Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2007, p. 1921-1927, Vol. 73, No. 6
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.02479-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Queensland, Australia,1 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia2
Received 23 October 2006/ Accepted 27 December 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Decreasing chemical heterogeneity of herbicides targeting fewer mechanisms of action is increasing the prevalence of herbicide resistance (7, 22, 42). Inhibition of pyruvate phosphate dikinase (PPDK) significantly hinders C4 plant growth (26). PPDK has long been recognized as a potential, but as yet unused, biochemical target for herbicide development (9, 19, 20, 28), as C4 plants comprise most of the world's weeds (18). This enzyme occurs primarily in plants but has been found in protozoans (4, 27) such as Giardia (5), yet it is not detected in vertebrate or invertebrate animals, potentially minimizing the risk of PPDK inhibitors exhibiting adverse toxicological effects. Recently, we discovered marine macroorganism-derived extracts that selectively inhibited PPDK (8). From these, ilimaquinone (Fig. 1, structure 1) was isolated and found to inhibit PPDK as well as to be selectively toxic to C4 plants (16). Here we describe screening a collection of marine-derived fungi against PPDK and the reliable scale-up production of a PPDK-selective inhibitor.
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Ilimaquinone (1), unguinol (2), acarogobien A (3), acarogobien B (4), and guisinol (5).
|
|
|
|---|
Marine fungus growth and preparation for primary screening.
The Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) houses a collection of marine-derived fungi (2). Fungal isolates (n = 449) were streaked onto solid malt extract agar and incubated at 25°C until confluent. Each isolate was cultivated in 10 ml of five different types of medium. Media were as follows (all concentrations are in g liter1 in artificial seawater unless otherwise stated): high-nutrient medium consisted of dextrose 10, malt extract 10, yeast extract 4, unbuffered; low-nutrient medium consisted of dextrose 2, malt extract 0.2, yeast extract 0.1, unbuffered; high-pH (pH 9.5) medium consisted of dextrose 2, malt extract 2, yeast extract 1; low-pH (pH 3.5) medium consisted of dextrose 2, malt extract 2, yeast extract 1; and no-salt medium consisted of dextrose 2, malt extract 2, yeast extract 1, unbuffered in deionized and sterile water. Isolates were incubated for 8 days at 27°C in a shaking incubator at 100 rpm. Microbial cells were lysed by three consecutive freeze-thaw cycles, and the entire broth was lyophilized. The broth was extracted overnight with 10 ml ethanol (EtOH), clarified by centrifugation and decanting prior to solvent evaporation, and reconstituted in 1 ml dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) for bioassay (original screening extract).
Fungi whose extracts, when retested, reproduced the primary assay results were recultivated and extracted as described above to determine the reproducibility of bioactivity.
Fungal growth scale-up.
Fungal isolates with identified reproducible activity were cultivated in 3 x 250 ml of the medium that elicited the initial bioactivity. After incubation (8 days shaking at 100 rpm at 27°C) cells were lysed as described previously. The entire broth was lyophilized and extracted overnight with 250 ml EtOH, filtered using glass wool, and the solvent evaporated under vacuum. The dried EtOH extract was reconstituted in 10 ml DMSO for bioassay. The amount used for the bioassay was proportional to that in the original screening extract. For nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), EtOH extracts were dissolved in 10 ml EtOH and partitioned twice with H2O (100 ml) and dichloromethane (90 ml). Both the dichloromethane and H2O extracts were tested for PPDK inhibition at the same relative concentration as the original screening extract.
One bioactive isolate (F3000054) was grown in 7 x 1 liter of no-salt medium to provide sufficient biomass. Cultures were shaken (100 rpm) at 27°C for 8 days prior to the addition of equal volumes of ethyl acetate (EtOAc), stirring for 24 h, and decanting of the EtOAc layers. This EtOAc extraction was repeated twice, and the combined EtOAc extracts were evaporated under vacuum. Aqueous extracts were combined, frozen, and lyophilized. Both extracts were tested for PPDK inhibition at the same concentration as the original screening extract.
Isolation and identification of the bioactive metabolite.
