Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2006, p. 1558-1568, Vol. 72, No. 2
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.72.2.1558-1568.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
J. E. Butler,2
A. Esteve-Nuñez,2
M. V. Coppi,2
B. O. Palsson,1
C. H. Schilling,1 and
D. R. Lovley2
Genomatica, San Diego, California 92121,1 Department of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 010032
Received 5 August 2005/ Accepted 2 November 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The metabolism of Geobacter species has not been studied in detail. It is clear that their metabolism differs from the anaerobic metabolism of several well-studied organisms, such as Escherichia coli, that rely primarily on sugar fermentation to produce energy and biosynthetic precursors. In Geobacter, acetate and other electron donors are completely oxidized via the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle (14, 34), necessitating electron transfer to terminal electron acceptors for the regeneration of cytoplasmic and intramembrane electron acceptors and ATP synthesis. Furthermore, the need to transfer electrons to extracellular electron acceptors, such as Fe(III) oxides, poses biochemical challenges not faced during microbial reduction of soluble electron acceptors that can be reduced within the cell (58, 80).
The complete genome of Geobacter sulfurreducens was recently sequenced, providing insights into the physiological properties of Geobacter species (54, 62), including the elucidation of novel adaptive strategies such as Fe(II)-based chemotaxis (15) and the previously unsuspected ability to respire oxygen (48). However, it is not possible to predict the physiology of G. sulfurreducens from the annotated sequence alone.
The constraint-based approach to modeling microbial metabolism, which does not require detailed kinetic parameters for individual metabolic reactions, has proven to be an effective strategy for predicting the physiological responses of microorganisms (44, 77, 87). This approach relies on implementing a series of physicochemical constraints, including thermodynamic directionality, and enzymatic capacity constraints and reaction stoichiometry constraints arising from the requirement that fluxes consuming and producing both metabolites and protons are balanced. To date, this method has been primarily applied to well-studied microorganisms and pathogens such as E. coli (26, 27, 79), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (24, 30), Haemophilus influenzae (25), and Helicobacter pylori (82).
Here we describe the application of the constraint-based modeling approach, coupled in an iterative fashion with experimental studies, to further elucidate the physiology of G. sulfurreducens. The results demonstrate that this approach can accelerate discovery as well as provide insights into the ecology of Geobacter species, by enabling the exploration of metabolic responses to a variety of genetic and environmental perturbations, thereby generating testable hypotheses.
|
|
|---|
The SimPheny (Genomatica, San Diego, CA) platform was used to create and curate the current reconstruction. All of the reactions incorporated into the network were elementally and charge balanced and included information on the localization (cytoplasmic or extracellular) of the reactants and products. Charges on all metabolites were calculated assuming a physiological pH (intracellular) of 7.4 by using Pipeline Pilot (Scitegic, San Diego, CA).
Strain and culture conditions.
Wild-type G. sulfurreducens (ATCC 51573) and the FrdA-knockout strain (11) were obtained from our laboratory collection. G. sulfurreducens was grown in batch and continuous culture in two defined, bicarbonate-buffered mineral media, i.e., freshwater acetate-fumarate medium (5.5 mM:30 mM) and acetate-Fe(III) citrate medium (5.5 mM:55 mM), under strict anaerobic conditions at 30°C using previously described methods (28, 29). Cell growth was monitored by determining total protein by the bicinchoninic acid method with bovine serum albumin as a standard (85), and organic acid production was monitored by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as previously described (28).
Determination of biomass composition.
Cultures for biomass composition determinations were grown in acetate-fumarate medium, harvested in exponential phase (µ
0.1 h1) when cultures were at half-maximal optical density, and resuspended in deionized water. Dry weight was determined gravimetrically after drying at 105°C for 24 h. Lipids (32), DNA, and RNA were analyzed as previously described (39, 83). The carbohydrate weight fraction was estimated by the anthrone method, with glucose as a standard (4). The weight fractions of the various macromolecules were calculated to be as follows: protein (46%), RNA (10%), DNA (4%), lipids (15%), and total carbohydrate (15%). The remainder of the biomass was assumed to consist of lipopolysaccharides (4%), peptidoglycan (4%), and ions (2%). The distribution of the amino acids, nucleotides, lipopolysaccharides, and ions in the biomass was assumed to be similar to that of E. coli (64, 65). The detailed lipid composition was assumed to be similar to that of G. metallireducens (57).
