Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2008, p. 6457-6460, Vol. 74, No. 20
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.00895-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Isolation and Identification of Bifidobacteriaceae from Human Saliva
David Beighton,1,2*
Steven C. Gilbert,2
Douglas Clark,1
Maria Mantzourani,1
Mustafa al-Haboubi,1
Farida Ali,1
Elizabeth Ransome,1
Nicholas Hodson,1
Michael Fenlon,1
Liana Zoitopoulos,1 and
Jennifer Gallagher1
Infection Research Group, Dental Institute, King's College London, London, United Kingdom SE1 9RT,1
Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom SE1 9RT2
Received 20 April 2008/
Accepted 11 August 2008

ABSTRACT
Bifidobacteriaceae were isolated from saliva and infected dentine
by using a mupirocin-based selective medium. Of the saliva samples,
94% harbored bifids. The mean concentration (± the standard
error) was 4.46 (±0.12) log
10(CFU per ml + 1), and the
predominant isolates were
Bifidobacterium dentium, B. longum, Scardovia inopinata, Parascardovia denticolens, and
Alloscardovia omnicolens.

INTRODUCTION
The
Bifidobacteriaceae constitute a significant proportion of
the microbiota in the human gut (
12), but the bifid populations
of the oral cavity have been much less well studied. Little
is known of their intraoral distribution or of the environmental
factors, including dietary components, which may influence their
numbers or the proportions of individual species isolated from
the mouth. The cultivable commensal oral bifids are
Bifidobacterium dentium, Scardovia inopinata, and
Parascardovia denticolens (
9,
20,
31), and
Scardovia genomospecies strain C1 and
Scardovia sp. strain T01-04 have also been described previously (
16,
25).
Oral bifids have been at best sporadically isolated, but when
isolated or identified in 16S rRNA cloning and sequencing studies,
they are usually found in carious dental tissues (
1,
4,
7,
8,
11,
15,
17,
22-
25,
33) but are not detected in healthy mouth
tissues or in root caries lesion specimens (
2,
26). There is
inconsistency in the results of these previous studies. The
aim of this study was to use conventional cultural methods to
determine the prevalences and identities of oral bifids and,
consequently, to investigate the genotypic diversity of
B. dentium and
B. longum.
We collected 5-min paraffin wax-stimulated saliva samples from 192 healthy dentate adult volunteers and infected dentine samples from the root caries lesions of 9 different subjects. The saliva samples were diluted in fastidious anaerobe broth (Lab M Ltd.). For the isolation of bifids, aliquots were spread onto a modified version of modified Trypticase-phytone-yeast extract (MTPY) medium (27), MMTPY, consisting of, per liter of deionized water, proteose peptone (Oxoid), 7 g; soya peptone (Oxoid), 5 g; yeast extract (Oxoid), 5 g; glucose, 15 g; raffinose, 5 g; cysteine-HCl, 0.5 g; K2HPO4, 2 g; MgCl2·6H2O, 0.5 g; ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.25 g; CaCl2, 0.15 g; FeCl3, 0.001 g; agar, 15 g; and Tween 80, 1 ml. The medium was autoclaved at 15 lb/in2 for 15 min and cooled, and 1 ml of glacial acetic acid and 1 ml of a 5-mg/ml mupirocin-50% ethanol solution were added. The dentine samples were diluted in Chalgren-Wilkins medium (Oxoid), and bifids were isolated using MMTPY. Compared to MTPY medium, the MMTPY had a reduced concentration of mupirocin, from 100 to 5 µg/ml, and modifications to the peptone source and raffinose to promote the isolation of non-glucose-fermenting species (5, 32). These modifications did not significantly affect the utility of the medium, as the growth of nonbifid organisms was inhibited and the counts of viable cells of type and reference strains were not significantly different from those on MTPY medium (data not shown). The numbers of mutans streptococci, lactobacilli, and yeasts (primarily Candida spp.) in the saliva samples were determined (39); the detection limit was 10 CFU per ml. The total number of presumptive bifid colonies on the MMTPY was established, a sample of each presumptive bifid colony type from 129 subjects was subcultured, and partial 16S rRNA gene sequences were obtained using the primers Bif164mod (5'-GGGTGGTAATRCCSRATG-3') and Bif662mod (5'-CCACCGTTACACCGRGAA-3'), modified from those described previously (34), or the universal primers (21) 63F and 1387F. Sequences were determined with the ABI Prism BigDye Terminator version 3.0 cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) and analyzed by using information from the Ribosomal Database Project (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/) or from BLAST searching. Bifids were isolated from 94% of participants, and the concentrations of bifids in saliva samples were not significantly different from those of mutans streptococci but were significantly greater than those of the other taxa (Table 1); the relative proportions of bifids and lactobacilli mirrored those in human adult feces (10). The improved detection of bifids was a consequence of the use of a selective medium and the observation that the 27F primer used in most 16S rRNA sequencing studies has three mismatches with the 27F sequence of all Bifidobacteriaceae (14), resulting in significantly reduced detection of this taxon. Approximately 50% of subjects had salivary bifid and mutans streptococcus counts of >105 (Fig. 1). The concentrations of all taxa in saliva samples correlated negatively with the salivary flow rate, and those of all taxa correlated significantly with one another (Table 1), suggesting that similar intraoral factors, including the salivary flow rate, may influence the concentrations of these organisms in saliva.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1. Concentrations of bifids and caries-associated microorganisms in adult saliva samples and frequencies of isolation of these organismsa
|
Of 354 presumptive bifid colonies identified, 341 (96.3%) were
Bifidobacteriaceae. B. dentium was isolated from 106 subjects
(82.2%).
