Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2008, p. 7286-7296, Vol. 74, No. 23
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AEM.00768-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Antonio J. Pierik,1 and
Erhard Bremer1*
Laboratory for Microbiology, Department of Biology, Philipps University Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch Str. 8, D-35032 Marburg, Germany,1 Départment Osmoregulation chez les Bactéries, Université de Rennes 1, UMR-CNRS 6026, Rennes, France2
Received 3 April 2008/ Accepted 2 October 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In addition to their role in the adaptation of microorganisms to high-osmolality habitats, compatible solutes also have protein-stabilizing properties (3) that support the correct folding of polypeptides under denaturing conditions both in vitro (4, 9, 18, 53, 54, 69) and in vivo (5, 10, 22, 34). These properties most likely result from unfavorable interactions of compatible solutes with the protein backbone (7, 75) and the concomitant preferential exclusion of these compounds from the immediate hydration shell of proteins (3). The stabilizing properties of compatible solutes probably also contribute to their function as microbial stress protectants against heat stress (8, 16, 19, 24, 25, 31, 33, 56, 67) and chill stress (2, 13, 42, 48, 50). Since compatible solutes function as protein stabilizers under various types of stress conditions (47), they are also sometimes referred to in the literature as chemical chaperones (22, 24). Compatible solutes also interact in various ways with nucleic acids (52, 74) and can influence protein-DNA interactions (66).
One of the most widely produced compatible solutes in the domain of the Bacteria are the tetrahydropyrimidine ectoine [(S)-2-methyl-1,4,5,6-tetrahydropyrimidine-4-carboxylic acid] and its hydroxylated derivative, 5-hydroxyectoine [(S,S)-2-methyl-5-hydroxy-1,4,5,6-tetrahydropyrimidine-4-carboxylic acid] (15, 23, 26). In all ectoine-producing Bacteria analyzed so far, ectoine biosynthesis is strongly enhanced under high- osmolality growth conditions (15, 17, 23, 26, 27, 49, 50, 71, 73). Molecular analysis of ectoine biosynthesis in various gram-positive and gram-negative Bacteria has shown that the ectoine biosynthetic enzymes are encoded by an evolutionarily highly conserved gene cluster, ectABC (20, 28, 49, 50, 55, 64, 71, 73). The disruption of the ectABC genes in various microorganisms results in a defect in ectoine synthesis and a concomitant salt-sensitive growth phenotype (21, 28, 64, 72, 80). These findings highlight the importance of ectoine biosynthesis for microbial adaptation to high-salinity environments.
Ectoine biosynthesis is mediated by a three-step enzymatic reaction that converts the precursor L-aspartate-β-semialdehyde, an intermediate in amino acid metabolism, into ectoine (Fig. 1) (26, 55, 63, 71). The ectoine biosynthetic enzymes (EctABC) from Halomonas elongata have been purified and characterized biochemically (61). Some ectoine producers also synthesize a derivative of ectoine, 5-hydroxyectoine (36). Its production was first discovered in Streptomyces parvulus (37) and has since been shown to occur in a large number of Bacteria (15, 23, 26). Like ectoine, 5-hydroxyectoine serves as a compatible solute in vivo and it exhibits protein-stabilizing properties in vitro (9, 40, 41, 47, 54, 57, 58). The formation of 5-hydroxyectoine occurs through direct hydroxylation of ectoine (15) via the evolutionarily conserved enzyme ectoine hydroxylase (EctD) (15, 27, 65). This enzyme is a member of the non-heme-containing, iron(II)- and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase superfamily (EC 1.14.11) (15, 30).
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Pathway for the biosynthesis of ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine. The biosynthetic route for the production of ectoine is shown; it is taken from the proposals made by Louis and Galinski (55) and Ono et al. (61). The enzymes responsible for ectoine biosynthesis are L-2,4-diaminobutyrate transaminase (EctB), L-2,4-diaminobutyrate acetyltransferase (EctA), and ectoine synthase (EctC). The enzymatic conversion of ectoine into 5-hydroxyectoine by the EctD protein (ectoine hydroxylase) is based on results obtained by Bursy et al. (15).
|
|
|
|---|
Bacteria and growth conditions.
The Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) strain used throughout this study was kindly provided by W. Wohlleben (University of Tübingen, Germany). S. coelicolor A3(2) was maintained and propagated on LB agar plates incubated at 28°C. S. coelicolor A3(2) cultures were grown in a chemically defined minimal medium (SMM without polyethylene glycol 6000) with glucose as the carbon source (45) in a shaking water bath set at 220 rpm with the indicated NaCl concentrations and growth temperatures. To avoid mycelial growth of S. coelicolor A3(2), approximately 50 glass beads (diameter of 3 mm; Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) were added to the culture. To allow efficient production of the ectoine hydroxylase, S. coelicolor A3(2) was cultivated in 2 liters of SMM with 0.5 M NaCl at 39°C without glass beads in a 5-liter flask that was shaken with 220 rpm. The cells were harvested by centrifugation (4°C, 6,000 x g) and stored at –20°C until further use for the purification of the ectoine hydroxylase.
HPLC analysis of ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine from cell extracts.
Cultures (80 ml) of S. coelicolor A3(2) were grown in a shaking water bath set at 220 rpm in minimal medium (SMM) with the indicated NaCl concentrations and growth temperatures until the cultures reached an optical density at 578 nm (OD578) of approximately 1. The cells were harvested by centrifugation (4°C, 2,800 x g) and lyophilized, the dry weight of the cells was determined, and the cells were then extracted using a modified version of the technique of Bligh and Dyer (51). Ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine contents of the samples were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis as detailed by Kuhlmann and Bremer (49). Quantification of ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine was performed with the ChromStar 6 software (SCPA, Stuhr, Germany) using commercially available ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine samples as reference standards.
Uptake assays with [14C]ectoine.
Cells of S. coelicolor A3(2) were grown in SMM to mid-log growth phase (OD578 of about 0.5) under the indicated temperatures and salinity conditions. Samples of 2 ml were taken, and 14C-ectoine (4.22 MBq mmol–1) was added to the cells at a concentration of 19 µM; the Eppendorf tube was vigorously shaken to provide enough aeration to the cells. For the transport assays, 0.3-ml samples were taken at different time intervals, and the cells were then collected by filtration through 0.45-µm-pore-size filters (Schleicher and Schuell GmbH, Dassel, Germany). The cells were washed with 20 ml isotonic SMM, and the radioactivity retained on the filters was determined by liquid scintillation counting. For the determination of the pool size of [14C]ectoine in S. coelicolor A3(2), 20-ml cell cultures were propagated in SMM in 100-ml Erlenmeyer flasks in a shaking water bath set at 220 rpm and the appropriate growth temperature; the cultures contained approximately 15 glass beads to prevent mycelium formation of S. coelicolor A3(2) cells. [14C]ectoine (4.22 MBq mmol–1) was added to the cultures at a concentration of 19 µM, and the cultures were propagated in a shaking water bath for 1 h. Samples (0.3 ml) were taken, and the [14C]ectoine accumulated by the cells was measured as described above.
Ectoine hydroxylase activity assay.
Ectoine hydroxylase activity in cell extracts and after purification of EctD was assayed by measuring the conversion of ectoine to 5-hydroxyectoine by HPLC analysis as detailed by Kuhlmann and Bremer (49) and by Bursy et al. (15). The purified ectoine hydroxylase was assayed as detailed by Bursy et al. (15), except that catalase was omitted from the reaction mixture. One unit of ectoine hydroxylase activity is defined as the conversion of 1 µmol of ectoine to 1 µmol of 5-hydroxyectoine per minute (15).
Detection of L-proline and its hydroxylation derivatives by HPLC analysis.
To test whether L-proline can serve as a substrate for the purified ectoine hydroxylase from S. coelicolor A3(2), L-proline was used instead of ectoine in the activity assay as described above. Proline and its hydroxylated derivatives were analyzed by HPLC analyses after modification with 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate (FMOC) (51) as detailed by Bursy et al. (15). L-Proline, 3-hydroxy-DL-proline, and 4-hydroxy-L-proline were used as reference standards for the HPLC analysis.
Purification of the ectoine hydroxylase.
