Kelly E. Fletcher,1
Kirsti M. Ritalahti,1
Robert P. Apkarian,6
Natalia Ramos-Hernández,3
Robert A. Sanford,4
Noha M. Mesbah,5 and
Frank E. Löffler1,2*
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering,1 School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0512,2 Industrial Biotechnology Program, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Campus, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico 00681-9012,3 Department of Geology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801-2352,4 Department of Microbiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-2605,5 Integrated Microscopy and Microanalytical Facility, Department of Chemistry, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 303226
Received 8 December 2005/ Accepted 10 February 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The considerable knowledge that has accrued on the fate of specific contaminants and the bacteria involved in the transformation and degradation pathways has led to successful bioremediation field studies. For instance, acetate additions to stimulate dissimilatory metal-reducing organisms promoted reduction of soluble U(VI) to insoluble U(IV) and contributed to plume containment (2, 15, 21). Biostimulation and bioaugmentation approaches were also successfully implemented at chloroethene-contaminated sites (13, 29, 39). The majority of sites, however, contain multiple contaminants, and mixed-waste scenarios are a major challenge that successful remedies must address. Many U(VI)-impacted DOE sites have elevated concentrations of nitrate, sulfate, chlorinated solvents (e.g., PCE and TCE), and other chloroorganic pollutants, including polychlorinated biphenyls (47). Unfortunately, mixed-waste scenarios received little attention, and the effects of cocontaminants on desired biotransformation processes are unclear. Obviously, populations that consume toxic electron acceptors (i.e., oxidized radionuclides and chloroorganic compounds) under a range of redox conditions (e.g., in the presence of alternate, energetically favorable oxidants) are desirable at sites impacted by nitrate, uranium, and chlorinated solvents.
In this study, we report the isolation and characterization of a novel Geobacter species, strain SZ, capable of coupling the oxidation of acetate and H2 to the reduction of a variety of electron acceptors, including PCE, TCE, nitrate, and uranium.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
16S rRNA gene sequencing and phylogenetic analysis.
Genomic DNA was obtained from PCE-acetate-, Fe(III)-acetate-, and nitrate-acetate-grown cultures. Individual genomic DNA was extracted with a QIAamp DNA mini kit (QIAGEN, Santa Clarita, CA). 16S rRNA genes were PCR amplified using a universal bacterial primer pair (8F and 1525R) and 50 ng of genomic DNA as the template and sequenced as described previously (31, 43). Related 16S rRNA gene sequences from cultured organisms and environmental clones were identified by BLAST analysis and obtained from GenBank. Distance matrices and phylogenetic trees were generated following sequence alignment using the MegAlign program of the Lasergene software package (DNA Star Inc., Madison, MI). Bootstrap values were calculated for 1,000 replicates with the MEGA software program (27). Geobacter sulfurreducens and Geobacter metallireducens were kindly provided by Kelly Nevin, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Benjamin Griffin, Michigan State University, East Lansing, provided a culture of Geobacter (formerly Trichlorobacter) thiogenes strain K1 (10, 22). Desulfuromonas michiganensis strain BB1 was isolated in our laboratory (46).
RFLP analysis of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA genes.
Genomic DNA was extracted from acetate-fed cultures amended with Fe(III) citrate, nitrate, PCE, or fumarate as the electron acceptor. PCR with primer pair 8F and 1525R and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of the amplicons using HhaI, MspI, and RsaI were performed as described previously (31, 43). Controls included genomic DNA from G. thiogenes, G. sulfurreducens, and D. michiganensis strain BB1.
DNA-DNA hybridization.
Genomic DNA was isolated from fumarate-acetate-grown strain SZ and G. thiogenes cultures using a French pressure cell and chromatographic purification on hydroxyapatite (5). DNA-DNA hybridization was carried out as described previously (8) under consideration of the modifications introduced by Huss et al. (23), using a model Cary 100 Bio UV/Vis spectrophotometer equipped with a Peltier-thermostatted 6 x 6 multicell changer and a temperature controller with an in situ temperature probe (Varian). DNA-DNA hybridization was performed at the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH (Braunschweig, Germany).
Rep-PCR.
