Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2007, p. 4326-4331, Vol. 73, No. 13
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.03008-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Isolation of Key Methanogens for Global Methane Emission from Rice Paddy Fields: a Novel Isolate Affiliated with the Clone Cluster Rice Cluster I
Sanae Sakai,1
Hiroyuki Imachi,1,2*
Yuji Sekiguchi,1,3
Akiyoshi Ohashi,1
Hideki Harada,4 and
Yoichi Kamagata1,3,5
Department of Environmental Systems Engineering, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, Niigata 940-2188, Japan,1
Subground Animalcule Retrieval (SUGAR) Program, Extremobiosphere Research Center, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science & Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokosuka, Kanagawa 237-0061, Japan,2
Institute for Biological Resources and Functions, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Central 6, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8566, Japan,3
Department of Civil Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8579, Japan,4
Research Institute of Genome-Based Biofactory, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Sapporo, Hokkaido 062-8517, Japan5
Received 29 December 2006/
Accepted 1 May 2007

ABSTRACT
Despite the fact that rice paddy fields (RPFs) are contributing
10 to 25% of global methane emissions, the organisms responsible
for methane production in RPFs have remained uncultivated and
thus uncharacterized. Here we report the isolation of a methanogen
(strain SANAE) belonging to an abundant and ubiquitous group
of methanogens called rice cluster I (RC-I) previously identified
as an ecologically important microbial component via culture-independent
analyses. To enrich the RC-I methanogens from rice paddy samples,
we attempted to mimic the in situ conditions of RC-I on the
basis of the idea that methanogens in such ecosystems should
thrive by receiving low concentrations of substrate (H
2) continuously
provided by heterotrophic H
2-producing bacteria. For this purpose,
we developed a coculture method using an indirect substrate
(propionate) in defined medium and a propionate-oxidizing, H
2-producing
syntroph,
Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans, as the H
2 supplier.
By doing so, we significantly enriched the RC-I methanogens
and eventually obtained a methanogen within the RC-I group in
pure culture. This is the first report on the isolation of a
methanogen within RC-I.

INTRODUCTION
Since their discovery in an Italian rice paddy field (RPF) in
1998 (
12), the uncultivated microorganisms in the group RC-I
(rice cluster I) have been a focus of attention with regard
to potential ecological and biogeochemical importance. To date,
the following aspects of RC-I have been elucidated. (i) Cultivation-independent
molecular studies combined with stable isotope analysis strongly
suggested that members of the RC-I group are most active and
play a key role in methane production from RPFs (
22). (ii) The
members are highly likely to be H
2-utilizing methanogens because
abundant populations of RC-I
Archaea were observed in enrichment
cultures with H
2 (
8,
25,
33) and a metagenomic approach showed
that an RC-I methanogen had a full set of genes involved in
methanogenesis from H
2-CO
2 (
9). (iii) The group was found to
be a major archaeal component in natural RPFs regardless of
geographical locations and seasonal changes, accounting for
20 to 50% of total methanogenic populations (
20,
28,
39). (iv)
In addition to the occurrence in RPFs, they have also been observed
in a wide variety of anoxic environments, such as peatland (
1,
33), sediment of freshwater lakes (
40), and contaminated aquifer
(
7,
37), indicating the widespread habitat of RC-I on our planet.
Given the molecular ecological results and biogeochemical data
on paddy fields (
6,
27), the RC-I group has been recognized
as one of the most important yet-to-be isolated, and thus uncharacterized,
methanogens that may significantly impact the global methane
cycle. For these reasons, we set out to isolate a pure culture
of an RC-I group methanogen with the hope that its characterization
might contribute to the understanding of these important methane
sources. Here we report the isolation and initial characterization
of such a microbe.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Environmental samples, microorganisms, and cultivation.
Rice paddy soils were obtained from four places near Nagaoka,
Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Methanogenic sludge was collected
from a methanogenic municipal sewage treatment plant at Nagaoka,
Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Strain SANAE was isolated in this
study as a novel hydrogenotrophic methanogenic archaeon.
Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans strain MPOB (DSM 10017) was purchased from the
Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH
(Braunschweig, Germany). All cultivations were carried out at
37°C with 50-ml serum vials containing 20 ml of an artificial
medium (
31) under an atmosphere of N
2-CO
2 (80/20 [vol/vol])
without shaking. The purity of strain SANAE was checked by 16S
rRNA gene-based clone analysis with the universal archaeal primer
pair Ar109f-1490R (
16,
38), terminal restriction fragment length
polymorphism based on a method reported by Chin et al. (
2),
FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) with 16S rRNA-targeted
oligonucleotide probes for the isolates (see the FISH section
below), evaluation by a failure to recover bacterial 16S rRNA
gene amplification by PCR with the universal bacterial primer
pair EUB338*-1490R (
14,
38), and cultivation with the following
media at 37 and 55°C: (i) thioglycolate medium (Difco) containing
ca. 150 kPa H
2-CO
2 (in the headspace) and 10 mM sulfate; (ii)
thioglycolate medium containing 20 mM lactate and 10 mM sulfate;
(iii) thioglycolate medium containing 10 mM sucrose, 10 mM glucose,
10 mM cellobiose, and 10 mM xylose; and (iv) AC medium (Difco).
Analysis of 16S rRNA genes.
DNA extraction from environmental samples and enrichment cultures and PCR amplification were performed as described previously (16). PCR amplification was done with the archaeal universal primer pair Ar109f-1490R (16, 38). PCR products were purified with a MinElute purification kit (QIAGEN). Clone libraries were constructed with the TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen). The nearly full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences of isolated strains were amplified with the archaeal primer pair Arch21F-1490R (5, 38). Sequences were determined with a CEQ DTC kit-quick start kit (Beckman Coulter) and a CEQ2000XL (Beckman Coulter) automated DNA sequencer. Phylogenetic analyses were performed with the ARB program (24). The base phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method implemented in the ARB program with nearly full-length (>1,000 nucleotides) sequences. Partial-length sequences (<1,000 nucleotides) were inserted into the base tree with the parsimony insertion tool of the ARB program to show their approximate positions. Bootstrap resampling analysis (11) for 1,000 replicates was performed with the PAUP* 4.0 package (36) to estimate the confidence of tree topologies.
FISH.
Fixation of cells and whole-cell in situ hybridization were performed as described previously (32). The 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probe SANAE1136 (5'-GTGTACTCGCCCTCCTCG-3') for strain SANAE was designed with the PROBE DESIGN tool of the ARB program (24). The probe was labeled with Cy3. The stringency of hybridization was adjusted by adding formamide to the hybridization buffer (25% [vol/vol] for SANAE1136).
Microscopy and chemical analyses.
An Olympus fluorescence microscope was used for studies of cell morphology and epifluorescence (Olympus BX50F). Short-chain fatty acids, methane, H2, and carbon dioxide were measured as described previously (15-17).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
Sequence data obtained in this study were deposited in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank databases under accession numbers AB162774, AB196288, AB236108, and AB243792 to AB243811.

RESULTS
Attempt to cultivate RC-I methanogens with hydrogen (H2).
First, to choose the appropriate inoculum to cultivate RC-I
methanogens, we began with a survey of four RPF soils via 16S
rRNA gene-based clone analysis with archaeon-specific PCR primers.
Fifty clones were randomly picked from each clone library. While
molecular signals of the RC-I group methanogens have been detected
from all RPF samples, we selected a sample from Nagaoka, Niigata
Prefecture, Japan, which had the highest clonal frequency of
RC-I phylotypes (Fig.
1, phylotypes NRP-O [3/50 clones] and
NRP-U [1/50 clones]). On the basis of the assumption that RC-I
probably is a group of hydrogenotrophic methanogens, as indicated
by previous studies, the first enrichment trial involved anaerobic
incubation of the soil sample with H
2 (ca. 150 kPa) as an energy
source in both liquid and solid media at 37°C. Many methanogens
grew in the enrichment cultures after 3 days of incubation,
as judged by the methane production with cell growth and F
420 autofluorescence (data not shown). However, further analysis
of these cells via 16S rRNA gene-based cloning analysis showed
that not all of the archaeal clones belonged to the RC-I group
but some were closely related to previously isolated methanogens
such as
Methanobacterium bryantii (sequence similarity, 98%;
sequence accession no. AB236108).
Cultivation of an RC-I methanogen by the coculture method.
Our first attempt, described above, was based on a canonical
method for cultivation, resulting in the isolation of a nontargeted
H
2-utilizing methanogen. One of the conceivable reasons was
the difference between in vitro and in situ physicochemical
conditions. In particular, we assumed that a high concentration
of H
2 in the headspace (for example, 100 kPa) might be fatal
because it was approximately 1,000- to 10,000-fold higher than
the in situ H
2 concentrations of natural RPFs (
4,
10). Most
likely, this cultivation condition was not suitable for RC-I
members to compete with the growth of previously isolated methanogens.
In fact, it is well known that high concentrations of substrates
sometimes allow minor in situ but fast-growing in vitro microbes
to grow.
If the in vitro condition is similar to the in situ RC-I habitat, would it be possible to cultivate the targeted microbes in the artificial culture medium? Indeed, some of previously uncultured microbes have been isolated in pure cultures only when the substrate was provided at low concentrations close to the natural environment (3, 19, 29). The underlying idea was that RC-I methanogens in RPFs might thrive by receiving low concentrations of substrate (H2) continuously provided by heterotrophic H2-producing bacteria (this way of living is commonly referred to as interspecies H2 transfer) (18, 30). We thus established a coculture method by using the syntrophic propionate-oxidizing H2-producing bacterium Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans (13) as the supplier of H2. Bacteria like S. fumaroxidans are called syntrophs and are fermentative bacteria that catalyze the oxidation of a variety of substrates (fatty acids, alcohols, and aromatic compounds) via reactions that are thermodynamically unfavorable unless H2 is continuously removed (18, 30). Thus, they typically live in syntrophy with H2-consuming microbes such as methanogens. Therefore, if cultivation is done together with a particular syntroph growing on a substrate that the syntroph can preferably metabolize, it can continuously provide low concentrations of H2 to methanogens (ca. 10 to 30 Pa in the case of propionate) (17, 21, 34, 35). Thus, for the next challenge, we cultured the soil samples with an anaerobic propionate-oxidizing syntroph, S. fumaroxidans, as the H2 supplier. Since the doubling growth time of S. fumaroxidans is ca. 5 days (13), as a result, hydrogen, an end product of its metabolism, will be provided to methanogens at a slow rate.
A primary enrichment culture was made from the rice paddy soil with propionate (20 mM) as the sole energy source and the pregrown cells of an S. fumaroxidans culture. After 3 months of incubation of the coculture enrichment with S. fumaroxidans, cell growth, propionate degradation, and methane production were observed (Fig. 2A). The culture was successively transferred to fresh medium every 50 to 80 days (5 to 10% [vol/vol] inoculum). During cultivation, the partial pressure of H2 in the cultures was kept at less than 30 Pa (Fig. 2A). Microscopic observation after five transfers showed that the community consisted simply of F420-autofluorescent methanogen-like cells and Syntrophobacter-like, oval, rod-shaped cells. To identify the methanogens thriving in the syntrophic culture, we constructed an rRNA gene clone library with an archaeal universal primer set. The clone analysis indicated that all 10 of the archaeal sequences examined were affiliated with a single phylotype within the RC-I group (Fig. 1, phylotype NRP-ProM-A). To confirm whether the clonal sequence obtained from the dominant archaeal population in the culture, a specific DNA probe (SANAE1136) was designed and applied to the culture. As a result, the syntrophic culture actually contained SANAE1136 probe-positive rods (Fig. 2D and E). These observations indicated that the microbe possessing the rRNA gene detected as phylotype NRP-ProM-A was the dominant archaeal population in the culture.
Isolation of the RC-I methanogen in pure culture.
To obtain the RC-I methanogen in pure culture from the coculture
enrichment, we used the serial-dilution method with both liquid
and solid media and different substrates that are generally
utilized by H
2-utilizing methanogens, such as H
2 (ca. 150 kPa)
and formate (40 mM), with the propionate coculture system as
the inoculum. In the H
2 cultures, we observed the growth of
the RC-I methanogen that converted H
2 to methane stoichiometrically,
which is explained by an equation 4H
2 + CO
2 
CH
4 + 2H
2O (Fig.
