Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2006, p. 5589-5595, Vol. 72, No. 8
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.00532-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Skip Bertman Drive, SVM-3213, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803,1 Department of Entomology, Louisiana State University, LSB-413, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 708032
Received 6 March 2006/ Accepted 25 May 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The relatively recent identification and characterization of R. felis yielded novel aspects for the genus Rickettsia. A rickettsia-like organism, first observed by electron microscopy in the midgut epithelial cells of colonized adult cat fleas, was designated the "ELB agent" after the source of the fleas, the Elward Laboratory (El Soquel, CA) flea colony (1). Amplification of rickettsial genes encoding citrate synthase (gltA) and the genus-specific 17-kDa antigen confirmed the presence of rickettsiae in the Elward Laboratory colony (3), and the name R. felis was proposed (10). Subsequent amplification of the genes encoding the 17-kDa antigen and the 190-kDa antigen (ompA) from a colony of fleas maintained at Louisiana State University (LSU) (Baton Rouge, LA) confirmed the molecular characterization of the bacteria and further classified R. felis as an SFGR (7). Although attempts were unable to produce a sustained culture of either the ELB or the LSU strains of R. felis (7, 28), propagation of R. felis isolated from fleas maintained by Flea Data, Inc. (Freeville, NY), proved successful (29). Both Vero (Cercopithecus aethiops) and XTC-2 (Xenopus laevis) cell lines were reported to be competent host cells for R. felis at 28°C (Vero and XTC-2) and 32°C (Vero only) (29). The Flea Data, Inc., isolate was designated strain Marseille-URRWXCal2 (also reported as strain California 2) (22) and is the type strain for R. felis (16). A second strain of R. felis (Pedreira) was isolated in the C6/36 (Aedes albopictus) cell line from wild-caught fleas in Brazil (11). The genome of R. felis (Marseille-URRWXCal2) has recently been described, and a number of unique characteristics were reported, including the presence of conjugative plasmids pRF and pRF
(22).
Many of the studies characterizing the relationship between R. felis and fleas have utilized the LSU colony of fleas (7, 19, 41-43, 46). By utilizing complementary in vivo and in vitro systems, the biology of this R. felis strain could be further characterized; however, the lack of viable cultures limits the scope of this model. Towards the expansion of studies relating to the transmission of R. felis, the objective of the current study is to isolate and cultivate R. felis (LSU).
The utilization of tick cell lines for the isolation of Rickettsia has become an excellent tool for previously uncultivated organisms (36, 37) as well as for protein expression analysis and genetic manipulation of SFGR in an arthropod-derived host cell (4, 5, 14, 26). For example, the infectivity of the SFGR endosymbiont Rickettsia peacockii assessed in Ixodes scapularis (ISE6), Boophilus microplus (BME26), and Dermacentor variabilis (DVE1) tick cell lines identify these cells as highly permissive, whereas L929 (Mus musculus) and Vero cell lines did not support R. peacockii replication (14).
Based on previous success with tick cell culture lines for the isolation and propagation of rickettsiae, we utilized colonized C. felis (LSU) as a source of R. felis for isolation in a susceptible line of tick cells. In this report, we describe the isolation, propagation, and partial characterization of R. felis (LSU) in an I. scapularis cell line (ISE6).
|
|
|---|
Tick cell culture.
ISE6 cells (passage 101) were kindly provided by T. Kurtti (University of Minnesota). Cells were cultured in L15B medium (with 80 mM glucose) prepared as described previously by Munderloh and Kurtti (20). The medium was supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (HyClone) and 10% tryptose phosphate broth (Sigma), and cells were maintained in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 32°C. When confluent, the cells were scraped from the flask and suspended by repeated pipetting. Cells were subcultured (1:5) in vented 25-cm2 or 75-cm2 tissue culture flasks (Griener). The medium was replaced at 6-day intervals, and cells were typically ready for subculture every 12 to 14 days. Cell viability was assessed by trypan blue exclusion. Cryopreservation of samples utilized L15B medium supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum and 10% dimethyl sulfoxide.
Rickettsia isolation.
Pools of either 10 or 25 newly emerged, unfed adult male and female fleas were sequentially washed three times in 70% ethanol and one time in 10% sodium hypochlorite and rinsed in sterile distilled water. Flea pools were transferred to sterile glass pestle tissue grinders and ground in 25 µl of L15B tick cell culture medium. The flea homogenate was directly transferred to a 25-cm2 tissue culture flask containing p105 ISE6 cells (2 days after split). ISE6 cells with flea preparations were immediately placed at 32°C. Cells were visually examined daily and passed every 7 to 14 days as needed. Preparation of cell-free rickettsiae was done by needle lysis and syringe-driven filtration across a 5.0-µm membrane, and they were collected by high-speed centrifugation as previously described (37). Upon each passage of ISE6 cells exposed to flea homogenate, a portion of the cells was prepared for staining using a Cytospin centrifuge (Wescor). Rickettsial infection was assessed by PCR and/or Diff-Quik (Dade Behring) staining according to the manufacturer's protocol.
