Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Solem, C. Articles by Martinussen, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Solem, C. Articles by Martinussen, J. Agricola Articles by Solem, C. Articles by Martinussen, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2008, p. 4772-4775, Vol. 74, No. 15
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.00134-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Plasmid pCS1966, a New Selection/Counterselection Tool for Lactic Acid Bacterium Strain Construction Based on the oroP Gene, Encoding an Orotate Transporter from Lactococcus lactis

Christian Solem, Els Defoor, Peter Ruhdal Jensen, and Jan Martinussen^*

Center for Systems Microbiology, Department for Systems Biology, Building 301, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark

Received 15 January 2008/ Accepted 18 March 2008

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Construction of a... Use of the... REFERENCES

 
In this paper we describe the new selection/counterselection vector pCS1966, which is suitable for both sequence-specific integration based on homologous recombination and integration in a bacteriophage attachment site. This plasmid harbors oroP, which encodes a dedicated orotate transporter, and can replicate only in Escherichia coli. Selection for integration is performed primarily by resistance to erythromycin; alternatively, the ability to utilize orotate as a pyrimidine source in a pyrimidine auxotrophic mutant could be utilized. Besides allowing the cell to utilize orotate, the transporter renders the cell sensitive to 5-fluoroorotate. This sensitivity is used to select for loss of the plasmid. When expressed from its own promoter, oroP was toxic to E. coli, whereas in Lactococcus lactis the level of expression of oroP from a chromosomal copy was too low to confer 5-fluoroorotate sensitivity. In order to obtain a plasmid that confers 5-fluoroorotate sensitivity when it is integrated into the chromosome of L. lactis and at the same time can be stably maintained in E. coli, the expression of the oroP gene was controlled from a synthetic promoter conferring these traits. To demonstrate its use, a number of L. lactis strains expressing triosephosphate isomerase (tpiA) at different levels were constructed.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Construction of a... Use of the... REFERENCES

 
Construction of tailor-made strains is dependent on efficient genetic methods, and in order to obtain genetically stable strains, chromosomal integration is often desirable. This calls for techniques that allow efficient selection of both chromosomal integration and excision. For many years, plasmids unable to replicate but expressing antibiotic resistance in Lactococcus lactis have been used to obtain strains in which the plasmid has been integrated into the chromosome. Whereas the isolation of integrants was straightforward, strains that had lost the plasmid were not as easy to obtain. A genetic tool based on a plasmid whose replication is impaired at high temperatures has been used extensively to obtain chromosomal insertions and deletions in L. lactis (2). While the integration is dependent on selection for antibiotic resistance at a nonpermissive temperature, the excision step relies on lowering the temperature to the permissive temperature, taking advantage of the growth inhibition resulting from initiation of rolling circle replication from the plasmid origin located on the chromosome (2). Besides inducing genetic instability, a disadvantage of this system is that the nonpermissive temperature is 37°C, which is at the limit for growth of a number of lactococcal strains. A gene involved in nucleotide metabolism has been demonstrated to work as a counterselection marker; loss of the upp gene encoding uracil phosphoribosyltransferase results in resistance to 5-fluorouracil (3, 14, 15). The main drawbacks of using upp are that this gene is found in almost every organism and that 5-fluorouracil may be toxic even in a upp mutant (14, 15).

L. lactis synthesizes pyrimidines de novo, but it is also able to metabolize various exogenous pyrimidine nucleosides and nucleobases (12). The de novo pyrimidine pathway consists of six steps leading to the formation of UMP (10). Orotate is the fourth intermediate in the pathway, and it has been shown that this compound cannot be utilized by most L. lactis strains as a pyrimidine source because the strains lack a transporter (7, 10). After screening a number of L. lactis strains, we isolated one strain that was able to take up orotate due to the presence of plasmid pDBORO encoding a dedicated orotate transporter. The oroP gene identified on the plasmid was shown to confer the ability to utilize orotate as a sole pyrimidine source in an auxotrophic mutant, and the presence of this gene results in sensitivity to the toxic analogue 5-fluoroorotate (7). These findings suggested that the oroP gene can be exploited as an efficient selection/counterselection marker. Moreover, it was found that oroP was functionally expressed in both Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, suggesting that it can be utilized as a selection/counterselection marker in wide range of bacteria (7, 13). When the oroP allele was introduced into the chromosome of L. lactis, no significant 5-fluoroorotate sensitivity was acquired, whereas when the same oroP allele was localized on the chromosome of B. subtilis, the cells became sensitive to 5-fluoroorotate, thus making the original allele suitable for genetic recombination on the B. subtilis chromosome (7). In this paper we describe pCS1966, a new vector harboring the oroP gene suitable for obtaining chromosomal recombination in L. lactis using selection in the presence of erythromycin or orotate and counterselection in the presence of 5-fluoroorotate.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Construction of a... Use of the... REFERENCES

