This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chávez-Béjar, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Gosset, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chávez-Béjar, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Gosset, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chávez-Béjar, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Gosset, G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2008, p. 3284-3290, Vol. 74, No. 10
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02456-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Metabolic Engineering of Escherichia coli for L-Tyrosine Production by Expression of Genes Coding for the Chorismate Mutase Domain of the Native Chorismate Mutase-Prephenate Dehydratase and a Cyclohexadienyl Dehydrogenase from Zymomonas mobilis{triangledown}

María I. Chávez-Béjar,1 Alvaro R. Lara,2,{dagger} Hezraí López,1 Georgina Hernández-Chávez,1 Alfredo Martinez,1 Octavio T. Ramírez,2 Francisco Bolívar,1 and Guillermo Gosset1*

Departamento de Ingeniería Celular y Biocatálisis, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apdo. Postal 510-3, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62210, México,1 Departamento de Medicina Molecular y Bioprocesos, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apdo. Postal 510-3, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62210, México2

Received 31 October 2007/ Accepted 8 March 2008


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
The expression of the feedback inhibition-insensitive enzyme cyclohexadienyl dehydrogenase (TyrC) from Zymomonas mobilis and the chorismate mutase domain from native chorismate mutase-prephenate dehydratase (PheACM) from Escherichia coli was compared to the expression of native feedback inhibition-sensitive chorismate mutase-prephenate dehydrogenase (CM-TyrAp) with regard to the capacity to produce L-tyrosine in E. coli strains modified to increase the carbon flow to chorismate. Shake flask experiments showed that TyrC increased the yield of L-tyrosine from glucose (YL-Tyr/Glc) by 6.8-fold compared to the yield obtained with CM-TyrAp. In bioreactor experiments, a strain expressing both TyrC and PheACM produced 3 g/liter of L-tyrosine with a YL-Tyr/Glc of 66 mg/g. These values are 46 and 48% higher than the values for a strain expressing only TyrC. The results show that the feedback inhibition-insensitive enzymes can be employed for strain development as part of a metabolic engineering strategy for L-tyrosine production.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
L-Tyrosine (L-Tyr) is an aromatic amino acid with several applications. It is used as precursor in the synthesis of some drugs (39), biodegradable polymers (10), melanin (12), and phenylpropanoids (38). The pathway leading to L-Tyr biosynthesis starts with the condensation of phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) and erythrose-4-phosphate (E4P) in a reaction catalyzed by 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate synthase (DAHPS). Seven reactions are necessary to produce chorismate (CHA), the common precursor for the synthesis of the three aromatic amino acids (Fig. 1). For L-phenylalanine (L-Phe) and L-Tyr biosynthesis, CHA is converted to prephenate (PPA) in a reaction catalyzed by chorismate mutase (CM). In nature, there are two distinct pathways that synthesize L-Tyr. In enteric bacteria, prephenate dehydrogenase (TyrAp) catalyzes the conversion of PPA to p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate (HPP). L-Tyr is formed by transamination of HPP. In plants, PPA is converted to L-arogenate (L-AGN) by transamination. Conversion of L-AGN into L-Tyr is catalyzed by arogenate dehydrogenase (TyrAa). Zymomonas mobilis and other organisms possess enzymes called cyclohexadienyl dehydrogenases (TyrAc), which are capable of using either PPA or L-AGN as a substrate for L-Tyr biosynthesis (47). TyrAa, TyrAp, and TyrAc belong to the TyrA protein family, which includes the group containing all known dehydrogenases involved in L-Tyr biosynthesis, and use NAD+ or NADP+ or both dinucleotides as cofactors. Members of the TyrA protein family are frequently fused to other catalytic or regulatory domains. Furthermore, compounds like L-Tyr and HPP inhibit the activity of some TyrA proteins (8, 9, 40, 44). In Escherichia coli, L-Tyr inhibits the activity of three enzymes: the AroF DAHPS isozyme and 3-dehydroquinate synthase in the common aromatic pathway and the bifunctional enzyme chorismate mutase-prephenate dehydrogenase (CM-TyrAp), in the L-Tyr biosynthetic pathway (4, 35) (Fig. 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. L-Tyr biosynthetic pathways. The common aromatic pathway begins with the reaction between PEP and E4P, which yields 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate (DAHP). CHA is the branch point of the pathway. PPA is formed from CHA in a reaction catalyzed by CM. L-AGN is produced from PPA by the action of an aminotransferase (AT). L-AGN is the substrate of TyrAa or TyrAc. HPP is formed from PPA by the activity of either TyrAp or TyrAc, and HPP is transaminated by the aminotransferase. In L-Tyr biosynthetic pathways, 1 mol of NAD+ or NADP+ is used. The dashed lines indicate two or more reactions.

