![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering,1 Department of Biology,2 Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, 220 Jack E. Brown Building, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-3122,3 Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 207424
Received 13 February 2007/ Accepted 26 April 2007
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TopABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Other examples that confirm the importance of cell signaling for bacterial biofilm formation include the control of exopolysaccharide synthesis by quorum-sensing signals in Vibrio cholerae (22). In addition, AHLs control biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10) and Serratia liquefaciens (36), and we have found that in vitro-synthesized AI-2 directly stimulates E. coli biofilm formation (20, 26). AI-2 has also been shown to control mutualistic biofilm formation (41, 55).
Extracellular indole is found at high concentrations (over 600 µM) when E. coli is grown in rich medium (12, 71) and was identified initially as a stationary-phase signal that controls cysK, astD, tnaB, and gabT (3) as well as tnaAL and phoABU (53). Recently, indole signaling has been shown to link plasmid multimerization and cell division (9), and indole was found to be a nontoxic interspecies signal that decreases biofilm formation in E. coli and increases the biofilms of P. aeruginosa and P. fluorescens (even though these pseudomonads do not produce this signal) (36a). We found that, in a manner analogous to that in which AHL signals bind SdiA (43, 78) and control biofilm formation in E. coli (36a), indole controls biofilms by inducing the AHL sensor of E. coli, SdiA, which influences cell motility and acid resistance (36a), even though E. coli does not produce AHL signals (43). Beyond biofilms, indole has been shown to control multidrug exporters (e.g., acrDE and cusB) in E. coli K-12 (28), to regulate the pathogenicity island of enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) (1), and to repress gadX of E. coli K-12 (36a), which activates virulence in EHEC (44).
Here, we focus on EHEC since it colonizes the large intestine, where its Shiga toxins cause hemorrhagic colitis and hemolytic-uremic syndrome (61). There are over 73,000 EHEC infections annually in the United States, which leads to 2,000 hospitalizations and 60 deaths, the economic cost of which is $405 million (18). It has been reported that EHEC forms biofilm on various surfaces (57, 69), and sloughing of the biofilm may cause contamination (57); however, an effective means of preventing EHEC biofilm formation has not been elucidated, and there is no effective treatment for EHEC infections, since antibiotic treatment increases the risk of hemolytic-uremic syndrome and renal failure (68, 73). We also tested the effect of hydroxylindoles on P. aeruginosa PAO1 since this strain is an opportunistic human pathogen (25).
Based on this proven competition for cell signals and given that indole controls biofilms (36a) and is present at up to 700 µM (12), we hypothesized that hydroxylated indoles (Fig. 1) may play a role in biofilm formation since many bacterial oxygenases, such as Pseudomonas putida PpG7 (15), Ralstonia pickettii PKO1 (16), Pseudomonas mendocina KR1 (67), and Burkholderia cepacia G4 (56), readily convert indole to oxidized compounds, such as 2-hydroxyindole, 3-hydroxyindole, 4-hydroxyindole, isatin, indigo, isoindigo, and indirubin (56). Using crystal violet staining and a continuous-flow chamber to study biofilm formation along with DNA microarrays to investigate the global transcriptome response, we show here that hydroxyindoles and isatin are interspecies biofilm signals that affect EHEC, E. coli K-12, and P. aeruginosa PAO1 by controlling biofilm-related genes, including those for AI-2 transport, indole synthesis, flagellar synthesis, and cysteine regulation. The genetic basis of EHEC biofilm formation was also investigated so that the impact of hydroxyindole signals on biofilm genes could be better interpreted.
|
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TopABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
|
Flow chamber biofilm experiments.
