This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow An author's correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hong, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sun, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hong, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sun, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hong, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sun, G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2007, p. 64-72, Vol. 73, No. 1
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.01415-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Respiration and Growth of Shewanella decolorationis S12 with an Azo Compound as the Sole Electron Acceptor{triangledown} ,{dagger}

Yiguo Hong,1,2,3 Meiying Xu,1 Jun Guo,1 Zhicheng Xu,1 Xingjuan Chen,1 and Guoping Sun1*

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Microbial Culture Collection and Application, Guangdong Institute of Microbiology, Guangzhou 510070, China,1 South China Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, Guangzhou 510650, China,2 Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China3

Received 20 June 2006/ Accepted 17 October 2006


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
The ability of Shewanella decolorationis S12 to obtain energy for growth by coupling the oxidation of various electron donors to dissimilatory azoreduction was investigated. This microorganism can reduce a variety of azo dyes by use of formate, lactate, pyruvate, or H2 as the electron donor. Furthermore, strain S12 grew to a maximal density of 3.0 x 107 cells per ml after compete reduction of 2.0 mM amaranth in a defined medium. This was accompanied by a stoichiometric consumption of 4.0 mM formate over time when amaranth and formate were supplied as the sole electron acceptor and donor, respectively, suggesting that microbial azoreduction is an electron transport process and that this electron transport can yield energy to support growth. Purified membranous, periplasmic, and cytoplasmic fractions from S12 were analyzed, but only the membranous fraction was capable of reducing azo dyes with formate, lactate, pyruvate, or H2 as the electron donor. The presence of 5 µM Cu2+ ions, 200 µM dicumarol, 100 µM stigmatellin, and 100 µM metyrapone inhibited anaerobic azoreduction activity by both whole cells and the purified membrane fraction, showing that dehydrogenases, cytochromes, and menaquinone are essential electron transfer components for azoreduction. These results provide evidence that the microbial anaerobic azoreduction is linked to the electron transport chain and suggest that the dissimilatory azoreduction is a form of microbial anaerobic respiration. These findings not only expand the number of potential electron acceptors known for microbial energy conservation but also elucidate the mechanisms of microbial anaerobic azoreduction.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
Bacteria within the Shewanella genus are metabolically versatile and are able to use a diverse range of organic substrates and metals as terminal electron acceptors for growth and survival. Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, which can utilize a variety of compounds as terminal electron acceptors, including Fe(III), Mn(IV), U(VI), As(V), and humic substances, is arguably the most versatile bacterium studied to date (9, 24-28, 35). The diverse metabolic and physiological capabilities of Shewanella species make them useful for environmental cleanup and bioremediation (17, 40). Shewanella decolorationis S12, a new species of the genus Shewanella, was isolated from the activated sludge of a textile printing wastewater treatment plant in Guangzhou, China. Apart from oxygen, strain S12 can grow with various electron acceptors, including nitrate (NO3), nitrite (NO2), ferric iron (Fe3+), sulfite (SO32–), and anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AQDS), but not with sulfate (SO42–) (44), demonstrating that it has remarkable respiratory versatility, as do other members of Shewanella.

Azo dyes are almost all xenobiotic compounds, characterized by one or more azo groups (-N=N-). They are toxic, highly persistent, and ubiquitously distributed in the environment, therefore resulting in serious environmental pollution. Their discharge into open waters not only presents an aesthetic problem but also results in toxicity to aquatic life and eventually affects human health (8, 11). To date, many bacterial strains have been described as being capable of reducing azo dyes, including obligate anaerobes (e.g., Bacteroides sp., Eubacterium sp., and Clostridium sp.) (6, 32), facultative anaerobes (e.g., Sphingomonas sp. strain BN6, Pseudomonas luteola, Proteus vulgaris, and Streptococcus faecalis) (13, 18, 19, 37), and some intestinal anaerobes (7, 12). Normally, upon reductive cleavage of the azo bond, azo dyes are reduced and aromatic amines are formed. These aromatic amines are subsequently mineralized aerobically. Azoreduction by bacteria has generally been considered a specific reaction by azoreductases under aerobic conditions (2-4, 10, 29, 39) or a nonspecific reductive process mediated by redox mediators shuttling electrons from the bacteria to the azo dyes under anaerobic conditions (19, 33, 38). Many NAD(P)H- or flavin mononucleotide-dependent azoreductases have been isolated from a range of bacteria (2-4, 10, 29, 39). However, the precise mechanism of anaerobic azoreduction is unknown. Although a capacity for azoreduction has been found in various microorganisms, none of these organisms has been shown to generate energy from azoreduction alone. We report here that the facultative anaerobe S. decolorationis S12 can reduce azo compounds under anaerobic conditions and couple its growth to this reduction.