 
Like most integration vectors for bacteria other than E. coli, pLB85 is based on a plasmid that is able to replicate only in E. coli (4). During attempts to clone the oroP gene it was observed that a derivative of the L. lactis integration vector pLB85 in which the oroP gene was inserted could not be established in E. coli. This was probably due to expression of the oroP gene, which encodes a membrane protein, that was too high (data not shown). On the other hand, when this plasmid was introduced into the chromosome of L. lactis, no 5-fluoroorotate sensitivity was acquired (data not shown), whereas when the same oroP allele was localized on a plasmid, the cell became sensitive to 5-fluoroorotate (7). This indicated that the oroP promoter is relatively strong in E. coli and relatively weak in L. lactis, which is actually opposite the properties required for a selection/counterselection tool for L. lactis. We therefore decided to see whether modulating the strength of the oroP promoter using a synthetic promoter library resulted in a derivative with reduced expression in E. coli and, simultaneously, increased expression in L. lactis. In order to meet the requirement for integration of the vector alone in the chromosome of L. lactis, plasmid pCS1861 was created. The bacteriophage TP901-1 attachment site attP (6) was amplified by PCR from pLB85 using primers AttP-F and AttP-R and, after digestion with NotI and SacI, fused to plasmid pRC1 (11) linearized with the same enzymes. After transformation into E. coli ABLE-C (Stratagene), which was E. coli C lac(LacZ^–) [Kan^r McrA^– McrCB^– McrF^– Mrr^– HsdR (r_k^– m_k^–)] [F' proAB lacI^qZM15 Tn10(Tet^r)], the resulting plasmid, pCS1861, was selected on LB medium containing 150 µg/ml erythromycin. We routinely use ABLE-C, which lowers the copy number of ColE1 derivatives, to reduce cloning problems due to toxicity of cloned fragments in E. coli. A PCR fragment in which a promoter library expressing oroP was generated by PCR using primers 105 and 106 (Table 1). A mixture of PCR fragments was digested with SpeI and SalI and ligated into pCS1861. Several hundred E. coli ABLE-C transformants were obtained on LB medium supplemented with 150 µg/ml erythromycin. The transformants were washed off the plates and used to inoculate liquid LB medium supplemented with erythromycin. The mixed culture was allowed to grow for at least 10 generations in order to enrich for strains that grew well. Plasmid DNA was extracted and used for electroporation (8) in order to transform the L. lactis pyrimidine-requiring derivative ED79.1175 (pyrDa pyrDb) (7). To ensure that the plasmid integrated at the bacteriophage TP901-1 attachment site, ED79.1175 was transformed in advance with plasmid pLB65 (4), which encodes the integrase from TP901-1 (6). In order to obtain an integrant that harbored an allele of oroP that was sufficiently expressed in L. lactis, the transformants were plated on chemically defined SA medium (9) supplemented with 1% glucose and with 20 µg/ml orotate as a sole pyrimidine source. A number of transformants were obtained, and their dependence on orotate for growth was confirmed by restreaking on the defined medium in the absence and presence of orotate. The plasmids from the integrated strains were recreated by PCR amplifying a fragment containing the synthetic promoter and the oroP gene using chromosomal DNA isolated from the orotate-positive strains as the template and primers CPOro-F and CPOro-R (Table 1). After digestion with SacI, the fragments were inserted into pCS1861 by ligation and transformed into E. coli ABLE-C. Plasmid DNA was purified and used to transform L. lactis MG1363 harboring pLB65. Transformants were selected on M17 plates supplemented with 1% glucose and 5 µg/ml erythromycin. The strains were screened on SA medium supplemented with 1% glucose and 10 µg/ml 5-fluoroorotate. Among the transformants found to be sensitive to 5-fluoroorotate, plasmid pCS1966 (Fig. 1) was chosen for further study. The DNA upstream of oroP in pCS1966 was sequenced, and the putative promoter was identified (Fig. 1). A 4-bp deletion between the –35 and –10 boxes in the promoter sequence was observed. Normally, the space between the two elements is 17 bp long, and therefore the consensus –35 sequence (TTGACA) is probably not involved in primary promoter recognition; instead, the highly degenerate TTCTTG sequence may serve as the initial RNA polymerase binding site (Fig. 1). This could account for the poor expression in E. coli. For L. lactis the fact that this promoter is stronger than the wild-type promoter could indicate that the original oroP promoter is extremely weak.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Primers used in this study

