Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, June 2008, p. 3410-3418, Vol. 74, No. 11
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.00366-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Institut für Molekulare Mikrobiologie und Biotechnologie,1 Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster, Germany2
Received 13 February 2008/ Accepted 4 April 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
-amino group (45). CGP is a polydispersed polymer; the molecular size distribution of CGP varies with the producing host strains (1, 15, 18, 20, 30, 37, 52). Due to its branched structure, CGP is not degradable by a wide range of proteinases (45). Biosynthesis of CGP from aspartate and arginine requires only one enzyme, cyanophycin synthetase, which is encoded by cphA (51). CGP is insoluble at neutral pH and under physiological ionic strength, but it is soluble at low (>3) or high (<9) pH. Ziegler et al. were the first to observe a water-soluble form of CGP after the heterologous expression of cphA from Desulfitobacterium hafniense strain DSM 10664 in Escherichia coli (52). A detailed study of the solubility behavior of CGP isolated from recombinant E. coli in inorganic salts has been carried out by Füser and Steinbüchel (16). It was shown that the occurrence of the soluble form was not dependent on the origin of cphA or on the host. Recently, several putative applications for CGP and its derivatives have become available, indicating there is a need for its efficient biotechnological production (36, 42, 43). For the production of CGP at a technical scale, cyanobacteria were shown to be unsuitable due to their low cell densities and polymer contents (3.5% [wt/wt]) and slow growth and circumstantial growth conditions in a photobioreactor (18, 19). In contrast, much higher amounts of the polymer were produced with the heterotrophic bacterium Acinetobacter baylyi strain ADP1 (46% [wt/wt]) (14) and with recombinant strains of E. coli (24% [wt/wt] [15] and 34.5% [wt/wt] [21], respectively). Also, in the industrially relevant bacteria Pseudomonas putida, Ralstonia eutropha, and Corynebacterium glutamicum, considerable amounts of CGP could be produced after heterologous expression of cphA (3, 13, 48, 49). Recently, CGP production was also achieved for the first time in eukaryotic organisms. Transgenic tobacco plants accumulated up to 1.14% (wt/wt) and transgenic potato plants up to 0.24% (wt/wt) of water-soluble and water-insoluble CGP (37).
In the last century, yeasts have evolved into biotechnologically relevant production organisms for several products in industry. First, yeast systems that were developed for heterologous gene expression were based on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This organism is traditionally used for large-scale production of baker's yeast and ethanol, with a considerable increase in the production of fuel ethanol in the last 3 decades (4, 6, 50). Additionally, this platform has been successfully applied to the production of valuable heterologous proteins on an industrial scale (26, 35), such as various FDA-approved pharmaceuticals, including insulin (34) and hepatitis B surface antigen (23). Yeast-based expression systems excel because of their available constitutive or strongly inducible promoters and their growth to high cell densities on inexpensive substrates. The range of today's established yeast expression systems includes S. cerevisiae, Kluyveromyces lactis, Pichia pastoris, Yarrowia lipolytica, Arxula adeninivorans, and Hansenula polymorpha (8, 17). Polymers such as human collagen and recombinant gelatin have also been produced successfully in several yeast strains (7, 12, 38, 47). The present study describes for the first time the expression of a cyanophycin synthetase gene and the successful production of CGP in yeast. These experiments emphasize the potential for biotechnological production of CGP in these industrially relevant organisms.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Strains and plasmids used in this study
|
General DNA techniques.
Isolation of plasmids from E. coli was carried out using the alkaline lysis method described by Sambrook et al. (40). For DNA endonuclease digestion, standard ligation and agarose gel electrophoresis protocols were used (40). For the recovery of DNA fragments after electrophoresis, an Eppendorf Perfectprep gel clean-up kit was used by following the manufacturers instructions. Sequences of constructs were verified by capillary DNA sequencing (Universitätsklinikum, Münster, Germany). Isolation of total DNA from transgenic yeast was performed according to a method described by Kaiser et al. (29). For verification of the presence of cphA6308, PCRs with specific oligonucleotides (5'-AAAAGGATCCACTATGAAAATCCTCAAAACACAAACCC-3' and 5'-TTTGTCGACCTATTCACTACTGAGATGATATTTCTCAATCATC-3') as primers and with total DNA from transgenic yeasts as templates were carried out.
Cloning of cphA.
