Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2007, p. 1049-1053, Vol. 73, No. 4
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.01158-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, Nakano, Tokyo 164-8639, Japan,1 Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Seven Bungalows, Versova, Mumbai 400 061, India2
Received 19 May 2006/ Accepted 1 December 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Differences in buoyant densities can be used to separate particles, and the density-dependent cell sorting (DDCS) method has been applied to laboratory-cultured bacteria. For instance, cells in different physiological states have been successfully separated using this approach (see, e.g., references 9, 12, and 13), because physiological changes alter cellular components and the subsequent buoyant density. The DDCS method has been applied mostly to pure cultures, however, and only once to natural assemblages. To our knowledge, only one study has used DDCS to separate active from nonactive cells in natural seawater after short-term incubation with 2-(4-iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-phenyl-2H-tetrazolium chloride (INT) (22); the deposition of formazan on active cells increased their density, which made it possible to separate cells using the DDCS method.
The buoyant density of natural bacterial communities may have ecological implications when the behavior of bacteria is considered at a microscale. Natural bacterial communities are composed of physiologically and taxonomically different groups of cells, but it is not clear how these two factors affect the apparent buoyant density of each group. Because the nutrient level in natural seawater is generally low and relatively constant (about 1 mg of C liter1) (14), there should be no or very few cells in a physiological state corresponding to the exponential-growth phase achieved in the laboratory. In natural bacterial assemblages, the variation of physiological states may not be as large as that seen in batch culture, which contains cells in lag, exponential, and stationary phases. Therefore, we assumed that unique buoyant densities may be detectable among at least some phylogenetic groups and that those cells can be separated using the DDCS method.
In this study, we first concentrated a natural bacterial assemblage in order to collect sufficient numbers of cells. They were separated into three fractions using DDCS, and the community structure in each fraction was clarified by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The cells of Archaea tended to appear in the high-density fraction, whereas those of Cytophaga-Flavobacterium-Bacteroides (CFB) were in the low-density fraction. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the buoyant density of natural marine bacteria.
|
|
|---|
Three subsamples were taken from the concentrate and treated in parallel. Each subsample was fractionated using DDCS according to the method of Nishino et al. (13), with slight modifications. In brief, we used a Percoll (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) gradient working solution containing 61 to 63% Percoll, 10% 4 M NaCl, 10% 10x phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4), and 17 to 19% distilled water. Density marker beads (Amersham Biosciences) were added to one tube to measure the density of the working solution with a density gradient. One milliliter of sample was layered on top of 9 ml of the working solution, followed by ultracentrifugation for 20 min at 50,512 x g and 4°C with an SW40 Ti rotor (Beckman, CA) in a Beckman Optima XL-90 centrifuge (13). After ultracentrifugation, the samples were divided into three fractions (top, middle, and bottom) using a Piston Gradient Fractionator (Biocomp, Fredericton, Canada). The three fractions contained particles for which the buoyant densities were <1.064, 1.064 to 1.074, and >1.074 g cm3, respectively.
Each fraction was diluted with autoclaved, 0.2-µm-filtered artificial seawater and fixed with paraformaldehyde (final concentration, 2%). After staining with DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole), total cell counts were obtained by epifluorescence microscopy (BH-2; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) (15). For each sample, at least 20 fields and more than 400 cells were counted.
Each fractionated sample was filtered through Isopore polycarbonate filters (diameter, 25 mm; pore size, 0.2 µm; type GTTP 02500; Millipore, Eschborn, Germany) by applying a vacuum of <100 kPa. The filters and samples were stored below 20°C until treatment. Cy3-labeled oligonucleotides were purchased from QIAGEN (Tokyo, Japan). The probe names, target positions, sequences, and references are given in Table 1. Probes BET42a and GAM42a were used with competitor oligonucleotides (11). Each filter was cut into eight sections, placed on glass slides covered with Parafilm (American National Can, Chicago, IL), and covered with 30 µl of hybridization solution containing 29.4 µl of hybridization buffer (Table 2) and 0.6 µl of 250-ng µl1 Cy3-labeled oligonucleotide probe. After incubation at 46°C for 90 min in a moist chamber (4), the filters were transferred to a vial containing 20 ml of prewarmed (48°C) washing solution (Table 2) and incubated at 48°C for 15 min (4). The filter sections were dried on Toyo filter paper (Advantec), placed on Parafilm, and covered with 50 µl of DAPI solution (1 µg ml1 in distilled water run through a 0.2-µm-pore-size filter) for 5 min at room temperature in the dark. Next, they were gently washed in 50 ml of 0.2-µm-filtered distilled water, dried on Toyo filter paper, and mounted on glass slides with Citifluor AF1 (Citifluor Ltd., Canterbury, United Kingdom) (4). After hybridization, the bacteria on the filter sections were enumerated by epifluorescence microscopy (BH-2; Olympus) with a Cy3 filter set. For each sample and probe, at least 20 fields and more than 400 cells were counted. All counts were corrected by subtracting the count obtained with the NON338 probe (negative control).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Oligonucleotide probes used in this study
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Composition of hybridization and wash buffers used in this study
|
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Concentration efficiencies of DAPI-positive and probe-specific cells in each sample
|
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Relative proportions of bacteria stained with DAPI or FISH probes. Ju, July; O, October; Ja, January; A, April.
|
|
|
|---|
Cell concentration.
