Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 2008, p. 6923-6930, Vol. 74, No. 22
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.01473-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Bruno Vlaeminck,1,
Veerle Fievez,1*
Lois Maignien,2
Jan Dijkstra,3 and
Nico Boon2
Laboratory for Animal Nutrition and Animal Product Quality (Lanupro), Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Proefhoevestraat 10, 9090 Melle, Belgium,1 Laboratory of Microbial Ecology and Technology (LabMET), Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Gent, Belgium,2 Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University, Marijkeweg 40, 6709 PG Wageningen, The Netherlands3
Received 1 July 2008/ Accepted 16 September 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Marine products, such as fish oil and algae, proved to possess high effectiveness in the inhibition of rumen biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids (5, 30). The long-chain PUFA eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and/or docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) was found to be the active compounds in this process (1, 7). Their supplementation reduced C18:0 production, resulting in the accumulation of various hydrogenation intermediates, predominantly C18:1 trans 11 (t11) and C18:1 t10. Incomplete biohydrogenation, induced by dietary algae, was found to be associated with the disappearance of some ciliates (5). Based on this study, we hypothesized that ciliates and/or their associated bacteria could play a role in rumen biohydrogenation (5). However, further research on rumen biohydrogenation of C18:2 n-6 by pure Isotricha prostoma and its associated bacteria showed only minor biohydrogenation by the protozoal species, its bacterial symbionts, or a mixture of both (6).
Since the majority of bacteria are as yet unculturable and in vitro findings do not always reflect in vivo mechanisms, the current in vivo research with DHA-enriched microalgae is aimed at studying mutual changes in the rumen C18 biohydrogenation and the composition of the rumen microbial community through cultivation-independent techniques. More specifically, a PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) method was optimized for the Butyrivibrio group to examine the time-dependent shifts in rumen Butyrivibrio species and rumen C18:1 trans accumulation following supplementation of the diet with algae.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Ingredient, chemical, and fatty acid composition of the diet before (day –2) and during algal-concentrate feeding
|
Rumen fatty acid analysis.
Fatty acids in freeze-dried ruminal digesta (2.5 g) were extracted with chloroform/methanol (2/1 [vol/vol]) as described by Chow et al. (11). Tridecanoic acid (10 mg; Sigma, Bornem, Belgium) was added as an internal standard. The extracted fatty acids were methylated as described by Raes et al. (27) with NaOH/MeOH (0.5 mol/liter; 3 ml), followed by HCl/MeOH (1/1 [vol/vol]; 2 ml). The FAME were extracted with 3 and 2 ml hexane, pooled, and evaporated to dryness under N2. The residue was dissolved in 1 ml hexane and analyzed by gas chromatography (HP 6890; Agilent Technologies, Brussels, Belgium) on a CP-Sil88 column for FAME (100 m by 250 µm by 0.2 µm; Chrompack, Middelburg, The Netherlands) (27). FAME were identified using external standards (S37 [Supelco, Poole, Dorset, United Kingdom]; conjugated linoleic acid [CLA] cis 9 [c9] t11, CLA t10c12, and odd- and branched-chain fatty acids [Larodan Fine Chemicals AB, Malmö, Sweden]) and quantified using the internal standard. Some C18 fatty acids were identified according to the elution sequence reported by Ratnayake (28) and Shingfield et al. (31).
Bacterial strains, growth conditions, and DNA extraction.
B. fibrisolvens DSM 3071 (10) was purchased from the German collection of microorganisms and cell cultures (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany). B. fibrisolvens MDT-5 (13) was kindly donated by T. Hino (Meiji University, Kawasaki, Japan). The bacteria were anaerobically cultured for 64 h at 39°C in a rumen medium containing glucose, cellobiose, maltose, and starch as carbon sources (medium 330; DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany). Bacterial DNA (2 ml of growth medium) and total DNA of ruminal digesta (0.5 g), sampled before the morning feeding (0 h), were extracted following the method of Boon et al. (9). DNA extracts of Escherichia coli DH5
(Invitrogen, Merelbeke, Belgium), Lactobacillus brevis LMG 7761 (38), and Bifidobacterium animalis LMG 11580 (4) were used as negative controls. The Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains were purchased from the Belgian culture collection (BCCM/LMG, Gent, Belgium).
