Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2007, p. 1388-1392, Vol. 73, No. 4
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.01921-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Metaproteomics Approach To Study the Functionality of the Microbiota in the Human Infant Gastrointestinal Tract
Eline S. Klaassens,*
Willem M. de Vos, and
Elaine E. Vaughan
Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, 6703 CT Wageningen, The Netherlands
Received 11 August 2006/
Accepted 3 December 2006

ABSTRACT
A metaproteomics approach comprising two-dimensional gel electrophoresis
and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight
(mass spectrometry) was applied to the largely uncultured infant
fecal microbiota for the first time. The fecal microbial metaproteome
profiles changed over time, and one protein spot contained a
peptide sequence that showed high similarity to those of bifidobacterial
transaldolases.

INTRODUCTION
The human gastrointestinal tract is rapidly colonized during
the first days of life by microbes (
4,
10) which ultimately
contribute significantly to host nutrition and immunity among
other beneficial effects (
1,
8). Analysis of 16S ribosomal DNA
clone libraries revealed numerous undescribed species in intestinal
samples, emphasizing the importance of techniques that bypass
cultivation of microbiota (
3,
4,
15,
17,
20) such as proteomics.
So far there have been two reports of the use of metaproteomics
to characterize complex bacterial ecosystems, illustrating the
feasibility of this approach in analyzing complex ecosystems
(
12,
19). In the present study we investigated the potential
use of metaproteomics for characterization of the human fecal
microbiota.

Dynamics of the intestinal microbiota.
The relatively simple infant fecal ecosystem was chosen for
this study as it is dominated by bifidobacteria, which were
used in this study to optimize the protein isolation and two-dimensional
(2D) gel procedures (data not shown). Informed consent was obtained
from parents for use of the fecal samples of their infants.
Infant fecal samples containing high bifidobacterial content
were selected by bifidobacterium-specific fluorescent in situ
hybridization (
6,
22). Infants A (8 days old) and B (117 days
old) harbored 45% and 63% bifidobacteria in the total microbiota,
respectively. PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE)
(
14,
21,
23) of the 16S rRNA gene was performed to monitor the
total bacterial community (Fig.
1). The profiles were relatively
simple (Fig.
1) (4), as expected, and the predominance of bifidobacteria
was supported by the presence of abundant 16S rRNA gene amplicons
that comigrated with the control
Bifidobacterium longum strain
and was confirmed by sequencing (
14).

Metaproteome production of infant fecal microbiota.
Fecal samples were collected from the infants prior to weaning:
for infant A, at days 8, 24, and 41, and for infant B, at days
103, 117, and 144. Microbial cells were released from the feces
and washed as previously described (
5,
22). The bead beating
method was confirmed to be applicable for protein extraction
of infant fecal microbiota containing bifidobacteria (data not
shown), as expected from previous systematic studies (
5,
14,
20,
23,
24). Total soluble protein was obtained by three treatments
of 45 s of bead beating (FastPrep; Qbiogene), interspersed by
1 min on ice, in 500-µl isoelectric focusing (IEF) buffer
(Fluka, Switzerland) (10 M urea) containing 2% CHAPS (3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate)
(Roche, Switzerland), 0.65 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) (Sigma, Switzerland),
0.2% Biolytes 3/10 (Bio-Rad), Pefabloc Sc (Fluka), and glass
beads (Sigma) (