For cloning cphA6308 into the E. coli-yeast shuttle vectors pESC-URA and pYEX-BX (Table 1), PCR was done with Pfx DNA polymerase (Gibco BRL) according to the manufacturer's instructions, by using the oligonucleotides cphA-fw-BamHI (5'-AAAGGATCCACTATGAAAATCCTCAAAACACAAACCC-3') as the sense and cphA-rw-SalI (5'-TTTGTCGACCTATTCACTACTGAGATGATATTTCTCAATCATC-3') as the reverse primers. Thereby, an artificial Kozak site (underlined) upstream of the start codon, a BamHI restriction site in the upstream region and a SalI restriction site in the downstream region of cphA6308, were introduced. Plasmid pET-23a::cphA6308 (Table 1) was used as the template. Subsequently, the PCR products were cloned into the BamHI-SalI-treated E. coli-yeast shuttle vectors, yielding pESC-URA::cphA6308 and pYEX-BX::cphA6308, respectively.
Cell disruption and determination of CDM.
Yeast cells were harvested by using a bench centrifuge (5 min, 3,000 rpm, 4°C), and cell pellets were washed once with saline (0.9% [wt/vol] NaCl). For determination of the cell dry matter (CDM), pellets were lyophilized, and the cell mass was determined gravimetrically. For cell disruption, the cell pellet was resuspended in 1 ml buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5]) per g of fresh or dry cell mass and disrupted for 5 min by a bead mill (type MM 301; Retsch, Haan, Germany). Soluble cell fractions were obtained by centrifugation of crude cell extracts (10 min, 13,000 rpm, 4°C).
Determination of protein concentrations.
Protein concentrations were determined using the methods described by Bradford (10) and Lowry et al. (32). Soluble cell fractions were used for the determination and were obtained as described above.
Cyanophycin synthetase assay.
The cyanophycin synthetase enzyme assay followed the procedure described by Aboulmagd et al. (1). Soluble cell fractions and crude cell extracts were used to determine the enzyme activity. Scintillation counting was carried out using a model LS 6500 scintillation counter (Beckman Instruments GmbH, München, Germany).
Isolation of CGP.
For the isolation of CGP, yeast cells were disrupted as described above. The crude cell extract obtained after cell disruption was centrifuged for 10 min at 13,000 rpm at 4°C. The supernatant was used for the isolation of water-soluble CGP by applying a modified method described by Ziegler et al. (52), using heat treatment, proteinase K digestion, and precipitation with 3 volumes of ethanol. After samples were subjected to proteinase K digestion, they were applied to Vivaspin 20 concentrators (Vivascience AG, Hannover, Germany), with a 10-kDa membrane to remove low-molecular-weight substances. CGP was subsequently precipitated with ethanol and washed once with acetone. Water-insoluble CGP was isolated from the cell debris by resuspending the sample in 0.1 M HCl. After the suspension was centrifuged (15 min, 13,000 rpm), the supernatant was neutralized by adding NaOH. After another centrifugation step, the polymer was obtained from the pellet and washed twice with demineralized water and lyophilized to determine the dry weight. Isolation of CGP from E. coli BL21(DE3)(pET-23a::cphA6308) was performed as described by Frey et al. (15).
Characterization of CGP.
The amino acid constituents of the water-soluble and water-insoluble CGP isolated from the transgenic yeasts G175(pESC-URA::cphA6308), G175(pYEX-BX::cphA6308), and BY4741(pYEX-BX::cphA6308) were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (1). Calibration was done with samples from an amino acid reference kit (Kollektion AS-10 from Serva Feinbiochemica, Heidelberg, Germany).
Electrophoretic methods.
Analysis of polymers by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was performed in 11.5% (wt/vol) acrylamide gels according to the method described by Laemmli (31). Prestained standard molecular weight proteins were purchased from Fermentas; the applied mixture contained β-galactosidase from E. coli (117 kDa), bovine serum albumin from bovine plasma (90 kDa), ovalbumin from chicken egg white (49 kDa), carbonic anhydrase from bovine erythrocytes (35 kDa), β-lactoglobulin from bovine milk (26 kDa), and lysozyme from chicken egg white (19 kDa). Proteins and CGP-like material were stained with Serva Blue R. Protein concentrations were determined as described by Hartree (24).
Immunological methods.