Ciliate, bacterial, and Butyrivibrio PCRs.
A nested-PCR approach was used to amplify a fragment of the 18S rRNA genes of ciliates for DGGE according to the method of Boeckaert et al. (5). General bacterial PCR for DGGE was performed as described by Boon et al. (8) using the bacterial primers P338F-GC and P518r. It should be noted that research performed by Huws et al. (17) indicated that these primer pairs also amplify nonspecific protozoal 18S rRNA, fungal 18S rRNA, and archaeal 16S rRNA. A third PCR was aimed at amplifying a fragment of the 16S rRNA gene of the Butyrivibrio group. Butyrivibrio-specific primers were designed using PRIMROSE software (3) based on sequences from the genera Butyrivibrio and Pseudobutyrivibrio. After primer design, the primer pair candidates were tested in silico using PRIMROSE (3) and the Ribosomal Database Project (34). The sequences (5'-3') of the forward and reverse primer were GYG AAG AAG TAT TTC GGT AT (B395f) and CCA ACA CCT AGT ATT CAT C (B812r), respectively. These primers also allowed annealing for other genera within the family Lachnospiraceae. A 40-bp GC clamp (9) was attached to the forward primer for DGGE. The amplification conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing at 55°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 2 min; and final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR mixture was prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) and contained 1 µl DNA extract, 0.5 µl of each primer (10 µM stock), 0.5 µl deoxynucleotide triphosphate mixture (10 mM each), 2.5 µl 10x Taq buffer with KCl (500 mM), 1.5 µl MgCl2 (25 mM), 0.125 µl Taq DNA polymerase (0.6 U), 0.06 µl bovine serum albumin, and DNase-RNase-free filter-sterilized water (Sigma, Bornem, Belgium) to a final volume of 25 µl. The amplicons were visualized by gel electrophoresis with 1% agarose and ethidium bromide.
DGGE analysis.
Ciliate and bacterial DGGE were performed as described by Boeckaert et al. (5) and Boon et al. (8), respectively. For the Butyrivibrio-specific DGGE, Butyrivibrio-specific PCR fragments were loaded onto a 7% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gel (40% acrylamide, 77.8%; 2% bis-acrylamide, 22.2%) in 1x TAE buffer (40 mM Tris, 20 mM acetate, 2 mM EDTA, pH 8.5) with denaturing gradients ranging from 45% to 60%. The electrophoresis was run for 16 h at 60°C and 45 V. DGGE patterns were visualized by staining with Sybr green I nucleic acid gel stain (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). The DGGE patterns obtained were analyzed with BioNumerics software version 3.5 (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium). Similarities were calculated by the Pearson correlation, taking into account band intensity and band position. The clustering algorithm of Ward (35) was used to calculate dendrograms.
Cloning and identification of Butyrivibrio species.
The Butyrivibrio sp. PCR product of cow 1 on day 6 of algal feeding was cloned using a Topo-TA cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions in order to create a clone library. For each clone, an aliquot of 800 µl was stored in 40% (vol/vol) glycerol, while plasmid DNA was isolated from the remaining liquid using the High Pure plasmid isolation kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Subsequent DGGE analysis excluded identical clones. The resulting 23 exclusive clones were identified by sequencing the partial 16S rRNA gene fragments (ITT Biotech, Bielefeld, Germany). Additionally, Butyrivibrio DGGE bands, which specifically modified upon algal feeding, were excised. After Butyrivibrio-specific PCR and purification of the PCR product (Qiaquick PCR Purification Kit; Qiagen Benelux B.V., Venlo, The Netherlands), these bands were cloned with a Topo-TA cloning kit as described above. Close relatives of the 16S rRNA sequences were identified with the sequence match server of Ribosomal Database Project II (34). Additionally, sequences were aligned with the NAST software (12). The alignment was manually checked using the ARB aligner tool (ARB Software) (37), after which the sequences were added to the original phylogenetic tree (Greengenes database, January 2008 [12]) using Parsimony (ARB Software) (37) without changing the tree topology.
qPCR.