The biomass composition described above was used to create a reaction in the network reconstruction that represented growth-associated biosynthetic demands and was used in all simulations (reaction name agg_GS13m [see Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material]). This reaction includes energetic requirements, as well as cytoplasmic proton generation associated with the formation of peptide bonds and other biomass components.
In silico analysis of metabolism.
A genome-scale metabolic model for G. sulfurreducens was developed by using the constraint-based modeling approach (7, 44, 87) and the SimPheny (Genomatica, San Diego, CA) platform. For growth simulations, the objective of maximization was the production of biomass. Some combinations of transport reactions in the metabolic model could exchange protons across the membrane, effectively constituting a proton pump without energetic requirements. Such violations of thermodynamic considerations were prevented by constraining the corresponding reactions such that they were consistent with electrochemical and ion gradients commonly known to exist in bacteria (5, 76). The complete list of genes, reactions, metabolites, applied constraints, and confidence scores is available online (http://www.geobacter.org/) and in Table S1 in the supplemental material.
The stoichiometry associated with the list of metabolic reactions, along with the directionality constraints, and the substrate uptake rates corresponding to the environmental variables (media conditions) were used to define the constraints on the fluxes (reaction rates) based on the assumption that fluxes producing and consuming a metabolite are balanced at steady state. These constraints define the solution boundary in the metabolic flux space, and a single metabolic flux distribution that maximized a "cellular objective" was calculated through linear optimization. The linear programming problem was solved in SimPheny using the revised Simplex solver from Lindo (Lindo Systems, Inc., Chicago, IL). The initial point for the Simplex algorithm was not explicitly specified in the formulation and was assumed to be the default value determined by the algorithm. This algorithm identifies a single point that is optimal even though there can be multiple points (i.e., an edge) that are optimal. For details, the interested reader is referred to the cited book by Chvatal (16). It has been established that these alternate optimal solutions have the same objective value (i.e., growth rate when it is selected for maximization) but different metabolic flux distributions due to redundancies in the metabolic pathways (46, 61). Typically, only one of the alternate optimal solutions, in which a specific redundant pathway is active, is identified by the linear programming algorithm. In addition, there are reactions ("blocked reactions") in incomplete pathways that are never predicted to be active under any condition and conditionally active reactions that are active only under specific environments. The details on the computation and the interpretation of these blocked reactions and redundant pathways are presented elsewhere (10, 61).
For all simulations presented here, all genes included in the network were assumed to be expressed and their associated reactions were assumed to be functional. Maximization of biomass production (growth) was the objective for all of the simulations except for the comparison of amino acid synthesis capabilities. In silico deletion analysis was performed by eliminating specific genes and their associated reactions from the model. For analysis of the energetics of menaquinone secretion, an additional menaquinone secretion rate constraint was incorporated.
|
|
|---|
Identification and closure of network gaps.
The initial database was used to construct a preliminary metabolic model for G. sulfurreducens, and simulations were performed to determine whether this collection of independent reactions could synthesize a full complement of DNA, RNA, amino acids, lipids, carbohydrates, and cofactors from acetate and a defined mineral medium containing vitamins (29). These simulations revealed gaps in the network that required additional evaluation. For example, G. sulfurreducens is typically cultured with ammonia as the sole nitrogen source, and yet the network was unable to synthesize lysine, serine, alanine, and threonine. Synthesis of lysine by the network necessitated the incorporation of two non-gene-associated reactions (tetrahydropicolinate succinylase and succinyl-diaminopimelate desuccinylase) to allow production of the key metabolite meso-2,6-diaminopimelate from 2,3,4,5-tetrahydrodipicolinate.
