Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2007, p. 3630-3636, Vol. 73, No. 11
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.02060-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Molecular Microbiology & Bioenergetics, Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, D-60438 Frankfurt, Germany
Received 31 August 2006/ Accepted 28 March 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
![]() | (1) |
The Wood-Ljungdahl pathway not only uses electrons derived from organic compounds but also hydrogen and thus enables chemolithoautotrophic growth on H2 plus CO2 according to:
![]() | (2) |
In recent years evidence has accumulated that some acetogens can use not only CO2 but also alternative electron acceptors, such as aromatic acrylate groups (the acrylate side chain of aromatic compounds), fumarate, dimethyl sulfoxide, or nitrate (3, 5, 10, 11, 17, 35, 43, 47). A. woodii is known to reduce caffeate, which is a degradation product of lignin and is readily available in its natural habitat. The electrons can be derived from various donors, such as fructose, methanol, or hydrogen, and are used to reduce the double bond in caffeate, yielding hydrocaffeate according to equation 3 (3):
Experiments with cell suspensions of A. woodii revealed that caffeate reduction with hydrogen as the electron donor is coupled to the generation of a primary sodium ion potential across the cytoplasmic membrane that in turn drives ATP synthesis (28). Therefore, this process is also referred to as caffeate respiration. The enzymes involved in hydrogen-mediated caffeate reduction, as well as the Na+-translocating step, remain to be identified.
The ability of A. woodii to reduce at least two different electron acceptors poses a question about the regulation of the utilization of the electron acceptors. Earlier work based on growth experiments suggested that caffeate reduction in A. woodii is not constitutive but is induced in the presence of caffeate (9). However, despite its ecological impact little is known about the regulation of caffeate and CO2 reduction in A. woodii. Here, we addressed the regulation of the utilization of the two electron acceptors in A. woodii at the level of enzyme synthesis, as well as at the enzyme activity level.
|
|
|---|
Preparation of cell suspensions.
All manipulations were done under strictly anaerobic conditions in an anaerobic chamber (Coy, Grass Lake, MI). For analyzing the induction of caffeate reduction cells were grown to an OD600 of 1.8 to 2.0. Cultures were harvested anaerobically by centrifugation (2,700 x g, 15 min, 4°C) and washed three times with imidazole-HCl buffer (50 mM imidazole-HCl, 20 mM MgSO4, 5 mM dithioerythritol, 1 mg/liter of resazurin; pH 7.0). Cells were resuspended in medium to a final protein concentration of 20 to 30 mg/ml under an N2-CO2 atmosphere (80:20, vol/vol). The suspension was kept on ice and used immediately.
For experiments with caffeate-induced cells cultures were grown to an OD600 of 0.3 to 0.4. Then caffeate was added from a 0.2 M stock solution to induce the ability of the cells to reduce caffeate. Cultures were harvested anaerobically at the end of the exponential growth phase (OD600, 1.8 to 2.0) by centrifugation (2,700 x g, 15 min, 4°C) and washed twice with imidazole-HCl buffer (see above). The cells were resuspended in the same buffer to a final protein concentration of 11 to 16 mg/ml. This suspension was kept on ice under an N2 atmosphere and used immediately for the experiments. The protein concentrations of cell suspensions were determined as described previously (42).
Induction of caffeate reduction in cell suspensions.
Experiments were carried out in 120-ml serum bottles containing medium (final volume, 50 ml). The medium was incubated at 30°C under an N2, H2, or H2-CO2 (80:20, vol/vol) atmosphere as specified below. When CO2 was used, the buffer contained 60 mM bicarbonate, unless stated otherwise. Cells were added from the concentrated cell suspension to a final protein concentration of 1 mg/ml. Fructose, methanol, betaine, and H2-CO2 were added as indicated below. After 15 min of incubation, caffeate was added (from a 1 M stock solution in dimethyl sulfoxide) as indicated below.
Experiments with caffeate-induced cell suspensions.
