Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 2006, p. 6388-6393, Vol. 72, No. 9
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.02218-05
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
| SHORT REPORT |
Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, and Department of Microbiology, College of Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331
Received 19 September 2005/ Accepted 16 June 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the processes of sporulation in Bacillus and Clostridium species are assumed to be similar, recent genome sequencing has identified some important differences. One example of the difference is that the phosphorelay pathway required to activate Spo0A in Bacillus species is absent in Clostridium species (4, 8, 16, 17). To gain insight into the fundamental differences between the sporulation mechanisms of Clostridium and Bacillus species, it is essential to perform molecular analyses of sporulation-specific genes in clostridia. Research on many pathogenic Clostridium species, such as C. botulinum, C. difficile, and C. tetani, is hampered by the lack of genetic tools to introduce knockout mutations into the genome. However, mutagenesis is possible in C. perfringens. Therefore, we used C. perfringens as a model organism with which to study the sporulation process in other pathogenic clostridia. We hypothesized that if the mechanism of Spo0A-regulated sporulation in C. perfringens is similar to that in other Clostridium species, then the lack of endospore formation in a spo0A knockout mutant of C. perfringens should be complemented by wild-type spo0A from other clostridia. To evaluate this hypothesis, in this study we (i) constructed complementing plasmids carrying wild-type spo0A from C. acetobutylicum, C. botulinum, C. difficile, or C. tetani, (ii) introduced these complementing plasmids into a C. perfringens spo0A knockout mutant, and (iii) evaluated the sporulation capabilities of the complemented strains.
The wild-type spo0A open reading frame (ORF) plus a
400-bp upstream sequence of C. botulinum (strain Hall), C. difficile (strain 630), and C. tetani (CN655) were PCR amplified from each genomic DNA using primer pairs CPP61-CPP62, CPP51-CPP52, and CPP59-CPP60, respectively (Table 1). The spo0A ORF and
400-bp upstream region of C. acetobutylicum were PCR amplified from pMSPOA (Table 2) using primers CPP70 and CPP71 (Table 1). The amplified PCR products from C. acetobutylicum, C. botulinum, C. difficile, and C. tetani were then cloned into pCR-XL-TOPO (Invitrogen) to create pIH1, pIH3, pIH8, and pIH13, respectively (Table 2). The DNA inserts in these plasmids were sequenced to ensure that no mutation was introduced during PCR amplification. KpnI/XhoI fragments of pIH1, pIH3, pIH8, and pIH13 were then recloned into the KpnI/SalI sites of the Escherichia coli-C. perfringens shuttle vector pJIR751 (2) to create complementing plasmids pIH2, pIH4, pIH9, and pIH14, respectively (Table 2). The complementing plasmids were then introduced into the C. perfringens spo0A mutant IH101 by electroporation (7). PCR analyses with spo0A-specific internal primers (Table 1) from each Clostridium species confirmed the presence of wild-type spo0A in IH101 transformants (data not shown).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Primers used in this study
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Sporulation of complemented strains grown in DS medium
|
Next, we examined whether differences in the promoter region were responsible for the lack of C. botulinum spo0A expression. We constructed a recombinant plasmid, pIH7, carrying C. botulinum spo0A fused with the spo0A promoter region from C. perfringens (Table 2). As a control, pIH12, which carries C. difficile spo0A fused with the C. perfringens spo0A promoter, was also constructed (Table 2). In addition, since a recent study (18) showed that a chimeric Spo0A, containing the response regulator domain of B. subtilis Spo0A fused with the DNA-binding domain of C. botulinum Spo0A, could partially restore spore formation in a B. subtilis spo0A mutant, we constructed similar chimeric plasmids: plasmids pIH19 and pIH21, carrying the C. perfringens Spo0A response regulator domain fused to the DNA-binding domain of Spo0A from C. botulinum and C. difficile, respectively (Table 2). Nucleotide sequencing confirmed that no PCR-generated mutation was introduced during PCR amplification of the inserts. The recombinant fusion plasmids, pIH7, pIH12, pIH19, and pIH21, were introduced into IH101 by electroporation. Our RT-PCR analyses detected spo0A-specific RT-PCR products from RNAs of all four transformants, indicating that both wild-type and chimeric spo0A of C. botulinum and C. difficile were expressed in the C. perfringens spo0A mutant when placed under the control of the C. perfringens spo0A promoter. However, when the spore-forming capabilities of these transformants were compared with that of their host strain, IH101, no refractile endospores were detected after 8 h of growth in DS medium and no significant increase in heat-resistant spore formation was observed (Table 3.)
To determine if the inability of both wild-type and chimeric spo0A from C. botulinum and C. difficile to restore spore formation in IH101 resulted from a lack of Spo0A production, Western blot analysis was performed as previously described (18). Briefly, C. perfringens strains were grown in DS medium and sonicated until >95% of cells were lysed, and then each culture lysate was analyzed for the presence of Spo0A by using an antibody against B. subtilis Spo0A. As expected, a Spo0A-specific immunoreactive band was observed in lysates prepared from SM101 and IH101(pMRS123), while no Spo0A-specific band was detected in lysates prepared from spo0A mutant IH101 (Fig. 1A). A Spo0A-specific immunoreactive band was also observed in sporulating culture lysates prepared from IH101 carrying wild-type or chimeric spo0A from C. botulinum or C. difficile, albeit at an intensity lower than those for SM101 and IH101(pMRS123) (Fig. 1A). To ensure that the lower intensity of the Spo0A-specific band observed was not due to a different reactivity to the antibody against Bacillus Spo0A, Western blot analysis of the two complemented strains IH101(pIH2) and IH101(pIH14) was also performed. The Spo0A-specific immunoreactive bands detected for both strains were similar in intensity to those of SM101 and IH101(pMRS123) (Fig. 1B). These results suggested that the inability of the wild-type and chimeric Spo0A from C. botulinum and C. difficile to restore spore formation in the C. perfringens spo0A mutant may be a result of decreased production of Spo0A.