Ciliate and total bacterial rRNA gene copies present in the DNA extract of each ruminal-digesta sample were quantified as described by Boeckaert et al. (5) and Boon et al. (9), respectively. Butyrivibrio rRNA gene copies present in the DNA extract of each sample were quantified using an ABI Prism SDS 7000 instrument (Applied Biosystems, Lennik, Belgium) following the principle of Heid et al. (16). Dilutions (1:20) of DNA from all samples were added to amplification reaction mixtures (25 µl) containing 12.5 µl Sybr green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, United Kingdom), 6 µl RNA-free water, 0.75 µl B395f primer (10 µM stock), 0.75 µl B812r primer (10 µM stock), and 5 µl DNA. The cycling conditions were 1 cycle of 50°C for 2 min and 95°C for 10 min and 40 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 54°C for 30 s, and 60°C for 1 min. Measurements were done in triplicate for each run. A standard curve for qPCR was constructed using six different DNA concentrations (n = 3) ranging from 2.67 copies to 2.67 x 108 copies of DNA per µl. A Butyrivibrio 417-bp PCR fragment inserted in a Topo vector (see above) was used as a template for the standard curve. The slope of the standard curve was –3.42 (R2 = 0.99).
Statistical analysis.
Rumen fatty acid and qPCR data were analyzed using the Mixed procedure of the SAS Institute (29). The model for rumen fatty acid data included the fixed effects of day and time of sampling and their interaction and the random effect of cow, assuming an autoregressive order one covariance structure fitted on the basis of Akaike information and Schwarz Bayesian model fit criteria. The time of sampling was treated as a repeated measure. The statistical model for qPCR data included the fixed effect of day and the random effect of cow, assuming the covariance structure as described above. Least squares means were reported, and significance was declared at a P value of <0.05.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The nucleotide sequences for clones NC1 through NC23 and B1-1 through B4-3 have been deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers EU839861 to EU839892.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Effect of time of algal feeding on the ruminal fatty acid compositiona
|
The number of ciliates present in the bovine rumen content before and during algal feeding was estimated by amplifying the 18S rRNA gene fragment of the ciliates and measuring the increasing amounts of amplification products. Before algal feeding, ciliates numbered 5.68 ± 0.52 log copies per g ruminal digesta (mean ± standard deviation). The numbers of ciliates were unaffected (P = 0.359) by algal feeding (5.14 ± 0.10, 5.17 ± 0.66, and 5.48 ± 0.07 log copies per g ruminal digesta on day 6, day 13, and day 20, respectively).
Bacterial community analysis.
Rumen bacterial DGGE profiles showed high complexity, with more than 30 bands both before and during algal feeding. Cluster analysis (Pearson correlation) resulted in two major clusters corresponding to the dietary treatments (Fig. 1). Nevertheless, these shifts in the bacterial community were difficult to link with the biohydrogenation activity, since no (dis)appearance of specific bands could be identified.
![]() View larger version (68K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Cluster analysis of the DGGE profile of total bacteria present in the rumen of cows fed algae. d, day.
|
Butyrivibrio community analysis.
The primers designed to detect Butyrivibrio spp. and relatives were tested for their specificity with B. fibrisolvens DSM 3071 and B. fibrisolvens MDT-5 as positive controls, whereas E. coli DH5
, L. brevis LMG 7761, and B. animalis LMG 11580 were used as negative controls. The primer set produced PCR products for both B. fibrisolvens strains of the expected size of 417 bp, whereas no amplification was observed for the negative control strains.
Butyrivibrio-specific DGGE generated around 15 bands, which clearly changed with time on dietary algae. Cluster analysis separated the DGGE profiles of rumen contents taken on day 13 and day 20 from cows 1 and 2 from the other DGGE profiles (Fig. 2). For these two cows, a further distinction was possible between DGGE profiles of rumen contents prior to and after the 6 days of algal feeding. For the third cow, algal feeding did not result in major shifts in the Butyrivibrio population, as DGGE profiles clustered together. Some bands disappeared from day 6 onward, whereas other bands became more pronounced on day 13 and day 20 (Fig. 2).