S. inopinata and
P. denticolens were isolated from
six (4.7%) and four (3.2%) subjects, respectively, while
B. scardovii and
Alloscardovia omnicolens were each isolated from
two subjects (1.6%). The identities of the predominant bifids
were in accord with those in previous studies (
9,
23,
30), but
this is the first report of the isolation of
A. omnicolens (
19)
and
B. scardovii (
18) from nonclinical specimens, suggesting
that the mouth may be their normal habitat.
B. longum was isolated
from 14 subjects (10.8%), and from 8 subjects, only
B. longum was isolated, with concentrations of up to >10
7 CFU per ml
of saliva and a median of 4.4
x 10
5 CFU per ml. The salivary
bifid concentrations in the samples from which
B. longum was
isolated were significantly greater than those in the other
samples (mean ± standard error, 5.72 ± 0.22 versus
4.60 ± 0.12 log
10[CFU per ml + 1];
P < 0.001).
B. longum isolates fermented (
6) arabinose, glucose, and xylose,
suggesting that they belonged to biovar longum (
29).
To investigate the genotypic diversity of B. dentium, we examined 51 randomly selected independent isolates by repetitive extragenic palindromic PCR (REP-PCR) (3), and each isolate was distinct (similarity, <90%) (Fig. 2A), similar to those of other oral commensal bacteria in previous studies (3, 13, 37). Individual root caries lesion samples harbored unique genotypes, and multiple genotypes were detected in each root caries lesion specimen (Fig. 2B). The isolation of B. longum from 10% of subjects indicates that there is a potential for B. longum derived from probiotic foods to establish in the mouth, although bifids consumed as probiotics do not persist in the normal fecal flora (28, 32). To ascertain whether the B. longum strains were the same and therefore likely to be from the same source, 12 independent isolates were genotyped using REP-PCR (3) and the BOX1AR primer, 5'-CTACGGCAAGGCGACGCTGACG-3' (23). Neither genotyping method differentiated all isolates, but the combination of patterns demonstrated that all isolates were distinct (Fig. 3), suggesting independent origins for these strains. Thus, isolates Mu55-1 and Mu91-2 were similar by REP-PCR but were different by analysis with the BOX1AR primer. Repetitive-sequence PCRs have been used previously to identify individual species but not to assess intraspecies diversity (23, 38). In previous studies, three B. dentium isolates had apparently identical sequences as determined with the BOXA1R primer (23), while enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-like primers gave similar band patterns for closely related species (35); here, REP-PCR primers (36) resulted in unique patterns for independent isolates, suggesting that REP-PCR may be useful for tracking isolates in epidemiological studies.
In conclusion,
Bifidobacteriaceae were present at high levels
in the saliva of adults and their numbers were significantly
correlated with those of caries-associated organisms. Studies
are now required to investigate the oral ecology of this taxon
and to determine the utility of these organisms as markers of
caries risk.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This project was funded in part by King's College London, The
Biomedical Research Centre of Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital
Foundation Trust, and the Dunhill Medical Research Foundation.
GlaxoSmithKline generously supplied the mupirocin.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Infection Research Group, Dental Institute, King's College London, London, United Kingdom SE1 9RT. Phone: 44-207-188-7465. Fax: 44-207-188-7466. E-mail:
david.beighton{at}kcl.ac.uk 
Published ahead of print on 22 August 2008. 