To discriminate between strain SZ and its closest relative, G. thiogenes, repetitive extragenic palindromic PCR (Rep-PCR) was conducted using the REP-1R/REP-2I primer pair and 100 to 150 ng of genomic DNA as the template as described previously (42, 48). PCR-amplified fragments were resolved on 1.5% agarose gels run in 1x Tris-acetate-EDTA buffer at 100 V (3.3 V/cm of gel length) for 6 h. The fragments were visualized with UV light following staining for 30 min with aqueous ethidium bromide solution (3 µg/ml) and destaining for 20 min in distilled water.
G+C content.
The mole percent G+C content was determined by a modification of the method described by Mesbah et al. (41). DNA (6 to 11 µg) obtained from acetate-fumarate-grown (10 mM each) cultures of strain SZ and G. thiogenes was diluted to a final volume of 70 µl with sterile distilled water. The solution was heated in a boiling water bath for 2 min and then immediately placed on ice. Then, 5 µl of 0.3 M sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0), 5 µl of 20 mM ZnSO4, and 5 µl S1 nuclease (0.2 U µl1 in 30 mM sodium acetate buffer) were added. The samples were incubated at 37°C for 2 h, and 10 µl of bovine intestinal mucosal alkaline phosphatase (0.1 U µl1) in 0.1 M glycine hydrochloride buffer (pH 10.4) was added. The samples were incubated at 37°C overnight, centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 4 min, and stored at 20°C until chromatographic analysis.
Characterization of substrate utilization and growth conditions.
Electron acceptor utilization was tested in bicarbonate-buffered medium amended with 5 mM acetate. The following compounds were added to duplicate 160-ml serum bottles containing 100 ml of medium (aqueous concentrations are given in parentheses): PCE (0.17 to 0.33 mM), TCE (0.32 to 0.63 mM), cis-1,2-dichloroethene (DCE) (0.28 mM), trans-1,2,-dichloroethene (0.21 mM), 1,1,-dichloroethene (0.19 mM), vinyl chloride (0.1 mM), carbon tetrachloride (0.1 mM), 1-chloroethane (0.1 mM), 1,1-dichloroethane (0.1 mM), 1,2-dichloroethane (0.1 mM), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (0.1 mM), 1,1,2-trichloroethane (0.1 mM), 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (0.1 mM), trichloroacetate (0.5 to 2 mM), trifluoroacetate (1 mM), U(VI) (0.1 to 2 mM), Fe(III) citrate (5 to 10 mM), NO3 (5 to 10 mM), NO2 (1 to 10 mM), fumarate (5 to 10 mM), malate (5 mM), SO42 (5 to 10 mM), SO3 (0.5 to 5 mM), poorly crystalline Fe(III) oxide (4 to 12 mM, nominal concentration), MnO2 (1 to 2 mM), and oxygen (5 to 10% [vol/vol]). Liquid chloroethenes were added undiluted or from autoclaved hexadecane stock solutions 1 day prior to inoculation (46). All other halogenated solvents were added undiluted using a gas-tight Hamilton syringe (1800 series; Hamilton, Reno, NV). Gaseous compounds were added by plastic syringe. Nonvolatile compounds were added from aqueous, anoxic, neutralized, sterilized stock solutions by syringe. Oxygen was added as sterilized air (breathing quality) (Airgas, Inc., Randor, PA) to medium that did not receive reductants and resazurin. Elemental sulfur was added as an aqueous, repeatedly pasteurized (at 90°C), and powdered S0 suspension. Soluble ferric iron was added from an aqueous, neutralized, and autoclaved ferric citrate stock solution (0.5 M). Poorly crystalline Fe(III) oxide and MnO2 were synthesized and added as described previously (36, 37). A U(VI) stock solution was prepared by dissolving 0.635 g uranyl acetate in 50 ml of a 30 mM bicarbonate solution (17). All cultures received a 1% (vol/vol) inoculum from an acetate-PCE-grown culture that had consumed all PCE.