The inoculum and biofilm growth medium was LB supplemented with 300 µg/ml erythromycin to maintain pCM18 (24) and thus to retain the constitutive green fluorescent protein (GFP) vector for visualizing the biofilm. The biofilm was formed at 30°C in a continuous-flow chamber that consisted of a standard glass microscope slide on one side and a plastic coverslip on the other side, with dimensions of 47.5 mm by 12.7 mm and a 1.6-mm gap between the surfaces (BST model FC81; Biosurface Technologies Corp., Bozeman, MT), and was visualized with confocal microscopy as described previously (74). The inocula were diluted to a turbidity of 0.2 at 600 nm and used to seed the flow cell for 2 h at 10 ml/h before fresh LB erythromycin medium was added at the same flow rate. To study the effect of indole and 7-hydroxyindole on biofilm formation, the compounds were dissolved in DMF and added at 1,000 µM in the continuous feed upon inoculation; DMF was added as the negative control to the no-hydroxyindole flow chamber. The initial inoculum was 1.9 x 108 to 4.7 x 108 cells/ml. Each flow chamber experiment was repeated two times (six experiments). A dispersion experiment was also performed with 7-hydroxyindole by adding 1,000 µM in the 10-ml/h feed after biofilm formation for 24 h in LB erythromycin medium in the absence of hydroxyindole. GFP allowed visualization of the EHEC biofilm by excitation with an Ar laser at 488 nm (emission, 500 to 600 nm), using a TCS SP5 scanning confocal laser microscope with a 63x HCX PL FLUOTAR L dry objective, a correction collar, and a numerical aperture of 0.7 (Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany).
Color confocal flow cell images were converted to gray scale (74), and biomass, substratum coverage, surface roughness, and mean thickness were determined using COMSTAT image-processing software (27) as described previously (74). For each experiment, nine different random positions were chosen for microscope analysis, and 25 images were processed for each point. Values are means of data from the different positions at the same time point, and standard deviations were calculated based on these mean values for each position. Simulated three-dimensional images were obtained using IMARIS (BITplane, Zurich, Switzerland). Twenty-five pictures were processed for each three-dimensional image.
Motility assay.
LB overnight cultures were used to assay motility in plates containing 1% tryptone, 0.25% NaCl, and 0.3% agar (62) by measuring halos at 20 h at 37°C. When the effect of isatin and 7-hydroxyindole on motility was tested, isatin (50 µM) and 7-hydroxyindole (1,000 µM) dissolved in DMF were added to the motility agar. DMF (0.1%) was added as the negative control. Each experiment was performed two times using two independent cultures, with each culture evaluated in triplicate.
Biofilm total RNA isolation for DNA microarrays.
For the microarray experiments, 10 g glass wool (Corning Glass Works, Corning, NY) was used to form biofilms (51) in 250 ml of LB in 1-liter Erlenmeyer shake flasks which were inoculated with overnight cultures that were diluted 1:167. 7-Hydroxyindole (1,000 µM) in 250 µl DMF, isatin (250 µM) in 250 µl DMF, or 250 µl DMF alone was added. The cells were shaken at 250 rpm and 30°C for 7 h to form biofilms on the glass wool. The glass wool was removed from the culture quickly and gently washed two times in 100 ml 0.85% NaCl buffer at 0°C (less than 30 seconds). Biofilm cells were removed from glass wool by sonication for 2 min in 200 ml of 0.85% NaCl buffer at 0°C, and cell pellets were stored at –80°C until used. RNA was isolated from the planktonic and biofilm cells as described previously (51).
DNA microarrays.
An E. coli GeneChip 2.0 genome array (product no. 900551; Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) was used to study the differential gene expression profile of the EHEC biofilm after addition of 7-hydroxyindole and isatin as described in the gene expression technical manual; the array contains 10,208 probe sets for open reading frames, rRNA, tRNA, and intergenic regions for four E. coli strains: MG1655, CFT073, O157:H7-Sakai, and O157:H7-EDL933 (EDL933 was used in this study). Hybridization was performed for 16 h, and the total cell intensity was scaled automatically in the software to an average value of 500. The data were inspected for quality and analyzed according to the procedures described in Data Analysis Fundamentals, which includes use of premixed polyadenylated transcripts of the Bacillus subtilis genes (lys, phe, thr, and dap) at different concentrations. Genes were identified as differentially expressed if the change in P value was less than 0.05 and the expression ratio was greater than threefold for biofilm versus planktonic cells, twofold for 7-hydroxyindole, or fourfold for isatin, since the standard deviations were 2.3 for biofilm versus planktonic cells, 1.5 for 7-hydroxyindole addition, and 3.9 for isatin addition. Gene functions were obtained from the Affymetrix-NetAffx analysis center.
Real-time PCR.