DNA isolation.
Fleas were washed five times in 70% ethanol, followed by three washes with DNase-RNase-free water. Fleas were blotted dry and transferred individually to 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tubes containing 20 µl of DNase-RNase-free water. Samples were ground with plastic pestles and heated at 95°C for 5 min. After a brief centrifugation to collect the contents, lysates were used as PCR templates. Genomic DNA was purified from control and experimental ISE6 cells using the DNeasy tissue kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
PCR amplification.
Flea lysate, genomic DNA from ISE6 cells (uninfected and rickettsia infected), genomic DNA from Rickettsia montanensis M5/6 (positive control for the 17-kDa antigen), or water (negative control) was used as a template for PCR. PCR products were amplified using PCR Master Mix (Promega) or Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen) together with gene-specific oligonucleotide primers synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. (Table 1). The conditions used were as follows: an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 3 min, which was followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, primer-specific annealing for 45 s, extension at 72°C for 1 min per kb, and a final extension step at 72°C for 7 min. The annealing temperature for all primer sets was 55°C, with the exception of using 52°C for fD1-rP1-3, 48°C for Rr190.70p-Rr190.602n, and 50°C and 55°C for pRFa-pRFd primer sets. Amplified products were visualized on ethidium bromide-stained 0.8 to 1.5% agarose gels.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Primers used for PCR amplification and sequencing of R. felis (LSU)
|
Electron microscopy.
Transmission electron microscopy (EM) of infected ISE6 cells (p110) after five passages of rickettsial infection were prepared as described previously by Ito and Rikihisa (12), with a modified procedure for epon/araldite (EA) embedding. The volume-to-volume ratio of EA to 100% ethyl alcohol was 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1 for 1 h each, followed by 100% EA for 1 h. Samples were then kept in EA-2,4,6-tri(dimethylaminomethyl)phenol-30 for 4 h at room temperature, followed by fresh exchanges of EA-2,4,6-tri(dimethylaminomethyl)phenol-30 and sequential overnight incubations at room temperature and at 70°C. Cells were visualized on a JEM-1011 transmission EM (JEOL) in the Microscopy Center at LSU-SVM.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The sequence of ompA was determined and deposited in the GenBank database under accession number DQ408668.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (93K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Cytospin preparations of tick cells (ISE6) stained with Diff-Quik. R. felis (LSU)-infected cells demonstrating increased clearance of cytoplasmic contents and apparent vacuolization of rickettsiae (A) and uninfected ISE6 cells (B) are shown. Both images are at x100 magnification.
|
PCR amplification and sequence analysis of R. felis (LSU).
The presence of R. felis in the infected ISE6 cells was confirmed by PCR amplification and sequencing of portions of the citrate synthase (gltA), 16S rRNA, Rickettsia genus-specific 17-kDa antigen, and spotted fever group-specific outer membrane protein A (ompA) genes and, particularly, R. felis plasmids. Nucleotide sequences of the gltA (382 bp), 16S rRNA (1,461 bp), and 17-kDa antigen (434 bp) genes were identical to those of the sequences reported for R. felis in the GenBank database (accession numbers CP000053 and U33922 for the gltA gene, CP000053 for the 16S rRNA gene, and CP000053 and AF195118 for the 17-kDa antigen gene). A comparison of the ompA sequence (3,792 bp) to the published R. felis (LSU) sequences (GenBank accession numbers AF191026 [7] and AY727036 [46]) obtained from the same source of infected fleas (LSU colony) exhibited two nucleotide differences (C-to-T and G-to-A transitions at positions corresponding to bp 1,201 and bp 1,511 of the sequence reported under GenBank accession number AF191026) and one nucleotide difference (G-to-A transition at a position corresponding to bp 1,063 of the sequence reported under GenBank accession number AY727036), respectively, in the coding region, resulting in changes in the amino acid composition (Table 2). We further analyzed the remaining ompA sequence and identified 13 additional differences, including a transition, transversions, deletions, and insertions, with respect to the sequence reported previously by Bouyer et al. (7). The ompA sequence identified in this report is identical to that reported for R. felis (Marseille-URRWXCal2) (GenBank accession number CP000053) (Table 2).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Comparison of nucleotide and amino acid compositions of OmpA from R. felis LSU and URRWXCal2 strains
|
) and a long form (pRF), in R. felis (Marseille-URRWXCal2) cultivated in the XTC-2 cell line and also in fleas naturally infected with R. felis (22), we attempted molecular confirmation of the plasmid content using the above-described primers. Both R. felis (LSU)-infected fleas and infected ISE6 cells, validated by a partial sequence of the 17-kDa antigen gene, were subjected to testing by PCR amplification with the primer sets specific to either pRF or pRF
(Table 1) and verified by sequencing. There was a correlation between R. felis infection and the amplification of the pRF plasmid in both fleas and cultured R. felis (Fig. 2). However, the pRF
plasmid was not amplified in all samples tested, despite attempts to optimize the PCR conditions (data not shown). The PCR-amplified portion (1,342 bp) of the pRF sequence matched (100%) that reported for R. felis strain Marseille-URRWXCal2 (GenBank accession number CP000053).
