Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2006, p. 3026-3031, Vol. 72, No. 4
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.72.4.3026-3031.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Does Green Light Influence the Fluorescence Properties and Structure of Phototrophic Biofilms?
M. Roldán,1
F. Oliva,2
M. A. Gónzalez del Valle,3
C. Saiz-Jimenez,3 and
M. Hernández-Mariné1*
Departament de Productes Naturals, Biologia Vegetal i Edafologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Joan XXIII s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain,1
Departament d'Estadística, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 645, 08028 Barcelona, Spain,2
Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiologia, CSIC, Sevilla, Spain3
Received 26 August 2005/
Accepted 2 February 2006

ABSTRACT
Artificial illumination can harm works of art by inducing the
development of photosynthetic biofilms. With the aim of preventing
biodeterioration or esthetic damage to such surfaces, we evaluated
and compared the effects of illuminating biofilms formed by
Gloeothece membranacea (cyanobacteria) and
Chlorella sorokiniana (Chlorophyta) using exclusively white or green light.

INTRODUCTION
Inappropriate artificial illumination of archaeological remains
and their interior works of art (
1,
2,
3,
4) results in the
uncontrolled development of photosynthetic microorganisms, primarily
cyanobacteria and microalgae (
10,
13,
15,
19,
20), forming greenish
biofilms that contribute to surface biodeterioration. These
organisms feature a matrix composed primarily of exopolymers
(EPS) that are involved in the resistance of biofilms to adverse
abiotic conditions as well as in attachment (
3,
5,
6,
24). Owing
to their hygroscopicity (
7,
8,
11,
28), EPS can be particularly
harmful to archaeologically valuable surfaces. Control efforts
usually focus on cleaning damaged surfaces or on chemical treatments
that have little efficacy against biofilms (
5,
14). Hence, there
is an ever-increasing interest in the development of alternative
strategies for preventing and minimizing biofilm development.
Changes in spectral ambient light produce variations in pigment distribution and abundance for cyanobacteria and microalgae (17, 18, 23). In particular, green light (GL) retards growth (9), causes vacuolation in the thylakoidal system (1), and affects pigment composition (25) and fine structure (1). GL is also advantageous since it represents the maximum absorbance of human vision. We thus sought to evaluate the potential for GL to prevent biofilm growth by comparing the responses of artificial biofilms exposed to either GL or white light (WL).

Biofilm preparation.
Sterilized lime-pozzolana slabs (three slabs, 3 by 1 cm) were
inoculated with 1 g of a mixture of
Gloeothece membranacea Bornet
CCAP1430/3 (Pasteur Culture Collection, Paris, France) and
Chlorella sorokiniana Shih and Krauss SAG 211-32 (Centro de Investigaciones
Cientificas, Isla de La Cartuja, Seville, Spain). The slabs
were placed in petri dishes and stored at 19 to 22°C under
continuous GL (Narva LT 18 W/017 green TT; Narva, Czech Republic)
or WL (Chiyoda F 15 S daylight; Chiyoda Corporation, Japan)
at a constant photon flux density of 20 µmol ·
m
2 · s
1 for 60 days. The emission spectra
of the lamps were measured with a LICOR (Lincoln, NE) Li-1800
spectroradiometer (Fig.
1).

CSLM.
Confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM) was performed to establish
possible differences between GL and WL treatments in morphology,
size of thylakoidal areas, and architecture of biofilms (
20),
for which a Leica TCS-SP2 (Leica Microsystems Heidelberg GmbH,
Mannheim, Germany) was used. Autofluorescence from photosynthetic
pigments (PP) was excited with the 543- and 633-nm lines of
an Ar/HeNe laser and observed in the red channel at an emission
range of 590 to 800 nm. EPS were labeled with the carbohydrate-recognizing
lectin concanavalin A (ConA)-Alexa Fluor 488 (Molecular Probes,
Inc., Eugene, OR), excited with the 488-nm line of an Ar laser,
and viewed in the green channel at 490 to 530 nm. Unlabeled
organisms were used for a staining control. To determine the
spatial relationship between pigment fluorescence and EPS, bichannel
images were acquired in the
x-y plane at different intervals
along the
z axis. The thickness of the sample was established
as the distance from the highest position to the lowest position
of inherent pigment fluorescence. Image combining and processing
were performed with the Imaris software package, version 2.7
(Bitplane AG, Zürich, Switzerland) (
20).