For the preparation of anti-CGP antiserum, cells of E. coli TOP10(pSK::cphAco) (Table 1) were grown in LB medium under ampicillin selection (100 µg/ml). After the cells were harvested by centrifugation for 15 min at 4°C, they were washed once with 0.9% (wt/vol) NaCl and disrupted by using a French pressure cell with 1,000 mPa (Amicon, Silver Spring, MD). Subsequently, CGP was isolated according to the method described by Simon (44). Purified CGP (100 mg/ml) was used for the generation of custom polyclonal antibodies in rabbits by Eurogentec (Seraing, Belgium). The immunoglobulin G (IgG) fraction was purified by affinity chromatography using protein A-Sepharose CL-4B (27). To purify anti-CGP-specific IgG, CGP was blotted onto a Hybond-P membrane (Amersham Biosciences). The membrane was incubated in 2.5% (wt/vol) skim milk in TBS buffer (8% [wt/vol] NaCl; 2% [vol/vol] Tris/HCl [pH 7.6]) for 1 h. After the membrane was washed three times for 10 min each in TBS, 400 µl of the IgG solution from protein A chromatography was added. After a 3-h incubation, the membrane was washed again, and anti-CGP-specific IgGs were eluted with 1 ml of elution buffer (5 mM glycine [pH 3], 0.5 M NaCl, 0.05% [vol/vol] Tween 20), neutralized with 1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0), and stored at –20°C. For immunological detection of CGP, proteins and CGP were transferred from gels onto Hybond-P membranes as described by the manufacturer (Amersham Biosciences). Immunological analysis was performed as described in reference 25 with slight modifications, employing anti-CGP-specific IgGs (diluted 1:100 in TBS buffer). Dot blot experiments were performed as described by the manufacturer of the polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). IgGs were visualized on immunoblots by using anti-rabbit IgG-alkaline phosphatase conjugates (Sigma-Aldrich), converting 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate dipotassium nitrotetrazolium blue chloride (Sigma-Aldrich) into a dark insoluble product.
Isolation of RNA and RT-PCR.
For isolation of RNA, yeast cells were grown in 5 ml of selective medium under induced conditions. Therefore, cells harboring the vector pESC-URA::cphA6308 were grown in minimal medium with 2% (wt/vol) galactose as the inducer for the GAL1 promoter and the carbon source, and cells harboring pYEX-BX::cphA6308 were grown in minimal medium containing 0.1 mM CuSO4 as the inducer for the CUP1 promoter and 2% (wt/vol) glucose as the carbon source. Cells were harvested (3 min, 5,000 rpm) and broken by treatment in a bead mill (type MM 301; Retsch, Haan, Germany). RNA was isolated by using an RNeasy mini-kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as described by the manufacturer. After RNA was isolated, the remaining DNA was hydrolyzed by DNaseI (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) during an incubation of 45 min at 37°C. To determine if the cphA gene was transcribed in the transgenic yeast cells, reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was performed as described by the manufacturer (OneStep RT-PCR kit; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), using cphA-specific oligonucleotides (5'-GCCATCGCTGATGTCGGTGG-3' and 5'-CGATGGCAATACCCCCGGTAC-3') as the primers and 0.5 ng RNA as the template. DNA controls were carried out to exclude any DNA contamination.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies.
Cells were fixed with 2.5% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.3) for 45 min. After the cells were washed three times with PBS for 20 min each, they were postfixed in 1% (wt/vol) osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.3) and washed once with PBS for 20 min. Then, the water was removed by using a graded water/ethanol series (30, 50, 70, 90, and 96%, and absolute ethanol) in which each step lasted about 15 min. To obtain thin sections, the samples were embedded in Spurr resin without propylene oxide (46). Sections with a thickness of 70 to 80 nm were cut with an ultramicrotome (Leica Mikroskopie und Systeme, Wetzlar, Germany) by using a diamond knife and were placed on a 200-mesh copper grid. Subsequently, the sections were stained with saturated uranyl acetate solution for 30 min and with a lead citrate solution according to the method described by Reynolds (39) for 3 min. Imaging was performed with an H-500 model TEM (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) in the brightfield mode at an acceleration voltage of 80 kV at room temperature.
|
|
|---|
Transcriptional analysis of transgenic yeast for cphA.
