Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2006, p. 4446-4449, Vol. 72, No. 6
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.01924-05
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Inactivation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in Cow's Milk by Means of High Hydrostatic Pressure at Mild Temperatures
Tomás López-Pedemonte,1
Iker Sevilla,2
Joseba M. Garrido,2
Gorka Aduriz,2
Buenaventura Guamis,1
Ramón A. Juste,2 and
Artur X. Roig-Sagués1*
Centre Especial de Recerca Planta de Tecnologia dels Aliments, CeRTA, XiT, Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain,1
Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo Agrario (NEIKER), Berreaga, 1, 48160 Derio, Bizkaia, Spain2
Received 15 August 2005/
Accepted 26 March 2006

ABSTRACT
Two strains of
Mycobacterium avium subsp.
paratuberculosis (3644/02
and ATCC 19698) were inoculated (approximately 6 log CFU/ml)
into sterilized milk to evaluate inactivation by high hydrostatic
pressure. Reductions of
M. avium subsp.
paratuberculosis increased
with pressure level. Significant differences were also found
between
M. avium subsp.
paratuberculosis strains and between
the media used. Average reductions of 4 log CFU/ml after treatment
with 500 MPa are comparable to those caused by thermal treatments.

INTRODUCTION
Paratuberculosis (Johne's disease) is a chronic granulomatous
enteritis caused by
Mycobacterium avium subspecies
paratuberculosis that affects cattle and other ruminants. Its prevalence in food-producing
animals is increasing globally, causing significant financial
losses (
17). Crohn's disease is a chronic regional enteritis
affecting around 5 per 100,000 humans in developed countries
(
3,
7,
8). Due to the clinical and pathological similarities
between the diseases, involvement of
M. avium subsp.
paratuberculosis in the etiology of Crohn's disease has been debated for many
years. The introduction of specific PCR together with optimized
processing procedures significantly increased the implication
of
M. avium subsp.
paratuberculosis in disease causation (
6,
7,
17,
18). Milk could be a potential vehicle of transmission
of
M. avium subsp.
paratuberculosis from animals with Johne's
disease to humans. The presence of
M. avium subsp.
paratuberculosis DNA in human patients without symptoms of inflammatory bowel
disease suggests that this widespread bacterium is present in
contaminated water, milk, and other sources (
4,
23). Recent
reports add evidence to this hypothesis and include the isolation
of
M. avium subsp.
paratuberculosis from breast milk and intestinal
and lymph nodes from patients with Crohn's disease. Viable
M. avium subsp.
paratuberculosis has also been detected in peripheral
blood in a substantial proportion of individuals with Crohn's
disease (
18,
22,
23,
29,
30). The dairy industry is also concerned
about
M. avium subsp.
paratuberculosis due to reports that suggest
it may not be effectively inactivated by high-temperature, short-time
pasteurization (72°C, 15 s). There is controversy regarding
this particular issue, although differences in inactivation
may be explained by different pasteurization times and equipment,
different detection methods and selective media, separation
of clumps, different initial loads, variation in heat sensitivity
between
M. avium subsp.
paratuberculosis strains, and the use
of freshly isolated or laboratory-adapted strains of
M. avium subsp.
paratuberculosis (
5,
15,
16,
19).
In the last 15 years, treatment of milk and dairy products with high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) has been the subject of intensive research (24, 36), mostly involving gram-positive or -negative cells. However, acid-resistant microorganisms such as Mycobacterium spp. have never been included in these studies. Our objective was to determine the possibility of reducing counts of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis in milk by means of moderate HHP treatments carried out at mild temperatures.

Strains and preparation of inocula.
The strains used were
Mycobacterium avium subsp.
paratuberculosis ATCC 19698 and
Mycobacterium avium subsp.
paratuberculosis 3644/02,
a Neiker isolate from a natural case of clinical paratuberculosis
in cattle, determined to be of cattle type (C) by IS
1311 PCR-restriction
endonuclease analysis (
20) and of type [1-1] according to pulsed-field
gel electrophoresis analysis (
32). Both strains were grown in
Middlebrook 7H9 broth (Difco, Detroit, MI) supplemented with
Middlebrook oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase enrichment
(Becton, Dickinson and Company, MD) and 0.05% Tween 80 (Panreac
Quimica SA, Barcelona, Spain) (7H9 medium) for 6 and 12 weeks,
and then the MacFarland scale (Densimat; Bio-Mérieux,
Marcy l'Etoile, France) was used to estimate cell concentration.
