AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Author's Correction for Li et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72 (2) 1639-1644.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, X. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Rosche, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Li, X. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Rosche, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Li, X. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Rosche, B.

 Previous Article

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2006, p. 5678, Vol. 72, No. 8
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.01321-06

AUTHOR'S CORRECTION

Enhanced Benzaldehyde Tolerance in Zymomonas mobilis Biofilms and the Potential of Biofilm Applications in Fine-Chemical Production

Xuan Zhong Li, Jeremy S. Webb, Staffan Kjelleberg, and Bettina Rosche

School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences and Centre for Marine Biofouling and Bio-innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia

Volume 72, no. 2, p. 1639-1644, 2006. There was a minor error in the calculation of volumetric productivity. Page 1641, column 2, line 35: "10 mM h–1 or 25.9 g liter–1 day–1" should read "8.1 mM h–1 or 21 g liter–1 day–1 (based on the packed bed void volume)." The derived value for specific productivity should change from 8.11 g (g biomass)–1 day–1 to 6.6 g (g biomass)–1 day–1 (page 1639, line 16; page 1641, column 2, line 37; page 1643, column 2, line 3). Accordingly on page 1643, column 1, line 19, the statement "were more than twofold higher" should change to "were higher." Page 1643, Table 1: the value for (S)-styrene oxide specific productivity should be 5.5. These changes do not alter the overall results or any conclusion of the study.

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2006, p. 5678, Vol. 72, No. 8
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.01321-06





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, X. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Rosche, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Li, X. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Rosche, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Li, X. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Rosche, B.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals