Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 2007, p. 7427-7434, Vol. 73, No. 22
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.01101-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Department of Life System, Institute of Technology and Science, University of Tokushima, 2-1 Minamijosanjima-cho, Tokushima 770-8506, Japan,1 Analytical Research Center for Experimental Sciences, Saga University, 1 Honjo-machi, Saga 840-8502, Japan,2 Institute for Health Science, Tokushima Bunri University, Yamashiro-cho, Tokushima 770-8514, Japan,3 Catalysis Science Laboratory, Mitsui Chemicals, Inc., 1144, Togo, Mobara-shi, Chiba 297-0017, Japan,4 Microbial Genetics Division, Institute of Genetic Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan5
Received 17 May 2007/ Accepted 15 September 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
View larger version (7K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Sequential aldol condensations catalyzed by DERA. (Reprinted with permission from reference 6. Copyright 1994, American Chemical Society.)
|
In the present study, DERAs from two hyperthermophiles, the archaeon Pyrobaculum aerophilum and the bacterium Thermotoga maritima, were compared with DERAEco in terms of their capacity to catalyze aldol condensation. We found that both enzymes are highly resistant to acetaldehyde and exhibit much greater catalysis of sequential aldol condensation of three acetaldehydes than the E. coli enzyme, even at room temperature (25°C). The structure of the DERAEco has already been reported by Heine et al. (8, 9), and that of the T. maritima DERA (DERATma) is available in the Protein Data Bank. We therefore also determined the crystal structure of the P. aerophilum DERA (DERAPae) and then compared the architectures of the three enzymes and evaluated the structural features responsible for the extremely high stability of the hyperthermophilic enzymes and their robust propulsive force of sequential aldol condensation.
|
|
|---|
Cloning, protein expression, and purification.
The genes encoding DERATma (open reading frame TM1559) and DERAPae (open reading frame PAE1231) were amplified by PCR (the gene information is available at www.genome.jp/kegg) using the following sets of oligonucleotide primers: 5'-TATATCATATGATAGAGTACAGGATTGAG-3' and 5'-TTATGGATCCCTCAAC CTCCATATCTCTC-3' for DERATma and 5'-GCGGCCATATGATACATTTAGTA GACTACG-3' and 5'-TAATGGATCCCTATAGAAGAGCCTCTGGGG-3' for DERAPae. In each case, the forward primer introduced a unique NdeI restriction site that overlapped the 5' initiation codon, while the reverse primer introduced a unique BamHI restriction site proximal to the 3' end of the termination codon. Chromosomal DNA isolated as described previously (20) was used as the template. The amplified fragments were digested with NdeI and BamHI and ligated into the expression vector pET11a (Novagen) linearized with NdeI and BamHI, yielding pPAE for DERAPae and pTMA for DERATma.
To prepare recombinant DERAPae, the E. coli strain BL21(DE3) codon plus RIL (Stratagene) was transformed with pPAE, after which the transformants were cultivated at 37°C in a medium containing 12 g of tryptone, 24 g of yeast extract, 5 ml of glycerol, 12.5 g of K2HPO4, 3.8 g of KH2PO4, and 50 mg of ampicillin/liter until the optical density at 600 nm reached 0.6. Expression was induced by adding 1 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside to the medium, and cultivation was continued for an additional 3 h at 37°C. The cells were then harvested by centrifugation, suspended in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) and disrupted by sonication. After the lysate was centrifuged (15,000 x g for 20 min), the supernatant was heated for 20 min at 90°C and then clarified by centrifugation. This supernatant was then subjected to gel filtration on a Superdex 200 26/60 column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) containing 0.2 M NaCl, after which the resulting protein solution was dialyzed against 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0). Preparation of the recombinant DERATma was carried out using the same procedure, except pTMA was used as the expression plasmid.
