Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2006, p. 2564-2572, Vol. 72, No. 4
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.72.4.2564-2572.2006
Microbial Food Safety Research Unit,1 Microbial Biophysics and Residue Chemistry and Core Technologies Research Unit, Eastern Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 600 East Mermaid Lane, Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania,2 DuPont Chemical Solutions Enterprise, Experimental Station Laboratory, P.O. Box 80402, Wilmington, Delaware3
Received 7 September 2005/ Accepted 2 February 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bacterial attachment, colonization, and biofilm formation on food and food contact surfaces can serve as a source for biotransfer and cross-contamination of product, leading to health issues and increased product spoilage (3, 9). A biofilm is a community of microbes embedded in an organic polymer matrix, adhering to a surface (3). Early studies have shown that E. coli O157:H7 can form biofilms on a variety of surfaces (6, 29). In Salmonella spp. and E. coli, biofilm formation is associated with the expression of curli and exopolysaccharide (EPS), such as cellulose and colanic acid (1, 5, 27, 33). Both E. coli and certain Salmonella spp. are capable of producing curli (E. coli) or thin aggregative fimbriae (Salmonella) that bind the dye Congo red and mediate attachment to both inert surfaces and biological proteins (2, 4, 8, 13, 14, 26). In Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis, the coexpression of thin aggregative fimbriae and cellulose leads to an aggregative colony phenotype (red, dry, and rough [rdar]) when grown on medium containing the dye Congo red (27, 34).
The rdar phenotype was described for strains of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (21) as cells that form a rigid multicellular network expressing thin aggregative fimbriae, which mediate tight intracellular bonds. The rdar phenotype was associated with biofilm formation on both glass and polystyrene and formation of a tight pellicle at the air-liquid interface (19, 21). Zogaj et al. (34) showed that cellulose is a second component of the S. enterica serovar Typhimurium extracellular matrix (ECM) responsible for the rdar phenotype and biofilm formation. Cellulose-producing strains were identified by including the dye calcofluor in agar plates, which detected the ß-1,4 glucose linkages of cellulose and caused stained colonies to fluoresce under a 366-nm UV light source (34). Salmonella strains producing curli, but not cellulose, produce a brown colony phenotype (brown, dry, and rough) on agar plates containing Congo red. Strains deficient in both cellulose and curli produce a smooth and white colony (saw). Some natural strains of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis and E. coli that produce the rdar phenotype were also shown to produce cellulose and thin aggregative fimbriae (curli) (27, 34).
In a previous study, we identified two phase-variable, Congo red-binding strains of E. coli O157:H7 with an aggregative behavior that produced a dry and rough colony phenotype (32). The phase-variable, Congo red-binding phenotype is a result of variations in the 10 region of the csgD promoter which alter the level of expression of the csgDEFG operon. These strains attach in greater numbers to cultured epithelial cells and are more virulent in a mouse model (31). Using these strains, Ryu et al. (22, 23) showed that curli expression is important in biofilm formation on stainless steel and that biofilm cells were more resistant to chlorine than planktonic cells. In the present study, we evaluated the rdar phenotype of strain 43895OR and showed that, although it has many of the characteristics of the rdar strains described in Salmonella, it does not produce cellulose as an additional component of the ECM. We also tested its ability to form biofilms on several surfaces in multiple media and compared the resistance of biofilm cells and planktonic cells to different antimicrobial compounds.
|
|
|---|
30°C to minimize the phase switching of strain 43895OR to its curli-negative variant. Colony size and surface spreading were determined on Luria-Bertani (LB; Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI) agar (1.5%) made without salt (LB-NS). Plates were spotted with 2 µl of overnight cultures grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB; Difco) at 37°C and incubated at 28°C in a humid atmosphere (21). For colony size studies, three independent cultures of each strain were used to generate six replicate spots/plate. For swarming assays, three independent cultures of each strain were used to generate a single spot applied to the center of the plate, which was monitored daily for 96 h. Biofilm assays were carried out with TSB, 1/20 strength TSB (1/20-TSB), and LB-NS. The LB plates containing 200 mg/liter of calcoflour (fluorescent brightener 28; Sigma-Aldrich Corporation, St. Louis, MO) were used for detection of cellulose production. Biofilm assays on glass used microscope slides (3 by 1 in.; Corning Glass Works, Corning, NY). Stainless steel coupons of the same size were cut from no. 400 polish stainless steel provided by Seiichiro Isobe (Food Research Institute of Japan, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan). Teflon coupons were cut to size from sheets of virgin polytetrafluoroethylene (McMaster-Carr, New Brunswick, NJ). Microscope slides and coupons were degreased with acetone, washed in Liqui-Nox (Alconox, White Plains, NY), rinsed with distilled water, and autoclaved.
