3 g KH2PO4, 0.3 g NH4Cl, 0.4 g MgCl2 · 6H2O, 0.15 g CaCl2 · 2H2O, 0.5 g KCl, 1.00 g NaCl, 0.3 g Na2S · 9H2O, 0.3 g cysteine-HCl, 143 mg yeast extract, and 1 ml each of the trace element and vitamin solutions described above. The pH was adjusted to 7.3.
This medium was amended with 10 mM serine for the initial growth of A. colombiense. After dense growth was observed, 3 ml was used to inoculate 300 ml of the medium described above, amended with alanine to a concentration of 10 mM. The culture was grown at 37°C, and the gas flow rate was 20 cm3 min1. Alanine was assumed to be the primary substrate for growth of this organism, as amendments of additional organic compounds, namely, yeast extract and cysteine, were added at substantially lower concentrations than alanine. This assumption was supported by the observed fermentation balance, with 2.4 mmol alanine yielding 2.0 mmol acetate and 5.3 mmol H2. Yeast extract does not support the growth of A. colombiense, but cysteine has been shown to serve as a growth substrate for this strain (1). The simultaneous oxidation of cysteine (present at a concentration of 1.9 mM) and alanine (10 mM) would cause a slight underestimation in the calculated cell-specific maintenance energy, although the calculated values of
G for alanine consumption would remain unchanged.
Experimental manipulations.
S. lipocalidus was used to determine the influence of the sparging gas flow rate on the production of H2. The gas flow rate was set, and the response was monitored and recorded over 10-min intervals until a new steady-state PH2 was reached. The flow rates used were 5, 10, 20, and 40 cm3 min1.
The effect of excess acetate (catabolic end product) on H2 production was also investigated with S. lipocalidus. Small volumes of sterile, anoxic acetate (1.5 ml, 1.0 M) were added to the culture vessel, and the H2 concentration was recorded at 10-min intervals. Once a steady state was reached, a 3-ml liquid sample was taken from the vessel for analysis of the pH as well as the acetate and butyrate concentrations.
Experiments were also performed to determine the effect of temperature on PH2 in both S. lipocalidus and A. colombiense cultures. The incubation temperature was changed, and the concentration of H2 flowing from the vessel was measured at 5-min intervals until a steady state was reached. The temperatures ranged between 45°C and 62.5°C for S. lipocalidus and between 20°C and 42°C for A. colombiense and were all within the known growth range for each organism (1, 24).
Sampling and analytical methods.
Throughout the course of the experiments, 8-ml liquid samples were removed from the culture vessels to measure the pH, substrate and product concentrations, and bacterial cell density. Five milliliters of each sample was used for organic acid analysis. These samples were filtered through 0.2-µm filters and stored frozen at 20°C. Samples were analyzed within 2 months of collection. Two-milliliter samples were used for bacterial cell counts.
Organic acid concentrations (acetate and butyrate) were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (LC-600; Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan), using an organic acid column (IOA-1000; Alltech) and a UV/VIS detector (SPD-6AV; Shimadzu Corp., Kyoto, Japan) at 210 nm (0.5 mM H2SO4 mobile phase, 0.6 ml min1, 200-µl sample loop). Standards at known concentrations were analyzed in duplicate to calibrate the instrument. Alanine was quantified by an enzymatic assay using alanine aminotransferase and lactate dehydrogenase (32). The concentration of H2 in the gas flowing out of the reaction vessel was measured using a gas chromatograph equipped with a reducing gas analyzer (Trace Analytical, Menlo Park, CA), as described by Valentine et al. (29). Bacterial cell counts were determined by DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining (18).
Thermodynamic calculations.
The
G°' value for each reaction was calculated by using the standard Gibbs free energies of formation for products and reactants shown in Table 2 and then corrected for temperature by using the following equation:
G°'(T) =
G°'
S(T 298). The
S value for each reaction was determined by using the standard entropy values shown in Table 2.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Standard Gibbs free energy and entropy values
|
G values over the course of the experiments were calculated using measured values for PH2 and the concentrations of acetate, butyrate, and alanine (interpolated when necessary). Ammonium concentrations were calculated based on the initial concentration in the medium and were assumed to increase in stoichiometric proportion to hydrogen production in the case of A. colombiense. PCO2 was assumed to remain constant at 0.2 atm. pH measurements were used to determine the proton concentration and to correct for the effect of nonstandard pH conditions on
G (5.69 kJ mol1 per pH unit). |
|
|---|
G at a nearly constant value for the remainder of each experiment (Fig. 1E and F). During that time, the mean
G (±standard deviation) was 10.3 ± 1.1 kJ mol butyrate1 (n = 8) for S. lipocalidus and 57.2 ± 1.1 kJ mol acetate1 (n = 4) for A. colombiense.