The expression vector carrying DERAEco (the pECO:DERAEco gene was amplified by PCR and inserted into the EcoRI-HindIII site of pUC18) was kindly provided by Catalysis Science Laboratory, Mitsui Chemicals, Inc. (Chiba, Japan), and E. coli cells transformed with pECO were cultivated as described above. After disrupting the cells by sonication, the cell debris was removed by centrifugation, and nucleic acids were removed by addition of streptomycin sulfate to a final concentration of 1%, followed by centrifugation. The resultant supernatant was loaded onto a DEAE-Toyopearl column (Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan) equilibrated with 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0). After the column was washed with the same buffer, the enzyme was eluted with a linear gradient of 0 to 0.2 M NaCl in the same buffer. The active fractions were pooled, (NH4)2SO4 was added to the solution to 40% saturation, and the resulting solution was placed on a butyl-Toyopearl column (Tosoh) equilibrated with 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) supplemented with 40% (NH4)2SO4. After the column was washed with the same buffer, the enzyme was eluted with a linear gradient of 40 to 0% (NH4)2SO4 in the same buffer. The active fractions were collected, and the solution was subjected to gel filtration with a Superdex 200 26/60 column, as described above. The resulting protein solution was then dialyzed against 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0).
Enzyme assay and determination of protein concentration.
Assays for the DRP cleavage and aldol condensation were carried out at 25°C, due to the lability of aldehydes at higher temperatures. The DRP cleavage activity was determined by measuring the oxidation of NADH in a coupled assay using triose-phosphate isomerase and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. The assay mixture contained 100 mM buffer, 0.1 mM NADH, 0.4 mM DRP, 11 units of triose-phosphate isomerase (rabbit muscle), 4 units of glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (rabbit muscle), and the DERA preparation in a total volume of 1.00 ml. Imidazole-HCl (pH 6.5), sodium acetate (pH 6.0), and triethanolamine-HCl (pH 7.5) were used as the buffer for DERATma, DERAPae, and DERAEco, respectively. The change in absorbance of NADH was followed at 340 nm (
= 6.22 mM–1 cm–1). The Michaelis constants were determined with the nonlinear regression analysis of the data obtained from the initial rate of D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate formation at 25°C by using an enzyme kinetics module of SigmaPlot (Hulinks, Inc., Tokyo, Japan).
The protein concentration was determined using the Bradford method (2), with a standard assay kit from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA); bovine serum albumin served as the standard.
The aldol condensation reaction was analyzed using thin-layer chromatography (TLC) with catalog code PE-SIL-G/UV (Whatman, United Kingdom) TLC plates. The assay mixture for DRP production contained 100 mM buffer, 300 mM acetaldehyde, 50 mM glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, and the DERA preparation (0.5 µg) in a total volume of 50 µl. For the sequential aldol reaction mixture, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate was omitted from the assay mixture, and 23 µg of enzyme was used. Sodium acetate (pH 5.5), sodium acetate (pH 6.0), and imidazole-HCl (pH 6.5) were used as the buffer for the DRP synthesis of DERAPae, DERATma, and DERAEco, respectively. On the other hand, sodium acetate (pH 6.0), imidazole-HCl (pH 6.0), and imidazole-HCl (pH 7.0) were used as the buffer for the sequential aldol reaction of DERAPae, DERATma, and DERAEco, respectively. After incubation for an appropriate time at 25°C, the reaction was stopped by cooling on ice. Each solution was then passed through a centrifugal filter device (Microcon YM-30; Millipore, Tokyo, Japan) to remove protein, and an aliquot (2 µl) of the filtrate was subjected to TLC analysis. The developing systems for DRP and 2,4,6-trideoxy-D-erythro-hexapyranoside consisted of 1-butanol, acetic acid, and H2O at ratios of 4:2:3 (vol/vol/vol) and 4:1:1 (vol/vol/vol), respectively. The spots of the reaction products were localized with anisaldehyde reagent (5% [vol/vol] anisaldehyde, and 10% [vol/vol] H2SO4 in methanol).
The products of the sequential aldol reaction with acetaldehyde were analyzed by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The reaction system was similar to that described above, except the reaction mixture utilized 23 mg of enzyme in a 50-ml volume. The mixture was then stirred in the dark for 2 days at 25°C, after which the solution was passed through a centrifugal filter device (Amicon Ultra PL-30; Millipore). The filtrate was then lyophilized and further purified through two silica gel chromatography steps using dichloromethane-methanol (10:1) and ethyl acetate. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a JEOL JMS-AX500 spectrometer (400 MHz) using tetramethylsilane as the internal standard. Mass spectra were measured on a JEOL JMS-DX-303 mass spectrometer using the electron ionization method.