For expression experiments, cells of transgenic yeasts harboring the plasmid pESC-URA::cphA6308 were grown in minimal medium containing 2% (wt/vol) galactose as the sole carbon source and as the inducer for the GAL1 promoter. In contrast, cells of the transgenic yeasts harboring plasmid pYEX-BX::cphA6308 were grown in minimal medium containing 2% (wt/vol) glucose as the carbon source and 0.1 mM CuSO4 as the inducer for the CUP1 promoter. To determine whether cphA6308 is transcribed in the transgenic yeast cells, RNA was isolated, and RT-PCR was performed. All the obtained transgenic yeasts that were transformed with cphA-containing plasmids showed cphA-specific PCR products, in contrast to that of the DNA control, indicating that cphA is transcribed in these cells (data not shown). Negative controls (strains G175 and BY4741 harboring only the vectors) were also analyzed; they did not show cphA-specific PCR products.
Analysis of CphA enzyme activity in transgenic yeasts.
CphA enzyme activity was measured in soluble cell fractions obtained from S. cerevisiae strains G175 and BY4741 harboring pESC-URA::cphA6308, pYEX-BX::cphA6308, or the respective vector controls by employing a radiometric assay. The disintegrations per minute (dpm) were determined to be below 75 dpm for vector controls and the strains BY4741 and G175 harboring pESC-URA::cphA6308, indicating the absence of significant CphA enzyme activity and that pESC-URA::cphA6308 did not confer considerable CphA activity on the strains. In contrast, measurements in soluble cell fractions of strains BY4741 or G175 harboring pYEX-BX::cphA6308 gave 756 or 931 dpm, respectively. Soluble cell fractions from E. coli strain BL21(DE3) harboring pET-23a::cphA6308 were used as positive controls and gave 9,420 dpm. These data clearly demonstrated that pYEX-BX::cphA6308 conferred CphA enzyme activity on both of the investigated yeast strains. Unfortunately, it was not possible to calculate real specific enzyme activities because protein concentrations could not be measured accurately due to the presence of CGP. The presence of CGP in protein samples affected the total protein concentration when it was determined by the Bradford method (10) or that of Lowry et al. (32). CGP gave higher protein values if determined with the Bradford reagent and quencher values if determined with the Lowry reagent, as revealed by standard curves (Fig. 1). Therefore, the real protein values could only be estimated and had to be carefully considered. After the isolation of soluble CGP, the polymer was solubilized in buffer, and the "protein" concentration of this solution was determined according to the Bradford method; the value obtained was subtracted from the protein concentration determined for the respective soluble cell fraction. The values obtained were used to calculate specific enzyme activities, which were 2.00, 0.91, and 0.76 U/mg protein for E. coli BL21(DE3)(pET-23a::cphA6308), S. cerevisiae G175(pYEX-BX::cphA6308), and S. cerevisiae BY4741(pYEX-BX::cphA6308), respectively. Specific activities for vector controls and yeasts harboring pESC-URA::cphA6308 were below 0.02 U/mg protein.
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Standard curves for protein analysis employing BSA ( ), soluble CGP ( ), and a mixture of BSA and CGP (). The substances were applied in concentrations of 0 to 100 µg/ml and were solubilized in water. (A) Determination according to the Bradford method (10). (B) Determination according to the method described by Lowry et al. (32). Linear equations are given in the graphs.
|
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Analysis and detection of CGP isolated from cells of recombinant strains of S. cerevisiae and E. coli and from cyanobacteria. (A) Yeast cell extracts were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (left) and Western blotting (right). Acidic extracts were obtained by resuspension of cell debris in 0.1 M HCl and centrifugation. Proteinase K fractions were obtained by digestion of soluble cell fractions with proteinase K. In each lane, 10 to 20 µg CGP was applied. Lanes 1 to 4 represent crude extracts from yeast: 1, BY4741 harboring pYEX-BX; 2, BY4741 harboring pYEX-BX::cphA6308; 3, G175 harboring pYEX-BX: 4, G175 harboring pYEX-BX::cphA6308. Lanes 5 to 8 represent soluble and insoluble CGP from yeast: 5, acidic extract from BY4741 harboring pYEX-BX::cphA6308; 6, proteinase K fraction from BY4741 harboring pYEX-BX::cphA6308: 7, acidic extract from G175 harboring pYEX-BX::cphA6308; 8, proteinase K fraction from G175 harboring pYEX-BX::cphA6308. (B) CGP isolated from E. coli BL21(DE3)(pET-23a::cphA6308) and from Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6308 was analyzed by SDS-PAGE (left) and by immunological detection in Western blotting (right) using anti-CGP IgGs. In each lane, 10 µg CGP was applied. M, protein marker; lane 1, CGP from recombinant E. coli; lane 2, CGP from Synechocystis sp. (C) Acidic fractions and proteinase K fractions from S. cerevisiae analyzed by dot blot employing anti-CGP IgGs. Lanes 1, 3 and 5, acidic fractions; 2, 4 and 6, proteinase K fractions. Lanes: 1 and 2, G175 harboring pYEX-BX; 3 and 4, G175 harboring pYEX-BX::cphA6308; 5 and 6, BY4741 harboring pYEX-BX::cphA6308. CGP (30 µg) was applied for cphA-harboring strains.