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Catabolism and bioenergetics of S. lipocalidus and A. colombiense. (A) Consumption of butyrate (open circles) and production of acetate (filled circles) in S. lipocalidus. (B) Consumption of alanine (open triangles) and production of acetate (filled triangles) in A. colombiense. (C and D) Time course changes of hydrogen partial pressure. (E and F) G values calculated for measured concentrations of products and reactants.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Cell-specific bioenergetics
|
Purging rate.
Increasing the flow of the gas purging the culture vessel increases the removal rate of H2. If the rate of hydrogen production does not change and if gas exchange is 100% efficient, doubling the purging rate would be expected to decrease the PH2 by half, which would then change the
G of the reaction. In order to maintain a constant
G, the H2 production rate would have to double as well, thereby keeping PH2 constant. In S. lipocalidus cultures, the PH2 changed in response to variations in the purging rate (Fig. 2A), but it changed less than would be predicted if the hydrogen production rate had remained constant at its initial value (predicted PH2 values are shown by dotted lines in Fig. 2A). At a purging rate of 5 cm3 min1, the change was just 28% of what was predicted, and it was 34% of the predicted change at 10 cm3 min1 and 68% of the predicted change at 40 cm3 min1. This was possibly related to the efficiency of H2 transfer from aqueous to gas phase.
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Effect of purging gas flow rate on S. lipocalidus. (A) PH2 over the course of the experiment. Vertical dashed lines indicate the times the purging rate was changed, with the rates given in cm3 min1. Horizontal dotted lines represent the PH2 expected if the H2 production rate remained constant at its initial value while the purging rate was changed from 20 cm3 min1. (B) H2 production rate after stabilization at each purging rate. (C) Response of G, calculated for steady-state PH2 at each purging rate. The dashed line indicates the G values expected if the H2 production rate had remained constant at its initial value at the 20 cm3 min1 purging rate.
|
G values varied between 9.1 and 14.6 kJ mol1, becoming more negative as the purging rate increased (Fig. 2C). This range is smaller than what would be predicted from the PH2 values that would result if the hydrogen production rate had remained constant at its initial value (dashed line in Fig. 2C), with the greatest deviation at the lowest purging rate, 5 cm3 min1.
End product addition.
The accumulation of catabolic end products causes the
G of a reaction to become less energetically favorable. Therefore, in the absence of any other changes to the system, adding acetate, one of the end products of butyrate fermentation in S. lipocalidus, would be expected to cause an increase in
G. However, acetate additions caused the partial pressure of H2, the other end product, to decrease (Fig. 3A). This decrease in PH2 more than compensated for the change in
G attributed to increased acetate, causing
G to decrease slightly, from 10.1 to 12.9 kJ mol1 (Fig. 3B).
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Effect of acetate concentration on S. lipocalidus. (A) Response of PH2 to acetate. Dashed lines indicate times of acetate additions, and measured concentrations (mM) are noted. (B) Response of G, calculated for the steady-state PH2, at each acetate concentration. The dashed line indicates the G values that would be expected if PH2 had remained constant while acetate was added.
|
G both through its effect on entropy (T
S) and through its effect on the RT(ln Q) term. For both reactions in Table 1, this leads to a more negative
G at higher temperatures in the absence of other changes. In both S. lipocalidus and A. colombiense cultures, the PH2 increased in response to temperature increases and decreased in response to decreases (Fig. 4A and C). These changes in PH2 were sufficient to balance the opposing effects of temperature variation, and
G remained constant throughout the course of the experiment (Fig. 4B and D). The mean
G value was 11.3 ± 0.6 kJ mol1 (n = 5) for S. lipocalidus and 58.6 ± 0.7 kJ mol1 (n = 11) for A. colombiense.