A 1.0-g portion of the large-scale EtOAc extract was chromatographed on Sephadex LH20 (35 x 3 cm) with methanol (MeOH) to give 18 fractions. Fine white needles (81.7 mg, 8.1%) were crystallized from the active fraction. NMR spectra were acquired on a Bruker AC 300 spectrometer operating at 300 MHz for 1H and 75 MHz for 13C in methanol-d4 (
H 3.31 and
C 49.0, respectively) and acetone-d6 (
H 2.00 and
C 30.0 and 205.0, respectively). Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI MS) was done using an Esquire3000plus quadrupole ion trap with an Apollo source at 40 eV.
Genomic extraction and molecular taxonomy.
DNA was extracted from a 10-ml culture of the bioactive fungal isolate F3000054 by use of the hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide procedure (36). Phylogenetic identification was performed by PCR amplification (GeneAmp 9700 temperature cycler; Perkin Elmer Cetus, Shelton, CT) and sequencing of near-complete 18S rRNA gene and internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) regions of the fungal isolate. Eukaryote primers Ns1F/Ns8R were used for PCR amplification of the 18S rRNA gene and primers ITS1/ITS4 used for amplification of the ITS1 region (41). Sequencing was performed with a Dynamic ET dye sequencing kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ), and reactions were analyzed on a MegaBACE DNA analysis system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) following standard methods. A complete 18S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequence of F3000054 was obtained using conserved eukaryotic primers NS3, NS4, NS5, and NS7 (41).
Sequences were checked and compared to available sequences within the NCBI GenBank database using the BLAST algorithm (1). 18S rRNA sequence data were analyzed with the ARB software package (25). Framework trees were constructed with fastDNAml with only near-complete sequences. Missing sequence data and uncertainties in all near-complete sequences were omitted with a generated filter. The stability of branching patterns was tested using alternative treeing methods including evolutionary distance (Jukes and Cantor model) and maximum parsimony (DNAPARS) (25). Selected ITS sequence data were aligned using ClustalX (v1.83) (38) followed by manual checking. Evolutionary distance was determined using the Jukes and Cantor model to construct unrooted trees by the neighbor-joining method using PHYLIP v. 3.6 (13, 14).
Host sponge extract.
Ianthella reticulate (family Ianthellidae, order Verongida, class Demospongiae) was collected (June 1996) from Joseph Bonaparte Gulf, Australia (30-m depth, 128°39.53'E, 14°11.68'S). Approximately 2 g (wet weight) was freeze-dried; extracted with 10 ml EtOH, which was decanted and dried under vacuum; and then dissolved in 10 ml DMSO for assay.
PPDK assay.
Extract screening, enzyme selectivity testing, and all mechanistic experiments to determine inhibition parameters for substrates were conducted as detailed elsewhere (8, 16). Kinetic experiments were conducted at 5 and 10 µg ml1 of the bioactive metabolite in the presence of six substrate concentrations for the following substrates: pyruvate (40, 80, 160, 320, 480, and 720 µM), ATP (20, 40, 60, 120, 240, and 480 µM), and phosphate (0.3, 0.6, 1.2, 1.8, 2.7, and 4.32 mM). The noncompetitive inhibitor (I) binds to either the free enzyme (E) or the enzyme-substrate complex (ES), and the dissociation constants are Kic = [E][I]/[EI] and Kiu = [ES][I]/[ESI].
Whole-plant phytotoxicity.
Whole-plant phytotoxicity assessment was performed as described previously (16) with minor modifications. Seedlings of Digitaria ciliaris and barley (Hordeum vulgare) were used as models of the C4 and C3 plants, respectively. The bioactive metabolite was prepared in 0.5% DMSO and 0.08% Uptake in MeOH to give 10 mg ml1 and serially diluted down to 0.1 mg ml1 in the same formulation. Dilutions were applied to the middle section of individual flag leaves on duplicate plants by use of 5 µl per C4 leaf and 20 µl per C3 leaf, corresponding to absolute amounts applied ranging from 50 µg to 0.5 µg for C4 leaves and 200 µg to 2 µg for C3 leaves. Control plants were treated with formulation only. Plants were observed within 6 h of application of the compound and then at 24-h intervals for 5 days. Each sample was tested in duplicate with at least four plants per treatment per replicate.