arrow
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 
Azo dyes and chemical regents.
Azo dyes were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, and their chemical structures are depicted in Table 1. Amaranth was used as a model azo dye in this study. The ion-pair agent tetrabutylammonium hydrogensulfate (TBAHS) was purchased (purity of >99%) from Fluka. 1-Naphthylamine-4-sulfonic acid sodium and 1-naphthylamine-2-hydroxy-3,6-disulfonic acid sodium standards were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. All other reagents are analytical grade.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Characteristics of azo dyes used in this study

Media, strains, and cultivation.
S. decolorationis S12T (CCTCC M 203093, IAM 15094) was isolated from activated sludge from a textile printing wastewater treatment plant in Guangzhou, China (44). S. decolorationis was cultured aerobically at 32°C in LB medium or anaerobically in a defined medium (pH 7.4) (10 mM succinate, 5.7 mM Na2HPO4, 3.3 mM KH2PO4, 18.0 mM NH4Cl, 1.01 mM MgSO4, L-cysteine [20 µg/ml], vitamin solution, and mineral solution [43]). This defined medium, when supplemented with appropriate alternative electron donors and terminal electron acceptors, was able to support the growth of S. decolorationis S12.

Standard anaerobic techniques were used throughout this study as described by Vargas et al. (41). All gases were passed through a filter prior to use. The medium was prepared by adding concentrated stock solutions of all medium components into O2-free distilled water, and the solution was equilibrated with N2-CO2 (4:1). To study the coupling of azoreduction to the oxidation of electron donors, cells were grown in the defined medium (initial pH, 7.4) containing different electron donors with the azo compound amaranth serving as the electron acceptor. Cells were cultured in 50-ml serum bottles sealed with butyl rubber stoppers at a constant temperature (32°C) in an anaerobic station (RUSKINN C0105). The medium was bubbled with N2-CO2 (4:1) and filtered (0.2-µm filters) before incubation. H2 was provided at 96 kPa as the electron donor. The initial concentration of cells was ~3.0 x 105 to 3.8 x 105 CFU/ml unless otherwise indicated.

Membrane isolation and vesicle preparation.
Membrane isolation and vesicle preparation were performed using the method of Sapra et al. (36), with some modifications. Buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl buffer [pH 8.0], containing 2 mM sodium dithionite) was used throughout. Cell extracts of S. decolorationis S12 were prepared by suspending 5 g (wet weight) of frozen cells in 50 ml of buffer A. The cell suspension was sonicated in an ice bath (3 s, 40% output, 80x; SONICS VC-505). Cell breakage was monitored by examining the cells under a microscope. Unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 15 min. The crude extract was then centrifuged at 150,000 x g for 2.0 h. The resulting pellet contained the cell membrane whereas cytoplasmic proteins remained in the supernatant. The membrane fraction was resuspended in buffer A, which allowed vesicles to form spontaneously. The formation of vesicles was confirmed by transmission electron microscopy (Analysis and Test Centre, Zhongshan University). Protein concentrations were determined by the method of Bradford (5), using bovine serum albumin as the standard.

Isolation of periplasmic proteins.
Cell cultures were harvested during late log phase, after approximately 15 h of growth, by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 20 min (4°C) and washed once with 40 ml ice-cold 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0. All isolation steps were carried out under aerobic conditions at 4°C with gentle stirring, unless otherwise indicated. The periplasmic fraction was prepared using a modification of the method of Osborn and Munson (30). Cells were resuspended in ice-cold 750 mM sucrose, 30 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and incubated for 5 min. Lysozyme was added to a final concentration of 0.15 mg per ml, and incubation was continued for another 2 min. Two volumes of 7.5 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, were added over a period of 10 min and then stirred for an additional 10 min. The suspension was then placed, without stirring, at room temperature for 15 min to permit the formation of spheroplasts. Spheroplasts were separated from the periplasm by centrifugation at 27,000 x g for 20 min. The resulting pellet contained the spheroplasts whereas the supernatant contained the periplasmic fraction.

Liquid chromatography.
The azoreduction products were analyzed using a liquid chromatography system consisting of a 510 pump (Waters), a Waters 996 programmable photodiode array detector (Waters Chromatography Division, Milford, MA) operated at 254 nm, and a model 7125 valve injector (Rheodyne, Cotati, CA) with a 20-µl loop. The temperature was controlled by a Goldenfoil (Systec, Minneapolis, MN) dual-zone column temperature control system and was fixed at 20°C. The chromatographic separations were performed on Hypersil ODS columns (250 by 4.6 mm inside diameter). Acetonitrile-1 mM aqueous TBAHS (10:90, vol/vol) was used as eluent A against pure acetonitrile as eluent B. The velocity of flow remained 1 ml/min. From 0 to 5 min, the analysis ran isocratically, 100% for eluent A, and then a 25-min gradient was run with a two-percent slope decrease per minute for eluent A and a two-percent slope increase for eluent B. Afterwards, a 20-min reequilibration was run.