All operations were carried out at 4°C unless otherwise stated. Column chromatography was performed with a fast-performance liquid chromatography system (Amersham Biosciences, Freiburg, Germany). Approximately 20 g (wet weight) of frozen cells was resuspended in 40 ml of buffer A: 100 mM TES [N-tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid, pH 7.5], 2 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM benzamidine, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.4 mM EDTA, and 5% (vol/vol) glycerol. The cells were disrupted by passing them four times through a French pressure cell (16,000 lb/in2). After removal of cell debris by ultracentrifugation (1 h, 95,000 x g), the supernatant was extensively dialyzed at 4°C against 5 liters of 25 mM TES (pH 7.5) (buffer B) to completely remove the endogenously produced ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine in S. coelicolor A3(2) cells grown in SMM with 0.5 M NaCl at 39°C since the endogenously produced ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine would interfere with the HPLC-based activity assay of the ectoine hydroxylase. The cell extract was filtered with a 0.45-µm sterile filter and loaded onto a Source 15Q column (bed volume, 22 ml; Amersham Biosciences, Freiburg, Germany). This column was equilibrated with buffer B. The sample-loaded column was washed with 70 ml of buffer B, and the proteins were eluted from the column by applying a linear NaCl gradient (0 to 0.4 M NaCl in buffer B). The ectoine hydroxylase eluted from the Source 15Q column at approximately 150 mM NaCl. The pooled protein fractions exhibiting ectoine hydroxylase activity were concentrated by ultrafiltration (10-kDa cutoff [Centricon YM-10; Millipore GmbH, Germany]) and loaded onto a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 75 prep-grade column (Amersham Biosciences, Freiburg, Germany). This gel filtration column was equilibrated with buffer B containing 150 mM NaCl at a temperature of 25°C. Fractions with ectoine hydroxylase activity were eluted with buffer B containing 150 mM NaCl, after 55 ml had passed through the column; this corresponds approximately to a molecular mass of 35 kDa. The pooled active fractions were concentrated (Centricon YM-10), desalted with buffer C (3 mM potassium phosphate buffer [pH 7.4]), and loaded onto a ceramic hydroxyapatite column (Macro-Prep type I, 20 µm; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Munich, Germany) that had been equilibrated with buffer C. The EctD enzyme did not bind to this column material and was recovered from the flowthrough fractions. The purified enzyme was stored at –80°C in buffer B with 150 mM NaCl after shock freezing in liquid nitrogen.
Purity of the EctD protein was monitored by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). SDS-PAGE was performed in a Mini-PROTEAN 3 apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Munich, Germany) on a 12.5% polyacrylamide gel, and proteins were visualized by staining with Coomassie brilliant blue. Protein concentrations were measured by the method of Bradford (11) with the Bio-Rad Protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Munich, Germany), using bovine serum albumin as a reference standard. The concentration of the pure EctD protein was calculated by measuring its A280, taking into account the molecular mass and the extinction coefficient derived from the amino acid composition of the EctD protein.
Amino acid sequencing of EctD.
For the determination of the amino-terminal end of the purified ectoine hydroxylase, the EctD protein was separated by SDS-PAGE and electroblotted onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Schwalbach, Germany). After the protein was stained with Coomassie brilliant blue, the band was cut out of the membrane and subjected to sequential protein sequencing cycles by Edman degradation. Protein sequencing was performed by the Universitätsklinikum Münster, AG Proteinanalytik (G. Mersmann).
Determination of the molecular mass of EctD by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.
One-microliter samples of various dilutions of the purified EctD enzyme were mixed on a gold-plated target with 1 µl of a saturated solution of sinapinic acid in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid-67% acetonitrile and dried under air. The samples were analyzed using a Voyager-DE/RP matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometer in the linear mode.
Determination of the relative molecular mass of EctD by gel filtration chromatography.
The apparent molecular mass of the purified ectoine hydroxylase was determined by gel filtration chromatography on a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 75 prep-grade column (Amersham Biosciences, Freiburg, Germany) equilibrated with buffer B containing 150 mM NaCl at 25°C. Aprotinin from bovine lung (6.5 kDa), cytochrome c from horse heart (12.4 kDa), carbonic anhydrase from bovine erythrocytes (29 kDa), albumin from bovine serum (66.2 kDa), and dextran blue (2,000 kDa) were used as molecular mass marker standards (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany).
Computer analysis of DNA and protein sequences.
DNA and protein sequences were analyzed and assembled with the Vector NTI 8.0 software (Invitrogen Bioinformatics, Karlsruhe, Germany). Searches for proteins related to the EctABC and EctD enzymes from S. coelicolor A3(2) were performed with the BLAST program at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) (1). Additional amino acid sequence comparisons were carried out through the web site provided by the Sanger Institute (www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/S_scabies). Protein sequences were aligned with the ClustalW algorithm (76) provided with the Vector NTI software using default values.
|
|
|---|
We monitored ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine production by HPLC in cultures of S. coelicolor A3(2) that were grown in a minimal medium (SMM) with glucose as the carbon source at the optimal growth temperature of 28°C and in a minimal medium whose salinity had been modestly raised by the addition of 0.5 M NaCl. No ectoine or 5-hydroxyectoine was detectable by cells grown in SMM in the absence of added salt, but considerable amounts of both ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine were synthesized by S. coelicolor A3(2) under the high-salinity growth conditions (Fig. 2B). Ectoine biosynthesis preceded 5-hydroxyectoine production, and eventually the 5-hydroxyectoine content of the cells superseded that of ectoine (Fig. 2B).
