Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rieu, A. Articles by Guzzo, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rieu, A. Articles by Guzzo, J. Agricola Articles by Rieu, A. Articles by Guzzo, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2007, p. 6125-6133, Vol. 73, No. 19
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.00608-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

agr System of Listeria monocytogenes EGD-e: Role in Adherence and Differential Expression Pattern

Aurélie Rieu,¹ Stéphanie Weidmann,² Dominique Garmyn,¹ Pascal Piveteau,^1* and Jean Guzzo²

UMR 1229 Microbiologie du Sol et de l'Environnement, Université de Bourgogne, INRA, F-21000 Dijon, France,¹ Laboratoire REVV, Université de Bourgogne, IUVV, F-21000 Dijon, France²

Received 16 March 2007/ Accepted 27 July 2007

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
In this study, we investigated the agrBDCA operon in the pathogenic bacterium Listeria monocytogenes EGD-e. In-frame deletion of agrA and agrD resulted in an altered adherence and biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces, suggesting the involvement of the agr system of L. monocytogenes during the early stages of biofilm formation. Real-time PCR experiments indicated that the transcript levels of agrBDCA depended on the stage of biofilm development, since the levels were lower after the initial attachment period than during biofilm growth, whereas transcription during planktonic growth was not growth phase dependent. The mRNA quantification data also suggested that the agr system was autoregulated and pointed to a differential expression of the agr genes during sessile and planktonic growth. Although the reverse transcription-PCR experiments revealed that the four genes were transcribed as a single messenger, chemical half-life and 5' RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) experiments indicated that the full size transcript underwent cleavage followed by degradation of the agrC and agrA transcripts, which suggests a complex regulation of agr transcription.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Listeria monocytogenes is a gram-positive human pathogenic bacterium; it is the causative agent of listeriosis, a serious infection characterized by high mortality rates, in immunocompromised individuals and pregnant women (19). This pathogenic bacterium is widely spread in the environment (soil, vegetation, animals, farm environment, etc.). In connection with these extended reservoirs, L. monocytogenes is also a contaminant of the food industry. Its presence on working surfaces in food-processing plants is a major problem as a source of food contamination (1, 32). Like most bacteria, L. monocytogenes is able to colonize surfaces and form biofilms (sessile growth) while, in natural environments, free-floating cells (planktonic growth) are transitory (28). Several steps can be identified during biofilm development: after an initial step of reversible and then irreversible adherence, bacteria grow as microcolonies and spread on the surface. Finally, biofilms develop as complex, three-dimensional structures during the maturation step (17). Biofilm development and maturation requires complex cellular mechanisms in which cell-cell communication is involved (14, 30). To date, three major signaling systems have been identified; to regulate these systems, bacterial extracellular signaling molecules called autoinducers are produced (8). The acylhomoserine lactones have been identified as autoinducers in gram-negative bacteria (3, 13, 27, 46). The autoinducer 2 is found in both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria (5, 7, 11, 35, 36, 54). Finally, peptide-mediated signaling pathways have been characterized in gram-positive bacteria. Among these, the agr system has been described initially in Staphylococcus aureus (41); the production of many of its virulence factors (toxins, enzymes, and cell surface proteins) is regulated by this system (4). The role of the agr system during S. aureus biofilm development is complex (57). It depends on the hydrodynamic conditions of the experimental setup. Under static conditions agr expression reduces the attachment of the cells to the surface (52, 55), and under turbulent dynamic conditions agr expression may affect biofilm maturation (55). Orthologs of the agr system have also been described in Enterococcus faecalis (fsr) (45), Lactobacillus plantarum (lam) (48), and L. monocytogenes (agr) (6). In E. faecalis, expression of a gelatinase (GelE) is fsr dependent (45). In L. plantarum, the lam system plays a role during biofilm development (48).

In L. monocytogenes, the four genes (agrB, agrD, agrC, and agrA) of the agr locus are organized as an operon (Fig. 1A). They encode the two-component histidine kinase AgrC and response regulator AgrA, a precursor peptide AgrD and AgrB, a protein that is involved in the processing of AgrD into a matured autoinducing peptide. Limited data concerning the role of the agr locus on the physiology of L. monocytogenes are available. Williams et al. (53) showed that among 16 putative response regulator genes of L. monocytogenes EGD-e, in-frame deletion in agrA did not affect the growth in brain heart infusion (BHI) medium at various temperatures (20, 37, and 43°C), in the presence of 9% NaCl, 5% ethanol, or 0.025% H₂O₂. Swimming motility was also not affected. No alteration of virulence could be identified during in vitro infection of cell cultures nor in vivo after intravenous infection of BALB/c mice. In a previous study, Autret et al. (6) reported a moderate attenuation of the virulence in Swiss mice after insertion of Tn1545 in the L. monocytogenes EGD-e agrA gene.

View larger version (23K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. (A) Schematic diagram of L. monocytogenes agr operon. The gray arrows indicate the orientation and the size in base pairs of the four genes. Numbers between parentheses indicate the size in base pairs of the two intergenic regions. Arrowheads indicate the positions of the oligonucleotides used for real-time PCR: b (BR2; BF2), d (DF2; DR2), c (CF2; CR2), and a (AF2; AR2). The black lines indicate the probes used for Northern blotting (NB, NC, and NA). The position of the transcription initiation site and the transcription termination site are indicated, respectively, by the bent arrow and the gray dot. (B and C) DNA and deduced amino acid sequences of agrA gene containing a 106-bp deletion in DG125A (agrA) mutant (B) and of agrD gene containing a 49-bp deletion in DG119D (agrD) mutant (C). The position of the deletion is represented by an inverted black triangle, the nucleotides before and after the deletion are mentioned, the ribosome binding sites are underlined, the start codons are boxed, and the stop codon is represented by three asterisks.