Analysis of organisms.
Slabs maintained under GL exhibited colonies of two to four
cells of
G. membranacea surrounded by a relatively thick sheath
in which only the oldest wrecked external layers were labeled
by ConA (Fig.
2A). Membrane vacuolized thylakoids were seen
as empty spaces inside the cells (Fig.
2C). Slabs kept under
WL displayed
G. membranacea colonies with a larger number of
cells (with 54.1% having more than four cells) surrounded by
an apparently compact sheath that was strongly labeled in green
in all layers (Fig.
2B);
C. sorokiniana was nearly absent in
slabs maintained under GL (Fig.
2A and C), showing negative
selection under this spectral quality (
27).
Metamorph software (Universal Imaging Corp.) was used to measure
pigment fluorescence regions in three-dimensional projections
of unlabeled cells. Data sets were exported into Microsoft Excel
for analysis. In GL, the mean dimensions (length by width) for
G. membranacea (26 cells) were 6.23 ± 1.32 µm by
4.52 ± 0.40 µm; in WL (17 cells), the mean dimensions
were 6.91 ± 1.77 µm by 5.42 ± 0.55 µm.
For
C. sorokiniana, the mean dimensions under GL (48 cells)
were 3.18 ± 0.52 µm by 2.65 ± 0.57 µm;
in WL, the mean dimensions (54 cells) were 3.43 ± 0.71
µm by 2.88 ± 0.6 µm. The results for each
species were processed with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
model using SAS software. Thylakoid region width for
G. membranacea in GL compared to that in WL (
F1, 41 = 38.12;
P = 0.000) and
the thylakoid region length (
F1, 100 = 4.09;
P = 0.046) and
width (
F1, 100 = 3.83;
P = 0.053) for
C. sorokiniana were statistically
significantly smaller. Both species exhibited restricted cell
volume, a strategy used by organisms to decrease energy demands
(
26).

Analysis of biofilms.
Quantitative analysis of biofilm structure was carried out with
the GNU Public License program (Departament de Llenguatges i
Sistemes Informàtics, Universitat Politècnica
de Catalunya [
https://lafarga.cpl.upc.edu/projects/qbiof/])
based on the Comstat software package (
12). Both GL- and WL-grown
biofilms (Fig.
2 and Table
1) were formed by a layer of
G. membranacea,
with the colonies being thinner and more compact in WL (Fig.
2A and B). For biofilms exposed to GL,
C. sorokiniana was scarce
(Fig.
2A and C), whereas in WL (Fig.
2B and D), it had an irregular
density. PP biovolume (µm
3 · µm
2)
was larger for GL biofilms (Table
1), whereas the PP roughness
coefficient, which provides a measure of how much the thickness
of the biofilm varies, and PP biofilm porosity (
16) were much
lower than in WL (Table
1). The EPS porosity and roughness coefficient
were higher in GL than in WL (Table
1).
ConA labeling of
G. membranacea grown in WL suggests that its
EPS contain

-
D-mannose and/or

-
D-glucose residues, sugars to
which ConA binds with high specificity (
22). In GL, EPS of this
type were not produced; the labeled outer rings correspond to
remains from the original culture. The low efficiency of light
absorption of chlorophyll (Chl)
a in GL for
G. membranacea biofilms
and the concomitant changes in EPS production (
8,
22) would
result in a weaker attachment to the substratum (
6,
11) and
a reduction in tolerance to desiccation stress (
24).

Analysis of pigment fluorescence: lambda scan function.
The fluorescence spectra of pigments were obtained in single
cells from the intact biofilms by a noninvasive method (
21)
using a Leica TCS-SP2 microscope. Gains and offsets were equal
for each field at different excitation wavelengths (
excs) and
remained constant during the scanning process. To determine
the spectral signature of a selected area from the scanned image
(Fig.
3A and
4A), 1-µm
2 regions of interest (ROIs) taken
from the thylakoid region inside the cell were established for
each
x-y-

stack of images.
Lambda scans of both species (
n = 20 ROIs) obtained for each
exc in at least three independent experiments show that mean
fluorescence intensity (MFI) and the half-bandwidth of the spectra
from both species were different for both light types, whereas
the spectrum shapes were identical (Fig.
3 and
4).
In GL, the fluorescence spectra for all pigments in both species at all
excs were less intense than those for WL (Fig. 3A and 4A). Both species grown under WL emitted only red fluorescence of Chl a when excited with UV light (351 nm) (Fig. 3A and 4A).

