Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 2007, p. 5574-5579, Vol. 73, No. 17
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.00342-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117811 Moscow, Russia,1 Environmental Biotechnology, Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands,2 Biocatalysis and Organic Chemistry, Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands3
Received 12 February 2007/ Accepted 26 June 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
N (nitrile) bond. They are mostly industrially produced, as intermediates and building blocks in organic synthesis and as organic solvents, but there are also a few examples of naturally occurring nitriles, formed by cyanogenic plants from cyanide (23). In addition, simple aliphatic nitriles, such as isobutyronitrile (iBN), can be produced during the anaerobic degradation of amino acids (7). Most of the nitriles are hydrophobic, toxic compounds that are difficult to degrade. Therefore, the environmental role of the enzymatic conversion of nitriles is very important. Basically, two different enzymatic mechanisms resulting in the conversion of nitriles to their corresponding carboxylic acids are known. The metalloenzyme nitrile hydratase hydrolyzes a wide range of aliphatic, arylaliphatic, and aromatic nitriles to their corresponding amides (R-CONH2), which can be further converted into carboxylic acids and ammonium by amidases. The organisms producing nitrile hydratases usually also produce amidases (10). In the case of an organism with a weak amidase activity, an association with an amide-specializing partner can be very efficient in complete nitrile biodegradation (12). Another enzyme family of nitrilases performs a single-step hydrolysis of nitriles, mostly aromatic, into acids and ammonium, although weak production of amides as by-products was reported in some cases (9, 11, 17). The microorganisms possessing these enzymes are valuable biocatalysts and can be used either in (enantioselective) organic synthesis or in environmental biotechnology (1, 2, 6, 12, 14). This stimulated the search for active producers of nitrile-hydrolyzing enzymes (13), as well as the screening of environmental DNA and whole-genome sequences for the genes encoding new nitrile-degrading enzymes (23). Currently, many strains, mostly bacterial, but also several fungal, are known as active producers of nitrile-hydrolyzing enzymes. The best-studied group among them, producing extremely active nitrile hydratases and nitrilases, belongs to the genus Rhodococcus in the actinobacteria (3, 10). So far, all known nitrile-degrading microorganisms are neutrophilic, i.e., they grow optimally at neutral pH values.
Soda lakes and soda solonchak soils are naturally occurring saline habitats with a constant high pH of around 10 due to the high alkaline-buffering capacity of dissolved sodium carbonates. These habitats harbor mostly haloalkaliphilic prokaryotic microbial communities (8, 20, 25). Recently, we have described the first example of a bacterium, Natronocella acetinitrilica, isolated from soda lake sediments, capable of growth with aceto- and propionitrile as carbon, energy, and nitrogen sources under haloalkaline conditions (21). Enzymatic nitrile hydrolysis at highly alkaline conditions might have certain advantages, particularly when cyanide is involved in the reaction process. For example, the well-known Strecker reaction could be coupled with enzymatic
-aminonitrile hydrolysis to (enantioselectively) produce
-aminoamides and
-amino acids (5).
In this paper, the possibility of the degradation of more-complex nitrile molecules by haloalkaliphilic bacteria from soda habitats is described. The results demonstrated that iBN can be efficiently utilized as a carbon, energy, and nitrogen source at a high pH by the concerted action of at least two different bacterial species producing nitrile hydratase and amidase (Fig. 1).
|
View larger version (3K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Scheme of iBN hydrolysis by a nitrile hydratase (NHase)/amidase system through iBA to iB.
|
|
|
|---|
Media compositions and growth conditions.