Analysis methods.
The concentrations of formate, lactate, and pyruvate were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography with separation on a polysulfonate ion-exclusion column (Metrosep A Supp 5). The effluent contained the following: 3.2 mM Na2CO3, 0.8 mM NaHCO3, and 3% methanol. The experiment was performed at 25°C and 7.3 mPa. Cell numbers were determined by 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining and direct counting with epifluorescence microscopy. All assays were done in triplicate The azoreduction activity was calculated according to the following formula, using the maximum absorbance as shown in Table 1: percent azoreduction = [(A – B)/A] x 100, where A is initial absorbance and B is observed absorbance. One unit of activity of azoreduction is defined as the reduction of 1 µM amaranth per min per mg protein.


arrow
RESULTS
 
Azoreduction coupled to the oxidation of electron donors.
To demonstrate the dependence of azoreduction in strain S12 on oxidation of primer electron donors, we inoculated S12 into a defined medium supplemented with different electron donors and azo compounds under anaerobic conditions. Experimental results showed that H2, formate, lactate, and pyruvate were able to serve as electron donors for reduction of amaranth (Fig. 1A) and other azo compounds (Table 2). However, S12 was not able to use acetate, propionate, salicylate, glycerin, glucose, carbinol, ethanol, sucrose, fructose, glucose, citrate, succinate, fumarate, or benzoate as electron donors for azoreduction. Azoreduction was an enzymatic process, as neither H2 nor any of the organic electron donors were able to reduce amaranth or other azo compounds in the absence of S12. Azoreduction also did not occur when cells were killed by incubation at 95°C for 30 min.


Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Azoreduction coupled to the oxidation of electron donors by S. decolorationis S12 under anaerobic conditions. (A) Electron donors (ED) for anaerobic azoreduction by S. decolorationis S12. The initial concentration of formate, lactate, and pyruvate was 5 mM, and H2 was provided at 96 kPa. (B) Reduction of amaranth coupled to formate oxidation. All measurements are the averages of three independent experiments done using amaranth as the electron acceptor and different electron donors at 32°C under anaerobic conditions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Reduction of azo dyes by S. decolorationis S12 with H2 or an organic compound as the electron donora

To quantify the electron transfer from the electron donor to the azo dyes, the oxidization of formate and the reduction of amaranth were determined simultaneously in cultures containing 5 mM formate and 1 mM amaranth. Within 40 h, the complete disappearance of 1.0 mM amaranth was accompanied by a stoichiometric consumption of 2.0 mM formate over time (Fig. 1B). When 1.0 mM amaranth was completely reduced, the consumption of formate simultaneously ceased. The molar ratio of the formate oxidized to the amaranth reduced was 1.92. Because one molecule of formate provides two electrons and one molecule of amaranth (one azo bond) can accept four electrons, the ratio should theoretically be 2.0. The measured molar ratio suggests that almost all of the electrons accepted by amaranth were from formate. The amounts of formate consumed and amaranth reduced were consistent with the following reaction: Ar1-N = N-Ar2 + 2 formate + 2 H2O ->Ar1-NH2 + H2N-Ar2 + 2 HCO3 + 2 H+.

Analysis of azoreduction products.
Amaranth was used as a model azo dye in this study. A detection assay was designed based on the characteristics of azo compounds. The double bond of the azo linkage together with the conjugated-bond system of the aromatic components constitutes the chromophore of the azo dyes. The color of the azo compound is the result of the conjugated system, which facilitates electron delocalization, with the energy absorption in the visible region of the spectrum (45). If the double bond of the azo compounds is reduced, the azo compounds are decolorized. Therefore, the rate of azoreduction was quantified using the change in optical density value measured at a specific wavelength. The products of azoreduction were analyzed by liquid chromatography. The retention times (Rt) of amaranth, 1-naphthylamine-4-sulfonic acid sodium, and 1-naphthylamine-2-hydroxy-3,6-disulfonic acid sodium standards were 22.183, 14.524, and 19.201 min, respectively (Fig. 2). Once amaranth was reduced, there were two new peaks (Rt1 = 14.487 min, Rt2 = 18.924 min) in the chromatographs (Fig. 2B). Reduction products of peak 1 and peak 2 match with 1-naphthylamine-4-sulfonic acid sodium and 1-naphthylamine-2-hydroxy-3,6-disulfonic acid sodium in both retention time and full wavelength spectrograms, confirming that when amaranth was reduced by cleavage of the azo bond, two reduction products, 1-naphthylamine-4-sulfonic acid sodium and 1-naphthylamine-2-hydroxy-3,6-disulfonic acid sodium, were formed concomitantly. After the reduced amaranth was incubated for 7 days under anaerobic conditions, the concentration of the reduction products remained unchanged, indicating that the reduction products from amaranth were not used further by strain S12.