Antimicrobial assays.
The antimicrobial activity of the metabolite was tested against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), and Vibrio harveyi (strain C071 [3]). Assays were conducted in a similar fashion with all manipulations of S. aureus performed in peptone yeast extract medium (peptone 10 g liter1, yeast extract 5 g liter1, NaCl 5 g liter1) and for manipulations of E. coli and V. harveyi performed in Luria-Bertani medium (DIFCO, Becton Dickinson; Australia). Inoculated medium (20 ml) was grown overnight at 37°C with shaking (150 rpm) and diluted 1,000-fold into fresh medium. Culture (198 µl) was then transferred into wells of a 96-well microtiter plate. Serial twofold dilutions of the bioactive metabolite ranging from 100 to 0.2 µg ml1 in DMSO (final concentration, 1% [vol/vol]) were added in duplicate to the 96-well microtiter plate. Solvent only was added to column 11 and antibiotic (500 µg ml1 ampicillin for S. aureus and E. coli and 500 µg ml1 streptomycin for V. harveyi) was added to column 12 to control for no growth. An initial absorbance reading was taken at 595 nm, and the plates were incubated overnight at 37°C. A final absorbance reading was taken after 24 h, and levels of growth inhibition were determined by comparing results to those for solvent controls after subtraction of background.
Anti-tumor cell assays.
MCF-7 (breast; pleural effusion adenocarcinoma, ATCC HTB-22), SF-268 (central nervous system; glioblastoma), and H460 (lung; large-cell carcinoma, ATCC HTB-177) cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium with L-glutamine supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum and maintained in a humidified incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2.
Cells were seeded in 96-well microtiter plates at a density of 4,000 (H460) or 5,000 (MCF-7 and SF-268) cells per well in 100 µl medium and allowed to attach for 24 h. Unguinol in DMSO was serially diluted in medium, added to the cells in triplicate so that the final doses ranged from 3 µg ml1 to 250 µg ml1, and returned to the incubator. Cell number was measured at 0 h and 48 h after sample addition via total cellular protein concentration with the sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay. Cells were fixed with 30 µl of 50% trichloroacetic acid for 30 min at 4°C, rinsed in running water (x5), air dried, and then stained with 50 µl 0.4% SRB in 1% acetic acid for 30 min at room temperature. Plates were washed with 1% acetic acid (x5) and then air dried. SRB dye was solubilized in 10 mM Tris (100 µl), and A490 was read on a Wallac Victor plate reader. Inhibition of growth by 50% (GI50) was determined by comparing the sample-treated values to those of the vehicle-only control and to time zero readings.
Theoretical chemical property calculations.
The theoretical logarithm of the n-octanol/water partition coefficient (log P) was calculated using ClogP (Daylight Chemical Information Systems), which implements the method of Leo (23), and the LOGKOW program (29) of the Environmental Science Centre of the Syracuse Research Corporation (Syracuse, NY). The numbers of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors were calculated by the Lipinski approach (24), and the number of rotatable bonds was counted using the interactive software provided by Molinspiration Cheminformatics (Bratislava, Slovak Republic). This same software was used to calculate molecular polar surface area (PSA) based on the method of Ertl et al. (11). This calculation was independently confirmed using Marvin (version 3.4.2; Chemaxon, Budapest, Hungary).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
Nucleotide sequence data were submitted to the NCBI GenBank database under the accession numbers EF067336 and EF067337.
|
|
|---|
All 19 isolates were regrown in the same five media, and only 11 extracts, representing eight isolates, reproduced PPDK inhibition. Activity was predominant in the high-nutrient and no-salt media. The eight fungal isolates were cultivated on a larger scale, in 250 ml, with only one isolate (F3000054) producing bioactivity under these scaled-up conditions in all media except low-pH (pH 3.5) medium. 1H NMR spectra of the active extracts of F3000054 showed similar chemical fingerprints, indicating similar chemistries.
Phylogenetic affiliation (Fig. 2A) of fungal isolate F3000054 by sequencing of the near-complete amplified fragment of the 18S rRNA indicated that it belongs to the Trichocomaceae family, with Emericella nidulans (Aspergillus nidulans) demonstrating the highest identity (99% over 1,716 bp). Comparison of ITS regions demonstrated the highest identity to Aspergillus unguis (99% over 532 bp), with the relationship to other species shown in Fig. 2B.