|
Subsequently, the anti-CGP antibodies were applied to crude extracts prepared from transgenic yeasts cells and also to purified CGP isolated from these yeast cells (Fig. 2A). In the applied crude extracts, only CGP and no distinct protein molecules gave an immunoreaction, indicating that anti-CGP IgGs bound specifically to CGP molecules and not to other proteins (Fig. 2A). A strong immunoreaction occurred with insoluble CGP isolated from yeast as it was also observed for CGP isolated from the cells of E. coli or Synechocystis sp. Surprisingly, no immunoreaction at all occurred with the soluble CGP isolated from yeast (Fig. 2A). Due to the solubility behavior of this CGP form, blotting was also carried out by applying three membranes instead of one, to exclude the possibility that soluble CGP passed the first membrane during blotting and was therefore not detectable. However, no immunoreaction occurred on any of the three membranes (data not shown). In addition, dot blot experiments were carried out to confirm the observation that the anti-CPG antibodies used do not react with soluble CGP (Fig. 2C). Obviously, the results obtained in this experiment were the same as those in the Western blotting analysis; therefore, it was concluded that an immunoreaction occurred with insoluble CGP but not with soluble CGP (Fig. 2A and C) and that these antibodies can be used to discriminate between the two forms.
Determination of the amino acid composition.
As observed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2A), the transgenic yeasts produced two different types of CGP which are significantly distinguishable by their solubility behavior and their reaction with the anti-CGP antibodies. Both types were isolated by different procedures, as described in Materials and Methods. HPLC analysis of the two CGP types revealed that both types of CGP isolated from the same cells exhibited the same amino acid compositions. CGP isolated from either the BY4741 or the G175 strain, respectively, consisted mainly of aspartic acid or arginine, which occurred at molar fractions of 52 or 46%, respectively. Lysine was detected at a maximum fraction of only 2 mol%.
Microscopy analysis of transgenic yeast.
For the visualization of CGP granules in cells of S. cerevisiae strain G175 harboring pESC-URA::cphA6308, phase-contrast light microscopy and electron microscopy were applied (Fig. 3B and D). S. cerevisiae strain G175 harboring pESC-URA was analyzed for comparison in parallel (Fig. 3A and C). Both strains were grown in minimal media containing 2% (wt/vol) galactose as the sole carbon source for 48 h at 30°C. From cells of cphA-carrying strains, water-soluble and water-insoluble forms of CGP were isolated in amounts similar to those described above (soluble CGP amounted to about 2% of the cell dry mass; insoluble CGP amounted to <0.1% of the cell dry mass). Since both strains showed weak light-scattering granules by light microscopy (Fig. 3C and D), electron microscopy views should have elucidated where the CGP was deposited in the cells. The micrographs revealed black areas in all investigated cells (Fig. 3A and B). Cells of strain G175 harboring pYEX-BX::cphA6308 showed stronger light-scattering inclusions in several cells (Fig. 3E and F).
