Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2006, p. 4225-4231, Vol. 72, No. 6
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.00150-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Research Institute for Biological Sciences (RIBS), Okayama, 7549-1 Kibichuo-cho, Kaga-gun, Okayama 716-1241, Japan
Received 19 January 2006/ Accepted 12 April 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several metallopeptidases, such as thermolysin, synthesize peptides in organic solvents (6, 20, 24). Thermolysin prefers chemically N-protected peptides as substrates for hydrolysis, and therefore N-protected amino acids are used as acyl donors in dipeptide synthesis by thermolysin. Hence, deprotection is required to obtain a biologically active dipeptide. In addition, chemically N-protected amino acids are more expensive than free amino acids and their esters. Thus, from an economical point of view, N-protected amino acids are undesirable for use in the chemoenzymatic synthesis of biologically active dipeptides. Recently, Yokozeki and Hara have reported an efficient enzymatic method involving the aminolysis of ester bonds using a free amino acid and aminoacyl-OMe (38). This method is more cost-effective than the method using thermolysin and has the advantage of using an aqueous solution. Besides the method of Yokozeki and Hara, numerous methods using other enzymes, such as aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (19), D-alanine ligase (26), and nonribosomal peptide synthetases (14), have been developed. However, these enzymes are too expensive to be applied in the food and pharmaceutical industries. In addition, some biologically active dipeptides, such as TyrArg, AlaTyr, and ValTyr, cannot be synthesized by any of these methods. Thus, the development of a novel method for enzymatic peptide synthesis is crucial for the application of these biologically active dipeptides in the food and pharmaceutical industries.
Recently, we have identified a thermostable aminopeptidase (AP) that contains cocatalytic metallo-active sites and is secreted by Streptomyces septatus TH-2 (SSAP) and succeeded in overproducing it by using recombinant Escherichia coli (1). SSAP has a broad specificity toward peptides (2); however, this enzyme cannot hydrolyze N-protected peptides. Thus, we postulate that SSAP synthesizes a wide variety of dipeptides by using non-N-protected amino acids if SSAP has a function of reverse reaction. In this study, we first demonstrated that SSAP can synthesize dipeptides by using a free amino acid (acyl donor) and aminoacyl-OMe (acyl acceptor) in methanol (MeOH). Next, we investigated its specificity toward the acyl donor and acyl acceptor. Last, we demonstrated that SSAP can be applied to the synthesis of several biologically active peptides.
|
|
|---|
Preparation of purified SSAP.
Although a His6 tag sequence was fused to the C terminus of recombinant SSAP, it could not be purified by nickel-chelate chromatography. Thus, it was purified as follows. The crude enzyme preparation was brought to 80% saturation with ammonium sulfate. The precipitate obtained by centrifugation was dissolved in 10 mM Tris-HCl containing 1 mM CaCl2 (pH 8.0). It was then heated at 60°C for 30 min with occasional stirring. After centrifugation to remove the precipitate, the solution was dialyzed against 20 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The dialysate was passed through a hydroxyapatite column (Bio-Rad) equilibrated with the same buffer. The fractions were pooled and dialyzed against 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0). The dialysate was then loaded onto a Vivapure-Q spin column (Millipore) equilibrated with the same buffer. The bound protein was eluted with 0.2 M NaCl in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0). The eluates were pooled and dialyzed against 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0). The dialysate was used as a purified enzyme preparation.
Enzyme assay.
For routine assay, SSAP activity was determined by continuous spectrophotometric assay with Leu-pNA as the substrate. In the assay, 0.1 ml of 32 mM Leu-pNA was added to 0.9 ml of a mixture containing 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and the enzyme at 37°C. The increase in absorbance at 405 nm due to the release of p-nitroaniline per minute was monitored using a U2800 spectrophotometer (Hitachi). Initial hydrolytic activity was determined from the linear portion of the optical density profile (
405 = 10,600 M1 cm1) (27).
Dipeptide synthesis by SSAP.
Dipeptide synthesis by SSAP was performed as follows. Twenty microliters of SSAP solution (1 mg/ml) was suspended in 10 µl of 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) containing 200 mM amino acid. This suspension was placed in a 1.5-ml microtube, frozen by immersion in liquid nitrogen, and lyophilized with a FreeZone Freeze-Dry Systems model 7679520 (Labconco) at a vacuum of 0.3 hPa for 2 h. This lyophilized enzyme was used for dipeptide synthesis. The activity remained at 78% after lyophilization.
The reaction was initiated by adding 100 µl of 98% MeOH containing 50 mM aminoacyl-OMe to the lyophilized enzyme. The reaction was then continued with vigorous shaking (300 rpm) at 25°C for an appropriate time (20 min to 50 h). Because SSAP could not synthesize dipeptides in >99.8% MeOH solution, the reaction was terminated by adding 1.9 ml of 100% MeOH. After centrifugation, the reaction mixture was analyzed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) or high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
TLC.