The general strategy used for the development of aromatic amino acid-overproducing strains has involved the alleviation of control mechanisms in key pathways (7, 41). Several different microorganisms have been modified for L-Tyr production. Corynebacterium glutamicum, Arthrobacter globiformis, and Brevibacterium lactofermentum L-Tyr-overproducing strains were developed by classical mutagenesis methods, and they were selected based on their capacity to grow on toxic aromatic amino acid analogs (20, 25, 36). Biochemical analyses of C. glutamicum strains showed that enzymes like DAHPS and CM were not inhibited by the aromatic amino acids (Fig. 1), while the TyrAa of this organism is naturally insensitive to feedback inhibition by L-Tyr (18, 21). The best C. glutamicum strain obtained by this procedure produced 26 g/liter of L-Tyr in 80 h in a fed-batch fermentation (24). Metabolic engineering and protein-directed evolution strategies have been used to construct E. coli L-Tyr-producing strains (31, 32; A. Takai, R. Nishi, Y. Joe, and H. Ito, U.S. patent application 20050277179). In these studies, feedback inhibition-resistant variants of CM-TyrAp were obtained by error-prone PCR of the encoding gene tyrA and were selected using the toxic analog 3-fluoro-DL-tyrosine. Using E. coli as a host strain, Takai et al. (U.S. patent application 20050277179) and Lütke-Eversloh and Stephanopoulos (32) constructed E. coli L-Tyr producers by overexpression of feedback inhibition-resistant variants of DAHPS and CM-TyrAp (13, 29, 31, 32; Takai et al., U.S. patent application 20050277179). One of the E. coli L-Tyr producers, which had additional central metabolism genetic modifications, produced 9.7 g/liter of L-Tyr, with an L-Tyr yield on glucose (YL-Tyr/Glc) of 0.10 g/g and an L-Tyr-specific production rate (qL-Tyr) of 73 mg/g (dry weight)/h in a fed-batch fermentation (32). Olson et al. (33) employed a different approach for construction of an E. coli L-Tyr producer. An L-Phe-producing strain, which was developed by a classical mutagenesis procedure, was converted into an L-Tyr-producing strain by replacing the native promoter of tyrA with the trc promoter. This strain produced 55 g/liter of L-Tyr, with a YL-Tyr/Glc of 0.3 g/g and a qL-Tyr of around 57 mg/g (dry weight)/h (33, 34).

The cyclohexadienyl dehydrogenase (TyrC) of Z. mobilis is not inhibited by L-Tyr or the other two aromatic amino acids (47). Due to this property, this enzyme was used recently for the development of a tunable selection system for mutant prephenate dehydratases. In this system, TyrC diverted PPA into the L-Tyr pathway to avoid the nonenzymatic conversion of PPA into phenylpyruvate in L-Phe biosynthesis (26). On the other hand, CM-prephenate dehydratase (P-protein) from E. coli is involved in L-Phe biosynthesis. When the CM domain (residues 1 to 109) of the P-protein is expressed alone (PheACM), it retains catalytic activity and becomes insensitive to L-Phe inhibition (45, 46). In contrast, the CM domain from CM-TyrAp loses its catalytic activity when it is not fused to the corresponding TyrAp domain (14).

Considering the information described above, an approach not dependent on random mutagenesis for generating a CHA-to-HPP pathway insensitive to feedback inhibition by L-Tyr was evaluated in this work. The strategy reported here was based on expressing genes encoding enzyme domains expected to be insensitive to feedback inhibition by L-Tyr. The tyrC gene from Z. mobilis, which codes for TyrC, was expressed in an E. coli strain previously modified to increase carbon flow to CHA. In addition, to reconstitute the complete CHA-to-HPP pathway, an operon was constructed with the tyrC gene and the region of the pheA gene (pheACM) that codes for the PheACM domain.