To corroborate the DNA microarray data, the transcription levels of four genes were quantified using real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) (70). The same total RNA used for the Affymetrix microarrays was used for these studies. The primers were designed using PrimerQuest online software (Table 2). The real-time RT-PCR was performed using an iScript one-step RT-PCR kit with SYBR green (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA) on a MyiQ single-color real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The threshold cycles, as calculated by the MyiQ optical system software (Bio-Rad Laboratories), were used to determine the relative changes between the samples. The experiments were run in triplicate in 20 µl, and 50 ng of total RNA was used for each reaction, with the final forward and reverse primer concentrations at 0.5 µM each. After amplification, template specificity was ensured by using melting-curve analysis. rrsG was used as the housekeeping gene for normalizing the data.
|
Extracellular and intracellular indole concentrations from cells in LB medium were measured spectrophotometrically in duplicate as described previously (12), by modifying the protocol of Kawamura-Sato et al. (34). Also, the spectrophotometric indole assay was corroborated with reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a 100- by 4.6-mm Chromolith Performance RP-18e column (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and gradient elution, with H2O-0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile as the mobile phases, at a flow rate of 1 ml/min (65:35 for 0 to 5 min, 35:65 for 5 to 12 min, and 65:35 at 12 min). Under these conditions, the retention times and the absorbance maxima were 3.6 min/264 nm for 7-hydroxyindole and 5.9 min/271 nm for indole.
E. coli UT481 harboring pCX39 (ftsQ2p::lacZ) (19) was grown at 30°C with 100 µg ampicillin/ml from diluted overnight cultures to a turbidity of 2 at 600 nm. The ß-galactosidase activities were calculated based on a protein concentration of 0.31 mg protein/ml/OD600. A modified Lowry protein assay kit from Pierce Biotechnology (Rockford, IL) was used to measure the total protein content.
7-Hydroxyindole degradation.
For the degradation of 7-hydroxyindole, overnight EHEC cultures grown in LB were diluted to a turbidity at 600 nm of 0.05 and were regrown in LB with 1,000 µM 7-hydroxyindole for 24 h at 30°C at 250 rpm. As a negative control, autoclaved cells at a turbidity of 0.05 were contacted with 7-hydroxyindole under the same conditions to confirm that there was no evaporation or adsorption. To confirm the lack of hydroxyindole production from either indole or 7-hydroxyindole by EHEC, exponentially grown cells (OD600, 
2.0) were harvested and resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4; OD600, 10.0) and were contacted with 1,000 µM indole or 7-hydroxyindole for 1 h. Each experiment was performed two times using two independent cultures.
Microarray data accession number.
The expression data for the biofilm samples were deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through accession number GSE6195 (4, 14).
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TopABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Toxicity.
To test the toxicities of hydroxyindoles on EHEC, indole, 5-hydroxyindole, 7-hydroxyindole, and isatin were tested in LB at 37°C. In the absence of hydroxyindoles, the specific growth rate was 1.43 ± 0.09/h, whereas the growth rates were 1.38 ± 0.01/h with 1,000 µM indole, 1.48 ± 0.08/h with 1,000 µM 5-hydroxyindole, 1.14 ± 0.03/h with 1,000 µM 7-hydroxyindole, and 1.44 ± 0.04/h with 250 µM isatin. Hence, these indigoids do not significantly change the specific growth rate of EHEC. For 5-hydroxyindole, concentrations as high as 2,000 µM did not affect cell growth (1.40 ± 0.05/h). In addition, indole, 5-hydroxyindole, 7-hydroxyindole, and isatin at 500 µM were not toxic to P. aeruginosa PAO1.
Hydroxyindoles inhibit and stimulate EHEC biofilm formation.
