This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smolina, I.
Right arrow Articles by Frank-Kamenetskii, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smolina, I.
Right arrow Articles by Frank-Kamenetskii, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Smolina, I.
Right arrow Articles by Frank-Kamenetskii, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2007, p. 2324-2328, Vol. 73, No. 7
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02038-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

SHORT REPORT

Detection of Low-Copy-Number Genomic DNA Sequences in Individual Bacterial Cells by Using Peptide Nucleic Acid-Assisted Rolling-Circle Amplification and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization{triangledown} ,{dagger}

Irina Smolina,1 Charles Lee,2 and Maxim Frank-Kamenetskii1*

Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, 36 Cummington St., Boston, Massachusetts 02215,1 Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 20 Shattuck St., Thorn Building, Boston, Massachusetts 021152

Received 28 August 2006/ Accepted 30 January 2007


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
An approach is proposed for in situ detection of short signature DNA sequences present in single copies per bacterial genome. The site is locally opened by peptide nucleic acids, and a circular oligonucleotide is assembled. The amplicon generated by rolling circle amplification is detected by hybridization with fluorescently labeled decorator probes.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a convenient method for bacterial identification (23, 25, 27, 31, 34). Due to their high copy numbers (104 to 105), rRNAs have long been regarded as the most suitable targets for bacterial FISH (2, 3, 8). With the advent of the era of "global" genome sequencing and the parallel development of potent signal amplification techniques (7, 21, 25, 29), it has recently become possible to target other nucleic acid sites (4, 13, 22, 24, 32), including regions of bacterial chromosomal DNA (34, 36). However, these new approaches require long probes, very high probe concentrations, and long hybridization (35, 36). A shorter target sequence would increase assay specificity: shorter probes are less tolerant of base pair mismatches and also can result in better discrimination between otherwise very similar bacteria. Recently, another approach has been described for the in situ detection of low-copy-number genomic sequences by using short (35- to 39-nucleotide [nt]-long) target sequences, rolling-circle amplification (RCA), and FISH. However, this approach cannot be performed directly on slides and involves embedding the cells into membrane filters and heating them to denature genomic DNA (19, 20).

An isothermal amplification method reported in the literature, the multiple displacement amplification reaction, uses phi29 DNA polymerase and random primers to amplify genomic DNA (6, 18). It is applied for DNA microarray-based screening and direct detection of pathogen-specific DNA (1, 14, 28, 30, 33).

We describe here a new approach to using low-copy-number genomic sequences as targets for the detection of specific bacteria. The technique expands both the utility and the resolving power of whole-cell FISH for the detection of microbes and may be useful in food, environmental, clinical diagnostic, and national security-related applications.

Our major tool is peptide nucleic acid (PNA) (Fig. 1). PNA openers have a unique ability to locally open double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) via binding to one of the two DNA strands, leaving the other strand accessible for hybridization with synthetic oligonucleotide probes. Such a complex between dsDNA, a pair of PNAs, and the oligonucleotide probe is called a PD-loop (5). The binding sites for each of the two PNA openers must be short (7- to 10-bp-long) homopurine-homopyrimidine tracts, and they are separated by an arbitrary sequence of nucleobases of up to 10 bp. We call such a site consisting of two PNA-binding sites and the linker sequence the PD-loop site. Statistically, such sites are expected to exist once per a few hundred base pairs of DNA sequence (see reference 9 and the supplemental material).


Figure 1
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 1. Major steps of a DNA-based assay for fluorescence in situ detection of short DNA sequences in a single bacterial cell. dNTPs, deoxynucleoside triphosphates.

After the opening of a PD-loop site with a pair of PNA openers, a circular probe is assembled by T4 DNA ligase by using a circularizable oligonucleotide with termini that are complementary to the displaced strand (11, 15, 16) (Fig. 1, step 2). This circular probe assembly is exceedingly sequence specific since only chosen sites are opened by PNA openers and the remaining DNA maintains its duplex form and is inaccessible for mismatch hybridization (10, 11, 16, 26).

Fluorescence labeling is achieved by an RCA reaction on the circular probe (17) in the presence of fluorescently labeled decorators. These decorators consist of linear oligonucleotides with fluorophores at their termini; their hybridization to single-stranded DNA produced by RCA yields the multiply fluorescently labeled product (Fig. 1, step 3). The fluorescent signal is readily detected by standard techniques using fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 1, step 4).

Our approach integrates the highly specific and sensitive recognition of target dsDNA sequences by using PNA openers and circularized probes with efficient signal amplification by RCA. We report here the results of proof-of-principle experiments performed with three bacterial species: Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Streptococcus mutans.