Gloeothece membranacea.
In both WL and GL, fluorescence was weaker at a
exc of 488 nm
(blue region) than at a
exc of 543 nm, where the Chl
a receives
its energy from phycobilins (
20). C-phycoerythrin (PE) showed
fluorescence at an emission wavelength of ca. 580 nm when excited
at 488 nm and at its optimum
exc (543 nm). Upon comparison of
the MFI at
excs of 488 and 543 nm in both treatments, the MFI
was observed to be lower in the blue region (Fig.
3B).
For the GL sample, the highest maximum for G. membranacea corresponded to Chl a (ca. 670.7 nm), and its strongest emission was at a
exc of 488 nm. The content of PE pigment was higher than in WL, which has previously been reported as a response to low light or as a chromatic adaptation, allowing the organism to harvest light from the green-yellow bandwidths (18, 28).
The emission bands for WL samples were considerably higher (659.3 to 666.4 nm) than those for GL samples, corresponding to the phycobiliproteins C-phycocyanin (PC) and allophycocyanin (APC) (Fig. 3B); however, the proportion of Chl a fluorescence to total pigment fluorescence was much lower.

Chlorella sorokiniana.
At a
exc of 488 nm, differences in the Chl
a maximum (
max =
687.9 nm) were not observed for samples of either light type
(Fig.
4).
The mean and standard error were calculated for all the ROIs examined at each
exc. For each species and line, the significance of the results was evaluated with a repeated measures ANOVA model. Three factors were taken into account: light treatment, emission wavelength, and cell. The cell factor is nested into the light treatment, and emission wavelength is the repeated measures factor ("within-subject effects" due to the fact that every cell is measured at all wavelengths). All three factors had statistically significant differences (P < 0.05 in all cases) for the two species at every line (351, 488, and 543 nm).
At a
exc of 351 nm, significant differences in MFI were found for the emission range of 649.5 to 683.4 nm, in which PC, APC, and Chl a emit. At a
exc of 488 nm, significant differences in MFI were found for the emission range of 573.6 to 590.7 nm, in which PE emits, and 653.6 to 659.3 nm, in which PC and APC emit. Finally, at a
exc of 543 nm, significant differences in MFI were found for the emission range of 567.8 to 598.8 nm, in which PE emits, 645.3 to 668.6 nm, in which PC and APC emit, and 684.1 nm, in which Chl a emits. Statistical analysis confirmed the significance of the results outlined above (Table 2).

Conclusions.
The observations reported above suggest that GL could prevent
the growth of photosynthetic organisms, except for those capable
of modifying accessory pigments. However, even biofilms composed
of the chromatic adaptable phycoerythrin-containing
G. membranacea had lower photosynthetic pigment biovolume, smaller thylakoid
regions, and a weaker MFI in GL than in WL, all of which are
signs of retarded growth and thus suggest a possible treatment
for preventing photosynthetic biofilm growth. Although laboratory
data cannot be extrapolated to natural environments, our results
have prompted studies of the application of green light to artificially
illuminated works of art.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the EU Programme for Energy, Environment,
and Sustainable Development in the CATS Project, contract EVK4-CT-2000-00028.
We thank the Scientific and Technical Services of the University of Barcelona for their excellent technical assistance with the CSLM and the Department of Fluid Mechanics Energy Engineering at the Superior School of Engineering of the University of Seville for their assistance with the spectral measurements of light sources.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Departament de Productes Naturals, Biologia Vegetal i Edafologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Joan XXIII s/n, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain. Phone: (34) 93 4024490. Fax: (34) 93 4035879. E-mail:
marionahernandez{at}ub.edu.