All experiments were performed in 58-ml bottles under an N2 or N2-CO2 (80:20, vol/vol) atmosphere. The mixtures (final volume, 10.5 ml) contained 9.5 ml of imidazole-HCl buffer (pH 7.0) and 1 ml of the concentrated cell suspension or 9 ml of buffer, 1 ml of the concentrated cell suspension, and 0.5 ml of caffeate, ferulate, or p-coumarate (from a 0.2 M stock solution). All suspensions were supplemented with 50 mM NaCl. After incubation of the bottles for 10 min at 30°C in a shaking water bath, the gas atmosphere was changed to H2 or H2-CO2 (80:20, vol/vol) by extensive gassing for 3 min. Then caffeate, ferulate, or p-coumarate was added.
Determination of caffeate concentration.
Samples (0.2 ml) were withdrawn with a syringe, and the cells were removed by centrifugation at 19,000 x g for 10 min. The caffeate concentration was determined photometrically at 312 nm using an extinction coefficient of 13.72 mM1 cm1.
Determination of acetate and fructose concentrations.
Samples (0.5 ml) were withdrawn with a syringe, and the cells were removed by centrifugation (19,000 x g, 10 min). Acetate and fructose concentrations were determined by coupled enzymatic assays using an acetic acid or fructose determination kit from R-biopharm according to the instructions of the manufacturer.
Electrophoresis and Western blotting.
Samples (0.8 ml) were withdrawn and centrifuged at 19,000 x g for 10 min. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed as described by Laemmli (32). Western blotting was performed as described previously (46) using an ECL detection reagent that was either purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences (Boston, MA) or made by using the following solutions: 4 ml of solution A (200 ml containing 0.1 M Tris-HCl [pH 6.8] and 50 mg luminol), 1.2 µl of H2O2 (30%), and 400 µl of solution B (10 ml of dimethyl sulfoxide containing 11 mg of para-hydroxycoumaric acid). Blot membranes were incubated in the solutions for 2 min before exposure to WICORex film (Typon Imaging AG, Burgdorf, Switzerland).
Statistics.
The data presented below are representative of at least three independent experiments, each performed using a different cell culture.
Chemicals and gases.
Chemicals were purchased from Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany), Merck (Ismaning, Germany), or Sigma (Taufkirchen, Germany). The purity of caffeate as determined by high-performance liquid chromatography was >99%. Gases were purchased from Air Liquide (Krefeld, Germany).
|
|
|---|
Caffeate respiration is induced in the presence of bicarbonate and fructose.
When fructose and caffeate were added to cell suspensions incubated in the presence of 60 mM bicarbonate, fructose consumption and acetate formation started immediately and continued for 240 min at a rate of 88 nmol fructose·min1·mg protein1 until the fructose was consumed. At the end of the experiment, a stoichiometry of fructose to acetate of 1:2.75 was obtained. In contrast to acetogenesis, the caffeate concentration did not decrease immediately but remained constant for about 60 min (Fig. 1). Thereafter, caffeate was reduced at a constant rate of 7.7 nmol caffeate·min1·mg protein1 for about 240 min.
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Induction of caffeate respiration during acetogenesis from fructose by A. woodii. Cell suspensions of A. woodii (1.0 mg protein/ml) grown on fructose were incubated under an N2-CO2 atmosphere at 30°C in a shaking water bath in the presence of 20 mM fructose and 2 mM caffeate. At the times indicated, samples were withdrawn and analyzed to determine the caffeate ( ), fructose (), and acetate ( ) concentrations as described in Materials and Methods.
|
These data demonstrate that caffeate reduction is induced during fructose consumption and acetogenesis. After the induction process was completed, caffeate consumption and acetogenesis occurred simultaneously, indicating that the cells did not discriminate between CO2 and caffeate as electron acceptors. This can be concluded from the active acetogenesis during caffeate reduction and the rate of fructose consumption that exceeded by far the amount of fructose required to reduce the 2 mM caffeate present in the assay mixture. Furthermore, variation of the bicarbonate concentration from 0 to 60 mM had no effect on the length of time before caffeate reduction started or on the rates of caffeate reduction (data not shown).
Caffeate respiration is induced in the presence of carbon dioxide and hydrogen.