To further elucidate the role of the agr system, we first of all examined its involvement during attachment to abiotic surfaces and biofilm growth. agrA and agrD in-frame deletion mutants were compared to the parental strain EGD-e during sessile growth. Second, we determined the expression pattern of the four genes of the agr operon during planktonic and sessile growth, and we evidenced posttranscriptional events during expression of this operon.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Bacterial strains and growth media.
The bacterial strains and plasmids used in the present study and their characteristics are shown in Table 1. L. monocytogenes EGD-e, isolated from a rabbit listeriosis outbreak (39), and two mutants, derivatives of L. monocytogenes EGD-e, L. monocytogenes DG119D (agrD) and L. monocytogenes DG125A (agrA) were grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB; Biokar Diagnostics, Pantin, France) at 25°C for biofilm and planktonic cultures and in brain heart infusion broth (BHI; Biokar Diagnostics) at 40°C for mutant construction. Escherichia coli TOP10 and Match1 (Invitrogen, Cergy Pontoise, France) were grown aerobically in Luria-Bertani broth (LB; Biokar Diagnostics) at 37°C. When appropriate, antibiotics (Sigma, St. Quentin Fallavier, France) were added as follows: kanamycin, 50 µg ml^–1 (E. coli); ampicillin, 200 µg ml^–1 (E. coli); and chloramphenicol, 10 µg ml^–1 (L. monocytogenes) (Table 1).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

In-frame deletion of agrD and agrA genes.
The mutant strains listed in Table 1, carrying an in-frame deletion in the response regulator agrA or in the precursor peptide agrD genes, were constructed from the parental strain L. monocytogenes EGD-e by using a two-step integration/excision procedure (10) that is based on the mutagenesis plasmid pGF-EM (33).

First, for the construction of an agrA in-frame deletion mutant, primers C13 and A12 (Table 2) were used to amplify a 600-bp DNA fragment including the 3' end of agrC and the ATG of agrA. The PCR product was cloned into pGF-EM (33) after digesting this PCR product and vector with HindIII/XbaI. The resulting plasmid, pGID121 was transformed into chemically competent E. coli Match1 as recommended by the manufacturer (Invitrogen). Primers A15 and E2 (Table 2) were used to amplify a 500-bp internal fragment of agrA. The resulting fragment was cloned into pCR2.1 TOPO vector (Invitrogen) to obtain plasmid pGID118. This vector was transferred into E. coli TOP10. Plasmid pGID118 was digested with NheI/EcoRI and the resulting 500-bp fragment containing an internal part of agrA was ligated into pGID121 restricted with XbaI/EcoRI to obtain pGID125. This plasmid was electroporated into L. monocytogenes EGD-e.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Oligonucleotides used in this study

Second, a similar strategy was used for the construction of an agrD in-frame deletion mutant. Primers D1 and D2 (Table 2) were used to amplify a 400-bp DNA fragment including the 5' end of agrD. The PCR product was cloned into pGF-EM (33) to obtain pGID112. Primers D3 and D4 (Table 2) were used to amplify a 600-bp DNA fragment including the 3' end of agrD and the 5' end of agrC. The resulting fragment was cloned into pCR2.1 TOPO vector (Invitrogen) to obtain plasmid pGID109. After digestion, the plasmid pGID109 was ligated into digested plasmid pGID112 to obtain pGID119. This plasmid was electroporated into L. monocytogenes EGD-e.

Finally, transformants were selected on BHI agar plates (Biokar Diagnostics) containing 10 µg of chloramphenicol (Sigma) ml^–1. A transformant was serially subcultured in BHI at 40°C to direct chromosomal integration of the plasmid by homologous recombination. Chromosomal integration was confirmed by PCR and a single colony, with a chromosomal integration, was serially subcultured in BHI at 40°C and screened for loss of chloramphenicol resistance. Allelic exchange mutagenesis was confirmed by PCR amplification and direct sequencing of the PCR product (GENOME Express, Meylan, France). The mutants selected were named DG125A (agrA) and DG119D (agrD). The deletion of 106 bp in strain DG125A (agrA) (Fig. 1B) and the deletion of 49 bp in strain DG119D (agrD) (Fig. 1C) resulted in a frameshift causing the premature appearance of a stop codon and thus the premature stop of translation.

Adhesion on glass slide.
An overnight culture of the bacterium in TSB was used to inoculate (1/100, vol/vol) fresh TSB and was grown at 25°C to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.1. A portion (5 µl) of the culture to be tested was then deposited on a glass slide, and the glass slide was incubated for 2 h at 25°C. After incubation, the glass slide was washed twice in distilled water and the adhering cells were stained with a 0.1% (wt/vol) aqueous crystal violet solution for 1 min and washed with distilled water. Adhering cells were observed by using a Zeiss Axioplan 2 imaging microscope. For each experiment, 12 replicates resulting from three independent inocula were analyzed.

Biofilm formation on polystyrene microplate.
An overnight culture of the bacterium in TSB at 25°C was used to inoculate (1/100, vol/vol) fresh TSB. A total of 100 µl per well was dispensed on a 96-well microtiter plate (Nunc, Dominique Dutscher S.A., Brumath, France), which was then incubated at 25°C for 16 to 72 h. Cells attached to the well walls were quantified as previously described (16) with some modifications. After incubation, the medium was removed from each well, and the plates were washed twice by using a microtiter plate washer (Cellwash; Thermolabsystems, Cergy Pontoise, France) with 100 µl of 150 mM NaCl solution in order to remove loosely attached cells. The plates were then stained with a 0.05% (wt/vol) aqueous crystal violet solution for 45 min and washed three times. In order to quantitatively assess biofilm production, 100 µl of 96% ethanol (vol/vol) were added to each well, and the optical density at 595 nm (OD₅₉₅) was determined. For each experiment, 15 replicates resulting from three independent inocula were analyzed. Each microtiter plate included eight wells with sterile TSB as control.

Biofilm formation on stainless steel chips.
AISI 304 stainless steel chips of 8-cm diameter (Goodfellow SARL, Lille, France) were inserted in petri dishes containing 20 ml of inoculated TSB (1/100, vol/vol), followed by incubation at 25°C for 2 h to allow adhesion. For biofilm development, the medium was removed, and 20 ml of fresh TSB was added. Biofilms were grown for 24 and 72 h at 25°C. After incubation, the medium was removed, and 10 ml of saline solution (150 mM NaCl) was softly poured twice onto chips, followed by agitation for 1 min on an orbital shaker at 240 rpm (IKAKS 130 basic) to remove loosely adhering bacteria. Sessile cells were detached from chips in 10 ml of saline solution by scraping with a sterile disposable cell lifter (TPP; Dominique Dutscher S.A.).