![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. PCR amplification of genes encoding Rickettsia genus-specific 17-kDa antigen and plasmids from R. felis (LSU)-infected fleas (A) and ISE6 cells (B). For both the R. felis-infected flea lysate and ISE6 cells, partial sequences for the genes encoding the 17-kDa antigen and pRF, but not pRF , were amplified. R. montanensis M5/6 genomic DNA was used as a positive control for 17-kDa primers. Marker (100 bp) sizes are listed to the left of the gel.
|
![]() View larger version (70K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Electron micrographs of R. felis (LSU) in ISE6 tick cells. Rickettsiae free in the cytoplasm (dark arrows) associated with dilated endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and nuclear (n) membrane (bar, 500 nm) (A), rickettsiae partially enclosed in a vacuole within the host cytoplasm (bar, 500 nm) (B), and high numbers of rickettsiae grouped together in the cytoplasm (bar, 2.0 µm) (C) are shown.
|
|
|
|---|
Tick cell lines created for several genera of ixodid (hard) and argasid (soft) ticks have unique characteristics (14, 21) and are useful for the isolation of SFGR in natural host cells. Both R. peacockii and Rickettsia monacensis have been cultivated in cells derived from naturally infected Dermacentor andersoni and Ixodes ricinus ticks, respectively (36, 37). The infectivity of the endosymbiont R. peacockii was assessed and was reported to multiply in several tick cell lines and in an insect cell line but not in mammalian L929 or Vero cell lines and is enhanced by high seeding densities and centrifugation (14). Likewise, isolation of R. felis (Marseille-URRWXCal2 and Pedreira) in amphibian (XTC-2) and insect (C6/36) cell lines utilizes centrifugation via the shell vial technique (29). Additionally, both R. felis isolates display optimal growth at temperatures below 32°C, inferring a low-temperature requirement for R. felis propagation (11, 16, 29). For the present study, we chose what is considered to be a permissive cell line from I. scapularis (14) for the isolation of R. felis from colonized fleas. Both infected host cells and cell-free rickettsiae were infective for new cells during passage at 32°C, without a temperature shift or the use of centrifugation. It is likely that a combination of factors, including a high prevalence of R. felis infection in the flea colony (W. Pornwiroon and K. R. Macaluso, unpublished results) and a permissive cell line, facilitated the isolation of this previously uncultivated strain of R. felis. These findings suggest either the presence of undefined conserved arthropod-derived factors (e.g., receptors) for rickettsia on the host cell or that the rickettsiae express the required molecules needed for attachment to and entry into tick cells.
Assessment of cultured and flea-associated R. felis (LSU) genetic composition demonstrates differences in comparison to previous reports of R. felis (LSU). The sequence for ompA in R. felis (LSU) contains several stop codons that potentially result in a truncated protein (7, 46). In the present study, a coding sequence mixed between previously reported sequences of R. felis (LSU) (7, 46) was identified using primers described previously by Zavala-Castro et al. (46) and novel primers. However, analysis of our entire sequence (3,792 bp) revealed three coding sequences identical to that reported for R. felis (Marseille-URRWXCal2) (GenBank accession number CP000053, under locus tags RF_1303, RF_1304, and RF_1305), and several stop codons were not found. Although R. felis (LSU) ompA transcription analysis has been addressed previously (46), the assessment of functional protein expression of OmpA is lacking for R. felis. The significance of the modified OmpA, in comparison to other SFGR, must be assessed, as SFGR OmpA has been demonstrated to be involved in rickettsial adherence to, and invasion of, host cells (17). Although transcribed, the lack of functional OmpA in the endosymbiont R. peacockii has been associated with decreased pathogenicity and the absence of horizontal transmission (5, 14, 37). The partial sequences for genes encoding citrate synthase, the 17-kDa antigen, 16S rRNA, and plasmid pRF match previously identified sequences for R. felis. One difference between R. felis (LSU) and the type strain Marseille-URRWXCal2 is the lack of a detectable short-form plasmid, pRF
, in R. felis (LSU). The reason for the plasmid count discrepancies between the two strains is not clear. The fleas from which the type strain was isolated were maintained on an artificial feeding system (40), which typically utilizes defibrinated sheep or cow blood as a source of blood meal. Conversely, the LSU fleas are maintained only on cat hosts. The possibility of host-associated differences (e.g., blood meal composition) influencing rickettsial genetics is intriguing; however, a portion of R. felis pRF
was amplified in 100% of unidentified wild-caught R. felis-infected fleas from unidentified hosts in Algeria, France, and New Zealand (22). Wild-caught fleas from naturally infested dogs that were the source of R. felis (Pedreira) were not assessed for plasmid composition (11).
