Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 2007, p. 5782-5788, Vol. 73, No. 18
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.00838-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Laboratoire de Chimie Physique et Microbiologie pour l'Environnement, Nancy-Université, CNRS, 405, rue de Vandoeuvre, F-54600 Villers-lès-Nancy, France
Received 13 April 2007/ Accepted 10 July 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
During the past two decades, attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy has proven to be a useful analytical tool for monitoring biofilms in situ nondestructively in real time and under fully hydrated conditions (11, 19, 35). Furthermore, Boualam et al. (10) showed that biofilm monitoring by the ATR-FTIR technique is able to discriminate within 10 h water samples containing variable quantities of biodegradable organic matter. This result suggests that drinking water biostability could be assessed by monitoring the evolution of the ATR-FTIR spectrum of an appropriate reference biofilm exposed to the water being tested. This paper explores and develops this idea. For this purpose, the responses of nascent Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms to variations in the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in low-nutrient tap water were monitored by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. P. fluorescens was chosen as the reference bacterium for several reasons: (i) it is present in drinking water distribution networks (46); (ii) it is able to grow in low-nutrient situations (50); (iii) it is used in a standard procedure used for measurement of assimilable organic carbon in water (4, 50); (iv) the Pseudomonas group is a good indicator of potential regrowth in water distribution systems (39); (v) and P. fluorescens has been widely used in model bacterial surface colonization studies (2, 15, 26, 36).
|
|
|---|
Preparation of bacterial inocula.
When the cells reached the end of the exponential growth phase, they were harvested by centrifugation (10,000 x g, 10 min, 4°C), and the pellet was resuspended in sterile LB medium (0.5 g/liter). The bacterial concentration of the resulting suspension was adjusted to obtain an optical density at 620 nm of 0.28, equivalent to
108 CFU/ml. The suspension was left at room temperature (21 ± 1°C) for 15 min on a magnetic stirrer before inoculation into the flow system.
Water samples.
Water samples were taken from the drinking water distribution network of Villers-lès-Nancy (France) and were left uncovered for 24 h to dechlorinate them. They were then supplemented with different amounts of LB medium to obtain various DOC concentrations ranging from 1.5 to 11.8 mg/liter. All water samples were filter sterilized through 0.22-µm-pore-size membrane filters (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA). The pH and ionic strength of solutions were 6.8 ± 0.1 and about 3 mM, respectively. The glassware used was heated at 550 ± 1°C for 4 h to remove any traces of carbon.
Bacterial enumeration procedures.
Viable cell enumeration was done in triplicate on R2A agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) by the spread plate technique. Counting was performed after incubation of plates at 21 ± 1°C for 48 h. The total cell number was determined by staining 1-ml portions of serial dilutions of the sample tested with 0.5 µl of SYBR green II (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 20 min in the dark. Then samples were vortexed for 1 min to disrupt any cell clumps, filtered through a 0.22-µm-pore-size Millipore polycarbonate membrane filter (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA), and rinsed three times with nonpyrogenic sterile water (Aqua B; Braun, Melsungen, Germany). Membranes supporting bacteria were mounted on a glass microscope slide. Bacteria were counted using an Olympus BX51 epifluorescence microscope (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a 100x (N.A. 1.30) oil immersion objective and an appropriate filter set (excitation wavelength, 488 nm; 500-nm long-pass dichroic mirror; 520- ± 10-nm band-pass emission filter). Images were collected using a Colorview III charge-coupled device camera from Soft Imaging System. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
DOC measurement.
DOC concentrations were measured with a total organic carbon (TOC) analyzer (model 5050A; Shimadzu, Melbourne, Australia) according to standard method 5310B (4). Inorganic carbon was eliminated with phosphoric acid (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and by purified oxygen bubbling. Prior to each series of measurements, the TOC analyzer was calibrated with a potassium phthalate solution (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The detection limit was 0.1 mg/liter.
Flow system and ATR flow cell.