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Synthesis of ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine in S. coelicolor A3(2) in response to high salinity and high growth temperature. S. coelicolor A3(2) was grown in a chemically defined minimal medium (SMM) with the indicated salinities and growth temperatures. Growth of the S. coelicolor A3(2) cultures was monitored by measuring the OD578 (open squares). The ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine contents of the cells were determined by HPLC analysis. Intracellular ectoine content is indicated by white bars, and intracellular 5-hydroxyectoine content is shown by black bars. The data shown are the means of two independent measurements of two separately grown cultures.
|
Salt-stressed cells of S. coelicolor A3(2) contained a mixture of ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine, with 5-hydroxyectoine dominating the ectoine/5-hydroxyectoine solute pool in stationary-phase cultures (Fig. 2B and 2D). A preferential production of 5-hydroxyectoine in the stationary phase has also been observed in the moderate halophile S. salexigens (15). One might thus speculate that 5-hydroxyectoine serves a special protecting function in those cells whose growth has slowed down or ceased entirely. This physiological function of 5-hydroxyectoine might not necessarily be connected with its role in the adaptation to unfavorable osmotic conditions. Heat-stressed S. coelicolor A3(2) cells contained primarily 5-hydroxyectoine (Fig. 2C), implying that the hydroxylated derivative of ectoine is the physiologically better heat stress protectant.
The inspection of the genetic organization of the ectABCD gene cluster in the genome of S. coelicolor A3(2) (6) suggests that these four genes are cotranscribed as an operon. Biosynthesis of 5-hydroxyectoine by the EctD hydroxylase requires the prior production of ectoine via the sequential enzymatic reactions of the EctBAC enzymes (Fig. 1) (15). The preferential accumulation of 5-hydroxyectoine in either heat-stressed or stationary-phase cultures (Fig. 2) suggests that either posttranscriptional (e.g., preferential stabilization of the ectD portion of the ectABCD mRNA) or posttranslational (e.g., enhanced stability of the EctD enzyme in comparison to the EctABC proteins) effects might operate in S. coelicolor A3(2) that eventually lead to 5-hydroxyectoine pools exceeding those of ectoine. In addition, the intracellular level of 2-oxoglutarate, a cosubstrate of the EctD enzyme (15), could modulate the extent of hydroxylation of preexisting ectoine in either heat-stressed or stationary-phase cultures.
There was a drop in the intracellular pool of ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine in the late stationary growth phase of S. coelicolor A3(2) cultures that underwent prolonged propagation at 39°C and 0.5 M NaCl (Fig. 2D); we currently have no adequate physiological explanation for this observation. However, we have previously observed such a phenomenon when we analyzed the ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine contents of cells from the moderate halophile S. salexigens (15).
Exogenously provided ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine extend the upper growth limit of S. coelicolor A3(2) under high-salinity growth conditions.
Ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine function as osmoprotectants, and an exogenous supply of low concentrations (1 mM) of either ectoine or 5-hydroxyectoine often offsets the detrimental effects of high salinity on cell growth (29, 38, 39, 62, 77). To test if a supply of either ectoine or 5-hydoxyectoine would have a beneficial effect on the proliferation of cells of S. coelicolor A3(2) confronted with high salinity, we grew this strain in a minimal medium at various NaCl concentrations in the absence or presence of either ectoine or 5-hydroxyectoine for 24 h and then determined the OD of the cultures (Fig. 3). In the absence of a compatible solute, the growth of S. coelicolor A3(2) was not significantly affected up to a concentration of 0.6 M NaCl. However, a further increase in the salinity of the growth medium resulted in a successive decline in cell growth and the addition of 1.4 M NaCl completely inhibited proliferation of S. coelicolor A3(2) (Fig. 3). The addition of either 1 mM ectoine or 1 mM 5-hydroxyectoine to the high-salinity-grown cultures had a strong osmoprotective effect and allowed S. coelicolor A3(2) to grow under saline conditions that were completely inhibitory for the cells propagated in the absence of these compatible solutes (Fig. 3).
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine protect S. coelicolor A3(2) against the growth-inhibiting effect of high salinity. S. coelicolor A3(2) was grown at 28°C in a chemically defined minimal medium (SMM) with the indicated salinities. The various cultures were inoculated (OD578 of 0.1) with an overnight culture of S. coelicolor A3(2) grown in SMM in the absence of additional NaCl. The cultures were then cultivated for 24 h in the absence (closed circles) or presence of 1 mM ectoine (closed squares) or 1 mM 5-hydroxyectoine (closed triangles).