Figure 2
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Ion-pair high-performance liquid chromatography chromatograms (A1 to D1) and full wavelength spectrograms (A2 to D2) of reduction products from amaranth and standards. (A1 and A2) Amaranth standard. (B1 and B2) Reduction products of amaranth. (C1 and C2) 1-Naphthylamine-4-sulfonic acid sodium standard. (D1 and D2) 1-Naphthylamine-2-hydroxy-3,6-disulfonic acid sodium standard. AU, absorbance units.

Growth of S. decolorationis S12 with amaranth as the sole electron acceptor.
As S. decolorationis S12 is a Cys-deficient strain, cysteine must be added to the medium in order for S. decolorationis S12 to grow. When S. decolorationis S12 was grown in defined medium with formate as the sole electron donor and amaranth as the electron acceptor, amaranth was reduced to aromatic amines over time. Figure 3 shows the anaerobic growth of S. decolorationis S12 coupled to the reduction of amaranth. The biomass yield was directly proportional to the amount of amaranth reduced (Fig. 3A). Growth of S12 coincided with the reduction of amaranth and stopped as amaranth became depleted. No growth occurred when electron donors were absent from the medium or when the electron donors were provided but the azo compound was omitted. S12 grew to a maximal density of 3.0 x 107 cells per ml at 32°C in the defined medium and completely reduced the 2.0 mM amaranth (Fig. 3B). These results indicate that with azo compounds as an electron acceptor, the presence of succinate and the use of formate or H2 as the electron donor are essential for the anaerobic growth of S. decolorationis S12. Succinate alone did not support growth or azoreduction, suggesting that it was used only as a carbon source and not as an electron donor for azoreduction. Strain S12 can obtain energy for anaerobic growth by coupling the oxidation of formate or H2 to the reduction of azo compounds. Energy conservation from the oxidation of formate or H2 was proportional to the azoreduction. This energy must be generated from electron transport and oxidative phosphorylation, because there is no known mechanism to generate ATP through substrate-level phosphorylation with formate or H2 as the substrate.


Figure 3
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. Anaerobic growth of S. decolorationis S12 coupled to the reduction of amaranth. (A) Growth of S12 in defined medium with different concentrations of amaranth as the terminal electron acceptor. (B) Growth of S12 in the presence of amaranth (2.0 mM). Microbial growth in the presence of amaranth ({blacksquare}), in the absence of amaranth ({blacklozenge}), and in the absence of an electron donor (*) was monitored, and reduction of amaranth in the presence ({triangleup}) and absence ({blacktriangleup}) of an electron donor was monitored. Experiments were performed in the defined medium under anaerobic conditions, with formate as the electron donor. Cell numbers were determined by DAPI staining and direct counting using epifluorescence microscopy. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Error bars represent standard deviations of triplicate incubations.

Effect of electron acceptors on azoreduction.
Apart from oxygen, strain S12 can grow with several different electron acceptors, including nitrate (NO3), nitrite (NO2), ferric iron (Fe3+), sulfite (SO32–), anthraquinone-2-sulfonate, and AQDS, but not with sulfate (SO42–). Azoreduction of amaranth by S12 was fully inhibited by molecular oxygen and by several typical electron acceptors, including 0.9 mM NO2 and 6.0 mM NO3, but not by 10.0 mM Fe(III). This inhibition may be due to competition for electrons from the electron transport chain.

Experiments with respiratory inhibitors.
The results of studies using respiratory inhibitors offer evidence for a chemiosmotic model of dissimilatory azoreduction in S. decolorationis S12. Azoreduction by S. decolorationis S12 with H2 or formate as the electron donor was almost completely inhibited by 5 µM Cu2+ ions (Fig. 4A), a membrane-impermeable dehydrogenase inhibitor (14, 20), indicating that hydrogenase and formate dehydrogenase are important components of electron transfer. Stigmatellin, a quinone analog able to bind to cytochrome b (15, 31), inhibited anaerobic azoreduction (Fig. 4B), suggesting that a low-potential cytochrome b is involved in the electron transport from the electron donor to the azo dye. It is likely that cytochrome b shuttles electrons between primer dehydrogenases and menaquinone (MK). Dicumarol, which is thought to inhibit electron transport of MK in bacteria (1, 16), also inhibited azoreduction (Fig. 4C). This observation supports MK being an essential compound of electron transport for azoreduction. Furthermore, anaerobic azoreduction was sensitive to metyrapone (Fig. 4D), a specific cytochrome P450 inhibitor (42), indicating that cytochrome P450 plays an important role in anaerobic azoreduction by strain S12. These results show that anaerobic azoreduction by S12 is catalyzed by a multicompound system including a dehydrogenase (hydrogenase), cytochrome b, MK, a P450-type cytochrome, and a deduced terminal azoreductase.


Figure 4
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 4. Effect of respiratory inhibitors on anaerobic azoreduction by S. decolorationis S12. Azoreduction was inhibited by Cu2+ (CuCl2) (A), stigmatellin (B), dicumarol (C), and metyrapone (D). Data are the averages of triplicate incubations with 10 mM formate as the electron donor in the defined medium containing 1 mM amaranth.