View larger version (22K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Selection/counterselection vector pCS1966. The oroP gene encodes the orotate transporter expressed from the synthetic promoter obtained by selection (SP-oroP). The ermAM gene confers erythromycin resistance. The attP gene is the attachment site from bacteriophage TP901-1. Unique restriction enzyme sites are indicated. The sequence of the promoter driving the expression of oroP is shown at the top. The designed consensus –35 and –10 sequences are underlined, and the alternative –35 sequence is indicated by shading.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Construction of a... Use of the... REFERENCES

 
To test the usefulness of pCS1966, it was used to construct a number of L. lactis subsp. lactis IL-1403 (5) strains with synthetic promoters upstream of the tpiA gene encoding triosephosphate isomerase. Plasmid pCS2055 was constructed by inserting the tpiA upstream region generated by PCR with primers TpiUp-F and Tpi-R1 (Table 1) between the XhoI and BamHI sites in the oroP vector pCS1966. Chromosomal DNA was isolated from four strains containing synthetic promoter plasmids integrated into the tpiA locus and expressing tpiA at different levels (C. Solem, unpublished), and a PCR fragment was generated using primers T7 and Tpi-R2 (Table 1). The resulting PCR fragments were digested with BamHI and XbaI and cloned in pCS2055 containing the tpiA upstream region (Fig. 2). The four plasmids were amplified in E. coli ABLE-C, purified, and used to transform L. lactis IL-1403. Strains in which the plasmids were integrated into the chromosome were obtained on M17 plates supplemented with glucose and erythromycin as the plasmids did not replicate in L. lactis. Integration occurred by homologous recombination either at the tpiA open reading frame or at the upstream sequence (Fig. 2). The transformants were purified and plated on SA glucose plates supplemented with 5-fluoroorotate (10 µg/ml), thereby selecting for strains in which the plasmid had been lost by homologous recombination. The recombination may have taken place either at the tpiA open reading frame or at the upstream sequence (Fig. 2). In both cases the plasmid was lost, leaving either the wild-type or the synthetic promoter upstream of the tpiA open reading frame. Among the 5-fluoroorotate-resistant strains, the clones expressing tpiA from a synthetic promoter were identified by PCR. Finally, to verify that the different strains expressed tpiA at different levels, the triosephosphate isomerase levels were assayed using crude extracts made from the strains growing exponentially in SA medium. The crude extracts were prepared as described by Andersen et al. (1), except that the cells were disrupted with glass beads. As shown in Table 2, the enzymatic activities did vary, as expected.

View larger version (19K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. Scheme for exploitation of the oroP-based selection/counterselection vector pCS1966 for construction of strains expressing the tpiA gene encoding triosephosphate isomerase from synthetic promoters. (A) A derivative of pCS1966 carrying the ylfE-tpiA region from L. lactis IL-1403 in which the normal promoter has been replaced by a synthetic promoter is subject to homologous recombination in IL-1403. The recombination takes place at either yleF (recombination 1) or tpiA (recombination 2). The integration is selected by erythromycin resistance. (B) Outcome of the recombination involving interaction between the yleF genes (recombination 1). A second recombination event involving either yleF (recombination 3) or tpiA (recombination 4) results in excision of a plasmid. Only strains with plasmids excised are viable in the presence of 5-fluoroorotate. When the recombination involves yleF (recombination 3), the integration is reversed, resulting in regeneration of the wild type. (C) Result of excision by a recombination event at tpiA (recombination 4). The wild-type and synthetic promoters are indicated by arrows and designated wt and SP, respectively. ermAM confers erythromycin resistance, attP is the attachment site from bacteriophage TP901-1, and oroP encodes the orotate transporter from L. lactis. The XhoI and BamHI restriction enzyme sites are indicated.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Relative triosephosphate isomerase activities in derivatives of L. lactis IL-1403

We concluded that the pCS1966 vector described in this paper can be used as an efficient tool for strain construction. As the oroP gene is functionally expressed in different bacteria, including L. lactis, E. coli, and B. subtilis, the counterselection procedure using 5-fluoroorotate described in this work can potentially be exploited in a large number of organisms. However, the strain must be devoid of an orotate transporter. If an orotate transporter is present, a derivative lacking this ability can easily be obtained by selection on plates containing 5-fluoroorotate.