In order to close gaps detected in the network and enable synthesis of all growth precursors, a total of 55 non-gene-associated reactions were added. These included reactions to complete menaquinone and fatty acid biosynthesis and allow exchange of diffusible metabolites and gases (e.g., diffusion of H2, N2, and CO2), as well as those required for amino acid biosynthesis. A list of these non-gene-associated reactions is presented in Table S3 in the supplemental material. However, even after the addition of these reactions, there were network gaps in poorly characterized biochemical pathways. Reactions in such pathways (denoted as blocked reactions) were predicted to be inactive in all model simulations even though they were incorporated into the model (10).
Previous analysis of the G. sulfurreducens genome suggested the potential for ammonia oxidation and autotrophic growth on one-carbon compounds (62). However, the pathways for these two types of metabolism appeared to be incomplete. Furthermore, there is no physiological evidence that G. sulfurreducens can grow with NH4 as an electron donor or grow in the absence of an additional carbon source if either formate or H2 is provided as the electron donor (12). Therefore, reactions that would lead to completion of the pathways for autotrophic growth and ammonia oxidation were not incorporated into the model.
The completed reconstructed metabolic network of G. sulfurreducens contained 588 genes (or 17% of a total of 3,467 ORFs), 522 biochemical reactions, and 541 unique metabolites. A full list of all gene-associated reactions is provided in Table S1 in the supplemental material.
Evaluation of the proton translocation stoichiometry during fumarate reduction.
Once a network capable of synthesizing biomass in minimal medium under standard conditions was constructed, unique aspects of Geobacter energy metabolism and physiology were integrated. The reactions in the model included explicit details of proton production and the movement of protons between the cytoplasmic and extracellular compartments. Hence, the model provided a unique platform for evaluating mechanisms of energy generation. This characteristic was especially advantageous for studying Geobacter species, which are completely dependent upon electrogenic electron transport for ATP production and cannot generate ATP from acetate via substrate-level phosphorylation (58).
Fumarate reduction was selected as the first energy generation mode to be examined with the metabolic model. Extensive literature is available regarding microbial fumarate respiration, and fumarate, in contrast to extracellular electron acceptors typically exploited by Geobacter species, is an intracellular electron acceptor involving a relatively simple electron transport chain (18). In addition, experimental observations of growth in the presence of fumarate indicate that G. sulfurreducens can neither oxidize fumarate nor utilize fumarate as a carbon or energy source, even when grown in the presence of noncarbon electron donors such as hydrogen (12, 19, 29, 34).
Genetic studies indicate that G. sulfurreducens utilizes a single, three-subunit membrane-bound complex (FrdABC) with a cytoplasmic active site for both the reduction of fumarate and the oxidation of succinate (11). The bifunctional fumarate reductase/succinate dehydrogenase of G. sulfurreducens is homologous to the characterized, di-heme, menaquinone-reducing succinate dehydrogenase of Bacillus subtilis and the menaquinone-oxidizing fumarate reductases of Wolinella succinogenes and belongs to heterotrimeric B-type family of fumarate reductases and succinate dehydrogenases (11, 38). During fumarate reduction by G. sulfurreducens, the succinate dehydrogenase is not required for fumarate production, since fumarate is present in the media and the TCA cycle operates as an "open loop" (11, 34). Therefore, only six electrons, in the form of NADH, NADPH, and ferredoxin, are derived from oxidation of acetate during fumarate reduction with the fumarate reductase serving as the terminal electron accepting step.
In the metabolic model, all reducing equivalents derived from the TCA cycle were assumed to be interconverted to NADH and enter the menaquinone pool via the two 14-subunit type I NADH dehydrogenase complexes that are encoded in the G. sulfurreducens genome (62). Type I NADH dehydrogenases typically translocate at least two charge equivalents per NADH oxidized and catalyze the consumption of two cytoplasmic protons during menaquinone reduction (33, 89). Whether menaquinol oxidation results in electrogenic translocation at the fumarate reductase was less clear. The succinate dehydrogenase of B. subtilis has been suggested to be electrogenic (84). However, more recent biochemical evidence indicates that the fumarate reductases of W. succinogenes, Rhodothermus marinus, and B. subtilis are not electrogenic (6, 31, 36, 45). Thus, three possible mechanisms for generating energy during growth with fumarate were examined: translocation at both the NADH dehydrogenase and the fumarate reductase, translocation at the NADH dehydrogenase alone, and translocation only by fumarate reductase. Simulations were performed assuming an H+/ATP ratio of 4.