Details about the construction of plasmids pTrctyrC, pTrctyrCpheACM, and pTrctyrCpheACMINV are shown in Tables 1 and 2 and Fig. 2. In several experiments, a strain expressing the tyrA gene was used as a control. tyrA was cloned from E. coli JM101 chromosomal DNA (6) into pCR-Blunt II-TOPO to generate plasmid pTOPOtyrA. The tyrA gene was isolated from this plasmid and cloned into plasmid pTrc99A to construct pTrctyrA. The nucleotide sequences of the three genes were determined from plasmids and were found to be identical to those reported previously (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Strains and plasmids used in this study


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Sequences of the primers used in this study


Figure 2
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Construction of plasmids pTrctyrC and pTrctyrCpheACM. The tyrC gene was amplified using PCR from chromosomal DNA of Z. mobilis ATCC 3182 and cloned into plasmid pCR-Blunt II-TOPO (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) to generate plasmid pTOPOtyrC. Then the tyrC gene was obtained by digestion of pTOPOtyrC and cloned into pTrc99A (1) to generate plasmid pTrctyrC. To construct the pTrctyrCpheACM operon, the CM domain from P-protein was amplified by PCR using plasmid pTrcpheAfbr (3) as the template and cloned into pTrctyrC to generate plasmid pTrctyrCpheACM (Table 2). In plasmid pTrctyrCpheACMINV, the pheACM gene was inserted in the incorrect orientation for its expression. PDT, prephenate dehydratase domain; R, regulatory domain; RBS, ribosome binding site.

Functional complementation assays were performed with E. coli FA114 (Table 1), which lacks CM, TyrAp, and prephenate dehydratase activities. FA114 was transformed with each of the following plasmids: pTrc99A, pTrctyrA, pTrctyrCpheACM, and pTrctyrCpheACMINV (Table 1). Assays were performed at 30°C in liquid M9 minimal medium (37) supplemented with (per liter) 2 g glucose, 20 mg L-Phe, 20 mg L-tryptophan, 20 mg L-leucine, 20 mg L-isoleucine, 10 mg p-aminobenzoic acid, 10 mg p-hydroxybenzoic acid, 10 mg 2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid, 200 µg ampicillin, and 23.83 mg isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). Only the cells transformed with plasmid pTrctyrA or pTrctyrCpheACM were able to grow in minimal medium (data not shown). This experiment indicated that the genes were expressed and the enzyme activity levels of TyrC and PheACM were sufficient to give FA114 the metabolic ability to synthesize L-Tyr.

In order to determine if L-Tyr inhibited TyrC and PheACM activities, enzymatic assays were performed in the presence or absence of L-Tyr. Strain FA114/pTrctyrCpheACM was grown in LB medium with 23.83 mg/liter of IPTG and 100 mg/liter of carbenicillin. Cultures were started at an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.03 and incubated at 30°C for 12 h. Cells were washed once with lysis buffer (0.1 M Tris, 1 mM sodium EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 50 mM KCl; pH 7.5) and disrupted by sonication. PheACM activity was assayed at 30°C by following the consumption of CHA at 290 nm ({varepsilon}290 for CHA, 1.85 x 103 M–1 cm–1). TyrC activity was measured at 30°C by monitoring the appearance of NADH at 340 nm ({varepsilon}340 for NADH plus HPP, 6.4 x 103 M–1 cm–1). The reaction mixtures contained 50 mM Tris, 0.5 mM sodium EDTA, and 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (pH 7.5) at 30°C. The following concentrations of substrates were used: 2 mM NAD+, 0.2 mM PPA (for TyrC activity), and 1 mM CHA (for PheACM activity) (15, 27). Protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford method (11). One unit of TyrC activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that consumed 1 µmol of CHA per min at 30°C, and 1 U of PheACM activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that produced 1 µmol of NADH per min at 30°C. TyrC had a specific activity of 1.54 ± 0.08 IU/mg protein, while in the presence of 0.6 mM L-Tyr the specific activity was 1.34 ± 0.47 IU/mg protein. These results show that TyrC is not sensitive to L-Tyr inhibition. This is in agreement with the results obtained by Zhao et al. (47), who determined that 2 mM L-Tyr did not inhibit the activity of TyrC. Previous reports have determined that the activity of PheACM is not inhibited by L-Phe (46). However, L-Tyr was not assayed as an inhibitor, because it does not inhibit P-protein activity. To determine the possible sensitivity of the PheACM domain to L-Tyr, assays were carried out as described above. The specific activity of PheACM was 29.4 ± 5.39 IU/mg protein without L-Tyr. The specific activities with 0.6 and 1.1 mM L-Tyr were 34.4 ± 3.09 and 21.0 ± 0.23 IU/mg protein, respectively. In the case of CM-TyrAp, it has been reported that at concentrations higher than 0.5 mM, L-Tyr inhibits TyrAp activity by 90% and CM activity by 45% (23, 43). Our results showed that both TyrC and PheACM are less sensitive to L-Tyr inhibition than corresponding activities of CM-TyrAp.