 
This work was supported by grants from the Danish Agricultural and Veterinary Research Council and the Danish Centre for Advanced Food Studies.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Center for Systems Microbiology, Department of Systems Biology, Building 301, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark. Phone: 45 45 25 24 98. Fax: 45 45 88 26 60. E-mail: jma{at}biocentrum.dtu.dk

Published ahead of print on 6 June 2008.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Construction of a... Use of the... REFERENCES

 

1
1. Andersen, H. W., C. Solem, K. Hammer, and P. R. Jensen. 2001. Twofold reduction of phosphofructokinase activity in Lactococcus lactis results in strong decreases in growth rate and in glycolytic flux. J. Bacteriol. 183:3458-3467.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
2. Biswas, I., A. Gruss, S. D. Ehrlich, and E. Maguin. 1993. High-efficiency gene inactivation and replacement system for gram-positive bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 175:3628-3635.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3
3. Breuner, A., L. Brondsted, and K. Hammer. 1999. Novel organization of genes involved in prophage excision identified in the temperate lactococcal bacteriophage TP901-1. J. Bacteriol. 181:7291-7297.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Brondsted, L., and K. Hammer. 1999. Use of the integration elements encoded by the temperate lactococcal bacteriophage TP901-1 to obtain chromosomal single-copy transcriptional fusions in Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:752-758.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Chopin, A., M. C. Chopin, A. Moillo-Batt, and P. Langella. 1984. Two plasmid-determined restriction and modification systems in Streptococcus lactis. Plasmid 11:260-263.[CrossRef][Medline]
6
6. Christiansen, B., M. G. Johnsen, E. Stenby, F. K. Vogensen, and K. Hammer. 1994. Characterization of the lactococcal temperate phage TP901-1 and its site-specific integration. J. Bacteriol. 176:1069-1076.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7
7. Defoor, E., M. B. Kryger, and J. Martinussen. 2007. The orotate transporter encoded by oroP from Lactococcus lactis is required for orotate utilization and has utility as a food-grade selectable marker. Microbiology 153:3645-3659.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8
8. Holo, H., and I. F. Nes. 1995. Transformation of Lactococcus by electroporation. Methods Mol. Biol. 47:195-199.[Medline]
9
9. Jensen, P. R., and K. Hammer. 1993. Minimal requirements for exponential growth of Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:4363-4366.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10
10. Kilstrup, M., K. Hammer, J. P. Ruhdal, and J. Martinussen. 2005. Nucleotide metabolism and its control in lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 29:555-590.[CrossRef][Medline]
11
11. Le Bourgeois, P., M. Lautier, M. Mata, and P. Ritzenthaler. 1992. New tools for the physical and genetic mapping of Lactococcus strains. Gene 111:109-114.[CrossRef][Medline]
12
12. Martinussen, J., P. S. Andersen, and K. Hammer. 1994. Nucleotide metabolism in Lactococcus lactis: salvage pathways of exogenous pyrimidines. J. Bacteriol. 176:1514-1516.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13
13. Martinussen, J., and E. M. C. Defoor. February 2005. Novel recombinant marker gene encoding orotate transporter polypeptide, useful as selection maker, screening marker, counter-selection marker or bi-directional marker for identifying and/or selecting cells. Danish patent no. WO2005078106-A1.
14
14. Martinussen, J., and K. Hammer. 1994. Cloning and characterization of upp, a gene encoding uracil phosphoribosyltransferase from Lactococcus lactis. J. Bacteriol. 176:6457-6463.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15
15. Martinussen, J., and K. Hammer. 1995. Powerful methods to establish chromosomal markers in Lactococcus lactis—an analysis of pyrimidine salvage pathway mutants obtained by positive selections. Microbiology 141:1883-1890.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

---

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2008, p. 4772-4775, Vol. 74, No. 15
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.00134-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Solem, C. Articles by Martinussen, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Solem, C. Articles by Martinussen, J. Agricola Articles by Solem, C. Articles by Martinussen, J.