Location of the azoreduction enzyme system.
To localize the anaerobic azoreduction enzyme system in S. decolorationis S12, the cytoplasmic, periplasmic, and membranous proteins were isolated from anaerobically grown cells of S12. Equal concentrations of each protein fraction were suspended in phosphate buffer (20 mM Na2HPO4 · 7H2O, 20 mM K2H2PO4, pH 8.0). The azoreduction activity of each cellular fraction was measured in defined medium under anaerobic conditions at 32°C, with lactate, H2, or formate as the electron donor. The cytoplasmic and periplasmic fractions showed very little azoreduction. However, freshly prepared membrane vesicles of S12 did effectively reduce azo compounds with H2, formate, or lactate as the electron donor (Fig. 5). No azoreduction was detected when the membranous protein was treated at 95°C for 10 min before amaranth was added. These results show that the membrane fraction contains all of the essential components required for electron transport from the electron donors to the azo compounds. The capacity for azoreduction was constitutive, as the vesicles could reduce azo compounds even though the organism had been grown with other electron acceptors.


Figure 5
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 5. Anaerobic azoreduction by membranous vesicle of S. decolorationis S12. Experiments were performed in the defined medium under anaerobic conditions at 32°C, with lactate, H2, and formate as the electron donors. All measurements are the averages of three independent incubations, and error bars represent standard deviations of triplicate cultures.


arrow
DISCUSSION
 
Oxidation of electron donors coupled to azoreduction.
Azoreduction is an important process for azo dye degradation. As mentioned in the introduction, many microorganisms are capable of decolorizing azo dyes anaerobically (6, 7, 12, 13, 18, 19, 32, 37). However, while the mechanism of microbial anaerobic azoreduction remains unclear, the redox mediator model of azoreduction is the currently accepted hypothesis. In this hypothesis, the reduction of the azo dye is catalyzed extracellularly by the action of redox mediator compounds, which are either formed during the metabolism of certain substrates or added externally. These mediators enable the transfer of redox equivalents from the bacterial cell membrane to the azo dye. The action between the azo compounds and the redox mediator is a purely chemical redox reaction (19, 33, 38). A previous study has shown that anaerobic reduction of azo dyes by Sphingomonas sp. strain BN6 is linked to the bacterial electron transport chain (19). Results from the current study show that S. decolorationis S12 can reduce a variety of azo dyes by coupling the anaerobic oxidation of formate, lactate, pyruvate, or H2 to azoreduction. Furthermore, the electrons accepted by the azo bond are transferred from the electron donors. These findings suggest that azoreduction under anaerobic conditions is a dissimilatory process and that several dehydrogenases are involved. Moreover, azoreduction by strain S12 under physiological conditions does not depend on supplying any of the redox mediators mentioned above, but azoreduction can be improved by supplying AQDS. Thus, it can be concluded that an external redox mediator is not necessary for azoreduction by strain S12. However, we could not exclude the possibility that S12 may have produced a redox mediator which was used for azoreduction.

Energy conservation from dissimilatory azoreduction.
Over more than 3.5 billion years of evolutionary history, prokaryotes have acquired the ability to use a broad range of electron-accepting substances. Shewanella species are highly advanced among microbes in their ability to exploit these various electron acceptors (40), and S12 has been shown to grow using many different electron acceptors (44). Generally, energy generation is a by-product of electron transfer. Thermodynamic calculations indicate that, per electron transferred, formate or H2 oxidation coupled to azoreduction of amaranth has the potential to yield enough energy to sustain microbial growth (see the supplemental material). The growth data provided here demonstrate that S12 is indeed capable of using the azo bond as a terminal electron acceptor for energy conservation under the growth condition used in this study. It is evident that microbial dissimilatory azoreduction is a respiratory process. We propose that this biochemical reaction process be called azorespiration. This newly recognized form of anaerobic respiration expands the potential electron acceptors known for microbial energy conservation.

Location of dissimilatory azoreduction and electron transportation systems.
To date, Sphingomonas sp. strain BN6 is the only reported organism with an enzymatic system of anaerobic azoreduction. For strain BN6, azo reductase activities were present in both the cytoplasmic and membrane fractions (19). In contrast, anaerobic azoreduction in S12 occurs almost exclusively in the membrane fraction. There was little azo reductase activity in the cytoplasmic and periplasmic fractions. These results provide strong evidence that dissimilatory azoreduction is a process of respiration in microorganisms. In addition, membrane vesicles were capable of azoreduction without an external redox mediator, suggesting that the azoreduction by S12 is a direct enzymatic process. It is possible that azoreduction was catalyzed by an unspecified azoredutase, which may be one of the components of the respiration chain. This is currently under investigation.