RNA extraction and cDNA preparation.
Cells were harvested by centrifugation (10,000 x g, 5 min), resuspended in 1 ml of Tri-reagent (Sigma), and disrupted with glass beads (106 µm) in a FastPrep FP120 instrument (Thermo Savant-Bio 101) at 4°C for eight rounds of 30 s at 6,000 x g. Nucleic acids were extracted twice in 0.2 volume of chloroform and purified by precipitation in 1 volume of isopropanol. RNA pellets were dried and resuspended in 80 µl of RNase-free water. Nucleic acid concentrations were calculated by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm using a SmartSpec Plus spectrophotometer (Bio-Rad, Marnes La Coquette, France).

Before reverse transcription (RT), 2 µg of total RNA were treated with 2 U of DNase (Invitrogen) as described by the manufacturer. The absence of chromosomal DNA contamination was checked by real-time PCR. cDNA were then synthesized by using an iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad) as recommended.

Real-time PCR experiments.
Real-time PCR as described by Desroche et al. (15) was used to quantify mRNA levels. Gene-specific primers (Table 2 and Fig. 1A) were designed to amplify cDNAs of the transcripts of agrB, agrD, agrC, and agrA with the Bio-Rad SYBR green kit in a Bio-Rad I-Cycler. These gene-specific primers were designed outside zones of deletion, allowing the determination of the transcript levels of the agrB, agrD, agrC, and agrA genes in the parental strain and in both mutants DG125A (agrA) and DG119D (agrD). This method was used to analyze their mRNA level during planktonic growth at early exponential phase (6.5 x 10⁷ CFU ml^–1; OD₆₀₀ of 0.1), mid-exponential phase (2.5 x 10⁸ CFU ml^–1; OD₆₀₀ of 0.4), and stationary phase (4 x 10⁸ CFU ml^–1; OD₆₀₀ of 0.6) and after 2, 24, and 72 h of biofilm formation on AISI 304 stainless steel chips. The specificity of each primer pair was controlled by melting curves, and the mean of efficiencies for the five primer pairs was 98% ± 9%. The results were analyzed by using the comparative critical threshold method (C_T) in which the amount of targeted mRNA was first of all normalized using a specific mRNA standard and then compared to a calibrator condition (15). drm, a gene coding for a phosphopentomutase, was selected as an internal standard since drm transcript levels were stable in the conditions tested. For our work, the calibrator condition corresponded to the agrA mRNA level at an OD₆₀₀ of 0.1. The relative level of agrA mRNA at an OD₆₀₀ of 0.1 thus corresponded to 1. mRNA quantification was performed in triplicate from total RNA extracted from three independent cultures.

RT-PCR.
RT-PCR were performed with cDNA synthesized with total RNA extracted from three different mid-exponential phase cultures (OD₆₀₀ of 0.4) as described above. Specific primers (Table 2) were designed to amplify transcripts of the four genes and the two intergenic regions. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel (Invitrogen). Samples were checked for DNA contamination by performing PCR prior to RT.

Northern blotting.
Northern blot analysis were performed by fractionation of RNA samples on 1% (wt/vol) agarose gel containing 20% (wt/vol) formaldehyde. Then, 30 µg of total RNA was loaded into each well of the gel. Transfer to a nylon membrane (Hybond-N; Amersham, Orsay, France) was performed as recommended. Internal probes (Fig. 1A) of the agrB, agrC, and agrA genes were generated by PCR using primers described in Table 2. Portions (10 ng) of the PCR products were labeled with [-³²P]dATP (Amersham) by the random priming method according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen) to produce specific RNA probes. Sizes were determined with a RNA ladder (Invitrogen) as the molecular weight standard.

mRNA chemical half-life determination.
The chemical half-lives of mRNA of the four genes of the agr operon were determined from mid-exponential phase cultures (OD₆₀₀ of 0.4). Total RNA was isolated as described above from samples taken 1, 4, 7, and 10 min after rifampin treatment (250 µg ml^–1; Sigma). The half-life was determined for each gene by real-time PCR using the time at which rifampin was added as a calibrator and the 16S rRNA transcript levels as an internal standard.

Analysis of the 5' end of agr mRNA.
Primer extensions were performed by incubating 5 µg of RNA isolated from L. monocytogenes cells in planktonic growth, 20 pmol of oligonucleotide, 92 GBq of [-³²P]dATP (Perkin-Elmer, Courtaboeuf, France), and 100 U of SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). The oligonucleotides used in this experiment are described in Table 2. The corresponding DNA-sequencing reactions were carried out using the primers and Cycle Reader DNA sequencing kit as recommended by the manufacturer (Fermentas, Euromedex, Souffel Weyersheim, France).

A capping assay was used to distinguish 5' triphosphate (indicating initiation points) from 5' monophosphate (indicating processed products) according to the method of Bensing et al. (9), using a 5'-RACE kit (Ambion; Applied Biosystems, Courtaboeuf, France). Only 5' monophosphate are selectively ligated to an RNA oligonucleotide. The primary 5' end may be ligated only after removal of a 5' pyrophosphate through tobacco acid pyrophosphatase (TAP) activity. The oligonucleotides used in this experiment are described in Table 2. Sequencing of 5'-RACE products obtained from TAP-treated and nontreated RNA was performed to differentiate cleavage products from primary transcripts. Primers used for PCR amplification between adaptor and the gene of interest are described in Table 2. PCR products were sequenced by GENOME express.