One of the assay methods for dipeptide synthesis was TLC. Three microliters of the reaction mixture was applied to a TLC plate (60 F254; Merck) and developed with n-butanol-acetate-water (7:2:1, vol/vol) for approximately 1 h. Dipeptide, aminoacyl-OMe, and free amino acid were detected by spraying with 2.5% ninhydrin solution dissolved in acetone-water (1:1, vol/vol).
HPLC.
Dipeptides synthesized by SSAP were quantitated with an HPLC system (2690 Separation Module; Waters) equipped with a C18 reverse-phase column (Hydrosphere C18; YMC). The reaction mixture was filtered, and 10 µl of each sample was subjected to chromatography. Each sample was eluted with a solvent A-solvent B gradient of 75:25 to 0:100 for 15 min (1 ml/min), where solvent A was 20 mM KH2PO4 and solvent B was 100% MeOH, and detected by measuring absorbances at 210 and 280 nm with a 490E Programmable Multiwavelength Detector (Waters). The data were processed with the Millennium 32 computer program (Waters Chromatographic Division).
MS.
The molecular mass of each dipeptide synthesized by SSAP was determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) with an Autoflex II TOF/TOF (Bruker Daltonics). The dipeptides synthesized by SSAP were separated and desalted by HPLC under the conditions described in the subsection on HPLC, in which solvent A was substituted with Milli Q water. The separated dipeptides were then dried with a rotary evaporator (centrifugal concentrator model CC105; Tomy) for 2 h. We requested Bruker Daltonics to determine the molecular masses of the lyophilized products. For molecular mass number determination, we chose 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid as the MALDI matrix.
Other analytical procedures.
To confirm the composition of the dipeptides obtained, the alkaline and SSAP treatments of dipeptides were performed as follows. The synthesized dipeptides were separated by HPLC and then dried with a rotary evaporator. One hundred microliters of 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) containing 1 µg/ml SSAP or 100 µl of 0.1 M NaOH was added to the lyophilized dipeptides. The dissolved samples were then incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The samples treated with SSAP or alkali were then analyzed by HPLC.
Thermal stability analysis was performed by incubating 200 µl of an enzyme sample (20 µg/ml protein) in 98% MeOH between 4 and 65°C for 30 min. Residual activity was measured under the conditions described in the subsection on the enzyme assay. The effect of the substrate concentration on the reaction rate was examined with a reaction mixture containing 98% MeOH, 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 200 µg/ml SSAP, 0 to 32 mM free phenylalanine, and 0 to 160 mM Phe-OMe under the conditions described in the subsection on dipeptide synthesis by SSAP. To determine the effect of temperature, the reaction rate of dipeptide synthesis was determined at different temperatures. The stability of SSAP in 98% MeOH was determined by incubating 500 µl of an enzyme sample (20 µg/ml protein) in 98% MeOH at 25°C for an appropriate time. Residual activity was measured under the conditions described in the subsection on the enzyme assay.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. HPLC profile of product synthesized by SSAP. (A) HPLC of dipeptide synthesis by SSAP. Free phenylalanine at 50 mM and Phe-OMe at 50 mM were used as substrates. The reaction was performed by using 20 µg of SSAP with vigorous shaking at 25°C for 3 h. (B) HPLC of unknown product. The separated unknown product was treated with alkali or SSAP and then analyzed by HPLC. PhePhe was detected by the HPLC of the product treated with alkali, and free phenylalanine and a small amount of Phe-OMe were detected by treatment of the product with SSAP.
|
The MeOH concentration for dipeptide synthesis was investigated. The product PhePhe-OMe was efficiently synthesized in 90 to 98% MeOH. In 99% MeOH, the PhePhe-OMe production was lower than that in 98% MeOH, and PhePhe-OMe synthesis could not be observed in >99.8% MeOH (data not shown). In several organic solvents, including ethanol, isopropanol, and acetone, PhePhe-OMe was effectively synthesized. Of these solvents, MeOH was the most efficient for PhePhe-OMe synthesis (data not shown).
Arrangement of synthesized dipeptide.
To confirm the arrangement of the product, we chose two model reactions; one was performed with free phenylalanine and Trp-OMe, and the other was performed with free tryptophan and Phe-OMe. The resultant products were then treated with SSAP to confirm the composition. As shown in Fig. 2, the molecular mass of both products was 366 (Fig. 2A and C), indicating that both products were dipeptidyl-OMe composed of phenylalanine and tryptophan. By SSAP treatment, free phenylalanine and Trp-OMe were detected in the product synthesized from free phenylalanine and Trp-OMe (Fig. 2B), indicating that this product was PheTrp-OMe. In contrast, the components of the SSAP-treated product synthesized with free tryptophan and Phe-OMe were free tryptophan and Phe-OMe (Fig. 2D), indicating that this product was TrpPhe-OMe. These results indicate that a free amino acid and aminoacyl-OMe behave as an acyl donor and an acyl acceptor, respectively.