One of the basic methods of studying the activity of respiratory chain components is to use electron transport inhibitors. Experiments using specific inhibitors showed that anaerobic azoreduction by the bacterium was catalyzed by a multicomponent system including dehydrogenases, MK, cytochromes, and a deduced terminal azoreductase. A hypothetical chemiosmotic model of azorespiration is shown in Fig. 6. In this model, the membrane-associated, cytoplasmic-oriented formate dehydrogenase or hydrogenase is the primary dehydrogenase. The membrane-bound, putative azoreductase functions as the terminal reductase. The electrons produced by the primary dehydrogenase are transported through the electron transport chain, causing an electrochemical protonmotive force across the membrane, driving ATP synthesis. However, the precise mechanism of microbial anaerobic azorespiration remains to be elucidated.


Figure 6
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 6. Putative chemiosmotic model of the azorespiration electron transport chain in S. decolorationis S12. H2ase, hydrogenase; Fdh, formate dehydrogenase; cyt, cytochrome P450 MKH2, hydroquinone of MK; ARase, azoreductase.

Environmental significance.
Anaerobic respiration by bacteria is an essential metabolic process. Microorganisms are often able to use a diverse range of electron acceptors, depending on the environmental conditions to which they are exposed (34). Under anaerobic conditions, bacteria can respire using diverse noxious substances as terminal electronic acceptors. Novel forms of anaerobic respiration have been and continue to be discovered (23). These new discoveries have environmental and biotechnological significance because these types of biochemical reactions impact the degradation of environmental contaminants and the cycling of organic carbon as well as many inorganic compounds. Furthermore, anaerobic respiration is increasingly recognized as a strategy for the remediation of environments contaminated by priority pollutants (21, 22). In this study, we illustrated that azoreduction by strain S12 is a process of respiration. This newly recognized microbial anaerobic respiration may have important environmental and biotechnological impact on the treatment of dye-containing wastewater and bioremediation of sites contaminated with azo dyes. Based on this study, anaerobic azoreduction by Shewanella strain S12 is a biochemical process coupling the oxidation of electron donors with azoreduction. As such, the addition of electron donors may stimulate the reduction of azo dyes. Usually, there is an abundance of organic substances in activated sludge which can be used as electron donors to support azoreduction; however, a lack of electron donors in the treatment reactor will decrease the rate of azoreduction. Our experiments show that toluene and aniline can also serve as electron donors for anaerobic azoreduction by S12 (data not shown), suggesting that bacteria capable of dissimilatory azoreduction might be able to couple the decomposition of toxic organic substances to the reduction of azo compounds. S. decolorationis S12 is able to grow both aerobically and anaerobically in many different environments and does not cause disease in humans or other organisms (44). These properties make it an ideal bacterium for bioremediation of environments contaminated with azo dyes and other toxic organic substances.

In summary, the experimental results presented in this study strongly suggest that azoreduction by S12 under anaerobic conditions is a new form of microbial respiration. Furthermore, these results demonstrate that rapid and extensive azoreduction can be accomplished by this respiration process and suggest that microbial azorespiration plays a great and direct role in azo dye degradation. Besides revealing a new form of microbial respiration, this discovery leads to a better understanding of the physiology and biochemistry of microbial azoreduction. However, the precise mechanism of microbial anaerobic azorespiration remains to be elucidated. Nonetheless, these findings suggest a strategy for bioremediation of soil and aquatic environments contaminated by azo dyes.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This research was supported by Chinese National Programs for High Technology Research and Development (2003AA214040), Guangdong Provincial Programs for Natural Science Foundation Group (015017), Guangdong Provincial Key Programs for Science and Technology Development (05100365), and the National Natural Science Foundation (30670020 and 3050009).

We thank Joy D. Van Nostrand for critical review of the manuscript and for many helpful suggestions and the other members of our laboratory for encouragement, expertise, and assistance.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Microbial Culture Collection and Application, Guangdong Institute of Microbiology, Guangzhou 510070, China. Phone: 86-20-87684471. Fax: 86-20-87684471. E-mail: guopingsun{at}163.com. Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 3 November 2006. Back