Statistical analysis.
A one-way analysis of variance was performed by using SigmaStat version 3.0.1 software (SPSS, Inc.) in order to test the significance of the differences (i) in gene expression during planktonic growth and biofilm formation using the C_T value and (ii) in biofilm quantity. When one-way analysis of variance was significant, the Holm-Sidak test (n = 3, P < 0.05) was used to locate significant differences.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The DNA sequence data of the mutant strains described in the present study have been deposited in GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ under the accession numbers AM412557 and AM412558.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
The agr operon is involved during the sessile growth of L. monocytogenes EGD-e.
In order to study the involvement of the putative transcriptional regulator AgrA during sessile growth, an agrA in-frame deletion mutant of L. monocytogenes EGD-e was constructed. As expected, this mutation did not alter cell or colony morphology or planktonic growth (data not shown). In contrast, the glass slide adherence of mutant DG125A (agrA) was affected. Indeed, the number of adhered cells of DG125A was significantly reduced (n = 3, P < 0.05) by 62% compared to the parental strain EGD-e (Fig. 2A). Since cell-cell communication affects biofilm formation in many bacterial species, an agrD in-frame deletion was designed to generate a mutant unable to produce the putative autoinducer peptide processed from AgrD. As demonstrated in mutant DG125A (agrA), no pleiotropic effect was observed in mutant DG119D (agrD) (data not shown). Moreover, the adhesion phenotype of DG119D (agrD) was similar to that of DG125A (agrA) (Fig. 2A). Micrographs of the microscopic field of adhering cells on glass slides confirmed that the quantity of adhering cells with L. monocytogenes DG119D (agrD) and DG125A (agrA) was less compared to the parental strain EGD-e (Fig. 2B). These results suggested the involvement of the agr system during adhesion of L. monocytogenes, the first step in biofilm development.

View larger version (22K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. (A) L. monocytogenes EGD-e (), DG125A (agrA) (), and DG119D (agrD) () cell adhesion after 2 h of incubation at 25°C on glass slides. Histograms represent the number of adhered cells counted per microscopic field. Each bar indicates the mean of three independent experiments with four microscopic fields per experiment. (B) Micrographs of microscopic fields showing L. monocytogenes EGD-e, DG125A (agrA), and DG119D (agrD) cells adhering to glass slides after 2 h of incubation at 25°C. Magnification, x63.

The ability of L. monocytogenes EGD-e to develop biofilms on polystyrene was also affected by the deletion of agrA and agrD (Fig. 3). Indeed, there was significantly less biofilm (n = 3, P < 0.05) produced within the first 24 h of incubation. The differences were no longer significant during the later stages of biofilm formation, namely, at 48 and 72 h.

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 3. Biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes EGD-e (), DG125A (agrA) (), and DG119D (agrD) () in batch conditions in polystyrene 96-well plates after 16, 24, 48, and 72 h of incubation at 25°C. Each histogram indicates the mean of three independent experiments, with five measurements for each point.

In light of the sessile growth alteration observed in the mutants with deletion in the genes encoding the putative transcriptional regulator AgrA and the putative autoinducer peptide processed from AgrD, we therefore decided to investigate the expression of the agr operon during sessile and planktonic growth.

Relative expression and transcriptional autoregulation of the genes of the agr operon.
The transcription of the four genes of the agr operon was studied during sessile and planktonic growth using real-time PCR experiments with each of the four primer sets (Fig. 1A, b [BF2-BR2], d [DF2-DR2], c [CF2-CR2], and a [AF2-AR2], and Table 2). Analysis of the relative expression levels indicated that, during sessile growth, the levels of transcripts of agrB, agrD, and agrC were significantly lower (n = 3, P < 0.05) after 2 h of adhesion than after 24 and 72 h of sessile growth (Fig. 4A). For each gene, the differences in the relative expression observed between 24 and 72 h of biofilm growth were not significant. The levels of agrA transcripts were similar at 2, 24, and 72 h. Furthermore, during sessile growth, for each condition, the levels of transcripts of agrB, agrD, and agrC were never significantly different. In contrast, the relative expression levels of agrA, for each condition, were significantly lower (n = 3, P < 0.05) than those of agrB, agrD, and agrC.

View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 4. Semilogarithmic representations. (A) Relative expression levels of the agrB, agrD, agrC, and agrA genes of the parental strain L. monocytogenes EGD-e determined during biofilm formation (2, 24, and 72 h [the first three columns in each gene, respectively] and planktonic growth (early exponential phase OD600 of 0.1, mid-exponential phase OD600 of 0.4, and stationary phase OD600 of 0.6 [the second three columns for each gene, respectively]). (B) Relative expression levels of the agrB, agrD, agrC, and agrA genes of L. monocytogenes determined during mid-exponential phase OD600 of 0.4: EGD-e strain (), DG125A (agrA) strain (), and DG119D (agrD) strain (). For both graphs, gene expression was quantified by using real-time PCR and the comparative critical threshold (CT) method. The drm gene was used as the internal standard, and expression of the agrA gene in the early exponential phase (OD600 of 0.1) was used as the calibrator. Three independent experiments were performed; histograms indicate standard deviations.

During planktonic growth, the relative expression levels of each gene was not affected by the phase of growth. The levels of transcripts of agrB and agrD, for each condition, were never significantly different. In contrast, the relative expression levels of agrC and agrA, for each condition, were significantly lower (n = 3, P < 0.05) than those of agrB and agrD. For example, under our experimental conditions, at mid-exponential growth phase (OD₆₀₀ of 0.4) the agrC and agrA transcript levels were, respectively, 13- and 24-fold lower than the agrB transcript level (Fig. 4A).

The relative expression levels of the four genes of the agr operon were determined at mid-exponential phase during planktonic growth (OD₆₀₀ of 0.4) in the parental and mutant (agrA and agrD) backgrounds. In mutant DG125A (agrA), the relative expression levels of agrB, agrD, and agrC were significantly lower (n = 3, P < 0.05) than those of the parental strain EGD-e (Fig. 4B). Indeed, the relative transcript levels for agrB, agrD, and agrC were, respectively, of 56-, 68-, and 3-fold lower than those measured with the parental strain. A similar pattern of gene expression was observed for mutant DG119D (agrD) (Fig. 4B). In terms of the relative expression levels of agrA, no significant differences were observed between the mutants (DG119D and DG125A) and parental strains. These results suggest an autoregulation of the transcription of agrB, agrD, and agrC and a low constitutive expression of the putative transcriptional regulator AgrA.

The mRNA quantification data suggested that the agr system was autoregulated and pointed to a differential expression of the agr genes during sessile and planktonic growth. Either posttranscriptional processing or transcription from another promoter region, not yet identified, could account for these results.