REFERENCES
1 - Albertano, P. 1991. Effects of monochromatic lights on four species of Leptolyngbya. Arch. Hydrobiol. Algol. Stud. 64:199-214.
2 - Albertano, P., and L. Bruno. 2003. The importance of light in the conservation of hypogean monuments, p. 171-177. In C. Saiz-Jiménez (ed.), Molecular biology and cultural heritage. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, The Netherlands.
3 - Albertano, P., D. Moscone, G. Palleschi, B. Hermosin, C. Saiz-Jiménez, S. Sánchez-Moral, M. Hernández-Mariné, C. Urzí, I. Groth, V. Schroeckh, J. R. Gallon, F. Graziottin, F. Bisconti, and R. Giuliani. 2003. Cyanobacteria attack rocks (CATS): control and preventive strategies to avoid damage caused by cyanobacteria and associated microorganisms in Roman hypogean monuments, p. 151-162. In C. Saiz-Jiménez (ed.), Molecular biology and cultural heritage. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, The Netherlands.
4 - Ariño, X., M. Hernández-Mariné, and C. Saiz-Jiménez. 1997. Colonization of Roman tombs by calcifying cyanobacteria. Phycologia 36:366-373.
5 - Costerton, J. W., P. S. Stewart, and E. P. Greenberg. 1999. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284:1318-1322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Decho, A. W. 2000. Microbial biofilms in intertidal systems: an overview. Cont. Shelf Res. 20:1257-1273.
7 - De los Ríos, A., C. Ascaso, J. Wierzchos, E. Fernández-Valiente, and A. Quesada. 2004. Microstructural characterization of cyanobacterial mats from the McMurdo Ice Shelf, Antarctica. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:569-580.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - De Philippis, R., and M. Vicenzini. 1998. Exocellular polysaccharides from cyanobacteria and their possible applications. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 22:151-175.[CrossRef]
9 - Hauschild, C. A., H. J. McMurter, and F. R. Pick. 1991. Effect of spectral quality on growth and pigmentation of picocyanobacteria. J. Phycol. 27:698-702.[CrossRef]
10 - Hernández-Mariné, M., E. Clavero, and M. Roldán. 2003. Why there is such luxurious growth in the hypogean environments. Arch. Hydrobiol. Algol. Stud. 109:229-239.
11 - Hernández-Mariné, M., and M. Roldán. 2005. Adherence of hormogonia to substrata is mediated by polysaccharides produced by necridic cells. Arch. Hydrobiol. Algol. Stud. 117:239-249.
12 - Heydorn, A., A. T. Nielsen, M. Hentzer, C. Sternberg, M. Givskov, B. K. Ersboll, and S. Molin. 2000. Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT. Microbiology 146:2395-2407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Hoffmann, L. 2002. Caves and other low-light environments: aerophytic photoautotrophic microorganisms, p. 835-843. In G. Bitton (ed.), Encyclopedia of environmental microbiology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
14 - Kumar, R., and A. Kumar. 1999. Biodeterioration of stone in tropical environments. An overview. The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, Calif.
15 - Lefevre, M. 1974. La maladie verte de Lascaux. Stud. Conserv. 19:126-156.
16 - Lewandowski, Z. 2000. Notes on biofilm porosity. Water Res. 34:2620-2624.[CrossRef]
17 - Millie, D. F., D. A. Ingram, and C. P. Dionigi. 1990. Pigment and photosynthetic responses of Oscillatoria agardhii (Cyanophyta) to photon flux density and spectral quality. J. Phycol. 26:660-666.[CrossRef]
18 - Mullineaux, C. W. 2001. How do cyanobacteria sense and respond to light? Mol. Microbiol. 41:965-971.[CrossRef][Medline]
19 - Ortega-Calvo, J. J., M. Hernández-Mariné, and C. Saiz-Jiménez. 1993. Cyanobacteria and algae on historic buildings and monuments, p. 173-203. In K. L. Garg, H. Arai, and B. Rai (ed.), Recent advances in biodeterioration and biodegradation, vol. I. Naya Prokash, Calcutta, India.
20 - Roldán, M., E. Clavero, S. Castel, and M. Hernández-Mariné. 2004. Biofilms fluorescence and image analysis in hypogean monuments research. Arch. Hydrobiol. Algol. Stud. 111:127-143.
21 - Roldán, M., F. Thomas, S. Castel, A. Quesada, and M. Hernández-Mariné. 2004. Noninvasive pigment identification in living phototrophic biofilms by confocal imaging spectrophotometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:3745-3750.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22 - Schüßler, A., T. Meyer, H. Gehrig, and M. Kluge. 1997. Variations of lectin binding sites in extracellular glycoconjugates during the life cycle of Nostoc punctiforme, a potentially endosymbiotic cyanobacterium. Eur. J. Phycol. 32:233-239.
23 - Talarico, L. 1996. Phycobiliproteins and phycobilisomes in red algae: adaptive responses to light. Sci. Mar. 60:205-222.
24 - Tamaru, Y., Y. Takani, T. Yoshida, and T. Sakamoto. 2005. Crucial role of extracellular polysaccharides in desiccation and freezing tolerance in the terrestrial cyanobacterium Nostoc commune. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:7327-7333.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25 - Tandeau de Marsac, N., D. Mazel, T. Damerval, G. Guglielmi, V. Capuano, and J. Houmard. 1988. Photoregulation of gene expression in the filamentous cyanobacterium Calothrix sp. PCC7601. Photosynth. Res. 18:99-132.[CrossRef]
26 - Thompson, P. A., P. J. Harrison, and J. S. Parslow. 1991. Influence of irradiance on cell volume and carbon quota for ten species of marine phytoplankton. J. Phycol. 27:351-360.[CrossRef]
27 - Vila, X., and C. A. Abella. 2001. Light-harvesting adaptations of planktonic phototrophic microorganisms to different light quality conditions. Hydrobiologia 452:15-30.[CrossRef]
28 - Wotton, R. S. 2004. The ubiquity and many roles of exopolymers (EPS) in aquatic systems. Sci. Mar. 68:13-21.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2006, p. 3026-3031, Vol. 72, No. 4
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.72.4.3026-3031.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.