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Effect of temperature on PH2 of S. lipocalidus (A) and A. colombiense (C). Dashed lines indicate times of temperature changes, and the temperatures (°C) are noted. (B and D) Responses of G, calculated for the steady-state PH2 at each temperature, for S. lipocalidus (B) and A. colombiense (D). Dashed lines indicate the G values that would be expected if the concentrations of products and reactants had remained at their initial values while the temperature changed.
|
|
|
|---|
G. In the case of the purging rate experiment, hydrogen production increased with increasing purging rates but apparently could not "keep up" with the increased removal rates. This may have been partially due to inefficient H2 transport between the culture medium and the purging gas at higher flow rates or because the culture lacked a sufficient number of cells to sustain the higher rates of hydrogen production. The concentration of H2 is measured in the purging gas exiting the culture vessel, but this will necessarily be lower than the concentration at the H2-producing cell (2). This leads to a slight underestimation of PH2, and consequently, the energy available is actually somewhat lower than that calculated (
G is less negative). With more rapidly flowing gas, bubbles become larger, possibly causing a kinetic limitation.
With the exception of the purging rate experiment, the critical
G value for each species remained fairly constant between experiments, but the values for S. lipocalidus and A. colombiense were distinct. For S. lipocalidus, the energy yields ranged between 8.8 and 12.8 kJ mol butyrate1, well below the 20 kJ mol1 that has generally been considered the theoretical minimum. This theoretical minimum was based on several assumptions considered by Schink (19) and Hoehler et al. (10), as follows. (i) The ATP/ADP ratio inside the cell is 10:1. The
G value required for phosphorylation of ADP would then be 49 kJ mol1. (ii) Cellular metabolism is not 100% efficient. Including energy lost as heat, ATP formation must require at least 60 kJ mol1. (iii) The translocation of three cations is required for the synthesis of one ATP molecule. The energy required for translocation of one ion is equal to the minimum quantum of biologically useful energy.
However, there are a number of reported observations of organisms capable of metabolism at
G values below this theoretical minimum (4, 6, 7, 10, 12, 21, 22; this study). Although some of these very low values may have been observed in cells not actually growing and synthesizing ATP, it is clear that one or more of these assumptions does not hold true for organisms adapted to a low-energy lifestyle. It has been suggested that organisms may vary the number of protons translocated to produce ATP (14), and recent results showed that in some organisms the translocation of four, or even five, ions may be coupled to produce one ATP (13, 26, 30). This would bring the minimum Gibbs free energy requirement down to 12 or 15 kJ mol1 (20), though this is still higher than the values reported in most of the studies referenced above.
Maintenance energy.
Maintenance energy can be considered the rate of energy consumption necessary to simply maintain cellular integrity (9). Tijhuis et al. (28) calculated maintenance energy requirements for microorganisms, both heterotrophic and autotrophic, under aerobic and anaerobic conditions over a large temperature range (5°C to 75°C). They determined that the maintenance energy (mE), in kJ per hour per mole of biomass carbon, is primarily a function of temperature, related in anaerobic prokaryotes by the following equation:
![]() | (3) |
Early in the experiment, when the cell number was increasing, the energy yield reflected both the maintenance energy and the energy needed for growth. Near the end of the experiment, when the cell number was decreasing, the energy yield may have been less than the amount required for maintenance. Between these points, when cell numbers were fairly constant, the energy yield was taken as a reasonable approximation of the cellular maintenance energy. The limited amount of data made it difficult to determine exactly where the cell numbers peaked; the peak appeared to lag slightly behind hydrogen production. For S. lipocalidus, the best estimate of maintenance energy was at 270 h, with a value of 2.3 kJ h1 mol C1. For A. colombiense, cell numbers remained fairly constant between 162 h and 213 h, and the energy yields at these points were 3.4 and 2.8 kJ h1 mol C1.
For both organisms, the observed values were lower than the theoretical maintenance energies at these temperatures. For A. colombiense, some of this discrepancy may be due to the simultaneous consumption of cysteine. However, this discrepancy was greater for S. lipocalidus, which had a maintenance energy more than an order of magnitude below the value predicted by Tijhuis et al. (28) (2.3 versus 42.7 kJ h1 mol C1). Despite the uncertainties in our calculations, these results support the findings of Scholten and Conrad (21), who determined mE values for the syntrophic consumption of propionate in a chemostat and also used data in the literature to calculate mE values for the consumption of ethanol by both syntrophic organisms and pure cultures. In nearly every case, the value of mE was lower than the value predicted by the equation of Tijhuis et al. (28), by up to an order of magnitude. It appears that maintenance energies for syntrophic organisms may be significantly lower than those for other bacteria, perhaps because they are adapted to conditions of perpetual energy stress.
Funding for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation through a postdoctoral fellowship in microbial biology (DBI-0074368), the Life in Extreme Environments special competition (OCE-0085607), and the Biogeosciences Program (EAR-0311894).
Present address: Invitrogen Corporation, 1600 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»