In the absence of hydroxyindoles, it was observed that EHEC formed robust biofilms at 30°C and at 37°C after 24 h although those at 30°C were larger; hence, all the biofilm results here are reported at 30°C. Since indole (36a) and hydroxyindoles were not toxic to EHEC, we screened various hydroxyindoles (Fig. 1) for their abilities to inhibit EHEC in 96-well plates in LB for 9 h at 30°C (similar results were found at 37°C): 2-hydroxyindole, 4-hydroxyindole, 5-hydroxyindole, 6-hydroxyindole, 7-hydroxyindole, and isatin were screened at 500 µM, and indigo, isoindigo, and indirubin were screened at 250 µM since they were insoluble in water above 250 µM. We chose concentrations of 250 to 1,000 µM since EHEC produced 362 ± 3 µM indole after 8 h and K-12 produced 403 ± 8 µM, as found through two independent assays. Indole, 5-hydroxyindole, and 7-hydroxyindole were the most effective at reducing EHEC biofilm formation (more than 50%), 4-hydroxyindole decreased biofilm by about 50%, and isatin increased EHEC biofilm (data not shown). After the preliminary screening, 1,000 µM concentrations of indole, 2-hydroxyindole, 5-indroxyindole, and 7-hydroxyindole as well as 250 µM isatin and isoindigo were tested for their impacts on biofilm formation of EHEC in LB at 30°C for 7 h. Biofilm formation was clearly inhibited by indole (18-fold), 5-hydroxyindole (11-fold), and 7-hydroxyindole (27-fold), whereas biofilm formation was stimulated by isatin (4-fold) and was not affected by 2-hydroxyindole and isoindigo (Fig. 1). Furthermore, isatin from 0 to 1,000 µM stimulated biofilm formation in a dose-dependent manner, and 7-hydroxyindole from 0 to 2,000 µM inhibited biofilm formation in a dose-dependent manner (data not shown). Therefore, use of double hydroxylation of indole to form isatin increased biofilm formation whereas the position of the single hydroxyl group had a profound effect on the efficacies of these biofilm inhibitors.
The effects of 7-hydroxyindole, the most potent biofilm inhibitor out of the 9 tested hydroxyindoles, and indole were investigated using a more rigorous continuous-flow chamber with EHEC in LB medium at 30°C. As shown in Fig. 2A, EHEC forms robust biofilms with undulating towers interspersed with water channels in rich medium at 30°C at 24 h. To our knowledge, this is the first EHEC biofilm image in a continuous-flow chamber. Upon addition of indole at 1,000 µM, biofilm formation was reduced and consisted of individual slender microcolonies (Fig. 2B). Upon addition of 7-hydroxyindole at 1,000 µM, the microcolonies became significantly smaller, scattered towers (Fig. 2C). These visual results were quantified using COMSTAT, indicating that addition of indole reduced biofilm mass 6-fold (7.9 ± 3 versus 46 ± 6 µm3/µm2) and reduced mean biofilm thickness 4-fold (14 ± 5 versus 55 ± 5 µm), and addition of 7-hydroxyindole reduced biofilm mass 10-fold (4.5 ± 3 versus 46 ± 6 µm3/µm2) and reduced mean biofilm thickness 5.5-fold (10 ± 5 versus 55 ± 5 µm). Hence, 7-hydroxyindole was more effective than indole in decreasing EHEC biofilms. The results for the two independent experiments using the flow chamber for each application of DMF alone, indole, and 7-hydroxyindole were consistent.
|
To investigate whether 7-hydroxyindole disperses the existing strong biofilm, 7-hydroxyindole (1,000 µM) was added after biofilm formation for 24 h in LB. During the following 24 h, there was no new biofilm formed; however, no significant dispersion was observed (data not shown).
Hydroxyindoles inhibit E. coli K-12 biofilm and stimulate P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm.
Along with the result for EHEC, the effect of hydroxyindoles on the biofilm formation of E. coli K-12 BW25113 was evaluated using the crystal violet assay. 5-Hydroxyindole and 7-hydroxyindole significantly inhibited E. coli K-12 biofilm formation, as with EHEC (Fig. 3A). However, isatin did not affect E. coli K-12 biofilm formation significantly (Fig. 3A), whereas isatin increased EHEC biofilm. Since E. coli K-12 produces high concentrations of extracellular indole when E. coli is grown in rich medium (over 600 µM) (12, 71), the levels of extracellular indole were measured from E. coli K-12 and EHEC shake flasks at 30°C for 24 h. E. coli K-12 produced 401 ± 11 µM indole, and EHEC produced 308 ± 12 µM indole at 24 h. The lower concentrations of extracellular indole for EHEC than for E. coli K-12 may partially explain the higher level of biofilm formation for EHEC than for E. coli K-12 (crystal violet density, 1.76 ± 0.15 versus 0.37 ± 0.04 at 30°C at 24 h).
|
Differential gene expression in 7-h EHEC biofilms.