The flow system used for growing biofilms and monitoring their evolution over time is shown in Fig. 1. It consisted of an inoculation flask that was placed onto the surface of a magnetic stirrer to provide constant mixing, an ATR-FTIR flow cell (SPECAC, Kent, United Kingdom), a peristaltic pump (Minipuls 3; Gilson's, Villiers-le-Bel, France), and a waste reservoir, all connected by silicone tubing (inside diameter, 5 mm; Versilic). The ATR-FTIR flow cell was designed to enclose a trapezoidal crystal (72 by 10 by 6 mm) with an incidence angle of 45°, yielding six internal reflections on the upper face in contact with the sample. The ATR cell was sealed with Kalrez O-rings. Prior to each experiment, the flow cell was dismantled, cleaned with a 2% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 solution, and successively rinsed with hot tap water, ethanol, hot tap water again, and finally nonpyrogenic sterile water. Immediately after this cleaning process, the flow cell was reassembled and connected to the flow system by sterile silicone tubing. The whole flow system was then disinfected with 70% ethanol for 5 h and rinsed with nonpyrogenic sterile water for 24 h. The cleaning and disinfection procedure quality was controlled both by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and by counting bacterial cells in water samples taken at the inlet and outlet of the flow system.
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup used for growing P. fluorescens biofilms on the ATR crystal surface and monitoring changes in the biofilm ATR-FTIR fingerprint in real time.
|
(ii) Sampling depth.
In ATR-FTIR spectroscopy, the sample (the rare medium) is placed in contact with the ATR crystal (the dense medium), an internal reflection element (IRE) with a high refractive index (Fig. 1). The infrared beam is focused onto the edge of the IRE, multiply reflected on the inner surface of the ATR crystal, and then directed to a suitable detector. At each reflection at the sample-ATR crystal interface, an evanescent wave is created in the rare medium, where it can be absorbed. The electric field amplitude of this evanescent wave decays exponentially with distance from the crystal surface. The penetration depth (dp) of the evanescent wave is defined as the distance at which the evanescent wave drops to e–1 times its intensity at the surface of the IRE. It is determined by the following equation: dp =
/[2
(nc2 sin2
– ns2)1/2], where
is the wavelength of the incident radiation, nc is the refractive index of the IRE, ns is the refractive index of the rare medium in contact with the IRE, and
is the angle of incidence (21). For all experiments, a germanium IRE with a
of 45° and an nc of 4.0 was used. Considering the anomalous dispersion of water and the refraction index of bacterial components in the mid-infrared region (5, 38), the ns of the rare medium was estimated to be around 1.43 ± 0.1. Thus, the depths of penetration were calculated to be 0.22 ± 0.01, 0.42 ± 0.01, and 0.59 ± 0.01 µm at 2,990, 1,550, and 1,100 cm–1, respectively. Consequently, only bacteria that were immediately adjacent to the crystal surface were detected. The IRE surface area exposed to cell suspensions was approximately 8 by 48 mm.
Biofilm development on the IRE surface.
Inoculation and introduction of a water sample into the flow system were carried out under sterile conditions, carefully avoiding formation of air bubbles in the flow cell. The flow rate was maintained at 0.7 ml/min.
(i) Initial attachment of bacteria.
After cleaning and disinfection procedures, the flow cell was successively and aseptically supplied with (i) sterile LB medium (0.5 g/liter) for 24 h to establish a conditioning film on the IRE surface and to provide a background spectrum for the subsequent bacterial spectra and (ii) a bacterial suspension containing
108 CFU/ml in sterile LB medium (0.5 g/liter) for 3 h to initiate attachment of P. fluorescens bacteria to the IRE. The inflow tubing of the ATR cell was then replaced by new sterile silicone tubing to avoid bacterial contamination of the subsequent water samples.
(ii) Influence of DOC level on the evolution of nascent P. fluorescens biofilms.
Nascent biofilms were exposed to sterile LB medium (0.5 g/liter, corresponding to 165 mg DOC/liter) for 3 h to promote P. fluorescens biofilm development and/or to a series of dechlorinated and sterile water samples containing DOC at concentrations ranging from 1.5 to 11.8 mg/liter. Samples were pumped through the ATR cell at a rate of 0.7 ml/min for 15 to 50 h. When the solution was changed, an air bubble was passed through the flow system under sterile conditions so that solutions did not mix as far as possible.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. ATR-FTIR spectra of P. fluorescens planktonic bacteria harvested at the end of the exponential phase (spectrum a) and a 6-h-old P. fluorescens biofilm formed by successive flow of a bacterial suspension for 3 h and sterile LB medium (0.5 g/liter) over the germanium IRE (spectrum b). The spectra have been vertically shifted for clarity and normalized to the amide II band. str., stretch; sym., symmetric; asym., asymmetric; a.u., arbitrary units.