3). The growth rate, however, was found to be very slow compared
with those of previously characterized methanogens; i.e., the
doubling time of RC-I cells with H
2 was 4.2 days (based on the
optical density at 600 nm), indicating that isolation requires
a long time. After using the serial-dilution methods for over
a year, we eventually succeeded in isolating the RC-I methanogen
in a pure culture, designated strain SANAE (Fig.
4), by the
deep-agar method with H
2 as the substrate.
Strain SANAE had nonmotile, rod-shaped cells. They were 1.8
to 2.4 µm long and 0.3 to 0.6 µm wide. The strain
formed brownish, lens-shaped colonies 1 to 1.5 mm in diameter
in deep agar with H
2 (ca. 150 kPa in the headspace). In addition
to H
2, the isolate can also grow with formate (40 mM). Acetate
was not utilized as an energy source.

DISCUSSION
We have developed a new way to isolate methanogens, by using
syntrophs that can supply H
2 at very low concentrations (coculture
method). As expected, the RC-I methanogen could be cultivated
by the coculture method whereas conventional enrichments from
the same environmental samples with high levels of H
2 yielded
fast-growing methanogens such as
Methanobacterium spp. Assuming
that strain SANAE is representative of the members of the RC-I
group, our results suggest that the RC-I group has a higher
affinity for H
2 than other, fast-growing, members and thus may
be well adapted to the low-H
2 habitat of RPFs. This speculation
was also suggested by two reports on stable-isotope-probing
analysis (
23,
26). Lu et al. reported that
Methanobacteriales and
Methanosarcinales incorporated
13C when rice root was incubated
in a high-H
2 atmosphere in the presence of
13CO
2, while
13C
was preferentially incorporated into RC-I under an N
2 atmosphere
in which a low concentration of H
2 was produced by fermentative
bacteria from rice root materials (
23). According to the stable-isotope-probing
analysis with
13C-labeled propionate for RPF soil reported by
Lueders et al.,
13C was incorporated not only into rRNA of syntrophic
propionate-oxidizing bacteria but also into certain methanogenic
archaeal groups, including RC-I (
26). These results imply that
RC-I methanogens probably live syntrophically with propionate-oxidizing
bacteria in RPF environments. Consequently, given that the members
of RC-I may have a high affinity for H
2 and live in syntrophy
with fermentative bacteria such as syntrophic propionate oxidizers,
it can be said that our coculture method is a suitable way to
cultivate RC-I methanogens.
Very recently, a complete metagenomic sequence of an RC-I member was reported (9). The sequence was retrieved from a paddy sample incubated at 50°C, indicating that the organism is most likely a thermophilic methanogen. Since the temperature of natural RPFs is normally not stable, it is reasonable that a variety of sequences within the RC-I cluster, which may represent either mesophilic or thermophilic members, have been detected from RPFs. That metagenomic study revealed that the thermophile has a unique set of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes such as catalase and superoxide dismutase. Considering that RPFs receive a seasonal change in redox potential (oxic to anoxic), these unique genes may be indispensable for survival in such an environment.
The 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity between the metagenome and strain SANAE is, however, only 92.0% (Fig. 1, RC-I fosmid 1B6mer2), indicating that the two organisms are phylogenetically distinct at the genus level. Therefore, further studies cross-linking both the metagenomic information of thermophilic RC-I and our mesophilic isolate SANAE are needed to better understand how RC-I methanogens contribute to global methane emission from RPF environments. There are several important questions that have to be addressed to fully understand the role of RC-I methanogens. (i) Can thermophilic RC-I methanogens also grow slowly with a low concentration of H2? (ii) What is the biochemical or physiological background of the low maximum specific growth rate and the assumed high affinity for hydrogen of RC-I and similar organisms? (iii) What is the difference in enzymatic characteristics, in particular, antioxidant enzymes, between the two different RC-I methanogens? To address these questions, we are now performing further biochemical (including examination of affinity for H2 in terms of Km) and genomic analyses of our isolate. We are also trying to isolate the thermophilic RC-I methanogen whose genomic sequence is complete.