Only one of these scenarios, in which proton translocation occurred at the NADH dehydrogenase alone, was consistent with both thermodynamic considerations and available experimental data. The lower boundary for the
G' of acetate oxidation coupled to fumarate reduction was calculated to be approximately 186 kJ/mol acetate, based on the steady-state concentrations of substrates and products present in the medium during acetate-limited growth in chemostats (µ
0.05 h1) (29). Given a
G' for ATP synthesis of 60 kJ/mol (47), a maximum of 3 mol of ATP synthesized/mol of acetate oxidized was estimated. If the NADH dehydrogenase was considered to be the sole electrogenic site, then the maximum electron transport stoichiometry was 2H+/2e, where ne is the number of electrons, and a total of 1.5 mol of ATP could be generated per mol of acetate, a value well within the thermodynamic boundary of 3 mol of ATP per mol of acetate established above. If both NADH dehydrogenase and fumarate reductase were electrogenic, the electron transport stoichiometry increased to 4H+/2e, resulting in 3 mol of ATP/mol of acetate, which was at the thermodynamic boundary, and hence unlikely to occur in vivo. Translocation at the fumarate reductase alone was excluded based on the observation that growth yields per mole of succinate produced were similar during growth with acetate and that with hydrogen (19). If the fumarate reductase operated as an electrogenic redox loop, hydrogen oxidation would result in translocation of 4H+/2e versus 2H+/2e for acetate oxidation, which would manifest as a significantly higher growth yield per electron.
Evaluation of the proton translocation stoichiometry during Fe(III) reduction.
Analysis of the in silico growth of G. sulfurreducens under Fe(III)-reducing conditions uncovered an important energetic dilemma facing Fe(III)-reducing bacteria. To adapt the model of fumarate reduction to Fe(III) reduction, Fe(III) reduction was first modeled as a reaction that occurred outside the cell, consistent with numerous experimental observations (18) and the fact that insoluble Fe(III) oxides are the predominant form of Fe(III) in most soils and sediments (53). Under Fe(III)-reducing conditions, the TCA cycle operated as a closed loop (34) and produced eight electrons per mole of acetate oxidized. Menaquinone reduction was considered to occur as a consequence of a nonelectrogenic succinate dehydrogenase and a proton-pumping NADH dehydrogenase as described for fumarate reduction, resulting in the translocation of six H+ per acetate oxidized. However, model simulations using this electron transport scheme indicated that cells would not be capable of growth (in silico) under Fe(III)-reducing conditions.
The inability of a single 2H+/2e NADH dehydrogenase coupling site to support simulated Fe(III)-dependent growth was traced to the fact that the site of Fe(III) reduction was extracellular. The eight cytoplasmic protons that were produced from each mole of acetate oxidized in the cytoplasm were consumed in the cytoplasm when fumarate was the electron acceptor. In contrast, during Fe(III) reduction, electrons were transported outside the cell, while leaving protons in the cytoplasm, effectively dissipating the membrane potential and acidifying the cytoplasm. In order to generate sufficient energy to compensate for the production of protons in the cytoplasm, an additional coupling step was required.
The most likely mechanism for additional membrane potential generation during Fe(III) reduction was during transfer of electrons into the periplasmic cytochrome pool. Based on the fact that cytochromes implicated in Fe(III) reduction have midpoint potentials in the range of 190 mV (omcB) (60) and 136 to 155 mV (ppcA) (50), the energy available for coupling at this site could support translocation of 1H+/2e. This reaction was modeled as the release of menaquinol protons back to the cytoplasm by a protein capable of translocating 1 H+ per pair of electrons transferred to the cytochrome pool. Inclusion of this reaction and accounting for all of the protons produced and consumed during metabolism resulted in a theoretical maximum yield with Fe(III) as the electron acceptor of 0.5 mol of ATP/mol of acetate compared to the 1.5 mol of ATP/mol of acetate during fumarate reduction. This output of the model provides an explanation for the experimental finding that growth yields of G. sulfurreducens are
3-fold higher when fumarate serves as the terminal electron acceptor than during growth with Fe(III)-citrate (29). This experimental result was initially surprising because it is not consistent with expectations based on available energy, since the mid-point potential of the fumarate-succinate redox couple (at pH 7) is 0.03 V, whereas that of the Fe(III)-citrate/Fe(II) couple is 0.37 V.