The effect of expressing the aroGfbr, tyrA, tyrC, and pheACM genes on L-Tyr production was evaluated in shake flasks cultures. The aroGfbr gene codes for a feedback inhibition-resistant DAHPS mutant; its expression causes an increase in the carbon flux directed into the common aromatic amino acid pathway (3). These experiments were carried out with E. coli strain PB12, which lacks the phosphotransferase system operon genes; therefore, it does not use PEP to transport and phosphorylate glucose (19). In this way, PEP availability for aromatic biosynthesis is increased (2). PB12 was transformed with plasmid pJLBaroGfbr to generate strain PB12G. Strain PB12G was then transformed with plasmid pTrctyrA (PB12A), pTrctyrC (PB12C), or pTrctyrCpheACM (PB12CP) (Table 1). Shake flask cultures were grown at 30°C in M9 liquid medium supplemented with (per liter) 10 g glucose, 23.83 mg IPTG, 30 µg tetracycline, and 100 µg carbenicillin. Growth was monitored by measuring the OD600, and the results were converted to dry weight of cells by assuming that 1 OD600 unit was equivalent to 0.37 g/liter (22). L-Tyr and L-Phe in culture supernatants were quantified using an Agilent 1100 high-performance liquid chromatography system (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) equipped with a Phenomenex Synergy Hydro RP18 column (150 by 4.6 mm; 4 µm) attached to an Agilent 1100 electrospray mass spectrometry detection system. Samples were eluted with 10% methanol in 0.1% acetic acid in water at an isocratic flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. UV quantitation was performed at 220 nm. The mass spectrometry conditions for amino acid determination were as follows: electrospray ionization in the positive mode; fragmentor voltage, 90 V; drying gas temperature, 300°C; drying gas flow rate, 13 liters/min; capillary voltage, 4,000 V; and nebulizer pressure, 30 lb/in2. For total scans, (M+1)+ ions were detected and identified for standards and also for samples. The m/z ratios for L-Phe and L-Tyr are 166 and 182, respectively. The glucose content was determined from culture supernatants using an enzymatic analyzer (2700 biochemistry analyzer; YSI, Yellow Springs, OH.).

Compared with PB12G, PB12A had a qL-Tyr and a YL-Tyr/Glc that were 1.6- and 1.1-fold higher, respectively. On the other hand, the qL-Tyr for PB12C and PB12CP were 6.8- and 5.8-fold higher, respectively, than the values for PB12A (Fig. 3 and Table 3). Compared with PB12A, PB12C and PB12CP had YL-Tyr/Glc that were 6.6- and 6.4-fold higher, respectively. These results showed that overexpression of wild-type tyrA (CM-TyrAp) resulted in only a small increase in the L-Tyr production capacity in a strain already expressing a feedback inhibition-resistant version of DAHPS. On the other hand, expression of tyrC resulted in a significant increase in L-Tyr production, and no further enhancement was observed when both tyrC and pheACM were expressed. These results showed that expression of a feedback inhibition-insensitive variant of DAHPS is sufficient to cause E. coli to overproduce L-Tyr. This capacity was not increased considerably by overexpression of CM-TyrAp, most likely because it is subject to feedback inhibition by L-Tyr. This regulatory constraint was overcome in the strains expressing feedback inhibition-insensitive TyrC protein, resulting in a large increase in L-Tyr production. The observed differences in L-Tyr production between PB12A and PB12C indicated that the conversion of PPA to HPP is a limiting step in the pathway that can be overcome by introducing the activity of a feedback inhibition-insensitive TyrA protein, like TyrC.


Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. Results of the shake flask experiments. {blacktriangledown}, PB12G; {blacksquare}, PB12A; {blacklozenge}, PB12C; •, PB12CP.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Kinetic and stoichiometric parameters determined in shake flask experimentsa

To further characterize the best L-Tyr-producing strains, PB12C and PB12CP were grown using media and fermentation conditions similar to those employed for biotechnological processes. Cultures were grown in 1-liter bioreactors (BioFlo 110 modular fermentor system; New Brunswick Scientific, New Jersey). Operation parameters were controlled by the AFS-Biocommand bioprocessing software (New Brunswick Scientific, New Jersey). The culture conditions were as follows: working volume, 0.6 liter; temperature, 37°C; airflow rate, 0.6 liter/min; dissolved oxygen level maintained above 30% air saturation by increasing the stirrer speed (500 to 1200 rpm); and pH controlled at 7.0 by addition of 15% NH4OH. The culture medium contained (per liter) 50 g glucose, 6 g Na2HPO4, 3 g KH2PO4, 5 g (NH4)2SO4, 2 g sodium citrate·2H2O, 10 g yeast extract, 1.5 g MgSO4·7H2O, 550 mg CaCl2, 40 mg thiamine-HCl, 30 µg tetracycline, 100 µg carbenicillin, and 23.83 mg IPTG. A trace element solution contained (per liter) 8.74 µg Na-EDTA·2H2O, 1.55 µg CoCl2·6H2O, 9.30 µg MnCl2, 0.93 µg CuCl2, 1.30 µg Na2MoO4·2H2O, 20.96 µg zinc acetate·H2O, 62.49 µg Fe(III) citrate, and 1.86 µg H3BO3. The cell glucose, L-Tyr, and L-Phe contents were determined as described above. Acetic acid, 3-dehydroshikimic acid (DHS), and shikimic acid (SHIK) were quantified as described elsewhere (3). L-Tyr is insoluble in water at concentrations above 0.4 g/liter at neutral pH; for this reason, 1-ml portions of fermentation samples were treated with 50 µl of 6 N HCl, mixed, and incubated 30 min at 42°C, samples were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm to remove the cells (Eppendorf 5410), and supernatants were filtered and diluted for high-performance liquid chromatography analysis.

After 21 and 27 h of incubation, strains PB12C and PB12CP reached final biomass concentrations of 13.9 ± 0.8 and 11.1 ± 2.1 g (dry weight)/liter, respectively. Differences in several parameters related to L-Tyr production were observed between these strains (Table 4). PB12CP, which expresses the tyrC and pheACM genes, produced an L-Tyr titer that was 46% higher than that of PB12C. For PB12CP the amount of L-Tyr produced per gram (dry weight) of cells and the YL-Tyr/Glc were 85 and 48% higher than the values for PB12C, respectively. The YL-Tyr/Glc for PB12C and PB12CP corresponded to 7.7 and 11.9%, respectively, of the maximum theoretical yield (0.553 g/g) (32). Finally, the qL-Tyr for PB12CP was 36% higher than that for PB12C. Under these culture conditions, strain PB12CP displayed the highest L-Tyr yields and titer. Based on these results, it is clear that a strain expressing both tyrC and pheACM is a better L-Tyr producer than a strain expressing only tyrC. However, considering the results observed in shake flask experiments, the positive effect of expressing both tyrC and pheACM appears to be dependent on the culture conditions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 4. Parameters determined from data generated in bioreactor experiments using strains PB12C and PB12CP

Metabolites of L-Phe and common aromatic pathways were also measured (L-Phe, DHS, and SHIK) (Fig. 1 and Table 4). L-Phe was not detected in culture supernatants from either of the two strains (data not shown). On the other hand, accumulation of DHS and SHIK in the culture medium indicated the presence of rate-limiting steps in the common aromatic pathway (3, 16, 30). This suggests that the TyrC and PheACM enzymes efficiently compete for carbon with the L-Phe pathway. The amounts of L-Tyr produced by PB12C and PB12CP represent 45 and 42%, respectively, of the sum of the amounts of the measured metabolites (DHS, SHIK, and Tyr). Finally, acetic acid was not detected in culture supernatants. Strains with an inactive phosphotransferase system display very low acetic acid production, even with elevated glucose concentrations (28).