0.1 mm). Protein concentrations were determined
using a 2-D Quant kit (Amersham Biosciences). Each protein sample
(100 µg) was loaded onto 11-cm immobilized pH gradient
(IPG) ReadyStrips (Bio-Rad) (pH 4 to 7) and rehydrated for 12
h. IEF was carried out for 98,000 Vh (Protean IEF; Bio-Rad).
Reduction and alkylation of proteins were performed prior to
electrophoresis in the second dimension by incubating for 10
min in 6 M Urea-0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.8)-2% (wt/vol) sodium dodecyl
sulfate (SDS) with 130 mM DTT followed by a 10 min incubation
in the presence of 216 mM iodoacetamide (instead of DTT). The
IPG strip was positioned on an SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis
gel (Criterion gel, Bio-Rad) (12.5% polyacrylamide) with 1%
low melting agarose in 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8). Electrophoresis
was run at 100 V and 30 W. Silver staining was performed as
described previously (
16). Protein maps were scanned with a
GS-800 densitometer (Bio-Rad) and analyzed with PDQuest software
(Bio-Rad). Triplicate 2D gels for each sample were grouped.
For each infant, three groups, each representing one time point
in life, were compared using the quantitative function within
PDQuest software. The mean coefficient of variation (CV) (standard
deviation/mean
x 100) is a quantitative index for variation
of quantities among matched spots and was computed for gel-to-gel
variations within each replicate group. More than 200 protein
spots were visualized on each gel. A comparison of gels of infant
A revealed changes in number and intensities of protein spots
during the 33 days, although the patterns remained similar (Fig.
2A to C). In order to clearly demonstrate the changes a section
of the gel corresponding to each time point was enlarged (Fig.
3). Comparisons of differential protein production values with
percent CV values for various time points for the marked spots
are illustrated with bar graphs (Fig.
3C). The metaproteome
profiles of infant A (Fig.
2A to C) were different from those
of infant B (see, e.g., Fig.
2D) in accordance with the uniqueness
of each individual's microbiota (
20), as was also observed in
the PCR-DGGE profiles obtained as described above.

Identification of proteins.
A total of 55 protein spots were excised from the infant A 2D
gel at day 41 (Fig.
3A). Peptides were extracted after tryptic
digestion and analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time
of flight (mass spectrometry) [MALDI-TOF (MS)] (
2) (Applied
Biosystems 4700 proteomics analyzer; Technology Facility, Department
of Biology, The University of York, York, United Kingdom), which
provided a catalogue of 21 good mass peptide fingerprints. Peptide
sequences were searched using BLASTP, with the default settings
of the "Search for short, nearly exact matches" function, as
well as MS-Pattern in Protein Prospector 4.0.5 (The University
of California). As expected, the peptides' mass spectra showed
low similarity to those of database entries and no similarities
to those of human proteins. The mean differential protein amounts
of the 21 spots with clean signals for days 8, 24, and 41 are
indicated in Fig.
3A and presented in Table
1. MALDI-TOF (MS)
of spots 1, 2, 7, and 11 was performed for de novo peptide sequencing
(Fig.
3B), which resulted in determination of 11 N-terminal
sequences that shared similarity to those of bacterial proteins,
a viral protein, and four eukaryal proteins, but the collective
sequences were not significantly similar to any previously reported.
One complete peptide fragment (ELAEATDFVDGR) of protein spot
4 gave a result showing high-level database matches of 91% identity
(i.e., one mismatch) with the
Bifidobacterium infantis and
B. longum NCC2705 transaldolases and 83% identity with the DJO10A
transaldolase. Production for this protein spot was relatively
high at day 8 but increased approximately 10-fold and 6-fold
at days 24 and 41, respectively, possibly due to the increase
in numbers and activity of bifidobacteria in the infants' microbiota,
based on PCR-DGGE (Table
1 and Fig.
1). The data obtained for
the digestion sites of trypsin and the theoretical pI (4.87)
and molecular mass (39.6 kDa) of the
B. infantis transaldolase
protein agreed with the position of the protein spot in the
2D gel (Fig.
3A). This transaldolase gene is a common target
for PCR used to detect and enumerate bifidobacteria (
13). Transaldolase
was identified in a proteomic study by Vitali et al. (
18) of
B. infantis B107, where it represented, together with nine other
proteins, the most abundant portion of the proteome. The dominance
of the (tentatively identified) bifidobacterial transaldolase
protein in the feces of a newborn infant may explain its detection
by a metaproteomics approach.

