Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2007, p. 2001-2004, Vol. 73, No. 6
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.02515-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Biochemical Characterization of an L-Xylulose Reductase from Neurospora crassa
,
Nikhil Nair1 and
Huimin Zhao1,2,3,4*
Departments of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,1
Chemistry,2
Center for Biophysics and Computational Biology,3
Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 600 S. Mathews Avenue, Urbana, Illinois 618014
Received 28 October 2006/
Accepted 8 January 2007

ABSTRACT
An
L-xylulose reductase identified from the genome sequence
of the filamentous fungus
Neurospora crassa was heterologously
expressed in
Escherichia coli as a His
6 tag fusion protein,
purified, and characterized. The enzyme may be used in the production
of xylitol from the major pentose components of hemicellulosic
waste,
D-xylose and
L-arabinose.

INTRODUCTION
L-Xylulose reductase (LXR; EC 1.1.1.10) is the third of five
enzymes, in fungi, involved in the assimilation of
L-arabinose
into the pentose phosphate pathway (
1). As a member of the short-chain
dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) superfamily, the catalytic action
of LXR for the reduction of
L-xylulose to xylitol requires a
concomitant oxidization of a nicotinamide cofactor. With the
exception of that from the yeast
Ambrosiozyma monospora, all
known LXRs are known to be strictly NADPH dependent (
16). Although
LXRs are also found in higher eukaryotes such as humans, guinea
pigs, pigeons, and rats and catalyze the same reaction, their
metabolic role is fundamentally different, realized in the glucuronic
acid/uronate cycle of glucose metabolism (
5,
15), and also the
catalytic oxidation of

-dicarbonyl compounds (
6,
12), rather
than in
L-arabinose metabolism.
Very few LXRs have been isolated and characterized to date; in fact, the identification of an LXR encoding gene in fungi was discovered only recently in Trichoderma reesei (Hypocrea jecorina) (13). In addition, LXRs have not found much commercial use, and their natural substrate, L-xylulose, is relatively expensive. We realize that the potential of LXR could be actualized in utilization of the pentose fraction hemicellulosic waste, which is primarily D-xylose and L-arabinose, for the production of xylitol, a pentitol sugar alternative with several favorable properties (7-11). Such a process would require concurrent utilization of three enzymes: a xylose reductase, an L-arabinitol-4-dehydrogenase, and an L-xylulose reductase. To the best of our knowledge, a fungal pathway for the co-utilization of D-xylose and L-arabinose to produce xylitol has never been attempted, either in vitro or in vivo. To implement such a strategy, a highly active and stable LXR from a fungal source needs to be identified, which has not yet been done. Here we report the identification, heterologous expression, purification, and characterization of a highly active and stable LXR from Neurospora crassa.

Gene identification.
We postulated with the discovery of the highly catalytically
efficient xylose reductase from
Neurospora crassa (
18) that
the other enzymes involved the same
L-arabinose utilization
pathway may also be extremely active. Using the protein sequence
of
T. reesei LXR (GenBank accession no. AF375616.1) as a query
for a BLASTP search (
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), the 271-amino-acid
hypothetical protein NCU09041.1 in the
N. crassa sequenced genome
(
3) was found as a putative LXR. A sequence alignment revealed
a

79% identity at the amino acid level with the search query.
In addition, the protein has the conserved SDR catalytic triad
of serine, tyrosine, and lysine (
14). A BLAST search for homology
with
D-arabinitol dehydrogenases, enzymes with similar reaction
substrate profiles, revealed

38% identity. These findings suggested
that this hypothetical protein is most likely an LXR.