Table 1 presents the PD-loop sites chosen for the three bacterial species along with corresponding PNA openers, circularizable probes, decorators, and primer sequences (see methods in the supplemental material). The chosen target sites (Table 1) correspond to various genomic regions and to various DNA strands: coding and noncoding regions and sense and antisense strands in coding regions. All these sites yielded similar signals (see below), which excluded the possibility that the signal was due to the targeting of mRNA transcripts. To additionally exclude RNA targeting by our probes, RNA was degraded by subjecting all samples to RNase A treatment (see methods in the supplemental material).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Signature sites, PNAs, circularizable oligonucleotides, decorator probes, and primer used in this work

We first validated our approach using E. coli and B. subtilis as model organisms. All steps were sequentially performed (Fig. 1) with cells fixed on polylysine slides (see methods in the supplemental material). Cells were counterstained by DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole), and slides were evaluated by fluorescence microscopy using standard FISH equipment and software. Figure 2 shows typical results of experiments with E. coli and B. subtilis. Both bacteria gave clear signals (red for E. coli and green for B. subtilis) when a set of site-specific genomic probes was applied (Fig. 2A and D). Figure 1 presents the data for only one site for each species (see the legend to Fig. 1). Very similar data (not shown) were obtained for three other sites (two for E. coli and one for B. subtilis).


Figure 2
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 2. Images of bacterial cells observed by using a fluorescence microscope in experiments performed according to the scheme presented in Fig. 1. The fluorescence signals were acquired separately using three filter sets (DAPI for DNA and Cy3 or fluorescein for the labeled RCA product). Each image is a superposition of two separate images, with DAPI and Cy3 or DAPI and fluorescein signals pseudocolored in blue and red or blue and green, respectively. (A) E. coli cells to which the probes corresponding to the 21-nt target site in the E. coli cold shock protein gene (csp) region, PNA1, PNA2, ODNcspG, and decR, were applied (Table 1). Virtually all cells displayed very bright spots. No such spots were observed in numerous negative control experiments in which any of the steps of the protocol given in Fig. 1 were omitted (see the supplemental material). (B) The same procedure as that described in the legend to panel A was carried out with a combination of all probes specific to E. coli (PNA1, PNA2, PNA3, PNA4, ODNcspG, ODNrpoN, ODNrnr, and decR) (Table 1) applied to B. subtilis cells. No signal was detected. (C) A combination of probes specific to B. subtilis (PNA4, PNA5, PNA6, PNA7, ODNserA, ODNyxjA, and decG) was applied to E. coli cells. No signal was detected. (D) B. subtilis cells to which the probes corresponding to the 23-nt target site in the B. subtilis phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase gene (serA) region (PNA5, PNA6, ODNserA, and decG) were applied.

No signal was observed in various negative control experiments, which are described in the supplemental material. To confirm the specificity of detection and to exclude the possibility of nonspecific probe binding to cell structures, a mixture of all E. coli-specific probes was applied to B. subtilis cells and vice versa. No cross signals were observed (Fig. 2B and C). The data shown in Fig. 2 demonstrate that our approach can specifically target single-copy, short DNA sequences in bacteria and can generate a detection signal readily seen by fluorescence microscopy.

We then performed our protocol with a mixture of E. coli and B. subtilis cells, combining the corresponding probes (Table 1). Nearly all cells on mixed slides displayed a red or green signal only (Fig. 3A). Although on these slides E. coli and B. subtilis cells can appear morphologically similar, the results of the control experiments (Fig. 2) support the premise that red fluorescence is specific to E. coli and green fluorescence is specific to B. subtilis.


Figure 3
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 3. (A) Images of bacterial cells observed by using a fluorescence microscope in experiments performed with a mixture of E. coli and B. subtilis cells to which a combination of probes specific to E. coli and B. subtilis, PNA3, PNA4, PNA7, ODNrnr, ODNyxjA, decR, and decG, were applied. E. coli and B. subtilis bacteria can be distinguished from each other in the mixture of both types of cells. (B) S. mutans cells to which the probes corresponding to the 22-nt target site in the S. mutans wall-associated protein gene (wapA), PNA8, PNA9, ODNwapA, and decG, were applied. Virtually all cells are colored green. No such spots were observed in various negative control experiments in which any of the steps were omitted (data not shown). The insert shows an enlarged image of several S. mutans cells. (C) Images of bacterial cells observed by using a fluorescence microscope in experiments performed with E. coli and S. mutans cells with the combination of probes specific to E. coli (rpoN and rnr) and S. mutans (hypP): PNA3, PNA4, PNA6, ODNrpoN, ODNrnr, ODNhypP, decR, and decG. The fluorescent signals were acquired separately using three filter sets with DAPI, Cy3, and fluorescein.

We also investigated a mixture of bacillary and coccal bacteria. Figure 3C shows some resulting data for the mixture of E. coli and S. mutans, in which round cocci and rod-shaped bacilli show green and red signals, respectively.