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Salt and heat protection of S. coelicolor A3(2) by exogenously provided ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine. The cultures were inoculated to an OD578 of 0.1 with an overnight culture of S. coelicolor A3(2) in SMM at 28°C, and the cells were then grown in 25 ml of SMM in a 100-ml Erlenmeyer flask with glass beads on an orbital shaker. (A) S. coelicolor A3(2) cultures were grown in SMM with 1.2 M NaCl at 28°C in the absence of added compatible solutes (closed circles) or in the presence of either 1 mM ectoine (closed squares), 1 mM 5-hydroxyectoine (closed triangles), or a mixture of 0.5 mM ectoine and 0.5 mM 5-hydroxyectoine (open squares). (B) S. coelicolor A3(2) cultures were grown in SMM at 39°C in the absence of added compatible solutes (closed circles) or in the presence of either 1 mM ectoine (closed squares), 1 mM 5-hydroxyectoine (closed triangles), or a mixture of 0.5 mM ectoine and 0.5 mM 5-hydroxyectoine (open squares). (C) S. coelicolor A3(2) cultures were grown in SMM at 39°C with 1.2 M NaCl in the absence of added compatible solutes (closed circles) or in the presence of either 1 mM ectoine (closed squares), 1 mM 5-hydroxyectoine (closed triangles), or a mixture of 0.5 mM ectoine and 0.5 mM 5-hydroxyectoine (open squares).
|
We then combined both salt stress (1.2 M NaCl) and heat stress (39°C) and monitored the influence of the ectoines on cell growth. In the absence of a compatible solute, S. coelicolor A3(2) was unable to grow at all under these stressful conditions, but both ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine had a strong stress protective effect and efficiently rescued cell growth. Again, the most efficient stress protection was afforded by the equimolar mixture of both ectoines (Fig. 4C).
Addition of the equimolar mixture of the ectoines to the medium provided the best salt stress (Fig. 3A) and heat stress (Fig. 3B) protection to S. coelicolor A3(2) cultures and in particular against the combined detrimental effects of both types of stress (Fig. 3C). We currently have no adequate physiological or biophysical explanation why the stress-protective effects of a mixture of the ectoines exceed that of either of the compatible solutes alone (Fig. 3).
High salinity and high growth temperature trigger ectoine uptake in S. coelicolor A3(2).
The osmoprotective and heat stress protective effects of compatible solutes added to the growth medium depend on the uptake of these compounds into the cell via dedicated transport systems (33, 43). The fact that exogenously provided ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine confer heat stress and salt stress protection to S. coelicolor A3(2) cultures (Fig. 4) implies that at least one ectoine/5-hydroxyectoine transport system is operating in S. coelicolor A3(2). To investigate this directly, we carried out transport assays with 14C-labeled ectoine. The radiolabeled ectoine was added to mid-exponential growth-phase cultures (OD578 of 1) of S. coelicolor A3(2) at a substrate concentration of 19 µM, and the initial uptake of [14C]ectoine by the cells was measured. No uptake of [14C]ectoine was detectable in cells that were grown at the optimal growth temperature of 28°C in the absence of salt stress (Fig. 5A). A rise in the salinity (0.5 M NaCl) or growth temperature (39°C) of the cultures triggered [14C]ectoine uptake (Fig. 5A). The highest level of [14C]ectoine uptake occurred in S. coelicolor A3(2) cells that were grown under both high-salinity (0.5 M NaCl) and high-temperature (39°C) conditions (Fig. 5A).
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Uptake and accumulation of [14C]ectoine by S. coelicolor A3(2). (A) Cultures of S. coelicolor A3(2) were grown in SMM at 28°C (closed circles), at 28°C with 0.5 M NaCl (closed diamonds), at 39°C (closed triangles), and 39°C with 0.5 M NaCl (closed squares) to the mid-log growth phase (OD578 of 0.5 to 1). [14C]ectoine was then added to the cultures to a substrate concentration of 19 µM, and uptake of the radiolabeled ectoine by the cells was monitored by scintillation counting. The data shown are the mean of at least two independent experiments. (B) Cultures of S. coelicolor A3(2) were grown in SMM under the conditions described in panel A. [14C]ectoine was then added to the growth medium at a substrate concentration of 19 µM, and the accumulation of the radiolabeled substrate was monitored either immediately after the addition of [14C]ectoine or after 1 h of incubation at the indicated conditions (dotted bars, growth in SMM at 28°C; hatched bars, growth in SMM at 28°C with 0.5 M NaCl; gray bars, growth in SMM at 39°C; black bars, growth in SMM at 39°C with 0.5 M NaCl). The data shown are the mean of at least two independent experiments.