These results suggest that reducing extracellular electron acceptors such as Fe(III) oxides, Fe(III)-citrate, elemental sulfur (S°), or electrodes will result in the generation of less biomass per electron transferred than growth with intracellularly reduced electron acceptors. This may be an important consideration for applications such as bioremediation and electricity harvesting from waste organic matter, in which electron transfer to metals or electrodes, rather than production of biomass, is the primary goal.
Incorporation of physiological parameters.
Once the proton translocation stoichiometry was determined, the next step in the development of the model was incorporation of physiological parameters, namely, the biomass component demands and maintenance energy requirements. First, a reaction representing growth-associated biosynthetic demands was constructed based on measurements of G. sulfurreducens biomass composition (see Materials and Methods). This reaction takes into account the amounts of 58 metabolites, cofactors, precursors, and ions required to synthesize each gram (dry weight) (gdw) of biomass, as well as proton consumption for reductive reactions, and the calculated ATP costs for the polymerization (peptide bond formation, DNA replication, and RNA polymerization) and biosynthesis of precursors and metabolites (see Table S2 in the supplemental material).
The ATP demand due to non-growth-associated energy functions, such as maintenance of ion gradients, turnover of RNA, and regulatory metabolism, was estimated by plotting acetate consumption during acetate-limited growth in chemostats with fumarate serving as the electron acceptor versus growth rate, extrapolating acetate consumption at a growth rate of zero (66, 73), and calculating the amount of ATP that would be produced from oxidation of this amount of acetate. This flux (ATPM: 0.45 mmol of ATP/gdw/h) was then used in conjunction with the biomass demand equation to predict the in silico growth yield of G. sulfurreducens over a range of growth rates. Comparison of these predictions with chemostat-derived growth yields (29) indicated that an additional flux of 46.7 mmol of ATP/gdw was consumed for growth-associated energy demands. This value was included as part of the biomass synthesis equation for all further growth simulations.
Evaluating model robustness.
The metabolic reaction network, combined with demand reactions for biomass synthesis, correctly predicted growth yields and acetate consumption rates for growth in standard acetate-limited chemostats (µ = 0.06 h1) with Fe(III)-citrate or fumarate as the electron acceptor (Fig. 1). Perturbations in variables used to construct the model, such as the biomass composition, which was derived from batch cultures of fumarate grown cells, had minimal effect on predicted growth yields for G. sulfurreducens. For instance, when a range of biomass composition equations (e.g., reflecting a range from 0.4 to 0.55 g of protein/gdw) were incorporated into the model, predicted yields were not significantly affected (1.5 to 2.5% differences). By comparison, a change in electron acceptor from fumarate to Fe(III) citrate caused threefold differences in yield or respiration rates (29). This revealed that the model predictions were robust to changes in biomass composition and nutrient availability, which was consistent with other work showing that variations in biomass composition produce only subtle effects on predicted growth yields or fluxes through central metabolic pathways (23, 74, 75). Hence, it is possible to assume that even significant changes (10 to 20%) in biomass composition would not affect the nature of metabolic predictions.