Processing of the mRNA and identification of the 5' end of the mRNA agr operon.
In order to further investigate the hypothesis of a posttranscriptional processing, RT-PCR, Northern blotting, and mRNA chemical half-life were carried out. The four genes and the two intergenic regions were detected by RT-PCR (Fig. 5), indicating cotranscription of the complete agrBDCA operon and the presence of a full-size transcript. PCR on the RNA samples before RT gave no amplification signals, confirming that there was no contamination by genomic DNA (data not shown). However, a polycistronic mRNA was never detected by Northern blotting; only small size products were detected (data not shown). The mRNA chemical half-life was determined by using real-time PCR experiments with the primer sets described above (Fig. 1A and Table 2). The results indicated that the chemical half-lives of agrB and agrD transcripts were 7.4 and 6.8 min, respectively, while they were lower for agrC and agrA (4.3 and 4.1 min, respectively) (Fig. 6). To pinpoint these differences in chemical half-life and to highlight the differential expression pattern observed by real-time PCR, 5'-RACE experiments were carried out to search for transcription initiation points or cleavages within agrC and agrA transcripts. Regardless of the treatment with TAP, multiple PCR products were detected, confirming degradation after cleavage through RNase activity. After amplification with adequate primers (Table 2), four 5' ends were identified among the agrC fragments sequenced (Fig. 7). Similarly, five 5' ends were observed among the agrA fragments sequenced (Fig. 7). From two hypotheses formulated, data analysis confirmed posttranscriptional cleavage and degradation.

View larger version (40K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 5. RT-PCR analysis of RNA from L. monocytogenes cells at mid-exponential phase (OD600 of 0.4). (A) The dotted lines enclosed by arrows indicate the positions of the primers and PCR products. (B) The amplified products, lane numbers 1 to 4, were separated by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel and correspond, respectively, to the expected sizes of 567, 388, 435, and 353 bp. The sizes of the DNA marker fragments are indicated in base pairs.

View larger version (11K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 6. Chemical half-life of the transcripts of the agr operon. Semilogarithmic plots of mRNA decay corresponding to the agrB (-), agrD (), agrC (), and agrA () genes. Total RNA was prepared 0, 1, 4, 7, and 10 min after treatment with rifampin (250 µg ml–1). The results were obtained by real-time PCR analysis and normalized using 16S mRNA amounts. The correlation coefficient (R2) and half-life (t1/2) were determined for each regression analysis. Three independent experiments were carried out.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 7. Analysis of the 5' end of agrB, agrC, and agrA transcripts using total RNAs isolated from EGD-e cells collected during the exponential growth phase (OD600 of 0.4). #, 5' end identified by primer extension; *, processing sites identified by 5'-RACE. The putative –10 with TGn extension and –35 sequences are double underlined, the ribosome binding sites are underlined, the start codons are boxed, and the stop codon of agrC is represented by three asterisks.

5'-RACE was also used to characterize the 5' end of the mRNA agr operon. PCR amplification was observed in TAP-treated and untreated samples, suggesting a processing event at the 5' end, mapped by a "T" (Fig. 7). As expected, primer extension analysis with the three specific primers B34, B26, and B18 (Table 2) revealed two signals. They were separated by one nucleotide and corresponded to a "G" and the previously described "T." This finding suggested that the 5' end of the agr transcript was located 15 or 14 nucleotides upstream from the putative start codon (Fig. 7). Similar results were obtained in samples harvested at an OD₆₀₀ of 0.1, 0.4, and 0.6. Moreover, two hexanucleotides (TGGTTA and TAAAAT) separated by 18 nucleotides were detected upstream. They have similarities to the consensus –35 and –10 sequences of several promoters of housekeeping genes from gram-positive bacteria, as well as from E. coli (21, 23). Sequence conservation is higher in the –10 region than in the –35 region, and a TGn extension was observed upstream of the –10 region. Similar features were found in several promoters of gram-positive bacteria (20, 38).

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Orthologs of the agr system, initially described in S. aureus, have been reported in L. plantarum, E. faecalis, and L. monocytogenes (6, 44, 48, 56). Thus far, the role of the agr system has not been clearly described in the pathogenic bacterium L. monocytogenes. In the present study, we investigated the role of agrA and agrD in the sessile growth of L. monocytogenes, and we focused on the molecular characterization of the transcription of the agr operon. In-frame deletions of agrA, which encodes a transcriptional regulator, or in-frame deletions of agrD encoding a propeptide affected adhesion and the early stages of biofilm formation on glass and polystyrene surfaces within the first 24 h of incubation. No significant differences were observed afterward. These results are in accordance with those obtained by Sturme et al. (48) with a lamA mutant of L. plantarum WCFS1. Indeed, the lamA mutant was impaired in its ability to adhere to glass surfaces. It showed 1.5- and 1.7-fold decreases in glass adherence compared to the parental strain after 24 and 48 h, respectively. In contrast, Vuong et al. (52), working with S. aureus RN6390 and 601055, demonstrated that their agr genotype led to a pronounced attachment to polystyrene, 1.8- and 2.5-fold increases, respectively, compared to that of the isogenic agr⁺ wild type after 24 h. Biofilm-associated infections have special clinical relevance, and in staphylococcal infections these diseases include endocarditis, osteomyelitis, implanted device-related infections, and even some skin infections (54). Indeed, the agr biofilm phenotype may have important consequences. For example, the dysfunction of agr is correlated with persistent bacteremia in S. aureus (49), and mutation of the S. aureus agr system increased bacterial persistence (52), suggesting that interference with cell-cell communication would enhance rather than suppress this important type of staphylococcal disease (42).

In our experimental conditions, growth-phase-dependent transcriptional regulation was not observed during planktonic growth. This is in agreement with a previous report showed that during exponential and stationary phases the amount of agrB and agrC mRNAs was not significantly different (6), although a twofold difference in the quantity of agrA transcripts was recorded by these authors. In contrast, the transcription of the orthologous agr, lam, and fsr operons from S. aureus MN NJ, L. plantarum WCFS1, and E. faecalis OG1RF, respectively, increased from early to mid-exponential phase, suggesting growth-phase-dependent transcription upregulation (44, 48, 56).