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Phylogenetic analyses of selected aligned 18S rDNA (A) and ITS1 (B) sequences. Unrooted trees were generated by means of the neighbor-joining method and the Jukes and Cantor algorithm model. Fusarium solani (DQ486878) was used as the out-group for both analyses. The scale bars indicate the expected numbers of base substitutions per site, with bar lengths corresponding to 1% and 10% differences for 18S rDNA and ITS1 regions, respectively.
|
Bioassay-guided fractionation of 1.0 g of the EtOAc extract yielded 81.7 mg (8.2% by weight) of a single bioactive natural product whose spectroscopic data (ESI MS and one- and two-dimensional NMR) were consistent with those reported for unguinol (Fig. 1, structure 2), previously isolated from mycelia of A. unguis (37) and A. nidulans (35).
Dose-response analysis of unguinol on PPDK revealed a 50% inhibitory concentration of 42.3 ± 0.8 µM with a Hill slope of 3.4 ± 0.5 (Fig. 3). Kinetic evaluation indicated unguinol to be a mixed noncompetitive inhibitor with respect to pyruvate (Kiu = 67.3 ± 14.4 µM, Kic = 52.0 ± 33.6 µM), a mixed noncompetitive inhibitor with respect to ATP (Kiu = 122.3 ± 52.0 µM, Kic = 140.6 ± 143.7 µM), and an uncompetitive inhibitor with respect to phosphate (Kiu = 1,070 ± 14.4 µM).
![]() View larger version (5K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Dose response of unguinol on PPDK. Data points are the means ± standard errors of two measurements. The data were fitted with a sigmoidal (Hill) dose-response curve according to the following equation: % inhibition = xn/(IC50n + xn), where n is the Hill slope and x is the concentration of unguinol. IC50 = 42.3 ± 0.8 µM; Hill slope = 3.4 ± 0.5.
|
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Phytotoxic effect of unguinol on C4 plants. (A) Five microliters of formulation (0.5% DMSO and 0.08% Uptake in MeOH); (B) 0.5 µg unguinol leaf1 (lowest dose tested); (C) 50 µg unguinol leaf1 (highest dose tested). Plants were photographed 48 h after application.
|
The sponge Ianthella reticulate, from which F3000054 was originally isolated, was also tested. The EtOH extract did not inhibit PPDK. Unguinol was not detectable by 1H NMR or ESI MS analysis in the EtOH extract.
Theoretical chemical property calculations on unguinol gave a ClogP value of 5.7, a log KOW of 4.92, and a PSA of 83.8 Å2. Unguinol also possesses two H-bond donors, five H-bond acceptors, and one rotatable bond (Table 1).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Comparison of the calculated theoretical properties and PPDK-inhibitory activities of unguinol and ilimaquinone
|
|
|
|---|
Unguinol selectively inhibited PPDK and showed mixed noncompetitive inhibition of PPDK with respect to the substrates pyruvate and ATP and was uncompetitive with respect to phosphate. The value of PPDK as an herbicide target is that it is potentially specific to C4 plants, enabling application of a weed-selective herbicide inactive against C3 crops without having to produce genetically modified crops. The spot application of unguinol caused localized leaf bleaching of D. ciliaris, a model C4 plant, indicating that the formulated unguinol could penetrate the plant cuticle and cell wall to inhibit photosynthesis, but had no effect on barley, a model C3 plant, even at much higher concentrations. The lack of toxicity against barley and the selective inhibition of PPDK, which translates into phytotoxicity on C4 plants, make unguinol worthy of further investigation as an herbicide.
The modified Lipinski's "rule of five" proposed for postemergent herbicides (39) requires a compound to meet the following physical criteria: a molecular weight of between 150 and 500; a log P value of less than 3.5; a number of hydrogen bond donors equal to or lower than three; and a number of hydrogen bond acceptors between 2 and 12, inclusive. Another important descriptor used to predict herbicide potential is the PSA, which should lie between 50 and 60 Å2 (40). Unguinol satisfies three of the five criteria, but its log P is above 3.5 and it has a PSA of greater than 60 Å2 (Table 1). Comparison of the theoretical and biological properties of unguinol with those of ilimaquinone, a PPDK inhibitor isolated from a marine sponge, indicates that although unguinol has a much greater PSA, it is a more potent inhibitor of PPDK.