To investigate the global genetic basis of hydroxyindole regulation of EHEC biofilm formation, DNA microarrays were first used to determine differential gene expression for EHEC biofilm cells versus planktonic cells. It was found that 402 genes were regulated significantly (more than threefold) in biofilms; 119 genes were induced, and 283 were repressed. Most noticeable was that in biofilm cells, 20 pathogenic genes of the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) operon (a total of 54 genes in EDL933) (48) were highly repressed (3- to 11-fold) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Also, 13 genes of the wca operon (wcaABCDEFGHIJKL and rcsA) that are involved in colanic acid synthesis and biofilm formation (50) and 6 fimbrial genes (fimB, ycbQRS, ybgD, and Z1538) were repressed in the biofilm cells (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Nitrate reductase genes (narGHIJK) and the galactitol phosphotransferase (PTS) family of genes (agaVWYZ) that are involved in the synthesis of dihydroxyacetone phosphate (8) were both induced in the biofilm cells (see Table S1 in the supplemental material).
Since EHEC from an aggregative colony forms more biofilm than cells from a smooth colony (69), aggregation of EHEC and E. coli K-12 was also measured in LB at 30°C for 24 h. EHEC formed sevenfold more aggregates than E. coli K-12, which suggests that the highly aggregative behavior of EHEC may be related to its ability to form robust biofilms.
Differential gene expression with 7-hydroxyindole in 7-h EHEC biofilms.
Since hydroxyindoles affected biofilm formation (Fig. 1 and 2), we focused on differential gene expression in the biofilm itself rather than on planktonic cells. 7-Hydroxyindole (1,000 µM) significantly regulated (more than twofold) 347 genes, with 93 genes induced and 254 genes repressed (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Among the repressed genes, 12 genes related to purine nucleotide biosynthesis (purBCDEFHKLMNRT) were repressed 3- to 12-fold; previously, we found that AI-2 repressed the purDEFHKMT operon in K-12 (52). In addition, genes related to cysteine biosynthesis (cysADIJPU) were repressed 4- to 11-fold, and previously, we found that the nontoxic biofilm inhibitor ursolic acid repressed cysDJK (54). Carbamoyl phosphate synthetase genes (carAB) were also repressed (see Table S1 in the supplemental material).
Although indole inhibits E. coli K-12 biofilm formation through SdiA (36a), 7-hydroxyindole did not change sdiA expression (via microarrays) in EHEC biofilm. To investigate this further, transcription of the SdiA-controlled promoter ftsQ2p (19) was investigated using a ß-galactosidase reporter; unlike indole (36a), neither 7-hydroxyindole nor isatin altered ftsQ2p expression significantly. Hence, these hydroxyindoles do not appear to work through SdiA.
Among the induced genes were ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase operon genes (nrdHIEF), propionate metabolism genes (prpCDE), nitrate reductases (narVZ), the biofilm stress regulator ycfR (80), and a hypothetical gene (yhcN). Also repressed were hydrogen uptake genes (hyaABCDEF) and motility-related genes (fliC, c1936) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material).
To confirm the presence of 7-hydroxyindole, the extracellular 7-hydroxyindole concentration was measured using HPLC when the biofilm cells were prepared for the microarray experiment. The level of 7-hydroxyindole was 550 µM in a shake flask at 7 h, which matches well with the extracellular 7-hydroxyindole (540 µM) concentration found in the flow chamber at 24 h.
Motility and 7-hydroxyindole.
Since it has been reported that motility is essential for initial cell attachment in E. coli biofilm formation (49) and since the microarray data showed that several flagellar genes (c1936, fliC, and motB) were repressed by 7-hydroxyindole (see Table S1 in the supplemental material), the motility of EHEC was tested using a swimming assay (62). 7-Hydroxyindole decreased motility by 53% (2.3 ± 0.5 cm without hydroxyindole versus 1.1 ± 0.1 cm with 1,000 µM 7-hydroxyindole after 20 h). Therefore, the reduction in cell motility upon addition of 7-hydroxyindole may contribute to the inhibition of EHEC biofilm formation.
Cysteine metabolism and 7-hydroxyindole.