In this study, every site arbitrarily chosen (eight sites total) from the genome database worked as a specific signature site for the corresponding bacterium. The data support the idea that the proposed approach could be used as a universal tool for specific bacterial detection.

We also verified that bacterial detection by our method is possible with clinical and environmental samples (see the supplemental material).


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Kevin Luk for technical help and useful comments and Nancy S. Miller for reading the manuscript and making many useful suggestions.

This work was supported by grants from the Coulter Foundation and from the National Institutes of Health (CA112418).


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, 36 Cummington St., Boston, MA 02215. Phone: (617) 353-8492. Fax: (617) 353-8501. E-mail: mfk{at}bu.edu. Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 9 February 2007. Back

{dagger} Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Abulencia, C. B., D. L. Wyborski, J. A. Garcia, M. Podar, W. Chen, S. H. Chang, H. W. Chang, D. Watson, E. L. Brodie, T. C. Hazen, and M. Keller. 2006. Environmental whole-genome amplification to access microbial populations in contaminated sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:3291-3301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    2. 2
  2. Amann, R., F.-O. Glockner, and A. Neef. 1997. Modern methods in subsurface microbiology: in situ identification of microorganisms with nucleic acid probes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 20:191-200.
    3. 3
  3. Amann, R. I., W. Ludwig, and K.-H. Schleifer. 1995. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol. Rev. 59:143-169.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Bakermans, C., and E. L. Madsen. 2002. Detection in coal tar waste-contaminated groundwater of mRNA transcripts related to naphthalene dioxygenase by fluorescent in situ hybridization with tyramide signal amplification. J. Microbiol. Methods 50:75-84.[CrossRef][Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Bukanov, N. O., V. V. Demidov, P. E. Nielsen, and M. D. Frank-Kamenetskii. 1998. PD-loop: a complex of duplex DNA with an oligonucleotide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:5516-5520.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Dean, F. B., S. Hosono, L. Fang, X. Wu, A. F. Faruqi, P. Bray-Ward, Z. Sun, Q. Zong, Y. Du, J. Du, M. Driscoll, W. Song, S. F. Kingsmore, M. Egholm, and R. S. Lasken. 2002. Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:5261-5266.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    7. 7
  7. DeLong, E. F., L. T. Taylor, T. L. Marsh, and C. M. Preston. 1999. Visualization and enumeration of marine planktonic archaea and bacteria by using polyribonucleotide probes and fluorescent in situ hybridization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:5554-5563.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    8. 8
  8. DeLong, E. F., G. S. Wickham, and N. R. Pace. 1989. Phylogenetic stains: ribosomal RNA-based probes for the identification of single cells. Science 243:1360-1363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    9. 9
  9. Demidov, V., N. Bukanov, and M. D. Frank-Kamenetskii. 1999. Duplex DNA capture, p. 266. In M. Egholm and P. E. Nielsen (ed.), Peptide nucleic acids: protocols and applications. Horizon Scientific, Wymondham, United Kingdom.
    10. 10
  10. Demidov, V. V., and M. D. Frank-Kamenetskii. 2004. Two sides of the coin: affinity and specificity of nucleic acid interactions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 29:62-71.[CrossRef][Medline]
    11. 11
  11. Demidov, V. V., H. Kuhn, I. V. Lavrentieva-Smolina, and M. D. Frank-Kamenetskii. 2001. Peptide nucleic acid-assisted topological labeling of duplex DNA. Methods 23:123-131.[CrossRef][Medline]
    12. 12
  12. Egholm, M., L. Christensen, K. L. Dueholm, O. Buchardt, J. Coull, and P. E. Nielsen. 1995. Efficient pH-independent sequence-specific DNA binding by pseudoisocytosine-containing bis-PNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:217-222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. Hahn, D., R. I. Amann, and J. Zeyer. 1993. Detection of mRNA in Streptomyces cells by whole-cell hybridization with digoxigenin-labeled probes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:2753-2757.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    14. 14
  14. Hutchison, C. A., H. O. Smith, C. Pfannkoch, and J. C. Venter. 2005. Cell-free cloning using phi29 DNA polymerase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:17332-17336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Kuhn, H., V. V. Demidov, and M. D. Frank-Kamenetskii. 1999. Topological links between duplex DNA and a circular DNA single strand. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Eng. 38:1446-1449.
    16. 16
  16. Kuhn, H., V. V. Demidov, and M. D. Frank-Kamenetskii. 2000. An earring for the double helix: assembly of topological links comprising duplex DNA and a circular oligodeoxynucleotide. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 11:221-225.
    17. 17
  17. Kuhn, H., V. V. Demidov, and M. D. Frank-Kamenetskii. 2002. Rolling-circle amplification under topological constraints. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:574-580.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    18. 18