Cloning, heterologous expression, and purification.
For experimental details, please see the supplemental material.
PCR-amplified reverse-transcribed cDNA from
L-arabinose-induced
N. crassa 10333 showed a specific high-yield product of the
expected gene size for
lxr. This product was cloned into pET-28a(+)
plasmid vector using NdeI and SacI restriction sites, which
included an N-terminal His
6 tag via a thrombin-recognized linker
sequence. The circularized plasmid was electroporated into
E. coli BL21(DE3) and selected on kanamycin-supplemented LB plates.
After confirming soluble, active enzyme expression by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis using cell lysates of isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-induced cultures, as well as by activity assay, the His6-tagged LXR was purified by using single-step gravity immobilized metal affinity column chromatography. The protein concentration was determined by using the extinction coefficient as calculated by San Diego Supercomputer Center Biology Workbench (http://workbench.sdsc.edu) as 32,670 M1 cm1 at 280 nm. The enzyme purity was confirmed by SDS-PAGE analysis and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. The final yield of tagged LXR was 18 mg (
60 mg/liter of culture) of >95% pure LXR with a molecular mass of
30 kDa, which corresponds well to the calculated combined mass of
31 kDa for the His6-LXR (Fig. 1). Although the yield could be further improved by optimizing fermentation techniques, the acquired quantity and purity is sufficient for characterization purposes. The His6 tag was cleaved by incubating the tagged LXR with thrombin (Fig. 1), and it was found that cleaving the tag restored ca. 16% of the activity (data not shown). Therefore, the untagged LXR was used for all further analysis.

Steady-state kinetics.
Reaction kinetics were studied as for other NADP(H)-consuming
oxidoreductases (
18) by observing the initial change in absorbance
at 340 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (as described in
the supplemental material). All kinetic parameters for both
forward and reverse reactions were determined at 25°C in
100 mM morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS; pH 7.0) and are
summarized in Table
1. Purified
N. crassa LXR had a strong preference
for NADPH, displaying activity below the level of detection
in the presence of NADH (see the description of high-performance
liquid chromatography [HPLC] analysis for NADH acceptance below).
The enzyme does not catalyze the reduction of
L-arabinose,
D-xylose,
D-glucose, and
D-galactose or the oxidation of
L-arabinitol
at detectable levels, which is consistent with other characterized
LXRs (
12,
13). Although the kinetic parameters for
L-xylulose
and
D-xylulose could not be determined because the reaction
velocity did not plateau in the range of concentrations tested,
limited by cost of the expensive substrate, the
Km values seem
to be unusually high. However, the enzyme displays the highest
specific activity toward
L-xylulose compared to any other substrate
tested, including
D-xylulose or
D-ribulose (Table
1). LXRs have
been known to have lower
Km values for
D-ribulose than for
L-xylulose
(
16). These data confirm that it is neither an
D-arabinitol
dehydrogenase nor an
D-xylulose reductase but rather an LXR.
The
Km values for all three pentulose substrates are at least
1 to 2 orders of magnitude higher than for any other characterized
LXR, whereas the
Vmax is comparable to that of the yeast
A. monospora but significantly higher than that of the fungus
T. reesei (Table
2).

HPLC analysis for NADH acceptance.
The acceptance of NADH as cofactor by
N. crassa LXR was examined
by HPLC. The separation of NAD
+ and NADH was carried out as
described elsewhere (
19). We set up 100-µl reaction mixtures
consisting of 1 mM NADH and 10 mM
D-ribulose in 100 mM MOPS
(pH 7.0) and, after the addition of approximately 64.5 µg
of enzyme, the reaction was allowed to proceed for 1 h at 25°C.
Relative to the control reactions, this reaction yielded a significantly
larger peak, with a retention time corresponding to authentic
NAD
+ (see the supplemental material). This indicates that
N. crassa LXR does accept NADH, although with a low average specific
activity of 0.083 µmol/min/mg compared to 7.8 µmol/min/mg
for NADPH as calculated for the same reactant concentrations.