Previous studies of microbial production of L-Tyr employed classical mutagenesis methods for the generation of strains that overproduce this amino acid. More recently, mutagenesis of genes encoding specific enzymes that are feedback inhibited by L-Tyr has proven to be a successful approach for generating production strains. Despite the utility of these approaches, their application involves a requirement to generate and screen a large number of mutants to find strains with an increased capacity to overproduce L-Tyr (or L-Phe) or feedback inhibition-resistant enzymes that retain their catalytic activity. In this work, we took advantage of the natural diversity in the TyrA family of enzymes and designed a rational strategy to overcome feedback inhibition regulation in the L-Tyr pathway in E. coli. TyrC from Z. mobilis is not inhibited by L-Tyr; thus, by expressing TyrC in E. coli it was possible to reduce considerably the negative control that L-Tyr exerts in its terminal pathway. Our results showed that this approach greatly increased carbon flow to the L-Tyr pathway. On the other hand, in enzymatic assays it was found that the PheACM domain of P-protein was weakly inhibited by L-Tyr. In bioreactor cultures it was determined that expression of this domain increases the L-Tyr production capacity in a strain also expressing TyrC. The strains generated in this study are not final production strains; they can be further improved with additional genetic alterations. If all the metabolic bottlenecks in the common aromatic pathway could be alleviated, it would be possible to increase the amount L-Tyr produced by PB12C and PB12CP twofold. The modifications needed to meet this goal are overexpression of the aroL and ydiB genes in the common aromatic pathway (30; Takai et al., U.S. patent application 20050277179). In addition, it should be possible to further improve these strains by expression of the tktA gene to increase E4P availability (17) and by inactivation of the transcriptional regulator TyrR (32; Takai et al., U.S. patent application 20050277179). The approach described here is one of the strategies that can be used to eliminate the regulation in the L-Tyr biosynthetic pathway, with the purpose of producing L-Tyr and compounds derived from L-Tyr. Finally, the results obtained in this study show that a metabolic engineering strategy, based on the utilization of natural diversity, is a viable rational alternative to approaches based on random mutagenesis.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported in part by CONACyT grants D432432 and 44126. María I. Chávez-Béjar was supported by fellowships from CONACyT and DGEP/UNAM.

We thank Roy Jensen for critically reading the manuscript and Joel Osuna from Instituto de Biotecnología/Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México for the gift of E. coli FA114. We thank Mercedes Enzaldo and Shirley Ainsworth for technical assistance.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (U.N.A.M.), Apdo. Postal 510-3, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62210, México. Phone: 52-777-3291601. Fax: 52-777-3172388. E-mail: gosset{at}ibt.unam.mx Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 14 March 2008. Back