Stability and pH optimum.
To examine the effects of acetaldehyde on enzyme stability, the enzyme preparations in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (0.5 mg/ml; pH 8.0) containing 300 mM acetaldehyde were incubated at 25°C, after which the residual activity was determined at appropriate intervals by using the assay for DRP cleavage. Prior to analysis of the enzyme activity, the acetaldehyde was removed from the enzyme solution by using a centrifugal filter device (Microcon YM-10; Millipore); the sample was concentrated and then diluted to the original volume with 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0), and the cycle was repeated. To assess thermostability, the enzyme (0.5 mg/ml) was incubated for 10 min at different temperatures, after which the residual activities were assayed. To determine pH stability, the enzyme (0.5 mg/ml) was incubated for 30 min at 50°C in buffers of different pHs, after which the remaining activities were assayed. The buffers (500 mM) used were sodium acetate, potassium phosphate, Tris-HCl, glycine-NaOH, and Na2HPO3-NaOH for pH ranges of 3.5 to 6.0, 6.0 to 7.5, 7.5 to 8.5, 8.5 to 11.0, and 11.0 to 12.5, respectively. The buffers used to determine the optimal pH of the enzyme were sodium acetate (0.1 M), imidazole-HCl (0.1 M), triethanolamine-HCl (0.1 M), and glycine-NaOH (0.1 M) for pH ranges of 5.0 to 6.0, 6.0 to 7.5, 7.5 to 8.5, and 8.5 to 11.0, respectively. The DRP cleavage assay was used.
The optimal pH for the aldol condensation was determined using TLC analysis. After localization of the product spots, the TLC plate was scanned, and the relative ratios of the peak areas were determined using ImageJ software (rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/).
Crystallization and data collection.
Crystallization conditions were screened using Wizard 1 and 2 (Emerald Biostructure). Crystals of DERAPae were obtained using the hanging drop vapor diffusion method, in which 2 µl of 14 mg/ml protein was mixed with an equal volume of mother liquor, which consisted of 20% (wt/vol) polyethylene glycol 1000, 0.2 M zinc acetate, and 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH 4.5). The crystals were grown at 20°C for 3 days and were found to belong to the hexagonal space group P63, with unit cell parameters of a = b = 84.5 Å and c = 112.6 Å, and to diffract to 2.0 Å. We collected the diffraction data on an R-AXIS VII imaging plate detector using a rotating copper anode in-house generator (MicroMax007, Rigaku, Japan) operating at 40 kV and 20 mA. All measurements were carried out on crystals cryoprotected with 30% (wt/vol) trehalose and cooled to 100 K in a stream of nitrogen gas. The data were processed using HKL2000 (16).
Phasing and refinement.
Heavy-atom derivatives were prepared by soaking the crystals in a reservoir solution containing 1 mM Hg-acetate or 1 mM K2Pt(SCN)6 (Hampton Research) for 7 h. Phase calculation was carried out by the multiple-isomorphous-replacement-with-an-anomalous-scattering (MIRAS) method by using SOLVE software (22). The resultant MIRAS map at 2.0 Å was subjected to maximum-likelihood density modification, followed by autotracing using RESOLVE (22). The model was built using XtalView (13), and refinement to a resolution of 2.0 Å was carried out using Refmac5 (14) and CNS (3) software. Then, after several cycles of inspection of the 2Fo-Fc and Fo-Fc density maps were carried out, the model was rebuilt. The Rcryst and Rfree values of the final model were 20.6% and 24.1%, respectively (Table 1). The final structure exhibited good geometry without Ramachandran outliers. Molecular graphics figures were created using PyMOL (pymol.sourceforge.net/).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. X-ray data collection and refinement statistics
|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Optimal pH levels for DRP cleavage and thermal/pH stability. (A) The DRP cleavage assay was performed at various pH levels at 25°C. Filled circles, DERAPae; open circles, DERATma; open squares, DERAEco. (B) After incubation for 10 min at the indicated temperatures, the remaining activity was assayed. Filled circles, DERAPae; open circles, DERATma; open squares, DERAEco. (C) The enzyme was incubated for 30 min at 50°C in buffers of various pH levels, after which the remaining activity was assayed. Filled squares, DERAPae; open squares, DERATma; filled circles, DERAEco.