During sessile growth, the transcription of the agr genes depended on the stage of biofilm development, suggesting that this system is important during biofilm development. Interestingly, a significant decrease in the transcript levels of agrB, agrD, and agrC was observed after initial attachment. At first glance, this may seem surprising since initial attachment is the step where agr impairment is most detrimental to biofilm formation; this points out that developmental regulations involved during sessile growth are complex (22). In L. monocytogenes, agr-dependent regulation may be transitory during biofilm formation as was observed in other systems. For example, two communication systems (las and rhl) play a role in transitional episodes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. The Las regulon is involved in early biofilm development but not in later stages; in contrast, the Rhl regulon plays a role in the maturation of the biofilm (14, 46). The agr system of L. monocytogenes could also regulate the expression of proteins necessary for the ability to attach to abiotic surfaces without being involved once the cells attach to the surface. Indeed, in S. aureus and S. epidermidis, agr-dependent regulation of the expression of several adhesion proteins has been demonstrated (12, 34).

Significant differences were measured in the relative quantities of the transcripts of agrB, agrD, agrC, and agrA, while the differences between the transcripts of agrB and agrD were never significantly different. This observation suggested either posttranscriptional processing of the full-size agr transcript of L. monocytogenes or the presence of another promoter region between agrD and agrC. Determination of 5' ends corresponding to cleavage, and not to initiation transcription points, supported the posttranscriptional events hypothesis. Indeed, several 5' ends were detected within agrC and agrA transcripts. This suggested also that most of the transcripts quantified by real-time PCR were degradation products generated after cleavage of the full-length transcript, probably within the intergenic region or at the 5' end of agrC and agrA. These posttranscriptional events may have regulatory functions resulting in a differential stability and a rapid processing of the mRNA. This could account for a fine tuning of the expression of the individual genes of the agr operon, as has previously been suggested for the pattern of expression of other loci of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria (2, 24, 25, 37, 40). Moreover, our work indicated that the agr operon of L. monocytogenes was autoregulated in a positive way since the deletion of agrA or agrD reduced the transcription of agrB, agrD, and agrC, although agrA transcription was not agr dependent. A similar pattern has been described in the orthologous fsr system of E. faecalis in which the expression of fsrB, fsrD, and fsrC is fsr dependent, whereas the expression of the fsrA is weak, constitutive, and fsr independent (29, 45). It is proposed, on the one hand, that the regulator is constitutively expressed in order to provide a basal amount of regulator ready to respond to the presence of the signal in the environment of the cell; on the other hand, when the signal is high in the environment of the cell, it would induce the expression of the transmembrane protein, the propeptide and the sensor. This, in turn, would enable the transfer of the signal to the neighboring cells and prepare the cell for the monitoring of an amplified signal (18, 26).

Two 5' ends of the agr mRNA were determined. One was mapped to a "G" and located at an appropriate distance downstream of the putative promoter region (43), leading us to consider it as the apparent start site for the promoter of the agr operon. The second 5' end identified was located one base downstream of the 5' end of the primary transcript. Such cleavage of one nucleotide downstream of the initiation site may derive from a modification of the primary transcript by a phosphatase or pyrophosphatase or from endonucleolytic cleavage (31, 47, 50, 51). The significance of such commonly observed processing remains to be clarified.

In conclusion, this study is the first description of the involvement of cell-cell communication in the adherence of L. monocytogenes. Our data show that impairment of the response regulator or the propeptide resulted in a similarly altered adhesion and biofilm phenotype. The agr system of L. monocytogenes differed from the homologous systems previously described since posttranscriptional processing occurred at the site of the initiation of transcription and within the full-length transcript. It will be of interest to investigate the significance of such a processing in the expression of the agr system and in the physiology of L. monocytogenes.

 
This study was supported by the Ministère de l'Education Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie, the Université de Bourgogne, and the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique.

We thank Sofia Kathariou for providing the pGF-EM vector, Philippe Gaudu for critical reading of the manuscript, and Mary Boulay for reading of the English text.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: UMR 1229 Microbiologie du Sol et de l'Environnement, Université de Bourgogne, INRA, F-21000 Dijon, France. Phone: 33 3 80 39 68 93. Fax: 33 3 80 39 39 55. E-mail: piveteau{at}u-bourgogne.fr

Published ahead of print on 3 August 2007.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

