Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2006, p. 4713-4716, Vol. 72, No. 7
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.00894-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Departamento de Microbiología, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru,1 Asociación Benéfica PRISMA, Lima, Peru,2 Department of International Health, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland,3 Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri,4 Department of Molecular Microbiology and Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri5
Received 16 April 2006/ Accepted 20 April 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), or arbitrarily primed PCR, method has been valuable for studies of H. pylori genetic diversity and transmission (2, 3, 11, 16). This method entails PCR amplification with one or more oligonucleotide primers (one primer per amplification reaction) that do not strongly match particular sites in target bacterial genomes and the use of low-stringency conditions for primer-template annealing (21, 23). Most current RAPD protocols use primers that are just 10 nucleotides (nt) long, a legacy of the early 1990s when oligonucleotide synthesis was very costly and large oligonucleotide libraries were being screened to find primers that gave "good" RAPD profiles (2, 4, 7, 10, 21, 22, 23). Approximately 3 to 10 discrete DNA fragments are typically obtained per H. pylori strain with any such good primer (2), and each independent H. pylori isolate typically yields a fragment pattern that is reproducibly different from those of other isolates. Important to this method's success are (i) low- stringency conditions to allow priming of DNA synthesis wherever just a few bases at the primer's 3' end match sequences in target DNA; (ii) amplification when pairs of such fortuitous binding sites are near each other (<
3 kb apart) in genomic DNA; (iii) efficient continued amplification of products generated in the first rounds; and (iv) differences among strains in the distribution of such sites and, hence, of the arrays of products amplified from them. The arrays of PCR products obtained vary with the strain tested and thus distinguish individual strains from one another. Several longer primers that were first designed for gene-specific PCR from other species also gave robust and informative RAPD profiles in early studies (2, 21, 22). They have not been used much since then, however, in part because useful data had been obtained with 10-nt primers.
A cDNA fingerprinting strategy, developed initially for enteric species such as Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, was based on the discovery of a family of repetitive sequences, two or more copies of which occur between many pairs of neighboring genes (8, 20). PCR with outward-facing 22-nt-long primers specific for these enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) sequences yielded arrays of products that also differed among strains, nominally because of differences in the underlying distribution and spacing of ERIC sequences (20). The conditions used for ERIC fingerprinting are only moderately stringent: annealing at 45 or 49°C in recent H. pylori studies (9, 18), whereas the calculated melting temperature for ERIC primers is
61°C. The low stringency used for H. pylori probably allows priming of DNA synthesis from fortuitously matched (non-ERIC) sites in genomic DNAs, much as in RAPD-PCR with longer primers.
The use of ERIC fingerprinting to distinguish unrelated Swedish H. pylori strains from one another (18) and for phylogenetic analyses of DNAs from several sources (9) led us to compare the robustness and discriminatory power of ERIC versus RAPD tests for detecting mixed infections with strains that are closely related genetically. We found that three RAPD tests, each with a different 10-nt primer, were needed to achieve the discriminatory power of one ERIC test and that at least half of infected shantytown residents carried more than one H. pylori strain.
|
|
|---|
ERIC-PCR fingerprinting.
ERIC-PCR fingerprinting was carried out essentially as recommended previously (9, 18, 20) in a PTC-100 instrument (MJ Research, Inc.). The 20-µl reaction volumes contained 1x PCR buffer (Invitrogen), 2 mM MgCl2 (Invitrogen), 80 µM deoxynucleoside triphosphates (Invitrogen), 0.5 µM concentrations each of the forward and reverse primers, 2 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen), 0.1 µg of bovine serum albumin (pH 7.0; ICN Biomedicals)/µl, the ERIC primers 5'-ATGTAAGCTCCTGGGGATTCAC-3' and 5'-AAGTAAGTGACTGGGGTGAGCG-3', and 5 ng of genomic DNA per reaction (after initial test results showed identical banding patterns with 5, 9, and 20 ng of DNA per reaction). The following cycling conditions were used: 5 min at 94°C for initial denaturation; 35 cycles of 30 s at 90°C, 1 min at 49°C, and 5 min at 70°C; and then a final extension for 10 min at 70°C. After PCR, 3 µl of gel loading buffer (0.1% bromophenol blue, 50% glycerol) was mixed with each amplified product, and 15 µl of the mixture was loaded onto a 1% agarose gel containing 0.5 µg ethidium bromide/µl in 1x TAE buffer (40 mM Tris-acetate, 1 mM EDTA [pH 8.0]). A 1-kb DNA ladder (Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) was used as a size marker. The gels were photographed under UV light after electrophoresis to record results and visually compare isolates and thus test for diversity within each given patient. We did not rigorously compare isolates from different patients, which generally are not related to one another (2). Reproducibility was monitored when warranted by comparing the results of ERICs carried out with the same samples on different days.
RAPD fingerprinting.
RAPD fingerprinting was carried out essentially as recommended elsewhere (2) in a PTC-100 instrument. Each 25-µl volume contained 1x PCR buffer (Invitrogen), 4 mM MgCl2 (Invitrogen), 0.25 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates (Invitrogen), 0.1 µg of bovine serum albumin/µl (pH 7.0; ICN Biomedicals), 1.2 U Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen), an 0.8 µM concentration of one of four RAPD primers, i.e., 1254 (5'-CCGCAGCCAA-3'), 1281 (5'-AACGCGCAAC-3'), 1283 (5'-GCGATCCCCA-3'), or 1290 (5'-GTGGATGCGA-3'), and 9 ng of genomic DNA (after control tests showed that the patterns obtained did not depend on DNA concentration in the range of 5 to 20 ng per 25-µl reaction). The following conditions were used for 45 cycles: 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 36°C, and then 1 min at 72°C. Products were electrophoresed and photographed under UV light, as for the ERIC analyses.