The final inoculums were 8.5 log CFU/ml and 8.6 log CFU/ml for
strains 3644/02 and 19698, respectively.

Inoculation.
Sixteen 30-ml aliquots of ultra-high-temperature-treated milk
were inoculated with 1 ml of each strain suspension. Afterwards,
the milk was dispensed in sterile, hermetic, 30-ml low-density
polyethylene bottles (Azlon; Bibby Sterilin, Ltd., United Kingdom)
and vacuum packed in a triple layer of plastic bags (bb4.l;
Cryovac Packaging, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain). Inoculated
samples were stored at 6 ± 2°C.

HHP treatments.
Milk samples were pressurized 24 h after inoculation by using
discontinuous HHP equipment (model S-FL-850-9-W; Stansted Fluid
Power, Stansted, United Kingdom). On each run, two milk samples
were placed inside the product canister. They were stabilized
at the required temperature (5 or 20°C) and then immediately
subjected to 10 min of HHP treatment at 300, 400, or 500 MPa
(as measured on the digital and analogue pressure indicators).
Control samples not subjected to HHP (0.1 MPa) were used as
the reference for initial
M. avium subsp.
paratuberculosis counts.
The time of pressure buildup was 24 s per 100 MPa; the decompression
time was 30 to 35 s.

Microbiological analysis.
At 24 h after pressurization, microbiological analysis was carried
out. After vigorous shaking, a 1-ml aliquot of each treated
spiked milk sample was diluted in 9 ml of sterile distilled
water. Further 10-fold dilutions up to 1:100,000 were made for
each aliquot. Then, 0.2 ml of four dilutions (1:1, 1:10, 1:1,000,
and 1:100,000) were inoculated onto two tubes of Herrold's egg
yolk medium (HEY) supplemented with 2 µg/ml of mycobactin
J (Allied Monitor, Inc., Fayette, MO) and onto another two tubes
of agar-solidified 7H9 (Bacto Agar; Becton, Dickinson and Company,
MD) and incubated at 37°C. Colonies of
M. avium subsp.
paratuberculosis were counted after an incubation period of 16 weeks. Some tubes
were discarded due to contamination or desiccation during the
incubation period. An aliquot of similarly treated, uninoculated
ultra-high-temperature-treated milk and pressurization liquid
were used as negative controls.

Statistical analysis.
Colony counts per tube were transformed into number of CFU in
the original milk sample. This calculated inoculum value was
assigned to all tubes with 100 colonies or more because confluent
growth made individual colony count beyond this number impossible.
Only dilutions with different counts in at least two levels
of pressure were used for statistical analysis after logarithmic
transformation. This resulted in using dilutions of 1/1, 1/10,
and 1/1,000 on both media for strain 3644/02 and dilutions of
1/1,000 and 1/100,000 on 7H9 and of 1/1 and 1/10 on HEY for
strain 19698. The general linear models procedure of the SAS
System version 8.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) was used to
test main effects of strain, pressure, temperature, and culture
medium, as well as their interactions, on the final colony count
logarithm. A Dunnett test was used to assess the significance
of differences between the control level and each other level
of each main factor, and a Tukey-Kramer multirange test was
used for testing the differences between paired-interaction
marginal means.