{dagger} Present address: Departamento de Procesos y Tecnología, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Cuajimalpa, México City, México. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Amann, E., B. Ochs, and K. J. Abel. 1988. Tightly regulated tac promoter vectors useful for the expression of unfused and fused proteins in Escherichia coli. Gene 69:301-315.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. 2
  3. Báez, J. L., F. Bolívar, and G. Gosset. 2001. Determination of 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate productivity and yield from glucose in Escherichia coli devoid of the glucose phosphotransferase transport system. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 73:530-535.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. 3
  5. Báez-Viveros, J. L., J. Osuna, G. Hernández-Chávez, X. Soberón, F. Bolívar, and G. Gosset. 2004. Metabolic engineering and protein directed evolution increase the yield of L-phenylalanine synthesized from glucose in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 87:516-524.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. 4
  7. Barker, J. L., and J. W. Frost. 2001. Microbial synthesis of p-hydroxybenzoic acid from glucose. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 76:376-390.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. 5
  9. Bessette, P. H., F. Aslund, J. Beckwith, and G. Georgiou. 1999. Efficient folding of proteins with multiple disulfide bonds in the Escherichia coli cytoplasm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:13703-13708.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. 6
  11. Bolívar, F., R. L. Rodríguez, P. J. Greene, M. C. Betlach, H. L. Heyneker, and H. W. Boyer. 1977. Construction and characterization of new cloning vehicles. II. A multipurpose cloning system. Gene 2:95-113.[Medline]
  12. 7
  13. Bongaerts, J., M. Kramer, U. Muller, L. Raeven, and M. Wubbolts. 2001. Metabolic engineering for microbial production of aromatic amino acids and derived compounds. Metab. Eng. 3:289-300.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. 8
  15. Bonner, C. A., T. Disz, K. Hwang, J. Song, V. Vonstein, R. Overbeek, and R. A. Jensen. 2008. Cohesion group approach for evolutionary analysis of TyrA, a protein family with wide-ranging substrate specificities. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 72:1-42.[Free Full Text]
  16. 9
  17. Bonner, C. A., R. A. Jensen, J. E. Gander, and N. O. Keyhani. 2004. A core catalytic domain of the TyrA protein family: arogenate dehydrogenase from Synechocystis. Biochem. J. 382:279-291.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. 10
  19. Bourke, S. L., and J. Kohn. 2003. Polymers derived from the amino acid L-tyrosine: polycarbonates, polyarilates and copolymers with poly(ethylene glycol). Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 55:447-466.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. 11
  21. Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248-254.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. 12
  23. Cabrera-Valladares, N., A. Martínez, S. Piñero, V. H. Lagunas-Muñoz, R. Tinoco, R. de Anda, R. Vázquez-Duhalt, F. Bolívar, and G. Gosset. 2006. Expression of the melA gene from Rhizobium etli CFN42 in Escherichia coli and characterization of the encoded tyrosinase. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 38:772-779.[CrossRef]
  24. 13
  25. Chávez-Béjar, M. I., G. Gosset, A. Martínez, and F. Bolívar. 2008. Microbial production of L-tyrosine and derived compounds: a review. In F. Columbus (ed.), Biotechnology and bioengineering trends, in press. Nova Science Publishers, New York, NY.
  26. 14
  27. Chen, S., S. Vincent, D. B. Wilson, and B. Ganem. 2003. Mapping of chorismate mutase and prephenate dehydrogenase domains in the Escherichia coli T-protein. Eur. J. Biochem. 270:757-763.[Medline]
  28. 15
  29. Davidson, B. E., and G. S. Hudson. 1987. Chorismate mutase-prephenate dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli. Methods Enzymol. 142:440-450.[Medline]
  30. 16
  31. Dell, K. A., and J. W. Frost. 1993. Identification and removal of impediments to biocatalytic synthesis of aromatics from D-glucose: rate-limiting enzymes in the cimmon pathway of aromatic amino acid biosynthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115:11581-11589.[CrossRef]
  32. 17
  33. Draths, K. M., D. L. Pompliano, D. L. Conley, J. W. Frost, A. Berry, G. L. Disbrow, R. J. Staversky, and J. C. Lievense. 1992. Biocatalytic synthesis of aromatics from D-glucose: the role of transketolase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 14:620-623.
  34. 18
  35. Fazel, A. M., and R. A. Jensen. 1979. Obligatory biosynthesis of L-tyrosine via the pretyrosine branchlet in coryneform bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 138:805-815.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. 19
  37. Flores, N., J. Xiao, A. Berry, F. Bolívar, and F. Valle. 1996. Pathway engineering for the production of aromatic compounds in Escherichia coli. Nat. Biotechnol. 14:620-623.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. 20
  39. Hagino, H., and K. Nakayama. 1973. L-Tyrosine production by analog-resistant mutants derived from a phenylalanine auxotroph of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Agric. Biol. Chem. 39:2013-2023.
  40. 21
  41. Hagino, H., and K. Nakayama. 1975. The biosynthetic control in aromatic amino acid producing mutants of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Agric. Biol. Chem. 39:351-361.
  42. 22
  43. Hernández-Montalvo, V., F. Valle, F. Bolívar, and G. Gosset. 2001. Characterization of sugar mixtures utilization by an Escherichia coli mutant devoid of the phosphotransferase system. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 57:186-191.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. 23
  45. Hudson, G. S., G. J. Howlett, and B. E. Davidson. 1983. The binding of tyrosine and NAD+ to chorismate mutase/prephenate dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli K12 and the effects of these ligands on the activity and self-association of the enzyme. Analysis in terms of a model. J. Biol. Chem. 258:3114-3120.[Free Full Text]
  46. 24