Since the coculture method can mimic the natural ecosystem, where H2 is provided at low concentrations, the method was supposed to have potential for the cultivation of uncharacterized methanogens residing in other ecosystems. To prove this, we also applied the cultivation technique to a methanogenic digester that contains a relatively large amount of uncultured archaeal members within the order Methanomicrobiales. By strategy described above, we successfully isolated a new methanogen, designated strain NOBI-1 (16S rRNA gene sequence accession no. AB162774), which was one of the predominant methanogens in the original ecosystem but was not cultivated so far at the genus or family level. In this case, all of the primary enrichment cultures using a high partial pressure of H2 with the same inoculum resulted in the cultivation of well-known methanogens like those of the genus Methanobacterium. Detailed information about the enrichment, isolation, and physiological properties of the isolate will be reported in the near future. These findings strongly indicate that the coculture method should work for isolation of fastidious but ecologically important methanogens that would otherwise escape conventional isolation strategies.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Fumio Inagaki at JAMSTEC and Kenneth H. Nealson at
the University of Southern California for critical reading of
the manuscript.
This study was financially supported by grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization, and the Institute for Fermentation, Osaka. S.S. was supported by the Research Fellowship of the JSPS for Young Scientists (04663).

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Subground Animalcule Retrieval (SUGAR) Program, Extremobiosphere Research Center, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science & Technology (JAMSTEC), 2-15 Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 237-0061, Japan. Phone: 81-46-867-9709. Fax: 81-46-867-9715. E-mail:
imachi{at}jamstec.go.jp 
Published ahead of print on 4 May 2007. 

REFERENCES
1 - Basiliko, N., J. B. Yavitt, P. M. Dees, and S. M. Merkel. 2003. Methane biogeochemistry and methanogen communities in two northern peatland ecosystems, New York State. Geomicrobiol. J. 20:563-577.[CrossRef]
2 - Chin, K.-J., T. Lukow, S. Stubner, and R. Conrad. 1999. Structure and function of the methanogenic archaeal community in stable cellulose-degrading enrichment cultures at two different temperature (15 and 30°C). FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 30:313-326.[Medline]
3 - Connon, S. A., and S. J. Giovannoni. 2002. High-throughput methods for culturing microorganisms in very-low-nutrient media yield diverse new marine isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:3878-3885.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Conrad, R., H. Schütz, and M. Babbel. 1987. Temperature limitation of hydrogen turnover and methanogenesis in anoxic paddy soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 45:281-289.[CrossRef]
5 - DeLong, E. F. 1992. Archaea in coastal marine environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:5685-5689.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Dentener, F., R. Derwent, E. Dlugokencky, E. Holland, I. Isaksen, J. Katima, V. Kirchhoff, P. Matson, P. Midgley, and M. Wang. 2001. Climate change 2001, the scientific basis. Third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
7 - Dojka, M. A., P. Hugenholtz, S. K. Haack, and N. R. Pace. 1998. Microbial diversity in a hydrocarbon- and chlorinated-solvent-contaminated aquifer undergoing intrinsic bioremediation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:3869-3877.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Erkel, C., D. Kemnitz, M. Kube, P. Ricke, K.-J. Chin, S. Dedysh, R. Reinhardt, R. Conrad, and W. Liesack. 2005. Retrieval of first genome data for rice cluster I methanogens by a combination of cultivation and molecular techniques. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 53:187-204.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 - Erkel, C., M. Kube, R. Reinhardt, and W. Liesack. 2006. Genome of Rice Cluster I Archaeathe key methane producers in the rice rhizosphere. Science 313:370-372.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Fey, A., and R. Conrad. 2000. Effect of temperature on carbon and electron flow and on the archaeal community in methanogenic rice field soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:4790-4797.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Ficker, M., K. Krastel, S. Orlicky, and E. Edwards. 1999. Molecular characterization of a toluene-degrading methanogenic consortium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:5576-5585.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Großkopf, R., S. Stubner, and W. Liesack. 