![]() View larger version (43K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Cluster analysis of the DGGE profile of Butyrivibrio spp. present in the rumen of cows fed algae. The numbers in the profile indicate disappearing (1 and 2) and more pronounced (3 and 4) bands following algal-concentrate feeding. d, day.
|
Cloning and sequence analysis of the Butyrivibrio community.
A clone library was constructed with the PCR product of cow 1 on day 6 in order to identify the bacterial species detected with the Butyrivibrio-specific primers. Phylogenetic clustering (Fig. 3) based on 16S rRNA sequence (417 bp) analysis indicated that the 23 clones were related to bacterial species within the genus Butyrivibrio, the genus Lachnospiraceae incertae sedis, and other, so far unknown genera within the family Lachnospiraceae and were closely related to the genera Butyrivibrio and Pseudobutyrivibrio.
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Phylogenetic tree representing the classification of 23 clones (denoted as clone NCi; 417 bp), obtained from rumen fluid of a cow fed a diet supplemented with algae (cow 1 on day 6), within the genus Butyrivibrio, the genus Lachnospiraceae incertae sedis, and other (unknown) genera within the family Lachnospiraceae. Clones Bi to Bj are derived from changing DGGE bands upon algal-concentrate feeding (i, band excised and cloned from Butyrivibrio DGGE [Fig. 1]; j, clone number).
|
|
|
|---|
Ciliate DGGE and qPCR (on average 5.37 log copies/g ruminal digesta) analysis showed no major changes in the ciliate community structure after supplementation of the diet with algae. This is in contrast with a previous experiment in which some ciliates, especially I. prostoma, disappeared after algal feeding (5). However, the daily amount of DHA supplied in the latter experiment (76.1 g DHA/day) was almost twice as high as in the current experiment (43.7 g DHA/day), probably explaining these results. In addition, further research on the specific role of I. prostoma in rumen biohydrogenation indicated that this ciliate and its associated bacteria are not directly involved (6).
The change in the total bacterial community structure with dietary supplementation of marine products was observed before (5, 20). Cluster analysis of the DGGE profile showed two clusters based on the absence or presence of algae in the diet. However, due to the complexity of the DGGE pattern of the total bacterial community, we examined in more detail bacterial groups of importance in rumen biohydrogenation. As C18 biohydrogenation is thought to be mainly performed by strains of the Butyrivibrio group, including the genera Butyrivibrio and Pseudobutyrivibrio (24), a primer set to study bacteria within this Butyrivibrio group was developed. In spite of major shifts in rumen biohydrogenation, supplementation of the diet with algae did not affect the total amount of Butyrivibrio spp. However, Butyrivibrio-specific DGGE profiles showed a shift in this group with time on a diet supplemented with algae. Some DGGE bands disappeared upon supplementation of the diet with algae, which was associated with a decrease in rumen C18:0 concentrations (Fig. 2, bands 1 and 2). We hypothesize that bacteria associated with these disappearing bands might play a role in the conversion of C18:1 trans to C18:0. Until now, C18:0 production was linked with isolates belonging to the B. proteoclasticus group (19) and the Butyrivibrio sp. branch (21), which all possess a close phylogenetic relationship. However, none of the species present in the disappearing bands belonged to this B. proteoclasticus group. On the other hand, 20% of the clones from the clone library of cow 1 on day 6 were classified in the B. proteoclasticus branch despite the reduced ruminal C18:0 concentration (17.0 versus 1.65 mg/g ruminal digesta DM before and on day 6 of dietary algal supplementation, respectively). The presence of these bacteria in the B. proteoclasticus branch was unexpected, as the bacteria are highly sensitive to PUFA (19) and C18:0 production was significantly decreased. This might indicate that the presence of DHA decreases the capacity of these bacteria to hydrogenate C18:1 trans fatty acids rather than the bacteria as such. Competitive inhibition of bacterial isomerases and reductases and/or competition for hydrogen used in the simultaneous biohydrogenation of DHA and unsaturated C18 fatty acids (1, 36) might also explain the limited conversion of C18:1 trans fatty acids to C18:0 by bacteria belonging to the B. proteoclasticus group. Alternatively, these results could indicate that bacteria within the