Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2008, p. 5146-5152, Vol. 74, No. 16
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.00944-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth, 9-2 Kizugawadai, Kizugawa, Kyoto 619-0292, Japan
Received 25 April 2008/ Accepted 16 June 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The initiation of transcription is the pivotal step for gene regulation in eubacteria (41). The sigma factor of RNA polymerase is responsible for promoter recognition and determines the specificity of transcriptional initiation. There are seven genes coding for sigma factors in the genome of C. glutamicum: sigA, sigB, sigC, sigD, sigE, sigH, and sigM (14, 19, 43). Group 1 sigma factor SigA is the primary sigma factor, essential for cell viability and responsible for the transcription of housekeeping genes. The sigB gene encodes a group 2 sigma factor, which shows a high degree of sequence similarity with the primary sigma factor but is nonessential for cell growth. SigC, SigD, SigE, SigH, and SigM are classified into the category of extracytoplasmic function sigma factors, which are divergent from group 1 and 2 sigma factors in amino acid sequence and control the transcription of genes that are involved in response to extracellular environmental signals.
In gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, the group 2 sigma factor RpoS is induced during entry into stationary phase and under many stress conditions and plays an important role in cell adaptation by controlling expression of a large set of genes under nonoptimal growth conditions (9, 10). RpoS and the primary sigma factor RpoD of E. coli are known to recognize the same promoter sequence in vitro but have distinct regulons in vivo. Up to 10% of the E. coli genes are under direct or indirect control of RpoS, and RpoS is considered a second vegetative sigma factor with a major impact not only on stress tolerance but also on the whole-cell physiology (39). In C. glutamicum and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, SigB is suggested to play roles similar to those of RpoS, since it is induced during the transition from exponential phase to stationary phase and under some stress conditions, and the sigB disruptant has increased susceptibility to various stress (5, 6, 12, 18, 25). Recently, genes under the control of SigB of C. glutamicum during the transition from exponential phase to stationary phase have been identified by DNA microarray analysis (22). SigB regulates expression of genes involved in various cellular functions, and its promoter sequence is indistinguishable from that of SigA.
We have previously shown that the sigB transcript level is increased under conditions of oxygen deprivation (17). In this study, we found that the glucose consumption rate was lowered in a sigB disruptant under these conditions. DNA microarray and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analyses indicated that SigB positively regulated expression of genes involved in glucose metabolism under conditions of oxygen deprivation. Moreover, sigB disruption had extensive effects on gene expression not only in the growth-arrested cells under conditions of oxygen deprivation but also in cells during aerobic exponential growth. SigB of C. glutamicum is suggested to be a global regulator at various stages of cellular growth.
|
|
|---|
Mutant construction.
The sigB coding region was amplified by PCR using the primer pair 1749-F and 1749-R (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) and cloned between the SmaI and Sse8387I sites of pHSG398 (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan). A kanamycin resistance cassette from pUC4K (GE Healthcare Bio-Science, NJ) was inserted into the unique BamHI site that lay within the sigB gene. The resulting plasmid was transferred by electroporation into C. glutamicum to generate a sigB-disrupted strain, DR1749. Disruption of the sigB gene was confirmed by PCR (data not shown).
For a complementation study, a shuttle vector pCRD600 harboring the sigB gene was constructed. A DNA fragment containing the sigB promoter and coding regions was amplified by PCR using the primer pair sigB-F and sigB-R (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) and was cloned between the PstI and EcoRI sites of pCRB1 (16).
RNA isolation and DNA microarray analysis.
Total RNA was extracted from C. glutamicum cells by using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as described previously (17) and was treated with DNase I (Takara Bio).
Global gene expression analysis was performed with the C. glutamicum R DNA microarray (17). Fluorescently labeled cDNAs were prepared with 10 µg RNA by using the CyScribe cDNA postlabeling kit (GE Healthcare Bio-Science). Synthesis and labeling of cDNA, as well as hybridization, washing and scanning of microarrays, and image analysis followed protocols described previously (17). Microarray analyses were carried out using three sets of RNA samples isolated from independently grown cultures with different combinations of Cy dyes (a dye swap strategy). Since the C. glutamicum R DNA microarray contains two replicates per gene, a total of six replicates per gene were available to determine changes in gene expression. Genes with significantly differential transcript levels (P < 0.01 [Student's t test]) by at least a factor of 2 were determined.