Temperature dependence.
The optimal temperature for catalysis was determined by assaying
LXR activities at temperatures ranging from 15 to 60°C by
using a recirculating water bath connected to the UV-Vis spectrophotometer
with a jacketed cuvette holder. The data show the optimum reaction
temperature to be approximately 37°C (Fig.
2A). At higher
temperatures the enzyme rapidly inactivates, whereas at lower
temperatures the rate decreases with temperature in accordance
with Arrhenius' equation. The energy of activation for LXR was
determined to be 19.8 ± 1.1 kJ/mol by fitting the data
from 15 to 30°C to the Arrhenius equation.
N. crassa LXR
was found to be naturally stable, since it retained >85%
activity after incubation at 25°C for over 6 h and >75%
activity at 37°C after the same period of incubation (data
not shown). Thermal inactivation was studied by incubating LXR
in a heating block with a heated lid at 45°C in 100 mM MOPS
(pH 7.0). Samples were removed at various times to detect residual
activity at 25°C. The percent residual activity was plotted
as a function of incubation time (Fig.
2B) and followed a first-order
exponential decay with a half-life of about 13 min.

pH dependence.
The effect of pH on LXR's activity was studied in constant-ionic-strength
buffers to prevent the introduction of artifacts due to differing
buffer components. For reduction, 2 mM
D-ribulose and >200
µM NADPH in either acetate-2-(
N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic
acid (MES)-Tris buffer (pH 4.5 to 8.0) or MES-3-(cyclohexylamino)ethanesulfonic
acid (CHES)-Tris buffer (pH 7.0 to 9.5) were used. Similarly,
for oxidation 1,000 mM xylitol and 2 mM NADP in either acetate-MES-Tris
buffer (pH 6.5 to 8.5) or Tris-CHES-3-(cyclohexylamino)-1-propanesulfonic
acid (CAPS) buffer (pH 8.0 to 11.0) were used. The optimal pH
was determined to be 7.0 for reduction and 9.0 for oxidation
(Fig.
2C). The enzyme demonstrated a broad range of activity
with >50% reductase activity between pH 4.5 and 8.5.

Determination of quaternary structure.
To determine the quaternary structure, size-exclusion HPLC on
a Bio-Sil SEC-250 column (300 by 7.8 mm) was performed by using
an Agilent 1100 series HPLC system with 100 mM Na
2HPO
4, 150
mM NaCl, and 10 mM NaN
3 (pH 6.8) as the mobile phase. A Bio-Rad
standard was used to standardize the column's retention time
with respect to molecular mass (see the supplemental material).
The mass determined from the retention time was 62.2 kDa, close
to a 58.2-kDa estimated mass for an LXR homodimer with a GlyHisSer
linker remnant from the His
6 tag at the N terminus. Multimeric
states are not uncommon, with several mammalian LXRs, including
human, being tetrameric (
2).

Homology modeling.
Using the coordinates (Protein Data Bank [PDB];
www.wwpdb.org)
for the human LXR (PDB accession codes 1PR9 and 1WNT) (
2) and
the NADP-dependent mannitol 2-dehydrogenase from
Agaricus bisporus (PDB accession code 1H5Q) (
4), a homology model was created
with the Molecular Operating Environment (MOE; Chemical Computing
Group). Templates were chosen on the basis that the human LXR
is the only LXR with a solved crystal structure, and mannitol
2-dehydrogenases are known to share high catalytic and sequence
similarity with LXRs (
13). The model was verified for consistency
with known protein folds and allowed

and

angles (see the supplemental
material). Compared to the human LXR, the
N. crassa LXR is longer
by 14 amino acids in the N terminus. As can be seen from Fig.
3, the
N. crassa LXR N terminus is modeled as an

