Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 2008, p. 5838-5840, Vol. 74, No. 18
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.00352-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan,1 Center for Advancing Microbial Risk Assessment, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan,2 Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan3
Received 11 February 2008/ Accepted 5 July 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Quantitative microbial risk assessment frameworks are now being used to evaluate the health risks caused by pathogens via fomites. Microbial attenuation on fomites over time is critical in the analysis. However, data on survival times and decay rates on fomite are limited, and it has been difficult to incorporate microbial decay into quantitative microbial risk assessment frameworks and disease transmission models.
Here we investigated microbial decay rates of bacteriophage P22 and Staphylococcus aureus on nonporous fomite materials using both plate assay and quantitative PCR methods. Bacteriophage P22, provided by Charles P. Gerba (University of Arizona), and S. aureus (ATCC number 25923) were used as surrogates for viruses and non-spore-forming bacteria, respectively.
Six types of nonporous fomite materials (surface areas, 10 cm2), including aluminum, ceramic, glass, plastic, stainless steel, and laminated wood, were inoculated with P22 and S. aureus in 10-µl droplets (approximately 107 PFU/cm2 of P22 and 106 CFU/cm2 of S. aureus). The fomite materials were kept at a room temperature of 25°C and ambient relative humidity of 50% until analysis. The inoculated droplets became visibly dried in 30 min. After 0, 22, 41, 66, 115, 162, 332, 552, and 859 h from inoculation, three plates for each material were collected and P22 and S. aureus were recovered from the plate using a wipe method with premoistened antistatic wipes and 150 mM phosphate-buffered saline with 0.01% Tween 80 as an extraction reagent (T. Shibata, Y. Masago, D. L. Cologgi, and J. B. Rose, submitted for publication). The P22 plaque assay was conducted using EPA method 1602 (9) with some minor modifications. For S. aureus, an aliquot of 100 µl of the eluate or dilutions with phosphate-buffered saline was spread onto BBL mannitol salt agar plates (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD) using a flame-sterilized bent glass rod and incubated at 35 ± 2°C for 48 h.
The genome DNA was extracted from 200 µl of the eluates using the QIAamp DNA minikit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and detected using the LightCycler 1.5 system (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN). Primers and a TaqMan probe for P22 detection were designed using the Primer Express 2.0 software program (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with the whole-genome sequence of the bacteriophage P22 strain used in this study (accession number AB362338) (Table 1). Specificity of the primers and the probe was tested by homology search using BLASTN (3) to confirm nontarget DNA could not be amplified. PCR mixtures (20 µl in total) contained 2 µl of DNA sample, 4 µl of 5x PCR master mix (LightCycler TaqMan Master; Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN), 500 nM each of forward and reverse primers, and 150 nM of the TaqMan probe. Amplification was initiated using the hot start method at 95°C for 10 min; 45 cycles of 95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 20 s, and 72°C for 10 s; and cooling at 40°C for 30 s. Sensitivity analysis (Fig. 1) showed the detection limit of the assay was 3.8 PFU/tube, corresponding to 9.5 x 102 PFU/ml eluate. The genome DNA of S. aureus was detected by following the protocol of Goto et al. (5) (Table 1). The detection limit for S. aureus DNA was 7.3 CFU/PCR tube or 1.8 x 103 CFU/ml eluate. Spiking 2 µl of extracts of fomite eluates (aluminum) in the PCR standard did not change the threshold cycle values of the real-time PCR standard (Fig. 1), showing no inhibitory effect from environmental washings on the quantification of the P22 genome DNA.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Primer and TaqMan probe sequences for detection of P22 and S. aureus
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Standard curves for P22 qPCR detection with or without environmental contaminants (n = 3 for each concentration). The dashed line is the standard curve for P22 quantification, and the solid line is the standard curve with 2 µl of fomite eluates (aluminum) in the PCR reagent.
|
P22 survived for 859 h (36 days), while culturable S. aureus was detected at 552 h but not detected at 859 h from any types of fomites (Fig. 2). The inactivation rates of both microbes, evaluated using plate assays, were much higher than the DNA degradation rates in real-time PCR (Table 2) (P < 0.001 by t test for all microbes and fomite types). DNA degradation of S. aureus was almost undetectable, suggesting that the genomes can exist for a very long period of time after the cell has lost its viability. This result clearly showed that detection of pathogen genome on fomites indicates possible contamination of the fomites in the past, but it does not necessarily imply a health risk to humans. Use of traditional cultivation methods is still suitable for quantitative investigations of microbial fomite contamination associated with the need to evaluate the probability of infection.
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Survival of P22 and S. aureus on various types of fomite surfaces over time (each plot is the geometric mean for triplicated fomite samples). The y axis shows normalized concentrations in log10(Nt/N0), where Nt is the concentration at sampling (time t) and N0 is the concentration at time zero. Dotted circles surrounding plots indicate that white plots (S. aureus) are hidden behind the black plots (P22).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Decay rates (k) of P22 and S. aureus on various types of nonporous fomites
|
We thank Rebecca Ives, Ai Masago, Sangeetha Srinivasan, Theng Theng Fong, and Lauren Bellows at Michigan State University for their technical support.
Published ahead of print on 11 July 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»