Western blotting.
Strains were grown on YESCA agar for 48 h at 28°C and analyzed for curli protein as previously described (20). Polymerized curli required treatment with formic acid prior to gel separation as previously described (4). Cell pellets were collected from 4 ml of cells, suspended in sterile water to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 1.0, resuspended in 200 µl of 98% formic acid for 10 m on ice, vacuum dried, and resuspended in 200 µl Laemmli buffer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). The samples were separated on an 8 to 16% Tris-HCl Ready gel (Bio-Rad) as previously described (10). The proteins were transferred to a 0.2-µm Immun-blot polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Bio-Rad) and blotted with a polyclonal anti-E. coli csgA antibody of rabbit origin, kindly provided by Jorge Giron (University of Arizona). Polyclonal antibodies were detected using the Protein Detector Western blot kit (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD).
Electron microscopy and staining.
Bacterial colony morphology was studied using strains cultured on YESCA plates for 48 h at 28°C. Solid cultures were processed for microscopy by exposing the colonies on agar to a vapor of warm 25% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) solution and adsorbed to Whatman filter paper (Whatman, Ltd., Maidstone, England) in a closed petri dish for 1 h. Next, the agar-containing colonies were excised from the dish, and the agar slabs were immersed in 50% ethanol solution for dehydration through a graded series of ethanol solutions. Following dehydration in absolute ethanol, the agar slabs with colonies were critical point dried from liquid carbon dioxide, and the dry slabs were glued to specimen stubs with carbon adhesive tabs (Electron Microscopy Sciences), sputter coated with a thin layer of gold, and examined in a model Quanta 200 scanning electron microscope (EM; FEI Co., Inc., Hillsboro, OR) operated at high vacuum in the secondary electron imaging mode at various instrumental magnifications for digital imaging. The morphology of strains grown on glass was studied using biofilms generated in LB-NS broth as described above. After a 48-h incubation at 25°C, the glass slides were washed three times with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and immersed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M imidazole (Electron Microscopy Sciences) buffer (pH 7.0) for 2 h at room temperature before dehydration in a graded series of ethanol solutions (50%, 80%, and absolute), followed by critical point drying and sputter coating. The gold-coated microscope slides were mounted directly on a multiple-sample holder accessory and imaged in the microscope as described above. For transmission EM (TEM), patches of colonies on the surface of agar culture dishes were transferred with an open loop and dispersed through agitation into a 200-µl volume of Tris-buffered saline. Ten-microliter aliquots of the dispersions were adsorbed to a thin film of amorphous carbon on copper grids for about 30 s and then washed with a controlled stream of 5 to 8 drops of Tris-buffered saline, followed by a few drops of 2% uranyl acetate stain solution. Excess stain was adsorbed with Whatman filter paper, and grids were air dried before examination in a CM12 electron microscope (FEI Co., Inc., Hillsboro, OR), operated in the bright-field mode. Photographic images were made at various instrumental magnifications to resolve the details of filaments in the intercellular matrices.
Biofilm assays.