Real-time qRT-PCR.
A one-step real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed with 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, CA) in a 20-µl reaction mixture containing 10 µl Power Sybr green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems), 0.1 µM each of gene-specific forward and reverse primers (see Table S1 in the supplemental material), 5 U of murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Applied Biosystems), and total RNA. An aliquot of 1 ng of total RNA was used for the experiment with 16S rRNA, and 100 ng of total RNA was used for the others. Reaction conditions were 50°C for 30 min and then 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 30 s. Relative ratios were normalized with the value for 16S rRNA and are represented as means of triplicates.
Enzyme assays.
Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 15,000 x g at 4°C for 5 min, washed once with extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 1 mM dithiothreitol, 2 mM EDTA), and suspended in 1 ml of extraction buffer. The cells were disrupted with a sonicator (Bioruptor UCD-250; Cosmo Bio, Tokyo, Japan) in a water bath at 4°C for 30 min with a 50% duty cycle (on for 5 s and then off for 5 s). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 15,000 x g at 4°C for 5 min, and the supernatant was used as a crude extract for enzyme assays. Protein concentrations were determined with a protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, CA) by using bovine serum albumin as the standard.
Enzyme activities, in a final volume of 0.5 ml, were monitored at 340 nm and 33°C with a spectrophotometer (DU800; Beckman Coulter, CA). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) activity was assayed as described previously (27) with some modifications. Assays were performed at pH 7.5 with 5 mM glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate. Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (FBP) aldolase (FBA) assays were performed in a reaction mixture containing 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM KCl, 0.1 mM MnCl2, 0.2 mM NADH, 0.5 U triosephosphate isomerase (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), 0.5 U glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Roche Diagnostics), and 20 mM FBP. Although GAPDH is encoded by the gapA and gapB genes, gapA is solely responsible for the glycolytic GAPDH activity (27).
Extraction and estimations of intracellular metabolite concentration.
For the measurement of intracellular metabolites, 100 µl of cell suspension was rapidly taken into a sample tube with 1.0 ml cold methanol (–80°C). In this procedure, cell metabolism was stopped quickly and intracellular metabolites were simultaneously extracted to the methanol solution (40). After being incubated for 60 min at –20°C, the sample solution was centrifuged at 15,000 x g at 4°C for 5 min, and 700 µl of the resulting supernatant was mixed vigorously with 700 µl of chloroform and 350 µl of water. An aliquot of the upper methanol-water layer (50 µl) was mixed with 50 µl of water or standard mixture solution (5.0 µM each), was evaporated for 45 min with the integrated SpeedVac system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA), and then was redissolved in 100 µl of water. Aliquots (10 µl) were used for analysis with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. All analyses were carried out with a Prominence20A high-performance liquid chromatography system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) coupled with a 4000 Q TRAP linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems/MDS Sciex). Intracellular metabolites were analyzed by ion-pairing reversed-phase liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry with 5 mM dibutylammonium acetate (Tokyo Chemical Industry, Tokyo, Japan) as described by Luo et al. (24).
Analytical methods.
Cell suspensions were centrifuged at 15,000 x g at 4°C for 5 min, and the resulting supernatants were used for analyses of glucose and organic acids. Glucose concentrations were determined by an enzyme electrode glucose sensor (BF-4; Oji Scientific Instruments, Hyogo, Japan). Organic acid concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography as described previously (20). Cell growth was monitored by measuring the absorbance at 610 nm by using a spectrophotometer (Novaspec II; GE Healthcare Bio-Science).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (8K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Time course of glucose consumption of C. glutamicum strain R (filled circles) and the sigB disruptant (open circles) under conditions of oxygen deprivation. Experiments were repeated eight times, and representative data are shown.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Organic acid production rates of C. glutamicum R and the sigB disruptant under conditions of oxygen deprivation
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. sigB disruption-induced changes in expression of genes involved in glucose metabolism
|
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Glucose metabolism pathway in C. glutamicum under conditions of oxygen deprivation. The depicted scheme was predicted based on the studies of Inui et al. (16) and Yasuda et al. (42) and the KEGG PATHWAY Database (http://www.genome.ad.jp/kegg/pathway.html). Genes and reactions catalyzed by their products are shown. Relative ratios of the transcript levels in DR1749 to WT determined by qRT-PCR analyses are shown under the gene names. Data are means ± standard deviations for three independent experiments. Arrows with bold, solid lines and dotted lines indicate genes upregulated and downregulated by the sigB disruption, respectively. Data of qRT-PCR analyses for the sdhC gene are represented as those for the sdhCAB operon. G6P, glucose-6-phosphate; F6P, fructose-6-phosphate; GAP, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; DHAP, dihydroxyacetone phosphate; BPG, 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate; 3PG, 3-phosphoglycerate; 2PG, 2-phosphoglycerate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; PYR, pyruvate; OAA, oxaloacetate; Acetyl-P, acetyl phosphate.