1998. Novel euryarchaeotal lineages detected on rice roots and in the anoxic bulk soil of flooded rice microcosms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:4983-4989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Harmsen, H. J. M., B. L. M. Van Kuijk, C. M. Plugge, A. D. L. Akkermans, W. M. De Vos, and A. J. M. Stams. 1998. Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans sp. nov., a syntrophic propionate-degrading sulfate-reducing bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 48:1383-1387.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Hatamoto, M., H. Imachi, A. Ohashi, and H. Harada. 2007. Identification and cultivation of anaerobic, syntrophic long-chain fatty acid degrading microbes from mesophilic and thermophilic methanogenic sludges. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:1332-1340.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Imachi, H., Y. Sekiguchi, Y. Kamagata, S. Hanada, A. Ohashi, and H. Harada. 2002. Pelotomaculum thermopropionicum gen. nov. sp. nov., an anaerobic, thermophilic, syntrophic propionate-oxidizing bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52:1729-1735.[Abstract]
16 - Imachi, H., Y. Sekiguchi, Y. Kamagata, A. Loy, Y.-L. Qiu, P. Hugenholtz, N. Kimura, M. Wagner, A. Ohashi, and H. Harada. 2006. Non-sulfate-reducing, syntrophic bacteria affiliated with Desulfotomaculum cluster I are widely distributed in methanogenic environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:2080-2091.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Imachi, H., Y. Sekiguchi, Y. Kamagata, A. Ohashi, and H. Harada. 2000. Cultivation and in situ detection of a thermophilic bacterium capable of oxidizing propionate in syntrophic association with hydrogenotrophic methanogens in a thermophilic methanogenic granular sludge. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:3608-3615.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18 - Jackson, B. E., and M. J. McInerney. 2002. Anaerobic microbial metabolism can proceed close to thermodynamic limits. Nature 415:454-456.[CrossRef][Medline]
19 - Kaeberlein, T., K. Lewis, and S. S. Epstein. 2002. Isolating "uncultivable" microorganisms in pure culture in a simulated natural environment. Science 296:1127-1129.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20 - Krüger, M., P. Frenzel, D. Kemnitz, and R. Conrad. 2005. Activity, structure and dynamics of the methanogenic archaeal community in a flooded Italian rice field. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 51:323-331.[CrossRef][Medline]
21 - Krylova, N., P. H. Janssen, and R. Conrad. 1997. Turnover of propionate in methanogenic paddy soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 23:107-117.[CrossRef]
22 - Lu, Y., and R. Conrad. 2005. In situ stable isotope probing of methanogenic Archaea in the rice rhizosphere. Science 309:1088-1090.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23 - Lu, Y.-H., T. Lueders, M. W. Friedrich, and R. Conrad. 2005. Detecting active methanogenic populations on rice roots using stable isotope probing. Environ. Microbiol. 7:326-336.[CrossRef][Medline]
24 - Ludwig, W., O. Strunk, R. Westram, L. Richter, H. Meier, Yadhukumar, A. Buchner, T. Lai, S. Steppi, G. Jobb, W. Förster, I. Brettske, S. Gerber, A. W. Ginhart, O. Gross, S. Grumann, S. Hermann, R. Jost, A. König, T. Liss, R. Lüßmann, M. May, B. Nonhoff, B. Reichel, R. Strehlow, A. Stamatakis, N. Stuckmann, A. Vilbig, M. Lenke, T. Ludwig, A. Bode, and K.-H. Schleifer. 2004. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1363-1371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25 - Lueders, T., K.-J. Chin, R. Conrad, and M. W. Friedrich. 2001. Molecular analyses of methyl-coenzyme M reductase
-subunit (mcrA) genes in rice field soil and enrichment cultures reveal the methanogenic phenotype of a novel archaeal lineage. Environ. Microbiol. 3:194-204.[CrossRef][Medline] 26 - Lueders, T., B. Pommerenke, and M. W. Friedrich. 2004. Stable-isotope probing of microorganisms thriving at thermodynamic limits: syntrophic propionate oxidation in flooded soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:5778-5786.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27 - Neue, H.-U. 1993. Methane emission from rice fields. BioScience 43:466-473.[CrossRef]
28 - Ramakrishnan, B., T. Lueders, P. F. Dunfield, R. Conrad, and M. W. Friedrich. 2001. Archaeal community structures in rice soils from different geographical regions before and after initiation of methane production. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 37:175-186.[CrossRef]
29 - Rappé, M. S., S. A. Connon, K. L. Vergin, and S. J. Giovannoni. 2002. Cultivation of the ubiquitous SAR11 marine bacterioplankton clade. Nature 418:630-633.[CrossRef][Medline]