Gel analysis and ERIC-RAPD comparison.
The uniqueness of each patient's fingerprint was assessed by comparing the banding patterns generated with DNAs from single colonies or pools of colonies and noting differences in band number and size. Pools and single colonies were scored as the "same" if they yielded identical profiles and scored as "similar or related" if just one band differed among profiles (see Fig. 1). Isolates with two or more band differences per seven bands scored on average were considered "different or unrelated." ERIC designations were based on the single ERIC primer pair used. RAPD designations were based on four assays. Blind RAPD and ERIC comparisons were performed separately in order to ensure that there was no analyst (subjectivity) bias. The correlation of ERIC and RAPD data was analyzed by using a kappa statistic (SPSS, Chicago, IL).
![]() View larger version (102K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. ERIC and two RAPD profiles representative of isolates from one person's mixed infection by closely related but nonidentical H. pylori strains (lanes 1 and 5 versus other lanes). As indicated by the arrows in ERIC and RAPD 1290 fingerprints, no more than one of the multiple bands observed in a given profile varied among these isolates; sometimes no difference was detectable (RAPD primer 1283).
|
|
|
|---|
To assess genetic diversity among isolates recovered from a given patient and the power of the ERIC versus RAPD methods to distinguish closely related strains, we cultured H. pylori from 63 Peruvian residents of a Lima region shantytown and fingerprinted five representative single colony isolates and also pools of at least six additional colonies from each study participant. In 35 of 63 cases (56%), the ERIC profiles from each single colony isolate and the pool were identical. In 16 cases (25%), one or more colonies differed reproducibly from the others by one band, as illustrated in Fig. 1 (top frame). This suggested carriage of a mixture of related but not identical strains. In the remaining 12 cases (19%), ERIC profiles from at least one colony differed from others by at least two bands, suggesting distinct strains.
Similar conclusions emerged from RAPD tests of the same DNAs: no differences among the five single colony isolates or the pool were found with 33 of the 63 participants (52%), slight differences were found with one or more RAPD primers with 18 participants (29%), and quite different profiles were obtained with 12 participants (19%). There was 94% agreement between classifications based on results from one ERIC test versus four RAPD tests (each with a different primer) of sets of isolates as uniform, versus closely related but not identical, versus probably unrelated, indicating a high kappa statistic of 0.8942.
The sensitivity of an individual RAPD test varied, however, with the RAPD primer used. For example, of the 30 samples interpreted as not identical based on data from tests with all four RAPD primers (one primer per test), 22 (73%) and 21 (70%) were thus identified with the primers 1254 or 1281, respectively, whereas only 14 (47%) and 11 (37%) were thus identified with the primers 1283 and 1290, respectively. Combinations of the best two and three primers gave 26/30 (87%) and 30/30 (100%) agreement, respectively, with interpretations based on all four primers. The apparent complexity of a subject's H. pylori population was not related to whether the bacteria had been cultured from biopsy versus from string test samples.
|
|
|---|
20% of a person's H. pylori population would often have been missed, since we analyzed just five single colonies and a pool of colonies from each participant. About one-third of mixed infections (12 of 31) involved strains that differed in multiple bands and thus were likely unrelated and acquired from different sources. This abundance fits with data from an eradication trial (16), indicating that the risk of new infection in this community is >15% per person per year, far higher than the <1% per person per year estimated for adults in North America or western Europe. The other mixed infections involved strains that seemed closely related, in that no more than one of the multiple bands observed in a given profile varied among isolates. Many such polymorphic bands may stem from plasmid transfer or chromosomal recombination between unrelated and potentially transient strains, which generally involves the transfer of a few kilobases or less from donor to recipient, and selection for recombinants with improved fitness (6, 11); recombination between duplicate and divergent sequences within the genome and mutation without recombination can also underlie certain individual cases (4). These alternatives can be distinguished by DNA sequencing, focusing initially on individual polymorphic bands (11). The high quality and discriminatory ability of ERIC profiling encourage the use of this method for analyses of H. pylori diversity, transmission, persistence, and virulence. Indeed, we imagine that with H. pylori, ERIC and standard RAPD fingerprinting are equivalent in terms of underlying target specificity. It is instructive in this context that we found no significant homology between H. pylori genome sequences and either canonical E. coli ERIC sequences or the 22-nt-long primers used for ERIC profiling (8, 20). This is in accord with the very different placements of E. coli and H. pylori in the proteobacteria (gamma versus epsilon phylogenetic groups, respectively). The robustness of ERIC fingerprinting may reflect the length of the primers used (22 nt), which allows high-efficiency priming of further amplification from products of any earlier ERIC amplification cycle; well-chosen long RAPD primers (2) might offer equivalent robustness and sensitivity. We conclude that one ERIC amplification is equivalent to several RAPD tests in reliability and sensitivity and, accordingly, that use of the ERIC protocol allows significant labor and financial savings without a loss in sensitivity or reliability when many samples are to be analyzed.
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»