Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2006, p. 5159-5164, Vol. 72, No. 8
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.00601-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Hauke Harms,4
Gianfranco Novarino,3 and
Antonis Chatzinotas4
Institute for Limnology, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Mondseestr. 9, A-5310 Mondsee, Austria,1 Natural Environment Research Council, British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, United Kingdom,2 The Natural History Museum, Department of Zoology, Protista and Mathematics Division, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom,3 UFZ Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig-Halle, Department of Environmental Microbiology, Permoserstrasse 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany4
Received 14 March 2006/ Accepted 8 May 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The basic assumption that microorganisms are easily dispersed across the physical and geographic barriers that halt the migrations of larger animals and plants (12) is, however, controversial and relies largely on the observed ubiquity of morphospecies. It has been challenged by other researchers, who believe that protists have a biogeography that has been shaped by geographic barriers (8, 30). The discussion has initiated much recent research into the existence of endemic species (10, 16, 28, 38). However, even the definition of a species is controversial, and the low resolution of the morphospecies concept for protists appears to be an obstacle to the settling of the debate (32).
Fortunately, increasing evidence for phylogenetic and ecophysiological differentiation below the morphospecies level (4, 21, 22, 26, 29, 38) can theoretically be used to solve the question of possible endemism among protists. If there were no geographic barriers to protists, correlations between the habitat temperature, as a factor selecting certain strains from the seed bank, and the temperature tolerance of these strains should be independent of the geographic location. To critically test the temperature adaptation of a flagellate morphospecies, we analyzed 54 strains for their phylogenetic relationship and maximum growth temperatures, the latter as a characteristic that is easily measurable and likely subject to evolutionary adaptation to local conditions. Particular attention was paid to isolates from the geographically most isolated sites, on the Antarctic continent.
|
|
|---|
Samples originating from terrestrial and aquatic habitats in polar, temperate, subtropical, and tropical regions (Fig. 1A and B) were collected. Samples were transported to the laboratory in sealed tubes and processed immediately upon arrival. All treatments after sampling were carried out under aseptic conditions. Flagellates were isolated by serial dilution using either sterile filtrated water from the sampling site or artificial media following an acclimatization approach (4). The flagellates were counted using a Sedgewick-Rafter chamber, and a subsample was diluted to a final flagellate abundance of 0.5 to 1 flagellate ml1 and subsequently transferred to 24-well cell culture plates. Wells were supplemented with food bacteria at a concentration of 3 x 106 to 5 x 106 bacteria ml1. Wells were checked every second day for a period of at least 2 weeks for positive growth under the microscope, using a total magnification of x200. When flagellate growth was detected, the medium was transferred to a 50-ml Erlenmeyer flask containing inorganic NSY medium and fresh food bacteria. After 2 to 6 days the subsamples were further diluted to final concentrations of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 flagellate ml1 and supplemented with the bacterial strain MWH-Mo1 or CB5 at concentrations of 15 x 106 to 25 x 106 bacteria ml1. Each of these dilutions was transferred to wells of sterile 24-well cell culture plates (1 ml per well) and incubated at 15 to 22°C, depending on the origin of the isolates. Screening of the wells for the growth of flagellates was again performed by direct microscopic investigation every second day. Finally, flagellates were transferred to an Erlenmeyer flask containing fresh medium and bacteria. This procedure was repeated until pure cultures were established, but at least four times. Pure cultures were acclimatized to 16°C and transferred to permanent culture with NSY medium supplemented with wheat grains. Flagellates in permanent culture were grown at 16°C at low light and transferred once a month to fresh medium. Flagellate strains are available from the authors upon request.
![]() View larger version (42K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Sampling sites. Samples originated from different locations in Europe, Asia, Australia, New Zealand, Hawaii, and Antarctica (A). Each dot represents a sampling area comprising several remote sampling sites. For instance, the Antarctic isolates originate from habitats in three different sampling areas (B). For details, see Table S1 in the supplemental material.
|
Maximum temperature tolerance.