{dagger} Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Arnold, R. G., T. J. Dichristing, and M. R. Hoffmann. 1986. Inhibitor studies of dissimilative Fe(III) reduction by Pseudomonas sp. strain 200 ("Pseudomonas ferrireductans"). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52:281-289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. 2
  3. Bin, Y., Z. Jiti, W. Jing, D. Cuihong, H. Hongman, S. Zhiyong, and B. Yongming. 2004. Expression and characteristics of the gene encoding azoreductase from Rhodobacter sphaeroides AS1.1737. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 236:129-136.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. 3
  5. Blumel, S., and A. Stolz. 2003. Cloning and characterization of the gene coding for the aerobic azoreductase from Pigmentiphaga kullae K24. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 62:186-190.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. 4
  7. Blumel, S., H. J. Knackmuss, and A. Stolz. 2002. Molecular cloning and characterization of the gene coding for the aerobic azoreductase from Xenophilus azovorans KF46F. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:3948-3955.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. 5
  9. Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248-254.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. 6
  11. Bragger, J. L., A. W. Lloyd, S. H. Soozandehfar, S. F. Bloomfield, C. Marriott, and G. P. Martin. 1997. Investigations into the azo reducing activity of a common colonic microorganism. Int. J. Pharm. 157:61-71.[CrossRef]
  12. 7
  13. Brown, J. P. 1981. Reduction of polymeric azo and nitro dyes by intestinal bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41:1283-1286.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. 8
  15. Brown, M. A., and S. C. DeVito. 1993. Predicting azo dye toxicity. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 23:249-324.
  16. 9
  17. Carpentier, W., L. De Smet, J. Van Beeumen, and A. Brigé. 2005. Respiration and growth of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 using vanadate as the sole electron acceptor. J. Bacteriol. 187:3293-3301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. 10
  19. Chen, H., R. F. Wang, and C. E. Cerniglia. 2004. Molecular cloning, over expression, purification, and characterization of an aerobic FMN-dependent azoreductase from Enterococcus faecalis. Protein Expr. Purif. 34:302-310.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. 11
  21. Chung, K. T., and C. E. Cerniglia. 1992. Mutagenicity of azo dyes: structure-activity relationships. Mutat. Res. 77:201-220.
  22. 12
  23. Chung, K. T., G. E. Fulk, and M. Egan. 1978. Reduction of azo dyes by intestinal anaerobes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 35:558-562.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. 13
  25. Dubin, P., and K. L. Wright. 1975. Reduction of azo food dyes in cultures of Proteus vulgaris. Xenobiotica 5:563-571.[Medline]
  26. 14
  27. Fernandez, V. M., M. L. Rua, P. Reyes, R. Cammack, and E. C. Hatchikian. 1989. Inhibition of Desulfovibrio gigas hydrogenase with copper salts and other metal ions. Eur. J. Biochem. 185:449-454.[Medline]
  28. 15
  29. Gerencsér, L., L. Rinyu, L. Kálmán, E. Takahashi, C. A. Wraight, and P. Maróti. 2004. Competitive binding of quinone and antibiotic stigmatellin to reaction centers of photosynthetic bacteria. Acta Biol. Szeged. 48:25-33.
  30. 16
  31. Ghiorse, W. C., and H. L. Ehrlich. 1976. Electron transport components of the MnO2 reductase system and the location of the terminal reductase in a marine Bacillus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 31:977-985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. 17
  33. Heidelberg, J. F., I. T. Paulsen, K. E. Nelson, E. J. Gaidos, W. C. Nelson, T. D. Read, J. A. Eisen, R. Seshadri, N. Ward, B. Methe, R. A. Clayton, T. Meyer, A. Tsapin, J. Scott, M. Beanan, L. Brinkac, S. Daugherty, R. T. DeBoy, R. J. Dodson, A. S. Durkin, D. H. Haft, J. F. Kolonay, R. Madupu, J. D. Peterson, L. A. Umayam, O. White, A. M. Wolf, J. Vamathevan, J. Weidman, M. Impraim, K. Lee, K. Berry, C. Lee, J. Mueller, H. Khouri, J. Gill, T. R. Utterback, L. A. McDonald, T. V. Feldblyum, H. O. Smith, J. C. Venter, K. H. Nealson, and C. M. Fraser. 2002. Genome sequence of the dissimilatory metal ion-reducing bacterium Shewanella oneidensis. Nat. Biotech. 20:1118-1123.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. 18
  35. Hu, T. L. 1994. Decolourization of reactive azo dyes by transformation with Pseudomonas luteola. Bioresour. Technol. 49:47-51.[CrossRef]
  36. 19
  37. Kudlich, M., A. Keck, J. Klein, and A. Stolz. 1997. Localization of the enzyme system involved in anaerobic reduction of azo dyes by Sphingomonas sp. strain BN6 and effect of artificial redox mediators on the rate of azo dye reduction. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:3691-3694.[Abstract]
  38. 20
  39. Louie, T. M., and W. W. Mohn. 1999. Evidence for a chemiosmotic model of dehalorespiration in Desulfomonile tiedjei DCB-1. J. Bacteriol. 181:40-46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. 21
  41. Lovley, D. R. 2003. Cleaning up with genomics applying molecular biology to bioremediation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 1:35-44.[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. 22
  43. Lovley, D. R. 2001. Anaerobes to the rescue. Science 24:1444-1445.
  44. 23