1
1. Aguado, V., A. I. Vitas, and I. Garcia-Jalon. 2004. Characterization of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria innocua from a vegetable processing plant by RAPD and REA. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 90:341-347.[CrossRef][Medline]
2
2. Allenby, N. E. E., N. O'Connor, Z. Pragai, N. M. Carter, M. Miethke, S. Engelmann, M. Hecker, A. Wipat, A. C. Ward, and C. R. Harwood. 2004. Post-transcriptional regulation of the Bacillus subtilis pst operon encoding a phosphate-specific ABC transporter. Microbiology 150:2619-2628.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3
3. Allison, D. G., B. Ruiz, C. San Jose, A. Jaspe, and P. Gilbert. 1998. Extracellular products as mediators of the formation and detachment of Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 167:179-184.[CrossRef][Medline]
4
4. Arvidson, S., and K. Tegmark. 2001. Regulation of virulence determinants in Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 291:159-170.[CrossRef][Medline]
5
5. Auger, S., E. Krin, S. Aymerich, and M. Gohar. 2006. Autoinducer 2 affects biofilm formation by Bacillus cereus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:937-941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Autret, N., C. Raynaud, I. Dubail, P. Berche, and A. Charbit. 2003. Identification of the agr locus of Listeria monocytogenes: role in bacterial virulence. Infect. Immun. 71:4463-4471.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7
7. Balestrino, D., J. A. J. Haagensen, C. Rich, and C. Forestier. 2005. Characterization of type 2 quorum sensing in Klebsiella pneumoniae and relationship with biofilm formation. J. Bacteriol. 187:2870-2880.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8
8. Bassler, B. L. 2002. Small talk: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Cell 109:421-424.[CrossRef][Medline]
9
9. Bensing, B. A., B. J. Meyer, and G. M. Dunny. 1996. Sensitive detection of bacterial transcription initiation sites and differentiation from RNA processing sites in the pheromone-induced plasmid transfer system of Enterococcus faecalis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:7794-7799.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10
10. Bergmann, B., D. Raffelsbauer, M. Kuhn, M. Goetz, S. Hom, and W. Goebel. 2002. InlA- but not InlB-mediated internalization of Listeria monocytogenes by non-phagocytic mammalian cells needs the support of other internalins. Mol. Microbiol. 43:557-570.[CrossRef][Medline]
11
11. Challan Belval, S., L. Gal, S. Margiewes, D. Garmyn, P. Piveteau, and J. Guzzo. 2006. Assessment of the roles of LuxS, S-ribosyl homocysteine, and autoinducer 2 in cell attachment during biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes EGD-e. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:2644-2650.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12
12. Cramton, S. E., C. Gerke, N. F. Schnell, W. W. Nichols, and F. Gotz. 1999. The intercellular adhesion (ica) locus is present in Staphylococcus aureus and is required for biofilm formation. Infect. Immun. 67:5427-5433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13
13. Crossman, L., and J. M. Dow. 2004. Biofilm formation and dispersal in Xanthomonas campestris. Microbes Infect. 6:623-629.[CrossRef][Medline]
14
14. Davies, D. G., M. R. Parsek, J. P. Pearson, B. H. Iglewski, J. W. Costerton, and E. P. Greenberg. 1998. The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of bacterial biofilm. Science 280:295-298.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15
15. Desroche, N., C. Beltramo, and J. Guzzo. 2005. Determination of an internal control to apply reverse transcription quantitative PCR to study stress response in the lactic acid bacterium Oenococcus oeni. J. Microbiol. Methods 60:325-333.[CrossRef][Medline]
16
16. Djordjevic, D., M. Wiedmann, and L. A. McLandsborough. 2002. Microtiter plate assay for assessment of Listeria monocytogenes biofilm formation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:2950-2958.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17
17. Donlan, R. M., and J. W. Costerton. 2002. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15:167-193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18
18. Dunn, A. K., and E. V. Stabb. 2007. Beyond quorum sensing: the complexities of prokaryotic parliamentary procedures. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 387:391-398.[CrossRef][Medline]
19
19. Farber, J. M., and P. I. Peterkin. 1991. Listeria monocytogenes, a food-borne pathogen. Microbiol. Rev. 55:476-511.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20
20. Garmyn, D., T. Ferain, N. Bernard, P. Hols, and J. Delcour. 1995. Cloning, nucleotide sequence, and transcriptional analysis of the Pediococcus acidilactici L-(+)-lactate dehydrogenase gene. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:266-272.[Abstract]
21
21. Guzzo, J., M.-P. Jobin, F. Delmas, L.-C. Fortier, D. Garmyn, R. Tourdot-Marechal, B. Lee, and C. Divies. 2000. Regulation of stress response in Oenococcus oeni as a function of environmental changes and growth phase. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 55:27-31.[CrossRef][Medline]
22
22. Hall-Stoodley, L., and P. Stoodley. 2002. Developmental regulation of microbial biofilms. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 13:228-233.[CrossRef][Medline]
23
23. Harley, C. B., and R. P. Reynolds. 1987. Analysis of Escherichia coli promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 15:2343-2361.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24
24. Hebermehl, M., and G. Klug. 1998. Effect of oxygen on translation and posttranslational steps in expression of photosynthesis genes in Rhodobacter capsulatus. J. Bacteriol. 180:3983-3987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25
25. Homuth, G., A. Mogk, and W. Schumann. 1999. Post-transcriptional regulation of the Bacillus subtilis dnaK operon. Mol. Microbiol. 32:1183-1197.[CrossRef][Medline]
26
26. Horswill, A. R., P. Stoodley, P. S. Stewart, and M. R. Parsek. 2007. The effect of the chemical, biological, and physical environment on quorum sensing in structured microbial communities. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 387:371-380.[CrossRef][Medline]
27
27. Huber, B., K. Riedel, M. Hentzer, A. Heydorn, A. Gotschlich, M. Givskov, S. Molin, and L. Eberl. 2001. The cep quorum-sensing system of Burkholderia cepacia H111 controls biofilm formation and swarming motility. Microbiology 147:2517-2528.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28
28. Jefferson, K. K. 2004. What drives bacteria to produce a biofilm? FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 236:163-173.[Medline]
29
29. Ji, G., R. C. Beavis, and R. P. Novick. 1995. Cell density control of staphylococcal virulence mediated by an octapeptide pheromone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:12055-12059.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30
30. Kjelleberg, S., and S. Molin. 2002. Is there a role for quorum sensing signals in bacterial biofilms? Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 5:254-258.[CrossRef][Medline]
31
31. Kühn, K., A. Weihe, and T. Börner. 2005. Multiple promoters are a common feature of mitochondrial genes in Arabidopsis. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:337-346.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32
32. Lawrence, L., and A. Gilmour. 1995. Characterization of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from poultry products and from the poultry-processing environment by random amplification of polymorphic DNA and multilocus enzyme electrophoresis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:2139-2144.[Abstract]