|
Accumulation of FBP in the sigB disruptant.
Intracellular concentrations of glycolytic intermediates under conditions of oxygen deprivation were quantified in the WT and DR1749. Table 3 shows the ratio of the concentration of each intermediate in DR1749 to its concentration in the WT. Only the FBP levels of all intermediates quantified in this study were significantly changed by the sigB disruption. The intracellular concentration of FBP increased about threefold in DR1749 (Table 3).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Effects of the sigB disruption on intracellular concentrations of glycolytic intermediates under conditions of oxygen deprivation
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Changes in the transcript levels of genes involved in glucose metabolism during aerobic cultivation. The relative transcript levels of pfkA (A), fba (B), tpi (C), gapA (D), pgk (E), eno (F), ppc (G), fum (H), and pqo (I) at exponential phase (white bars), at transition from exponential phase to stationary phase (light gray bars), and at stationary phase (dark gray bars) in the WT and DR1749 were determined by qRT-PCR. The transcript levels were determined in triplicate using two independently grown cultures. The transcript level at exponential phase in the WT was taken as 1. (J) Growth curves of C. glutamicum strain R (filled circles) and the sigB disruptant (open triangles) during aerobic cultivation. Cells were harvested at 3 h (exponential phase), 6 h (transition phase), and 12 h (stationary phase). Arrows indicate sampling points.
|
Promoter sequences of glucose metabolism genes downregulated by sigB disruption.
We found that nine glucose metabolism genes were downregulated by sigB disruption (Fig. 2 and 3). The promoter sequences of these genes have been determined previously (7, 8, 34, 36, 38). The gapA, pgk, tpi, and ppc genes are cotranscribed from the promoters upstream of the gapA and pgk genes (36). Alignment of the promoter sequences of these genes provides the consensus sequence tAnAAT for the –10 region and cgGCaa for the –35 region (Fig. 4A). The consensus sequence for the –10 region was comparable to that suggested to be recognized by SigA of C. glutamicum (TAtaaT), while the –35 regions were different for promoters recognized by SigB and SigA (ttGcca) (29).
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Promoter sequences of glucose metabolism genes downregulated (A) and not downregulated (B) by the sigB disruption under conditions of oxygen deprivation. The upstream sequences of 50 nt from the transcription initiation site experimentally determined previously (4, 7, 8, 17, 30, 33-36, 38) are indicated. The nucleotides conserved among all and more than 70% of the sequences are shaded in black and gray, respectively. The consensus sequences of –10 and –35 regions are determined by the BioProspector program (23) and are given at the bottom. Consensus sequences where >70% and 50% of nucleotides are conserved are indicated by uppercase and lowercase letters, respectively.