Detection and quantitation of biofilms on polystyrene were performed with 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, N.J.) using the procedure of Mireles (12) with modifications (28). Tested strains were grown overnight at 37°C in each of three different media (TSB, 1/20-strength TSB, and LB-NS), diluted 1:10 in fresh medium, and used to inoculate eight replicate wells per microtiter plate. Controls consisted of wells containing sterile medium of each type. Plates were incubated for 48 h at 28°C, heat fixed (80°C for 30 min), stained with 200 µl 0.1% crystal violet for 20 min at 25°C, washed twice with 200 µl PBS, and solubilized in 200 µl of 95% ethanol. OD590 values were determined. Each experiment was performed on a single plate and consisted of a single trial of each strain (eight replicates) grown in each medium compared to their respective controls of noninoculated media. Three independent experiments were performed. The formation of biofilms on glass, Teflon, and stainless steel coupons was determined by a modification of the procedure of Prouty et al. (16). In brief, the coupons were cleaned, sterilized, and placed in disposable, 50-ml polypropylene, screw-topped centrifuge tubes. The tubes were filled with 20 ml TSB and inoculated with 100 µl of the appropriate test strain that had been grown overnight in TSB at 37°C. The tubes were incubated for 48 h at 28°C, the media were removed, and the biofilms were heat fixed as described above. The coupons were stained in 20 ml of 0.1% crystal violet for 20 min at 28°C, removed from the tubes, and washed under a stream of 25 ml of PBS. The coupons were returned to clean tubes, the stain was solubilized in 20 ml of 95% ethanol for 15 min, and the optical density was determined at 590 nm. Each experiment consisted of three independent samples of each strain. Each sample was tested in triplicate with each of the material types (glass, Teflon, and stainless steel). Duplicate control samples for each material consisted of the corresponding coupon in sterile medium. Experiments were run twice.
Assays of bacterial resistance to mild acid, hydrogen peroxide, and quaternary ammonium compounds.
The survival of biofilm and planktonic cells following exposure to low pH, hydrogen peroxide, or quaternary ammonium compounds was determined using biofilms generated on glass coupons. Biofilms were generated in either LB-NS or TSB for 48 h at 28°C as described above. Unattached cells growing in the broth surrounding the mature biofilm were expected to be in the stationary phase of growth. A 1.5-ml sample of the unattached cells was collected by centrifugation (5 min at 13,000 x g) and used as the planktonic cell sample. The glass slides with attached biofilms were exposed to 20 ml of the test compound in the appropriate diluent. Planktonic cells were resuspended in 1.5 ml of the test compound in diluent. Control samples were exposed to the diluent only. After incubation for the desired time, the test solutions were removed from the biofilm samples by being pipetted, and the samples were washed once with an equal volume of neutralization solution and once with sterile PBS. For the planktonic samples, the test solutions were immediately neutralized with 1.5 ml of 2x neutralization solution before being collected by centrifugation and then washed once with 1.5 ml of neutralization solution and once with 1.5 ml of PBS. After being washed, the planktonic samples were resuspended to their original volume in 0.1% peptone water (BBL/Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD), serially diluted, and plated for enumeration of CFU per milliliter. The coupons, with attached biofilms, were moved to clean centrifuge tubes containing 20 ml of 0.1% peptone water and 0.25 g of glass beads. The cells were dislodged by being vortexed for 1 min, and cells were enumerated as for the planktonic samples. Determination of the resistance of strains to acidic conditions followed the procedure of Scher et al. (24). Cells were exposed to citrate phosphate buffer (40 mM citric acid [Amresco, Solon, OH], 20 mM dibasic sodium phosphate [Mallinkrodt Specialty Chemicals Co., Paris, KY], pH 3.0) for 2 h and neutralized with 0.1 M Na2S2O3 (Sigma-Aldrich). Exposure to hydrogen peroxide followed the procedure of Robbins et al. (17). Strains were exposed to 5% H2O2 (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS (Boston Bioproducts, Inc., Worcester, MA) for 10 min and neutralized with 1% sodium pyruvate (Sigma-Aldrich). The concentrated BDD Backdown detergent disinfectant (Decon Laboratories, Inc., Bryn Mawr, PA), which contains alkyl dimethyl ethylbenzyl ammonium chloride and alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride, each at 2.25%, was used to determine the resistance to quaternary ammonium compounds. Biofilm and planktonic cells were exposed to a 1:64 dilution in distilled H2O for either 60 s or 120 s and neutralized with Dey-Engley neutralizing broth as previously described (30). Three independent samples of each strain were tested under each condition, and samples were plated in duplicate for enumeration of resistant CFU. Experiments were run twice.
Statistical analyses.