The overall analysis of variance including all effects and interactions showed that strain (P < 0.0006), culture medium (P < 0.0001), and pressure (P < 0.0001) had strong effects on the colony counts. However, the assayed temperature levels had no significant effects (P = 0.2783), and therefore this effect was eliminated from further statistical analysis (data not shown). As can be deduced from Table 1, observing data for both strains and culture media, 300-, 400-, and 500-MPa treatments caused significant (P < 0.05) reductions of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis counts of 0.92, 1.59, and 4.58 log CFU/ml, respectively, compared to control samples as determined by the Dunnett test. Strain 3644/02 had an average recovery of 4.54 log CFU/ml, which was 1.68 log CFU/ml higher than the recovery of strain 19698 (P < 0.05), independently of other factors. For both strains and all pressures, the tubes of 7H9 medium had a recovery rate 1.72 log CFU/ml higher than those of HEY medium. However, there was a strong interaction between strain and culture medium (P < 0.0001); nonsignificant differences in recovery occurred for strain 3644/02 in both media (5.01 log CFU/ml on 7H9 versus 4.24 log CFU/ml on HEY, for all pressures), while very few colonies of strain 19698 grew on HEY compared to 7H9 medium (4.49 versus 1.27 log CFU/ml, respectively). Therefore, another analysis was carried out, considering only results on 7H9 for strain and pressure factors. This analysis confirmed the significant differences between control and 500-MPa-treated samples for both strains (4.85 log CFU/ml; P < 0.05), but this was not the case for the other two pressure levels. The analysis of interactions further supported this result, since the differences between control and 500-MPa-treated samples were 4.07 log CFU/ml (P = 0.01) and 5.20 log CFU/ml (P < 0.001) for strains 3644/02 and 19698, respectively (Table 1).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1. HHP treatment effects on counts of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis strains 3644/02 and 19698 in different culture mediaa
|
The counts of
M. avium subsp.
paratuberculosis obtained at 5°C
were similar to those obtained at 20°C. This fact turns
out to be very useful, since it means that mild HHP treatments
could be applied to milk at refrigeration temperatures, thus
minimizing organoleptic and nutritional alteration. As can be
seen in Table
1, HHP inactivation of both strains of
M. avium subsp.
paratuberculosis was proportional to the increase in
the pressure applied, an effect which was also observed in both
culture media. This is generally the tendency observed among
vegetative bacteria (
12,
31). However, there were strong interactions
between strain and medium, which indicate that assay conditions
are very important for the assessment of inactivation of
M. avium subsp.
paratuberculosis. This was quite evident for strain
19698 in HEY, where even the counts of control samples were
reduced by 4.12 log CFU/ml relative to their growth on 7H9 (Table
1). In contrast, strain 3644/02 grew similarly in both media.
Preference of different strains of
M. avium subsp.
paratuberculosis for primary isolation media has been observed before (
1).
Different piezotolerances between strains of the same species have been observed by many researchers (2, 9, 27). From the way that both M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis strains responded to HHP treatments, it seems that strain 3644/02 was slightly more pressure resistant than strain 19698.
The mean reduction obtained for strain 3644/02 at 500 MPa was 4.07 log CFU/ml. This value suggests the possibility of inactivating this microorganism by means of HHP when its load in raw milk is less than 4 log CFU/ml. Many authors estimate that raw bulk tank milk could reach levels of up to 4 and 5 log CFU/ml of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis cells (11, 13, 14, 16, 21, 25, 34). This is mostly due to fecal contamination and also, to a lesser extent, to cells secreted within the udders (5, 33, 35); Sweeney et al. (35) found 2 to 8 CFU/ml (0.3 to 0.9 log CFU/ml) of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis cells in milk samples aseptically obtained from the udders of nine subclinical animals.
Nevertheless, HHP inactivation values are comparable to those obtained in pasteurization studies (11, 17) and to those obtained with pulsed electric fields (28), but they have the advantage of using relatively lower temperatures. It is still possible to apply pressures higher than 500 MPa to raw milk. HHP technology could also be applied to soft-curd cheeses traditionally made from raw milk in order to improve its safety. The work of Donaghy et al. (10) states that M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis cells survive short-term curing when present in high (up to 5 log CFU/ml) or low (2 log CFU/ml) numbers as well. Due to the isostatic condition of HHP treatments (which means that pressure is homogeneously applied to every point of the sample), large differences are not expected when larger samples and HHP machines are used. However, aggregated M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis cells could still interfere and modify the reductions obtained. Moreover, temperature gradients due to the adiabatic heating of the pressure chamber may vary in laboratory and industrial equipment. This is why pilot-scale experiments such as those made with pasteurization treatments (15, 26) may be useful. Further research should be done in order to determine the nature of HHP injuries in this sort of vegetative cell and to evaluate the behavior of pressurized M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis cells during storage life at refrigeration temperatures.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Iker Sevilla held a fellowship from the Department of Industry
and the Department of Education, Universities and Research of
the Basque Government.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Facultat de Veterinària, Edifici V, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain. Phone: (34) 935811460. Fax: (34) 935811494. E-mail:
arturxavier.roig{at}uab.es.