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Comparison of the biomass yields predicted by the in silico model with experimental data (29) derived from growth in chemostats under acetate-limiting conditions (5.5 mM acetate and 30 mM fumarate) at a rate of 0.06 h1. Model simulations of acetate-limited growth were carried out by constraining the growth rate at 0.06 h1 and minimizing the acetate uptake rate. Variability in model predictions due to changes in biomass composition was estimated to be less than 5%.
|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Predicted flux distribution through central metabolism in G. sulfurreducens during in silico growth with limiting acetate and excess Fe(III)-citrate (growth rate of 0.06 h1). Red arrows indicate reactions with the greatest flux, and blue arrows indicate reactions with the least flux. Black lines indicate pathways with no associated flux. Flux predictions (in mmol/gdw/h) are listed below enzyme names.
|
Activation of acetate via acetyl-CoA transferase only provided acetyl-CoA at a rate equal to the flux through the TCA cycle due to the dual role of the transferase in completing the TCA cycle (succinate to succinyl-CoA) and activating acetate. Thus, flux through an additional acetate activation pathway (acetate kinase [0.94 mmol/gdw/h]) was required to provide sufficient acetyl-CoA for pyruvate synthesis to meet gluconeogenic and anapleurotic demands. The major demand for pyruvate (54%) in G. sulfurreducens was predicted to be PEP synthesis for gluconeogenic reactions. Activation of pyruvate to PEP consumed 5.1% of the ATP flux in the cell, a value that doubled if the cost of activating acetate to acetyl-phosphate was considered. These distributions indicated that the availability of exogenous compounds with three or more carbons would eliminate this significant acetate and ATP demand and demonstrated the metabolic specializations which enable G. sulfurreducens to use acetate as both a carbon source and electron donor.
Although a complete pathway for glycolysis could be reconstructed, there is no physiological evidence that G. sulfurreducens can grow with glucose as an electron donor (12). This is most likely due to the fact that no sugar transporters appear to be present in the genome of G. sulfurreducens. Incorporation of the appropriate transporters into the model suggested that G. sulfurreducens could be genetically engineered to grow not only on glucose but also on substrates such as threonine, malate, and glycerol. This possibility is currently under experimental investigation.
As described above, G. sulfurreducens can neither oxidize fumarate for the production of energy nor utilize fumarate as a carbon source (12, 19, 34). The only potential fumarate transporter that could be conclusively identified in the G. sulfurreducens genome was a homolog of the dicarboxylate exchanger of Wolinella succinogenes (86), which can catalyze the exchange of fumarate and succinate (DcuB encoded by GSU2751). This gene is absent from the genome of a closely related species, G. metallireducens, which cannot grow with fumarate as an electron acceptor. Expression of G. sulfurreducens DcuB in G. metallireducens renders it capable of exploiting fumarate as an electron acceptor, suggesting that DcuB is indeed involved in fumarate uptake (11). Model simulations with DcuB as the only route of fumarate entry indicated that a possible explanation for the inability of G. sulfurreducens to assimilate fumarate as a carbon source is the requirement for equimolar succinate secretion by the exchanger in order to allow fumarate uptake. Since these results appear to be consistent with experimental data, the only mode of fumarate uptake that was incorporated into the model was this dicarboxylate exchanger.
Comparisons of amino acid synthesis by G. sulfurreducens and E. coli metabolic networks.
The abilities of the E. coli (iJR904) (79) and G. sulfurreducens metabolic networks to synthesize amino acids with acetate serving as the sole carbon source and electron donor were compared. The reactions associated with Fe(III) reduction in the in silico model of G. sulfurreducens were incorporated into the E. coli model. The ATP maintenance parameters and the electron transport chain in E. coli were replaced with the corresponding parameters and reactions from G. sulfurreducens in order to isolate the role of central metabolism and eliminate the effect of differences in electron transport on the ability to synthesize amino acids. The amino acid production rate was maximized for each individual amino acid at a fixed acetate uptake rate of 10 mmol/gdw/h. By analyzing the differences in the predicted yields under identical growth conditions, it was possible to detect differences in the metabolic capabilities of the two networks and explore the sources of any disparities. One key difference found during the present study was that the metabolic network of G. sulfurreducens was more efficient at synthesizing most amino acids when acetate was the electron donor (Fig. 3, efficiency determined as moles of amino acid synthesized per mole of acetate consumed). This discrepancy was not due to differences in the amino acid biosynthetic pathways themselves and was most dramatic in amino acids belonging to the pyruvate and aspartate families.