The ability of the new isolate to use alternate electron donors was evaluated with duplicate bottles amended with 0.33 mM PCE or 5 mM Fe(III) citrate. The following substrates were tested at the concentrations given in parentheses: H2 (50,000 ppmv, 123 µmol), pyruvate (5 mM), yeast extract (0.01 to 0.1%, wt/vol), formate (10 mM), propionate (10 mM), lactate (10 mM), citrate (5 mM), succinate (5 mM), butyrate (10 mM), benzoate (10 mM), glucose (10 mM), methanol (0.08 to 0.4 mM), toluene (0.5 mM), benzene (0.5 mM), and ethanol (0.1 to 0.3 mM). Sodium salts were added from anoxic, sterile stock solutions before inoculation. Sterile H2 gas was added by syringe, and undiluted alcohols, toluene, and benzene were added with a Hamilton syringe. Electron donor oxidation was judged by its consumption and/or the reduction of PCE or Fe(III) compared to that of control cultures that received no electron donor. All cultures received a 1% (vol/vol) inoculum from an acetate-PCE-grown culture that had consumed all acetate.
Possible carbon sources were examined in duplicate cultures amended with PCE or Fe(III) citrate and H2 (50,000 ppmv, 123 µmol). Formate, propionate, lactate, citrate, succinate, butyrate, glucose (5 mM each), and yeast extract (0.1%, wt/vol) were tested. The reduction of PCE and Fe(III) was monitored and compared with that of duplicate control cultures that did not contain H2. The bottles received a 1% (vol/vol) inoculum from an acetate-PCE-grown culture that had consumed all acetate.
Temperature and pH optima were determined in 27-ml anaerobic culture tubes containing 15 ml medium amended with acetate and fumarate (5 mM each). Triplicate vials were incubated at temperatures of 4, 10, 15, 22, 30, 35, and 40°C. To test the effect of pH on the growth of strain SZ, bicarbonate-free medium was amended with 20 mM MES [2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid] or 20 mM HEPES. The medium pH values were adjusted to 5.5, 6.0, and 6.5 (MES) and 7.0, 7.5, and 8.0 (HEPES). All vials received a 1% (vol/vol) inoculum from an acetate-fumarate-grown culture and were incubated at 35°C. Growth was judged by measuring the consumption of fumarate and associated succinate formation in triplicate cultures.
PCE dechlorination by phylogenetically related species.
G. thiogenes, G. sulfurreducens, and G. metallireducens were tested for their abilities to dechlorinate PCE. Duplicate cultures were amended with 0.1 mM PCE as the electron acceptor and 5 mM acetate as the electron donor. Experiments were initiated by adding 5% (vol/vol) inoculum from Fe(III) citrate-acetate-grown G. sulfurreducens and G. metallireducens cultures or fumarate-acetate-grown G. thiogenes cultures. Reductive dechlorination of PCE was monitored over a 3-month incubation period. All cultures were incubated statically at room temperature in the dark.
Determination of electron donor consumption threshold concentrations.
Triplicate bottles were amended with an excess electron acceptor [0.33 mM PCE, 5 mM Fe(III) citrate, or 5 mM nitrate], H2 as the sole electron donor (8,333 ppmv, 20.4 µmol), and 5 mM lactate as a carbon source. One set of triplicate control cultures was amended with each electron acceptor and lactate as the carbon source and had N2 and CO2, but no hydrogen, in the headspace. The inoculum (1%, vol/vol) was transferred from dechlorinating cultures that had consumed all acetate. Concentrations of chlorinated compounds, Fe(III), Fe(II), nitrate, ammonium, and H2, were monitored over time. After a constant H2 threshold concentration was reached, another 20.4 µmol of H2 was added to all cultures, and H2 consumption was monitored again.
The acetate consumption threshold concentration for strain SZ was determined using the same three terminal electron acceptors, PCE, Fe(III) citrate, and nitrate. Strain SZ cultures were amended with 0.1 mM acetate and 0.33 mM PCE, 7.5 mM Fe(III) citrate, or 2 mM nitrate. The cultures were incubated at room temperature until reduction of the respective electron acceptor ceased due to electron donor limitation. For the dechlorinating cultures, [14C]acetate (59 µCi/mmol; Sigma-Aldrich, MO) was added to triplicate cultures at concentrations of 447 nM and 894 nM. Triplicate cultures amended with Fe(III) or nitrate received 894 nM [14C]acetate as the electron donor. After no further acetate consumption occurred in dechlorinating cultures, an additional 894 nM [14C]acetate was added and its consumption monitored. All cultures were incubated at room temperature in the dark without agitation.
Rate and yield measurements.