For DDCS, 1 ml of sample was loaded on top of the working solution. To obtain a sufficient number of cells for FISH with different types of probes, it was necessary to concentrate the cells prior to the procedures. After a preliminary investigation (data not shown), we decided to obtain a suspension with approximately 108 cells ml1, which requires 100- to 200-fold concentration of natural seawater samples. There have been only a few reports of the concentration of natural aquatic bacteria. The concentration efficiency of the present method was about 90%, which is comparable to that for cultured Escherichia coli cells using the tangential flow system (20). We found little difference in concentration efficiencies between probe-specific groups (mean, 87%; SD, 11%; CV, 12%; n = 18), indicating that there was little bias during the concentration process (Table 3). In this study, after samples were divided by DDCS, the FISH method was used, because it gives the most reliable quantitative data among culture-independent techniques. If another method requiring fewer cells were applied, however, the cell concentration step might not be necessary.
Application of DDCS to a natural marine bacterial assemblage.
In previous studies, DDCS was applied exclusively to cultured bacterial cells under experimental conditions (see, e.g., references 9, 12, and 13). The application of DDCS to a natural bacterial population by using INT was specifically intended to increase the density of actively respiring bacteria (22); thus, it was not based on the differences in buoyant densities inherent to natural communities. When applied to natural assemblages, the DDCS method should separate the cells solely on the basis of their buoyant densities and not on the basis of other factors such as cell size or clumping. If the sedimentation equilibrium had not been established under the present ultracentrifugation condition, those factors might have affected the apparent results. Assuming that the cell radius is 0.3 µm and the buoyant density is 1.087 g cm3, the cell may move 163 mm under the present ultracentrifugation condition. Since density marker beads with a density of 1.087 g cm3 locate at a depth of 65 mm from the surface in the test tube, the equilibrium should be established within the ultracentrifugation time period. The effect of the cell shape also does not cause a problem, because a prolate ellipsoid with an axial ratio of 20 may move 82 mm in our centrifugation condition. Therefore, factors such as cell size, morphology, and clumping should hardly affect the present results. Microscopic observation supports this idea.
Using our present protocol, about 61% of the natural marine bacterial assemblage was recovered; part of the remaining 39% may have undergone cellular lysis during the procedure. In order to separate cells according to their original buoyant densities, cells were fixed after the DDCS step. Some ghost cells, if any existed, might not be able to withstand ultracentrifugation with Percoll. Another possibility is that there were some "heavy bacteria" in our samples. After ultracentrifugation with Percoll, condensed materials remained in the bottom of the centrifugation tube. Because we could not recover cells from these materials, the possible presence of heavy bacteria remains to be investigated. Such heavy bacterial cells may be associated with condensed elements or metals (5).
Buoyant density of marine Archaea and Eubacteria.
Using DDCS, we revealed that free-living cells belonging to CFB had lower buoyant densities (distributed in the top fractions) than did free-living cells of Archaea (bottom fraction) (Fig. 1). This finding coincides with the vertical distribution of these groups in natural seawater. CFB bacteria tend to live near the surface, especially in association with phytoplankton (8), whereas Archaea comprise half or more of the total bacteria in the deep ocean, especially below 1,000 m (7, 19). It is not clear which cellular characteristics account for this difference in buoyant density, although the membranes of archaeal cells are typically composed of archaeol and caldarchaeol, whereas the membranes of eubacterial cells are ester lipid. Thus, biochemical investigations may clarify the factors involved in buoyant density. We were unable to find trends in the buoyant densities of other phylogenetic groups in this study, perhaps because they are mixtures of physiologically different cells and/or because each group comprises subgroups possessing a wide range of unique densities.
Calculation of bacterial sedimentation velocity.
Because this work provides the first quantitative data on the buoyant density of marine bacterial communities, we also estimated their sedimentation velocity using Stokes' law (6). We assumed the following for marine bacteria and seawater: the cell is a sphere with a radius of 0.3 µm; the buoyant densities of low-, middle-, and high-density bacteria and seawater are 1.047, 1.067, 1.087, and 1.027 g cm3, respectively; and the temperature of the seawater is 5°C. Based on these assumptions, the sedimentation velocities of low-, middle-, and high-density bacteria are about 10, 20, and 30 µm h1, respectively. These values increase by 1.5 times at 20°C.
This sedimentation velocity value is small, and marine bacteria may not actually be able to move through water masses or currents with physicochemical factors and densities different from those assumed in our calculation. However, a sedimentation velocity of about 10 to 30 µm h1 would indicate that the cells can be affected by the downward force of gravity, and this may result in their vertical movements. Recent works have indicated that there is a heterogeneous distribution of bacterial cells at a microscale (2, 16, 17, 18). Bacterial sedimentation velocity depending on buoyant density may contribute to such distribution patterns and may offer new insight into this heterogeneity. Bacterial variability at this scale, such as microzones or hot spots, will lead to localized biogeochemical cycling (18). Therefore, the buoyant density of marine bacteria is important in considering the distribution at such scales.
In conclusion, DDCS was applied to natural marine bacterial assemblages, and the community structure in each fraction was examined by FISH. CFB bacteria tended to have low densities, whereas Archaea tended to have high densities. The apparent sedimentation velocity calculated according to Stokes' law was roughly 10 to 30 µm h1. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the fractionation of marine bacteria based on their buoyant densities. We are currently investigating the relationship between buoyant density and bacterial functions in natural seawater.
This work was partly supported by the Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant from The Japan Science Society and by a Research Project Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) (18201003), funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan.
Published ahead of print on 8 December 2006. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»