Perspectives.
For the first time, reproducible 2D gels, extraction of proteins,
and tentative identification using MALDI-TOF (MS) demonstrated
the applicability of the proteomics approach for the complex
intestinal ecosystem. Currently insufficient microbiome sequence
information confounds identification of the proteins, but ongoing
metagenomic library analysis will enable meaningful identification
in time (
7,
9,
11). Furthermore, peptide mass fingerprints from
sequence data will be sufficient to produce more statistically
valid database matches, as was recently demonstrated by Ram
et al. (
12), who matched 6,000 peptide fragments to DNA sequences
of an accompanying metagenomic library from a low-complexity
natural microbial biofilm. Metaproteomics approaches may become
a useful tool to monitor the functional products of the microbiota
in feces over time as affected by dietary intervention, length
life, health, and disease.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers and peptide sequences.
The bifidobacterial nucleotide sequences of partial 16S rRNA
genes have been deposited in the GenBank database under accession
no. DQ323457, DQ323458, and DQ323459; the 11 peptide sequences
are DLAVALSENKR, ATNSELMHVGVSR, ELAEATDFVDGR, and PSSKVGSGSSGAGALK
(for spot 1), DVAPDLALMHTKLSR (for spot 2), ADNFEGDDR and TAFTGYETLR
(for spot 7), and KTGPKLFAADEALK, HYGLASDALANGGCVDSVSDSPA, APMVALSELER,
and TANSELLEAELAR (for spot 11).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs
through the Innovation Oriental Research Program on Genomics
(IOP Genomics: IGE01016).

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Hesselink van Suchtelenweg 4, 6703 CT Wageningen, The Netherlands. Phone: 31 317 483486. Fax: 31 317 483829. E-mail:
Eline.klaassens{at}wur.nl.

Published ahead of print on 8 December 2006. 