|
108 CFU/ml) in sterile LB medium (0.5 g/liter). This 3-h period proved to be relevant for forming nascent biofilms which resulted in ATR-FTIR spectra that had good signal-to-noise ratios but were far from saturation. The latter point was essential to detect under good conditions all subsequent spectral changes of a nascent biofilm in response to environmental parameter changes. ATR-FTIR spectra acquired over this period (Fig. 3) were similar to planktonic bacterium spectra (Fig. 2), in particular, regarding the relative intensities and the amide II/PS band intensity ratio. As illustrated in Fig. 4 for the amide II band, the intensity of all bands increased with time. These results reflected accumulation of biomass on the IRE surface and an increase in the IRE surface coverage by bacteria. Optical microscope images of 3-h biofilms showed P. fluorescens cells arranged mainly as a monolayer on the IRE surface (Fig. 3). The surface coverage of bacteria was 65% ± 15%. These results are in agreement with a previous study of Korber et al. (26) which reported that P. fluorescens bacteria obeyed monolayer attachment kinetics and the saturation of surfaces by a monolayer of colonizing bacteria does not equal the total available area during attachment of P. fluorescens. As observed previously in similar experiments with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (25), the rate of increase was reduced as the surface coverage increased. For this attachment period, the plot of the amide II band area (A) versus time can be fitted using the following equation: A = Amax(1 – e–kt), where Amax is the amide II band area corresponding to a complete bacteria single layer, k is an absorption rate constant, and t is time (Fig. 4a). It should be noted that small changes in the culture conditions, growth phase, or number of bacteria inoculated into the flow system may slightly modify adhesion kinetics (54) and/or result in the appearance of a latency period before colonization (44). However, we observed that the differences in adhesion kinetics did not alter the subsequent response of the nascent biofilms to environmental condition changes.
![]() View larger version (43K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Temporal evolution of ATR-FTIR spectra during initial attachment of P. fluorescens to the germanium IRE. A suspension containing bacteria at the end of the exponential phase ( 108 CFU/ml) in sterile LB medium (0.5 g/liter) was introduced into the flow cell at time zero and flowed through the cell for 3 h. The optical microscope image (magnification, x100) shows the nascent P. fluorescens biofilm attached to the Ge IRE after the 3-h inoculation period. Bar = 10 µm. a.u., arbitrary units.
|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Impact of the drastic reduction in the DOC level on development of nascent P. fluorescens biofilms attached to the Ge crystal. After 3 h of inoculation (dashed line), nascent biofilms were exposed to LB medium (165 mg DOC/liter) (experiment a) and dechlorinated sterile tap water (2.8 mg DOC/liter) (experiment b) under flow conditions. The solid line represents the nonlinear regression fit determined only for the data set for the 3-h inoculation period of experiment a using the equation A = Amax(1 – e–kt) (k = 0.24 h–1; regression coefficient R2 = 0.997). a.u., arbitrary units.
|
Nascent biofilm development under dechlorinated sterile drinking water flow conditions.
As shown in Fig. 4b for the amide II band, development of a 3-h biofilm was quite different in tap water that was much less nutritive than 0.5-g/liter LB medium containing 165 mg DOC/liter, when all other parameters, including the temperature, pH, ionic strength, flow rate, and oxygen concentration, were identical in the two experiments. The intensity of all bands stopped increasing and declined rapidly within 1 h after the bacterial suspension was replaced with dechlorinated sterile drinking water containing 2.8 mg DOC/liter. Whereas steady absorbance was observed within 1 min after the pH or ionic strength was changed (30), the absorbance decreased continuously for about 20 h and then plateaued. This result is consistent with the suggestion that nascent biofilms of P. fluorescens partially detached in response to nutrient stress, as reported previously by Delaquis et al. (15). Allison et al. (2) suggested that the enzymatic degradation of EPS has a specific role in the detachment of P. fluorescens biofilms under starvation conditions. Moreover, as reported previously (23, 53), cells grown in rich nutrient-containing LB medium are more sensitive to transfer to low-nutrient medium.
Nascent biofilm response to variations in DOC level in tap water over a 12-day period.