Since 7-hydroxyindole repressed the cysteine synthesis operon cysADEIJP 4- to 11-fold (see Table S1 in the supplemental material), we tested the effect of overproducing CysB via pCA24N-cysB+ in an E. coli K-12 cysB mutant while adding hydroxyindoles. CysB positively regulates the biosynthesis of cysteine in E. coli (46), and deletion of cysB increased biofilm formation (Fig. 4), as has been previously reported (54). Addition of 1,000 µM 7-hydroxyindole to the cysB mutant resulted in a 1.8-fold reduction of biofilm (Fig. 4), while addition of 1,000 µM 7-hydroxyindole to the K-12 wild type resulted in a 7.7-fold reduction of biofilm (Fig. 4); hence, 7-hydroxyindole is less effective in the absence of CysB. Also, induction of cysB (via addition of 1 mM IPTG (isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside) to induce cysB+ from pCA24N-cysB+) in the presence of 1,000 µM 7-hydroxyindole resulted in a 4.7-fold greater reduction in biofilm (Fig. 4). Similar results were found with EHEC that overproduces CysB from pCA24N-cysB+. Expression of cysB with 1 mM IPTG made 1,000 µM 7-hydroxyindole 10-fold ± 3-fold more effective in reducing biofilm formation (note that these experiments differ from those for Fig. 1, which lacked the cysB+ plasmid and were conducted at 7 h). Hence, overproducing CysB dramatically improved the effectiveness of 7-hydroxyindole, which implies that this biofilm inhibitor works through the cysteine biosynthesis pathway.
|
The genes most significantly induced by isatin were flagellar genes (flgABCDEFGHIJK and fliAEFGILMNOPQ), 44 various transport genes (e.g., proVWX and cirA), and treBC, which encode the trehalose PTS permease and trehalose-6-phosphate hydrolase (6). Based on the induction of the flagellar genes, we investigated the effect of isatin addition (50 µM) on motility and found that it was increased by 47% ± 8%; therefore, the increase in cell motility upon addition of isatin may contribute to the stimulation of EHEC biofilm formation. Note that among the genes differentially expressed in response to isatin (increased biofilm) and 7-hydroxyindole (decreased biofilm), the motility-related genes (fliC, c1936, and motAB), nitrate reductase genes (narUVWYZ), propionate metabolism genes (prpBCDE), carbamoyl phosphate synthetase genes (carAB), transport genes (yieG, lldP, uraA, and sdaC) and phoH, ompF, and fis genes were oppositely regulated (see Table S1 in the supplemental material).
Isatin, indole, and AI-2.
Based on the DNA microarray data with isatin, we investigated indole concentrations with 250 µM isatin since tnaA was repressed sevenfold with this compound (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). It was found that isatin represses extracellular indole concentrations 20-fold ± 13-fold in EHEC. Since extracellular indole represses biofilms (11, 12, 36a, 80), it appears that isatin increases EHEC biofilm formation by dramatically decreasing indole concentrations. It was also found that isatin reduced intracellular indole concentration 2.6-fold ± 0.5-fold, while 7-hydroxyindole had no effect on intracellular indole concentration.
Since the AI-2 transporter genes (lsrABCDFGKR) were highly regulated by the addition of isatin (see Table S1 in the supplemental material), we investigated the impact of purified AI-2 on EHEC biofilm formation. We found that 50 µM AI-2 increased EHEC bottom biofilm formation in LB medium 3.0-fold ± 0.7-fold after 15 h and 10-fold ± 2.5-fold after 24 h; total biofilm was increased 1.6-fold ± 0.2-fold after 24 h. Therefore, AI-2 increases EHEC liquid/solid biofilm formation as it does that of K-12 (20).
Verification of microarray results by RT-PCR.
RT-PCR was used to verify gene expression for lsrA, lsrB, and lsrC for the isatin microarray experiments and for cysP for the 7-hydroxyindole microarray experiment. The results showed comparable changes in expression for the isatin arrays for lsrA (–37-fold in microarrays versus –72-fold with RT-PCR), for lsrB (–64-fold in microarrays versus –110-fold with RT-PCR), and for lsrC (–18-fold in microarrays versus –41-fold with RT-PCR) as well as for cysP for the 7-hydroxyindole arrays (–11.8 in microarrays versus –17.3 with RT-PCR).