A mineral medium based on sodium carbonate buffer at pH 10 and 0.6 M total Na+, containing 22 g liter–1 Na2CO3, 8 g liter–1 NaHCO3, 6 g liter–1 NaCl, 0.5 g liter–1 K2HPO4, was used for the enrichment and pure culture experiments. The pH of this medium was stable even after prolonged incubation. After being sterilized, the medium was supplemented with 1 ml liter–1 trace metal solution (16), 1 mM MgSO4, and 0.1 mg liter–1 of filter-sterilized vitamin B12. Enrichment was performed in 100-ml serum bottles closed with rubber septa (to prevent substrate loss) containing 20 ml medium and 1 ml sediment or 1 g soil. In the case of nitriles and their corresponding amides, these compounds were used as both C and N sources, while in the case of carboxylic acids, the medium was supplemented with 4 mM NH4Cl. iBN to a final concentration of 2 to 10 mM was added directly to each culture vessel before the vessel was closed. In the case of the solid medium (the solidifying agent was Noble agar; Difco), iBN was added after the medium was cooled down to 50°C, to prevent excessive loss of substrate. Liquid cultures were incubated on a rotary shaker at 100 rpm and 28°C and were periodically checked for ammonia production. When the ammonia concentration reached 2 mM, the culture was transferred into a new medium at a 1:100 dilution. After 3 to 4 successful 1:100 transfers, the culture was serially diluted up to 10–11. The culture from a maximal positive dilution was plated onto solid medium, either by surface spreading or by the agar-shake technique. The plates were incubated in closed jars for 30 days. Separate colonies were placed into 5 ml liquid medium with iBN or isobutyroamide (iBA) in 30-ml serum bottles closed with rubber septa. Positive cultures were plated again to check for purity.
Growth experiments with pure cultures were performed in 250-ml closed serum bottles with 50 ml liquid on a rotary shaker at 100 to 150 rpm and 30°C. Substrates were used at a 5 to 20 mM concentration. The growth was monitored by assessing the optical density, and the degradation of nitriles was followed by assessing the level of ammonium production, the disappearance of the substrate, and the formation of intermediates. The pH profiling of the growth of the cultures was done in the medium containing 0.6 M total Na+ either as NaCl (pH 6.5 to 8.0) or NaHCO3/Na2CO3 (pH 8.5 to 11.0) (19). The salt dependence for the growth of the cultures was investigated in a range of sodium carbonate-based media containing 0.1 to 3.0 M total Na+ at pH 10.
Experiments with washed cells and cell extracts.
To determine the substrate profiles and activities of the pure cultures and the influence of pH and salt concentration on the activities, cells grown at pH 10 and 0.6 M Na+ with various substrates were harvested, washed, and resuspended in 0.5 M sodium carbonate buffer, pH 9, at a cell density of 20 to 25 mg ml–1 protein. To obtain a cell extract, the same cell suspension was sonicated, followed by the removal of unbroken cells by centrifugation. Two types of activity tests were performed. To determine the level of one of the final hydrolysis products, ammonia, the washed cells and cell extract were incubated in 2-ml Eppendorf tubes with 1 ml of reaction mixture at 30°C. The tubes were shaken horizontally at 200 rpm. The formation of ammonium was checked regularly in 50-µl samples after rapid centrifugation.
Activity measurements to determine the levels of nitrile consumption and amide and acid production were performed in 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes on a ThermoTWISTER comfort (QUANTIFOIL Instruments). To 1.5 ml buffer (0.5 M NaHCO3/0.1 M NaCl, pH 8 to 8.5) 0.5 to 20 µl of pure nitrile was added directly from the source liquid and the reaction mixture was shaken horizontally (700 rpm) at 21°C. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 5, 10, or 20 µl of cell suspension with a known protein concentration (20 to 25 mg ml–1 protein). Regular samples were taken and quenched in 1 M HCl solution. After centrifugation of the denatured protein, the supernatant was either injected directly into a high-pressure liquid chromatography column or diluted first with MilliQ water when necessary.
Analytical procedures.