|
Ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine are closely related in chemical structure (Fig. 1), and it is thus likely that both compounds are taken up by the cells via the same transport system(s). The identity of the ectoine/5-hydroxyectoine transport system(s) operating in S. coelicolor A3(2) is currently unknown. It is also not clear whether increased [14C]ectoine uptake at high salinity and high growth temperature is a consequence of increased gene expression, an effect on transporter activity, or a combination of both types of regulations.
Purification of the ectoine hydroxylase from S. coelicolor A3(2).
The ectoine hydroxylase (EctD) from the moderate halophile S. salexigens is currently the only ectoine hydroxylase whose enzymatic properties have been biochemically characterized (15). We therefore set out to purify and biochemically characterize the ectoine hydroxylase (EctD) from S. coelicolor A3(2) as an additional representative of this family of enzymes.
Cell extracts were prepared from cells grown at 39°C in the presence of 0.5 M NaCl for the purification of the ectoine hydroxylase. Ectoine hydroxylase activity was readily detected in the crude cell extract (Table 1). We initially followed the purification scheme developed by Bursy et al. (15) for the purification of the ectoine hydroxylase from S. salexigens, but this did not yield a pure enzyme preparation for the EctD protein from S. coelicolor A3(2) (data not shown). We therefore modified the original purification scheme and purified the ectoine hydroxylase from S. coelicolor A3(2) to apparent homogeneity by sequential anion-exchange chromatography on Source 15Q and gel filtration on Superdex 75 and ceramic hydroxyapatite material (Table 1). Unfortunately, the last chromatographic step resulted in a substantial loss of ectoine hydroxylase activity (Table 1), but it effectively removed a number of contaminating proteins from the enzyme preparation. We obtained a highly pure ectoine hydroxylase as judged by SDS-PAGE on a 12.5% polyacrylamide gel (Fig. 6A). The purified protein migrated on the SDS-PAGE with an apparent electrophoretic mobility corresponding to a 38.5-kDa protein species.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Summary of the steps used for purification of ectoine hydroxylase EctD from S. coelicolor A3(2)a
|
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Purification of the ectoine hydroxylase EctD and enzymatic properties of the purified enzyme. (A) SDS-PAGE of the purified ectoine hydroxylase (EctD) from S. coelicolor A3(2). Samples of the marker proteins (lane 1) and of EctD (lane 2, 0.5 µg protein; lane 3, 2 µg protein) were electrophoretically separated on an SDS-12.5% polyacrylamide gel, and the proteins were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. (B) Double-reciprocal plot of the initial velocity of 5-hydroxyectoine formation (V) as a function of substrate concentration ([S]). For the determination of the kinetic parameters of EctD, the concentration of ectoine (closed triangles) or the 2-oxoglutarate cosubstrate (closed squares) was varied at an affixed concentration of 10 mM 2-oxoglutarate or ectoine, respectively. Kinetic parameters were obtained from the Michaelis-Menten equation. (C) Temperature dependence of the EctD activity. EctD activity was measured in samples incubated at the indicated temperatures. The values given are the mean of two independent measurements. The maximum corresponds to a specific activity of 20 U mg–1.
|
The start codon of ectD in the S. coelicolor A3(2) genome is separated from the stop codon of ectC by only 6 bp, suggesting that ectD might be cotranscribed with the ectABC gene cluster. Database searches revealed putative ectABCD operons in the streptomycetes S. chrysomallus (65), Streptomyces avermitilis (35), Streptomyces griseus (60), and the plant pathogen Streptomyces scabiei (www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/S_scabies). The putative ectoine hydroxylases encoded by the ectD genes of these Streptomyces species are all very closely related to the amino acid sequence of the EctD protein from S. coelicolor A3(2), with amino acid sequence identities ranging from 83% to 86% (data not shown).
Properties of the purified ectoine hydroxylase.