The means of colony measurements were compared using Student's t tests. The data from biofilm formation and population reductions were compared by an analysis of variance; the means were separated by a Bonferroni least significant difference technique using SAS (SAS/STAT 9.1, Cary, NC). The level of significance for all comparisons was set at a P value of <0.05.
|
|
|---|
Electron microscopy of strains grown on agar.
E. coli strain 43895OW grown on YESCA agar for 48 h at 30°C displayed a smooth-surfaced, rod-shaped morphology with the expression of an occasional single filamentous structure (Fig. 1A). However, cells of strain 43895OR, when grown under the same conditions, appeared as tightly packed, slightly longer rods with regular, roughened surfaces. The cells expressed large amounts of ECM projections, many terminating as smooth round droplets, that formed a dense, continuous network with the adjacent bacteria (Fig. 1B). Negative-staining transmission EM of 43895OR showed a network with fine filamentous curli fibers (Fig. 1C).
![]() View larger version (162K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Topographical images of colonies of E. coli O157:H7 strains 43895OW (saw) (A) and 43895OR (rdar) (B) grown and fixed on YESCA agar for 48 h at 28°C. (C) Negatively stained TEM of dispersed colonies of strain 3895OR (rdar) harvested from a YESCA plate grown for 48 h at 28°C and stained with uranyl acetate. (D) Immunoblot of formic acid-treated cells collected from YESCA plates after 48 h at 28°C. Separated proteins of strains 43895OR (lane 1) and 43895OW (lane 2) reacted with anti-CsgA antibody. The arrow indicates the position of the 15-kDa marker. The predicted monomeric form of CsgA is 15.1 kDa.
|
Calcofluor staining.
The results of the calcofluor staining experiments following incubation for 72 h are shown in Fig. 2. S. enterica serovar Enteritidis strain 3934 (curli positive, cellulose positive), displayed bright fluorescence when exposed to UV light at both 48 and 72 h. All other strains were negative for fluorescence following 48 h (results not shown). After 72 h, both strains 1170/97 (curli negative, cellulose negative) and 43895OW were not fluorescent; strains 942 (curli positive, cellulose negative) and 43895OR were only weakly fluorescent. These results indicate that unlike certain strains of Salmonella that displayed a red and dry colony phenotype, strain 43895OR did not produce significant quantities of extracellular cellulose concurrent with curli expression.
![]() View larger version (77K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Fluorescence (366 nm) of bacterial strains grown on LB agar containing 200 mg/liter calcofluor at 28°C for 72 h. (A) S. enterica serovar Enteritidis strain 3934 (curli positive; cellulose positive); (B) S. enterica serovar Enteritidis strain 942 (curli positive; cellulose negative); (C) S. enterica serovar Enteritidis strain 1170/97 (curli negative; cellulose negative); (D) E. coli 0157:H7 strain 43895OR; (E) E. coli 0157:H7 strain 43895OW.
|
![]() View larger version (77K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Crystal violet-stained glass coupons from biofilm assays with strains 43895OW (A) and 43895OR (B). Coupons were submerged in 50-ml tubes containing 20 ml LB-NS broth for 48 h at 28°C. The arrowhead indicates the medium fill line.
|
![]() View larger version (107K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Scanning electron micrographs of glass coupons with biofilms generated in LB-NS medium for 48 h at 28°C. (A) E. coli O157:H7 strain 43895OW (saw) from the region of the slide immediately below the medium-air interface. (B) E. coli O157:H7 strain 43895OR (rdar) from the biofilm pellicle located below the medium-air interface.
|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Biofilm formation of E. coli O157:H7 strains 43895OR and 43895OW on polystyrene in TSB, 1/20 tryptic soy broth, and LB-NS. Each bar represents the mean optical density measured at 590 nm ± standard deviation of eight replicates from a single sample taken from each of three independent trials for strains 43895OR and 43895OW or two independent trials from the medium controls.