B. proteoclasticus branch have a limited contribution to in vivo C18:0 formation. Kim et al. (20) found that the decreased duodenal C18:0 flow in steers fed fish oil was not associated with C. proteoclasticum 16S rRNA gene concentrations in strained rumen fluid. Similarly, Huws et al. (18) reported that DNA concentrations from the Butyrivibrio C18:0-producing group did not correlate with the C18:0 concentrations of rumen planktonic and biofilm samples. This suggests that other, yet-uncultivated microbial species might be involved in C18:0 production and might fulfill a more important role in the final step of the biohydrogenation process. Wallace et al. (33) stated that isolation of more C18:0 producers might have been hampered by the fact that these bacteria must be growing in order to carry out biohydrogenation and that PUFA themselves have a strong tendency to inhibit this growth. It is generally recognized that only a minor part of the diversity of microorganisms in nature is presently known (2). Hence, it is not unlikely that reduced C18:0 production is associated with the disappearance of uncultivated species. Identification of the disappearing bands through cloning and subsequent phylogenetic classification indicated that these noncultivated species were located on a separate branch between the genera Butyrivibrio and Pseudobutyrivibrio, belonging to unknown Lachnospiraceae strains genetically more distant from the B. proteoclasticus group. The concomitant disappearance of these species and decrease in the rumen C18:0 concentration might suggest that they play a role in in vivo C18:0 production. Further research is under way to evaluate the disappearance of these unknown Lachnospiraceae strains and reduced C18:0 production under various rumen conditions.
Besides reduced C18:0 concentrations, increased C18:1 t11 and C18:1 t10 concentrations were observed after feeding with the algal concentrate. This was associated with some more pronounced bands in the Butyrivibrio DGGE profile (Fig. 2, bands 3 and 4). Identification through cloning and subsequent phylogenetic classification indicated that these bands also represented noncultivated species located on a separate branch between the genera Butyrivibrio and Pseudobutyrivibrio. This might indicate that some Butyrivibrio-like bacteria are associated with changes in the rumen resulting in C18:1 t11 and C18:1 t10 accumulation. It remains to be determined whether the more pronounced appearance of these bands and accumulation of C18:1 t10 or C18:1 t11 is a causal relationship. In addition, the origin of these increased amounts of C18:1 t10, either isomerization of C18:1 c9 (23) or C18:1 t11 (22) or biohydrogenation of CLA t10c12 (14), needs to be clarified.
Although this research mainly focused on molecular techniques to describe shifts within the rumen microbial community, other bacterial markers, such as odd- and branched-chain fatty acids (32), also showed shifts upon algal feeding. In the present study, supplementation of the diet with algae increased rumen iso C17:0, anteiso C15:0, and anteiso C17:0 concentrations. In milk, these fatty acids showed a negative correlation with C18:0 (rpearson = –0.807, –0.207, and –0.446, respectively), whereas milk iso C17:0 was positively correlated with milk C18:1 t11 (rpearson = 0.983) and, to a lesser extent, with C18:1 t10 (rpearson = 0.522) (32).
Conclusion.
Supplementation of the diet with algae inhibited rumen C18 biohydrogenation, resulting in decreased C18:0 concentrations, whereas C18:1 t11 and C18:1 t10 concentrations increased. Changes in the rumen fatty acid profile were associated with changes in the structure of the bacterial community and, more specifically, with changes in the Butyrivibrio group. Clones associated with altered DGGE bands indicated that dietary algae affected noncultivated species, which cluster between the genus Butyrivibrio and the genus Pseudobutyrivibrio. Additionally, 20% of the clone library, from a randomly selected rumen sample after the start of supplementation of the diet with algae, clustered within the C18:0-producing B. proteoclasticus branch, although C18:0 production was reduced. This suggests that other, as-yet-uncultivated bacteria are involved in C18:0 production, possibly being more important than B. proteoclasticus.
G. Mengistu is acknowledged for her technical assistance in the stables and in the laboratory. We are grateful to L. Vanhaecke for critically reviewing the manuscript.
Published ahead of print on 26 September 2008. ![]()
C.B. and B.V. contributed equally to this study. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»