30 - Schink, B. 1997. Energetics of syntrophic cooperation in methanogenic degradation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 61:262-280.[Abstract]
31 - Sekiguchi, Y., Y. Kamagata, K. Nakamura, A. Ohashi, and H. Harada. 2000. Syntrophothermus lipocalidus gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel thermophilic, syntrophic, fatty-acid-oxidizing anaerobe which utilizes isobutyrate. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50:771-779.[Abstract]
32 - Sekiguchi, Y., Y. Kamagata, K. Syutubo, A. Ohashi, H. Harada, and K. Nakamura. 1998. Phylogenetic diversity of mesophilic and thermophilic granular sludges determined by 16S rRNA gene analysis. Microbiology 144:2655-2665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33 - Sizova, M. V., N. S. Panikov, T. P. Tourova, and P. W. Flanagan. 2003. Isolation and characterization of oligotrophic acido-tolerant methanogenic consortia from a Sphagnum peat bog. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 45:301-315.[CrossRef]
34 - Stams, A. J. M. 1994. Metabolic interactions between anaerobic bacteria in methanogenic environments. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 66:271-294.[CrossRef][Medline]
35 - Stams, A. J. M., K. C. F. Grolle, C. T. M. J. Frijters, and J. B. van Lier. 1992. Enrichment of thermophilic propionate-oxidizing bacteria in syntrophy with Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum or Methanobacterium thermoformicicum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:346-352.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36 - Swofford, D. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
37 - Watanabe, K., Y. Kodama, and N. Kaku. 2002. Diversity and abundance of bacteria in an underground oil-storage cavity. BMC Microbiol. 2:23-32.[CrossRef][Medline]
38 - Weisburg, W. G., S. M. Barns, D. A. Pelletier, and D. J. Lane. 1991. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J. Bacteriol. 173:697-703.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39 - Wu, X.-L., M. W. Friedrich, and R. Conrad. 2006. Diversity and ubiquity of thermophilic methanogenic archaea in temperate anoxic soils. Environ. Microbiol. 8:394-404.[CrossRef][Medline]
40 - Zepp Falz, K., C. Holliger, R. Großkopf, W. Liesack, A. N. Nozhevnikova, B. Müller, B. Wehrli, and D. Hahn. 1999. Vertical distribution of methanogens in the anoxic sediment of Rotsee (Switzerland). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:2402-2408.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2007, p. 4326-4331, Vol. 73, No. 13
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.03008-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Sakai, S., Imachi, H., Sekiguchi, Y., Tseng, I-C., Ohashi, A., Harada, H., Kamagata, Y.
(2009). Cultivation of Methanogens under Low-Hydrogen Conditions by Using the Coculture Method. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
75: 4892-4896
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cadillo-Quiroz, H., Yavitt, J. B., Zinder, S. H.
(2009). Methanosphaerula palustris gen. nov., sp. nov., a hydrogenotrophic methanogen isolated from a minerotrophic fen peatland. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.
59: 928-935
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Robertson, C. E., Spear, J. R., Harris, J. K., Pace, N. R.
(2009). Diversity and Stratification of Archaea in a Hypersaline Microbial Mat. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
75: 1801-1810
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Peng, J., Lu, Z., Rui, J., Lu, Y.
(2008). Dynamics of the Methanogenic Archaeal Community during Plant Residue Decomposition in an Anoxic Rice Field Soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 2894-2901
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sakai, S., Imachi, H., Hanada, S., Ohashi, A., Harada, H., Kamagata, Y.
(2008). Methanocella paludicola gen. nov., sp. nov., a methane-producing archaeon, the first isolate of the lineage 'Rice Cluster I', and proposal of the new archaeal order Methanocellales ord. nov.. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.
58: 929-936
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cadillo-Quiroz, H., Yashiro, E., Yavitt, J. B., Zinder, S. H.
(2008). Characterization of the Archaeal Community in a Minerotrophic Fen and Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism-Directed Isolation of a Novel Hydrogenotrophic Methanogen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 2059-2068
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Imachi, H., Sakai, S., Sekiguchi, Y., Hanada, S., Kamagata, Y., Ohashi, A., Harada, H.
(2008). Methanolinea tarda gen. nov., sp. nov., a methane-producing archaeon isolated from a methanogenic digester sludge. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.
58: 294-301
[Abstract]
[Full Text]