-helix that
is not present in the human LXR. The long distance of the N-terminal
helix from the catalytic site explains why the addition of a
linker and a His
6 tag does not significantly affect the catalytic
efficiency of the protein. In addition, the
N. crassa LXR is
27 amino acids longer, which would account for the longer loop
regions. The catalytic triad Ser136, Tyr149, and Lys153 of human
LXR have similar locations and orientations in the
N. crassa LXR. The differing orientation of NADP in the active site is
probably due to the steric effects between the bulky Tyr57 side
chain and the adenine group of NADP in
N. crassa LXR. In the
human LXR, Ser37 is not likely to cause similar steric effects.
The low levels of activity toward NADH can possibly be explained
by the presence of hydrophobic Ala58 and Gly214 in the place
of Arg39 and Ser185 in human LXR that stabilizes the 2'-phosphate
group of NADPH. Although residues in the substrate binding site,
other than the catalytic triad (Ser, Tyr, and Lys), are not
strongly conserved between human and
N. crassa LXR, they remain
in general moderately to highly hydrophobic, with the exception
of Asp220 in
N. crassa LXR in place of Tyr191 (
6), which would
make the pocket more hydrophilic. However, the role of this
residue seems unclear since it is conserved between the fungal
LXRs,
N. crassa and
T. reesei, but not with the LXR from the
yeast
A. monospora, having a strongly hydrophobic Ile217 in
the corresponding position.
In conclusion, we have identified and characterized a highly
active LXR from
N. crassa that can be heterologously expressed
and purified with high yield in
E. coli. The enzyme was characterized
as stable and active over a wide range of temperatures and pH.
Although it shows unusually high
Km values toward pentulose
substrates, it displays one of the highest turnover numbers
(
kcat) among characterized LXRs and may prove useful in the
co-utilization of
D-xylose and
L-arabinose for the production
of xylitol or ethanol.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Support for this research was provided by the Biotechnology
Research and Development Consortium (project 2-4-121) and the
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University
of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Access to the Insight II and MOE programs was provided by The University of Illinois School of Chemical Sciences' Computer Application and Network Services. We thank Ryan Sullivan and Ryan Woodyer for help with the HPLC analyses and Hua Zhao for help in cloning and characterizing the L-xylulose reductase.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 215 RAL, Box C3, 600 S. Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801. Phone: (217) 333-2631. Fax: (217) 333-5052. E-mail:
zhao5{at}uiuc.edu.

Published ahead of print on 19 January 2007. 
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/. 