33
33. Li, G., and S. Kathariou. 2003. An improved cloning vector for construction of gene replacements in Listeria monocytogenes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:3020-3023.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34
34. Mack, D., A. P. Davies, L. G. Harris, H. Rohde, M. A. Horstkotte, and J. K. M. Knobloch. 2007. Microbial interactions in Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 387:399-408.[CrossRef][Medline]
35
35. McNab, R., S. K. Ford, A. El-Sabaeny, B. Barbieri, G. S. Cook, and R. J. Lamont. 2003. LuxS-based signaling in Streptococcus gordonii: autoinducer 2 controls carbohydrate metabolism and biofilm formation with Porphyromonas gingivalis. J. Bacteriol. 185:274-284.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36
36. Merritt, J., F. Qi, S. D. Goodman, M. H. Anderson, and W. Shi. 2003. Mutation of luxS affects biofilm formation in Streptococcus mutans. Infect. Immun. 71:1972-1979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37
37. Mongkolsuk, S., W. Panmanee, S. Atichartpongkul, P. Vattanaviboon, W. Whangsuk, M. Fuangthong, W. Eiamphungporn, R. Sukchawalit, and S. Utamapongchai. 2002. The repressor for an organic peroxide-inducible operon is uniquely regulated at multiple levels. Mol. Microbiol. 44:793-802.[CrossRef][Medline]
38
38. Murakami, S. K., S. Masuda, E. A. Campbell, O. Muzzin, and S. A. Darst. 2002. Structural basis of transcription initiation: an RNA polymerase holoenzyme-DNA complex. Science 296:1285-1290.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39
39. Murray, E. G. D., R. A. Webb, and M. B. R. Swann. 1926. A disease of rabbit characterised by a large mononuclear leucocytosis, caused by a hitherto undescribed bacillus: Bacterium monocytogenes. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 29:407-439.[CrossRef]
40
40. Nilsson, P., S. Naureckiene, and B. Uhlin. 1996. Mutations affecting mRNA processing and fimbrial biogenesis in the Escherichia coli pap operon. J. Bacteriol. 178:683-690.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41
41. Novick, R. P., S. J. Projan, J. Kornblum, H. F. Ross, G. Ji, B. Kreiswirth, F. Vandenesch, and S. Moghazeh. 1995. The agr P2 operon: an autocatalytic sensory transduction system in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Gen. Genet. 248:446-458.[CrossRef][Medline]
42
42. Otto, M. 2004. Quorum-sensing control in Staphylococci-a target for antimicrobial drug therapy? FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 241:135-141.[CrossRef][Medline]
43
43. Phadtare, S., and K. Severinov. 2005. Extended –10 motif is critical for activity of the cspA promoter but does not contribute to low-temperature transcription. J. Bacteriol. 187:6584-6589.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44
44. Qin, X., K. V. Singh, G. M. Weinstock, and B. E. Murray. 2001. Characterization of fsr, a regulator controlling expression of gelatinase and serine protease in Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF. J. Bacteriol. 183:3372-3382.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45
45. Qin, X., K. V. Singh, G. M. Weinstock, and B. E. Murray. 2000. Effects of Enterococcus faecalis fsr genes on production of gelatinase and a serine protease and virulence. Infect. Immun. 68:2579-2586.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46
46. Sauer, K., A. K. Camper, G. D. Ehrlich, J. W. Costerton, and D. G. Davies. 2002. Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays multiple phenotypes during development as a biofilm. J. Bacteriol. 184:1140-1154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47
47. Silvaggi, J. M., J. B. Perkins, and R. Losick. 2005. Small untranslated RNA antitoxin in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 187:6641-6650.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48
48. Sturme, M. H. J., J. Nakayama, D. Molenaar, Y. Murakami, R. Kunugi, T. Fujii, E. E. Vaughan, M. Kleerebezem, and W. M. de Vos. 2005. An agr-like two-component regulatory system in Lactobacillus plantarum is involved in production of a novel cyclic peptide and regulation of adherence. J. Bacteriol. 187:5224-5235.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49
49. Vance, G., J. Fowler, G. Sakoulas, L. M. McIntyre, V. G. Meka, R. D. Arbeit, C. H. Cabell, M. E. Stryjewski, G. M. Eliopoulos, L. B. Reller, G. R. Corey, T. Jones, N. Lucindo, M. R. Yeaman, and A. S. Bayer. 2004. Persistent bacteremia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection is associated with agr dysfunction and low-level in vitro resistance to thrombin-induced platelet microbicidal protein. J. Infect. Dis. 190:1140-1149.[CrossRef][Medline]
50
50. Vogel, J., I. M. Axmann, H. Herzel, and W. R. Hess. 2003. Experimental and computational analysis of transcriptional start sites in the Cyanobacterium prochlorococcus MED4. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:2890-2899.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51
51. Vogel, J., V. Bartels, T. H. Tang, G. Churakov, J. G. Slagter-Jäger, A. Hüttenhofer, E. Gerhart, and H. Wagner. 2003. RNomics in Escherichia coli detects new sRNA species and indicates parallel transcriptional output in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:6435-6443.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52
52. Vuong, C., H. L. Saenz, F. Gotz, and M. Otto. 2000. Impact of the agr quorum-sensing system on adherence to polystyrene in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 182:1688-1693.[CrossRef][Medline]
53
53. Williams, T., S. Bauer, D. Beier, and M. Kuhn. 2005. Construction and characterization of Listeria monocytogenes mutants with in-frame deletions in the response regulator genes identified in the genome sequence. Infect. Immun. 73:3152-3159.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54
54. Xu, L., H. Li, C. Vuong, V. Vadyvaloo, J. Wang, Y. Yao, M. Otto, and Q. Gao. 2006. Role of the luxS quorum-sensing system in biofilm formation and virulence of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect. Immun. 74:488-496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55
55. Yarwood, J. M., D. J. Bartels, E. M. Volper, and E. P. Greenberg. 2004. Quorum sensing in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 186:1838-1850.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
56
56. Yarwood, J. M., J. K. McCormick, M. L. Paustian, V. Kapur, and P. M. Schlievert. 2002. Repression of the Staphylococcus aureus accessory gene regulator in serum and in vivo. J. Bacteriol. 184:1095-1101.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
57
57. Yarwood, J. M., and P. M. Schlievert. 2003. Quorum sensing in Staphylococcus infections. J. Clin. Investig. 112:1620-1625.[CrossRef][Medline]

---

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2007, p. 6125-6133, Vol. 73, No. 19
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.00608-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Ohtani, K., Yuan, Y., Hassan, S., Wang, R., Wang, Y., Shimizu, T. (2009). Virulence Gene Regulation by the agr System in Clostridium perfringens. J. Bacteriol. 191: 3919-3927 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rieu, A., Briandet, R., Habimana, O., Garmyn, D., Guzzo, J., Piveteau, P. (2008). Listeria monocytogenes EGD-e Biofilms: No Mushrooms but a Network of Knitted Chains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 4491-4497 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rieu, A. Articles by Guzzo, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rieu, A. Articles by Guzzo, J. Agricola Articles by Rieu, A. Articles by Guzzo, J.