  47. Ikeda, M., and R. Katsumata. 1992. Metabolic engineering to produce tyrosine or phenylalanine in a tryptophan-producing Corynebacterium glutamicum strain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:781-785.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. 25
  49. Ito, H., S. Sakurai, and T. Tanaka. 1990. Genetic breeding of L-tyrosine producer Brevibacterium lactofermentum. Agric. Biol. Chem. 54:699-705.[Medline]
  50. 26
  51. Kleeb, A. C., M. H. Edalat, M. Gamper, J. Haugstetter, L. Giger, M. Neuenschwander, P. Kast, and D. Hilvert. 2007. Metabolic engineering of a genetic selection system with tunable stringency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:13907-13912.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. 27
  53. Koch, G. L., D. C. Shaw, and F. Gibson. 1971. The purification and characterisation of chorismate mutase-prephenate dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli K12. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 229:795-804.[Medline]
  54. 28
  55. Lara, A. R., L. Caspeta, G. Gosset, F. Bolívar, and O. T. Ramírez. 2008. Utility of an Escherichia coli strain engineered in the substrate uptake system for improved culture performance at high glucose and cell concentrations: an alternative to fed-batch cultures. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 99:893-901.[CrossRef]
  56. 29
  57. Lütke-Eversloh, T., C. N. Santos, and G. Stephanopoulos. 2007. Perspectives of biotechnological production of L-tyrosine and its applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 77:751-762.[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. 30
  59. Lütke-Eversloh, T., and G. Stephanopoulos. 2008. Combinatorial pathway analysis for improved L-tyrosine production in Escherichia coli: identification of enzymatic bottlenecks by systematic gene overexpression. Metab. Eng. 10:69-77.[Medline]
  60. 31
  61. Lütke-Eversloh, T., and G. Stephanopoulos. 2005. Feedback inhibition of chorismate mutase/prephenate dehydrogenase (TyrA) of Escherichia coli: generation and characterization of tyrosine-insensitive mutants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:7224-7228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. 32
  63. Lütke-Eversloh, T., and G. Stephanopoulos. 2007. L-Tyrosine production by deregulated strains of Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 75:103-110.[CrossRef][Medline]
  64. 33
  65. Olson, M. M., L. J. Templeton, W. Suh, P. Youderian, F. S. Sariaslani, A. A. Gatenby, and T. K. Van Dyk. 2007. Production of tyrosine from sucrose or glucose achieved by rapid genetic changes to phenylalanine-producing Escherichia coli strains. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 74:1031-1040.[CrossRef][Medline]
  66. 34
  67. Patnaik, R., R. R. Zolandz, D. A. Green, and D. F. Kraynie. 2008. L-Tyrosine production by recombinant Escherichia coli: fermentation optimization and recovery. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 99:741-752.[CrossRef]
  68. 35
  69. Pittard, A. 1987. Biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids, vol. 1. ASM, Washington, DC.
  70. 36
  71. Roy, A., S. K. Murkhopadhyay, and S. P. Chatterjee. 1997. Production of tyrosine by auxotrophic analogue resistant mutants of Arthrobacter globiformis. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 56:727-733.
  72. 37
  73. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  74. 38
  75. Sariaslani, F. S. 2007. Development of a combined biological and chemical process for production of industrial aromatics from renewable resources. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 61:51-69.[Medline]
  76. 39
  77. Seetharam, G., and B. Saville. 2002. L-DOPA production from tyrosinase inmobilized in zeolite. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 31:747-753.[CrossRef]
  78. 40
  79. Song, J., C. A. Bonner, M. Wolinsky, and R. A. Jensen. 2005. The TyrA family of aromatic-pathway dehydrogenases in phylogenetic context. BMC Biol. 3:13.[CrossRef][Medline]
  80. 41
  81. Sprenger, G. 2006. Aromatic amino acids, p. 94-127. In V. F. Wendisch (ed.), Microbiology monograph. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
  82. 42
  83. Reference deleted.
  84. 43
  85. Turnbull, J., and J. F. Morrison. 1990. Chorismate mutase-prephenate dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli. 2. Evidence for two different active sites. Biochemistry 29:10255-10261.[CrossRef][Medline]
  86. 44
  87. Xie, G., C. A. Bonner, and R. A. Jensen. 2000. Cyclohexadienyl dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas stutzeri exemplifies a widespread type of tyrosine-pathway dehydrogenase in the TyrA protein family. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C 125:65-83.
  88. 45
  89. Zhang, S., G. Pohnert, P. Kongsaeree, D. B. Wilson, J. Clardy, and B. Ganem. 1998. Chorismate mutase-prephenate dehydratase from Escherichia coli. Study of catalytic and regulatory domains using genetically engineered proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 273:6248-6253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  90. 46
  91. Zhang, S., D. B. Wilson, and B. Ganem. 2003. An engineered chorismate mutase with allosteric regulation. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 11:3109-3114.[CrossRef][Medline]
  92. 47
  93. Zhao, G., T. Xia, L. O. Ingram, and R. A. Jensen. 1993. An allosterically insensitive class of cyclohexadienyl dehydrogenase from Zymomonas mobilis. Eur. J. Biochem. 212:157-165.[Medline]


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2008, p. 3284-3290, Vol. 74, No. 10
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02456-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Li, P.-P., Liu, Y.-J., Liu, S.-J. (2009). Genetic and biochemical identification of the chorismate mutase from Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microbiology 155: 3382-3391 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chávez-Béjar, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Gosset, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chávez-Béjar, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Gosset, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chávez-Béjar, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Gosset, G.