REFERENCES
1 - Aas, J. A., A. L. Griffen, S. R. Dardis, A. M. Lee, I. Olsen, F. E. Dewhirst, E. J. Leys, and B. J. Paster. 2008. Bacteria of dental caries in primary and permanent teeth in children and young adults. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:1407-1417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Aas, J. A., B. J. Paster, L. N. Stokes, I. Olsen, and F. E. Dewhirst. 2005. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:5721-5732.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Alam, S., S. R. Brailsford, S. Adams, C. Allison, E. Sheehy, L. Zoitopoulos, E. A. Kidd, and D. Beighton. 2006. Genotypic heterogeneity of Streptococcus oralis and distinct aciduric subpopulations in human dental plaque. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:3330-3336.
4 - Becker, M. R., B. J. Paster, E. J. Leys, M. L. Moeschberger, S. G. Kenyon, J. L. Galvin, S. K. Boches, F. E. Dewhirst, and A. L. Griffen. 2002. Molecular analysis of bacterial species associated with childhood caries. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1001-1009.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Biavati, B. 2001. Bifidobacteria, p. 10-33. In B. Biavati, V. Bottazzi, L. Morelli, and C. Schiavi (ed.), Microorganisms as health supporters, vol. 3. Probiotics and bifidobacteria. Mofin-Alce, Novara, Italy.
6 - Brailsford, S. R., R. B. Tregaskis, H. S. Leftwich, and D. Beighton. 1999. The predominant Actinomyces spp. isolated from infected dentin of active root caries lesions. J. Dent. Res. 78:1525-1534.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Chavez de Paz, L. E., A. Molander, and G. Dahlen. 2004. Gram-positive rods prevailing in teeth with apical periodontitis undergoing root canal treatment. Int. Endod. J. 37:579-587.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 - Chhour, K. L., M. A. Nadkarni, R. Byun, F. E. Martin, N. A. Jacques, and N. Hunter. 2005. Molecular analysis of microbial diversity in advanced caries. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:843-849.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Crociani, F., B. Biavati, A. Alessandrini, C. Chiarini, and V. Scardovi. 1996. Bifidobacterium inopinatum sp. nov. and Bifidobacterium denticolens sp. nov., two new species isolated from human dental caries. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 46:564-571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Delgado, S., P. Ruas-Madiedo, A. Suárez, and B. Mayo. 2006. Interindividual differences in microbial counts and biochemical-associated variables in the feces of healthy Spanish adults. Dig. Dis. Sci. 51:737-743.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Edwardsson, S. 1974. Bacteriological studies on deep areas of carious dentine. Odontol. Revy Suppl. 32:1-143.[Medline]
12 - Felis, G. E., and F. Dellaglio. 2007. Taxonomy of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria. Curr. Issues Intest. Microbiol. 8:44-61.[Medline]
13 - Fitzsimmons, S., M. Evans, C. Pearce, M. J. Sheridan, R. Wientzen, G. Bowden, and M. F. Cole. 1996. Clonal diversity of Streptococcus mitis biovar 1 isolates from the oral cavity of human neonates. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 3:517-522.[Medline]
14 - Frank, J. A., C. I. Reich, S. Sharma, J. S. Weisbaum, B. A. Wilson, and G. J. Olsen. 2008. Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:2461-2470.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Hojo, K., C. Mizoguchi, N. Taketomo, T. Ohshima, K. Gomi, T. Arai, and N. Maeda. 2007. Distribution of salivary Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species in periodontal health and disease. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 71:152-157.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 - Hooper, S. J., S. J. Crean, M. A. O. Lewis, D. A. Spratt, W. G. Wade, and M. J. Wilson. 2006. Viable bacteria present within oral squamous cell carcinoma tissue. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:1719-1725.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Hoshino, E. 1985. Predominant obligate anaerobes in human carious dentin. J. Dent. Res. 64:1195-1198.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18 - Hoyles, L., E. Inganäs, E. Falsen, M. Drancourt, N. Weiss, A. L. McCartney, and M. D. Collins. 2002. Bifidobacterium scardovii sp. nov., from human sources. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52:995-999.[Abstract]
19 - Huys, G., M. Vancanneyt, K. D'Haene, E. Falsen, G. Wauters, and P. Vandamme. 2007. Alloscardovia omnicolens gen. nov., sp. nov., from human clinical samples. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57:1442-1446.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20 - Jian, W., and X. Dong. 2002.Transfer of Bifidobacterium inopinatum and Bifidobacterium denticolens to Scardovia inopinata gen. nov., comb. nov., and Parascardovia denticolens gen. nov., comb. nov., respectively. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52:809-812.[Abstract]
21 - Lane, D. J. 1991. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing, p. 115-175. In E. Stackebrandt and M. Goodfellow (ed.), Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom.