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Biofilm formation of E. coli O157:H7 strains 43895OR and 43895OW on glass, Teflon, and stainless steel in LB broth (without salt). Each bar represents the mean optical density measured at 590 nm ± standard deviation of a single sample taken from each of three independent trials for strains 43895OR and 43895OW or two independent trials from the medium controls.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Survival of biofilm and planktonic cells of strains 43895OR and 43895OW following exposure to hydrogen peroxide (5.0% for 10 min at 28°C), quaternary ammonium sanitizer (1:64 dilution for 1 min and 2 min at 28°C), or citric acid (pH = 3.0 for 2 h at 28°C)a
|
The results of the exposure of biofilm and planktonic cells of 43895OR and 43895OW to citric acid (pH = 3.0) are also shown in Table 1. There was no statistical difference in the survival of either strain compared to their untreated controls for either planktonic or biofilm cells following exposure to acid for 2 h (P > 0.05).
|
|
|---|
We also looked at the ability of the variants of strain 43895 to form biofilms on different surfaces. Our finding that strain 43895OR (rdar) produced significantly more biofilm than strain 43895OW (saw) on stainless steel is in agreement with that of Ryu et al. (23), who tested these same strains on stainless steel coupons and found greater attachment of the curli-producing strain, with the level of attachment reaching near maximum by 48 h. The current study shows that strain 43895OR also produces significantly more biofilm than strain 43895OW on three additional surfaces: polystyrene, glass, and Teflon. In a recent study (15), several pairs of curli-expressing and non-curli-expressing variants of EHEC isolated from the same stock culture were tested on polystyrene, glass, stainless steel, and rubber. The results indicated that curliated strains of some pairs, but not others, attached in greater numbers than their noncurliated isogenic variants. There were also differences between the curliated strains and their noncurliated variants in attachment on certain surfaces, but no differences on others. However, the EM characterization of the cells in that study clearly indicates differences in the ECM between the curli-producing strains used by Pawar et al. (15) and the rdar strain used in this study. These differences in the ECM may explain the differences in biofilm formation between the strains in these two studies. It is clear that the expression of curli and the ability to form biofilms vary greatly among strains and even among isolates within a strain.
Strain 43895OR produced a dense biofilm on polystyrene in two different rich media but produced little biofilm in 1/20-TSB. These findings are in contrast to those of Dewanti and Wong (6), who found that low-nutrient media enhanced the development of E. coli O157:H7 biofilms on stainless steel. Our study indicates that biofilm formation by strain 43895OR is greatly reduced when generated in a low-nutrient environment. Whether this difference is due to a greater nutrient requirement resulting from a constitutive ECM expression in strain 43895OR is unclear.
In the challenge studies with microbicidal agents, we noticed that large numbers of strain 43895OW cells were dislodged from the glass slides of untreated control tubes following the 48-h incubation. Although the numbers were >2 log10 CFU/ml lower than numbers recovered from the untreated controls of strain 43895OR, we found these numbers to be unexpectedly high, in light of the fact that the crystal violet biofilm assays showed that the adhesion of strain 43895OW was often not statistically different from that of the medium controls. This prompted us to verify the presence of cells on the glass slides by scanning electron microscopy. While strain 43895OR formed a dense, well-organized biofilm, strain 43895OW formed only scattered clusters of monolayer cells. The numbers of cells we found on the slides with strain 43895OW were lower than expected, but it may be that the 43895OW cells were more loosely attached and dislodged more easily during the EM processing. Nevertheless, the finding that strain 43895OW (saw) expressed ECM and attached to glass indicates that the expression of curli fibers and ECM can be induced in saw strains upon exposure to solid surfaces under the right conditions. We also dislodged the cells from slides growing with either strain 43895OR or strain 43895OW during biofilm studies and immediately plated the cells (and the corresponding planktonic cells) on CRI plates, which were incubated for 48 h at 28°C (data not shown). We found that ca. 5% of the planktonic cells of strain 43895OR had phase switched to the white variant. This is not surprising, as we have previously shown (32) that a phase switch of the Congo red-binding (rdar) variant to the nonbinding (saw) variant will occur after several passages in rich broth. However, when we plated cells that were dislodged from the biofilm of strain 43895OR, we found that all cells displayed the rdar phenotype on CRI plates. This could indicate that white variants are less likely to incorporate into an