|
![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. TLC analysis of the products by aldol condensation. (A) DRP synthesis. Lane 1, DRP standard; lane 2, reaction mixture with DERAEco; lane 3, reaction mixture with DERAPae; lane 4, reaction mixture with DERATma. (B) Sequential aldol reaction with acetaldehyde. Lane 1, reaction mixture with DERAEco; lane 2, reaction mixture with DERAPae; lane 3, reaction mixture with DERATma. The product was identified as 2,4,6-trideoxy-D-erythro-hexapyranoside, using 1H NMR, as described in Materials and Methods.
|
Effects of acetaldehyde on enzyme stability.
Both of the hyperthermophilic DERAs were highly resistant to acetaldehyde. The DERAPae and DERATma retained 53% and 46% of their DRP cleavage activity, respectively, after exposure for 20 h to 300 mM acetaldehyde at 25°C (Fig. 4). On the other hand, the DERAEco is almost completely inactivated after exposure for 2 h under the same conditions (Fig. 4). Although the concentration of acetaldehyde in the hyperthermophilic DERA's reactions after 20 h is likely much less than 300 mM because of large amount of catalysis occurring with this substrate, a noteworthy difference was observed in stability between the two hyperthermophilic proteins and the mesophilic ortholog.
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Effects of acetaldehyde on enzyme stability. The enzyme was incubated at 25°C in the presence of 300 mM acetaldehyde, and the DRP cleavage activity was assayed at appropriate intervals. Filled circles, DERAEco. Filled squares, DERAPae; filled triangles, DERATma.
|
/β)8-barrel carrying two additional helical segments (Fig. 5) in which
1 helix precedes the first β strand, while
7 helix protrudes away from the barrel. The strong density of a metal ion was observed near the side chains of Asp211 and His3*. Because the crystals were obtained with mother liquor containing zinc acetate, we modeled the density as a zinc ion. Within the crystal structure, we also found one disulfide bond formed between Cys35 (β2) and Cys54 (β3) (Fig. 5).
![]() View larger version (41K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Overall structure of the DERAPae monomer. The multicolored drawing shows the N terminus in blue and the C terminus in red. The helices and β strands are numbered from the N terminus. The zinc ion (Zn) is shown in light blue.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Hydrophobic and ionic residues involved in interactions between A and B subunits
|
|
|
|---|
Both of the hyperthermophilic enzymes showed much less DRP synthetic activity than DERAEco at 25°C, as with DRP cleavage reaction. This is not surprising in view of the extremely high growth temperature (
80°C) of hyperthermophiles. By contrast, DERATma and DERAPae exhibit much greater catalysis of sequential aldol condensation with three molecules of acetaldehyde than DERAEco, even at a low temperature. In addition, both of the enzymes were highly resistant to high concentration of acetaldehyde and retained about 50% of their initial activities after 20 h of exposure to 300 mM acetaldehyde at 25°C, whereas the DERAEco is almost completely inactivated after 2 h of exposure under the same conditions. This suggests that the higher stability of the hyperthermophilic DERAs against high concentrations of acetaldehyde might lead to their higher capacity for the production of 2,4,6-trideoxy-D-erythro-hexapyranoside, though the reason for their extremely high sequential condensation activity even at a low temperature like 25°C remains to be explained.