22 - Maeda, N. 1980. Anaerobic, gram-positive, pleomorphic rods in human gingival crevice. Bull. Tokyo Med. Dent. Univ. 27:63-70.[Medline]
23 - Masco, L., G. Huys, D. Gevers, L. Verbrugghen, and J. Swings. 2003. Identification of Bifidobacterium species using rep-PCR fingerprinting. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 26:557-563.[CrossRef][Medline]
24 - Modesto, M., B. Biavati, and P. Mattarelli. 2006. Occurrence of the family Bifidobacteriaceae in human dental caries and plaque. Caries Res. 40:271-276.[CrossRef][Medline]
25 - Munson, M. A., A. Banerjee, T. F. Watson, and W. G. Wade. 2004. Molecular analysis of the microflora associated with dental caries. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:3023-3029.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26 - Preza, D., I. Olsen, J. A. Aas, T. Willumsen, B. Grinde, and B. J. Paster. 2008. Bacterial profiles of root caries in elderly patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:2015-2021.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27 - Rada, V., and J. Petr. 2000. A new selective medium for the isolation of glucose non-fermenting bifidobacteria from hen caeca. J. Microbiol. Methods 43:127-132.[CrossRef][Medline]
28 - Rochet, V., L. Rigottier-Gois, A. Ledaire, C. Andrieux, M. Sutren, S. Rabot, A. Mogenet, J. L. Bresson, S. Cools, C. Picard, N. Goupil-Feuillerat, and J. Doré. 2008. Survival of Bifidobacterium animalis DN-173 010 in the faecal microbiota after administration in lyophilised form or in fermented product: a randomised study in healthy adults. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 14:128-136.[CrossRef][Medline]
29 - Sakata, S., M. Kitahara, M. Sakamoto, H. Hayashi, M. Fukuyama, and Y. Benno. 2002. Unification of Bifidobacterium infantis and Bifidobacterium suis as Bifidobacterium longum. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52:1945-1951.[Abstract]
30 - Sanyal, B., and C. Russell. 1978. Nonsporing, anaerobic, gram-positive rods in saliva and the gingival crevice of humans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 35:670-678.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31 - Scardovi, V., and F. Crociani. 1974. Bifidobacterium catenulatum, Bifidobacterium dentium and Bifidobacterium angulatum: three new species and their deoxyribonucleic acid homology relationships. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 24:6-20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32 - Su, P., A. Henriksson, J. E. Tandianus, J. H. Park, F. Foong, and N. W. Dunn. 2005. Detection and quantification of Bifidobacterium lactis LAFTI B94 in human faecal samples from a consumption trial. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 244:99-103.[CrossRef][Medline]
33 - van Houte, J., J. Lopman, and R. Kent. 1996. The final pH of bacteria comprising the predominant flora on sound and carious human root and enamel surfaces. J. Dent. Res. 75:1008-1014.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34 - Venema, K., and A. J. Maathuis. 2003. A PCR-based method for identification of bifidobacteria from the human alimentary tract at the species level. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 224:143-149.[CrossRef][Medline]
35 - Ventura, M., V. Meylan, and R. Zink. 2003. Identification and tracing of Bifidobacterium species by use of enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequences. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:4296-4301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36 - Versalovic, J., T. Koeuth, and J. R. Lupski. 1991. Distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in eubacteria and application to fingerprinting of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:6823-6831.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37 - Yoshino, T., M. L. Laine, A. J. van Winkelhoff, and G. Dahlén. 2007. Genotypic characterization of Porphyromonas gingivalis isolated from Swedish patients with periodontitis and from periodontal abscesses. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 22:195-200.[CrossRef][Medline]
38 - Youn, S. Y., J. M. Seo, and G. E. Ji. 2008. Evaluation of the PCR method for identification of Bifidobacterium species. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 46:7-13.[Medline]
39 - Zoitopoulos, L., S. R. Brailsford, S. Gelbier, R. W. Ludford, S. H. Marchant, and D. Beighton. 1996. Dental caries and caries-associated micro-organisms in the saliva and plaque of 3- and 4-year-old Afro-Caribbean and Caucasian children in south London. Arch. Oral Biol. 41:1011-1018.[CrossRef][Medline]
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2008, p. 6457-6460, Vol. 74, No. 20
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.00895-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.