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Investigation of arrangement of dipeptide synthesized by SSAP. (A and B) HPLC and MS of product synthesized with free phenylalanine and Trp-OMe as substrates (A) and HPLC of this product treated with SSAP (B). The components of this product treated with SSAP were free phenylalanine and Trp-OMe. (C and D) HPLC and MS of product synthesized with free tryptophan and Phe-OMe as substrates (C) and HPLC of this product treated with SSAP (D). Free phenylalanine and Trp-OMe were detected with the treatment of this product with SSAP. In HPLC profiles, the peaks of phenylalanine and Phe-OMe are very small because the absorption coefficient of tryptophan at 210 nm is approximately fourfold higher than that of phenylalanine in this investigation.
|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Effect of substrate concentration on rate of dipeptide synthesis by SSAP. (A) Effect of acyl acceptor concentration. Free phenylalanine at 50 mM and Phe-OMe at 0 to 160 mM were used as the acyl donor and acyl acceptor, respectively. The reaction was performed by using 20 µg of SSAP with vigorous shaking at 25°C for 2 h. (B) Effect of acyl donor concentration. Free Phe at 0 to 32 mM and Phe-OMe at 50 mM were used as the acyl donor and acyl acceptor, respectively. The reaction was performed by using 20 µg of SSAP with vigorous shaking at 25°C for 2 h. Each value is the average of three independent experiments ± the standard deviation.
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Effects of temperature on stability and rate of dipeptide synthesis by SSAP. (A) Thermal stability of SSAP in aqueous solution and 98% MeOH. Each value is the average of five independent experiments ± the standard deviation. (B) Effect of temperature on dipeptide synthetic activity. Free phenylalanine at 20 mM and Phe-OMe at 50 mM were used as the acyl donor and acyl acceptor, respectively. The reaction was performed by using 20 µg of SSAP with vigorous shaking at an appropriate temperature for 1 h. Each value is the average of three independent experiments ± the standard deviation.
|
As shown in Fig. 5A, when 20 mM free phenylalanine and 50 mM Phe-OMe were used as substrates, PhePhe-OMe was efficiently synthesized until 6 h, and the quantity of PhePhe-OMe hardly increased after that. In contrast, a small peak was detected (9.3 min in HPLC) after 6 h, and the concentration of this unknown product slightly increased until 50 h. However, there was no increase in the concentration of the unknown product after 50 h (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 6, SSAP retained its activity after 100 h in 98% MeOH, indicating that the reaction equilibrium of dipeptide synthesis by SSAP was reached after 50 h. The rate of free phenylalanine conversion to PhePhe-OMe was 59.8% ± 1.5% when 20 mM free phenylalanine and 50 mM Phe-OMe were used. In contrast to the above results, an increase in the concentration of the unknown product was observed after 22 h with an increase in the quantity of free phenylalanine (50 mM) in the reaction mixture (Fig. 5B). The observed molecular mass of this product was 474, indicating that this product was PhePhePhe-OMe. This result indicates that PhePhe-OMe behaves as a good acyl donor.
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Investigation of reaction equilibrium. (A) Investigation of reaction equilibrium when 20 mM free phenylalanine and 50 mM Phe-OMe were used as substrates. The reaction was performed by using 20 µg of SSAP with vigorous shaking at 25°C for 1, 6, 22, and 50 h. (B) HPLC profile of product when 50 mM free phenylalanine and 50 mM Phe-OMe were used as substrates for dipeptide synthesis by SSAP. The reaction was performed by using 20 µg of SSAP with vigorous shaking at 25°C for 22 h. Intens., intensity; arb., arbitrary.
|
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Stability of SSAP in 98% MeOH. The enzyme sample (20 µg/ml protein) was incubated in 98% MeOH at 25°C for an appropriate time. Residual activity was measured under the conditions described in Materials and Methods. Each value is the average of five independent experiments ± the standard deviation.
|
As shown in Fig. 7, a high reaction rate is biased toward synthesis using acyl donors and acceptors that have bulky side chains. In addition, there was no synthesis when free cysteine was used as an acyl donor and His-OMe and Pro-OMe were used as acyl acceptors (Fig. 7). We consider that the nonsynthesis of PhePro-OMe is associated with the fact that SSAP cannot hydrolyze peptides whose penultimate residue is proline (2). Thus, we speculate that SSAP cannot hydrolyze peptides whose N-terminal residue is cysteine and whose penultimate residue is histidine.