To confirm the previous findings and to explore the evolution of the nascent P. fluorescens biofilm response to variations in the DOC level over the course of time, a 3-h P. fluorescens biofilm was successively subjected to sterile LB medium and a series of sterile drinking water samples with DOC levels ranging from 1.5 to 11.8 mg/liter for durations of exposure between 15 and 50 h. As shown by the evolution of the amide II band area in Fig. 5, any variation in DOC level rapidly modified the kinetics of biofilm development. The response time was 1 to 2 h. For water samples containing DOC at a concentration less than about 5.3 mg/liter, the intensity of all bands continuously decreased in the first 15 to 20 h, reflecting, as shown previously (Fig. 4b), gradual detachment induced by starvation. Conversely, for water samples containing more than 5.3 mg DOC/liter, the intensity of all bands increased again, indicating that there was biofilm regrowth on the IRE surface. This biofilm regrowth is highlighted in Fig. 6 in the case of the water sample containing 11.8 mg DOC/liter. Over the course of this stage the amide II/PS band intensity ratio changed little and was similar to the ratio observed during the initial attachment period, suggesting that biofilm regrowth was mainly due to the growth of surface-attached bacteria. As shown in Fig. 6, the amide II band area increased exponentially with time, indicating that there was exponential lateral growth of bacteria still attached to the surface at this time. Assuming that the increase in the amide II band area was approximately proportional to the increase in the number of bacteria on the surface, the fit displayed in Fig. 6 yielded a specific growth rate of 0.36 h–1, which was higher than the specific planktonic growth rate of 0.23 h–1 determined in suspension cultures. A shorter generation time in biofilms than in planktonic populations has been observed previously during early biofilm formation (8). Furthermore, this growth rate in biofilms is consistent with the growth rates reported by Mueller (32) for P. aeruginosa and P. fluorescens biofilms on stainless steel. As clearly shown in Fig. 5, detachment and regrowth rates were dependent on the DOC level. In addition, the biofilm response was quite reproducible over the course of the experiment, and similar DOC levels resulted in qualitatively similar responses. However, it was difficult to establish an acute relationship between detachment and regrowth rates and the DOC level. This could have been due to ageing of the reference biofilm and, in particular, changes in the physiological state of bacteria over the course of the experiment. Indeed, the physiological state of bacteria which regrew after starvation should have been different from that of the original bacteria which grew in the nutrient-rich LB medium. Previous studies demonstrated that a range of different bacteria display enhanced adhesion after starvation or after growth in low-nutrient medium (24) and that bacterial cells grown under low-nutrient conditions are physiologically more tolerant than bacterial cells isolated from higher-nutrient conditions (23, 53). This also could explain why the response amplitude appeared to decrease over time and the spectral profile changed after 125 h, particularly in the PS region (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Effect of DOC level changes on P. fluorescens biofilm development monitored by changes in the amide II band area. After the 3-h inoculation period ( ), the nascent biofilm attached to the Ge IRE was subjected to sterile LB medium for 3 h ( ) and then a series of dechlorinated sterile drinking water samples containing various DOC levels under flow conditions. The DOC level (in mg/liter) is indicated for each water sample. a.u., arbitrary units.
|
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Exponential fit of the amide II band area change with time when the nascent P. fluorescens biofilm was exposed to dechorinated drinking water containing 11.8 mg DOC/liter, the eighth stage in Fig. 5. The time origin corresponds to the moment when the water sample was introduced into the flow cell. (regression coefficient R2 = 0.996). a.u., arbitrary units.
|
In conclusion, the results presented in this paper support the idea that in situ and in real time, drinking water biostability can be monitored via a biosensor based on the ATR-FTIR fingerprint of a nascent reference biofilm through a bypass system in order to avoid any contamination of the water being tested. In comparison with the established methods for assessing drinking water biostability, the major advantages of using such a biosensor should be (i) an early warning capacity (within 2 h), in particular because the reference biofilm is nascent, (ii) in situ assessment of drinking water biostability, and (iii) sensitive detection of any factor promoting biofilm growth, not only changes in the organic carbon concentration. However, further investigations are needed to confirm and extend the results of the present study and to consider implementation of such a biosensor in real drinking water systems. In particular, studies are currently being carried out in three main areas: (i) enhancement of biosensor sensitivity by optimizing reference biofilm formation, (ii) improvement of the correlation between nascent biofilm detachment or growth rate and the nature of the biodegradable organic matter, and (iii) evaluation of the effect of other parameters, such pH, temperature, disinfectant concentration, and hydrodynamic conditions, on the nascent reference biofilm response.
The authors are solely responsible for this work, which does not represent the opinion of the European Community. The European Community is not responsible for any use that might be made of data appearing here.
We thank Hélène Guilloteau for technical assistance.
Published ahead of print on 20 July 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»