The isolated colorless chrysophytes were characterized regarding their temperature tolerance. During permanent culture, all strains were acclimatized to the same conditions, i.e., NSY inorganic basal medium at 16°C and pH 7.8, for at least 3 months. All experiments were run in triplicate in 4 ml in 12-well tissue culture plates with the bacterial strain Listonella pelagia CB5 as the food source. The strains were transferred to the experimental conditions, and growth was checked every 2 to 3 days by inverted light microscopy at a magnification of x200. The experiments ran usually for 3 days but up to 8 days until growth was observed. If no growth was observed after 8 days, the treatment was accepted not to support growth of the tested strain. If growth was observed, an aliquot was transferred to fresh medium and food at the next-higher temperature treatment in steps of 1 to 2°C (the temperatures tested were 17.3, 18.0, 19.2, 20.8, 23.0, 24.4, 25.2, 26.7, 28.0, 28.7, 30.7, 31.7, 32.0, 33.6, 34.6, 35.7, 36.4, 37.3, and 37.5°C). This general setup allowed for a stepwise acclimatization of the flagellate strains to the increasing temperatures tested. We generally followed this acclimatization approach, even though successful direct transfer to different temperatures provided evidence that acclimatization hardly affected the tolerance limits. In the context of this work, acclimatization is a physiological or behavioral adjustment to changes in the environment and adaptation is a trait that has evolved over a period of time and is based on a molecular mutation. All experiments were run in triplicate. Using this general strategy, the upper temperature tolerance limit was determined.
Temperature data for the habitats during sampling were not available for all habitats. Therefore, we used the mean monthly air temperatures in the respective month of sampling based on the data set for the past 10 years of the nearest weather station data provided by the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/station_data/). For some climate stations recent data were not available, and in these cases temperatures were estimated by regression of the available data sets. Where necessary, temperature data were corrected by assuming a mean decrease in air temperature with altitude of 0.7°C per 100 m (temperature decline usually varies between 0.6 and 0.8°C per 100 m [see, e.g., reference 31]).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The almost-full-length 18S rRNA gene sequences determined in this study have been deposited in the NCBI database under accession numbers DQ388538 to DQ388568.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Neighbor-joining tree showing the affiliation of SSU rRNA gene sequences from Spumella isolates with the Chrysophyceae sensu stricto. The numbers at the nodes of the tree indicate the percentage of bootstrap values for each node out of 100 bootstrap resamplings (values above 50 are shown). The scale bar indicates 2% estimated sequence divergence.
|
The temperature tolerance of the isolates was correlated with the mean monthly and mean annual air temperatures at the isolation sites (Spearman rank order correlations, r = 0.857 [P < 0.001] and r = 0.867 [P < 0.001], respectively). Similar correlation with monthly and annual temperatures at the sampling sites indicates little seasonality.
The habitat type had no effect on this correlation (for soil versus freshwater, by analysis of covariance [ANCOVA], P = 0.624).
The temperature tolerance of the isolates, excluding those from Antarctica, rose linearly with ambient air temperature (by linear regression, adjusted r2 = 0.36 [P < 0.001]) (Fig. 3). Most of the strains from Antarctic samples deviated significantly from the global trend in that they were more strongly adapted to cold conditions (Fig. 3), including several psychrophilic strains (temperature maxima of <20°C). This was significant when assuming either a linear or a logarithmic model (for a linear model, by ANCOVA, P = 0.003; for log-transformed data, by ANCOVA, P < 0.001). The test for the two different model assumptions was done because regression analysis yielded similar regression coefficients for both models (r2 = 0.685; log (X + 5) transformed, r2 = 0.729).
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Geographic pattern of temperature tolerance of Spumella-like flagellates. Maximum growth temperatures differ between strains but are generally within certain limits that relate to environmental temperature. Strains originating from Antarctica are represented by black symbols; those from other continents are represented by white symbols. For the latter there is a global linear correlation of increasing temperature tolerance with increasing environmental temperature (dashed lines). Antarctic strains deviate from this trend; i.e., the realized temperature adaptation (gray oval) is stronger than expected from the global trend (white oval). The size of the symbol indicates the number of strains for the respective condition; i.e., small symbols represent one strain, medium-sized symbols represent two or three strains; and large symbols represent five strains.
|
|
|
|---|
Based on the current knowledge a solution of the species problem in protists seems to still be a distant prospect. In the meantime, we suggest that all available data be considered, including morphology, molecular data, and ecophysiological data, to define protistan species. Our data indicate that strains identical in the SSU rRNA gene sequence seem to have similar ecophysiological characteristics as well. Ecophysiological variation, however, seems generally to be high even between closely related flagellate strains (5; this study). Even slight differences in the SSU rRNA gene sequence may already be affiliated with very different ecophysiological adaptations. Further, we have to keep in mind that eventually any species concept, i.e., a classification of organisms in distinct units, may be inappropriate or at least problematic to describe the continuous transitions that we observe in the ecophysiology of protistan strains and taxa.