Upon addition of H2 plus CO2 to cell suspensions prepared from fructose-grown cells, acetate formation started immediately (Fig. 2). As observed before with fructose as the electron donor, caffeate reduction was induced during acetogenesis from H2 plus CO2, again indicating that CO2 does not affect the cells' ability to induce caffeate respiration. This is also reflected by the fact that bicarbonate concentrations ranging from 10 to 60 mM had no influence on the length of time before caffeate reduction started (data not shown). After the ability to reduce caffeate was induced, caffeate was consumed at a rate of 5.1 nmol caffeate·min1·mg protein1, and CO2 and caffeate were used simultaneously as electron acceptors.
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Induction of caffeate respiration during acetogenesis from H2 plus CO2 by cell suspensions of A. woodii. Cell suspensions of A. woodii (1.0 mg protein/ml) grown on fructose were incubated under an H2-CO2 atmosphere at 30°C in a shaking water bath. Caffeate was added from a stock solution. At the times indicated, samples were withdrawn and analyzed to determine the caffeate ( ) and acetate ( ) concentrations as described in Materials and Methods.
|
G0' = 311 kJ/mol) compared to acetogenesis from H2 plus CO2 (
G0' = 105 kJ/mol). Interestingly, when cells were incubated in the absence of CO2 but in the presence of H2, caffeate reduction was impaired (Fig. 3). To analyze this effect, substrate combinations were used. A. woodii is known to grow mixotrophically on fructose and H2 plus CO2 (6). Under these conditions, caffeate respiration was induced, as observed previously (Fig. 4). When CO2 was omitted, fructose consumption and acetogenesis were largely inhibited. This was due to inhibition of fermentation by the presence of hydrogen (6, 8). However, the low rate of acetogenesis was apparently sufficient to induce caffeate respiration. Once caffeate reduction was induced, the rate was two times higher in the absence of CO2 than in the presence of CO2, again indicating that there is simultaneous use of CO2 and caffeate as electron acceptors and competition in both systems for electrons (Fig. 4).
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Time course of caffeate reduction with fructose or hydrogen as the electron donor by cell suspensions of A. woodii incubated in the absence or presence of CO2. Cell suspensions of A. woodii (1.0 mg protein/ml) grown on fructose were preincubated either under an H2 atmosphere ( ), under an H2-CO2 atmosphere ( ), under an N2-CO2 atmosphere with fructose (20 mM) ( ), or under an N2 atmosphere with fructose ( ) for 10 min. Caffeate (2 mM) was added from a stock solution. At the times indicated, samples were withdrawn and analyzed to determine the caffeate concentration as described in Materials and Methods.
|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Induction of caffeate respiration during acetogenesis with H2, CO2, and fructose or with H2 and fructose by cell suspensions of A. woodii. Cells were grown on fructose and harvested, and cell suspensions (1.0 mg protein/ml) were incubated with fructose, H2, and CO2 (solid symbols) or with fructose and H2 (open symbols) at 30°C in a shaking water bath for 10 min. Caffeate (2 mM) was added from a stock solution. At the times indicated, samples were withdrawn and analyzed to determine the caffeate (squares), acetate (triangles), and fructose (circles) concentrations as described in Materials and Methods.
|
![]() | (4) |
![]() | (5) |
When methanol-grown cells were incubated in the presence of methanol and CO2, acetate formation started immediately and proceeded at a rate of 92.6 nmol·min1·mg protein1 for about 7 h. In contrast to what was observed previously with fructose or H2 (plus CO2) as an electron donor, caffeate consumption started only after acetogenesis was complete (Fig. 5A), indicating that CO2 is the preferred electron acceptor during methanol conversion and blocks the induction of caffeate reduction. The same phenomenon was observed with betaine as a substrate. Betaine was consumed much faster than methanol, but caffeate reduction started only after acetogenesis was complete (Fig. 5B).