Like the ectoine hydroxylase from S. salexigens (15), the EctD protein from S. coelicolor A3(2) was also found to be a monomeric enzyme as judged by gel filtration chromatography. Addition of FeSO4 to the enzyme assay was absolutely required for ectoine hydroxylase activity. The enzyme activity of EctD was stimulated up to a concentration of 1 mM FeSO4, whereas higher FeSO4 concentrations reduced the ectoine hydroxylase enzyme activity (data not shown). Within the superfamily of non-heme-containing iron(II)- and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases, the addition of ascorbate and catalase sometimes leads to increased enzymatic activities (15, 30). However, ectoine hydroxylase activity of the purified EctD protein was neither enhanced nor inhibited by either catalase or ascorbate or both (data not shown). Oxygen and the cosubstrate 2-oxoglutarate were absolutely required for the EctD-mediated enzyme reaction (data not shown). The kinetic parameters for the ectoine hydroxylase from S. coelicolor A3(2) were as follows: the Km for the substrate ectoine was 2.6 ± 0.2 mM, and the Km for the cosubstrate 2-oxoglutarate was 6.2 ± 0.2 mM. The Vmax of the EctD enzyme was 20 ± 1 U mg–1 protein (Fig. 6B). The enzyme had a pH optimum of 7.5 and was active in a broad temperature range with an optimum at 32°C (Fig. 6C). Consequently, there is no specific temperature activation of the purified EctD hydroxylase activity that could explain the preferential production of 5-hydroxyectoine found in S. coelicolor A3(2) cells grown at 39°C (Fig. 2C).
The EctD-type proteins are distantly related to L-proline 4-hydroxylases and L-proline 3-hydroxylases (15). These proline-hydroxylating enzymes also belong to the superfamily of the non-heme-containing iron(II)- and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases and carry out enzymatic reactions similar to those of the ectoine hydroxylase (30). We therefore tested whether the S. coelicolor A3(2) EctD protein would use L-proline as its substrate and hydroxylate this amino acid. However, this was not the case (data not shown), demonstrating that the EctD enzyme from S. coelicolor A3(2) is a bona fide ectoine hydroxylase with no additional L-proline hydroxylase activity.
A comparison of the characteristics of the ectoine hydroxylase purified in this study from S. coelicolor A3(2) with those of the ectoine hydroxylase recently purified from the moderate halophile S. salexigens (15) revealed similar enzymatic properties with respect to pH [S. salexigens, 7.5; S. coelicolor A3(2), 7.5] and temperature profile [S. salexigens, 32°C; S. coelicolor A3(2), 32°C], affinity (Km) to the substrate ectoine [S. salexigens, 3.5 mM; S. coelicolor A3(2), 2.6 mM], and the cosubstrate 2-oxoglutarate [S. salexigens, 5.2 mM; S. coelicolor A3(2), 6.2 mM], overall catalytic performance (Vmax) [S. salexigens, 13.8 U mg–1; S. coelicolor A3(2), 20 U mg–1], and inability to hydroxylate L-proline. These findings suggest that EctD-type proteins from other microorganisms are likely to possess similar enzymatic characteristics. EctD-type proteins are closely related in amino acid sequence (15) and form a separate subgroup within the superfamily of the non-heme-containing iron(II)- and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases (EC 1.14.11) (30).
We have identified in recent database searches over 50 EctD-related proteins from various gram-negative and gram-positive Bacteria with amino acid sequence identities that range between 86% and 40% (data not shown). Many of these proteins are annotated as putative proline hydroxylases in the NCBI database. We believe that most of these annotations are incorrect and stem from the fact that EctD-type proteins exhibit a substantial degree of amino acid sequence relatedness to proline hydroxylases. These enzymes carry out enzymatic reactions similar to that of the ectoine hydroxylase, and both groups of enzymes are members of the same dioxygenase superfamily (15, 30). Similarly, some EctD-related proteins are annotated in the NCBI database as phytanoyl-coenzyme A (CoA) dioxygenases. The recent structural analysis of the EctD protein from S. salexigens (K. Reuter, J. Bursy, A. Heine, M. Pittelkow, and E. Bremer; unpublished results) revealed an overall fold of this protein similar to that of the human phytanoyl-CoA 2-hydroxylase, an enzyme that carries out the initial alpha-oxidation step in the degradation of phytenic acid in peroxisomes (59). This observation explains the probably incorrect annotation of EctD-related proteins as putative phytanoyl-CoA dioxygenases.
|
|
|---|
The function of compatible solutes as microbial heat and chill stress protectants does not seem to rely on a massive intracellular accumulation of these compounds. Both heat- and chill-stressed cells contained substantially smaller amounts of compatible solutes than osmotically stressed cells in various microorganisms (16, 33, 42, 50). This is also true for the heat stress-induced synthesis of ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine in S. coelicolor A3(2) in comparison to osmotically stressed cells (Fig. 2). Our data suggest that ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine synthesized by S. coelicolor A3(2) serve as both salt and heat stress protectants in this actinomycete. However, definitive proof of this hypothesis can only come from a physiological analysis of S. coelicolor A3(2) mutants with gene disruptions in the ectABCD gene cluster.