  45. Lovley, D. R., and J. D. Coates. 2000. Novel form of anaerobic respiration of environmental relevance. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 3:252-256.[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. 24
  47. Lovley, D. R., J. D. Coates, E. L. Blunt-Harris, E. J. P. Phillips, and J. C. Woodward. 1996. Humic substances as electron acceptors for microbial respiration. Nature 382:441-448.
  48. 25
  49. Lovely, D. R., E. J. P. Phillips, Y. A. Gorby, and E. R. Landa. 1991. Microbial reduction of uranium. Nature 350:413-416.[CrossRef]
  50. 26
  51. Myers, C. R., and J. M. Myers. 1994. Ferric iron reduction-linked growth yields of Shewanella putrefaciens MR-1. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 76:253-258.[Medline]
  52. 27
  53. Myers, C. R., and K. H. Nealson. 1998. Bacterial manganese reduction and growth with manganese oxide as sole electron acceptor. Science 240:1319-1321.
  54. 28
  55. Myers, C. R., and K. H. Nealson. 1990. Respiration-linked proton translocation coupled to anaerobic reduction of manganese(IV) and iron(III) in Shewanella putrefaciens MR-1. J. Bacteriol. 172:6232-6238.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. 29
  57. Nakanishi, M., C. Yatome, N. Ishida, and Y. Kitade. 2001. Putative ACP phosphodiesterase gene (acpD) encodes an azoreductase. J. Biol. Chem. 276:46394-46399.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. 30
  59. Osborn, M. J., and R. Munson. 1974. Separation of the inner (cytoplasmic) and outer membranes of gram-negative bacteria. Methods Enzymol. 31:642-653.[Medline]
  60. 31
  61. Ouchane, S., I. Agalidis, and C. Astier. 2002. Natural resistance to inhibitors of the ubiquinol cytochrome c oxidoreductase of Rubrivivax gelatinosus: sequence and functional analysis of the cytochrome bc1 complex. J. Bacteriol. 184:3815-3822.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. 32
  63. Rafii, F., W. Franklin, and C. E. Cerniglia. 1990. Azoreductase activity of anaerobic bacteria isolated from human intestinal microflora. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:2146-2151.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. 33
  65. Rau, J., and A. Stolz. 2003. Oxygen-insensitive nitroreductases NfsA and NfsB of Escherichia coli function under anaerobic conditions as lawsone-dependent azo reductases. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:3448-3455.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. 34
  67. Richardson, D. J. 2000. Bacterial respiration: a flexible process for a changing environment. Microbiology 146:551-571.[Free Full Text]
  68. 35
  69. Saltikov, C. W., A. Cifuentes, K. Venkateswaran, and D. K. Newman. 2003. The ars detoxification system is advantageous but not required for As(V) respiration by the genetically tractable Shewanella species strain ANA-3. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:2800-2809.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. 36
  71. Sapra, R., K. Bagramyan, and M. W. W. Adams. 2003. A simple energy-conserving system: proton reduction coupled to proton translocation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:7545-7550.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  72. 37
  73. Scheline, R. R., R. T. Nygaard, and B. Longberg. 1970. Enzymatic reduction of the azo dye, acid yellow, by extracts of Streptococcus faecalis, isolated from rat intestine. Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 8:55-58.[CrossRef][Medline]
  74. 38
  75. Stolz, A. 2001. Basic and applied aspects in the microbial degradation of azo dyes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 56:69-80.[CrossRef][Medline]
  76. 39
  77. Suzuki, Y., T. Yoda, A. Ruhul, and W. Sugiura. 2001. Molecular cloning and characterization of the gene coding for azoreductase from Bacillus sp. OY1-2 isolated from soil. J. Biol. Chem. 276:9059-9065.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  78. 40
  79. Tiejie, J. M. 2002. Shewanella—the environmentally versatile genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 20:1903-1904.
  80. 41
  81. Vargas, M., K. Kashefi, E. L. Blunt-Harris, and D. R. Lovely. 1998. Microbiological evidence for Fe(III) reduction on early Earth. Nature 395:65-67.[CrossRef]
  82. 42
  83. Williams, P. A., J. Cosme, D. M. Vinkovic, A. Ward, H. C. Angove, P. J. Day, C. Vonrhein, I. J. Tickle, and H. Jhoti. 2004. Crystal structures of human cytochrome P450 3A4 bound to metyrapone and progesterone. Science 305:683-686.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  84. 43
  85. Wolin, E. A., M. J. Wolin, and R. S. Wolfe. 1963. Formation of methane by bacterial extracts. J. Biol. Chem. 238:2882-2886.[Free Full Text]
  86. 44
  87. Xu, M., J. Guo, Y. Cen, X. Zhong, W. Cao, and G. Sun. 2005. Shewanella decolorationis sp. nov., a dye-decolorizing bacterium isolated from activated sludge of a waste-water treatment plant. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55:363-368.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  88. 45
  89. Zollinger, H. 1991. Color chemistry, 2nd ed. VCH Publishers, Inc., New York, NY.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2007, p. 64-72, Vol. 73, No. 1
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.01415-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow An author's correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hong, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sun, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hong, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sun, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hong, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sun, G.