![]() View larger version (8K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Induction of caffeate respiration during acetogenesis from methanol (A) or betaine (B) by cell suspensions of A. woodii. Cell suspensions of A. woodii (1.0 mg protein/ml) grown on methanol or betaine were incubated at 30°C in a shaking water bath. Caffeate was added from a stock solution. At the times indicated, samples were withdrawn and analyzed to determine the caffeate ( ) and acetate ( ) concentrations as described in Materials and Methods.
|
Upon addition of caffeate to resting cells incubated with H2, with H2 and CO2 (no bicarbonate in the buffer), or with H2, CO2 and bicarbonate, caffeate reduction started immediately in every case and proceeded at identical rates until caffeate was completely reduced (data not shown). At the same time that caffeate was reduced, cells produced acetate from H2 and CO2 or from H2, CO2, and bicarbonate. As expected, the rates of acetogenesis and the final yields were decreased in the presence of caffeate. These experiments clearly demonstrate that caffeate and bicarbonate are used simultaneously as electron acceptors during hydrogen oxidation.
When cells were pregrown on betaine plus caffeate, they produced acetate from betaine immediately after addition of betaine. In contrast, caffeate reduction started only after about 200 min, at a time when acetogenesis was complete. When CO2 (and bicarbonate) was omitted from the assay medium, caffeate reduction started immediately, while acetogenesis was largely impaired (Fig. 6). This experiment demonstrates that CO2 is preferred over caffeate with betaine as the electron donor and indicates that CO2 has a regulatory effect on enzymatic activities necessary for caffeate respiration.
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Caffeate respiration with betaine as the reductant is impaired by CO2. A. woodii was grown with betaine plus caffeate to preinduce the caffeate reduction machinery and harvested. Cell suspensions (1.0 mg protein/ml) were incubated in medium containing 50 mM betaine in the absence (squares) or presence (triangles) of 60 mM bicarbonate at 30°C in a shaking water bath. After preincubation for 10 min, 2 mM caffeate was added from a stock solution. At the times indicated, samples were withdrawn and analyzed to determine the caffeate (solid symbols) and acetate (open symbols) concentrations.
|
![]() View larger version (7K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Reduction of acrylate group-containing compounds by caffeate-preinduced resting cells of A. woodii in the presence of H2 (A) or N2 (B). Cell suspensions of A. woodii (1.35 mg/ml) were incubated in imidazole-HCl buffer at 30°C in a shaking water bath. Caffeate, p-coumarate, and ferulate were added from stock solutions to a final concentration of 10 mM. Samples were withdrawn at the times indicated and analyzed to determine the caffeate ( ), p-coumarate ( ), and ferulate ( ) concentrations.
|
|
|
|---|
As observed previously in A. woodii strain Nzva16, acetogenesis from H2 plus CO2 and H2-dependent caffeate reduction were catalyzed simultaneously by A. woodii DSM1030 (20). In addition, we show here that the induction of caffeate reduction is independent of the bicarbonate concentration. The same is true for induction of caffeate reduction during acetogenesis from fructose. Acetogens compete in their environment for CO2 as an electron sink with, for example, methanogens. Thermodynamically, methanogenesis (
Go' = 135 kJ/mol) is preferred over acetogenesis (
Go' = 105 kJ/mol), and therefore, methanogens would outcompete acetogens (12, 13). The simultaneous use of different electron acceptors enhances the competitiveness of acetogens in their anaerobic environment (14). The simultaneous use of different electron acceptors has been observed before in acetogens. Clostridium formicoaceticum uses fumarate and CO2 simultaneously in undefined medium as electron sinks (35). Ruminococcus productus is capable of growth with ferulate using the methyl group of ferulate as a sole carbon and energy source (36). The acrylate side chain of ferulate is used as a terminal electron acceptor. In the presence of CO2, acetogenesis and ferulate reduction occur simultaneously.