existing biofilm and/or that the cells already existing within the biofilm are under pressure to remain in the rdar phase. When the planktonic cells of strain 43895OW were plated on CRI agar, all colonies were of the saw phenotype. Again, this is not surprising, as previous studies have shown that the white variants do not revert back to a dry, red phenotype with the promoter mutation (32). When strain 43895OW cells were dislodged from the glass slide, a few colonies (<1%) showed a Congo red-binding phenotype that, unlike the rdar phenotype, was pale red and smooth (results not shown). These colonies could reflect some of the cells of strain 43895OW that express curli fibers when attached to glass (Fig. 4A). However, the different colony phenotype on CRI agar, compared to that for strain 43895OR, indicates differences in the surface structure. This suggests that while certain mutant strains of E. coli O157:H7 are capable of producing dense biofilms, as shown by the highly aggregative, rdar phenotype of strain 43895OR, the full expression of all factors required for maximum biofilm formation by the parent strain (ATCC 43895) may remain repressed under laboratory conditions. While curli expression may be induced, other factors required for full biofilm development may not be. In a study of E. coli EPS and biofilm formation, colanic acid was shown to be important for biofilm development but not required for attachment (5). Whether colanic acid, rather than cellulose, is important for the robust development of strain 43895OR biofilms is unknown. We are currently working on identifying the EPS components involved in the highly aggregative behavior and biofilm formation of strain 43895OR.
We also tested the affects of microbicidal agents on both planktonic and biofilm cells of strains 43895OR and 43895OW. Our finding that both 43895OW and 43895OR showed complete resistance to the killing effects of acid (pH = 3.0), whether in a biofilm or as planktonic cells, is in agreement with the findings of Scher et al. (24), who found that pellicle cells of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (rdar) and the associated stationary-phase planktonic cells were completely resistant to the effects of acid. Although there is little information in the literature comparing the effects of hydrogen peroxide on planktonic cells versus biofilm cells from strains of E. coli O157:H7, studies have shown that biofilm cells of Listeria monocytogenes were more resistant than planktonic cells to hydrogen peroxide exposure (17). Our results confirmed a similar pattern of resistance for the biofilm cells of E. coli O157:H7. Likewise, our finding that biofilm cells were more resistant to a quaternary ammonium compound is in agreement with that of Stopforth et al. (30), who showed similar results for E. coli O157:H7 growing in biofilms on stainless steel. Collectively, these studies indicate that cells of both of the variants of strain 43895 (43895OR and 43895OW), when attached to solid surfaces, are more resistant to sanitizers than the corresponding planktonic cells. As 43895OR cells formed a larger biofilm, there was a protective advantage in numbers for strain 43895OR over strain 43895OW. Surprisingly, at the levels tested, the scattered clusters of strain 43895OW cells attached to glass did not seem to be more sensitive to hydrogen peroxide or quaternary ammonium sanitizer than the densely packed biofilm cells of strain 43895OR. In fact, strain 43895OW biofilm cells were more resistant to the effects of hydrogen peroxide, based on cell viability comparison to the untreated controls, than strain 43895OR biofilm cells. This suggests that factors in strain 43895OR that result in a more robust biofilm may contribute to a slightly increased susceptibility to environmental oxidative stress by an unknown mechanism. In planktonic cell form, strain 43895OR was more resistant to quaternary ammonium sanitizer, compared to controls, than strain 43895OW. This may indicate that components of the constitutively produced ECM of strain 43895OR may provide protection for unattached cells against certain sanitizers.
In this study, we have shown that the rdar phenotype of strain 43895OR is similar to that described for certain strains of Salmonella and is important in multicellular behavior, biofilm production, and resistance to certain bactericidal compounds. However, strain 43895OR does not produce cellulose as part of the ECM. The studies of strain 43895OW attached to glass indicate that curli fibers can be expressed during attachment to glass. However, the difference in the colony phenotype between strain 43895OW recovered from glass and strain 43895OR indicates differences other than the expression of curli. Strain 43895OR may serve as a valuable strain for investigation of these composition differences and characterization of other factors involved in biofilm formation. Moreover, strain 43895OW may serve as a valuable strain for the study of the selective expression of factors involved in biofilm formation under different conditions.
Mention of trade names or commercial products in this document is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»