REFERENCES
1 - Adúriz, J. J., R. A. Juste, and N. Cortabarria. 1995. Lack of mycobactin dependence of mycobacteria isolated on Middlebrook 7H11 from clinical cases of ovine paratuberculosis. Vet. Microbiol. 45:211-217.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Alpas, H., N. Kalchayanand, F. Bozoglu, A. Sikes, C. P. Dunne, and B. Ray. 1999. Variation in resistance to high hydrostatic pressure among strains of food-borne pathogens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:4248-4251.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Anonymous. 2000. Possible links between Crohn's disease and paratuberculosis. Report of the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Welfare. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
4 - Argueta, C., S. Yoder, A. E. Holtzman, T. W. Aronson, N. Glover, O. G. W. Berlin, G. N. Stelma, J. R. S. Froman, and P. Tomaser. 2000. Isolation and identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria from foods as possible exposure sources. J. Food Prot. 63:930-933.[Medline]
5 - Ayele, W. Y., P. Svastova, P. Roubal, M. Bartos, and I. Pavlik. 2005. Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis cultured from locally and commercially pasteurised cow's milk in the Czech Republic. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:1210-1214.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Bull, T. J., E. J. McMinn, K. Sidi-Boumedine, A. Skull, D. Durkin, P. Neild, G. Rhodes, R. Pickup, and J. Hermon-Taylor. 2003. Detection and verification of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in fresh ileocolonic mucosal biopsy specimens from individuals with and without Crohn's disease. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41:2915-2923.
7 - Chacon, O., L. E. Bermudez, and R. G. Barletta. 2004. Johne's disease, inflamatory bowel disease, and Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 58:329-363.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 - Chamberlain, W., D. Y. Graham, K. Hulten, H. M. El-Zimalty, M. R. Schwartz, S. Naser, I. Shafran, and F. A. K. El-Zaatari. 2001. Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis as one cause of Crohn's disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 15:337-346.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 - De Lamo-Castellví, S., M. Capellas, T. López-Pedemonte, M. M. Hernández-Herrero, B. Guamis, and A. X. Roig-Sagués. 2005. Behavior of Yersinia enterocolitica strains inoculated in model cheese treated with high hydrostatic pressure. J. Food Prot. 68:528-533.[Medline]
10 - Donaghy, J. A., N. L. Totton, and M. T. Rowe. 2004. Persistence of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis during manufacture and ripening of cheddar cheese. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:4899-4905.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Gao, A., L. Mutharia, S. Chen, K. Rahn, and J. Odumeru. 2002. Effect of pasteurization on survival of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in milk. J. Dairy Sci. 85:3198-3205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Gervilla, R., E. Sendra, V. Ferragut, and B. Guamis. 1999. Sensitivity of Staphylococcus aureus and Lactobacillus helveticus in ovine milk subjected to high hydrostatic pressure. J. Dairy Sci. 82:1099-1107.[Medline]
13 - Grant, I. R., H. J. Ball, and M. T. Rowe. 1998. Effect of high temperature short time pasteurisation on milk containing low numbers of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 26:166-170.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 - Grant, I. R., H. J. Ball, S. D. Neill, and M. T. Rowe. 1996. Inactivation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in cow's milk at pasteurization temperatures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:631-636.[Abstract]
15 - Grant, I. R., I. Hitchings, A. McCartney, F. Ferguson, and M. T. Rowe. 2002. Effect of commercial-scale high-temperature, short-time pasteurization on the viability of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in naturally infected cows' milk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:602-607.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16 - Grant, I. R., M. T. Rowe, L. Dundee, and E. Hitchings. 2001. Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis: its incidence, heat resistance and detection in milk and dairy products. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 54:2-14.[CrossRef]
17 - Greenstein, R. J. 2003. Is Crohn's disease caused by a Mycobacterium? Comparisons with leprosy, tuberculosis, and Johne's disease. Lancet Infect. Dis. 3:507-514.[CrossRef][Medline]
18 - Hermon-Taylor, J., T. J. Bull, J. M. Sheridan, J. Cheng, M. L. Stellakis, and N. Sumar. 2000. Causation of Crohn's disease by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Can. J. Gastroenterol. 14:521-539.[Medline]
19 - Lund, B. M., G. W. Gould, and A. M. Rampling. 2002. Pasteurization of milk and the heat resistance of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis: a critical review of the data. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 77:135-145.[Medline]