The original screening extract of F3000054 inhibited the growth of S. aureus (gram-positive bacteria) and V. harveyi (gram-negative bacteria) but not that of E. coli (gram-negative bacteria). Unguinol has a similar activity profile. Interestingly, unguinol analogues acarogobien A (Fig. 1, structure 3), acarogobien B (Fig. 1, structure 4), and guisinol (Fig. 1, structure 5) also inhibit the growth of S. aureus (31, 32). Given the antimicrobial activity of unguinol, one could postulate it may provide a defense for the fungus against other microorganisms. Unguinol exhibited in vitro cytotoxicity against the three human tumor cell lines MCF-7, SF-268, and H460. Unguinol has previously been shown to act as an animal growth permittant (12) and to inhibit bile salt hydrolase (12). A few derivatives of unguinol have exhibited phospholipase A2 inhibition (17), or cytotoxicity (HOP-18, lung non-small cell line) (Pubchem [http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]); however, most have no reported bioactivity (Pubchem [http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]). Unlike ilimaquinone, unguinol and its derivatives have a narrow range of bioactivity and so are more attractive PPDK-selective herbicide candidates.
Preliminary 1H NMR analysis of all the extracts from the 10-ml cultures of F3000054 indicated that those that were inactive had spectral fingerprints different from those that inhibited PPDK activity. Comparison of the 1H NMR spectra of the EtOH extracts from the 250-ml cultures of F3000054 and of the combined EtOAc extracts of the 1-liter cultures of F3000054 with that of the isolated bioactive metabolite unguinol correlated to the reproducibility of selective PPDK inhibition and therefore to the presence of unguinol.
NMR and ESI MS analyses could not detect unguinol in the EtOH extract of the host sponge I. reticulate. In the laboratory, however, we found that the fungus produced unguinol in high yield when cultured in the high-nutrient or the no-salt media. From this, we conclude that a saline environment is not essential for unguinol production. It is well documented that aspergilli are prolific sources of metabolites as well as being salt tolerant, fast growing, and easily obtained from most substrates (6). No evidence was found to indicate this fungus produces unguinol in the fungus/sponge matrix, and to date there are no other reports of unguinol being produced by any other marine-derived organism. Guisinol (Fig. 1, structure 5), a closely related precursor depside, however, was isolated from a marine-derived E. unguis (teleomorph of A. unguis) (31).
Although this study focused on isolating PPDK-selective compounds, the issue of supply, whether by synthetic, semisynthetic, microbial, cell culture, or whole-organism production, must be addressed when commercial potential is considered. The fact that the production of unguinol is easily scaled up using a number of different media lends the process to further optimization. The commercial yield of thiocoraline, an anticancer agent isolated from the bacterium Micromonospora marina, is approximately 9 mg liter1 (33). With minimal manipulation, a yield of approximately 40 mg liter1 was achieved in this study, indicating that with further optimization of the growth conditions, such as light, temperature, time, periodicity, and medium type, commercial-scale supply of unguinol and its derivatives may be readily achievable.
During the present study, we identified a number of microorganism-derived extracts that inhibited PPDK activity. By using an integrated in vitro/in vivo screening strategy and taking into consideration the need for a commercially sustainable supply, unguinol was identified as a new lead herbicide. Unguinol also has the potential to be used as a biochemical probe for the structure and function of PPDK as well as to provide a template quite different from that of ilimaquinone for structure-activity relationship studies to improve its herbicidal properties.
Authority to collect the sponge was provided by the Commonwealth of Australia legislation Australian Institute of Marine Science Act 1972. Sponge taxonomy was undertaken by P. Bergquist. We thank C. Hooi, R. Anderson, and C. Cullinane of the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre for a gift of the H460 and MCF-7 cells. We also thank those AIMS staff, both past and present, involved in the acquisition of samples for the production of marine natural product extracts.
Published ahead of print on 12 January 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»