![]() View larger version (79K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Microscopy examinations of transgenic S. cerevisiae cells. TEM (A and B) and light microscopy (C, D, E, and F) pictures of S. cerevisiae G175 harboring pESC-URA (A and C) and of S. cerevisiae G175 harboring pESC-URA::cphA6308 (B and D) are shown. Cells were cultivated in minimal medium containing 2% (wt/vol) galactose and harvested after 48 h. Thin sections were prepared, and electron micrographs were obtained for TEM as described in Materials and Methods. (E) A light microscopy picture of S. cerevisiae G175 harboring pYEX-BX::cphA6308 grown in minimal medium containing 2% (wt/vol) glucose and 0.1 mM CuSO4 and harvested after 48 h is shown. (F) A light microscopy picture of S. cerevisiae G175 harboring pYEX-BX::cphA6308 is shown; cells were cultivated in minimal medium containing 2% (wt/vol) glucose and 0.4 mM CuSO4 and harvested after 48 h. Bars A and B, 2 µm; bars C to F, 4 µm.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Cell dry weights and CGP contents determined from cultivations under different conditionsa
|
|
|
|---|
Immunological analyses showed that the generated anti-CGP IgGs were highly specific to CGP isolated from various organisms (Fig. 2). However, no immunoreaction occurred with water-soluble CGP synthesized by transgenic yeast (Fig. 2A). This observation was surprising as the chemical structure of this form of CGP has been reported to be identical to the water-insoluble form (16, 52); also, our analysis did not reveal any differences (data not shown). Presumably, relevant groups or regions in the CGP molecule that are recognized by the antibodies are disguised, resulting in an inability of the IgGs to bind to the soluble form. Eventually these disguised residues could also be the cause for the solubility of CGP, which is not fully elucidated yet (16). About 6 µg of CGP could be detected with Western blotting. However, this was not the real detection limit as CGP did not form a distinct band on the gel but was instead dispersed over a wide area on the gel due to its polydispersity. Nevertheless, the antibodies generated provide a suitable tool for the detection of insoluble CGP from different organisms. The molecular mass distributions of CGP was between 20 and 35 kDa for the soluble CGP and between 26 and 45 kDa for the insoluble CGP and was similar to distributions observed with recombinant bacteria and plants (3, 15, 37). In contrast, in cyanobacteria, the apparent molecular masses were much higher, ranging up to 130 kDa (18).
An interesting aspect was the amino acid composition of the isolated CGP. CphA6308 has been described as having a broad substrate range in vitro (2) and incorporates up to 10 mol% of lysine, replacing arginine in the side chain of CGP, when it is expressed in E. coli (30). In contrast, CGP isolated from the natural host Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6308 is composed of aspartic acid and arginine only (5). Without a variation in the medium composition, S. cerevisiae produced CGP with a maximum fraction of only 2 mol% of lysine. However, an increase in the amount of lysine, up to 10 mol%, was detected when 15 mM of lysine was added to the media; this composition correlated with that observed by Krehenbrink et al. (30).
Light microscopy investigations of cells harboring pESC-URA::cphA6308 did not reveal the presence of CGP granules as they did with A. baylyi strain ADP1 or with recombinant E. coli strains (14, 15). Also, electron microscopy views did not visualize CGP granules in the yeast cells, which usually appear as black areas in the cells (14). However, such areas were widespread in the yeast strains harboring cphA and also in the negative control. As the investigated yeast strains produced mainly soluble CGP and less than 0.1% of the insoluble form, which occurs as granules, CGP could not be visualized by this method in yeast. Only S. cerevisiae strain G175 harboring pYEX-BX::cphA6308 showed, to a larger extent, light-scattering inclusions which might be CGP granules (Fig. 3E and F).
Determination of the cell densities of transgenic yeasts harboring cphA6308 yielded lower values than the negative controls without cphA, thereby indicating that the synthesis and accumulation of CGP resulted in slower growth. Such an inhibition due to CGP biosynthesis was recently reported in transgenic plants, too (37). However, a total CGP content of almost 7%, which was obtained without having varied the cultivation conditions, is still high in comparison to that of CGP-producing plants or some recombinant strains of C. glutamicum and P. putida (3, 37). Through slight modifications of the cultivation conditions, the CDM average was increased 1.5-fold for strains harboring pYEX-BX::cphA6308, and interestingly, soluble CGP was no longer produced when the CGP constituents aspartate and arginine were added to the medium. This observation could be useful for the directed production of one form of CGP.
These experiments concerning the production of CGP in S. cerevisiae clearly indicated that CGP synthesis can be conferred to yeast and that these microorganisms are therefore putative candidates for the biotechnical production of CGP in the future. However, the CGP contents of the cells need to be enhanced. This could be achieved, for example, by using stronger induction systems, by engineering the metabolism of yeasts, and by varying the cultivation conditions. A chromosomal integration of cphA in yeast would probably be especially advantageous, thereby allowing the use of technical, low-cost media instead of specific minimal media. In addition, the use of other yeasts such as P. pastoris and H. polymorpha (17), which have become increasingly interesting for biotechnical purposes because they exhibit high levels of productivity and because they can be grown to high cell densities, could be applied in the future.
This project was supported by a grant (EOSLT02034) from SenterNovem (Utrecht, The Netherlands).
Published ahead of print on 11 April 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»