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Western blot analysis of Spo0A production by wild-type C. perfringens and complemented strains. C. perfringens strains were grown in DS medium and sonicated as described elsewhere (10, 11). An aliquot (20 µl) of each sonicated culture lysate was subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by Western blotting with anti-B. subtilis Spo0A antibodies. The blot was subjected to chemiluminescence detection to identify immunoreactive species. (A) Results are shown for control strains SM101 (wild type) and IH101 (spo0A knockout mutant) and for representative complemented strains IH101(pMRS123), IH101(pIH7), IH101(pIH19), IH101(pIH12), and IH101(pIH21). (B) Results are shown for control strains SM101 (wild type) and IH101(pMRS123) and for complemented strains IH101(pIH2) and IH101(pIH14). The arrow on the left of the blot indicates the migration of the Spo0A-specific immunoreactive band.
|
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Comparative expression of spo0A mRNAs from IH101(pIH19) and IH101(pMRS123). Various amounts of RNA, extracted from IH101(pMRS123) and IH101(pIH19) cultures grown in DS medium at 37°C for 6 h as previously described (7, 10), were separated by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel and transferred by Northern blotting. The blots were hybridized with an AlkPhos-labeled spo0A probe, and hybridized probe was then detected by CDPstar chemiluminescence (Amersham Bioscience). The relative levels of spo0A mRNA in IH101(pIH19) were determined from a calibration curve, which was made using various amounts (2.0 to 8.0 µg) of RNA prepared from the high-Spo0A-producing strain IH101(pMRS123). The densitometric analysis was performed on a Macintosh computer using the public domain NIH Image program (developed at the U.S. National Institutes of Health and available on the Internet at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/). The spo0A mRNA-specific band is indicated by an arrow. The various amounts of RNA loaded on the gel are given at the bottom of the blot.
|
35-kDa CPE-specific immunoreactive band in Western blots of lysates prepared from sporulating cultures of complemented strains IH101(pMRS123), IH101(pIH2), and IH101(pIH14) (data not shown). However, no CPE-specific immunoreactivity was detected in lysates prepared from complemented strains carrying wild-type or chimeric spo0A from C. botulinum or C. difficile grown under sporulation conditions (data not shown). Quantitative Western blot analyses (6, 15) showed similar levels of CPE production by complemented strains IH101(pIH14) and IH101(pMRS123) (data not shown). Although IH101(pIH2) produced a slightly smaller amount of CPE than IH101(pIH14) and IH101(pMRS123), this was not due to the influence of either total growth or sporulation (data not shown). Collectively, these results indicated that the lack of CPE production in the C. perfringens spo0A knockout mutant was restored by complementing the mutant with recombinant plasmids carrying wild-type spo0A from C. acetobutylicum or C. tetani but not from C. difficile or C. botulinum. In summary, our results demonstrated that wild-type spo0A from C. acetobutylicum or C. tetani, but not from C. botulinum or C. difficile, restored sporulation and CPE production in a spo0A mutant of C. perfringens. The inability of wild-type and chimeric spo0A from C. botulinum or C. difficile to complement the sporulation defect of the C. perfringens spo0A mutant cannot be explained by the low level of amino acid sequence identity between Spo0A from C. perfringens and Spo0A from C. botulinum or C. difficile. Note that high levels of sequence identity were obtained when the amino acid sequence of Spo0A from C. perfringens was compared with those from C. acetobutylicum (76%), C. botulinum (78%), C. difficile (60%), and C. tetani (76%) (data not shown). The putative phosphorylation site (LDIIMP), the conformational switch region (KPFD), and the helix-turn-helix (HTH) DNA-binding motif are also highly conserved in all Clostridium species compared (Fig. 3).
![]() View larger version (63K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Comparison of amino acid sequences of phosphoacceptor and effector domains of Spo0A from C. perfringens (C.p), C. acetobutylicum (C.a), C. botulinum (C.b), C. difficile (C.d), and C. tetani (C.t). Asterisks indicate residues that are identical in all five species. Highlighting indicates possible active sites: SP, putative site of phosphorylation; CS, the conformational region; HTH, the helix-turn-helix motif. The deduced amino acid sequences of Spo0A from C. perfringens, C. acetobutylicum, and C. tetani were available on the Entrez Genome website (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=Genome). The amino acid sequences of C. botulinum and C. difficile were obtained from the Sanger Institute's website (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/). Amino acid alignment was performed using the ClustalW program and modified with Microsoft PowerPoint.
|
We are grateful to M. R. Popoff, Institute Pasteur, France, for providing us with genomic DNAs of C. botulinum strain Hall and C. tetani strain CN655 and to J. D. Haraldsen of the Linc Sonenshein lab, Tufts University School of Medicine, for genomic DNA of C. difficile strain 630. We are also grateful to E. T. Papoutsakis, Northwestern University, Illinois, for providing us with pMSPOA. We thank B. A. McClane, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, for providing us with purified CPE and a CPE antibody. We also thank Michael Waters for technical assistance in constructing pIH3 and pIH4 and D. D. Rockey (Oregon State University) for editorial comments.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»