  18. Lasken, R. S., and M. Egholm. 2003. Whole genome amplification: abundant supplies of DNA from precious samples or clinical specimens. Trends Biotechnol. 21:531-535.[CrossRef][Medline]
    19. 19
  19. Maruyama, F., T. Kenzaka, N. Yamaguchi, K. Tani, and M. Nasu. 2005. Visualization and enumeration of bacteria carrying a specific gene sequence by in situ rolling circle amplification. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:7933-7940.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    20. 20
  20. Maruyama, F., K. Tani, T. Kenzaka, N. Yamaguchi, and M. Nasu. 2006. Quantitative determination of free-DNA uptake in river bacteria at the single-cell level by in situ rolling-circle amplification. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:6248-6256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    21. 21
  21. Morris, R. M., M. S. Rappe, S. A. Connon, K. L. Vergin, W. A. Siebold, C. A. Carlson, and S. J. Giovannoni. 2002. SAR11 clade dominates ocean surface bacterioplankton communities. Nature 420:806-810.[CrossRef][Medline]
    22. 22
  22. Moter, A., and U. B. Gobel. 2000. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for direct visualization of microorganisms. J. Microbiol. Methods 41:85-112.[CrossRef][Medline]
    23. 23
  23. Mothershed, E. A., and A. M. Whitney. 2006. Nucleic acid-based methods for the detection of bacterial pathogens: present and future considerations for the clinical laboratory. Clin. Chim. Acta 363:206-220.[CrossRef][Medline]
    24. 24
  24. Pernthaler, A., and R. Amann. 2004. Simultaneous fluorescence in situ hybridization of mRNA and rRNA in environmental bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:5426-5433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    25. 25
  25. Pernthaler, A., C. M. Preston, J. Pernthaler, E. F. DeLong, and R. Amann. 2002. Comparison of fluorescently labeled oligonucleotide and polynucleotide probes for the detection of pelagic marine bacteria and archaea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:661-667.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    26. 26
  26. Potaman, V. N. 2003. Applications of triple-stranded nucleic acid structures to DNA purification, detection and analysis. Exp. Rev. Mol. Diagn. 3:481-496.[CrossRef][Medline]
    27. 27
  27. Procop, G. W. 2002. In situ hybridization for the detection of infectious agents. Clin. Microbiol. Newsl. 24:121-125.
    28. 28
  28. Raghunathan, A., H. R. Ferguson, Jr., C. J. Bornarth, W. Song, M. Driscoll, and R. S. Lasken. 2005. Genomic DNA amplification from a single bacterium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:3342-3347.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    29. 29
  29. Schönhuber, W., B. Fuchs, S. Juretschko, and R. Amann. 1997. Improved sensitivity of whole-cell hybridization by the combination of horseradish peroxidase-labeled oligonucleotides and tyramide signal amplification. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:3268-3273.[Abstract]
    30. 30
  30. Vora, G. J., C. E. Meador, D. A. Stenger, and J. D. Andreadis. 2004. Nucleic acid amplification strategies for DNA microarray-based pathogen detection. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:3047-3054.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    31. 31
  31. Wagner, M., M. Horn, and H. Daims. 2003. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation for the identification and characterisation of prokaryotes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 6:302-309.[CrossRef][Medline]
    32. 32
  32. Wagner, M., M. Schmid, S. Juretschko, T. Karl-Heinz, A. Bubert, W. Goebel, and K.-H. Schleifer. 1998. In situ detection of a virulence factor mRNA and 16S rRNA in Listeria monocytogenes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 160:159-168.[CrossRef][Medline]
    33. 33
  33. Wu, L., X. Liu, C. W. Schadt, and J. Zhou. 2006. Microarray-based analysis of subnanogram quantities of microbial community DNAs by using whole-community genome amplification. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:4931-4941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    34. 34
  34. Zwirglmaier, K. 2005. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH): the next generation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 246:151-158.[CrossRef][Medline]
    35. 35
  35. Zwirglmaier, K., K. Fichtl, and W. Ludwig. 2005. In situ functional gene analysis: recognition of individual genes by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Methods Enzymol. 397:338-351.[Medline]
    36. 36
  36. Zwirglmaier, K., W. Ludwig, and K.-H. Schleifer. 2004. Recognition of individual genes in a single bacterial cell by fluorescence in situ hybridization: RING-FISH. Mol. Microbiol. 51:89-96.[CrossRef][Medline]

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2007, p. 2324-2328, Vol. 73, No. 7
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02038-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kuhn, H., Frank-Kamenetskii, M. D. (2008). Labeling of unique sequences in double-stranded DNA at sites of vicinal nicks generated by nicking endonucleases. Nucleic Acids Res 36: e40-e40 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smolina, I.
Right arrow Articles by Frank-Kamenetskii, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smolina, I.
Right arrow Articles by Frank-Kamenetskii, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Smolina, I.
Right arrow Articles by Frank-Kamenetskii, M.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»