When both high salinity (1.2 M NaCl) and heat stress (39°C) were simultaneously applied (Fig. 4C), the growth of S. coelicolor A3(2) was entirely prevented (Fig. 4C). This observation implies that the intracellular levels of ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine achieved via de novo synthesis under these circumstances are insufficient to provide adequate cellular protection. However, under such conditions, S. coelicolor A3(2) can still rely on the uptake of both ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine from environmental sources for efficient salt and heat stress protection (Fig. 4C).
Ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine are only synthesized by microorganisms (15, 23, 26, 78), and, hence, the only sources for these two compatible solutes within the soil habitat of S. coelicolor A3(2) must stem from either decomposing or osmotically down-shocked bacterial cells (32, 78). It is likely that the concentrations of both ectoines in the soil are very low and probably highly variable, but our transport assays with radiolabeled ectoine demonstrate that S. coelicolor A3(2) can scavenge these compounds from environmental sources and accumulate them even at very low (µM) external substrate concentrations (Fig. 5).
Ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine are closely related in chemical structure (36) (Fig. 1), and both compatible solutes have protein-stabilizing properties (4, 5, 9, 18, 47, 54, 57, 58). However, not all ectoine producers also synthesize 5-hydroxyectoine (15, 26, 49, 50, 71, 73). The formation of the hydroxylated derivative of ectoine might provide additional advantages to a microbial cell. In vitro studies have shown that 5-hydroxyectoine often has protein-stabilizing properties superior to those of ectoine (9, 18, 54), and its capacity to provide desiccation tolerance to Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas putida was comparable to that of trehalose (57, 58). Likewise, substantial differences exist between ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine with respect to their effects on the melting temperature of double-stranded DNA: ectoine decreases whereas 5-hydroxyectoine increases the melting temperature of the DNA (74).
How might ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine provide thermoprotection to S. coelicolor A3(2)? Both ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine might directly help to maintain the proper three-dimensional structure of thermolabile proteins in S. coelicolor A3(2) in vivo. In vitro studies with various model enzymes support such a function of ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine (4, 9, 47, 54). One should note, however, that 5-hydroxyectoine and ectoine can have very different thermostabilizing properties when tested with the same model enzyme (9), despite their close chemical relatedness (Fig. 1).
Another possible way to positively influence proper protein folding under heat stress conditions is through the effects of compatible solutes (e.g., glycine betaine) on the chaperone network of the cell (24, 25). Adaptation to heat stress in many microbial species depends on the synthesis of heat shock proteins, many of which are molecular chaperones that prevent protein aggregation, disassemble protein aggregates, and assist in protein refolding (14). Low physiological concentrations of glycine betaine activated the molecular chaperone system in E. coli, thereby promoting local folding of chaperone-bound polypeptides and allowing protein disaggregation under heat stress conditions (24, 25). Overproduction of the compatible solute proline in E. coli restored the viability of a mutant with a defect in the major heat shock chaperone DnaK at 42°C and significantly reduced the protein aggregation defect of the dnaK mutant strain (22).
The influence of compatible solutes on the structure of nucleic acids, in particular on double-stranded DNA (52) and protein-DNA interactions (66), is not well understood. The compatible solutes proline, glycine betaine, ectoine, and 5-hydroxyectoine have been shown to influence (either as destabilizers or as stabilizers) the melting temperature of the DNA helix (68, 74). In addition, ectoine served as a stabilizer of a higher-order nucleoprotein complex at the regulatory region of bacterial rRNA promoters (66). Hence, it is conceivable that the accumulation of ectoine and 5-hydroxyectoine under heat stress in S. coelicolor A3(2) could have profound effects on the local melting of DNA within promoter regions and thereby affect gene transcription or the productive interactions of regulatory proteins with their DNA target sequences.
Financial support for this study was provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through the SFB-395, the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung through the "Genomnetzwerk Göttingen," the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie, and the Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology (Marburg, Germany).
Published ahead of print on 10 October 2008. ![]()
Present address: Laboratory of Extreme Environments, Microbiology, University of West Brittany (Brest), European Institute of Marine Studies, Technopôle Brest-Iroise, F-29280 Plouzané, France. ![]()
|
|
|---|
-acetyldiaminobutyrate as an enzyme stabilizer and an intermediate in the biosynthesis of hydroxyectoine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:3774-3779.This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»