REFERENCES
1 - Bäckhed, F., R. E. Ley, J. L. Sonnenburg, D. A. Peterson, and J. I. Gordon. 2005. Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Science 307:1915-1920.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Curwen, R. S., P. D. Ashton, D. A. Johnston, and R. A. Wilson. 2004. The Schistosoma mansoni soluble proteome: a comparison across four life-cycle stages. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 138:57-66.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Eckburg, P. B., E. M. Bik, C. N. Bernstein, E. Purdom, L. Dethlefsen, M. Sargent, S. R. Gill, K. E. Nelson, and D. A. Relman. 2005. Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science 308:1635-1638.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Favier, C. F., E. E. Vaughan, W. M. de Vos, and A. D. L. Akkermans. 2002. Molecular monitoring of succession of bacterial communities in human neonates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:219-226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Fitzsimons, N. A., A. D. L. Akkermans, W. M. de Vos, and E. E. Vaughan. 2003. Bacterial gene expression detected in human faeces by reverse transcription-PCR. J. Microbiol. Methods 55:133-140.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - Franks, A. H., H. J. M. Harmsen, G. C. Raangs, G. J. Jansen, F. Schut, and G. W. Welling. 1998. Variations of bacterial populations in human feces measured by fluorescent in situ hybridization with group-specific 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:3336-3345.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Gill, S. R., M. Pop, R. T. DeBoy, P. B. Eckburg, P. J. Turnbaugh, B. S. Samuel, J. I. Gordon, D. A. Relman, C. M. Fraser-Liggett, and K. E. Nelson. 2006. Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science 312:1355-1359.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Hooper, L. V., T. Midtvedt, and J. I. Gordon. 2002. How host-microbial interactions shape the nutrient environment of the mammalian intestine. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 22:283-307.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 - Ley, R. E., D. A. Peterson, and J. I. Gordon. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary forces shaping microbial diversity in the human intestine. Cell 124:837.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Mackie, R. I., A. Sghir, and H. R. Gaskins. 1999. Developmental microbial ecology of the neonatal gastrointestinal tract. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 69:S1035-S1045.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Manichanh, C., L. Rigottier-Gois, E. Bonnaud, K. Gloux, E. Pelletier, L. Frangeul, R. Nalin, C. Jarrin, P. Chardon, P. Marteau, J. Roca, and J. Dore. 2006. Reduced diversity of faecal microbiota in Crohn's disease revealed by a metagenomic approach. Gut 55:205-211.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Ram, R. J., N. C. VerBerkmoes, M. P. Thelen, G. W. Tyson, B. J. Baker, R. C. Blake, I. I., M. Shah, R. L. Hettich, and J. F. Banfield. 2005. Community proteomics of a natural microbial biofilm. Science 308:1915-1920.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Requena, T., J. Burton, T. Matsuki, K. Munro, M. Simon, R. Tanaka, K. Watanabe, and G. W. Tannock. 2002. Identification, detection, and enumeration of human Bifidobacterium species by PCR targeting the transaldolase gene. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:2420-2427.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Satokari, R. M., E. E. Vaughan, A. D. L. Akkermans, M. Saarela, and W. M. de Vos. 2001. Bifidobacterial diversity in human feces detected by genus-specific PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:504-513.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Satokari, R. M., E. E. Vaughan, H. Smidt, M. Saarela, J. Mättö, and M. de Vos. 2003. Molecular approaches for the detection and identification of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli in the human gastrointestinal tract. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 26:572-584.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 - Shevchenko, A., M. Wilm, O. Vorm, and M. Mann. 1996. Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins from silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Chem. 68:850-858.[Medline]
17 - Suau, A., R. Bonnet, M. Sutren, J. Godon, G. R. Gibson, M. D. Collins, and J. Dore. 1999. Direct analysis of genes encoding 16S rRNA from complex communities reveals many novel molecular species within the human gut. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:4799-4807.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18 - Vitali, B., V. Wasinger, P. Brigidi, and M. Guilhaus. 2005. A proteomic view of Bifidobacterium infantis generated by multi-dimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Proteomics 5:1859-1867.[CrossRef][Medline]
19 - Wilmes, P., and P. L. Bond. 2004. The application of two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and downstream analyses to a mixed community of prokaryotic microorganisms. Environ. Microbiol. 6:911-920.[CrossRef][Medline]
20 - Zoetendal, E. G., A. D. L. Akkermans, and W. M. de Vos. 1998. Temperature gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of 16S rRNA from human fecal samples reveals stable and host-specific communities of active bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:3854-3859.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21 - Zoetendal, E. G., K. Ben-Amor, A. D. L. Akkermans, T. Abee, and W. M. de Vos. 2001. DNA isolation protocols affect the detection limit of PCR approaches of bacteria in samples from the human gastrointestinal tract. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 24:405-410.[CrossRef][Medline]
22 - Zoetendal, E. G., K. Ben-Amor, H. J. M. Harmsen, F. Schut, A. D. L. Akkermans, and W. M. de Vos. 2002. Quantification of uncultured Ruminococcus obeum-like bacteria in human fecal samples by fluorescent in situ hybridization and flow cytometry using 16S rRNA-targeted probes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:4225-4232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23 - Zoetendal, E. G., C. C. G. M. Booijink, E. S. Klaassens, H. G. H. J. Heilig, M. Kleerebezem, H. Smidt, and W. M. de Vos. 2006. Isolation of DNA from bacterial samples of the human gastrointestinal tract. Nat. Protocols 1:870-873.[CrossRef]
24 - Zoetendal, E. G., C. C. G. M. Booijink, E. S. Klaassens, H. G. H. J. Heilig, M. Kleerebezem, H. Smidt, and W. M. de Vos. 2006. Isolation of RNA from bacterial samples of the human gastrointestinal tract. Nat. Protocols 1:954-959.[CrossRef]
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2007, p. 1388-1392, Vol. 73, No. 4
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.01921-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Klaassens, E. S., Boesten, R. J., Haarman, M., Knol, J., Schuren, F. H., Vaughan, E. E., de Vos, W. M.
(2009). Mixed-Species Genomic Microarray Analysis of Fecal Samples Reveals Differential Transcriptional Responses of Bifidobacteria in Breast- and Formula-Fed Infants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
75: 2668-2676
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Keller, M., Hettich, R.
(2009). Environmental Proteomics: a Paradigm Shift in Characterizing Microbial Activities at the Molecular Level. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
73: 62-70
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zoetendal, E G, Rajilic-Stojanovic, M, de Vos, W M
(2008). High-throughput diversity and functionality analysis of the gastrointestinal tract microbiota. Gut
57: 1605-1615
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sieuwerts, S., de Bok, F. A. M., Hugenholtz, J., van Hylckama Vlieg, J. E. T.
(2008). Unraveling Microbial Interactions in Food Fermentations: from Classical to Genomics Approaches. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 4997-5007
[Full Text]
-
Gonzalez, R., Klaassens, E. S., Malinen, E., de Vos, W. M., Vaughan, E. E.
(2008). Differential Transcriptional Response of Bifidobacterium longum to Human Milk, Formula Milk, and Galactooligosaccharide. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 4686-4694
[Abstract]
[Full Text]