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. In silico comparison of maximum amino acid yields per mol of acetate for the G. sulfurreducens and E. coli metabolic networks under acetate-limiting conditions with Fe(III) as the electron acceptor. The E. coli network (79) was modified to have an electron transport chain identical to that of G. sulfurreducens. Acetate uptake rate was constrained to 10 mmol/gdw/h.
|
Analysis of the metabolic cost of extracellular quinones.
It has been hypothesized that one reason why Geobacter species predominate over other Fe(III)-reducing microorganisms in many subsurface environments is that Geobacter species expend less energy to reduce Fe(III) oxides than other Fe(III)-reducing organisms (58). Current evidence suggests that Geobacter species directly contact Fe(III) oxides (68), whereas other species, such as Geothrix (67) and possibly Shewanella (40, 68, 69) species, secrete a quinone-like water-soluble compound that serves as an electron shuttle between the surface of the cell and Fe(III), although this possibility is not without controversy (63).
In order to gain insight into the cost of producing a shuttle, menaquinone was selected as a model shuttling compound. The minimal concentration of electron shuttle that must be maintained to be effective was assumed to be 2 µM (49). In subsurface environments shuttles released extracellularly will be lost via diffusion and advection. A very conservative estimate of the rate of this loss is 1% per hour. At cell densities on the order of 106 per ml, a secretion rate of 0.02 mmol/gdw/h would be required to maintain minimal shuttle concentrations. Even with these conservative estimates and assuming a typical acetate consumption rate of 0.01 mmol/liter/h, synthesis of the quinone group of menaquinone reduced the growth rate by 9% (Fig. 4). As the size of the menaquinone molecule was increased with the addition of progressively larger side chains, the growth rate decreased by as much as 40% for the largest shuttling molecule considered.
![]() View larger version (43K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Analysis of energetic costs associated with secretion of model, electron-shuttling compounds. The growth rate reduction due to the ATP and carbon requirements for menaquinone synthesis is presented. Growth rates are shown as a fraction of the maximum achieved with an acetate uptake rate of 10 mmol/gdw/h and Fe(III)-citrate provided as the electron acceptor.
|
Functional analysis of G. sulfurreducens mutant phenotypes.
The availability of a genome scale model also enabled the characterization of systems level properties of the metabolic network. One such property is the set of genes and reactions that are essential to support growth in a defined medium. This information is important for genetic investigations since it can provide insight into which mutations may or may not have an observable phenotype.
In silico deletion analysis (26) for growth with acetate as the electron donor and Fe(III)-citrate or fumarate as the electron acceptor indicated that most mutations were predicted to have either lethal [139 for fumarate and 143 for Fe(III)] or silent [440 for fumarate and 437 for Fe(III)] phenotypes (Fig. 5 and Table S4 in the supplemental material). Lethal mutations (e.g., deletion of acetyl-CoA transferase and pyruvate carboxylase) reflected the inability of the perturbed network to synthesize essential components from acetate, a relatively simple two-carbon compound, or the fact that a nonfermentable substrate such as acetate presents few alternative energy-yielding oxidative mechanisms.
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Impact of in silico deletion of single genes, or entire reactions, on predicted growth rate of G. sulfurreducens. The impact of all possible single-gene (n = 588) and reaction (n = 522) deletions were analyzed. A histogram of the percentage of deletions resulting in no growth (lethal), a growth rate greater than zero but less than that of the wild type (intermediate), and wild-type growth rate (silent) is shown for both fumarate- and Fe(III)-reducing conditions. The acetate uptake rate was constrained to 10 mmol/gdw/h for Fe(III) citrate reduction and to 5 mmol/gdw/h for fumarate reduction. In both cases, acetate was the limiting nutrient.
|
Large-scale in silico deletion analysis identified only 17 reactions (of 522 [3.25%]) that when deleted would be nonlethal but would have an effect on growth rate during acetate-limited growth (acetate uptake of 5 mmol/gdw/h) with fumarate as the acceptor. In contrast, in silico deletion of 59 reactions (6.4% of total) in the E. coli network resulted in an intermediate growth rate during glucose-limited aerobic growth (79). The lack of many intermediate modes of growth again reflects the fact that G. sulfurreducens utilizes electron donors (acetate) and acceptors that cannot be metabolized by alternative pathways such as partial oxidation, fermentation, or routing of metabolites through pathways that would consume ATP, which is already in short supply.