The structure of DERAEco (Protein Data Bank code 1JCL) has already been reported (8, 9), and that of DERATma (Protein Data Bank code 1O0Y) has been deposited in the Protein Data Bank by the Joint Center for Structural Genomics. As shown in Fig. 6, the main chain coordinates of the DERAPae and DERATma monomers were quite similar to that of DERAEco. After superposition of the conserved residues within the β-barrel core, the root-mean-square deviations (RMSD) for the C-
atoms were 0.66 Å (residues Asp6, Cys35, Asp84, Lys117, Lys146, Ser148-Gly150, Lys188, Gly191-Ile193, Arg216, Gly218, and Ser220-Thr221) for DERAPae and 0.47 Å (Cys65, Asp117, Lys150, Lys179-Gly183, Lys208, Gly211-Ile213, Arg229, Gly231, and Ser233-Ser234) for DERATma. However, we noted three clear differences among the three enzymes: the
7 helix seen in DERAPae is present in neither DERATma nor DERAEco; the DERATma exhibits additional 30- to 40-amino-acid sequences in the N-terminal region (including the His-tagged sequence) compared with the two other enzymes and contains an additional long arm that includes an N-terminal
helix (Fig. 6); and the DERAPae contains a disulfide bond between Cys35 and Cys54 (Fig. 5). To examine the role of the disulfide bond, we prepared a C54S mutant of DERAPae (data not shown). The mutant showed lower stability than the wild type, and the activity was markedly reduced when the mutant enzyme was heated for 10 min at 100°C, suggesting the positive contribution of the disulfide bond for the greater stability of DERAPae. The details about the mutant enzyme will be described elsewhere.
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Structural comparison of DERA monomers. Structures of the DERAPae (A) and DERATma (B) monomers (green) superimposed on the DERAEco monomer (yellow) are shown. The N-terminal helix of DERATma is indicated by an arrow. The DRP binding site of the hyperthermophilic DERAs has been predicted based on their superposition with DERAEco in complex with DRP. The DRP molecule is represented by a stick model (red).
|
Recent studies of the structures of hyperthermophilic proteins have shown that the increased number of ion pairs and the enriched formation of ion pair networks are responsible mainly for the higher thermostability (10, 24). However, there are no significant differences in the numbers of total ion pairs in the intrasubunits among the three enzymes. It is thought that, in general, a smaller ASA is another feature that serves to increase protein thermostability (4). The total ASA of the DERAEco monomer is similar to those of DERAPae and DERATma. In addition, no significant differences have been detected in the total hydrophobic areas among the three enzymes.
In solution, DERAEco is reported to exist as either a monomer or a dimer (21). In a crystal form, the enzyme forms a dimeric structure with a relatively small subunit interface (Fig. 7). The ASA of the interface has been estimated to be 444 to 448 Å2 (9), with a single hydrogen bond and two salt bridges present between the two subunits. Thus, the idea that the catalytic activity of this enzyme is dependent on its dimerization is not well supported by the structural evidence (9). The dimeric structure of DERAPae is similar to that of DERATma, but it is clearly different from that of DERAEco (Fig. 7). The ASAs of the dimer interfaces in DERAPae (1,463 Å2) and DERATma (1,445 Å2) were much larger than that of DERAEco. The hydrophobic interactions were observed mainly at the interfaces. The hydrophobic interaction is especially striking on the loops containing Phe59, Pro60, Phe61, and Phe151 in DERAPae and on the loops containing Phe91, Pro92, Leu93, and Phe184 in DERATma. These residues were buried in a large hydrophobic cluster between the two subunits in each enzyme. Only two or three salt bridges were observed between the subunits in the two enzymes (Table 2). These results suggest that an increase in intersubunit hydrophobic interactions formed by the unique dimeric structure is responsible for the extremely high stability of the two hyperthermophilic DERAs. Such interactions are not observed within the structure of DERAEco.
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Arrangement of the two DERA subunits in crystal forms. Structures of the DERAEco (A), DERAPae (B), and DERATma (C) dimers are shown. The lower row is the model viewed down the twofold axis.
|
![]() View larger version (41K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Stereographic close-up of the hydrophobic cluster at the scaffold of key Lys residues. The structures of DERAPae (purple) and DERATma (green) were superimposed on that of DERAEco (yellow). The DRP molecule is shown as a stick model in magenta. Nitrogen, oxygen, and phosphorus atoms are shown in blue, red, and orange, respectively.
|
We thank Ikuko Shimoya-Kawakami for kind technical assistance.
Published ahead of print on 28 September 2007. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»