Antarctic strains are cold adapted.
Our data clearly indicate an adaptation of Antarctic strains to the cold environment, even though the tolerated temperatures are far above the realized temperatures in the respective environments. We followed a conservative protocol; i.e., all strains were acclimatized to 16°C before the experiments. The deviation of the Antarctic strains from the global trend is therefore likely to be even stronger than observed in our experiment. Further, the relatively high tolerated temperatures of the cold-adapted flagellates, i.e., between 17.3 and 28°C, correspond to theoretical considerations: low-temperature adaptation of enzymes is regarded as an ongoing process, and optimal adaptation is therefore not to be expected (9). Cold adaptation of Antarctic chrysophyte flagellates has already been demonstrated for Paraphysomonas (7) and is further supported by observations of community growth of Antarctic flagellates at low temperature (25). In contrast, based on low realized growth rates of the Antarctic heterotrophic nanoflagellate community in Crooked Lake at 2°C, Laybourn-Parry et al. (24) concluded that these flagellates were not adapted. Those authors, however, did not exclude predation in their experiments, and the bacterial food concentration was below 5 x 105 bacteria ml1 with a mean bacterial cell volume of around 0.1 µm3. Under such conditions our isolates, originating from warmer habitats, would even die back (5; J. Boenigk et al. unpublished data), and we therefore do not see a conflict with the earlier study. For the investigated strains, temperature adaptation seems not to be linked to habitat characteristics, and SSU rRNA data may not provide sufficient resolution to separate ecophysiologically different clusters. Even flagellate strains identical in SSU rRNA sequence (5) and flagellate strains originating from the same habitat (this study) may differ considerably in their ecophysiology. We therefore advise caution in the ecological interpretation of experiments based on a single strain.
Geographic barriers do matter for the distribution of protists.
The west wind zone and the mainly wind-driven Antarctic circumpolar current, i.e., the strongest oceanic current (1), are the main reasons for the (bio-)geographic isolation of Antarctica and its stable cold climate. Thus, if "microbial endemism" is possible at all, then Antarctica would be a promising place to find such organisms (37). In fact, the drastic deviation of the temperature adaptation of Antarctic Spumella morphospecies from the global trend provides strong evidence for geographic transport restriction of evolutionary and, consequently, biogeographic significance. Assuming unlimited exchange of protists, one would expect that the global trend of a steady decrease in temperature tolerance with environmental temperature includes the Antarctic continent. This does not question the possibility that protistan cells are transported by air between geographic regions (37). Intercontinental transport of protists, as proposed by Finlay and Fenchel (10, 12), is very likely (cf. references 2 and 4) and is supported by the observation of significant air travel of spores and pollen to Antarctica (27). Further, the phylogenetic similarity of isolates from Antarctic and non-Antarctic sampling sites indicates recent (in evolutionary time scales) exchange. Our data show, however, that protistan transport to Antarctica is sufficiently restricted to allow the local protistan population to adapt (not only acclimatize) to local environmental conditions and thus to build up biogeographically restricted populations. The predominance of autochthonous strains from Antarctica that are identifiable from their deviation from the global trend of temperature adaptation (Fig. 2) demonstrates that successful colonization of Antarctic habitats by allochthonous strains is rare.
Based on our findings, we expect subtle cases of protistan endemism to exist also in other isolated habitats shielded by geographic barriers, as proposed by those critical of the ubiquity theorem (8, 16, 29). We assume, however, that the resolution of current taxonomic methods, including molecular analyses, may overlook endemic ecophysiological traits as well as variance at the whole-genome level. Applying finer taxonomic resolution, we may eventually find evidence for other geographic barriers to microbes. The existence of endemic morphospecies appears unlikely, since rates of global transport of microorganisms, although restricted, are too much higher than evolutionary speciation into morphologically distinct organisms. Whether microbes can be endemic or have a biogeography depends on whether we continue to restrict these terms to evolutionary distances separating species or higher taxa. It should be noted, however, that there are less permissive and durable barriers, such as geological formations or ice caps, that may give rise to geographic speciation of microbes as is known for plants and animals.
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/. ![]()
Present address: United Nations Environment Programme, World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 219 Huntington Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, United Kingdom. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»