REFERENCES
1 - Chiang, C., and S. G. Knight. 1960. A new pathway of pentose metabolism. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 3:554-559.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - El-Kabbani, O., V. Carbone, C. Darmanin, S. Ishikura, and A. Hara. 2005. Structure of the tetrameric form of human L-xylulose reductase: probing the inhibitor-binding site with molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis. Proteins 60:424-432.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Galagan, J. E., S. E. Calvo, K. A. Borkovich, E. U. Selker, N. D. Read, D. Jaffe, W. FitzHugh, L. J. Ma, S. Smirnov, S. Purcell, B. Rehman, T. Elkins, R. Engels, S. Wang, C. B. Nielsen, J. Butler, M. Endrizzi, D. Qui, P. Ianakiev, D. Bell-Pedersen, M. A. Nelson, M. Werner-Washburne, C. P. Selitrennikoff, J. A. Kinsey, E. L. Braun, A. Zelter, U. Schulte, G. O. Kothe, G. Jedd, W. Mewes, C. Staben, E. Marcotte, D. Greenberg, A. Roy, K. Foley, J. Naylor, N. Stange-Thomann, R. Barrett, S. Gnerre, M. Kamal, M. Kamvysselis, E. Mauceli, C. Bielke, S. Rudd, D. Frishman, S. Krystofova, C. Rasmussen, R. L. Metzenberg, D. D. Perkins, S. Kroken, C. Cogoni, G. Macino, D. Catcheside, W. Li, R. J. Pratt, S. A. Osmani, C. P. DeSouza, L. Glass, M. J. Orbach, J. A. Berglund, R. Voelker, O. Yarden, M. Plamann, S. Seiler, J. Dunlap, A. Radford, R. Aramayo, D. O. Natvig, L. A. Alex, G. Mannhaupt, D. J. Ebbole, M. Freitag, I. Paulsen, M. S. Sachs, E. S. Lander, C. Nusbaum, and B. Birren. 2003. The genome sequence of the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Nature 422:859-868.[CrossRef][Medline]
4 - Horer, S., J. Stoop, H. Mooibroek, U. Baumann, and J. Sassoon. 2001. The crystallographic structure of the mannitol 2-dehydrogenase NADP+ binary complex from Agaricus bisporus. J. Biol. Chem. 276:27555-27561.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Hutcheson, R. M., V. H. Reynolds, and O. Touster. 1956. The reduction of L-xylulose to xylitol by guinea pig liver mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 221:697-709.[Free Full Text]
6 - Ishikura, S., T. Isaji, N. Usami, K. Kitahara, J. Nakagawa, and A. Hara. 2001. Molecular cloning, expression and tissue distribution of hamster diacetyl reductase: identity with L-xylulose reductase. Chem. Biol. Interact. 130-132:879-889.
7 - Kitchens, D. H. 2005. Xylitol in the prevention of oral diseases. Spec. Care Dentist. 25:140-144.[Medline]
8 - Ly, K. A., P. Milgrom, and M. Rothen. 2006. Xylitol, sweeteners, and dental caries. Pediatr. Dent. 28:154-198.[Medline]
9 - Maguire, A., and A. J. Rugg-Gunn. 2003. Xylitol and caries prevention: is it a magic bullet? Br. Dent. J. 194:429-436.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Mattila, P. T., M. L. Knuuttila, and M. J. Svanberg. 1998. Dietary xylitol supplementation prevents osteoporotic changes in streptozotocin-diabetic rats. Metabolism 47:578-583.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Mattila, P. T., M. J. Svanberg, P. Pokka, and M. L. Knuuttila. 1998. Dietary xylitol protects against weakening of bone biomechanical properties in ovariectomized rats. J. Nutr. 128:1811-1814.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Nakagawa, J., S. Ishikura, J. Asami, T. Isaji, N. Usami, A. Hara, T. Sakurai, K. Tsuritani, K. Oda, M. Takahashi, M. Yoshimoto, N. Otsuka, and K. Kitamura. 2002. Molecular characterization of mammalian dicarbonyl/ L-xylulose reductase and its localization in kidney. J. Biol. Chem. 277:17883-17891.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Richard, P., M. Putkonen, R. Vaananen, J. Londesborough, and M. Penttila. 2002. The missing link in the fungal L-arabinose catabolic pathway, identification of the L-xylulose reductase gene. Biochemistry 41:6432-6437.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 - Tanaka, N., T. Nonaka, K. T. Nakamura, and A. Hara. 2001. SDR: structure, mechanism of action, and substrate recognition. Curr. Organic Chem. 5:89-111.
15 - Touster, O., R. M. Hutcheson, and L. Rice. 1955. The influence of D-glucuronolactone on the excretion of L-xylulose by humans and guinea pigs. J. Biol. Chem. 215:677-684.[Free Full Text]
16 - Verho, R., M. Putkonen, J. Londesborough, M. Penttila, and P. Richard. 2004. A novel NADH-linked L-xylulose reductase in the L-arabinose catabolic pathway of yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 279:14746-14751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Witteveen, C. F. B., F. Weber, R. Busink, and J. Visser. 1994. Isolation and characterization of two xylitol dehydrogenases from Aspergillus niger. Microbiology 140:1679-1685.
18 - Woodyer, R., M. Simurdiak, W. A. van der Donk, and H. Zhao. 2005. Heterologous expression, purification, and characterization of a highly active xylose reductase from Neurospora crassa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:1642-1647.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19 - Woodyer, R., W. A. van der Donk, and H. Zhao. 2003. Relaxing the nicotinamide cofactor specificity of phosphite dehydrogenase by rational design. Biochemistry 42:11604-11614.[CrossRef][Medline]
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, March 2007, p. 2001-2004, Vol. 73, No. 6
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.02515-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.