Reduction rates were determined in triplicate 100-ml cultures amended with 5 mM acetate and 0.33 mM PCE, 3 mM Fe(III) citrate, or 3.5 mM NO3 that had received a 3% (vol/vol) inoculum from acetate-PCE-, Fe(III) citrate-, or nitrate-pregrown cultures, respectively. After reduction of the electron acceptor provided was complete, reduced products (cis-DCE, ferrous iron, and ammonium) and acetate concentrations were determined, and the protein increase (difference between initial and final protein concentrations) was estimated.
Influence of different electron acceptors on PCE dechlorination.
To test the influence of alternate electron acceptors on PCE reductive dechlorination, duplicate cultures amended with PCE (0.33 mM) plus Fe(III) citrate (5 mM), PCE plus U(VI) (0.3 mM), and PCE plus nitrate (5 mM), with acetate (10 mM) as the electron donor, were established. The experiments were initiated by adding a 3% (vol/vol) inoculum of a strain SZ culture grown with PCE and acetate that had consumed all PCE. Control cultures were amended with the same electron acceptors but received the same amount of filter-sterilized inoculum. Consumption of electron acceptors and production of cis-DCE, Fe(II), and ammonium were monitored over time. In addition, the effects of sulfur oxyanions (sulfate, up to 10 mM; and sulfite, up to 5 mM) on reductive dechlorination were examined.
Microscopy.
Light micrographs were obtained with an Olympus BX40 microscope after the cells and flagella were stained with silver nitrate (51). Cells were collected by centrifugation (1,288 x g for 20 min at room temperature) from cultures grown with soluble (nitrate, PCE, and fumarate) and insoluble [poorly crystalline Fe(III) oxide, elemental sulfur, and MnO2] electron acceptors. Scanning electron micrographs were obtained from fumarate-grown cultures as described previously (18).
Analytical procedures.
Chloroethenes, chloroethanes, and volatile fatty acids were quantified by gas chromatography as described previously (19). Dehalogenation of trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and trifluoroacetic acid was monitored by chloride and fluoride ion releases. Oxygen concentrations in the headspace were measured with a Hewlett-Packard (HP) model 5890 GC equipped with a thermal conductivity detector and a Chrompack Molsieve 5-Å fused silica column (10 m by 0.53 µm). For analysis of [14C]acetate, 1 ml of culture suspension was made basic by adding 10 µl of 1 M NaOH and pushed through a 0.2-µm Millipore cellulose membrane filter. Radiolabeled acetate was quantified with an HP 1050 high-performance liquid chromatography system equipped with a C-61OH carbohydrate Supelcogel column (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA) and a 500 TR series flow scintillation analyzer (Packard Instrument, Meriden, CT). The solvent system was 0.1% H3PO4 at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Inorganic anions and cations were analyzed with an ion chromatograph equipped with a CD 20 conductivity detector and two AS11-HC 2-mm columns for anions and a CS12A column for cations (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA). Formation of N2O, a potential denitrification product, was monitored on an HP 6890 gas chromatograph equipped with an HP-1 column (30-m length, 0.32-mm diameter, and 0.25-µm film thickness) and a 63Ni electron capture detector. Sulfide was determined colorimetrically as described previously (7). Fe(II) production was measured using the ferrozine method (45). The decrease of Mn(IV) and U(VI) was monitored spectrophotometrically (4, 25). Growth was monitored by measuring electron acceptor consumption or protein increase. The Coomassie Plus protein assay reagent kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, Il) was used in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations to estimate the protein content (18).
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The nearly complete 16S rRNA gene sequence (1,478 bp) of strain SZ has been deposited in GenBank under accession number AY914177.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Culture purity.
Microscopic uniformity, recovery of PCE, Fe(III), and nitrate reduction activities from single colonies, identical 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained with genomic DNA extracted from PCE-, Fe(III)-, and nitrate-grown cultures, and indistinguishable RFLP patterns that matched those predicted from in silico digests suggested culture purity. RFLP patterns of MspI- and RsaI-digested amplicons generated from G. thiogenes, G. metallireducens, and G. sulfurreducens genomic DNA showed patterns different from those of strain SZ. HhaI-digested amplicons corroborated culture purity but failed to distinguish strain SZ from G. thiogenes, G. metallireducens, and G. sulfurreducens.
