AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AEM.02398-06v1
73/11/3715    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mouton, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ebert, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mouton, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ebert, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mouton, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ebert, D.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2007, p. 3715-3718, Vol. 73, No. 11
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02398-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

SHORT REPORT

Variable-Number Tandem Repeats as Molecular Markers for Biotypes of Pasteuria ramosa in Daphnia spp.{triangledown}

Laurence Mouton,1* Guang Nong,2 James F. Preston,2 and Dieter Ebert1

Zoologisches Institut der Universität Basel, Evolutionsbiologie, Vesalgasse 1, 4051 Basel, Switzerland,1 Department of Microbiology and Cell Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-07002

Received 11 October 2006/ Accepted 24 March 2007


   ABSTRACT
Top
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 REFERENCES
 
Variable-number tandem repeats (VNTRs) have been identified in populations of Pasteuria ramosa, a castrating endobacterium of Daphnia species. The allelic polymorphisms at 14 loci in laboratory and geographically diverse soil samples showed that VNTRs may serve as biomarkers for the genetic characterization of P. ramosa isolates.


   INTRODUCTION
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
REFERENCES
 
Pasteuria spp. are endospore-forming bacteria that are obligate parasites of cladoceran crustaceans and nematodes that develop through a water- or a soilborne stage (18). Their coevolution with their respective hosts has provided an opportunity to explore the genetic basis of host-parasite relationships in aquatic and soil environments. The type species for the genus is Pasteuria ramosa, which is found in Europe and North America and is related to Bacillus spp. by 16S rRNA gene homology (7). It is an endoparasite of Daphnia species, planktonic crustaceans that play an important role in the food chains of ponds. A single waterborne endospore may infect, geminate, and proliferate in the body cavity of its host to generate up to 80 million endospores. Transmission occurs horizontally with the infection of new hosts by mature spores released from dead infected hosts. The cost of infection is high, since hosts are completely castrated (8). Infective spores can survive for extended periods in soils, where they form long-lasting spore banks (9).

The infectivity of a spore, i.e., the ability of a spore to infect and propagate within a particular specimen of a Daphnia species, is dependent on the lineage of the parasite and the host (4, 6, 14). Until now, studies of the population genetics, evolution, and epidemiology of P. ramosa have been limited by the lack of genetic markers to distinguish among isolates. Sequence information from Pasteuria species is limited primarily to Pasteuria penetrans, a bacterium infecting phytopathogenic nematodes (5, 16, 19, 20). Identification of individual strains of P. ramosa is difficult because molecular methods used for genotype analyses, such as PCR of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA or restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis, are adversely affected by contamination with the DNA of their hosts. Here we have identified genetic markers based on short tandem repeats that may be used to distinguish isolates and to address the evolution of genetic variants in different environments.

Variable-number tandem repeats (VNTRs) comprised of short sequence repeats (SSRs) constitute a rich source of polymorphism and have been used extensively as markers for discrimination between strains within prokaryotic DNAs (12, 21). VNTR loci have even been found in genetically highly homogenous pathogens, such as Bacillus anthracis (1, 10, 13).

In this study, we describe nine VNTRs in noncoding and putative coding regions of the P. ramosa genome. Two laboratory isolates and bacteria from 11 soil samples collected in the United Kingdom, Belgium, and Russia (Table 1) were typed using these markers to assess the extent of polymorphism at these loci.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. P. ramosa isolates used in this study

 
A cosmid library containing 25- to 40-kb inserts was generated using high-molecular-weight DNAs isolated from vegetative cells of the laboratory isolate P1 of Pasteuria ramosa. Screening for marker genes for P. ramosa and Daphnia by PCR indicated that approximately 90% of the DNA was P. ramosa DNA. This library was subjected to pyrosequencing (15) and provided contigs representing 3.6 Mb (the predicted genome size is 4 to 4.5 Mb). We searched for repetitive DNA in these contigs by using Tandem Repeats Finder software (2; http://tandem.bu.edu/trf/trf.html). Short SSRs (repeat units of 3 to 6 nucleotides) were in a minority (6%) compared to repeats harboring 7 to 14 nucleotides (60%) or repeats of >15 nucleotides per unit (34%), which is rather uncommon for the relative abundance of prokaryotic SSRs (21). For DNA polymorphism analysis, we selected 14 SSRs harboring the largest number of repetitions in P1 (Table 2). Eight of these SSRs (indicated with asterisks in Table 2) were located within putative open reading frames (AMIGene Viewer [3; http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/agc/tools/amigene/Form/form.php]), but no significant similarities were found compared to the corresponding amino acid sequences in the protein sequence databases at the National Center of Biotechnology Information database (Bethesda, MD).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. Primer sequences and repeat motif attributes of 14 P. ramosa SSRs