20 - Marsh, I., R. J. Whittington, and D. Cousins. 1999. PCR-restriction endonuclease analysis for identification and strain typing of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium based on polymorphisms in IS1311. Mol. Cell Probes 13:115-126.[CrossRef][Medline]
21 - Meylan, M., D. M. Rings, W. P. Shulaw, J. J. Kowalski, S. Bech-Nielsen, and G. F. Hoffsis. 1996. Survival of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis and preservation of immunoglobulin G in bovine calostrum under experimental conditions simulating pasteurization. Am. J. Vet. Res. 57:1580-1585.[Medline]
22 - Naser, S. A., D. Schwartz, and I. Shafran. 2000. Isolation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis from breast milk of Crohn's disease patients. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 95:1094-1095.[CrossRef][Medline]
23 - Naser, S. A., G. Ghobrial, C. Romero, and J. F. Valentine. 2004. Culture of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis from the blood of patients with Crohn's disease. Lancet 364:1039-1044.[CrossRef][Medline]
24 - O'Reilly, C. E., A. L. Kelly, P. M. Murphy, and T. P. Beresford. 2001. High pressure treatment: application in cheese manufacture and ripening. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 12:51-59.[CrossRef]
25 - O'Reilly, C. E., L. O'Connor, W. Anderson, P. Harvey, I. R. Grant, J. Donaghy, M. Rowe, and P. O'Mahony. 2004. Surveillance of bulk raw and commercially pasteurized cows' milk from approved Irish liquid-milk pasteurization plants to determine the incidence of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:5138-5144.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26 - Pearce, L. E., H. Tuan Truong, R. A. Crawford, G. F. Yates, S. Cavaignac, and G. W. de Lisle. 2001. Effect of turbulent-flow pasteurization on survival of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis added to raw milk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:3964-3969.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27 - Ritz, M., F. Jugiau, F. Rama, P. Courcoux, M. Semenou, and M. Federighi. 2000. Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes by high hydrostatic pressure: effects and interactions of treatment variables studied by analysis of variance. Food Microbiol. 17:375-382.[CrossRef]
28 - Rowan, N. J., S. J. MacGregor, J. G. Anderson, D. Cameron, and O. Farish. 2001. Inactivation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis by pulsed electric fields. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:2833-2836.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29 - Schwartz, D., I. Shafran, and C. Romero. 2000. Use of short term culture for identification of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in tissue from Crohn's disease patients. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 6:303-307.[CrossRef][Medline]
30 - Selby, W. S. 2004. Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis bacteraemia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Lancet 364:1013-1014.[CrossRef][Medline]
31 - Smelt, J. P. P. M. 1998. Recent advances in the microbiology of high pressure processing. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 9:152-158.
32 - Stevenson, K., V. M. Hughes, L. de Juan, N. F. Inglis, F. Wright, and J. M. Sharp. 2002. Molecular characterization of pigmented and nonpigmented isolates of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1798-1804.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33 - Streeter, R. N., G. F. Hoffsis, S. Bech-Nielsen, W. P. Shulaw, and D. M. Rings. 1995. Isolation of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis from colostrums and milk of subclinically infected cows. Am. J. Vet. Res. 56:1322-1324.[Medline]
34 - Sung, N., and M. T. Collins. 1998. Thermal tolerance of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis cultured from milk and supramammary lymph nodes of infected asymptomatic cows. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:999-1005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35 - Sweeney, R. W., R. H. Whitlock, and A. E. Rosenberger. 1992. Mycobacterium paratuberculosis cultured from milk and supramammary lymph nodes of infected asymptomatic cows. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:166-171.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36 - Trujillo, A. J., M. Capellas, J. Saldo, R. Gervilla, and B. Guamis. 2002. Applications of high-hydrostatic pressure on milk and dairy products: a review. Innovative Food Sci. Tecnol. 3:295-307.[CrossRef]
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2006, p. 4446-4449, Vol. 72, No. 6
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.01924-05
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Wong, S. Y. Y., Grant, I. R., Friedman, M., Elliott, C. T., Situ, C.
(2008). Antibacterial Activities of Naturally Occurring Compounds against Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 5986-5990
[Abstract]
[Full Text]