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TopABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
In this study, we found that EHEC serotype EDL933 forms robust biofilms under static conditions and a continuous-flow system. Surprisingly, biofilm cells formed on glass wool significantly repressed (3- to 11-fold) 20 pathogenic genes from the LEE island, compared to planktonic cells, which indicates that at 7 h, the virulence genes are not utilized yet. However, it is possible that the biofilm on glass wool lacks cues present for a biofilm on epithelial cells and that these cues may be necessary for induction of the virulence genes. It has been reported that the EPEC espA mutant formed more biofilms than wild-type EPEC (44). In our microarray data, espA was highly repressed (11-fold), along with repression of all the LEE operon genes, in the 7-h biofilm cells (see Table S1 in the supplemental material); however, EHEC biofilm formation in the GI tract may be different due to the presence of many signals from other GI bacteria and the host epithelial cells, unlike in the axenic glass wool culture used here. For example, we have determined that indole produced by E. coli K-12 and other commensal bacteria in the intestine affects EHEC chemotaxis and attachment (unpublished data), so indole is important for pathogenesis with EHEC. In addition, yceK, a predicted lipoprotein-encoding gene, is down-regulated eightfold in 7-h E. coli JM109 biofilms formed on glass wool (51) but was up-regulated eightfold in the EHEC biofilm; hence, this gene may play a different role in pathogenic E. coli or this may be an artifact of only a single time point used here. Also, colanic acid biosynthesis genes (wcaABCDEFGHIJKL and rcsA) are down-regulated in young (7-h) EHEC biofilm cells, as seen previously with asymptomatic bacteriuria E. coli (galEKTU) (23) and with nonpathogenic E. coli (wcaJ) (32). The fimbria-like gene ycbQ is down-regulated in E. coli K-12 BW25113 15-h biofilm cells (11) and was also repressed 14-fold in the EHEC biofilm. Also, agaY, a tagatose biphosphate aldolase gene, was induced fivefold in our data, which agrees well with earlier studies (11). Furthermore, nitrate reductase genes were significantly changed in this study (narIGHK are induced in biofilm cells, and narUZYYW are repressed with isatin), and narVW were induced in biofilm cells of E. coli K-12 PHL628 (32); hence, our data indicate that nitrate metabolism may play a role in the E. coli biofilm formation during the transition from aerobiosis to anaerobiosis (32).
For compounds to be called cell-to-cell signals, they must satisfy four criteria (72): (i) the putative signal must be produced during a specific stage (indole is produced primarily in the stationary phase (71), (ii) the putative signal must accumulate extracellularly and be recognized by a specific receptor (indole is a known extracellular signal [28, 53, 71] that is exported by AcrEF [34] and is imported by Mtr [77]), (iii) the putative signal must accumulate and generate a concerted response (indole has been shown to delay cell division [9]), and (iv) the putative signal must elicit a response that extends beyond the physiological changes required to metabolize or detoxify the signal (indole has been shown to control biofilms [36a] and cell division [9], which are not related to indole metabolism). Therefore, indole is a cell-to-cell signal molecule.
In this study, we demonstrate that hydroxylated indoles may be used to increase or decrease biofilm formation of pathogenic EHEC and that hydroxyindoles and isatin are interspecies biofilm signals. These results are important in that they indicate that the signal indole may undergo interference via oxygenase attack (by cells which do not synthesize it), with the result that the altered molecule influences the same phenotype (biofilm formation) in a different manner due to the presence of an unrelated strain. For example, unoxidized indole inhibits biofilm formation in EHEC while oxidized indole (isatin) stimulates it (Fig. 1). Therefore, this is another example where cells can detect the presence of other bacteria by the way their signals are manipulated (75). Furthermore, since hydroxyindoles are signals, this gives credence to our idea that some bacterial oxygenases may have evolved to regulate the concentrations of the interspecies signal indole by forming hydroxyindoles (36a). For example, wild-type toluene o-monooxygenase of Burkholderia cepacia G4 (56) hydroxylates indole to form primarily 7-hydroxyindole in E. coli (unpublished data), so 7-hydroxyindole is available for signaling. We are currently studying the mechanism by which indole and 7-hydroxyindole affect biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa PAO1 and have found that indole and 7-hydroxyindole (1,000 µM) do not cause toxicity or induce a stress response (unpublished data).