Morphology of strain SZ.
Cells were rod shaped and 1 to 1.4 µm long and 0.4 µm wide. Cell morphology was constant under different growth conditions and during different growth phases. Motility was observed under all growth conditions, including in cultures grown with insoluble electron acceptors [i.e., poorly crystalline Fe(III) oxide and MnO2]. Figures 1A and B illustrate silver nitrate-stained flagella of cells grown with PCE and nitrate, respectively. Scanning electron micrographs revealed flagellated, rough-surface, and rod-shaped cells in the exponential growth phase (Fig. 1C). Spores were never observed.
|
|
|
Electron donor consumption threshold concentrations.
In the presence of excess PCE, Fe(III) citrate, and nitrate, strain SZ consumed H2 to concentrations (averages ± standard deviations) of 0.08 ± 0.03, 0.16 ± 0.07, and 0.5 ± 0.06 nM, respectively. No cis-DCE, Fe(II), or ammonium formation was observed in control cultures that did not receive H2. Consistent residual acetate concentrations (averages ± standard deviations) of 3.0 ± 2.1, 1.2 ± 0.5, and 3.6 ± 0.25 nM were observed when PCE, Fe(III) citrate, and nitrate, respectively, were present in excess.
Dechlorination in presence of alternate electron acceptors.
As depicted in Fig. 4, the presence of U(VI) did not inhibit PCE dechlorination, and both electron acceptors were reduced simultaneously. At day 6, both PCE and U(VI) were completely consumed. Neither PCE nor U(VI) reduction was observed in control cultures. Similarly, strain SZ reduced Fe(III) or nitrate concomitantly with PCE (data not shown). Sulfate (10 mM) and sulfite (5 mM) did not affect PCE dechlorination, whereas the presence of oxygen completely inhibited growth of strain SZ.
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Microbial reduction of soluble U(VI) to insoluble U(IV) is a promising strategy for containment of uranium plumes. Laboratory and field studies demonstrated that adding acetate can promote activity of native Geobacter species and result in U(VI) reduction and immobilization (2, 15, 21). PCE and nitrate are frequently encountered cocontaminants at uranium-contaminated sites. The changes in free energy under standard conditions associated with PCE-to-cis-DCE dechlorination, nitrate reduction to ammonium, and U(VI) reduction to U(IV) are 72.5, 61.9, and 37.0 kJ per mol of electrons transferred, respectively (free energy of formation values are from references 11, 28, and 50). Electron acceptors are typically oxidized sequentially, with the energetically more favorable electron acceptor consumed first. Hence, one would predict that PCE dechlorination precedes ammonification and U(VI) reduction. Although standard conditions apply rarely to real- world conditions, thermodynamic calculations, assuming environmentally relevant concentrations of reactants and products and low pH values (e.g., groundwater at the Natural and Accelerated Bioremediation Research Field Research Center [www.lbl.gov/NABIR]), predict the same sequence of terminal electron-accepting processes (TEAPs). Such patterns of sequential reduction of electron acceptors have been observed at field sites and confirmed in pure culture studies (3, 16, 49). Strain SZ reduced nitrate, Fe(III) citrate, or U(VI) and PCE simultaneously, suggesting no tight control over consumption of reducing equivalents in less-favorable TEAPs. It is currently unclear whether energy is captured from all simultaneously operating reductive pathways, and the significance of this electron acceptor utilization pattern is unclear. From an ecological point of view, however, this type of behavior might give strain SZ an edge over competing populations in oligotrophic, heterogeneous subsurface environments with periodically changing influx/availability of substrates.
Strain SZ exhibited flagellar motility when grown with insoluble (i.e., amorphous ferric iron and MnO2) and soluble electron acceptors. This contrasts with observations made for G. thiogenes, which never displayed motility, and G. metallireducens. Childers et al. (6) suggested that flagellar synthesis in G. metallireducens is regulated by the available electron acceptor and occurs only when insoluble substrates are used. Apparently, the synthesis of the flagellar apparatus underlies different regulatory mechanisms in members of the Geobacter group, and further research is warranted to elucidate motility controls and how motility affects contaminant transformation.