The protein concentration was measured by the Lowry method. The ammonium concentration was determined by the phenol-hypochlorite method according to Weatherburn (24). Nitriles, amides, and carboxylic acids were detected by high-pressure liquid chromatography. All compounds were detected by using a Merck Chromolith SpeedROD RP-18e column (50 x 4.6 mm), except for acetonitrile, acetamide, and acetic acid. Acrylonitrile, methacrylonitrile, butyronitrile, iBN, valeronitrile, nicotinonitrile, and their corresponding amides and acids were separated by using an eluent of MilliQ water (98.9%), acetonitrile (1%), and acetic acid (0.1%). Benzonitrile, phenylacetonitrile, capronitrile, and their corresponding amides and acids were separated by using an eluent of MilliQ water (89.9%), acetonitrile (10%), and acetic acid (0.1%). Propionitrile and its corresponding amide and acid were separated by using an eluent of MilliQ (99.9%) and acetic acid (0.1%). All separations on the SpeedROD were carried out at 21°C and with a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Acetonitrile, acetamide, and acetic acid were detected by using a Phenomenex Rezex ROA-organic acid H+ column (300 x 7.80 mm; 8 microns) with an eluent consisting of MilliQ water with 0.01 M trifluoroacetic acid (0.6 ml/min) and a column temperature of 60°C. The aliphatic nitriles were detected by using a Shimadzu RID 10A refractive index detector. All other compounds were detected by using a Shimadzu SPD-10A VP UV-VIS detector. A wavelength of 210 nm was used to detect all aliphatic amides and acids, and a wavelength of 230 nm was used to detect all aromatic amides and acids.
Phase-contrast microphotographs were obtained by using a Zeiss Axioplan Imaging 2 microscope (Göttingen, Germany). For electron microscopy, cells were fixed with glutaraldehyde (final concentration 3%, vol/vol) and stained with 1% (wt/vol) uranyl acetate for positive contrast. For thin sectioning, the cells were fixed in 1% (wt/vol) OsO4 and 0.5 M NaCl for 3 h at room temperature, washed, stained overnight with 1% (wt/vol) uranyl acetate, dehydrated in an ethanol series, and embedded in Epon resin. The thin sections were stained with 1% (wt/vol) lead citrate. The isolation of the DNA and subsequent determination of the G+C content and the DNA-DNA hybridization were performed by using the thermal denaturation/reassociation technique (4, 15).
Genomic DNA for phylogenetic analysis was extracted from the cells by using an UltraClean soil DNA extraction kit (MolBio Laboratories, United States) following the manufacturer's instructions. The 16S rRNA genes were amplified using general bacterial primers. The PCR products were purified from low-melting agarose by using a Wizard PCR Prep kit (Promega, United States) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Sequencing was performed by using a BigDye Terminator v.3.1 sequencing reaction kit on an ABI 3730 DNA automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Inc., United States). The sequences were first compared with those stored in GenBank by using the BLAST algorithm. The sequences were aligned with those from GenBank by using ClustalW. Phylogenetic trees were constructed with four different algorithms using the TREECONW software package (22).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequences of the strains ANL-iso2, ANL-iso4, ANL-isoa, and ANL-isoa2 are EF422408, EF422411, EF422409, and EF422410, respectively.
|
|
|---|
The actinobacterium ANL-iso2 grew with propionitrile (C3), butyronitrile (C4), valeronitrile (C5), and capronitrile (C6), in addition to iBN, as carbon, energy, and nitrogen sources (Table 1), with two phases of growth clearly distinguished. The first, rapid phase of nitrile hydrolysis to the corresponding amide, with little biomass growth, was followed by the second, much longer phase of biomass growth with amide/acid utilization (Fig. 2a). Clearly, the utilization of hydrolysis products was the bottleneck for complete nitrile metabolism in this bacterium. Its partner, Marinospirillum ANL-isoa, was unable to utilize nitriles, but grew at least 3 to 6 times faster than the nitrile-degrading organism on the products of nitrile hydrolysis and other simple compounds (Table 1).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Comparison of the growth kinetics of members of the haloalkaliphilic iBN-utilizing cocultures
|
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Growth and product formation with iBN as carbon, energy, and nitrogen source in batch cultures of actinobacterium strain ANL-iso2 (a) and Bacillus strain ANL-iso4 (b) at pH 10, 0.6 M Na+. Symbols: closed circles, iBN; open circles, iBA; open triangles, NH3; stars, iB; closed diamonds, biomass. The means of the results from two experiments with deviations of <10% are shown.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Influence of vitamin supplementation and a microbial partner on the efficiency of the growth of nitrile-degrading soil Bacillus strain ANL-iso4 at pH 10a
|
Influence of pH and salt on growth and iBN degradation activity.