For energetic reasons, the use of the electron acceptor that allows maximal energy conservation should be preferred. This is seen in a number of prokaryotes, and the underlying regulatory mechanisms have been studied best for the ability of Escherichia coli to switch from fermentation to anaerobic respiration with nitrate, fumarate, or dimethyl sulfoxide (48). The best-studied example in the acetogens is M. thermoacetica, which can use CO2 or nitrate as an electron acceptor (17). Nitrate is the preferred electron acceptor for M. thermoacetica, and nitrate reduction is coupled to energy conservation (43, 44). The amount of energy conserved is larger during nitrate reduction than during acetogenesis with O-methyl groups. The redox potential of the CO2/acetate couple is about 0.34 V, whereas the redox potential of NO3/NO2 is 0.42 V. Therefore, the Gibbs free energy change during acetogenesis from H2 plus CO2 is much smaller than the Gibbs free energy change for nitrate reduction (18, 43). Although the thermodynamic basis for the preference of nitrate over CO2 is clear, the regulatory events involved are far from being understood. One detailed study revealed that nitrate blocks the acetyl-CoA pathway in M. thermoacetica at the level of the electron transport pathway (17). The enzymes of the acetyl-CoA pathway were present and their activity was not regulated by nitrate, but a cytochrome b was missing in nitrate-grown cultures. A second study revealed an additional effect of the CO2 concentration. In CO2-sparged cultures grown in the presence of nitrate, methyltransferase and CO dehydrogenase activities were 5- to 10-fold lower, and molecular studies revealed that the regulation of enzymes, as well as electron transport proteins, such as cytochrome b, was on a transcriptional level (1). Nitrate induced the nitrate reductase (1, 17).
The redox potential of the caffeate/hydrocaffeate couple is not known, but based on the assumption that it is similar to the redox potential of the fumarate/succinate couple (E0' = 0.032 V), caffeate reduction is energetically favored over CO2 reduction. This could lead to preferential use of caffeate over CO2, as indeed was observed previously for A. woodii Nzva16 (47). However, we did not observe preferential use of caffeate. Either caffeate and CO2 were used simultaneously (during hydrogen or fructose oxidation) or CO2 was preferred over caffeate during methyl group oxidation. The differences cannot be explained easily but may be due to the different physiologies of the two strains of A. woodii or the culture conditions used. Tschech and Pfenning (47) cultivated A. woodii Nzva16 with 60 mM bicarbonate and limiting amounts of methanol (2 mM), and caffeate was added at a concentration of 6 mM, giving a methanol/caffeate stoichiometry of 1:3. The oxidation of one methyl group yields six electrons, and Tschech and Pfenning observed that the electrons were funneled exclusively to caffeate under these conditions, with no acetate produced. We used 30 times more (60 mM methanol) or 75 times more (50 mM betaine) methyl groups than Tschech and Pfennig used, and it could be that the methyl group concentration plays a role in regulation. In line with this argument is the observation of Davies and Stephens (9), who observed an effect of the growth substrate and electron donor on caffeate reduction. Methanol-grown cells could not use fructose as an electron donor for caffeate reduction, which is surprising since the Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas pathway is constitutive. In addition, even small changes in the culture conditions can have a big impact on the regulation. For example, in undefined media, C. formicoaceticum uses CO2 and fumarate simultaneously, whereas CO2 is preferred in defined media (35).
The caffeate reductase system of A. woodii apparently does not discriminate between caffeate, ferulate, and p-coumarate. In addition, all three compounds were used as inducers for the system. A surprising finding, however, was that caffeate-induced cells were apparently able to demethylate ferulate. It is interesting that Davies and Stephens reported a similar phenomenon: cells grown with fructose plus caffeate were able to use methanol as a reductant for caffeate, and again, the methyltransferase system must have been induced by caffeate (9). O demethylation requires the concerted action of three proteins; methyltransferase I abstracts the methyl group and transfers it to the central cobalt atom in a corrinoid protein, from which it is transferred to tetrahydrofolate by the action of a second methyltransferase. The genes encoding these proteins are (often) organized in an operon, and the expression is induced by the O-methyl compound (15, 16, 29-31, 45). Here, the methyltransferase system was induced by caffeate, a compound that has no O-methyl groups. However, caffeate and O-methyl compounds are both derived from lignin and are present together in anaerobic soils that contain lignin. Therefore, the presence of caffeate might signal the presence of lignin and thus a O-methyl compound to the cells and induce a more global regulatory network involved in utilization of lignin derivatives.
Published ahead of print on 6 April 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»