Acetate and H2 are key intermediates in the anaerobic degradation of organic matter, and fluxes of both H2 and acetate control microbial redox processes in subsurface environments. A variety of materials have been suggested and used for delivery of reducing equivalents to support a desired TEAP, such as reductive dechlorination (14). Biostimulation ultimately increases the flux of H2 and acetate (19), but competition for reducing equivalents, in particular for H2, often limits its success. Obviously, organisms with greater electron donor versatility, in particular those that utilize acetate and H2, are more desirable for bioremediation applications aimed at stimulating reductive processes. To our knowledge, strain SZ is the first chlorinated ethene-dechlorinating organism described as utilizing both H2 and acetate as electron donors. This physiological feature offers a distinct advantage in subsurface environments where competition for reducing equivalents is fierce. Further, strain SZ consumes H2 and acetate to low concentrations. It has been shown previously that hydrogenotrophic chloroethene-respiring populations exhibit low H2 consumption threshold concentrations and maintain H2 concentrations below those needed to sustain other TEAPs, such as methanogenesis, acetogenesis, and sulfate reduction (30, 32, 40, 44, 53). Indeed, the H2 consumption threshold of 0.08 nM measured in PCE-fed cultures of strain SZ is in agreement with reported threshold values for chlororespiration (30, 32). Analogously, acetate consumption threshold concentrations depend on the thermodynamics of the TEAP (Fig. 7). Although obviously relevant, information on acetate threshold concentrations is scarce. Lovley and Phillips (35) showed that acetate threshold concentrations were lower in Fe(III)-reducing sediments than in sulfate-reducing and methanogenic sediments. Under mesophilic conditions, the acetate threshold concentration for aceticlastic methane formation ranged from 69 to 1,180 µM (52). Desulfobacter postgatei, an acetate-oxidizing sulfate reducer, consumed acetate to concentrations below 1 µM (24). Recently, He and Sanford (20) determined acetate threshold concentrations in Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans strain 2CP-C cultures for two different TEAPs. Strain 2CP-C consumed acetate to concentrations of 69 nM with 2-chlorophenol as the electron acceptor (chlororespiration) and an even lower value (<1 nM) when grown with soluble ferric iron. The observed acetate threshold value of 3.0 nM in strain SZ cultures grown with PCE is at least 3 orders of magnitude lower than those reported for methanogens and sulfidogens. According to the threshold model, acetate-oxidizing dechlorinators should outcompete acetotrophic methanogens and sulfidogens for acetate. Hence, analogous to the H2 consumption threshold model, acetate consumption threshold concentrations could serve as a diagnostic tool for the presence and activity of acetotrophic dechlorinators and for the delineation of TEAPs in subsurface environments.
|
Description of Geobacter lovleyi sp. nov.
Geobacter lovleyi was named to recognize the contributions of Derek R. Lovley to our understanding of microbial metal and radionuclide reduction. Geobacter lovleyi is a rod-shaped, motile, gram-negative, and anaerobic bacterium with cell dimensions of 1 to 1.4 µm by 0.4 µm. The G+C content of strain SZ is 56.7 ± 0.3 mol%. Electron donors include acetate, pyruvate, and H2. PCE, TCE, nitrate, soluble and insoluble forms of ferric ion, manganic ion, sulfur, fumarate, malate, and U(VI) are used as electron acceptors. PCE is reduced to cis-DCE as the final product. Optimum growth occurs at 35°C and pH 6.8. Strain SZ was isolated from noncontaminated freshwater sediment collected from Su-Zi Creek, South Korea. Phylogenetic, genotypic, and phenotypic characteristics place strain SZ in the Geobacter cluster within the family Geobacteraceae in the
-subclass of the Proteobacteria and warrant classifying strain SZ as the type strain of a new species, Geobacter lovleyi sp. nov. Strain SZ has been deposited at the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH (DSM 17278) and the ATCC (BAA-1151).
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Soojin Yi for guidance with the bootstrap analysis, Robert Apkarian from Emory University's Integrated Microscopy and Microanalytical Facility for help with electron microscopy, Jon Holt for technical assistance in determining acetate threshold concentrations, and Barny Whitman for helpful comments on the manuscript.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
In memory of Rob Apkarian. His microscopy skills and enthusiasm will truly be missed. ![]()
Present address: University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Eukaryot. Cell | All ASM Journals |
|---|