 
Ten primer sets were designed to amplify these 14 SSRs (Table 2) by using Primer3 software (17; http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer3/primer3_www.cgi). Bacterial DNA extraction from infected Daphnia cells was carried out with an EZNA tissue DNA kit (Peqlab) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For pond sediment samples, successful detection of microbial DNA requires adequate purification from the coextracted contaminants that inhibit PCR, such as humic and fulvic acids (22); therefore, we used a SoilMaster DNA extraction kit (Epicentre). Endospores of P. ramosa in pond sediments were subjected to mechanical disruption before extracting the DNA. Bead mill homogenization was carried out with a high-speed (5,000 rpm) bead beater (BioSpec Products, Inc.) after suspending 200 mg of soil samples in 250 µl of soil DNA extraction buffer and 2 µl of proteinase K (50 µg/µl) in tubes containing glass beads (0.5-, 0.1-, and 1-mm diameter). Tubes were subjected to bead beating at 5,000 rpm for one cycle of 10 s, one cycle of 20 s, and three cycles of 30 s successively and then centrifuged at 4,500 rpm for 15 min at 10°C. DNAs were extracted from the supernatant following the kit procedure. PCR amplifications were performed in 25-µl volumes containing 1x PCR buffer [Tris-HCl, pH 8.7, KCl, (NH4)2SO4, 15 mM MgCl2], a 200 µM concentration of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, a 200 nM concentration of each primer, 0.5 U of HotStarTaq DNA polymerase (QIAGEN GmbH), and 2 µl of template DNA. The PCR cycling conditions were as follows: 15 min at 94°C; 42 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 50°C (primer-specific annealing temperature), and 1 min at 72°C; and a final elongation step for 10 min at 72°C.

Polymorphism was checked for each of the 14 SSRs in the two laboratory isolates by sequencing the PCR products (Fasteris SA, Inc.). Five SSRs, all situated within putative coding regions, did not show variation in the number of repeats, an observation which has been confirmed with four other laboratory isolates (originating from the United States, United Kingdom, Russia, and Belgium). The nine other SSRs (shown in bold in Table 2) showed polymorphisms and were chosen to study diversity in field samples. For genotyping, forward primers were fluorescently labeled. Allele sizes were determined by separation of the PCR products in an ABI PRISM 310 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Fragment lengths were assigned by Genemapper, using a GeneScan-500 (6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine) size standard. The results are presented in Table 3. In some samples, more than one allele was found for a given primer set. The allele numbers ranged from three for Pr SSR3 to eight for Pr SSR4. We did not find any correlation between the repeat copy number and the allelic variability (Spearman rank test; rho = –0.42; P = 0.26). For some loci, e.g., Pr SSR3, distinct alleles were found for each of the three geographical locations studied. Others showed polymorphism within a studied location (Pr SSR4) or between two samples collected from the same pond during successive years (Pr SSR6, Oxford, pond 8).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 3. Amplicon sizes of fragments containing SSRs found in P. ramosa isolates

 
For the sequence amplified by the primer set Pr2, which was located within an open reading frame, length variation did not change the reading frame for the putative encoded protein. However, it is known that VNTRs have the potential to affect metabolic regulation, antigenic variation, or environmental adaptation (11). Moreover, extragenic VNTRs can have pronounced effects on adjacent gene expression (21). The biological significance of P. ramosa VNTRs is unknown, but the identification of VNTRs can be a starting point for such research.

These VNTRs are the first molecular markers reported that have allowed the differentiation of populations of Pasteuria spp. as a function of environmental distribution. Moreover, the use of VNTRs for analyzing P. ramosa spore diversity in sediment samples raises the possibility of in situ analysis without isolating bacteria. This approach will facilitate epidemiological, genetic, and ecological studies of this nonculturable bacterium and will be valuable in determining the basis for host preference and virulence of Pasteuria spp. as parasites of phytopathogenic nematodes.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Isabelle Colson and Louis Du Pasquier for helpful advice and Tom Little, Ellen Decaestecker, and Lev Yampolsky for providing samples.