Previously, we found that cysteine biosynthetic genes (cysPUWA) were induced in biofilm cells at 7 and 15 h and in young biofilm cells at 4 h (11) and that a plant extract biofilm inhibitor, ursolic acid, repressed cysDJK (54). Also, deletion of cysE (65) or cysB (54) enhances biofilm formation in E. coli. Here, cysteine biosynthetic genes (cysPD) in biofilm cells were induced compared to those in planktonic cells, while 7-hydroxyindole most significantly repressed cysteine biosynthetic genes (cysPJUIDA) and isatin repressed cysteine desulferase genes (sufABCDSE) that convert cysteine into alanine and sulfane-sulfur (38) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). It appears that isatin and 7-hydroxyindole both work through sulfur metabolism but do so in an opposite manner. Therefore, these results confirm that sulfur metabolism plays an important role in E. coli biofilm formation. It also appears that 7-hydroxyindole and ursolic acid share a common mechanism of biofilm inhibition through sulfur metabolism. Unlike indole, 7-hydroxyindole does not work through SdiA in EHEC (no change of sdiA expression) and does not alter sdiA transcription in K-12, while indole inhibits E. coli K-12 biofilm formation through SdiA (36a).
In our temporal E. coli K-12 biofilm study, we found that motility and flagellar genes were induced in E. coli K-12 biofilm cells at 7 h and in planktonic cells or young biofilm cells at 4 h (11). In the current study, addition of isatin significantly induced 22 flagellar genes (flgABCDEFGHIJK and fliAEFGILMNOPQ) and repressed the AI-2 importers lsrABCDFGKR (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). In an analogous fashion, AI-2 induced the same flagellar genes (flgABCDEFGHIJKLMN and fliACDFHIKLMNOPQ) in E. coli K-12 (52), and addition of AI-2 enhanced E. coli K-12 biofilm (20). Hence, isatin mimics AI-2 for stimulating biofilm formation. AI-2 concentrations were not altered by isatin (data not shown). Therefore, EHEC biofilm stimulation by isatin is not directly caused by AI-2 accumulation but is probably caused by the increased motility as a result of flagellar synthesis (74), the 20-fold reduction in indole concentration as a result of repression of tnaA (11, 12, 36a, 80), the changes in AI-2 transport, and the repression of sulfur metabolism (54, 65).
We determined the common differentially expressed genes between cells exposed to isatin and 7-hydroxyindole and for biofilm versus planktonic cells (Fig. 5). Totals of 347 and 552 genes were differentially expressed in the presence of 7-hydroxyindole and isatin, respectively, and for biofilm versus planktonic cells, the number of genes was 402. Of these, 19 genes were differentially expressed under all three conditions: abgABT, involved in p-aminobenzyl-glutamate utilization (31), agaVWZ, part of the N-acetylgalactosamine PTS system (8), and narIJH, associated with nitrate reductase (13), were all repressed in the presence of isatin and 7-hydroxyindole, whereas they were up-regulated in biofilm cells. Fifty-seven genes were common between isatin and 7-hydroxyindole cells, and the most prominent was the hyaABCDE operon, associated with hydrogenase (42), which was highly repressed in isatin biofilm cells. The hydrogenase genes hyaABDEF, as well as other hydrogenase genes (hybAC and hycABF), were significantly repressed in biofilm cells of E. coli K-12 MG1655 (59). The hydrogenases are probably used to regulate pH by removing the acid formate by converting it to CO2 and H2 (46), and hydrogenase 1 (hya operon) serves only to remove hydrogen (17), so if isatin represses these genes, then perhaps this is a result of internal pH changes induced by isatin. Furthermore, yliH was also repressed 9.8-fold by isatin, and since YliH represses biofilm formation (12), it is consistent that isatin repressed this gene while increasing biofilm formation. oxyS RNA is involved in detoxifying oxidative damage (21); this locus was induced 4.6-fold by isatin, and this indicates that isatin may also cause oxidative stress, as has been seen with K-12 biofilms previously (51). Seventy-seven genes were common between isatin-treated cells and biofilm cells, and 54 genes were common between 7-hydroxyindole-treated cells and biofilm cells.
|
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Tim McDermott for the P. aeruginosa PAO1 strain.
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published ahead of print on 4 May 2007.
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TopABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
cysB/pCA24N-cysB+. Each experiment was repeated two times with six wells each, and 1 standard deviation is shown. The wild type (WT) is BW25113, 