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Substrate specificity of dipeptide synthesis by SSAP. (A) Specificity of SSAP toward acyl donor. (B) Specificity of SSAP toward acyl acceptor. In all cases, 20 mM free amino acid and 50 mM aminoacyl-OMe were used as the acyl donor and acyl acceptor, respectively. The reaction was performed by using 20 µg of SSAP with vigorous shaking at 25°C for 3 h. Each value is the average of three independent experiments ± the standard deviation.
|
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Synthesis of biologically active dipeptides AspPhe-OMe (A), ValTyr-OMe (B), AlaTyr-OMe (C), and AlaDOPA-OMe (D) by SSAP. In all cases, 20 mM free amino acid and 50 mM aminoacyl-OMe were used as the acyl donor and acyl acceptor, respectively. All panels show the HPLC profiles of the reaction mixture with (w/SSAP) and without (w/o SSAP) the enzyme for the comparison of dipeptide synthesis by SSAP with a negative control. The reaction was performed by using 20 µg of SSAP with vigorous shaking at 25°C for 24 h. (B, C and D) Under the HPLC conditions described in Materials and Methods, the DOPA-OMe and Tyr-OMe peaks formed a shoulder. The hydroxyl groups of the side chain of the substrates may be the cause of the shoulders near these peaks. Intens., intensity; arb., arbitrary.
|
As shown in Fig. 8B to D, all of the dipeptides were synthesized by SSAP in 98% MeOH. In these dipeptide syntheses, the conversion rates of free amino acids to dipeptides were above 25% (data not shown). Thus, SSAP is considered applicable to the synthesis of biologically active dipeptides. We further tried to synthesize ester-formed TyrArg by using free tyrosine and Arg-OMe; however, this opioid dipeptide could not be obtained (data not shown). We surmise that tyrosine and Arg-OMe cannot behave as a good acyl donor and a good acyl acceptor, respectively.
|
|
|---|
SSAP belongs to the M28 family, which includes bacterial and human enzymes that accommodate two zinc atoms in their active site. By using APs from Streptomyces griseus and Aeromonas proteolytica as authentic enzymes belonging to the M28 family, the catalytic mechanism of those APs has been extensively studied by structural analysis, inhibitory analysis, and site-directed mutagenesis (4, 8, 9, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 28). Thus, the catalytic mechanism of their hydrolytic activity is well known, and SSAP is considered to have the same catalytic mechanism as these enzymes. In this mechanism, a water molecule interacting with an acidic residue is considered to play a role in peptide bond hydrolysis as a nucleophile (17). Because dipeptide synthesis by SSAP occurred in more than 90% MeOH, we speculate that this reaction is due to the deprivation of water molecules, which act as nucleophiles in peptide hydrolysis, caused by the high concentration of MeOH, and the
-amino group of the acyl acceptor behaves as a nucleophile instead of the water molecules under our conditions of dipeptide synthesis by SSAP; however, these remain to be clarified. In addition, an aspect of the mechanism requires further elucidation: SSAP's preference for aminoacyl-OMe as an acyl acceptor.
Compared with known enzymes used for dipeptide synthesis (14, 19, 27, 36, 38), SSAP gave a broad substrate specificity, indicating that it can produce various dipeptides, including several biologically active dipeptides (Fig. 7 and 8). SSAP also shows broad substrate specificities toward peptides and aminoacyl derivatives in terms of hydrolytic activity (1, 2). In particular, SSAP prefers to hydrolyze peptides that have hydrophobic bulky side chains. Similarly, SSAP shows efficient dipeptide synthesis using both acyl donors and acyl acceptors that have bulky side chains. Thus, in dipeptide synthesis by SSAP, peptides that act as good substrates in hydrolysis are appropriate targets of a reverse reaction. This phenomenon is, in effect, the same as the reverse reaction by thermolysin (23, 25).
In this study, we demonstrated that SSAP can be applied to the synthesis of various dipeptides. However, it could not synthesize TyrArg, an opioid dipeptide (31). To perform more convenient dipeptide synthesis, it is crucial to alter the specificities of SSAP toward acyl donors and acyl acceptors. In our recent studies, to make SSAP a convenient biocatalyst for the synthesis of pharmaceuticals, we succeeded in altering its substrate specificity by site-directed mutagenesis (3, 5). In these investigations, we obtained several mutants with high hydrolytic activities toward artificial substrates such as aminoacyl-OMe and aminoacyl amide. However, the hydrolytic activities of these mutants toward peptides are lower than that of wild-type SSAP (3). We previously demonstrated that the specificity toward the N-terminal residue of bacterial APs is affected by the penultimate residue, flanking moiety, and length of peptide substrate (2). From this study, it is suggested that there is a region in bacterial APs associated with the recognition of the penultimate residue of peptide substrates. However, details of this region are unclear. Further study of the recognition of the penultimate residue by SSAP is needed to improve SSAP dipeptide synthesis.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»