|
|
|
|---|
Under conditions of oxygen deprivation, NADH is oxidized to NAD+ by the action of NAD-dependent dehydrogenases, such as lactate dehydrogenase (encoded by ldhA) and malate dehydrogenase (encoded by mdh), and the glucose consumption rate is correlated to the intracellular NADH/NAD+ ratio in C. glutamicum (16). Alteration of metabolic pathways from glucose to organic acids by disruption of a gene involved in the production of either lactate or succinate suppresses NADH oxidation, and the resulting increase in the NADH/NAD+ ratio reduces the GAPDH activity, which is highly susceptible to a high NADH/NAD+ ratio (2), with subsequent reduction of the glucose consumption rate. For the sigB disruptant, the transcript levels of ppc, fum, and pqo, which are involved in succinate and acetate production, were decreased (Fig. 2), and lactate, succinate, and acetate production rates were reduced to different extents (Table 1). Although the metabolic flow from glucose to organic acids was altered by the sigB disruption, the intracellular NADH/NAD+ ratio was not affected. Thus, it is unlikely that the NADH/NAD+ ratio is primarily responsible for the retardation of glucose consumption by the sigB disruption. On the other hand, among the intracellular glucose metabolites examined, the concentration of FBP was significantly increased by disruption of the sigB gene (Table 3), a result which was consistent with the reduced levels of fba transcripts and the FBA activity (Table 2; see Results). We enhanced the FBA activity of DR1749 3.8-fold with a plasmid harboring the fba gene (data not shown). However, the glucose consumption rate of DR1749 with the enhanced FBA activity was 4.2 ± 0.2 mmol h–1 g dry cells–1, which is comparable to that of DR1749 (4.1 ± 0.5 mmol h–1 g dry cells–1). These results indicate that the depressed FBA activity is not solely responsible for the reduced rate of glucose consumption in DR1749. Extensive decreases in the transcript levels of glucose metabolism genes may contribute to the reduced rate of glucose consumption in the sigB disruptant.
The consensus sequences of the –10 and –35 promoter regions of the glucose metabolism genes regulated by SigB were tAnAAT and cgGCaa, respectively (Fig. 4A). Sequences of TA(t/c)nnT for the –10 region and TtnaCA for the –35 region were found within promoter regions of the other glucose metabolism genes (Fig. 4B), and these promoter regions were similar to the promoter sequences suggested to be recognized by SigA of C. glutamicum, TA(c/t)aaT for the –10 region and ttGcca for the –35 region (29). The consensus sequence of the –10 promoter region recognized by SigB is comparable to that recognized by SigA, but the fourth and fifth adenines of the –10 promoter sequences of the SigB-regulated genes are highly conserved. The –10 promoter sequence of the ldhA gene (cgR2812), CATAAT, is similar to that of the SigB-regulated genes (Fig. 4B), and it has been downregulated by sigB disruption during exponential growth (see Table S4 in the supplemental material). SigB would preferentially recognize the –10 promoter sequence with the fourth and fifth adenines. Although the –35 promoter sequence is less conserved, it is likely that the selectivities of the –35 promoter sequence for SigA and SigB differ. However, sigB disruption did not completely eliminate transcription of glucose metabolism genes regulated by SigB but reduced the transcript levels by half (Fig. 2), suggesting that SigA is also capable of directing transcription from these promoters and cooperates with SigB in transcription of glucose metabolism genes.
We identified 114 genes whose transcript levels were decreased by sigB disruption under conditions of oxygen deprivation and during exponential growth (see Tables S2 and S4 in the supplemental material). Twenty-seven genes were downregulated under both conditions. Moreover, only four genes, cgR1219, cgR1581, cgR1849, and cgR2611, were previously shown by Larisch et al. to be SigB regulated (22); in their study, effects of sigB disruption on changes in gene expression between exponential and transition phases were examined. These results suggest that SigB is involved in the regulation of different sets of genes depending on growth conditions in cooperation with specific transcriptional regulators.
It has been thought that the group 2 sigma factor is involved in regulation of gene expression at the transition to stationary phase and in the stress response network (9, 10, 22). RpoS specifically induces the expression of numerous genes at the transition phase and at the same time takes over cellular functions from RpoD by continuing the transcription of genes with promoters recognized by both sigma factors. Recently, RpoS of E. coli was shown to regulate a large set of genes even during exponential growth (3, 31). It has been reported that the group 2 sigma factor SigE of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 participates in regulation of gene expression during exponential growth and positively regulates sugar catabolic pathways (28). In the present study, we showed that SigB of C. glutamicum positively regulates glucose metabolism genes even during exponential growth, supporting the notion that the group 2 sigma factor should function as another vegetative sigma factor.
This study was partially supported by a grant from the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization, Japan.
Published ahead of print on 20 June 2008. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
S (RpoS) subunit of RNA polymerase. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66:373-395.
factor sigE. J. Biol. Chem. 280:30653-30659.
vera, A. Guyonvarch, O. Reyes, and G. Leblon. 2003. Promoters of Corynebacterium glutamicum. J. Biotechnol. 104:311-323.[CrossRef][Medline]
S-dependent genes, promoters, and sigma factor selectivity. J. Bacteriol. 187:1591-1603.This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»