Because of its importance to the energetics and TCA cycle function of Geobacter, the mutant phenotype resulting from deletion of the bifunctional succinate dehydrogenase-fumarate reductase (FrdA) was investigated further. Since a mutant in the catalytic subunit for this enzyme already has been characterized, it was possible to compare in silico and in vivo phenotypes (11). The model correctly predicted that the FrdA-deficient mutant would be unable to reduce fumarate and would be unable to grow with Fe(III)-citrate as the electron acceptor and acetate as the electron donor, since cells lacking the succinate dehydrogenase would be unable to complete the TCA cycle. Likewise, the model predicted that the mutant could grow with Fe(III)-citrate as the electron acceptor and H2 as the electron donor, if acetate was provided as a carbon source. In fact, this was the condition under which the FrdA-deficient strain was recovered.
The FrdA-deficient strain was previously reported to grow by oxidizing acetate with Fe(III)-citrate as the electron acceptor if the medium was supplemented with fumarate to allow completion of the TCA cycle (11). When "rescuing" the TCA cycle in this manner, the FrdA-deficient strain grew at a faster rate and obtained higher yields than those of the wild-type strain growing in unsupplemented medium. In model simulations, an identical phenotype was observed (Fig. 6). In this case, fumarate was not used as a carbon or energy source since G. sulfurreducens can utilize fumarate only in the fumarate reductase due to the requirement for equimolar exchange of fumarate and succinate. Thus, the increase in growth yield for the fumarate-supplemented mutant was found to be due to the elimination of the energy cost associated with the cytosolic protons produced during succinate oxidation under Fe(III)-reducing conditions.
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. In silico phenotypic analysis of the fumarate reductase/succinate dehydrogenase knockout strain ( FrdA). (A) Comparison of predicted central metabolic flux distributions in the wild-type strain growing in unsupplemented acetate-Fe(III) citrate to those of the knockout strain growing in acetate (4.88 mM)-Fe(III) citrate (30 mM) medium supplemented with 10 mM fumarate. Predicted fluxes (wild type/ FrdA, mmol/gdw/h) are indicated below enzyme names. Red arrows indicate significant flux only in the fumarate supplemented mutant strain. Dark green arrows indicate flux present only in the wild-type strain. In the cases of fumarate and succinate, "[e]" denotes extracellular, whereas "[c]" denotes cytoplasmic. (B) Comparison of predicted and experimental biomass yields for the wild type and the FrdA strain. Cells were grown in chemostats in the presence of limiting acetate at a dilution rate of 0.06 h1. Model simulations of acetate-limited growth were carried out by constraining growth rate at 0.06 h1 and minimizing the acetate uptake rate.
|
Conclusions.
The results presented here demonstrate that genome-scale metabolic modeling can enhance physiological studies of environmentally relevant microorganisms. Most previous models of microbial metabolism have been developed for microorganisms such as E. coli, for which there was already substantial physiological information. The model for G. sulfurreducens is the first integrated genome-scale model available for an organism that is capable of the complete anaerobic oxidation of organic compounds via the TCA cycle and respiration with metals. The importance of a completely balanced system-wide model of metabolism revealed the importance of cytosolic proton production and its energetic implications and was critical for elucidating previously unexplained lower cell yields during growth with Fe(III) as the electron acceptor. The model has played a critical role in the initial functional analysis of the G. sulfurreducens genome and has generated testable hypotheses regarding strategies for Fe(III) reduction, carbon assimilation, and energy production. The availability of the model can enhance the characterization of metabolism in different environments when alternative donors such as pyruvate, formate, and hydrogen are present. As investigators become more adept at isolating environmentally relevant organisms (17, 42, 78, 81, 90) and the cost and time required to sequence microbial genomes decreases, the development of genome-scale models coupled with the appropriate experimentation might accelerate understanding of other uncharacterized but environmentally relevant microorganisms.
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/. ![]()
Present address: BioTechnology Institute and Department of Microbiology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»