Many tick-borne SFGR are maintained primarily via transovarial transmission within the tick, and the same is thought to be true for the flea-associated SFGR R. felis. Therefore, the utilization of tick cells as host cells provides an excellent model system for the expansion of studies examining the interactions between R. felis and arthropod hosts. Microscopic analysis of R. felis (LSU) infection of ISE6 cells identified a cytopathic effect that was not previously reported for this organism. When stained, the increased vacuolization or clearance of cytoplasmic contents within the host cell (spongy appearance) was associated with R. felis infection and was not obvious in uninfected ISE6 cells. Additionally, host cell lysis of rickettsia-filled cells is not apparent, despite the cell detachment from the flask. EM analysis confirmed the heavy rickettsial load in the cells, thereby supporting the possibility of a persistently infected cell line, as seen for other SFGR in tick and vertebrate cell lines (26, 37, 39). Based on the stained cell preparations, we suspected vacuolization, as observed for R. felis (LSU) infection in fleas (7); however, our EM analysis did not confirm vacuolization, as a definitive vacuolar membrane was not identified. R. felis infection in tick cells resulted in the dilation of the nuclear membrane and the endoplasmic reticulum, which is associated with cell lysis during Rickettsia rickettsii infection (34, 35). However, similar to R. rickettsii cultures in tick cell lines, tick cells are able to tolerate a high rickettsial burden with reduced cell lysis (26).
In addition to rickettsial comparative genomics and metabolism studies in an arthropod host cell, Rickettsia-arthropod interactions that are critical to our understanding of the ecology of this emerging vector-borne disease will be enhanced by the propagation of R. felis (LSU) in vitro. The relatively recent description of R. felis has been followed by the molecular identification of R. felis in cat fleas collected from rodents, opossums, and domestic and feral cats. In fact, the distribution of R. felis appears to be cosmopolitan, as the molecular detection of R. felis in fleas from Brazil (11, 23), Cyprus (27), Ethiopia (29), France (31), Spain (18), the United Kingdom (33), Thailand (25), and New Zealand (13) has been described previously, in addition to the original description from the United States (1). While the primary identification of R. felis infection in arthropods has been in cat fleas (2, 6, 18, 23, 25, 31), molecular identification of R. felis has been reported for three other species of flea, including Ctenocephalides canis (dog flea) (25), Pulex irritans (human flea) (2), and, most recently, Anomiopsyllus nudata (38). The identification of infected A. nudata fleas from Neotoma albigula wood rats collected in the western United States suggests that transmission cycles exist independent of domestic and peridomestic animals and their ectoparasites. The role of small rodents and their fleas must be explored further, and the cultivation of R. felis will also allow for vector competence studies using species of fleas other than C. felis.
Horizontal transmission of R. felis by cat fleas has not been demonstrated. The pathogenic nature of R. felis should be defined, and the isolation of several strains of R. felis will facilitate epidemiological studies. Cats seroconvert due to exposure to infected fleas; however, overt disease was not observed, and viable rickettsiae have not been recovered from cats (42). Although the specificity of the reactions has been limited due to the high cross-reactivity of antibodies to different rickettsial species, serological assays are the primary techniques for diagnosing R. felis infection in vertebrate hosts. Defining the mechanisms of R. felis transmission, specifically, the respective roles of invertebrate and vertebrate hosts, is essential to fully appreciate the epidemiology of flea-associated spotted fever and will greatly impact the application of appropriate control measures.
This research was supported by the Louisiana Board of Regents (LEQSF), the National Institutes of Health (P20 RR0201595), and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K22AI60821).
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»