According to the results of pH/salt profiling, all four isolates belonged to moderately salt-tolerant alkaliphiles. The pH ranges for growth at 0.6 M Na+ with iBN were 8.4 to 10.4 (optimum, pH 9.0 to 9.5) for ANL-iso2 and 7.0 to 10.25 (optimum, pH 9.0 to 9.35) for ANL-iso4; with iBA as the substrate, the pH ranges were 8.0 to 10.5 (optimum, pH 9.5) for ANL-isoa and 7.3 to 10.3 (optimum, pH 9.0) for ANL-isoa2. The salt range for growth (M Na+) at pH 10 was 0.1 to 2 M (optimum, 0.3 to 0.5 M) for all four isolates.
The influence of pH on the levels of nitrile hydratase and amidase activity in the two nitrile-degrading strains was of particular interest. The levels of iBN and iBA hydrolysis activity were tested either with washed cells grown with iBN at pH 10 or with cell extract. Several significant differences between the profiles for whole cells and cell extract and between the pH profiles for activity of ANL-iso2 and ANL-iso4 were observed (Fig. 3). Whole cells clearly tolerated a much broader pH spectrum than the enzymes that were no longer protected by the cell membrane from the external pH condition, although in ANL-iso2, this difference was somewhat less dramatic than in ANL-iso4. Another difference between these two organisms was in the higher alkali tolerance of the nitrile-degrading enzymes in the actinobacterium.
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Influence of pH on the activities of the nitrile hydratase/amidase systems in strains ANL-iso2 (a, b) and ANL-iso4 (c, d). (a and c) NH3 formation from iBN. (b and d) NH3 formation from iBA. Symbols: closed circles, whole cells; open circles, cell extract. The average values of the results from two independent experiments with deviations of 5 to 10% are shown.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Range of substrates converted by washed cells of nitrile-hydrolyzing haloalkaliphilesa
|
|
|
|---|
As is usually the case with most isolates from soda lake sediments and soda soils, the new bacteria showed typical haloalkaliphilic properties and, as such, represent a new branch of nitrile/amide-hydrolyzing biocatalysts. Whole-cell catalysis is common practice in nitrile bioconversion, since both nitrile hydratase and nitrilase are very unstable enzymes in their free forms. Therefore, further exploration of potential applications for haloalkaliphilic nitrile-degrading bacteria might be interesting.
Another interesting aspect of this study is the consortial way of utilizing iBN found in both soda lake sediment and soda soil microbial communities, although the type of interaction between the members differs. In the soda lake sediment coculture, only the amide-scavenging member is obligately dependent on the nitrile-hydrolyzing partner. The key to understanding why a coculture was selected instead of a monoculture in this case lies in the growth kinetics parameters of the two organisms (Table 1 and Fig. 2a). The highly disproportionate rates of catabolism of iBN and the further utilization of the products by the actinobacterium allowed the Marinospirillum, a scavenger growing several times faster on the degradation products, to efficiently pair with the slowly growing nitrile-hydrolyzing partner (a provider). The fact that the Marinospirillum sp. has been selected as a scavenger for iBA might not be accidental, assuming the potential of this particular group to utilize various organic nitrogen compounds originated from anaerobic protein degradation and haloalkaliphily (18).
In contrast, the iBN-utilizing coculture selected from soda soils might be regarded as mutualistic, where both members were obligately dependent on each other. The nitrile-hydrolyzing Bacillus strain ANL-iso4 was dependent on growth factors most probably supplied by the second organism, Bacillus strain ANL-isoa2, which in turn utilized the products of iBN hydrolysis. Although the latter could be replaced by yeast extract or B-type vitamins, it is still unclear whether other types of interactions were involved in this case as well. Care should be taken, however, in extrapolating from these two examples of bacterial interaction to natural situations with highly heterogeneous conditions, metabolic microdiversity, and much lower concentrations of substrates.
Published ahead of print on 20 July 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
-aminoacids. Tetrahedron 50:1539-1650.[CrossRef]This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»