This work was supported by the Swiss Nationalfonds and the Freiwilige Akademische Geselschaft, Basel, Switzerland, and by USDA/CSREES project 50554, USDA/CSREES multistate project NE1019, and the University of Florida Agricultural Experiment Station under CRIS projects FLA-MCS-04353 and FLA-MCS-04080.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Zoologisches Institut der Universität Basel, Evolutionsbiologie, Vesalgasse 1, 4051 Basel, Switzerland. Phone: 41 (0)61 267 03 75. Fax: 41 (0)61 267 03 62. E-mail: laurence.mouton{at}unibas.ch Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 30 March 2007. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Andersen, G. L., J. M. Simchock, and K. H. Wilson. 1996. Identification of a region of genetic variability among Bacillus anthracis strains and related species. J. Bacteriol. 178:377-384.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Benson, G. 1999. Tandem Repeats Finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:573-580.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Bocs, S., S. Cruveiller, D. Vallenet, G. Nuel, and C. Médigue. 2003. AMIGENE: annotation of microbial genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 13:3723-3726.
  4. Carius, H. J., T. Little, and D. Ebert. 2001. Genetic variation in a host-parasite association: potential for coevolution and frequency-dependent selection. Evolution 55:1146-1152.[Medline]
  5. Charles, L., I. Carbone, K. G. Davies, D. Bird, M. Burke, B. R. Kerry, and C. H. Opperman. 2005. Phylogenetic analysis of Pasteuria penetrans by use of multiple genetic loci. J. Bacteriol. 187:5700-5708.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Decaestecker, E., A. Vergote, D. Ebert, and L. De Meester. 2003. Evidence for strong host-clone-parasite interactions in the Daphnia microparasite system. Evolution 57:784-792.[Medline]
  7. Duncan, A. B., S. E. Mitchell, and T. J. Little. 2006. Parasite-mediated selection and the role of sex and diapause in Daphnia. J. Evol. Biol. 19:1183-1189.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Ebert, D. 2005. Ecology, epidemiology, and evolution of parasitism in Daphnia. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD.
  9. Ebert, D., P. Rainey, T. M. Embley, and D. Scholz. 1996. Development, life cycle, ultrastructure and phylogenetic position of Pasteuria ramosa Metchnikoff 1888: rediscovery of an obligate endoparasite of Daphnia magna Straus. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351:1689-1701.[CrossRef]
  10. Jackson, P. J., E. A. Walthers, A. S. Kalif, K. L. Richmond, D. M. Adair, K. K. Hill, C. R. Kuske, G. L. Andersen, K. H. Wilson, M. Hugh-Jones, and P. Keim. 1997. Characterization of the variable-number tandem repeats in vrrA from different Bacillus anthracis isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:1400-1405.[Abstract]
  11. Li, Y.-C., A. B. Korol, T. Fahima, and E. Nevo. 2004. Microsatellites within genes: structure, function, and evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:991-1007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Lindstedt, B. A. 2005. Multiple-locus variable number tandem repeats analysis for genetic fingerprinting of pathogenic bacteria. Electrophoresis 26:2567-2582.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Lista, F., G. Faggioni, S. Valjevac, A. Ciammaruconi, J. Vaissaire, C. le Doujet, O. Gorge, R. De Santis, A. Carattoli, A. Ciervo, A. Fasanella, F. Orsini, R. D'Amelio, C. Pourcel, A. Cassone, and G. Vergnaud. 2006. Genotyping of Bacillus anthracis strains based on automated capillary 25-loci multiple locus variable-number tandem repeats analysis. BMC Microbiol. 6:33.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Little, T. J., K. Watt, and D. Ebert. 2006. Parasite-host specificity: experimental studies on the basis of parasite adaptation. Evolution 60:31-38.[Medline]
  15. Margulies, M., M. Egholm, W. E. Altman, S. Attiya, J. S. Bader, L. A. Bemben, J. Berka, M. S. Braverman, Y.-J. Chen, Z. Chen, S. B. Dewell, L. Du, J. M. Fierro, X. V. Gomes, B. C. Godwin, W. He, S. Helgesen, C. H. Ho, G. P. Irzyk, S. C. Jando, M. L. I. Alenquer, T. P. Jarvie, K. B. Jirage, J.-B. Kim, J. R. Knight, J. R. Lanza, J. H. Leamon, S. M. Lefkowitz, M. Lei, J. Li, K. L. Lohman, H. Lu, V. B. Makhijani, K. E. McDade, M. P. McKenna, E. W. Myers, E. Nickerson, J. R. Nobile, R. Plant, B. P. Puc, M. T. Ronan, G. T. Roth, G. J. Sarkis, J. F. Simons, J. W. Simpson, M. Srinivasan, K. R. Tartaro, A. Tomasz, K. A. Vogt, G. A. Volkmer, S. H. Wang, Y. Wang, M. P. Weiner, P. Yu, R. F. Begley, and M. Rothberg. 2005. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437:376-380.[Medline]
  16. Preston, J. F., J. E. Maruniak, G. Nong, J. A. Brito, L. M. Schmidt, and R. M. Giblin-Davis. 2003. Pasteuria spp.: systematics and phylogeny of these bacterial parasites of phytopathogenic nematodes. J. Nematol. 35:198-207.
  17. Rozen, S., and H. J. Skaletsky. 2000. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol. Biol. 132:365-386.[Medline]
  18. Sayre, R. M. 1993. Pasteuria, Metchnikoff, 1888, p. 101-112. In J. A. Hoch and R. Losick (ed.), Bacillus subtilis and other gram-positive bacteria: biochemistry, physiology, and molecular genetics. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
  19. Sturhan, D., T. S. Shutova, V. N. Akimov, and S. A. Subbotin. 2005. Occurrence, hosts, morphology, and molecular characterisation of Pasteuria bacteria parasitic in nematodes of the family Plectidae. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 88:17-26.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Trotter, J. R., and A. H. Bishop. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis and confirmation of the endospore-forming nature of Pasteuria penetrans based on the spo0A gene. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 225:249-256.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. van Belkum, A., S. Scherer, L. van Alphen, and H. Verbrugh. 1998. Short-sequence DNA repeats in prokaryotic genomes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:275-293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Wilson, I. G. 1997. Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:3741-3751.[Medline]

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2007, p. 3715-3718, Vol. 73, No. 11
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02398-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AEM.02398-06v1
73/11/3715    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mouton, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ebert, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mouton, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ebert, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mouton, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ebert, D.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals